₦airaland Forum

FORWARDEVERLY:
Only fools (like you) have respect for Nigerian woemen...
Cry us a River...

He described their detention, prosecution, and trial as deliberate, adding that he has now assembled a legal team to seek redress.

Renowned human rights lawyer Femi Falana, SAN, has vowed to challenge what he describes as his “malicious” detention alongside late Chief Gani Fawehinmi (SAN) and three others during the military regime of General Ibrahim Babangida (retd.).

Speaking on Channels TV on Tuesday, Falana revealed that he and his colleagues were persecuted for opposing the annulment of the June 12, 1993, presidential election, which was won by Chief Moshood Kashimawo Olawale (MKO) Abiola.

He described their detention, prosecution, and trial as deliberate, adding that he has now assembled a legal team to seek redress.

Falana lamented that 32 years later, Babangida now admitted to regretting the annulment of the election.

He stated that Babangida deliberately nullified the election results and arrested, detained, charged and paraded them as criminals.

Recalling the events of 1993, Falana narrated how he and his colleagues were taken to the Gwagwalada Chief Magistrate Court and charged with treasonable felony.

He disclosed that, since they had no access to legal representation, he and the late Gani Fawehinmi defended themselves and their colleagues in court.

The human rights lawyer insisted that Babangida’s actions had long-term consequences for Nigeria’s democracy, adding that he is now seeking legal redress for the wrongful prosecution.

Falana said, "Even though we were asking for bail, we turned our arraignment to the trial of junta. And I recalled on that occasion, Chief Fawehinmi told the judge, Chief Magistrate Mallam Bulama that those who should be standing trial for treason, should be in the dock were in the Villa, led by General Babangida.

"Because they had sacked, they had overthrown a democratically elected government on December 31, 1983. So, those are the people that should be standing trial. And of course, when it came to my turn, I made it clear to the judge, this section of the law, Section 41 of the Criminal Code Act, which provides anybody who forms an intention to remove the president of his country, during his term of office, otherwise than by constitutional means.

"I said, my lord? The man calling himself my president has no fixed term of office. So, I couldn't have been brought here. Of course, the judge adjourned. Two weeks later, he granted us bail very liberally, N20,000 and one surety in like sum.”

The human rights lawyer noted that Babangida’s regime could not stand another proceeding.

"They couldn't go back to court, so that we don't turn the thing into a full trial of General Babangida and others. So, it simply ran away,” he said.

He added that the case was struck out.


"So, I am going to challenge the malicious prosecution. My malicious prosecution and that of my colleagues.

"I have assembled a team of lawyers. They are looking into it. Because he has now brought it to life by now admitting that there was no basis for my prosecution. Because he now says Abiola won the election, which was the basis of our protests.

“He is also saying, you know, it shouldn't have postponed the terminal date of his transition programme," he said.

"Which, again, we are fighting. So, which means there was no basis for our prosecution. It is malicious,” Falana said.

"Again, massive infringements of our rights, human rights. Because when you keep me in Kuje prison, you deny me my right to liberty, my freedom of movement. You also violate my right to choose the government of my country.

"Point to Article 13 of the African Charter on Human Rights. Because the man who did it has just come out to say, I did it wrongly,” he said.

Falana further explained that, echoing the ruling of the court in Abuja in the case of Femi Falana vs. Republic of Benin and others, the court stated that any violation occurring after three years cannot be pursued in the jurisdiction.

"But later, you know, the improvement of the jurisprudence of the court has now come to the conclusion. I think that was in the case of Federation of Journalists, you know, Gambia and the government of that country that once you are talking of serious abuse of human rights, statute of limitation does not apply," Falana added.

Antoeni:
Nice One, Sue That Irresponsible & Indisciplined Nuisance, Who Have No Respect For Women.

Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan has filed a lawsuit against the President of the Senate, Senator Godswill Akpabio, for alleged defamation.

The PUNCH reports that Akpoti-Uduaghan raised concerns after her Senate seat was reassigned following a reshuffle triggered by opposition members switching to the majority wing.

She resisted the relocation, leading to a confrontation between her and the Senate President.

However, in a suit filed before the Federal Capital Territory High Court on 25 February 2025, the President of the Senate, the Federal Republic of Nigeria, and the Senior Legislative Aide to the Senate President, Mfon Patrick, were listed as the second and third defendants

Uduaghan, through her lawyer, Victor Giwa, alleged that defamatory statements were made by the Senate President and published by his aide on Facebook.

According to him, the post, titled “Is the Local Content Committee of the Senate Natasha’s Birthright?” included a statement suggesting that Akpoti-Uduaghan believed being a lawmaker was only about “pancaking her face and wearing transparent outfits to the chambers.”

Giwa argued that the statement was defamatory, provocative, and disparaging, lowering his client’s dignity in the eyes of her colleagues and the public.