AbuTwins:


That's not you business!

And you want people to contribute to the thread you created abi? Is like the remaining sense in your brain has gone with your previous monika

honesttalk21:


When Mary the mother of her Jesus took her baby Jesus to show her people was this a court?

Is it the people that brought baby Jesus to the location he spoke as a baby?

Was the speech of Jesus as a baby actually part of his prophethood or defense of the peculiar situation of his mother?

Did Jesus as a baby debate and castigate the religious leaders of the Jews and Israelites?


4.156-162 Maududi - Sayyid Abul Ala Maududi - Tafhim al-Qur'an
This is in continuation of the theme under discussion.
The calumny against Mary concerning the birth of Jesus has been declared here as "disbelief" because it was not directed against the person of innocent Mary or her son but against Jesus Christ, the Messenger of God. The Jews had absolutely no ground for suspicion about his miraculous birth without father, because God had caused the whole Community to stand as witness to the miracle. When Virgin Mary, who belonged to the noble and well-known religious family of the Israelites, came home with the new-born child, a large crowd gathered there and demanded an explanation from her. But she simply pointed to the child. The crowd could not understand how a child in the cradle could speak, but to their utter astonishment, the child began to speak clearly and fluently and addressing the crowd, he declared, "I am Allah's servant: Allah has given me the Book and made me a Prophet." (Maryam, XIX : 30)

Remember the initial tafsir you stand on is on
Maryam, XIX : 30 and Ala Madudi tafsir in on verses 30-33
A simple request that you show where Ibn Kathir also says Jesus was taken to court as a baby and subsequently crucified has been repeated and you pretend not to see it or refuse to answer or both.

You're reasoning is surely closed at the moment and I have no more time to waste with you.

صُمٌّۢ بُكْمٌ عُمْىٌۭ فَهُمْ لَا يَرْجِعُونَ
"Willful ignorance being assembled, so those not revert themselves"

Another one again using question to answer question.. Did you read it from Ala Maududi tafsir that people brought baby Jesus to the location where he spoke as a baby? Diversion tactic which you slaves are good at won't work here anymore. Answer the question before you and stop thinking from your anus

advocatejare:

Don’t mind that joker, he wants to use foolish ile kewu sense here, he wants to confuse himself and use diversion tactic. It won’t work, if he doesn’t answer, we won’t change the topic of discussion!

It won't work here, he must answer the question before him. I so much love that question as it sweet my belly

Baatunde:


Anitislaam, try to exert your thinking faculty, be a good boy read my previous responses to your fellow dodger called advocatejare and tell me what further answer you want. You lot have nothing to offer by way of sensible and scholarly discussion with presentable facts and your best tactic is to be evasive. I challenge you also if you have confidence in your knowledge lets talk about your Bible don't deflect by asking me for an answer you would not accept. Mind you I am happy to be a slave of Allah the same your Lord and Saviour was

“The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the God of our fathers, has glorified his servant Jesus” (Acts 3:13).

We should talk about Bible when you've not answer the question before you. Shey na Alfa onijalabilu taught you diversion kewu tactics?

Bobo be a good ẹrú, answer that simple question jare

AbuTwins:
Anything Israel shit out from their mouth just swallow am like that!

Anyone Israel kills is a terrorist!

Israel is your god o!

It's only a matter of time as your god go soon die!

See ẹrú iku, you never see nothing

advocatejare:

Why haven’t answered this:
How did crescent moon get to the top of the minarets of your holiest mosques if your Allah is not a pagan moon god? Or was Allah so powerless to have allowed Othman empire to use moon to represent him

Answer it and we will continue!

Baatunde be a good ẹrú, the above question shouldn't be hard for allah and Muhammad to answer through you. Dakun answer the question lobatan

Make I no talk wetin dey my mind

FxMasterz:


Don't be surprised. AbuTwins is same as AntiChristian. Both monikers belong to the same person.

Really... Good that you resurrected back with another moniker. You go chop am tired as your size dey plenty for my hand

WorkRemotely:




1) Kindly Quote The Quran Verse of Jesus Being The Word of God.

Quran 4:171
O People given the Book(s)! Do not exaggerate in your religion nor say anything concerning Allah, but the truth; the Messiah, Jesus the son of Mary, is purely a Noble Messenger of Allah, and His Word; which He sent towards Maryam, and a Spirit from Him

WorkRemotely:



2)


Jesus Christ is with God from the beginning and Holy Spirit

John 1:1-4

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. In him was life, and that life was the light of men.




From The Above Statement; Why is This "HIM" Not The Holy Spirit ? What Makes You Think That This "HIM" Above Refers To Jesus When No Part of The Bible Wrote So ?

The HIM there is Jesus Christ, he is the word from the beginning with the father. The word became flesh and dwell with us as read in both Quran and Bible

John 1:14
And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth.



I believe you know what that FLESH is all about? My joy is seeing you Muslims asking me questions but defending Islam, Muhammad and allah with taqqiya is what I hate most

AbuTwins:


We is for Allah and He has no partner!
Elohim is Plural but is usually used with a singular verb even in your Bible! Yet you still call your Gods three!

Allah is one! He said it himself.
And even in many languages, "We" and "Us" can be used to refer to a person of authority!

Bobo slave, allah has many partners stop listening to what your alfas are telling you. Try reading your own Quran


Your allah wish to have a son

Quran 39:4
If Allah had willed to choose a son, He could have chosen what He would of that which He hath created...

Your islamic deity allah has daughters

Quran 37:153 Muhammad Asad
“He has chosen daughters in preference to sons”

Quran 37:153 Wahiduddin Khan
Has He chosen daughters over sons


AND THE DAUGTHERS ARE:

Quran 53:19-21
Have you then considered Lat and ‘Uzza And another, the third, Manat Are the males for you and for Him the females

WorkRemotely:



The Bible Also Puts it That The Christian God Said That:


" Let US Make Man in Our Own Image".



So, Who Are Those With The Christian God With Whom The Christian God Seeks Permission?

This is the answer to your question, read slowly and gently. If you are confused or in doubt, you can ask any further question bothering you


Genesis 1:26

And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

Jesus Christ is with God from the beginning and Holy Spirit

John 1:1-4

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. In him was life, and that life was the light of men.


Quran says Jesus Christ is the word of God isn't it or I should quote the verse? So Jesus Christ and Holy spirit are with God in Genesis 1:26 this is not the case of Royal we bobo slave

honesttalk21:


Ala Madudi says Jesus Christ was brought to court to be crucified as a baby you say and you suggest Ibn Kathir also has this view as you claim to reference both of them

See highlighted in red

The below again is Ala Maududi tafsir in regards to Quran 19:33 we are referencing to here, stay on the track and do justice to the questions raised.. This is not the time to go deaf, dumb and blind


(19:33) Peace be upon me the day I was born and the day I will die, and the day I will be raised up alive."

This speech in the cradle by Jesus was the sign to which the angel referred in( Ayat 21). As Allah intended to punish the children of Israel for their continuous wicked ways and evil deeds, He made a pious virgin girl of the family of Prophet Aaron, who had devoted herself to worship in the Temple under the patronage of Zachariah, bear a child and bring it before her people in order to concentrate the whole attention of the thousands of people assembled there on this extraordinary event. Then He made this new born child speak out even in the cradle that he had been appointed a Prophet. Though they had seen this wonderful sign of Allah, they rejected the Prophethood of Jesus and brought him to the court for crucifixion, and thus incurred the wrath of Allah.


THE QUESTION IS:

1. Is Jesus Christ brought to the court for crucifixion as a prophet while in cradle since you said he had been appointed a prophet from the birth

N.B. To be on the safer side, just answer YES or NO then we'll move on

honesttalk21:


Usage of the royal we in scripture predates its adoption by monarchies. The scriptural use of plural pronouns by God existed long before the practice was adopted by earthly rulers.

The major problem with you is that you don't want to obey simple instructions. Go and search for the the history of royal we and when it was firstly used

Stop putting Islam, allah and Muhammad to shame here with you nonsensical, stupidity and ignorance.. Just do as I said lobatan

honesttalk21:

When was Genesis 1:26 written?

Was this not centuries before Christ? You refer to 12th century

Genesis 1:26

And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

Jesus Christ is with God from the beginning and Holy Spirit

John 1:1-4

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. In him was life, and that life was the light of men.


Quran says Jesus Christ is the word of God isn't it or I should quote the verse? So Jesus Christ and Holy spirit are with God in Genesis 1:26 this is not the case of Royal we bobo slave

honesttalk21:


Do you see reference to Jesus at 30 in Ala-Madudi or pretend to be blind?

Now go back to ala maududi, read gently all over again and point out to where he mention Jesus at 30?

Should we conclude that the first question is hard for allah and Muhammad to answer through you?

1. Is Jesus Christ brought to the court for crucifixion as a prophet while in cradle since you said he had been appointed a prophet from the birth

honesttalk21:

Screenshot Ibn Kathir saying a Jesus was brought as a baby to court. Remember to share reference too.

Ala maududi said so, should I screenshot since you are finally in disarray? But wait did you now hate Maududi for exposing your stupidity?

AbuTwins:


This is false!

The KJV was translated from one of the worst manuscript ever!

I didn't say it and don't take it from me!

Do your research!

Eru-iku allahu, as M. M. Pickthall, Yusuf Ali, etc are the worst manuscript ever translator to English and Sahih Muslim the greatest exposure that exposed the nonsense in Islam and Muhammad

Qasim6:


Guy

Do you know anything about context ?
This is 2024, you should be wiser.
Stop embarrassing yourself!

Slave, go and ask your scholars and the authors of quran why they attributed those partners with allah since you love ranting that allah is one. Those verses shocked you right? I still have many more to show you from your various ahadith and tafsirs but let's start from the Quran first

honesttalk21:
Though they had seen this wonderful Sign of Allah, they rejected the Prophethood of Jesus and brought him to the court for crucifixion

Were you blindfolded before? So the questions which you refused to answer are:


1. Is Jesus Christ brought to the court for crucifixion as a prophet while in cradle since you said he had been appointed a prophet from the birth

2. If Jesus Christ according to your moribund and ignorance wasn't crucified, why was he brought to the court for crucifixion as read in your tafsirs?

3. Are all that was written in Ala Madudi tafsir what to expect in the future when Jesus Christ comes back again?

honesttalk21:

Did you not change though they had seen this wonderful sign to and .....?

See try and get zamzam water to wash your eye with maybe you will regain your sight organ back. Where did I change the though or whatever you said above?

AntiisIam:



Then He made this new born child speak out even in the cradle that he had been appointed a Prophet. Though they had seen this wonderful sign of Allah, they rejected the Prophethood of Jesus and brought him to the court for crucifixion, and thus incurred the wrath of Allah.

honesttalk21:


I don't blame you. It's your way and those before you.

Yeah, it is our way to exposed your gullible, ignorance and lies

honesttalk21:

I asked that you show similar from Ibn Kathir you keep repeating what is said before as ibn Kathir you claim to also reference said no such thing

I have given you many links none of them you click on to read by yourself, is Ala Maududi not part of your islamic scholars? Or because of what he said as it didn't suit your ignorance you kicked against him right?

honesttalk21:


Trying to hide your lie?

Hiding my lies, slave you funny die.. Where did I lied abeg point it out?

You are pained that I proved it to you on the fact that Mary was not a levite abi, it was romans that sentenced Jesus Christ to be crucified and not the Jews you're ranting on, etc.

My joy is to be exposing your taqqiya you ahlu bidiah slaves

honesttalk21:

4.156-162 Maududi - Sayyid Abul Ala Maududi - Tafhim al-Qur'an
This is in continuation of the theme under discussion.
The calumny against Mary concerning the birth of Jesus has been declared here as "disbelief" because it was not directed against the person of innocent Mary or her son but against Jesus Christ, the Messenger of God. The Jews had absolutely no ground for suspicion about his miraculous birth without father, because God had caused the whole Community to stand as witness to the miracle. When Virgin Mary, who belonged to the noble and well-known religious family of the Israelites, came home with the new-born child, a large crowd gathered there and demanded an explanation from her. But she simply pointed to the child. The crowd could not understand how a child in the cradle could speak, but to their utter astonishment, the child began to speak clearly and fluently and addressing the crowd, he declared, "I am Allah's servant: Allah has given me the Book and made me a Prophet." (Maryam, XIX : 30) Thus Allah cut at the very root of the slander about his birth. That is why none ever accused Mary of fornication nor taunted Jesus with being an illegitimate son until he stained his maturity. But when at the age of thirty, he started his mission to invite the people to the way of God and rebuked the Jews for their evil deeds and exposed the hypocrisies of their scholars and jurists and warned the whole community of the consequences of moral degradation, they turned against him

You can't know Jesus Christ more than those that were there when he is on earth physically. Muhammad came over 600yr after the Ascension of Christ to heaven and his patners cooked lies for you about Christ after your pedophile messenger Muhammad was poisoned to death

Jesus Christ never rebuked or condemned anyone, he even prayed for those that crucified him so please stop cooking lies story here and answer the questions I raised above as read in Ala Maududi tafsir

honesttalk21:



Usage of the royal we in scripture predates its adoption by monarchies. The scriptural use of plural pronouns by God existed long before the practice was adopted by earthly rulers.


There are many verses in the Quran where Allah speaks using the Arabic pronoun “nahnu” (meaning we) or its associated suffix….”we” created, “we” sent down, etc. In Arabic, this is perfectly acceptable, because “nahnu” does not necessarily imply plurality. It can also indicate the speaker’s lofty status, and thus, when the Most High uses it, the meaning is evident.

Nahnu is still royal we in Arabic, I've told you go and read the history of royal we and stop defending nonsense

Below are the partners of allah as read in Quran, just read and be fine

Quran 37:153 Muhammad Asad
“He has chosen daughters in preference to sons”

Quran 37:153 Wahiduddin Khan
Has He chosen daughters over sons


AND THE DAUGTHERS ARE:

Quran 53:19-21
Have you then considered Lat and ‘Uzza And another, the third, Manat Are the males for you and for Him the females

EnEnPeecee:


Isreal should stop listening to that vegetable Biden. They should continue in their campaigns against islamists terrorists.

No peace for Hamas.
No peace for Iran.
No peace for hezbola.
No peace for for alqaeda.
No peace for iswap.
No peace for alshabab.
No peace for Boko Haram
No peace for terrorists Muslims

All terrorists are Muslims but all Muslims are not terrorists

So far this below verse is in Quran, all Muslims are potential terrorists


Quran 8:12

 I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have rejected; so strike above the necks, and strike from them every one standing."

Antilslaam:


What concern allah with royal we or pluralis majestatis when it was first used in 12 century during the time of King Henry the ll or is your god allah the deity forced on you in 12 century when the royal we was first used and introduced?


Go check for the history of royal we and stop defending nonsense here

honesttalk21 you gerrit right? So stop attributing royal we to allah, that deity called allah has many partners..

honesttalk21:


In the simplest way since you claim to have used Ala Madudi and Ibn Kathir please show on the latter's tafsir where he says the baby was brought to court and crucified. Shameless liar!

You see this (For further details, please see Al-i-Imran (III): E.N.'s 44 and 53, and An-Nina (IV): E.N.'s 212,213).at the end of Ala-Madudi's tafsir on Quran 19:33 and of course cannot discern the meaning.

Do get educated here:


44 That is, "Although no man has touched you, yet a son shall be born to you." It should be noted that the same word "kazalika, "meaning "so shall it be," had been used in response to Zacharias' prayer. It, therefore, carries the same sense here. Moreover, the whole context here corroborates the story that Mary was given the glad tidings of the birth of a son without any sexual intercourse, and the birth of Christ, in actual fact, took place in that unusual way. If a son was to be born to her in the normal known way, and if the event of the birth of Jesus had taker. place in a natural way, then the whole discourse starting from verse 33 and ending with verse 63 would become absolutely pointless. Not only that but all other references to the unusual birth of Jesus in the Qur'an would lose their significance and meaning. The Christians had made Jesus the Son of God and worthy of worship simply because of his unusual birth without a father and the Jews had accused Mary because they had witnessed that she had given birth to a child, though she was not married. Had it been otherwise, then the two groups could have been told plainly that the girl was married to such and such a man and that Jesus was from his seed. In that case, one fails to see the reason why such a long introduction and a series of arguments should have been necessary to remove all doubts about his miraculous birth. Then Jesus could have been called the son of a particular man, instead of being called "the son of Mary". The position of those people who, on the one hand, profess to believe the Holy Qur'an to be the Word of Allah and on the other hand try to prove that Jesus was born after the natural coming together of a husband and wife, really try to show that Allah is not able to express Himself as clearly as these people. (May God protect us from blasphemy!)

53 That is, "If one's miraculous birth entitles one to become God or the Son of God, then Adam was better entitled to it because he was created without either a human father or a mother, while Jesus was born without a father only.

212 The Prophet Jesus has specially been called God's "Command" (Kalimah) because he was born without the usual agency of a father. God sent a Command that Mary should become pregnant without the semen of a man and she conceived. Although in the very beginning, the Christians were told that Christ had been born without a father by the Command of God, yet they were so misled by the Alexandrian Philosophy of Philo that they first mistook Kalimah (Command) for the "Divine Word"; then changed the "Divine Word" into the "Logos"; then they built on the Logos Doctrine which misguided them to the false belief in the divine nature of Jesus Christ. That is how they came to believe that God had revealed Himself or His eternal attribute of speech in the person of Jesus. (See John I : 1, 14).



213 Here Jesus has been called "A spirit from God" and in Al-Baqarah, 11 : 253, it is stated that God supported him (Jesus) with the "Holy Spirit". In both cases, it means that Allah had bestowed upon the Prophet Jesus a Holy Spirit that .was imbued with high moral values and was a perfection of truth and righteousness without any tinge of evil. The Christians were taught this very thing, but they exaggerated the notion: they took "a spirit from God" for "the Spirit of God" and perverted the meaning of the Holy Ghost into "the Spirit of God Himself" which had entered into Jesus Christ. Thus, a third god, "the Holy Ghost", was created along with God and Christ. This was their second transgression which led the Christians astray.

The perversion of "a spirit from God" into "the Spirit of God" (Holy Ghost) has been made in spite of the fact that according to the Gospel of Matthew, "The angel of the Lord appeared unto him (Joseph) in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary, thy wife: for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost," and not the Holy Ghost (1 : 20).

How many times am I going to show you that? Hope allah has not blindfolded you

A baby speak out even in the cradle that he had been appointed a prophet, they rejected his prophethood and brought him to court for crucifixion

honesttalk21:


From the link you sent, do you not see Ala Madudi and Ibn Kathir separated by a distance?

Do you not understand that these are are hyperlinks?

Ala Madudi is a different person from Ibn Kathir. Tap on the Ibn Kathir hyperlink and see his tafsir.

Are you against Ala Madudi because it doesn't suit your ignorance? Below is another link

https://www.islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=19&verse=27&to=34

honesttalk21:


Now let me explain what you pretend not to understand.
"This speech in the cradle by Jesus was the sign to which the angel referred in (Surah Maryam, Ayat 21)"

What is in Surah Maryam, Ayah 21?

He replied, “So will it be! Your Lord says, ‘It is easy for Me. And so will We make him a sign for humanity and a mercy from Us.’ It is a matter ˹already˺ decreed.”

He who replied is Jibril r.a who appeared to Mary in the form of a man and this verse is a response to Mary's question in Quran 19:20; She wondered, “How can I have a son when no man has ever touched me, nor am I unchaste?”

The sign; Jesus, is the conception of a baby without a man.
The speech is not the sign but Jesus spoke in defence of his mother when she was challenged on how he came to be. The sign is the miraculous conception.

You lack what is called comprehensive ability, skill and knowledge.

The conception of Jesus Christ is not the bone of contention here but rather how he was brought to court for crucifixion as read in those tafsirs. Stay on the track, don't try to deviate or shift the goalpost

honesttalk21:

You fail to understand and I am surprised at your reasoning. As a baby he was not rejected; as he grew and challenged their hypocrisy and they decided to eliminate him was when he was rejected.

Are you now reasoning from your anus? Does the tafsirs says as he grew up and challenged their hypocrisy, he was then rejected?

honesttalk21:

Have you seen a baby crucified before? Is it not clear that the jews/Israelites believe they crucified a grown man Jesus though this is make belief as Jesus was not crucified or killed

Why not ask your Islamic scholars and send your frustration to them for saying he was rejected while he was a baby when he speaks out in the cradle. I am only challenging your ignorance through what was written in your tafsirs

honesttalk21:

Have you seen a baby crucified before? Is it not clear that the jews/Israelites believe they crucified a grown man Jesus though this is make belief as Jesus was not crucified or killed.
The people showed their rejection by their disbelief. Quran 3:52. Is their ploy to crucify him and lie of crucufying him not a rejection? 4:157

Send that question to your scholars that do they seen a baby crucified before?

Taqqiya boy, you'll be exposed again for lying here. Crucifixion is a Roman form of execution, it was forbidden by Jewish law because so therefore, Jewish don't believe in crucifixion. Get your facts righy next time slave

honesttalk21:

God spoke through Jeremiah but who was seen to be speaking or is recorded as speaking? I guess it is God that is writing here on nairaland.com and not you with your Monika? Ludicrous!

Well I won't blame you for this utterances, had it been you know who a Prophet is you won't have typed this nonsense. If Muhammad was a through prophet, you will understand when and how God spoke through his servant

honesttalk21:

Jeremiah rebuked the Jews primarily by delivering stern warnings and prophecies of impending doom due to their faithlessness and idolatry
See the book of Jeremiah 7.

I've told you Jeremiah has no power to rebuked anyone except if ordered by God. Jeremiah was a prophet of God and not like your doom prophet of islam that was poisoned to death

honesttalk21:

Then what do you know about Taqiyya? Let me educate you.

Taqiyyah is the practice of concealing one’s belief and foregoing ordinary religious duties when under threat of death or injury. It is derived from the Arabic word “waqa,” meaning to shield oneself.

Taqqiya or the priciple of Muslims being permitted to lie to non-belivers. It is considered acceptable in islam


Bukhari (84:64-65) - Speaking from a position of power at the time, Ali confirms that lying is permissible in order to deceive an "enemy."

honesttalk21:

Is my life threatened and in this case by you this internet bot? Do I hide that Islam is my religion in any way?

Stop lying against the Jews and Prophet Jeremiah

honesttalk21:

Please Mr copy cat think for yourself.

Slave boy, always use your senses before typing nonsense or else, you will be exposed

honesttalk21:


Who is ALA-MADUDI IBN KATHIR?
I will appreciate a link if there's one.

I know Sayyid Abul Ala Maududi as a person but not ALA-MAUDUDI IBN-KATHIR.

https://myislam.org/surah-maryam/ayat-33/

honesttalk21:

From your post relating they rejected the Prophethood of Jesus and brought him to the court for crucifixion, and thus incurred the wrath of Allah.

Does this say Jesus was actually crucified? Or died as a result?

I PRAY YOU ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS

Is it while Jesus Christ was in cradle they rejected his prophethood?

Second Question, is it while Jesus Christ was in cradle they brought him to court for crucifixion?

honesttalk21:


Did Ala-Madudi in his Taysir on Quran 4:157 not say?

...
The fact that they bragged of slaying Jesus, knowing him to be a Messenger of God, shows how bold they had become in their crimes. We have shown in the previous Note that the miracle of his speech in the cradle had let no doubt whatsoever to remain in the minds of the Jews about his Prophethood. Then the clear signs that they witnessed from him (III : 49) were a conclusive proof that he was really a Prophet of God. Therefore their wicked behavior towards him was not the result of any misunderstanding about his Prophethood, but was an intentional crime against the one who had been appointed by Allah as Messenger.

.....

Is it in cradle they rejected his prophethood if YES, why do they reject his prophethood with Quran verse

honesttalk21:



Even according to the Bible, when the Prophet Jeremiah rebuked the Jews on account of their transgressions, they accused him of being in conspiracy with the Chaldeans and traitor against his people and sent him to prison. Likewise had the Jews treated John the Baptist a couple of years before the crucifixion of the Prophet Jesus. They counted John as a Prophet and acknowledged him as one of the most righteous men of their community, but when he criticized Herod (the ruler of Judea) for his evil ways, he was not tolerated. He was first sent to prison, then beheaded on the demand of Herod's beloved, the dancing girl.
It is, therefore, obvious from their record that when they presumed that they had crucified Jesus Christ, they bragged: "We have slain a Messenger of Allah. "
This is another parenthesis.
[b]This verse is explicit on the point that the Prophet Jesus Christ was rescued from crucifixion and that the Christians and the Jews are both wrong in believing that he died on the cross/b]. Ditto Ken4Christ

Taqqiya master you've come again lying for allah. Jeremiah didn't rebuked the Jews, it was God. God only spoke through Jeremiah, get your fact right before lying here and also, Jewish didn't beheaded John the Baptist. Herod was the Roman appointed king of Judaea, those that beheaded John the Baptist are Palestine

These slavery people from the religion of allah need to start afresh from Nursery 1

honesttalk21:


Tafsir according to who?

ALA-MAUDUDI IBN-KATHIR

honesttalk21:


Q19:33And Salam (peace) be upon me the day I was born, and the day I die, and the day I shall be raised alive!

This is his affirmation that `he is a worshipper of Allah, the Mighty and Sublime, and that he is a creature created by Allah.

He (`Isa) will live, die and be resurrected, just like the other creatures that Allah has created. However, he will have peace in these situations, which are the most difficult situations for Allah's creatures.'

May Allah's peace and blessings be upon him

Ibn Kathir.



Of all the signs your hadith stops at just 1?

How about his conception?

His praying for food to descend from the sky?

Either your trainers don't teach you well or and you are bad students.

The tafsir has finished the whole story

Here is the tafsir for better understanding

(19:33) Peace be upon me the day I was born and the day I will die, and the day I will be raised up alive."

This speech in the cradle by Jesus was the sign to which the angel referred in( Ayat 21). As Allah intended to punish the children of Israel for their continuous wicked ways and evil deeds, He made a pious virgin girl of the family of Prophet Aaron, who had devoted herself to worship in the Temple under the patronage of Zachariah, bear a child and bring it before her people in order to concentrate the whole attention of the thousands of people assembled there on this extraordinary event. Then He made this new born child speak out even in the cradle that he had been appointed a Prophet. Though they had seen this wonderful sign of Allah, they rejected the Prophethood of Jesus and brought him to the court for crucifixion, and thus incurred the wrath of Allah.

But our people in the slavery religion of allah are against the fact that Jesus Christ was crucified, died and resurrected

AbuTwins:
David had already been married to at least seven known-named wives. (1 Samuel 18:27, 25:42-43, 2 Samuel 3:2-5.)

Then God gave him Saul's wives after Saul
"And I gave thee thy master's house, and thy master's wives into thy bosom, and gave thee the house of Israel and of Judah; and if that had been too little, I would moreover have given unto thee such and such things."
2 Samuel 12:8.

So how many wives did David have in total?
Is God for or against Polygamy?

If Polygamy is right for David how is it bad for others?
"Because David did that which was right in the eyes of the LORD, and turned not aside from any thing that he commanded him all the days of his life, save only in the matter of Uriah the Hittite. "1 Kings 15:5.

HISSCRIBE1995

Ask Muhammad in grave why he disobeyed the idol (allah) he forced on you slaves after his idol compulsory and mandated maximum of FOUR WIVES for you slaves as he married over TEN WIVES without counting numerous concubines at his disposal

Antilslaam:


But your allah wish to have a son

Quran 39:4
If Allah had willed to choose a son, He could have chosen what He would of that which He hath created. Be He Glorified! He is Allah, the One, the Absolute.

Meanwhile your allah has daughters

Quran 37:153 Muhammad Asad
“He has chosen daughters in preference to sons”

Quran 37:153 Wahiduddin Khan
Has He chosen daughters over sons

Quran 37:153 Muhammad Ahmed & Samira
He chose/purified the daughters on/over the sons


AND THE DAUGTHERS ARE:

Quran 53:19-21
Have you then considered Lat and ‘Uzza And another, the third, Manat Are the males for you and for Him the females

Slave Jihadi AbuTwins, shey you'll ask your Alfa, imam, Utazh, sheikh, etc to explain the above verses for you so as not to come back here next time claiming that allah has no partner

Qasim6:


What is it with the If?
God says he has no son, so why waste your time with the ifs?

Q 21:26
And they say: the Merciful has adopted a son; glorified is He, but they are honoured servants.

The term "son of God" is just honorific title. That's how the Jews understood it, it's the pagan Romans that took the term to another level with Jesus.

Is like you get small sense than your fellow slaves, oya explain the below verses as read in Quran

Your allah wish to have a son

Quran 39:4
If Allah had willed to choose a son, He could have chosen what He would of that which He hath created. Be He Glorified! He is Allah, the One, the Absolute.

Meanwhile your allah has daughters

Quran 37:153 Muhammad Asad
“He has chosen daughters in preference to sons”

Quran 37:153 Wahiduddin Khan
Has He chosen daughters over sons

Quran 37:153 Muhammad Ahmed & Samira
He chose/purified the daughters on/over the sons


AND THE DAUGTHERS ARE:

Quran 53:19-21
Have you then considered Lat and ‘Uzza And another, the third, Manat Are the males for you and for Him the females

AbuTwins:


1. God does not need a son or helper in His dominion as He is All-Powerful to do all things!
2. Only Allah (God, the creator of All) alone deserves our entire worship!
3. God does not become man!
4. God does not debase Himself. He is at all times greater than all His creations!

But your allah wish to have a son

Quran 39:4
If Allah had willed to choose a son, He could have chosen what He would of that which He hath created. Be He Glorified! He is Allah, the One, the Absolute.

Meanwhile your allah has daughters

Quran 37:153 Muhammad Asad
“He has chosen daughters in preference to sons”

Quran 37:153 Wahiduddin Khan
Has He chosen daughters over sons

Quran 37:153 Muhammad Ahmed & Samira
He chose/purified the daughters on/over the sons


AND THE DAUGTHERS ARE:

Quran 53:19-21
Have you then considered Lat and ‘Uzza And another, the third, Manat Are the males for you and for Him the females

99thEnemy:

Where is Antichristian please?

The boy is no more