₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,330,990 members, 8,448,118 topics. Date: Sunday, 19 July 2026 at 07:13 PM

Toggle theme

Baldwretch's Posts

Nairaland ForumBaldwretch's ProfileBaldwretch's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 25 pages)

Christianity EtcRe: If A Spirit Impersonates Angel Gabriel, How Would Muhammad Tell The Difference? by Baldwretch(op): 8:26pm On Feb 21, 2025
Ohyoudidnt:
No deflection. It is just showing you that indeed some things changed over time. Judaism didn't change perhaps because Jews reject Jesus as a messiah and prophet.
Clearly, you do not have a defense. You are still on - Well, Islam is right because even Christianity does not observe Kosher. grin grin grin

You know I asked you a question earlier: How many people have to believe the wrong stuff for it to become true? grin grin grin grin

If all Christians believe an untruth (of God's law), does it make it true for Muslims?

Clap for yourself. grin grin grin grin grin.

Besides, the reasons Christians do not observe Kosher is different, radically different from the Islamic perspectives; just like the reason the pig is unclean for both faiths. If, on the Day of Judgment, God asks the Christian why he eats pork and doesn't observe Kosher, his defense would be quite different from the Muslim's. Well, the Christians eat pork that's why we also eat it is very inexcusable.


I just put you in a corner where you either have to assume the most debased, fickle, inconstant, depraved character of Godthe Almighty or of Muhammad, and you have refused to take sides. grin grin grin grin shocked shocked

THANK GOD FOR YOUR GOOD SENSES! YOUR HEAD CORRECT!
Christianity EtcRe: If A Spirit Impersonates Angel Gabriel, How Would Muhammad Tell The Difference? by Baldwretch(op): 9:11pm On Feb 20, 2025
Ohyoudidnt:
It is interesting you take this stand point but ignore your own books.

Acts 10:
13 Then a voice told him, “Get up, Peter. Kill and eat.”

14 “Surely not, Lord!” Peter replied. “I have never eaten anything impure or unclean.”

15 The voice spoke to him a second time, “Do not call anything impure that God has made clean.

And also Mark 7:
18 Are you so dull? he asked. “Don’t you see that nothing that enters a person from the outside can defile them?

19 For it doesn’t go into their heart but into their stomach, and then out of the body.” (In saying this, Jesus declared all foods clean.).
.
Perhaps you can explain a little more the position of these verses as to if it takes precedence over Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14.
Did I tell you I am a Christian? Even if I am a Christian, I am not arguing from a traditional Christian position. Pretend you are talking to an orthodox Jew.

Appeal to what you believe. Christianity says that is the case does not make it so.

Christianity's truths are not Islamic truths. Appeal to what you believe.


Edit: [/b]Well, I would defend your counters from a traditional Christian position, but not yet. grin grin grin grin grin

We must stop this act of deflecting arguments. Counter. Just counter me, don't say well your own religion says the same thing. [b]We can all be wrong
Christianity EtcRe: If A Spirit Impersonates Angel Gabriel, How Would Muhammad Tell The Difference? by Baldwretch(op): 2:15pm On Feb 20, 2025
Ohyoudidnt:
I should have gone with my initial conviction to reply to you first but felt it better to slow down to holistically reply to you.

I have seen your previous post which you nicely included here but fail to identify the laws countered. Could I implore you to specifically state these?




Could you clarify how the laws of Moses were contradicted in prophethood of Muhammad ; peace be on both of them.
I am currently low on data. I wouldn't be able to pull up Quranic verses on websites for fear of running out of data completely. grin grin grin. This new data hike, my eyes have seen wien.

That being said, this is the first order to the world of mankind:

Baldwretch:
:

Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14:

9 “Of all the marine animals, these are ones you may use for food. You may eat anything from the water if it has both fins and scales, whether taken from salt water or from streams. 10 But you must never eat animals from the sea or from rivers that do not have both fins and scales. They are detestable to you. This applies both to little creatures that live in shallow water and to all creatures that live in deep water. 11 They will always be detestable to you. You must never eat their meat or even touch their dead bodies. 12 Any marine animal that does not have both fins and scales is detestable to you.

46 “These are the instructions regarding land animals, birds, marine creatures, and animals that scurry along the ground. 47 By these instructions you will know what is unclean and clean, and which animals may be eaten and which may not be eaten.”
Meanwhile, the spirit that inspire Muhammad inspired him to say this:

AntiChristian:
:

Allah says (interpretation of the meaning): “Lawful to you is (the pursuit of) water-game and its use for food – for the benefit of yourselves and those who travel…” [al-Maidah 5:96]. So with this all animals that live only in the sea are permissible to eat.
You cannot defend this. Doing so would be like trying to have your cake, eating everything at once, and then putting it in the refrigerator for show at a later time. Oga, your cake is in your stomach, not in your refrigerator. shocked shocked shocked shocked shocked

In the first command and just like reptiles and animals that walk on all four, sea creatures, most of them, are forbidden including the crab, periwinkles, Oysters of all kinds, the sea-snakes (lol), Molluscs of all kinds, etc, etc. In fact, this command is rigid only certain kinds of fishes can be eaten. God is covertly saying that only certain kind of fishes, of all sea creatures that live in the water, can be eaten.

Muhammad is saying quite the opposite. Both cannot be true. He could NOT have been inspired by the real Gabriel to contradict what has been made clear. An impostor spirit does not need to (or have to) contradict every command that was given. One command, just one, is more than enough to expose him. This command is more than a sad commentary of what Moses thinks of sea animals. It is a command from God himself. Read the very first verse of that chapter.

Another one:

God says of the camel in that same chapter. Verse 4.

Baldwretch:
:

You may not, however, eat the following animals that have split hooves or that chew the cud, but not both. The camel chews the cud but does not have split hooves , so it is ceremonially unclean for you.
In the Quran Muhammad repeatedly (in several Surahs) talks of the camel as pack animals to cherish, to eat in a sacred place, and to handle lightly. The God who instructed us not to eat this animal (with clearly stated reasons) could not have inspired his angel to contradict his earlier position. That is thinking the unthinkable. Perish the thought! grin grin grin grin grin

And like I said, an impostor spirit does not have to contradict every law that God had given. One contradiction is enough. I would not be able to pull up Quranic verses on websites which might be data-zapping due to data constraints to prove Muhammad's approval of the camel, but they are right there on Google. Google it.

And then we have the subject of men re-marrying the women they have once divorced even if these women had married someone else after the first husband divorced them. The Bible says no, don't do it. It is detestable before God, but the Quran permits it.

Let me quote two verses of the bible that forbids it:

Jeremiah three verse one. Also, Deuteronomy 24. Verse 3. I have omitted verse one and two.

Deu. 24 vs. 3.

Baldwretch:
:

But if the second husband also turns against her and divorces her, or if he dies, the first husband may not marry her again, for she has been defiled. That would be detestable to the LORD. You must not being guilt upon the land the Lord your God is giving you as a special possession.
The book of Jeremiah chapter three and verse one reiterates this sentiment differently.

In the Quran, Muhammad cheers you on, saying yes you can re-marry her even if another man had married her.

These are not abstract laws like in the field of Mathematics where the questioner is asking you to prove Minkowsky's inequality or Pythagoras theorem. These laws were made to tackle real-life situations that humans often find themselves enmeshed in. Two contradictory laws cannot be both true.

Clearly, if God would send angels, the angel would say what the Lord his God has instructed him to say and nothing more. God would not send an angel to counter what he sent an earlier angel to say. NO! God would never screw his government in the most debased of ways. He always upholds his laws, being the foundation of his government.

I have not bothered to read the Quran but I am quite sure that if I did, I would find many more worms and filth that indicate an impostor spirit.
Christianity EtcRe: If A Spirit Impersonates Angel Gabriel, How Would Muhammad Tell The Difference? by Baldwretch(op): 7:38am On Feb 19, 2025
Ohyoudidnt:
Indeed I understand you somewhat better now however no matter how pretentious an impostor is the true nature eventually reveals.

Perhaps previous 'good' actions were to lure you in and gain your trust then the true 'bad' nature reveals when you're too far gone to think otherwise.

[b]So tell which bad actions did the alleged impostor angel perform. I am sure you have quite a number to share. The scene is yours now. [/b]Give us a show!
Okay, good. We are getting there. We might be on the same page soon.

An impostor spirit (or prophet) would eventually reveal himself, yes. You are very right.

He did eventually reveal his true self not just by different accounts of historical account. That can be taken.

He did reveal himself by the laws he countered. Sorry, by the laws he gave. Clearly, proving his lack of authority.

I started a thread

https://www.nairaland.com/8313525/gods-orders-counter-order-proves-muhammmad

Proving that he is who he is - an impostor. I would encourage you to read it. We started off the discussion with one law - the sea creature.

And then I capped it off with another, the camel. I rounded off the post with this biting comment:

Baldwretch:
A man who lived with, used, ate, and especially touched what the Torah calls an unclean animal thereby making himself unclean by this act wants to instruct us on what is clean? Is this not an irony!"
In the thread I am directing you to, I summarized my post in twelve lines. Let me share it here.


Baldwretch:
1. God gave commandments, instructions, regulations to the tribe of Israel through his prophet Moses.

2. These instructions or commands can also be likened to an order and should be seen as such. All God's commands are actually divine orders. And since we are expressly instructed not to add to or subtract from them, it can well be inferred that all divine orders are orders of perpetual injunction that cannot be modified or broken. We are required to just obey them, not modify or tinker with them.

3. An order implies a prohibition by default. That is what is implied. An order should be prohibitive by its very nature. Yes, orders can also be instructive - saying what you should do. But we don't nitpick a prohibitive order since it is what it is by default. I am not even started about corruption of these divine orders or what have you. I am not even talking about that yet. I am just talking about the nature of orders. "They said we should" can be nitpicked, but "they said we should not" cannot be nitpicked since even honest men agree that we need to be gag quite often . Only contentious people do. It's just like Pascal's Wager where he argues thus: "if God exist, you gain everything and if he doesn't exist, then you lose nothing. Wager then that he exist."

4. Like every sphere of rationale and sentient existence, governance requires a chain of authority. Usually, the highest chain of authority (or perceived to be) is the authority that is first in line (not always the case, though) or the authority that God chooses. I would even argue that the authority that God Almighty chooses is usually the first in line for central succession, for how else would we know and identify God's scale of preference among other authorities prophesying in his name at the same time?

We don't start a relay race with a weak athlete. God agrees and confirms this truth to be the case because this authority (I am talking about) is privileged to receive these instructions at the highest and most loftiest level of prophecy - face-to-face as a man talks to a friend, or between the whirling Cherubims in the Holy Of Holies cheesy grin grin grin, or from the pillar of Cloud and Fire, or through a theophany, or through an Angel (which happens rarely). It was the highest a man could ever get with God. Nothing can be loftier, nothing can be higher, and nothing can be better. God himself proves his authority with instant judgment when naysayers disagreed with this authority.

5. These instruction was given to the Israelite, a Semitic tribe, which God would use to pull mankind to himself either through acts of warfare or through some other means. The Torah as a body of instruction is not meant for ancient Israel alone, but for all of mankind. The Torah, in several isolated passages, makes it very clear that foreigners are subject to the same decrees, instructions, and commands as the natives are and even makes provisions for (certain non-Jewish race) admittance into the temple.

6. In time, other authorities appeared, gave their prophecies as revealed by God, and then they disappeared. These authorities who came in quick succession have the same objectives - namely, to establish the divine government. I was supposed to call them prophets, but since prophets carry divine authority, no expatiation is needed.

Then comes a "righteous" man who claims to have had a revelation from the same God that appeared to the first authority - Moses. This authority would be renowned for starting off the groundwork for belief in the most "mischievous" of claims; namely, that one authority needs to confirm another authority or that one authority needs to confirm the messages given to another authority by the same God. Also, this authority, as the last authority of his unsubstantiated claim, would cleverly bar his own revelation from thorough "spiritual" scrutiny (not physical examination) since other authorities after him have not been sent. grin grin grin grin

6. Human government is a terrible mimicry of divine government. There is often wranglings, disagreements, discontents, jostling for power, hijacking for royal successions and more, but that is not so with divine government. Divine government with God on the throne is the most perfect there could ever be of any kind of government. All the delegated authorities agree with each other; respect each other, have the same message regardless of their location or where they live, do not pry into the little details of the contents given to one of them.

No authority re-tells or re-echoes what messages or contents that God the Almighty has revealed to other authorities before him. I didn't have to mention that, but that is actually the case. God glorifies himself immensely and shows the depth of his justice, his power, and especially his love for each of his authorities by hiding from each of the authorities what was disclosed to any of them. We see this at play over and over again. Divine government with the Devil on the throne, even though not as perfect, still show that human government need to be propped with a very long rope. Our government still pales in comparison and far more so. A study of divine government with the Devil on the throne should (or might) educate us on how perfect government is supposed to be run.

7. Also, a study of all the prophets before the authority being referred to is supposed to enlighten us on how perfect government is run.

8. The said authority usurps the role of the first authority, claiming to be a co-central authority and talks about making a couple of instructions "lawful" and "permitted/permissible"- of course, in writing and in deed as the case may be.

9. The said authority claims he has been sent to confirm all the revelations before him and then contradicts the first authority.

10. The contradiction is not a case of textual corruption.

11. Regardless of human locale, environment, or settings, God does not contradict or modify his laws which are the foundation of his government. Even the Devil doesn't. tongue tongue God would not go back on his words which he made to one of his servants when he calls another. That is everything God is not. And even if he does go back on his words, the first of his flock would be the unlikeliest to fall victim because he would not undermine his authority.

12. The said authority cannot be trusted to be an oracle of the Most High, and the problem is not with God, but with the messenger.

The conclusion is therefore necessary and obvious: He is not a prophet sent by God. He is a prophet of his own imagination; he concocted everything.
Please go through that thread or only the comments I made in the thread. There is just so much for you to ponder and think over if you are sincere. Clearly, an angel who inspires a law that contradicts laid down instruction for all of mankind given even before we have the Lawgiver, Moses, is an impostor spirit. grin grin grin grin grin
Christianity EtcRe: If A Spirit Impersonates Angel Gabriel, How Would Muhammad Tell The Difference? by Baldwretch(op): 5:38am On Feb 19, 2025
Ohyoudidnt:
The initial revelation in the Cave of Hira marks a monumental event, demonstrating the profound nature of divine selection. When the Prophet Muhammad pbuh encountered the angel Jibril, the command to "recite" was both a challenge and an invitation to engage with the divine message. The Prophet's initial hesitation, stemming from his unlettered state, highlights the humility inherent in spiritual receptiveness.

The physical manifestation of Jibril a. s encompassing the horizon with his six hundred wings, reinforces the magnitude of this revelation. Such an overwhelming sight instills a sense of awe and certainty in the Prophet about the authenticity of his experience. This was further validated by Waraqah ibn Nawfal, whose recognition of Jibril's role confirms the continuity of divine communication through angels across prophets.

Continued revelations through Jibril cemented this relationship, indicating that the Prophet pbuh was not merely a passive recipient but an active participant in the dissemination of divine wisdom. The Quran explicitly acknowledges Jibril’s pivotal role, affirming him as the "Trustworthy Spirit." Thus, the narrative of Jibril embodies the assurance of divine guidance in a world rife with uncertainty, compelling both believers and skeptics alike to acknowledge his significance as the messenger of Allah.
Ex-kiss me sir! Ex-kiss me sir! You have not said anything. Ex-kiss me sir! Ex-kiss me sir! All you did is assume and then proceed to talk in detail about what you have just assumed. WOW! How convenient? Oh no, not very convenient!

I wish I could explain this stuff to you like a man explains basic arithmetic to a five-year-old.

He was inspired in the Cave of Hira which had caves insides caves inside caves - ten thousand caves embedded in total, I agree!

He was asked to recite the Quran when he had no mouth, I agree. It's true.

He met the holy one, the great Jubril, a fearsome and terrible angel with ten million wings, it's true. Muhammad saw him and I can relate! grin grin grin grin

These claims and many more are not up for dispute. I agree with these claims and more. You are right. I do not argue these with you. After all, it's not as if we are talking of natural events here.

What I am arguing is that this so-called angel that appeared to him might be an impostor. I mean, an angel from the devil or from other sources claiming to be an angel from God. And since he is claiming to be who he is not, the so-called angel would have to be very consistent (in words and in deed) with the persona which he claims to represent - an angel from God. An angel who claims to be Jubril in words, but who is not, would try as much as he can to be the angel Jubril in deeds. That is speaking definitionally.

Then, I proceeded to posit that we cannot know (and neither can Muhammad) if this fearsome angel is from God or from the devil just by the staggering powers he exercises on Muhammad, or by the rules and laws he enacts from his Lord or by... and more. We cannot know things that are beyond us. We can, however, identify sources by the authority they possess. Unfortunately, the angel that appeared to him couldn't prove the authority they posses.

For instance, an angel who has authority over the waters would exercise his overreaching power over the waters in a way that angels who do not have authority over the waters do not and could not. All Godly angels whether the lower or higher ranked ones have been commuted some authority that evil angels do not enjoy. One of such is the ability to be made manifest in the physical plain to humans. Unfortunately, the angel that appeared to Muhammad could not demonstrate this authority. That is what evil angels can not do.

Since the angel revealed himself to Muhammad and to only him, he is definitely not from God.

This is actually one of the ways God restrains them otherwise they would screw his government since their appearance would justify man's proclivity to unbelief. If you saw the devil in his glory today and you tow his path worshiping and praying to him, wouldn't that warrant what could be called - justified unbelief, or do you think that it's a coincidence that animals cannot talk?

His eloquent words, sharp rebuke, threats of Hell, his immense glorification of God, his detailed code of conduct for the believers and many more are not definitive proofs that God sent him. These, in and of themselves, are not definitive proofs of the angel's authority.

That being said, It seems false prophets have a knack for usurping authority and claiming to be a co-central authority by contradicting what has been made plain and prescribing their own laws. The devil can replicate the exact same command that God gave to Moses word for word if he is going to be the authority on the subject.

Do you get the objection now?

The fact of a matter should be established by more than one witness. He cannot be the only witness to a divergent path that God has prepared for his people. If Muhammad (and us) would tow a radical path that has not been towed before, then this calls for a greater witness. Extraordinary demands calls for extraordinary evidence.
Christianity EtcRe: If A Spirit Impersonates Angel Gabriel, How Would Muhammad Tell The Difference? by Baldwretch(op): 11:55am On Feb 18, 2025
Ohyoudidnt:
Quran 5:8:
O believers! Stand firm for Allah and bear true testimony. Do not let the hatred of a people lead you to injustice. Be just! That is closer to righteousness. And be mindful of Allah. Surely Allah is All-Aware of what you do.

Interesting you turn your bald retching to questioning if Angel Gabriel;Jibril a. s, who brought the Quran to Muhammad pbuh being an impostor. How would you rather authenticate his identity?

Have you yourself actually ever seen an angel?
I am not actually questioning how Muhammad figured the angel's identity as Gabriel; I am asking how he could tell that the angel who appeared to him is from God and not from other sources. These are two different, but inter-related questions.

Granted, an angel appeared to him; granted, the angel identified his name as Gabriel; granted, there was a metaphysical influence around the events that indicates that the experience is more than natural, but how do we know that this angel and the experience he had is of God and not from the Devil, or from other sources? An impostor spirit claiming to emanate from and speak for the one true God with a terribly strong metaphysical influence is possible.

That is the state of the question.

Let me use an example. When the angel of God appeared to Moses in the Burning Bush; the bush was burning but was never burning up. Moses was like - wow, what in the world is going on here. How can a bush be burning for this long and not get burnt up, so he goes over and takes a very good look. Turns out, it is of God.

Ah w,ait a seconds, did I just say that it is of God? Well, hold on for a minute. It might not be. Suppose someone who wasn't there when the events happened or suppose some who witnessed the event turn around and claims that the bush did in fact burn and never got burnt up as alleged. Suppose the person's conclusions on the events is polar opposite to Moses' conclusions that the metaphysical influence on Moses and all the circumstances surrounding the events are from the Devil, not from God. It happened yes, but it is just not from God.

Would it be a reasonable and credible arguments he's making? Yes, it would be.

But why? To some degrees, the Devil is also able to replicate the same. So how could we convince this doubting Thomas that the events and the metaphysical influence and all that as experienced by Moses the servant of God is from God and not from the Devil?

That is the state of the question.

You see the thing is, no matter how much evil spirits like to wander and disrupt the divine government, they are still under God's authority and have been restrained from doing certain things. I would like to think that it is not just that they have been restrained, but they are incapable, by virtue of God's overreaching power, of doing certain things they would naturally want to do.

Do evil spirits exist? YES! But if an evil spirit wants to appear to maybe thousands or millions today as God did before the sight of all the Israelite, would he be able to accomplish or replicate the same? NO! Why not? He doesn't have that authority. God is still on the throne and he very much restrains them.

If Muhammad claims that an angel from God appeared to him with strong metaphysical influence; he might be right and he might be wrong, we would need more than his claims to believe. This spirit would have to convince not just him but us by the authority he spirit possess. The spirit would have to prove the authority he possess by appearing, in part, to some of us (or to some of the people who lived in Arabia during the time of Muhammad).

If the devil or his angels wanted to appear to all of us or to all Nigerians today, they couldn't. They do not have such authority!

Only God with the ultimate authority over everyone including the devil is able to do that. God is also able to commute some of those powers to his angels. The devil is absolutely unable to. He has been stripped of this power. No evil spirit or spirit from other sources posses that authority. grin grin grin grin grin grin

You see where I am going: only Muhammad saw the angel Gabriel. Only Muhammad came under his metaphysical influence. Only Muhammad! It's only Muhammad! grin grin grin grin

If that doubting Thomas doubted the theophany, the Burning Bush that I mentioned earlier, Moses could just say, okay your skepticism is justified. Wait. Just be patient. Don't worry. You would see the glory of God with your own two korokoro eyes and then you'd believe.

In the book of Surah Al-Torah chapter 1 verse 1 and chapter 25, 72, and 1000 of the holy Quran of that Surah, in my own translation, the New Living Translation of the holy Quran, it says: grin grin grin tongue tongue tongue tongue grin grin grin grin

And the glory of the Lord appeared to all the Israelite as they grumbled in their tents.

In another Surah, Surah Al-Exodus, grin grin grin grin tongue tongue tongue tongue it says,

To the Israelite at the bottom of the mountain, the glory of the Lord appear like glittering fire while the summit appears like gleaming amber.

There are just so many Surahs grin grin grin that says that God proved himself or his angels for other people to witness in the physical plain besides Moses indicating his absolute authority. That is how we differentiate the good from the bad, the righteous from the unrighteous, by the authority they possess. Not necessarily by the powers they exercise because (in that department) we do not have the ability to conclusively tell the difference. I wish I could meet you in person and talk sense into our head. Maybe, just maybe, if you are sincere you would renounce Islam and do a deeper introspection.

Ohyoudidnt:
The Qur'an serves not just as a religious scripture but also as a deep well of moral guidance for its adherents. Its teachings emphasize key virtues such as justice, honesty, compassion, humility, patience, gratitude, forgiveness, charity, modesty, and the importance of refraining from slander, all of which play a crucial role in shaping the personal and social behavior of a believer.
Unfortunately, all of these attributes you mentioned do not indicate conclusively that God is the source. Contrary to what many think, the devil is not terribly bad who wants nothing but bloodshed, murder, thievery, slander, and all sorts of vices, unhinged and unabated. He could make demands of these and even more from those who might believe in him for different reasons than God's, for different purposes, to different ends, and if he would be the authority on the subject. It all boil down to authority wars. Doing what you think is right because "He said so" is far more important than doing the "right thing." If a man would come under metaphysical influence that is not of God, all of these demands and more would be demanded, with absolute strictness in the details, provided it is done because of him. The idea of a depraved, degenerate deity that commands and allows all sorts of vices and crimes have never been a human idea. It only exist in the imagination. kiss kiss tongue tongue tongue tongue tongue
Christianity EtcRe: If A Spirit Impersonates Angel Gabriel, How Would Muhammad Tell The Difference? by Baldwretch(op): 9:16pm On Feb 17, 2025
harqinhola:
@OP, I understand what you are trying to do but I hope I am able to convince you to desist from this line of thought after reading my comment. This is going to be a long one, so get a chair .

1. Theological Evidence (Qur’an & Hadith)

The Qur’an explicitly states that the revelations Muhammad (PBUH) received were from God via Angel Gabriel not a lying spirit

Surah Al-Baqarah 2:97:

“Say, ‘Whoever is an enemy to Gabriel, it is he who has brought the Qur’an down upon your heart, O Muhammad, by permission of Allah, confirming that which was before it and as guidance and good tidings for the believers.’

The Qur’an consistently affirms its divine origin:
Surah Al-Najm 53:3-4: “Nor does he (Muhammad) speak from his own inclination. It is not but a revelation revealed.”

If the revelation had come from a lying spirit (Satan), the Qur’an would not have repeatedly condemned falsehood and deception. In fact, Surah Al-Haqqah 69:44-47 states that if Muhammad (PBUH) had fabricated anything about God, he would have been punished immediately.

2. Muhammad’s (PBUH) Character and Integrity

Before receiving revelation, Muhammad (PBUH) was known as Al-Amin (the Trustworthy) by his people. A person known for honesty and integrity would not suddenly fabricate divine claims.

Even his enemies admitted that he never lied. Abu Sufyan, a leader of the Quraysh who opposed Islam, was questioned by the Roman Emperor Heraclius about Muhammad’s honesty and admitted that Muhammad never lied.

3. The Message’s Consistency and Ethical Standards

The Qur’an’s teachings are deeply moral, advocating justice, kindness, and truthfulness. If a lying spirit inspired it, why would it command worship of the one true God and prohibit falsehood?

Unlike deceitful spirits that promote corruption and chaos, the Qur’an guides humanity towards righteousness, which aligns with divine revelation rather than deception.

4. The Transformative Impact of the Revelation

The Qur’an revolutionized Arabian society, abolishing practices like female infanticide, tribal vengeance, and economic exploitation. Falsehood does not produce a civilization based on justice, compassion, and learning.

The rapid spread of Islam and its lasting influence show the power of truth, as deceit does not lead to long-term positive change.

5. Biblical Precedents: Angel Gabriel’s Role in Revelation

Angel Gabriel (Jibreel) is a well-known messenger of God in the Bible, appearing to Mary (Luke 1:26-38) and Daniel (Daniel 9:21-23). If Gabriel was truly sent by God before, why would his role be questioned in Islam?

Conclusion

All the evidence scriptural, historical, moral, and logical supports that Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) received revelation from God through Angel Gabriel, not a lying spirit. His character, the Qur’an’s teachings, and the transformative impact of his message affirm its divine origin.
Sorry, for some reasons beyond me, my response took longer than normal because I have been offline since I last made this post. Apologies! Give it to me woto-woto!

A liar repeatedly reminds his listeners that what he is saying is the truth. Try to cross-examine a cheat and a liar and you would sooner find out that he's repeatedly reinforcing the false idea that all the facts on ground as presented by himself is true. It's all smoke and mirrors. It happens all the time. Unfortunately, that is not very much different from what we have here.

You start off your argument based on what the Quran says about itself. Have you ever met a vendor who would honestly admit that his wares is very terrible, and below quality? Not very many! Most men think others are bad and vile, but themselves. Why should Muhammad be any different?

How very convenient to use the Quran to prove that it is God who inspired Muhammad to write it! How very convenient to use the words of Muhammad to prove that it is God who possessed him in the writing of it! I have to ask you again though, is that how you argue to the truth of this question I asked? Namely, that the spirit that possessed Muhammad is of God and not from other sources?

You are not appealing to the truth; your appeal is more to the claims the Quran makes about itself which is independent of the truth. Experience should teach you that claims are not necessarily true and even your claims are very unfalsifiable. Very, very circular argument.

You state a premise. Draw an argument that is independent of the premise and then use the premise to prove that your argument is true. Which kind thing be this na!


Could we verify that a particular angel is of God or is of the Devil by the metaphysical powers or influence surrounding how they were revealed to us? NO! If the devil sent his entourage, a company of angels, he would also exercise a mighty metaphysical grip upon you that is just enough to make you believe whatever.

Could we know whether the angel before us is of God or is of the devil by the great powers that enabled us to identify them? NO! Metaphysical influence can be terribly strong and not find its source in God. Just because you find yourself grappling under great powers does not mean it is necessarily of God. The Devil has great powers too. When God performed mighty miracles before Pharaoh shortly before he was destroyed, Pharaoh's magicians did the same. Could you identify God's snake or the Devil's snake as they lay on the floor? NO! Are both of divine origin? YES! Is it easy to mistake one for the other? Yes. Why? They both exercise metaphysical influence. I could go on and on with countless examples.

The Quran's teaching are not deeply moral. They are not. They are at variance with the bible. They tend to contradict what moral codes has been laid down for God's worshipers as it pertains to our obligations to God. And besides, morality is worthless if God is not the source of the morality. Two folks might agree on certain etiquette for different reasons. It is a common phenomenon. For instance, the Quran seems to agree with the Torah on one ceremonially unclean animal, the pig. Both scriptures agree, but for different reasons. It seems to me that the Quran forbids the pig due to its perceived uncleanliness (the pig, you know what I mean) whereas the Bible forbids it for an entirely different reasons - not chewing the cud.

Here, you can see that both scripture agree but they do not really agree.

What is preventing men from wife-sharing if the Quran says - yes, a man can re-marry his divorced wife even if she had remarried whereas the bible forbids it. It seems to me that the justice, kindness, and ethical standards you are talking about is all in your head. This is chaos-violence pro-max. I created a thread on God's order and counter order using two creatures - the sea creatures and the camel. No Muslim has been able to refute me. Maybe you can do that in the thread here since you think God is a deity who contradicts himself.

The Quran would definitely command worship of a monotheistic, sovereign God because the human psyche naturally frowns at the idea of multiple gods or the idea of the gods having a son. Our psyche frowns at that. We cherish the idea of a powerful, all-wise, omniscient deity. This cringey attitude from the Quran is very much expected just as it cringes at the consumption of pork (pig meat). That doesn't make it true, though. The truth is independent of what we think. It's just like sports lovers who would tell you that the losing team, Team Y, would not want to lose the return leg of a football match because they lost the first leg. However, what they want is irrelevant and doesn't conclusively determine the outcome of the game. Even if the Quran forbids falsehood, it is for different reason than the God of the bible.The Quran might forbid falsehood because it creates a rippling disturbance in the community; meanwhile, the Jewish God would do same for different reasons.

Spreading of Islam, you say. Lol. How many people have to believe a lie for it to become true? One hundred, or maybe one thousand, a million, a trillion? It doesn't matter that many people believe it or spread its claims. All of them can still be guilty of spreading the wrong religion. Appealing to popularity is not so wise.

Sorry, I could not quote your write-up piece by piece because I am running out of time.
Christianity EtcIf A Spirit Impersonates Angel Gabriel, How Would Muhammad Tell The Difference? by Baldwretch(op): 8:59pm On Feb 15, 2025
This is a very serious question and should not be taken with levity whatsoever because everything in Islam rises and falls with this claim.

Let me reiterate the question once more to my beautiful Muslim readers here: If a lying, top-ranked spirit impersonates the angel Gabriel (Jubril) claiming that he is, in fact, angel Gabriel, the holy one sent from God, how would Muhammad tell the difference? Or what if the spirit that communicated with Muhammad had been sent by the devil to disrupt God's earthly government and is claiming to be God's, how would you know? Or what if the spirit is, in fact, sent (from God) as a lying spirit for other purposes?

If a man I had never seen before claims he is Donald Trump, how would I tell he is telling the truth or he is lying? Well, that would be easy peasy since I have seen Donald Trump's images and portraits on many occasions, but spirits might be virtually indistinguishable to humans, not just because we do not have senses that correctly identify them (maybe by their name as the case may be) independent of what the spirit says or claims he is, but for many reasons beyond us.

If a man comes forward on this thread claiming that he is Joshua Bidemi; well, how would I know that he is telling me the truth or he is lying irrespective of what his username or his previous comments says? Well, the truth is, I would not know. I would have to be under some "powers" sort of to correctly identify factual claims of this sorts. Maybe the more important question then is, how do we know that Muhammad isn't under some demonic influence to tell apart a factual information that cannot be known by the senses? If God or the devil did, in fact, possessed him to identify this angel, how would he or even us know who's doing the possession? even in this day and age, people get demon possessed a lot, quite a lot. What if he was demon possessed to correctly or incorrectly identify the angel?

A claim of revelation from a specific angel is a very, very, very tall claim.

If angel Gabriel does, in fact, appear to me right now as I type this, and says he is angel Gabriel, how would I know? To be quite frank, I would not know and neither would you. I would have to take him at his words, accepting in blind faith whatever he says about himself because there is no way to scrutinize or examine a metaphysical being or examine the claims they make. If he is lying I wouldn't know. If he is telling the truth, I wouldn't know. I would just have to believe whatever he says.

Believing whatever he says is not as important as who he is, in fact. We have to be cleared on who he is first before believing whatever he says since impersonation is quite a real possibility.

I would appreciate responses.

You see, a claim of revelation from a prophet is not enough because even the devil could reveal himself to whom he wants to deceive as is evident from demon possessed humans who do evil stuff at the behest of the devil.

Some throw themselves into the fire, into water; some eat sand, eat poo, and do other unthinkable things at the devil's command or under his influence. How can it be said that the spirit that possessed Muhammad is not one of them?
PoliticsRe: Anambra Govt Seals Okija Shrine by Baldwretch: 9:11pm On Feb 12, 2025
PheelzAlmighty:
Finally grin

But I really don't see how this improves governance in the state or boosts its economyhuh
Anambrarians are hopelessly fetish and trust me, this can't stop the average man from indulging.
Dey play! Dey play, you hear.

Africa is the terrible shit-hole it is, a very shitty place, a pitiful dumping-ground for many unclean sepulchers; a vile hunting ground for every unclean vulture, and this is because right from time, Africa is the haven for witchcraft and sorcery where every unclean bird seeks to get followers.

No nation whose citizens practice practice divination, cast spell, interpret omens, call forth the spirit of the dead, worship evil spirits, have their altars, or even inquire of them, ever succeeds. NONE!

This might be the only good thing in his record as the governor of Anambra state.
CareerRe: My January Salary Withheld by Baldwretch: 8:58pm On Feb 11, 2025
donleo92:
Most times is better to get an employment letter. Stating salaries, rules and other stuffs before starting a job.

God knows I can't imagine myself working for such
Could you work as a Sales boy or a Sales rep if the pay is right?
CareerRe: Nigerian Employers And Their Slavery Mentality by Baldwretch: 8:30pm On Feb 11, 2025
AllBlack:
They laid me off with immediate effect instead of following the rules by giving me one month notice or the appropriate layoff payment.
I didn't threaten them, I just went straight to my lawyer, next thing na court we enter.

They will cover their loopholes and turn you to a joke. Weigh your options, be sure of yourself and sue if you want to. good luck.
Eerily similar to what played out between myself and ex-employer, but I was the one who terminated the contract not them.

They would, for instance, send notifications on Whatsapp (not on Whatsapp) and then proceed to penalize me for missing shared information. At one point they deducted 5k from my salary because of two days' Resumption Workshop absence. I was increasingly dissatisfied with how they treated me, so I stalled until the holiday.

Sent a para resignation on the very day they paid the previous month salary on discovering that another 5k or so was gone. The offer letter makes clear that either party may terminate or forfeit a month salary in lieu. I terminated. Gave a month notice. They replaced me immediately, but refused to pay that months' salary (which was a holiday) and could not have cared less. Holiday breaks are fully paid for, but they did not pay me.

Kept reaching out to them and begging. For where! Of course, they covered their tracks at one point, but I would still sue them if I have the means. I hate injustice.
CareerRe: Nigerian Employers And Their Slavery Mentality by Baldwretch: 11:06am On Feb 11, 2025
AllBlack:
I remember my last job back in 2011. I didn't just quit, I sued the company to court and made plenty money from them. I don't know why Nigerians like to accept overload of rubbish in the name of E GO BETTER.
Care to share why you sued them? What happened?

As a classroom teacher in one school in the north, I am also on one which happened two years ago or so.

In fact, I threatened to sue them and made it clear, but it seems they just do not give a Bleep. grin grin grin grin grin
Foreign AffairsRe: Hate Speech: Elon Musk And Julius Malema Exchange Words On Social Media by Baldwretch: 9:14am On Feb 10, 2025
God1000:
[s]In what capacity is Elon musk calling for sanctions against Julius Malema?

I so much like the courage of south African politicians, especially Julius Malema, they don't fear or worship any white man[/s]
God made men a little lower than the angels and sin makes them a little better than the devil, that is sadly the case here.

So calling for the genocide of the White race is okay because? On what grounds exactly? Because of what? Are you really okay? A major political party with its chair-head flaming the embers of division, bile, and hatred with so much carelessness, impunity, and recklessness is not that bad as long as it is directed towards those whom you hate. As long as it is America-trump directed. Have you lost your faculties? I would say it again and again and again, O deformed monster, what a pitiful, miserable state have you found yourself, God made you a little lower than the angels but sin has made you a little better than the devils.

God1000:
Is it not hypocrisy for trump and his billionaire friend to deport people from America and then turn around to lecture other countries how and what to do
Slitting the throat of Whiteness is a blatant call for genocide. That is very unacceptable. Julius Malema should be tried and if found culpable, be dealt with appropriately. It is not the same as enacting policies that favour your countrymen at the detriment of others especially the illegal immigrants who migrated into your country. You are at liberty to talk trash if Pres. Trump were deporting African Americans too, but that is not at play here. Even Nigeria does it; all countries deport illegal immigrants, so why should America's case be any different?
PoliticsRe: Trump Shuts Down DOJ Team Investigating Abacha’s Stolen Billions by Baldwretch: 8:15am On Feb 10, 2025
ScamDemicEra:
..... abacha loot no dey finish, for guinness record how much can one person steal ?
For Guinness record, cheesy cheesy cheesy the highest you can steal is a million naira. Oops sorry, I wanted to say a billion.

Abeg, no vex, na one trillion I been wan talk. grin grin grin grin

Wetin dey worry me sef - na hundred trillion billion million. O-O-O-O-O! What is my problem sef, what is my fucking problem, na three hundred quadrillion trillion. grin grin grin grin grin grin. I don steal that one before. grin grin grin grin grin. Dem beat me eh!

O yes, yes, now I know the answer to your question. Na hundred trillion Googol. If you steal hundred quadrillion Googolplex like one of my brothers, e no go still break the record because you still dey follow some people for back. Maybe we should ask Guinness because I don't know the answer to this queshion ooo
BusinessRe: Football (+/other Sports) Betting Season 19 ➜ ➜ ➜ by Baldwretch: 11:12pm On Feb 09, 2025
ptolemy1:
no need of all these long english bro
grin grin grin grin grin tongue tongue tongue tongue
BusinessRe: Football (+/other Sports) Betting Season 19 ➜ ➜ ➜ by Baldwretch: 8:57pm On Feb 09, 2025
ptolemy1:
if they really cared about the FA cup they will not bench their key players
[b]THAT MATCH WAS FIXED. [/b]THE KIND OF MONEY THE,BOOKIES ACROSS THE WORLD WILL GATHER FOR THEM IS WORTH MORETHAN THE USELESS FA CUP THAG THEY WON SEVERAL TIMES
Liverpool isn't just topping the Championship where Plymouth Arygle is struggling really badly to break off from the relegation zone. They are topping the Premier League. They are topping a league Plymouth is sweating-out to get a chance to play in.

Are you expecting them to barge in with full throttle on a team that is w-a-a-a-a-a-a-y below them? As they lost the match with their B or even C team players, wouldn't they still be able to walk and strut about with their shoulders held high on the premise that they actually lost because their main players weren't fielded? Have you thought of, and are you quite knowledgeable of how much pride and ego is imbued into bigger shots when they whip known smaller teams with their B or C team in the host's very home stadium? Is it really about the final results or all the little details between the lines that go unnoticed? Mr. Football is still an entertainment based game where pride, ego, skill, is still at play.

It is not always about the result or match-fixing. That is en embarrassingly low thing to say. Insanely and staggeringly low line of thought.

I am so ashamed to say this, but emancipate yourself from vile thoughts. There is nothing in football that quips that the better team always win. No, the better team doesn't always win. The better team doesn't always draw. They sometimes lose. Liverpool played good football and created more chances. They didn't deserve to lose, but they lost. Do they have to field in their bigger names when they could have easily done the job with B or C players?
Christianity EtcRe: Learning The Quran Online In Today’s World by Baldwretch: 9:11pm On Feb 05, 2025
There is no point learning the Quran. You should read the bible instead. grin grin grin tongue tongue tongue tongue

The Quran got its stories from the bible and from other textual sources.

If you need pointers - where the Quran got each and every story it re-tells, please let me know. Haha! cheesy cheesy cheesy

I would take my time to dig out its sources for you. All the stories that was re-told in the Quran already had sources long before Muhammad was born; he simply plagiarized these sources.

Free free to ask question me any question. You are most welcome. cheesy cheesy cheesy cheesy
SportsRe: Kelechi Iheanacho Joins Middlesbrough On Loan From Sevilla ​ by Baldwretch: 5:02pm On Feb 05, 2025
MatrixCircle:
Taribo was once the world highest paid defender.
We are talking of players who retired in the last 10 years and you pulled up an African that last played for the Super Eagles in, I think, 2005. You pulled up one who retired from active football in 2007. That is more than 15 years ago.

Taribo West played professional football at a time football hadn't been monetized as we have it today. He played active football at a time players weren't getting paid as much as they are getting paid today. He played active football at a time inflation hadn't gotten this bad. And if he did retire in 2007 as we have it on record, it must logically be inferred that he last received good money playing active football at-least 20 years ago. That is twice as long as the cap you put on the YEARS LIMIT.

If you want to raise the bar, fine. I would still argue with you, but there is nothing that shows that Taribo West is broke. Can you give me pointers?
SportsRe: Kelechi Iheanacho Joins Middlesbrough On Loan From Sevilla ​ by Baldwretch: 10:14pm On Feb 04, 2025
MatrixCircle:
Go and verify. Statistics has it that 73% of retired professional footballers go bankrupt after 10 years of retirement from football here in the Western world.
I must nutmeg you this night. Whether you close leg or you no close leg, that one no concern me. cheesy cheesy cheesy cheesy

I would push the ball by force. The ball must surely enter your OC! tongue tongue grin grin grin

By 73%, we are talking, breaking it down in tens; we are talking of seven out of ten professional footballers going bankrupt after ten years of retirement.

This is 2025. Can you mention

1. One African or Hispanic/Latino player who played active football for at-least two or three years around 2015 or thereabout in top-flight footballing nation: England, Germany or Spain (less preferred) and who has declared bankruptcy.

2. Four Brits, Germans, or Spaniards who played active football for at-least four, five or six years in their country of birth or any high-paying footballing nation and has now declared bankruptcy.

Not even factoring in inflation, the cost of living in the country of their birth is relatively higher than an African player who brings the home home; that's why I am raising the bar for the number of years of active football played. Also, the number of African players is relatively lower, that's why I am requiring more on their count. grin grin grin grin grin grin

Think about it, when people churn out statistics to make a claim, it is because it is not true.
SportsRe: Kelechi Iheanacho Joins Middlesbrough On Loan From Sevilla ​ by Baldwretch: 9:17pm On Feb 04, 2025
MatrixCircle:
Which money ?? For England. If he wants to make money he should have gone to Saudi.
Soon retires probably at 35 , no pension, no profession to fall back on. Then next 10 years at mere 45 when others in different profession are striving you declare bankruptcy for being jobless for 10 years as ex footballer. That's footballer for you. Struggles after football career. Ask Kanu.
A few months or years of labour is more than enough duration of time (some career) to put bread on your table and on the tables of all your dependents for a lifetime. It's not really about slaving for months, for years, or for decades, but how much you get paid when you actually work and I am not talking of their gross, but their net pay. Most professional footballers get in a week what regular doctors earn in a year. Just a week o! That is very unsettling and mind boggling if you think about it.

A professional footballer of British or Spanish descent who lives in the same country or city as the club-side he retired from has earned more than enough money to stay afloat for many years. The weekly wages of retired professional footballers of African descent who choose to relocate to their country of origin after their footballing career must have elapsed is more than enough to be made for life even with so much extravagance.
SportsRe: Kelechi Iheanacho Joins Middlesbrough On Loan From Sevilla ​ by Baldwretch: 8:59pm On Feb 04, 2025
Freshtruth:
His Father kill this boy career due to greed and pep Gardiola who is an African racist bury is career how can u sell a boy who scored 16goald from the bench at 21yrs of age to liechester? If ihenacho did had accept Fc Porto move rather than Mancity deal i believe he would have been still be balling in some of the elite clubs today. How wish he career ztill blossom well no be to go saudi Arabia go cash out? Look cristano today he follows process e no rush Barcelona want him then in their academy but he chooses to develop at sporting, use manutd as a stepping stone to secure real Madrid. Now be is enjoying is retirement as the highest paid football in the world at 40yr old unheard off
FC Porto over Man City? Portugal over England? Wonders shall never end!

Please if this is a joke, please stop it. grin grin grin grin
Foreign AffairsRe: FBI Agents In Trump Probes Face Dismissal — Report by Baldwretch: 8:50pm On Feb 02, 2025
THEDEEPSIGHT:
You have got it upside down. By all means let him take political vengeance against the politicians he feels instigated it. But touching the civilk servants is wrong. The message is that in future they must not dare investigate a powerful politician. That is all shades of wrong. I dont know how you guys can defend this, but its ok. I know Trumpists will defend even murder.
The presidency is the highest position of all elected positions in most countries. Whether you agree with his policies or not matters little. Investigating and probing a president whether sitting, incumbent, ex, or whatever must be done with utmost care, diligence and awe and should be avoided as much as possible. It is not a trite position where you pull the trigger for slight or minor provocations especially for cases where re-election is a possibility. So civil servants who witch-hunt a sitting president because of a televised speech he made after an election is okay? Is that really something to investigate a president for? Are you fucking serious?

If our of our own arms, the EfCC, had done something similar to Peter Obi because he alleged widespread rigging, thumb-printing and what-have-you, imploring his supporters to troop out en mass and resist the handing over, would that be a just course for the EFCC to probe him? Should you even do it in good faith? Or maybe Jonathan!
Foreign AffairsRe: FBI Agents In Trump Probes Face Dismissal — Report by Baldwretch: 4:46am On Feb 02, 2025
blowjohn:
I agree.
U cannot witch hunt me just because u want me off the ballot..... Then expect to work for me when I come into power.

It's a dangerous thing to keep frenemies near u.

Fire them. Let them go work for kamal Harris
People think we forget things very quickly, but our scroll of remembrance is firmly by our side. grin grin grin grin tongue tongue tongue

Five or ten years down the line, we still remember stuff like it was yesterday.

The president isn't going to remind us or these witch-hunters of how much hate they exude, of how they tarnished his image, and of how they made him feel at that time, but we still remember these things. We know how he felt because we felt the same. It is just and perfectly fitting that those who were embroiled in these stuff be fired and relieve of their duties with immediate effect. The injury in this case is clearly the case of a just punishment. Hahahaha!

A big lesson to many that government officials must never entangle themselves in political witch-hunt because power belongs neither to them nor even to the officials they witch-hunt. It belongs to GOD (the people). cheesy cheesy cheesy cheesy cheesy FIRE ALL OF THEM!
Foreign AffairsRe: FBI Agents In Trump Probes Face Dismissal — Report by Baldwretch: 8:30pm On Feb 01, 2025
adioolayi:
USA .... Hallmark of Democracyhuh

Hallmark of democracy my foot!!!

The rottenness in that Nation's democracy is now out for all to see...

He started with firing those in the justice department and now moving to the FBI agent....he is sacking them for doing their job!

America democracy is also nonsense!
DropsMic:
I hope you’re not a Christian because Jesus didn’t care about Black people either.
Babangidapikin:
Strong Institution that is what the U.S is know for , this Dude is practically breaking the institutions ..WTF
OT2024:
This is vindictive.

There's no doubt Trump is on revenge mission. I used to think American leaders are above such sentiments. Now, I know I had been wrong.

But then, no empire lasts forever. I believe this is the beginning of the end of US imperial authority in human history.
Two wrongs always make a right.

Ah, two wrongs always make a very good, dead right. Hehehe!

You witch-hunt me at my lowest ebbs when I am a extremely powerless and vulnerable; I witch-hunt you and get my pound of flesh when you, too, are facing similar fate. I guess we are both right, but let no one come up with any patronizing nonsense that Trump's vindictiveness is not justified. It absolutely is. He is fucking right in these vindictive firings and sackings and I am brutally sure that God, his God, is with him. Hehe!
TravelRe: I Want To Return Back To Nigeria From UK Permanently by Baldwretch: 8:25pm On Jan 31, 2025
Namaster:
First of all, you need to realise that depression is like body odour. It'll follow you EVERYWHERE you go.

If you feel so depressed that you're already suicidal, you need to get it treated ASAP.

DON'T let your depression push you into making a life-threatening MISTAKE.

TACKLE your depression in UK.
DON'T make any DRASTIC decision until you've done that.

If you think your life is HARD in UK, Nigeria would make it look like a tutorial.

Returning to Nigeria should NEVER be an option unless you are 83 and waiting to DIE.
I cannot disagree with you. Why would I?

Ha! Mogbe! See me oo! Seee, I am asking the attendants besides me to fill your pantry with a thousand bottles of chilled, teeth-disjointing, spine-relaxing Maltina. tongue tongue tongue tongue grin grin grin
Foreign AffairsRe: Mark Zuckerberg's Meta Agrees To Pay Trump $25m For Account Ban Settlement by Baldwretch: 9:07pm On Jan 30, 2025
If I were Donald John Trump, grin grin grin grin I would spit, not on this man's miserable face, but on his wretched soul. And on others, too!

I would dismember and disfigure the bastard and others and then desecrate their graves - pouring shit and filth all over, severing members and organs beyond recognition; yes, to cadavers; sprinkling rubbish and filth all over. Shit everywhere. A landscape, a graveyard full of shit and filth and mess!

As if that is not enough, I would take these pitiful cadaver, the bodies, into the wilderness of the nations; there, I would judge all of them face to face.

Olo.ribu's! Olor.iburuku somebodies! God damn Mark Zuckerberg, Meta, and all her employees, all of them, no exceptions, a quadrillion times before he finally damns them. Una for kukuma pay Donald Trump twice as much of what the US government budgets annually for running the country na. huh huh huh huh huh
European Football (EPL, UEFA, La Liga)Re: Who's Playing Who In UCL Play-off Round: City To Face Real Madrid Or Bayern by Baldwretch: 12:02pm On Jan 30, 2025
Ibrahimado:
Yeye format, with their guessing work
grin grin grin grin grin grin

No, it's more like tennis-styled seeding. Nothing weird about this. wink wink wink wink
European Football (EPL, UEFA, La Liga)Re: Who's Playing Who In UCL Play-off Round: City To Face Real Madrid Or Bayern by Baldwretch: 12:00pm On Jan 30, 2025
Ibrahimado:
Yeye format, with their guessing work
Edit: Duplicated comment!
BusinessRe: Football (+/other Sports) Betting Season 19 ➜ ➜ ➜ by Baldwretch: 6:17am On Jan 29, 2025
AlabiKILLER2023:
Didn't get you


Rephrase please
Please share screenshot (of the winning) for the sake of those who do not follow him or who are not on Twitter. shocked shocked shocked
BusinessRe: Football (+/other Sports) Betting Season 19 ➜ ➜ ➜ by Baldwretch: 6:16am On Jan 29, 2025
Joeblaze26:
Up till now you still find it difficult to accept the fact that some people have such amounts of money to stake on accumulative odds? These guys are made already.

Why are you so stubborn with your poor mentality?!
cheesy cheesy cheesy cheesy cheesy cheesy cheesy
BusinessRe: Football (+/other Sports) Betting Season 19 ➜ ➜ ➜ by Baldwretch: 9:12pm On Jan 28, 2025
AlabiKILLER2023:
Mr Banks

Have done it again



111m
That's at least 1200+ odds on a 50k stake? Hahaha, peak degenerate gambling.

But wait fes, how I go pam plenty games on top 50k stake say I dey find 111million? Omo, this one na confirm Olympus of degeneracy. How very degenerate can you get? If I met Mr Banks in person, I would threaten to report him to his mother. cheesy cheesy cheesy cheesy cheesy cheesy grin grin Seems the world is a football field; you, I, and other gamblers in the wild are the players and Mr Banks is our goalkeeper! Ah an! 111m?

Please share screenshot for the sake of those who do not follow him or who are not on Twitter. grin grin grin grin grin
PoliticsRe: Pictures Of Yenagoa, The Bayelsa State Capital by Baldwretch: 9:09pm On Jan 27, 2025
Kafirbigot:
Sophisticated SW .

This is ILORIN in Kwara State to be Precise ..

Dey play . grin
Where in Ilorin?

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 25 pages)