₦airaland Forum

[s]

princesweetman2:
poster above me must be a Igbo or a helpless fidifi supporter.

Said Baba 2019-2023

[/s]

sarrki:
Be careful young man

It’s not easy as you thought

Igbos are everywhere doing legitimate business

We should be careful

It won’t spell well if the bubbles is burst

There is no bubble bursting... Chase them out of your farm... let them go to the bushes...

The Farm is the source of Living of many people over der....

If your source of livelihood is destroyed you will understand how far

I think the Man Should be Left alone....

Saraki is Really a BIG BONE on these Guys

Desperation @Its peak...
Nigerians Collect your Money..


Whether it's Pmb or kingibe.... Kick dem out!!

Reading was Sweet Until I got to Delivering Lagos to Pmb....


That is an Unhumane thing to think of

Lawalatm:
Keep sentiments, tribalism and hatred aside, Osinbajo is the type of President Nigerians need..........he is indeed a progressive and listening President. I wish APC cabals can see beyond sentiments and do the needful

Please click 'Like' if you agree

i think so

"K1 De Ultimate endorse Kayode Akiolu for APC House of Assembly"


APC house of Assembly?



APC get House of Assembly

tomakint:
Read the two court judgements that have laid to rest the controversy surrounding how Saraki and Ekweremadu can be impeached.

#CASE_ONE

Asogwa v Chukwu
(2003) 17 WRN 71

The Court of appeal ruled that section 92(2) which deals with impeachment of Speaker of a State House of Assembly which is the equivalent Section of Section 50(2) at the National level for impeachment of Senate President is 2/3 of the entire House and not 2/3 of members sitting after quorum have been formed.
This completely nullifies the gutter arguments by some lawyers, APC Nwc members and lawmakers in the Senate who are canvassing that what is required to impeach the Senate President is 2/3 of 37 Senators who forms quorum which is 24 Senators.

The landmark ruling of the Appeal Court was
Clear that 2/3 majority required by section 90 subsection 2 for impeachment of speaker of a State House of Assembly is the 2/3 of all Members of the State House of Assembly and not 2/3 of Members sitting after quorum have been formed.Note section 90 sub 2 for impeachment of Speaker of a State House of Assembly is the equivalent of section 50 sub 2 for impeachment of Senate President.

#CASE_TWO

National Assembly V President (2003) 9 NWLR (Part 824) 104 at 132.

In this case the House of Reps and Senate in 2002 overrided President Obasanjo's veto using the arguments that it was 2/3 of the members present after quorum have been formed. Reps had about 203 Members while Senate had 50 Senators who overrided Obasanjo's Veto in 2002.

The Court of Appeal in deciding the matter in year 2003 ruled that the constitutional provision of 2/3 cannot be Misinterpreted to mean 2/3 of members present after quorum have been formed.

The Appeal Court in the landmark judgement delivered by Justice Oguntade JCA( as he then was) declared that two-thirds majority of each House means two-thirds of the membership of the Senate(109) and House of Representatives(360) which is 73 Senators and 240 Reps members and nothing else.

Note, the courts have by these two judgements above and more laid to rest the issue of interpretation of the kind of 2/3 required to Impeach a Speaker/Senate President, Override the President Veto and Remove the Chairman of the code of conduct tribunal which is 2/3 of the entire composition of the relevant House and not 2/3 of members present after quorum have been formed.

Please pass this across to the noise maker called Adam's Oshimole, his boys in the Senate and their paymasters.

Adams!! Over to You

Soooo Unfortunate.... Bello ! Bello! Bello!

[s]

Butterflyle0:
PMB SAK!!

[/s]

Concisenews:
In a three-page statement he issued on Monday, Ozekhome noted that the “1999 Constitution requires at least 73 senators” to impeach Saraki.

/

THE TRUTH!!

Is it the People that Should Leave their Ancestral Homes for the killer Herdsmen that will Vote him or who

Na wa oooo

RUBBISH LUBBISH

owukpa:
adaji

who is adaji

Tolexander:
Why putting a ring on it again when he has been putting his rods into her!

I wonder ooo... the honey has been taken so no need for Honeymoon

BafanaBafana:
Ok. I thought calling someone mumu is an insult.

who in the church called him so?

Modarun:
please where did you see such a law? They even discussed this at the Journalist round table in TVC the TV channek owned by Tinubu. Buhari was never in the mix when Saraki won, he made it clear he was willing to work with anyone who emerged. So stop bringing Buhari into it. Tinubu started all this nonsense, In his desperate attempt to control the National Assembly as if he was the key factor that led to the victory of the APC. for your info the APC won simply cos the likes of Saraki and Kwankaso worked against their party to help them. But instead of Tinubu to respect the agreements made before the merger, he allowed his selfish interest destroy the good thing they had going for them at the APC. Buhari defeated Goodluck with just less than 2million. Saraki, Kwankwaso and the rest of the state governors and nPDP faithfuls wouldvhave easily polled that to the PDP. so what gives Tinubu the audacity to act like he is critical to the APC success alone?
Below is a picture of some of the So called APC senators that wants to vote out Saraki. These same guys they are listing here were amongst those who accompanied Saraki on his visit to OBJ. if you look carefully you would see Some of them, they guy with white beards is the Former Governor of Zamfara Sen. Ahmed Yerima.

lol you guys should just stop being pathetic, even if they used force to remove Saraki, the Supreme Court would still reinstate him cos thats the law.
What I find surprising is the amount of energy they put in, before it was Goodluck that hindered the APC from working or performing now its Saraki.

My brother, Did u read and Digest my Summation.... We are Saying the Same thing... Saraki cannot be impeached