Looks like many people forgot that lion hunt in group while tiger is solitary animal. The fact that lion can take down a elephant is because they hunt in group. Yes one alpha male got a chance to kill elephant, but just because one of it can kill doesnt mean other can. A number of elephant killed by single male can be counted with one hand. While hundreds of it was killed by group mixed with lioness.

And what makes me laugh is someone say tiger hardly kill elephant, looks like the one who type it is lion fanboy. Some fact: bengal tiger kill an adult rhino kaziranga national park alone last 2014, and adult elephant alone. Sibefeen tiger once kill a brown bear and a saltwater crocodile.

And yes its a fact that tiger hunt animal that are smaller than it body size, they do it because its easier and they only need it for itself unlike lion that got a lot of family to feed which need them to hunt bigger prey.

If somebody ask who is the king then the answer is lion, and you ask why tiger fanboy? Example, a king is someone full of pride and mighty aura and charismatic to lead their people, and that is lion. While tiger is stronger, they are a lone hunter.

Tiger vs lion ?
If its one on one, tiger win. If its about a number lions win. I mean what can one soldier do when he is fighting a whole army? While its true that just because lion hunt in group doesn't mean they will lose in one on one fight. And lion kill more tiger than tiger does? Okay where is the source? I never seen one, and at this point i just think about some kid who randomly search information about lion on google. And i've seen more data about tiger killing lion.

And i'm getting tired of this lion vs tiger shit. For god sake its a fight, where (mainly) body size , instinct, and luck increase the chance of winning.