BishopMagic's Posts
Nairaland Forum › BishopMagic's Profile › BishopMagic's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 (of 91 pages)
[size=18pt]Nigerian Govt owned company[/size] You have two cows and hire a foriegn company to manage it after the govt owned company goes bankrupt from selling the grass the two cows need to graze. The foriegn company is then paid the sum of buying 6 cows to manage one after the other is sold as part of the management take over. In 2 yrs time, the foriegn company then renegotiates the original terms wanting more money to buy grass from abroad to feed the single cow. Meanwhile, the govt still subsidizes milk imports through powerful milk retailing cabals while the lone cow's milk is exported to buy grass. [size=18pt]Nigerian Economy[/size] You have just one cow . You can't milk it because the Fulani Boy is constantly sucking it [img]http://4.bp..com/-41ps3W0QlaI/VLQVmTanFdI/AAAAAAABe78/lyPV70T7pFk/s1600/cow.jpg[/img] |
INTROVERT:If you have seen Biggie's Get Money video. The court intro scene with biggie picking his nails as lawyers argue over bull then thats how Dasuki appeared. |
CreampieAngela:The funniest thing is that I have never listened to Kanu or Radio Biafra. |
BishopMagic: |
IbnSultaan:I believe you want to say dis-arm rather than did armed... Well, start by disarming your Fulani Militias in the Middle Belt and your Bokos in the NE. |
[size=18pt]Ojukwu On Islamization And Arabization Of Black Africa[/size] https://dailypost.ng/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/ojukwu.jpg The Biafran struggle is, on another plane, a resistance to the Arab-Muslim expansionism which has menaced and ravaged the African continent for twelve centuries. As early as the first quarter of the seventh century, the Arabs, a people from the Near-East, evolved Islam not just as a religion but as a cover for their insatiable territorial ambitions. By the tenth century they had overrun and occupied, among other places, Egypt and North Africa. Had they stopped there, we would not today be faced with the wicked and unholy collusion we are fighting against. On the contrary, they cast their hungry and envious eyes across the Sahara on to the land of the Negroes. Our Biafran ancestors remained immune from the Islamic contagion. From the middle years of the last century Christianity was established in our land. In this way we came to be a predominantly Christian people. We came to stand out as a non-Muslim island in a raging Islamic sea. Throughout the period of the ill-fated Nigerian experiment, the Muslims hoped to infiltrate Biafra by peaceful means and quiet propaganda, but failed. Then the late Ahmadu Bello, the Sarduana of Sokoto tried, by political and economic blackmail and terrorism, to convert Biafrans settled in Northern Nigeria to Islam. His hope was that these Biafrans on dispersion would then carry Islam to Biafra, and by so doing give the religion political control of the area. The crises which agitated the so-called independent Nigeria from 1962 gave these aggressive proselytisers the chance to try converting us by force. It is now evident why the fanatic Arab-Muslim states like Algeria, Egypt and the Sudan have come out openly and massively to support and aid Nigeria in her present war of genocide against us. These states see militant Arabism as a powerful instrument for attaining power in the world. Biafra is one of the few African states untainted by Islam. Therefore, to militant Arabism, Biafra is a stumbling block to their plan for controlling the whole continent. This control is fast becoming manifest in the Organisation of African Unity. On the question of the Middle East, the Sudanese crisis, in the war between Nigeria and Biafra, militant Arabism has succeeded in imposing its point of view through blackmail and bluster. It has threatened African leaders and governments with inciting their Muslim minorities to rebellion if the governments adopted an independent line on these questions. In this way an O.A.U that has not felt itself able to discuss the genocide in the Sudan and Biafra, an O.A.U. that has again and again advertised its ineptitude as a peace-maker, has rushed into open condemnation of Israel over the Middle East dispute. Indeed in recent times, by its performance, the O.A.U. might well be an Organisation of Arab Unity -Emeka Ojukwu (1933 - 2011) was the only president of the short lived Republic of Biafra. |
They believed every outragous lie against Jonathan being behind boko haram. It did not stop there... rather than rally against the evil the north unleashed - they went on to mock Jonathan as clueless. The slaves even mocked Jonathan's meek background. The clueless shoeless one who rose to be elected by them must go for the aristocratic cow herdsman and his beautiful wife. This is slavery and nothing more. How many opposition figures fighting for independence and post independence have come out from the north? How many northerners have been recorded in history to oppose any of the heads of states that came from the north? Not a single damn one. Even Buhari defended Abacha when he was in power! But when a christian minority from the south with humble background became President, the north suddenly became an opposition force. Yoruba, your slavery is already engraved in marble. |
jakiedudu:You are just finding out the reality of the true nature of things in the middle belt that have existed for close to a thousand years. Nigeria can never be a nation as long as there exist a people who chose to be unproductive but wait to steal the resources and sweat of other regions. Shekau and his Bokos are a northern agenda to hold Nigeria to ransome which some slaves in the south chose to overlook. How can Jonathan be behind Boko Haram? What concerns Orisejfor and CAN with Boko Haram? Today the fools prefer to Sanusi Lamido embracing Buhari in Aso Rock than Jonathan with Orisetjafor forgetting that as Emir, Sanusi is both the spiritual and military leader of Muslims in Kano. Let the Jihad spread accross the middle-belt and Southwest. |
Nigeria is truly a slave nation. Lord Lugard's only reasons for adopting indirect rule in the north were: 1. The fear of a power vacuum resulting from the abolishing of the Caliphate system which most likely will usher in a revolutionary Mahdist movement against the small British forces administering a colony of 30,0000 sq miles united under an extremist Islamic ideology. Lugard thus had no option than to appoint successors to the overthrown traditional establishments and provide much needed legitimacy and backing. 2. Slavery was well entrenched in the north and the only way to make money from the region was to rely on the Hausa-Fulani merchants and Oligarchs who employed slave labor in their farms. The Hausa merchants supplied local produce to the trading board who in turn supplied imported goods back to them for distribution. This why slavery persisted in the north up till the 1930's. The slave labor and fertile lands both came from the middle-belt. The embarrassing reality was that slavery in Nigeria underwent a ‘slow death’, to use the opportune term of Hogendorn and Lovejoy (1993). Although Lugard’s pronouncements in the early post-conquest period seemed to suggest it would no longer be tolerated, it was evidently difficult to simply halt the process in northern Nigeria in view of how deeply it was embedded (Ubah 1991). Moreover, and this is part of the ambiguity of the colonial attitude, it was necessary to keep traditional rulers on board as part of a longer term strategy to counter real or imagined radicalism. Klein (1998) records similar problematic attitudes in the Francophone regions of West Africa. Even relative liberals such as Temple (1918) argued that the system of domestic slavery should not be summarily dismantled. Slaves whose original ethnic identity had been abolished were still working within the Hausa system in the first quarter of the twentieth century (Figure 10). A decree finally abolishing slavery was only promulgated in 1936, although by this time, almost all those former slaves who maintained an ethnic identity had left for their home area (Olusanya 1966).If una like, make una dey drink brukutu dey shout we are northerners |
nabiz:The Fulani north plan of conquest is slow, steady and calculated and lasts generations. It follows the same path of attrition to wear down the people with ceaseless conflicts until the capitulate for sake of peace. The most discriminated people today in Nigeria is the middle belt christian and not the Igbos. The north has no clue as how to reign in the Niger-Delta and Igbo tribes because we are not in any way ready to enter slavery. |
kettykings:Rival minority tribes . Maybe Eggons or Ombatse. Don't know. The narrative never mentioned the tribe. The fragmented state of the middle belt is testament to migratory tribes who settled in the vast, fertile and game rich plains of the Niger-Benue trough. So it might be any tribe within the current middle belt. |
jakiedudu:The Fulanis are not becoming a terror, this is what they have been doing for over 500yrs. The Middle-Belt should do what Nations do which is to defend their lands and identity or die. It is that simple. The better south comprising of Niger Delta and Igbos will not be enslaved under the Caliphate. This is what Biafra is all about. I already have a thread on this matter since yesterday https://www.nairaland.com/2565557/1902-quote-fulani-rampage-middle |
The embarrassing reality was that slavery in Nigeria underwent a ‘slow death’, to use the opportune term of Hogendorn and Lovejoy (1993). Although Lugard’s pronouncements in the early post-conquest period seemed to suggest it would no longer be tolerated, it was evidently difficult to simply halt the process in northern Nigeria in view of how deeply it was embedded (Ubah 1991). Moreover, and this is part of the ambiguity of the colonial attitude, it was necessary to keep traditional rulers on board as part of a longer term strategy to counter real or imagined radicalism. Klein (1998) records similar problematic attitudes in the Francophone regions of West Africa. Even relative liberals such as Temple (1918) argued that the system of domestic slavery should not be summarily dismantled. Slaves whose original ethnic identity had been abolished were still working within the Hausa system in the first quarter of the twentieth century (Figure 10). A decree finally abolishing slavery was only promulgated in 1936, although by this time, almost all those former slaves who maintained an ethnic identity had left for their home area (Olusanya 1966). At the same time, colonial policy promoted the use of Hausa and Islamic courts, which had the contrary effect of cementing the power of the former slavers. Indirect rule kept the Muslim rulers of outlying settlements such as Keffi and Ibi in place. Indirect rule also maintained these islands of Hausa dominancet hrough the colonial era and preserved their authority through a court system controlled by Muslim qadis even in rather marginal Islamic areas. Fulɓe pastoralists could count on the incursions of their cattle into fields of crops being subject to only minor penalties in the courts when they were opposed to non-Muslims. It also became advantageous for local rulers to either convert to Islam or adopt its outward form. Turaki (1993:99) observes; It can hardly be doubted that the practice of placing large numbers of pagans under Fulani District Heads and supporting the authority of these by the powers of government when and where necessary, led to an extension of Islam. … The pagan headman tended to start wearing Muslim dress especially when they were called to meetings at the District Headquarters and this donning of the garb of the Muslim often proved the first step to Islam.This in turn has had a direct impact on issues such as the boundaries of post-colonial Nigerian states. The original Kaduna state, for example, was a long narrow strip that stretched from Katsina on the northern border down through Zaria. Kaduna included many of the communities in Southern Zaria that were subjugated by Zazzau in the slave-raiding era. Even when the Katsina Emirate became a separate state, the remaining rump of Kaduna State persisted with this awkward conjunction, binding together resentful minority communities, generally oriented towards Christianity, with their former antagonists from further north. Historically this has often been the source of conflict and this state of affairs is likely to continue. |
BishopMagic:As can be seen, your ancestors in the middle-belt brought this calamity upon your generation. This is what awaits Odua in the near future. |
Wilson-Haffenden (1930:45), commenting on the impact of slaving on plains settlements in Nassarawa Province, says; "The remaining inhabitants of such towns fled to the hills in all directions; those who approached the eastern and north-eastern confines of the Province, until they learned how to defend themselves, were further raided by the Headhunting tribes who inhabit these hilly localities. … Such was the state of the Province when the arrival of Sir Frederick Lugard put a stop to the slave-raiding, and evolved law and order out of chaos and ruin". (Sciortino 1920:5) |
jakiedudu:In describing the Nigerian Middle Belt, Wallace (1902) observe: "In Nassarawa country, a once fertile and populous province, one can only view the remains and ruins of large and totally deserted towns, bearing witness to the desolation wrought by 100 years of internecine strife and slave-raiding by the Fulani." (W. Wallace [1902] quoted in Sciortino 1920:5) Today, nothing has changed! Online Reference: http://www.rogerblench.info/Anthropology/Africa/The%20present%20in%20the%20past.pdf (pg: 6) |
22 Days to go... The Schmitta is here |
CUM4WHAT:Buffon |
Things can only get worse as buhari reels out his ministerial list which will be based on the lenght of his final appointees beard. This administration has since jettisoned the current budget passed by the last senate, has refused to fund existing projects all in the name of probe and is yet to even reel out any infrastructural project of his own. |
Don't bother clicking on that wormhole blog. Tom killed himself after finding out that Amy was a tranny. |
Binb:Your Allah is the stone perch of shaitan |
Very good. Muslims should take a cue from this. If it was just one Muslim man or woman, he or she would have been declared an apostate and summarily sentenced to death. |
God has put eminity in their camp. Slaves |
The wild west has an OK Coral standoff. Last man standing gets to lick Buhari's crusty dangly wrinkled balls |
Demmzy15:Quaran- 33:50 has since abrogated that verse you quote. Your Quaran details the metorphosis of your Prophet from peace loving and tolerant to a fascist blood lusting despot. The last years of your prophet's life coincided with the zenith of his life and influence. Muslim scholars point to older verses where contradiction occurs with earlier verses. The norm is to accept the latest verse against the earliest. "O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful unto thee thy wives unto whom thou hast paid their dowries, and those whom thy right hand possesseth of those whom Allah hath given thee as spoils of war, and the daughters of thine uncle on the father's side and the daughters of thine aunts on the father's side, and the daughters of thine uncles on the mother's side and the daughters of thine aunts on the mother's side who emigrated with thee, and a believing woman if she give herself unto the Prophet and the Prophet desire to ask her in marriage a privilege for thee only, not for the [rest of] believers. We are aware of that which We enjoined upon them concerning their wives and those whom their right hand possess that thou mayst be free from blame, for Allah is Forgiving, Merciful." |
OPCNAIRALAND:Coming from a baboon tribalistic fool like you |
patmaine:The truth is always very bizare to slaves like you. |
patmaine:Mbaka's zombie fool. Catholics are pagan heathen worshippers of baal |
Demmzy15:Long since been abrogated |
The Catholic Church is against Israel just like their Jihadists. They are united in one cause only which is to rid Jerusalem of the Jews. The catholic church is also happy to turn the blind eye where Islamic lunatics decimate Christian population. The Catholic church is using Islamic lunatics to stop their members converting to true Christianity. This is the pact between Rome and the vile Muhammadeans. |
Macelliot:You fool. I never tagged any Christian a pagan but rightly pointed out that Catholiscm is not Christianity and will never be. In the context of that thread, I stated that only God's divine assistance can restore the Nation of Biafra and not military might as in 1966. You later came in with the argument that Israel and Biafrans do not practice the same religion from where I then asked you which religion did Jesus practice when he was on earth? To which you never answered. Have you bothered to ask yourself why Boko Haram has stopped attacking Catholic churches and only concentrates on protestant churches? Your catholic church pulled out of CAN in 2012 on the orders of your pope and with it the bombings stopped. Your Pope has since aligned himself and your church with Islamic jihad. This is why the likes of that sodomite priest Mbaka suddenly began campaigning for that jihadist Buhari. |
Nigeria is truly a slave nation. Lord Lugard's only reasons for adopting indirect rule in the north were: 1. The fear of a power vacuum resulting from the abolishing of the Caliphate system which most likely will usher in a revolutionary Mahdist movement against the small British forces administering a colony of 30,0000 sq miles united under an extremist Islamic ideology. Lugard thus had no option than to appoint successors to the overthrown traditional establishments and provide much needed legitimacy and backing. 2. Slavery was well entrenched in the north and the only way to make money from the region was to rely on the Hausa-Fulani merchants and Oligarchs who employed slave labor in their farms. The Hausa merchants supplied local produce to the trading board who in turn supplied imported goods back to them for distribution. This why slavery persisted in the north up till the 1930's. The embarrassing reality was that slavery in Nigeria underwent a ‘slow death’, to use the opportune term of Hogendorn and Lovejoy (1993). Although Lugard’s pronouncements in the early post-conquest period seemed to suggest it would no longer be tolerated, it was evidently difficult to simply halt the process in northern Nigeria in view of how deeply it was embedded (Ubah 1991). Moreover, and this is part of the ambiguity of the colonial attitude, it was necessary to keep traditional rulers on board as part of a longer term strategy to counter real or imagined radicalism. Klein (1998) records similar problematic attitudes in the Francophone regions of West Africa. Even relative liberals such as Temple (1918) argued that the system of domestic slavery should not be summarily dismantled. Slaves whose original ethnic identity had been abolished were still working within the Hausa system in the first quarter of the twentieth century (Figure 10). A decree finally abolishing slavery was only promulgated in 1936, although by this time, almost all those former slaves who maintained an ethnic identity had left for their home area (Olusanya 1966). |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 (of 91 pages)


