Baldwretch's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Baldwretch's Profile › Baldwretch's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 25 pages)
Bish42:I'd love to hear more on what I have put in bold-face. How do you know? Have you traveled to Russian cities? |
@Samueltemi337, my guy, how far? Would you mind if I get you a brand new British Airways? ![]() |
DeltaBachelor: ![]() ![]() |
Samantha125:Bye. Good night. ![]() |
Samantha125:When you had to sacrifice or part away with something of value, then, O then, you remember having a mode of operation. Isn't that funny? ![]() If I had told you that my dog is critically ill and needs your prayers, would you parrot this opinion even though you don't know me from Adam and we've never met? No, you wouldn't. Wouldn't you pray for a total stranger? Isn't that a request too? You would probably be like "No P bro! I would pray for your dog." ![]() But because I am asking for a measure of value, something that would cost you much, plenty, then you have a manner you do your stuff. If you want to know what the lady should have done, send me 10k. I am broke. I would use myself as a prime example to teach you what the lady should have done. Unfortunately, I would soon go offline. Reply quick. |
Samantha125:People kill others for no reason. Why would you need a reason to help someone? Help me. |
Samantha125:Charity does not need a "why." ![]() Help me, please. I am serious. ![]() |
Samantha125:I am damn broke. Please can you assist me with 10k? No jokes. |
Samantha125:Oh, okay I see! I see! You're probably among those who say: "Okay. Mtcheeww, did I ask him to help me? That's his business. What does he deserve? What does he deserve besides a "thank you"? But let me ask you: Is "thank you" a reward for labour? If I work in your farm from dawn to dusk, would I accept "thank you" as a payment for my efforts? Like, do people get paid with a "thank you"? You can withdraw the money he gives, but can you withdraw "thank you" in the bank and use it to get by? But what has been handed to you with little or no efforts is commensurate with wages earned for actual efforts. Just saying thank you and shoving everything under the carpet is a very, very cold, detached, compliment that is very unappreciative of genuine human sacrifices. We have absolutely lost it in this day and age. Talk, as they say, is cheap. People need to understand that you genuinely appreciate their efforts beyond the two words (thank you) that come from your lips. That is what they deserve. |
Samantha125:Funny. ![]() Humans struggle from dawn to dusk to get money. All our lives, from cradle to adulthood, we have to struggle and wrestle with vigour to earn enough to get by, to be independent, to afford the basic things of life and here you are talking as if anyone owes anyone anything let alone the ultimate measure of value - which is money. If you don't respect their persona, at least respect their sacrifices. It cost and takes a lot from them and from anyone else to get money legitimately. Anyone who gives you money without your sweating it out or you breaking your brows deserves more than a thanks or a T or a common compliment. That is characteristics of... |
Samantha125:O common! What you said isn't even necessary - just walk out on him or spit in his pitiful face. ![]() |
helinues:Based on what I have bolded, I would presume - you are a professional freelancer. If I may ask, not doubting your earnings, what do you do as a freelancer? |
Walai:The fellow is probably freelancing on Upwork.com or one of these freelance websites. He is earning the dollar equivalent for his labour in Naira while he lives in Nigeria. I still insist that he made a very poor financial decision. He could have put this client on hold, or outsource the job to someone else, or do anything within his ability to see to it that the said client never leaves. Three-and-a-half million earned within three months in this country is quite huge regardless of how much "pepper" you hands might have touched and regardless of where you live. How many people earn a million naira monthly in Obodo-Nigeria as we speak? I'd say less than one percent of the general population, or you don't agree? |
Walai:We are praying to God to make a way for us. But rejecting a three months contract as a senior developer that should pay you 3.5 million naira is very, very unwise. I don't know, should we call this foolishness, stupidity, both, or what? Isn't this just about coding? On a device? What are you even purchasing to do this task besides the use of your God-given brain? And this guy would probably be required to do all he would be doing virtually - through the online space. I say this because you hinted of him getting paid in dollars. NO, this is very unacceptable. Some extremely poor decisions (financial) wear the dirty garment of stupid confidence (of getting hired elsewhere) and extremely (un)wise business negotiation skills. ![]() Tell him to pull off that garment, or has he gotten what he does for a living? ![]() This bro's wants to pay 200 naira for your wares and you're insisting he pays 250 naira. If he pays 200 naira, you only make a profit of 70 naira. Well, seventy naira is not good profit so you insist he pays 250. After haggling back and forth and no headway, he goes away. Omo naso the banana take spoil, nobody buy am! ![]() |
dhope:670k? Are you really serious? Sir, what are your demands? I would not reject even 500k paid straight to my account monthly (for anything) unless the employer's demand is quite weighty; maybe like he wants me to travel to heaven on a rope of sand. ![]() |
GanagiBitrus:Exactly. They are just playing on our intelligence. Fifty pounds should get you at-least three local birds that are heavier than Shiney, even in Sunderland. It's all cruise. ![]() |
Grade3C:Do you have their permission before sharing their nudes? Would this be an offense to Baltasar and his mistresses? Would Baltasar (and his mistresses) give you a pat in the back for exposing their unclothedness for whatever reasons? Would you be able and willing to approach and ask their forgiveness in person, not by proxy, should God require you to do this before he even forgives you? Do you have the right to wrong him in this way? Is he a pornographic actor that you're doing this to him? ![]() What are you doing? ![]() |
CoronaVirusPro:I didn't hop into this thread just because I need to get a good laugh. Don't make me laugh, please. ![]() Alcohol has no place in Yobe state (because the Quran says so) but the sea-snake, the camel, the prawn, the oysters, the lobsters, the crabs, the periwinkles, the rabbit or even the snake has a place? |
ajailer:The ultimate goal of imposing tariffs is not to make more money for the government - at-least not in the long run. In a self-reliant or almost self-reliant country like the US, tariffs would serve its purposes - it would discourage purchase of certain imported items and boost local production of these products because the ones being imported would be more expensive compared to locally sourced ones. That is going to be the case because the US dollar is the medium of exchange and is not susceptible to fluctuation like other currencies. Besides, most citizens can afford the US dollar because it is the... LEGAL TENDER! ![]() When a country relies lesser on imported products and more on what its citizens produce, everyone fares well and everyone is happy. What you said of Trump doing same for the US is false equivalence. Just because we have been unable to stoke local production of vehicles in a way that discourages importation does not mean that America would experience similar fate. We have been unable to stoke local production of almost everything we used to import in the past, not just vehicles. A lot of countries, and I mean a lot, are less reliant of importation and these countries aren't even at the standards of the US, economically speaking. Nigeria's problem is more than a peculiar problem. So many nuances and variables at play. Don't compare them. ![]() |
ajailer:No, they wouldn't. It's all propaganda. A man who's down cannot fall. He's down already. If you take a look at that board on President Trump's hands, it reads: Reciprocal tariffs. America has been absorbing these tariffs from the countries on that board for months and even for years. Increasing it in retaliation by a notch would not make any difference. A country absorbing as high as 40% on tariffs (on all products it imports) would not suddenly pass out if you decide to make it 60%, 70% or even more. They have been at it for years so it is not going to move jack. Trump's got to be the wisest man alive. I doff my hat for him. It's all noise. Nothing is going to happen. The US would not feel a prickle of heat from this brouhaha unless these countries conspire to stop sending products into the country altogether. Na propaganda bros. |
neolboy:If she didn't tell you, would you have known? NO! I guess you wouldn't. I am beginning to agree with my friend Dolu who said that no good deed goes unpunished. ![]() Man would often get punished for the good (and kindness) which he does to his fellow man. ![]() |
The Holy Spirit is not a good Jinn! Yeah, the Holy Spirit is not a good evil spirit. ![]() |
akwesenana:Brighton vs Aston Villa over 2.5 odd is that big because it is quite big. ![]() Have I answered your inquiry? |
Samueltemi337: ![]() More interesting or less interesting? The Don't-Rejoice-Yet fellows, the Dem-Go-Still-Cancel-The-Goal crews are coming for your neck! |
Kaido:Betking's gonna palpitate paying your winnings and mine, too. I think with diligence and proper stakes management, it should pay off. One cannot be unlucky every-time na. ![]() |
In an unrelated post that hit front page today, you challenged a Christian to comparative religion debate. I am stupefied. Wow! I didn't know we have gurus on this platform. Where have you been, I have been on the lookout for people like you. ![]() In your challenge, you said [quote author= abuhlawal post=134770540]You swore that you were a Muslim before getting access here, have you realize that you started decieve yourself before everyone. Do you think there is any deception greater than you decieving yourself like you have just done. For comparative religious debate, if you get mind and know you are on the right path, DM me and get clarity over your religion from your own religious Book Follow the rules and be safe God bless you[/quote]You seem like a really good fellow. And then you repeated yourself again: [quote author= abuhlawal post=134770540]Ok ooo For comparative religious debate, if you get mind and know you are on the right path, DM me and get clarity over your religion from your own religious Book. I will not quote a single verse from the Qur'an. If you get mind check my signature and DM me. Follow the rules and be safe God bless you[/quote]Someone is shitting on your religion and all you're saying is "God bless you." You seem like a great chap. A different breed. That being said, that guy no get mind but me I get mind die. So I challenged Muslims today and this is what I said: [quote author= Baldwretch post=134770540]Barka da Eid-Fitr dear Muslim readers. ![]() My eran odun is still in limbo. You'd have given me enough meat and even more to spare without having to see me in person if you answer these questions through this online platform:1. God gave Moses certain laws for all of mankind. These laws can be likened to an order. In fact, some of these orders were given long before Moses was born. During the time when Noah and the patriarchs walked the earth. As to the bold-faced, please see this post: https://www.nairaland.com/8306103/torah-supposed-benefit-all-mankind 2. Some parts of the Torah have been corrupted, but not all parts of it. The Quran confirms some parts of the Torah and since it confirms some parts of the Torah, not all parts have been corrupted as even the Quran agrees. For if all parts of the Torah have been corrupted, then the parts the Quran confirms as authentic are also corrupted which means the Quran itself is corrupted. ![]() The order in question (as given to Moses) have not been corrupted. It is not the case of a textual corruption which puts the blame squarely on man's sinful tendencies and absolves God of all blame. 3. Muhammad contradicts these laws. I used an illustration to show that even the devil doesn't give or permit his subordinates to give orders and counter orders in his realm. 4. Regardless of human locale, environment, or settings, God does not contradict or modify his laws which are the foundation of his government. 5. The conclusion is therefore necessary: Muhammad could not have been from God. If you object to my argument, please let me hear yours. Your beautiful arguments is my eran odun![/quote]@abuhlawal, shey you get mind like this? ![]() |
Barka da Eid-Fitr dear Muslim readers. ![]() My eran odun is still in limbo. You'd have given me enough meat and even more to spare without having to see me in person if you answer these questions through this online platform:1. God gave Moses certain laws for all of mankind. These laws can be likened to an order. In fact, some of these orders were given long before Moses was born. During the time when Noah and the patriarchs walked the earth. As to the bold-faced, please see this post: https://www.nairaland.com/8306103/torah-supposed-benefit-all-mankind 2. Some parts of the Torah have been corrupted, but not all parts of it. The Quran confirms some parts of the Torah and since it confirms some parts of the Torah, not all parts have been corrupted as even the Quran agrees. For if all parts of the Torah have been corrupted, then the parts the Quran confirms as authentic are also corrupted which means the Quran itself is corrupted. ![]() The order in question (as given to Moses) have not been corrupted. It is not the case of a textual corruption which puts the blame squarely on man's sinful tendencies and absolves God of all blame. 3. Muhammad contradicts these laws. I used an illustration to show that even the devil doesn't give or permit his subordinates to give orders and counter orders in his realm. 4. Regardless of human locale, environment, or settings, God does not contradict or modify his laws which are the foundation of his government. 5. The conclusion is therefore necessary: Muhammad could not have been from God. If you object to my argument, please let me hear yours. Your beautiful arguments is my eran odun! |
Barka da Eid-Fitr dear Muslim readers. ![]() My eran odun is still in limbo. You'd have given me enough meat and even more to spare without having to see me in person if you answer these questions through this online platform: 1. Who you think the Holy Spirit is and how does he act. It's a personal question directed at you. 2. I am asking why Muslims do not have the Holy Spirit and do not even claim that they do. 3. I need your opinion on what you think of the varied claims made by some Christians that they have the Holy Spirit dwelling in them. Do you think this claim by so-called Christians is false? If you think these claims are true, I mean that they indeed have the Holy Spirit, do you think the Holy Spirit, if it is Gabriel as you might reply, dwells in their bodies as a spirit, or as what? If you think Christians who say they have the Holy Spirit are lying and that these do not have the Holy Spirit dwelling in them, what do you think dwells in them? If it is not a Jinn, then what is it? if it is a Jinn, what exactly is a "good Jinn" supposed to do in a Christian's life if he is not there to torment him? If this Jinn is not tormenting him, dwindling the quality of his life, or making life a living hell for him, wouldn't God's character be called into question for encouraging and cheering heads-on, by a good Jinn, those whom he is angry with? And wouldn't the Christian misjudge and misidentify this Jinn as an encouragement from his God when they are, in fact, signs of chastisement and future warnings? Would God be fair to punish them then? 4. Do you think Christians can receive God's spirit and not be at peace with God? Do you think a religion that receive Gabriel or Gabriel's Spirit do not and have not received divine authority, thinking logically? How can God send Gabriel to dwell in a Christian and that doesn't scream divine authority on the religion itself? Happy Eid Fitr my brothers, but I would felicitate more with you if you give me answers. |
Antichristian2:It looks like you are still indecisive on this subject. I asked Abdul a question. Abdul made his position known. I threw the question open here. You and RealLordZeus made it look like I am overgeneralizing - using one Muslim's opinion to form a consensus on what Muslims believe. Then, you suddenly make a U-turn affirming what Abdul believes. Are you with Abdul on the subject? His position is this: the Holy Spirit left the earth with the ascension of Jesus Christ. Any spirit, and all the spirits that inhabit Christians today are Jinns. Not all Jinns are bad, so they might not exhibit "bad" symptoms. The evil spirits that possess them, might, after all, be "good" evil spirit. Is that your position too? Antichristian2:You are asking a bad faith question that pretends to be unaware of what goes on in everyday interactions as humans. You're asking - when spirits possess humans, do they possess them from "under" "on top" "below" "from outside" or do they come and go? This is not a theoretical exercise. We see this almost every time. What I see you doing here is trying frantically to defend Islam by lighting candles to see the sun in the afternoon because you don't believe the sun is a superior source of light. And I say this based on your first question on this thread: you asked if I believed TB Joshua is a man of God. It appears that you have seen footage of him performing exorcism then. You have presumably seen demons talking, shouting, screaming, and doing all sorts through their victims. You have seen some women who have "Jinn" display some awkward behavior, so why are you pretending you don't have an answer to this rhetorical question? It is the fact that these Jinns are in their victim, that is what gives them authority over their victim. That is common knowledge. What I am getting at is obvious: these demons, as we can observe, inhabit their victims in the same way other spirits, the Holy Spirit, inhabit people, too. ![]() When the records (and even human experience) as we have it say that God pours out spirit (whether the spirit is a Jinn or it is not) on people which inhabit them, and then someone is coming along to say - in the second scenario - that God no longer pours out his spirit or that God pours his spirit in a different away other than what we know and have observed, then you know for sure that he is a liar. If God poured out his spirit on Moses and on Joshua and on many devote men years ago, why would he just stop today? Regardless of where you think the spirit is poured out in - whether it is under, over, on top, in the fact, outside, in the night or whatever - I honestly do not understand why you think it is perfectly reasonable to hold the belief that God used to pour out his spirit in the past but has stopped totally today? You cannot get more illogical than this. If you don't agree, could you kindly explain why Muslims do not have God's spirit and do not even claim to. On your screenshot: the scriptures doesn't even have to make that clear at all - that the spirit is in him. Spirits inhabit people internally by definition and by experience as I have explained. You are trying to play hide and seek with words, meanings, with atheistic apprehension of everyday experience in spiritual matters. The screenshot you shared neither translates the entire Hebrew passage of that verse from the Hebrew nor does it even attempt to. All you did is type specific words for their meaning on your concordance from a different English translation. This is bad faith argument. You shouldn't have done that. When I read your words, "trinitarian extrapolation," I knew that a concordance of different bible translations would not help here. I, however, have the Jewish Tanakh (translated into English) sitting in my device. It is the Hebrew bible, divided into Law, Prophets, and Writings, with no new testament therein. It is what English-speaking Jews use. The Jewish translators neither have "trinitarian" ideology as the Christians might have, nor do they even believe in Jesus Christ. This is how it reads: Baldwretch:This is as clear as light. In whom is spirit. Whom is the objective case of "who." You are quite literate. Antichristian2:You are asking silly questions. Does God have to help, save, or deliver anyone whether they have his spirit or they do not have it? No, of course, not. The act of pouring out his spirit on his creature is an act of mercy, but God doesn't even have to do that and much less deliver anyone or inform those he has poured out his spirit of certain disaster befalling them simply because he has poured out his spirit on them. He would inform them if he so pleases. Did God create Samson to live eternally? Is God under obligations to inform Samson of certain danger because Samson is filled with his spirit? You are asking trash question. Doesn't God reserve the rights to hide information from whomsoever he chooses even if they have his spirit? Don't we see this in the life of the prophets? The prophet Elisha, who, in my opinion, performed more miracles than other Jewish prophet - He would tell the king of Israel what other kings were conspiring in their bedroom chamber; he knew when a murderer was sent to kill him; Elisha has this to say to his servant Gehazi Baldwretch:If we would be asking silly questions of this sorts, we should be asking why God didn't tell Elisha what the problem is since Elisha has the spirit. When people start asking Why God didn't do certain things then we know that they just want to argue.
|
Apologies, I am carrying over your comments in the other thread here. So you said: Antichristian2:Now, this is some next-level, eloquent, grandiose, logically-incoherent nonsense. ![]() In its practical ramification: Are you with Abdul on the subject or are you saying something different? I mean, If only Jinns can possess humans as the you said in your third sentence which I have put in bold-face, are you saying that the Jinns that possess Christians are good Jinns? I am asking again because these "Jinns" apparently do not dwindle the quality of their life in anyway. They live perfectly normal lives like any other person does. Again, I am not going to use Christianity to prove that Christianity is true. That is bad-faith argument and would not make much sense. I would prefer to use Ol' fashion Judaism. ![]() See what God said of Joshua: Baldwretch:Question: Is this a Jinn? Answer: Clearly, NO! Another question: Where is this so-called spirit? Answer: It is in him. Dwelling in him. This essentially rebuffs your claims that only Jinns could inhabit humans since Joshua has a spirit and the spirit is not a Jinn. I don't have to use other passages of scripture to prove this. However, here's another one: When the complaints against Moses became too much, God told Moses to forward the names of seventy elders who would be sharing leadership responsibilities with him. Hear what God said to Moses in Numbers 11:17 Baldwretch:The spirit is in Moses. It is in him! In fact, it so happened that seventy men were filled up with a measure of the Holy Spirit that was upon Moses that they prophesied. I would not bother to quote the Book of Judges that chronicles the life of the Judges before Kings ruled in Israel with copious amounts of "the Holy Spirit came upon so-and-so and he did so-and-so." ![]() It is enough to just say that all of them had what the bible calls the Holy Spirit since the passages in question says so. All the prophets had God's Spirit, the Holy Spirit. All of them. That should be given. They are prophets, after all. ![]() All devote men before Jesus Christ with whom God is particularly pleased with had his spirit, the Holy Spirit. All of them. During the reign of the Kings, when they reigned in Israel, the anointed kings had God's spirit, the Holy Spirit, in them, all of them. In fact, at one time when David slept with another man's wife and killed the man to cover up his sins, he begged God not to take the Holy Spirit away from him. If he didn't have it, he wouldn't be begging God not to take it away when he sinned. I am talking of what is now known as the most penitent Psalm in the entire bible. Psalm 51. He says: Baldwretch:Read this particular Psalm like 1, 000 times. If it pleases God to make you a Christian, he would send the Holy Spirit into you. I am not kidding you. That said, the difference between the Holy Spirit and a Jinn has never been more apparent and clear when we consider the life of Saul who was anointed. Baldwretch:Unfortunately, the adherent of the Islamic religion do not have the first spirit that was upon Saul because the religion itself doesn't have God's authority, only the second. God sends his spirit with whom he has a pact with, or with whom he is particularly interested in. He withdraws his spirit on whom he is particularly displeased with. That is common sense. You can see that if the first spirit does what the second one does, the first spirit wouldn't have departed from him. Their roles are as farther apart as the east is from the west. The promise of God pouring out his spirit upon more humans by Jewish prophets of old is a recurring theme in their mouth. Jesus Christ simply reiterated and actualized that promise when he died. Please see Joel 2:28-32; Ezekiel 36:26-27; Isaiah 32:15; Isaiah 44:2-3 and isolated passages of Jeremiah. I haven't even used any New Testament passages to buttress my claims. That said, you have to realize that God's will must never suffer at the expense of his choice or his choice at he expense of his will. Like you and I, God has a choice. Who he wants to approach him. He also has a will. What he wants to get done. God must first choose who would worship or approach him and the chosen must worship him as he has prescribed. It's just like a man who is unmarried and when asked why, says, the women who have good character are not his specs and his specs have bad character. God would not suffer for man's unbelief, sins, and rebellion so that he has to settle for anything less. ![]() Please answer the question I asked you earlier. |
Antichristian2:No, you have not answered me. Granted, Muhammad thinks the Holy Spirit is angel Gabriel - the angel with six hundred wings - but what that even means or how Gabriel's mode of operation plays out is not clear. Is it that Gabriel dwells in the believer from within, comes and goes, or strengthens the believers from outside, or what? Please explain. I am asking who you think the Holy Spirit is and how he acts. It's a personal question directed at you. I am also asking why Muslims do not have this Holy Spirit and do not even claim they do. Also, I asked your opinion, what you think of the varied claims made by some Christians that they have the Holy Spirit dwelling in them. Do you think this claim by so-called Christians is false? If you think these claims are true, I mean that they have the Holy Spirit, do you think the Holy Spirit, Gabriel, dwells in their bodies as a spirit, or as what? If you think Christians who say they have the Holy Spirit are lying and that these do not have the Holy Spirit dwelling in them, what do you think dwells in them? If it is not a Jinn, then what is it? Do you think Christians can receive God's spirit and not be at peace with God? Do you think a religion that receive Gabriel or Gabriel's Spirit do not and have not received divine authority? How can God send Gabriel to dwell in a Christian and that doesn't scream divine authority on the religion itself? |
