Baldwretch's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Baldwretch's Profile › Baldwretch's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 25 pages)
Ohyoudidnt:Clearly, you do not have a defense. You are still on - Well, Islam is right because even Christianity does not observe Kosher. ![]() You know I asked you a question earlier: How many people have to believe the wrong stuff for it to become true? ![]() If all Christians believe an untruth (of God's law), does it make it true for Muslims? Clap for yourself. . Besides, the reasons Christians do not observe Kosher is different, radically different from the Islamic perspectives; just like the reason the pig is unclean for both faiths. If, on the Day of Judgment, God asks the Christian why he eats pork and doesn't observe Kosher, his defense would be quite different from the Muslim's. Well, the Christians eat pork that's why we also eat it is very inexcusable. I just put you in a corner where you either have to assume the most debased, fickle, inconstant, depraved character of Godthe Almighty or of Muhammad, and you have refused to take sides. THANK GOD FOR YOUR GOOD SENSES! YOUR HEAD CORRECT! |
Ohyoudidnt:Did I tell you I am a Christian? Even if I am a Christian, I am not arguing from a traditional Christian position. Pretend you are talking to an orthodox Jew. Appeal to what you believe. Christianity says that is the case does not make it so. Christianity's truths are not Islamic truths. Appeal to what you believe. Edit: [/b]Well, I would defend your counters from a traditional Christian position, but not yet. ![]() We must stop this act of deflecting arguments. Counter. Just counter me, don't say well your own religion says the same thing. [b]We can all be wrong |
Ohyoudidnt:I am currently low on data. I wouldn't be able to pull up Quranic verses on websites for fear of running out of data completely. . This new data hike, my eyes have seen wien.That being said, this is the first order to the world of mankind: Baldwretch:Meanwhile, the spirit that inspire Muhammad inspired him to say this: AntiChristian:You cannot defend this. Doing so would be like trying to have your cake, eating everything at once, and then putting it in the refrigerator for show at a later time. Oga, your cake is in your stomach, not in your refrigerator. In the first command and just like reptiles and animals that walk on all four, sea creatures, most of them, are forbidden including the crab, periwinkles, Oysters of all kinds, the sea-snakes (lol), Molluscs of all kinds, etc, etc. In fact, this command is rigid only certain kinds of fishes can be eaten. God is covertly saying that only certain kind of fishes, of all sea creatures that live in the water, can be eaten. Muhammad is saying quite the opposite. Both cannot be true. He could NOT have been inspired by the real Gabriel to contradict what has been made clear. An impostor spirit does not need to (or have to) contradict every command that was given. One command, just one, is more than enough to expose him. This command is more than a sad commentary of what Moses thinks of sea animals. It is a command from God himself. Read the very first verse of that chapter. Another one: God says of the camel in that same chapter. Verse 4. Baldwretch:In the Quran Muhammad repeatedly (in several Surahs) talks of the camel as pack animals to cherish, to eat in a sacred place, and to handle lightly. The God who instructed us not to eat this animal (with clearly stated reasons) could not have inspired his angel to contradict his earlier position. That is thinking the unthinkable. Perish the thought! And like I said, an impostor spirit does not have to contradict every law that God had given. One contradiction is enough. I would not be able to pull up Quranic verses on websites which might be data-zapping due to data constraints to prove Muhammad's approval of the camel, but they are right there on Google. Google it. And then we have the subject of men re-marrying the women they have once divorced even if these women had married someone else after the first husband divorced them. The Bible says no, don't do it. It is detestable before God, but the Quran permits it. Let me quote two verses of the bible that forbids it: Jeremiah three verse one. Also, Deuteronomy 24. Verse 3. I have omitted verse one and two. Deu. 24 vs. 3. Baldwretch:The book of Jeremiah chapter three and verse one reiterates this sentiment differently. In the Quran, Muhammad cheers you on, saying yes you can re-marry her even if another man had married her. These are not abstract laws like in the field of Mathematics where the questioner is asking you to prove Minkowsky's inequality or Pythagoras theorem. These laws were made to tackle real-life situations that humans often find themselves enmeshed in. Two contradictory laws cannot be both true. Clearly, if God would send angels, the angel would say what the Lord his God has instructed him to say and nothing more. God would not send an angel to counter what he sent an earlier angel to say. NO! God would never screw his government in the most debased of ways. He always upholds his laws, being the foundation of his government. I have not bothered to read the Quran but I am quite sure that if I did, I would find many more worms and filth that indicate an impostor spirit. |
Ohyoudidnt:Okay, good. We are getting there. We might be on the same page soon. An impostor spirit (or prophet) would eventually reveal himself, yes. You are very right. He did eventually reveal his true self not just by different accounts of historical account. That can be taken. He did reveal himself by the laws he countered. Sorry, by the laws he gave. Clearly, proving his lack of authority. I started a thread https://www.nairaland.com/8313525/gods-orders-counter-order-proves-muhammmad Proving that he is who he is - an impostor. I would encourage you to read it. We started off the discussion with one law - the sea creature. And then I capped it off with another, the camel. I rounded off the post with this biting comment: Baldwretch:In the thread I am directing you to, I summarized my post in twelve lines. Let me share it here. Baldwretch:Please go through that thread or only the comments I made in the thread. There is just so much for you to ponder and think over if you are sincere. Clearly, an angel who inspires a law that contradicts laid down instruction for all of mankind given even before we have the Lawgiver, Moses, is an impostor spirit. ![]() |
Ohyoudidnt:Ex-kiss me sir! Ex-kiss me sir! You have not said anything. Ex-kiss me sir! Ex-kiss me sir! All you did is assume and then proceed to talk in detail about what you have just assumed. WOW! How convenient? Oh no, not very convenient! I wish I could explain this stuff to you like a man explains basic arithmetic to a five-year-old. He was inspired in the Cave of Hira which had caves insides caves inside caves - ten thousand caves embedded in total, I agree! He was asked to recite the Quran when he had no mouth, I agree. It's true. He met the holy one, the great Jubril, a fearsome and terrible angel with ten million wings, it's true. Muhammad saw him and I can relate! ![]() These claims and many more are not up for dispute. I agree with these claims and more. You are right. I do not argue these with you. After all, it's not as if we are talking of natural events here. What I am arguing is that this so-called angel that appeared to him might be an impostor. I mean, an angel from the devil or from other sources claiming to be an angel from God. And since he is claiming to be who he is not, the so-called angel would have to be very consistent (in words and in deed) with the persona which he claims to represent - an angel from God. An angel who claims to be Jubril in words, but who is not, would try as much as he can to be the angel Jubril in deeds. That is speaking definitionally. Then, I proceeded to posit that we cannot know (and neither can Muhammad) if this fearsome angel is from God or from the devil just by the staggering powers he exercises on Muhammad, or by the rules and laws he enacts from his Lord or by... and more. We cannot know things that are beyond us. We can, however, identify sources by the authority they possess. Unfortunately, the angel that appeared to him couldn't prove the authority they posses. For instance, an angel who has authority over the waters would exercise his overreaching power over the waters in a way that angels who do not have authority over the waters do not and could not. All Godly angels whether the lower or higher ranked ones have been commuted some authority that evil angels do not enjoy. One of such is the ability to be made manifest in the physical plain to humans. Unfortunately, the angel that appeared to Muhammad could not demonstrate this authority. That is what evil angels can not do. Since the angel revealed himself to Muhammad and to only him, he is definitely not from God. This is actually one of the ways God restrains them otherwise they would screw his government since their appearance would justify man's proclivity to unbelief. If you saw the devil in his glory today and you tow his path worshiping and praying to him, wouldn't that warrant what could be called - justified unbelief, or do you think that it's a coincidence that animals cannot talk? His eloquent words, sharp rebuke, threats of Hell, his immense glorification of God, his detailed code of conduct for the believers and many more are not definitive proofs that God sent him. These, in and of themselves, are not definitive proofs of the angel's authority. That being said, It seems false prophets have a knack for usurping authority and claiming to be a co-central authority by contradicting what has been made plain and prescribing their own laws. The devil can replicate the exact same command that God gave to Moses word for word if he is going to be the authority on the subject. Do you get the objection now? The fact of a matter should be established by more than one witness. He cannot be the only witness to a divergent path that God has prepared for his people. If Muhammad (and us) would tow a radical path that has not been towed before, then this calls for a greater witness. Extraordinary demands calls for extraordinary evidence. |
Ohyoudidnt:I am not actually questioning how Muhammad figured the angel's identity as Gabriel; I am asking how he could tell that the angel who appeared to him is from God and not from other sources. These are two different, but inter-related questions. Granted, an angel appeared to him; granted, the angel identified his name as Gabriel; granted, there was a metaphysical influence around the events that indicates that the experience is more than natural, but how do we know that this angel and the experience he had is of God and not from the Devil, or from other sources? An impostor spirit claiming to emanate from and speak for the one true God with a terribly strong metaphysical influence is possible. That is the state of the question. Let me use an example. When the angel of God appeared to Moses in the Burning Bush; the bush was burning but was never burning up. Moses was like - wow, what in the world is going on here. How can a bush be burning for this long and not get burnt up, so he goes over and takes a very good look. Turns out, it is of God. Ah w,ait a seconds, did I just say that it is of God? Well, hold on for a minute. It might not be. Suppose someone who wasn't there when the events happened or suppose some who witnessed the event turn around and claims that the bush did in fact burn and never got burnt up as alleged. Suppose the person's conclusions on the events is polar opposite to Moses' conclusions that the metaphysical influence on Moses and all the circumstances surrounding the events are from the Devil, not from God. It happened yes, but it is just not from God. Would it be a reasonable and credible arguments he's making? Yes, it would be. But why? To some degrees, the Devil is also able to replicate the same. So how could we convince this doubting Thomas that the events and the metaphysical influence and all that as experienced by Moses the servant of God is from God and not from the Devil? That is the state of the question. You see the thing is, no matter how much evil spirits like to wander and disrupt the divine government, they are still under God's authority and have been restrained from doing certain things. I would like to think that it is not just that they have been restrained, but they are incapable, by virtue of God's overreaching power, of doing certain things they would naturally want to do. Do evil spirits exist? YES! But if an evil spirit wants to appear to maybe thousands or millions today as God did before the sight of all the Israelite, would he be able to accomplish or replicate the same? NO! Why not? He doesn't have that authority. God is still on the throne and he very much restrains them. If Muhammad claims that an angel from God appeared to him with strong metaphysical influence; he might be right and he might be wrong, we would need more than his claims to believe. This spirit would have to convince not just him but us by the authority he spirit possess. The spirit would have to prove the authority he possess by appearing, in part, to some of us (or to some of the people who lived in Arabia during the time of Muhammad). If the devil or his angels wanted to appear to all of us or to all Nigerians today, they couldn't. They do not have such authority! Only God with the ultimate authority over everyone including the devil is able to do that. God is also able to commute some of those powers to his angels. The devil is absolutely unable to. He has been stripped of this power. No evil spirit or spirit from other sources posses that authority. ![]() You see where I am going: only Muhammad saw the angel Gabriel. Only Muhammad came under his metaphysical influence. Only Muhammad! It's only Muhammad! ![]() If that doubting Thomas doubted the theophany, the Burning Bush that I mentioned earlier, Moses could just say, okay your skepticism is justified. Wait. Just be patient. Don't worry. You would see the glory of God with your own two korokoro eyes and then you'd believe. In the book of Surah Al-Torah chapter 1 verse 1 and chapter 25, 72, and 1000 of the holy Quran of that Surah, in my own translation, the New Living Translation of the holy Quran, it says: ![]() And the glory of the Lord appeared to all the Israelite as they grumbled in their tents. In another Surah, Surah Al-Exodus, it says, To the Israelite at the bottom of the mountain, the glory of the Lord appear like glittering fire while the summit appears like gleaming amber. There are just so many Surahs that says that God proved himself or his angels for other people to witness in the physical plain besides Moses indicating his absolute authority. That is how we differentiate the good from the bad, the righteous from the unrighteous, by the authority they possess. Not necessarily by the powers they exercise because (in that department) we do not have the ability to conclusively tell the difference. I wish I could meet you in person and talk sense into our head. Maybe, just maybe, if you are sincere you would renounce Islam and do a deeper introspection.Ohyoudidnt:Unfortunately, all of these attributes you mentioned do not indicate conclusively that God is the source. Contrary to what many think, the devil is not terribly bad who wants nothing but bloodshed, murder, thievery, slander, and all sorts of vices, unhinged and unabated. He could make demands of these and even more from those who might believe in him for different reasons than God's, for different purposes, to different ends, and if he would be the authority on the subject. It all boil down to authority wars. Doing what you think is right because "He said so" is far more important than doing the "right thing." If a man would come under metaphysical influence that is not of God, all of these demands and more would be demanded, with absolute strictness in the details, provided it is done because of him. The idea of a depraved, degenerate deity that commands and allows all sorts of vices and crimes have never been a human idea. It only exist in the imagination. ![]() |
harqinhola:Sorry, for some reasons beyond me, my response took longer than normal because I have been offline since I last made this post. Apologies! Give it to me woto-woto! A liar repeatedly reminds his listeners that what he is saying is the truth. Try to cross-examine a cheat and a liar and you would sooner find out that he's repeatedly reinforcing the false idea that all the facts on ground as presented by himself is true. It's all smoke and mirrors. It happens all the time. Unfortunately, that is not very much different from what we have here. You start off your argument based on what the Quran says about itself. Have you ever met a vendor who would honestly admit that his wares is very terrible, and below quality? Not very many! Most men think others are bad and vile, but themselves. Why should Muhammad be any different? How very convenient to use the Quran to prove that it is God who inspired Muhammad to write it! How very convenient to use the words of Muhammad to prove that it is God who possessed him in the writing of it! I have to ask you again though, is that how you argue to the truth of this question I asked? Namely, that the spirit that possessed Muhammad is of God and not from other sources? You are not appealing to the truth; your appeal is more to the claims the Quran makes about itself which is independent of the truth. Experience should teach you that claims are not necessarily true and even your claims are very unfalsifiable. Very, very circular argument. You state a premise. Draw an argument that is independent of the premise and then use the premise to prove that your argument is true. Which kind thing be this na! Could we verify that a particular angel is of God or is of the Devil by the metaphysical powers or influence surrounding how they were revealed to us? NO! If the devil sent his entourage, a company of angels, he would also exercise a mighty metaphysical grip upon you that is just enough to make you believe whatever. Could we know whether the angel before us is of God or is of the devil by the great powers that enabled us to identify them? NO! Metaphysical influence can be terribly strong and not find its source in God. Just because you find yourself grappling under great powers does not mean it is necessarily of God. The Devil has great powers too. When God performed mighty miracles before Pharaoh shortly before he was destroyed, Pharaoh's magicians did the same. Could you identify God's snake or the Devil's snake as they lay on the floor? NO! Are both of divine origin? YES! Is it easy to mistake one for the other? Yes. Why? They both exercise metaphysical influence. I could go on and on with countless examples. The Quran's teaching are not deeply moral. They are not. They are at variance with the bible. They tend to contradict what moral codes has been laid down for God's worshipers as it pertains to our obligations to God. And besides, morality is worthless if God is not the source of the morality. Two folks might agree on certain etiquette for different reasons. It is a common phenomenon. For instance, the Quran seems to agree with the Torah on one ceremonially unclean animal, the pig. Both scriptures agree, but for different reasons. It seems to me that the Quran forbids the pig due to its perceived uncleanliness (the pig, you know what I mean) whereas the Bible forbids it for an entirely different reasons - not chewing the cud. Here, you can see that both scripture agree but they do not really agree. What is preventing men from wife-sharing if the Quran says - yes, a man can re-marry his divorced wife even if she had remarried whereas the bible forbids it. It seems to me that the justice, kindness, and ethical standards you are talking about is all in your head. This is chaos-violence pro-max. I created a thread on God's order and counter order using two creatures - the sea creatures and the camel. No Muslim has been able to refute me. Maybe you can do that in the thread here since you think God is a deity who contradicts himself. The Quran would definitely command worship of a monotheistic, sovereign God because the human psyche naturally frowns at the idea of multiple gods or the idea of the gods having a son. Our psyche frowns at that. We cherish the idea of a powerful, all-wise, omniscient deity. This cringey attitude from the Quran is very much expected just as it cringes at the consumption of pork (pig meat). That doesn't make it true, though. The truth is independent of what we think. It's just like sports lovers who would tell you that the losing team, Team Y, would not want to lose the return leg of a football match because they lost the first leg. However, what they want is irrelevant and doesn't conclusively determine the outcome of the game. Even if the Quran forbids falsehood, it is for different reason than the God of the bible.The Quran might forbid falsehood because it creates a rippling disturbance in the community; meanwhile, the Jewish God would do same for different reasons. Spreading of Islam, you say. Lol. How many people have to believe a lie for it to become true? One hundred, or maybe one thousand, a million, a trillion? It doesn't matter that many people believe it or spread its claims. All of them can still be guilty of spreading the wrong religion. Appealing to popularity is not so wise. Sorry, I could not quote your write-up piece by piece because I am running out of time. |
This is a very serious question and should not be taken with levity whatsoever because everything in Islam rises and falls with this claim. Let me reiterate the question once more to my beautiful Muslim readers here: If a lying, top-ranked spirit impersonates the angel Gabriel (Jubril) claiming that he is, in fact, angel Gabriel, the holy one sent from God, how would Muhammad tell the difference? Or what if the spirit that communicated with Muhammad had been sent by the devil to disrupt God's earthly government and is claiming to be God's, how would you know? Or what if the spirit is, in fact, sent (from God) as a lying spirit for other purposes? If a man I had never seen before claims he is Donald Trump, how would I tell he is telling the truth or he is lying? Well, that would be easy peasy since I have seen Donald Trump's images and portraits on many occasions, but spirits might be virtually indistinguishable to humans, not just because we do not have senses that correctly identify them (maybe by their name as the case may be) independent of what the spirit says or claims he is, but for many reasons beyond us. If a man comes forward on this thread claiming that he is Joshua Bidemi; well, how would I know that he is telling me the truth or he is lying irrespective of what his username or his previous comments says? Well, the truth is, I would not know. I would have to be under some "powers" sort of to correctly identify factual claims of this sorts. Maybe the more important question then is, how do we know that Muhammad isn't under some demonic influence to tell apart a factual information that cannot be known by the senses? If God or the devil did, in fact, possessed him to identify this angel, how would he or even us know who's doing the possession? even in this day and age, people get demon possessed a lot, quite a lot. What if he was demon possessed to correctly or incorrectly identify the angel? A claim of revelation from a specific angel is a very, very, very tall claim. If angel Gabriel does, in fact, appear to me right now as I type this, and says he is angel Gabriel, how would I know? To be quite frank, I would not know and neither would you. I would have to take him at his words, accepting in blind faith whatever he says about himself because there is no way to scrutinize or examine a metaphysical being or examine the claims they make. If he is lying I wouldn't know. If he is telling the truth, I wouldn't know. I would just have to believe whatever he says. Believing whatever he says is not as important as who he is, in fact. We have to be cleared on who he is first before believing whatever he says since impersonation is quite a real possibility. I would appreciate responses. You see, a claim of revelation from a prophet is not enough because even the devil could reveal himself to whom he wants to deceive as is evident from demon possessed humans who do evil stuff at the behest of the devil. Some throw themselves into the fire, into water; some eat sand, eat poo, and do other unthinkable things at the devil's command or under his influence. How can it be said that the spirit that possessed Muhammad is not one of them? |
PheelzAlmighty:Dey play! Dey play, you hear. Africa is the terrible shit-hole it is, a very shitty place, a pitiful dumping-ground for many unclean sepulchers; a vile hunting ground for every unclean vulture, and this is because right from time, Africa is the haven for witchcraft and sorcery where every unclean bird seeks to get followers. No nation whose citizens practice practice divination, cast spell, interpret omens, call forth the spirit of the dead, worship evil spirits, have their altars, or even inquire of them, ever succeeds. NONE! This might be the only good thing in his record as the governor of Anambra state. |
donleo92:Could you work as a Sales boy or a Sales rep if the pay is right? |
AllBlack:Eerily similar to what played out between myself and ex-employer, but I was the one who terminated the contract not them. They would, for instance, send notifications on Whatsapp (not on Whatsapp) and then proceed to penalize me for missing shared information. At one point they deducted 5k from my salary because of two days' Resumption Workshop absence. I was increasingly dissatisfied with how they treated me, so I stalled until the holiday. Sent a para resignation on the very day they paid the previous month salary on discovering that another 5k or so was gone. The offer letter makes clear that either party may terminate or forfeit a month salary in lieu. I terminated. Gave a month notice. They replaced me immediately, but refused to pay that months' salary (which was a holiday) and could not have cared less. Holiday breaks are fully paid for, but they did not pay me. Kept reaching out to them and begging. For where! Of course, they covered their tracks at one point, but I would still sue them if I have the means. I hate injustice. |
AllBlack:Care to share why you sued them? What happened? As a classroom teacher in one school in the north, I am also on one which happened two years ago or so. In fact, I threatened to sue them and made it clear, but it seems they just do not give a Bleep. ![]() |
God1000:God made men a little lower than the angels and sin makes them a little better than the devil, that is sadly the case here. So calling for the genocide of the White race is okay because? On what grounds exactly? Because of what? Are you really okay? A major political party with its chair-head flaming the embers of division, bile, and hatred with so much carelessness, impunity, and recklessness is not that bad as long as it is directed towards those whom you hate. As long as it is America-trump directed. Have you lost your faculties? I would say it again and again and again, O deformed monster, what a pitiful, miserable state have you found yourself, God made you a little lower than the angels but sin has made you a little better than the devils. God1000:Slitting the throat of Whiteness is a blatant call for genocide. That is very unacceptable. Julius Malema should be tried and if found culpable, be dealt with appropriately. It is not the same as enacting policies that favour your countrymen at the detriment of others especially the illegal immigrants who migrated into your country. You are at liberty to talk trash if Pres. Trump were deporting African Americans too, but that is not at play here. Even Nigeria does it; all countries deport illegal immigrants, so why should America's case be any different? |
ScamDemicEra:For Guinness record, the highest you can steal is a million naira. Oops sorry, I wanted to say a billion.Abeg, no vex, na one trillion I been wan talk. ![]() Wetin dey worry me sef - na hundred trillion billion million. O-O-O-O-O! What is my problem sef, what is my fucking problem, na three hundred quadrillion trillion. . I don steal that one before. . Dem beat me eh!O yes, yes, now I know the answer to your question. Na hundred trillion Googol. If you steal hundred quadrillion Googolplex like one of my brothers, e no go still break the record because you still dey follow some people for back. Maybe we should ask Guinness because I don't know the answer to this queshion ooo |
ptolemy1:Liverpool isn't just topping the Championship where Plymouth Arygle is struggling really badly to break off from the relegation zone. They are topping the Premier League. They are topping a league Plymouth is sweating-out to get a chance to play in. Are you expecting them to barge in with full throttle on a team that is w-a-a-a-a-a-a-y below them? As they lost the match with their B or even C team players, wouldn't they still be able to walk and strut about with their shoulders held high on the premise that they actually lost because their main players weren't fielded? Have you thought of, and are you quite knowledgeable of how much pride and ego is imbued into bigger shots when they whip known smaller teams with their B or C team in the host's very home stadium? Is it really about the final results or all the little details between the lines that go unnoticed? Mr. Football is still an entertainment based game where pride, ego, skill, is still at play. It is not always about the result or match-fixing. That is en embarrassingly low thing to say. Insanely and staggeringly low line of thought. I am so ashamed to say this, but emancipate yourself from vile thoughts. There is nothing in football that quips that the better team always win. No, the better team doesn't always win. The better team doesn't always draw. They sometimes lose. Liverpool played good football and created more chances. They didn't deserve to lose, but they lost. Do they have to field in their bigger names when they could have easily done the job with B or C players? |
There is no point learning the Quran. You should read the bible instead. ![]() The Quran got its stories from the bible and from other textual sources. If you need pointers - where the Quran got each and every story it re-tells, please let me know. Haha! ![]() I would take my time to dig out its sources for you. All the stories that was re-told in the Quran already had sources long before Muhammad was born; he simply plagiarized these sources. Free free to ask question me any question. You are most welcome. ![]() |
MatrixCircle:We are talking of players who retired in the last 10 years and you pulled up an African that last played for the Super Eagles in, I think, 2005. You pulled up one who retired from active football in 2007. That is more than 15 years ago. Taribo West played professional football at a time football hadn't been monetized as we have it today. He played active football at a time players weren't getting paid as much as they are getting paid today. He played active football at a time inflation hadn't gotten this bad. And if he did retire in 2007 as we have it on record, it must logically be inferred that he last received good money playing active football at-least 20 years ago. That is twice as long as the cap you put on the YEARS LIMIT. If you want to raise the bar, fine. I would still argue with you, but there is nothing that shows that Taribo West is broke. Can you give me pointers? |
MatrixCircle:I must nutmeg you this night. Whether you close leg or you no close leg, that one no concern me. ![]() I would push the ball by force. The ball must surely enter your OC! ![]() By 73%, we are talking, breaking it down in tens; we are talking of seven out of ten professional footballers going bankrupt after ten years of retirement. This is 2025. Can you mention 1. One African or Hispanic/Latino player who played active football for at-least two or three years around 2015 or thereabout in top-flight footballing nation: England, Germany or Spain (less preferred) and who has declared bankruptcy. 2. Four Brits, Germans, or Spaniards who played active football for at-least four, five or six years in their country of birth or any high-paying footballing nation and has now declared bankruptcy. Not even factoring in inflation, the cost of living in the country of their birth is relatively higher than an African player who brings the home home; that's why I am raising the bar for the number of years of active football played. Also, the number of African players is relatively lower, that's why I am requiring more on their count. ![]() Think about it, when people churn out statistics to make a claim, it is because it is not true. |
MatrixCircle:A few months or years of labour is more than enough duration of time (some career) to put bread on your table and on the tables of all your dependents for a lifetime. It's not really about slaving for months, for years, or for decades, but how much you get paid when you actually work and I am not talking of their gross, but their net pay. Most professional footballers get in a week what regular doctors earn in a year. Just a week o! That is very unsettling and mind boggling if you think about it. A professional footballer of British or Spanish descent who lives in the same country or city as the club-side he retired from has earned more than enough money to stay afloat for many years. The weekly wages of retired professional footballers of African descent who choose to relocate to their country of origin after their footballing career must have elapsed is more than enough to be made for life even with so much extravagance. |
Freshtruth:FC Porto over Man City? Portugal over England? Wonders shall never end! Please if this is a joke, please stop it. ![]() |
THEDEEPSIGHT:The presidency is the highest position of all elected positions in most countries. Whether you agree with his policies or not matters little. Investigating and probing a president whether sitting, incumbent, ex, or whatever must be done with utmost care, diligence and awe and should be avoided as much as possible. It is not a trite position where you pull the trigger for slight or minor provocations especially for cases where re-election is a possibility. So civil servants who witch-hunt a sitting president because of a televised speech he made after an election is okay? Is that really something to investigate a president for? Are you fucking serious? If our of our own arms, the EfCC, had done something similar to Peter Obi because he alleged widespread rigging, thumb-printing and what-have-you, imploring his supporters to troop out en mass and resist the handing over, would that be a just course for the EFCC to probe him? Should you even do it in good faith? Or maybe Jonathan! |
blowjohn:People think we forget things very quickly, but our scroll of remembrance is firmly by our side. Five or ten years down the line, we still remember stuff like it was yesterday. The president isn't going to remind us or these witch-hunters of how much hate they exude, of how they tarnished his image, and of how they made him feel at that time, but we still remember these things. We know how he felt because we felt the same. It is just and perfectly fitting that those who were embroiled in these stuff be fired and relieve of their duties with immediate effect. The injury in this case is clearly the case of a just punishment. Hahahaha! A big lesson to many that government officials must never entangle themselves in political witch-hunt because power belongs neither to them nor even to the officials they witch-hunt. It belongs to GOD FIRE ALL OF THEM! |
adioolayi: DropsMic: Babangidapikin: OT2024:Two wrongs always make a right. Ah, two wrongs always make a very good, dead right. Hehehe! You witch-hunt me at my lowest ebbs when I am a extremely powerless and vulnerable; I witch-hunt you and get my pound of flesh when you, too, are facing similar fate. I guess we are both right, but let no one come up with any patronizing nonsense that Trump's vindictiveness is not justified. It absolutely is. He is fucking right in these vindictive firings and sackings and I am brutally sure that God, his God, is with him. Hehe! |
Namaster:I cannot disagree with you. Why would I? Ha! Mogbe! See me oo! Seee, I am asking the attendants besides me to fill your pantry with a thousand bottles of chilled, teeth-disjointing, spine-relaxing Maltina. ![]() |
If I were Donald John Trump, I would spit, not on this man's miserable face, but on his wretched soul. And on others, too! I would dismember and disfigure the bastard and others and then desecrate their graves - pouring shit and filth all over, severing members and organs beyond recognition; yes, to cadavers; sprinkling rubbish and filth all over. Shit everywhere. A landscape, a graveyard full of shit and filth and mess! As if that is not enough, I would take these pitiful cadaver, the bodies, into the wilderness of the nations; there, I would judge all of them face to face. Olo.ribu's! Olor.iburuku somebodies! God damn Mark Zuckerberg, Meta, and all her employees, all of them, no exceptions, a quadrillion times before he finally damns them. Una for kukuma pay Donald Trump twice as much of what the US government budgets annually for running the country na. ![]() |
Ibrahimado: ![]() No, it's more like tennis-styled seeding. Nothing weird about this. ![]() |
Ibrahimado:Edit: Duplicated comment! |
AlabiKILLER2023:Please share screenshot (of the winning) for the sake of those who do not follow him or who are not on Twitter. |
Joeblaze26: ![]() |
AlabiKILLER2023:That's at least 1200+ odds on a 50k stake? Hahaha, peak degenerate gambling. But wait fes, how I go pam plenty games on top 50k stake say I dey find 111million? Omo, this one na confirm Olympus of degeneracy. How very degenerate can you get? If I met Mr Banks in person, I would threaten to report him to his mother. Seems the world is a football field; you, I, and other gamblers in the wild are the players and Mr Banks is our goalkeeper! Ah an! 111m? Please share screenshot for the sake of those who do not follow him or who are not on Twitter. ![]() |
Kafirbigot:Where in Ilorin? |
