@MrPresident1 your comment are beautifully idiotic!

Don't you think b4 you talk? - denying the possibility of the story will automatically makes all the stories in the bible becomes ridiculous. - i really like the game u wanna play though

Was the flood real? yes, according 2 what u bible said.

Was the flood wordwide? yes, the bible evidence strongly support that it was indeed universal. god commanded noah to build an ark to save both a remnant of humanity and the animal creation. But if the flood were local, then all the effort to build it would be totally unnecessary and the whole story becomes rediculous. Noah could have just trotted down the road a few miles & escaped


If Noah ark story is allegorical why did peter draw comparison btw D historic flood judgement & D coming fire judgement, 2pet. 3: 3-7: states definitely that as god once destroyed the world by a flood, he will someday likewise through a fire. - is hellfire allegorical too?


Why not take up a bible & educate yourself - delusional folks!

Vicoch:
atheism loading.........78 percentage.

Welcome to the path of light - searching for god or waiting for a miracle to happen, is like searching for a money you never lost - i wish you well as you continue this journey of self-freedom from what you have been indoctrinated with from childhood

KingEbukaNaija:


10th and 11th CE - I clearly said 800 to 900 years before 1833

You are unwittingly wrong!

Science began in the BCE around the 2nd century - do you know anything about physics? if yes, then, you should know Archimedes Of Syracuse ( 287 - 212 BCE) - he propounded the famous "law of Archimedes" - he invented war machines - he invented hydraulic pump etc


Eratosthenes of cyrene (275 - 192 BCE)


Aristarchus of samos (310 - 230 BCE)

Democritus of Abdera - was one of the first scientist to proposed that matter was made up of atoms


Thales of Miletus - he was one of the first scientist to give rational explanation of rational phenomenon - is idea to look for deeper cause was the true beginning of science & philosophy.


Aristotle of Stagira (384 - 322) - He is one of the founder of modern science,
ETC.


Science has long being in existence before jesus was born - science is in no way related to religion.


LIFE NECESSITIES BEGET SCIENCE!!!

KingEbukaNaija:


I always say that Christians played a massive part in the progress of science after its nascence . The word "scientist" only came into use first in 1833 while the Muslims started it 800 to 900 years before that time . So there is no such as who is the muslim scientist who started it since science began between the 10 th and 11 th century . You get ?

You mean 10th and 11th C.E or B.C.E?

KingEbukaNaija:


This guy sef ! I told you that modern science in the real sense of what it is started in the Muslim world and that Atheists were more concerned with philosophy and political theories . Atheism has nothing to do with science . It's being religion .

Who were the muslim scientist? they don't have name or is this just an assumption from you? so it ain't christian scientist anymore?

I challenged all the christians on this forum to prove how christianity/religion beget science but no one was able to come up with any valid or invalid point. I also stated that all the early scientist were NON-BELIEVERS - no one was able to disprove this too - why do christians now makes erroneous conclusion that christianity beget science? - it's absolute foolishness.


Christianity didn't beget science - athiesm didn't beget science.


NECESSITY IS THE MOTHER OF SCIENCE!!!

kestolove95:
No wonder Christians Hate Muslims cos dey preach against alcohol

Stop fooling around gal, err'thing you've been taught from birth till now is illusions - stop being a slave to ancient books written by primitive men & start using your brain

4everGod:


A scienist is different from a medical practitioner. This is plain english. Scientists discover. Doctors apply what was discovered. I think you need to reboot your brain.

Sorry to say this: YOUR IQ IS EXTREMELY LOW!

Say, i'm a software engineer & i've a software you must have before you can surf the net - does using it automatically makes you an engineer?


I'm a mechanical engineer i build a car - does that makes the driver and owner of the car an enginee?


i'm a funiture man and i build chairs, tables etc for my customer - does that make my customers a furniture man?


I'm a scientist i make discoveries for the medical school of thought to use and better peoples lives - does that make the doctors and patients a scientist?

Bro, you not making any sense with your respone.

KingEbukaNaija:


Some doctors can be scientists . I hope you know what a scientist is . Anyone can be a scientist

Some doctors are actually scientists but the % is extremely low, but being a doctor won't automatically makes you to be a scientist - you've to study along the line of science to be one

4everGod:



When we call you a dumbo now you will start crying.


M.D.s are practitioners, not scientists. While they apply scientific advances in their practice, that does not make them "scientists". It's safe to say that a large percentage of medical doctors do employ the scientific method with respect to how they assess and treat their patients.


Educate yourself. Dont just argue for sake of relevance. Read read read.

I'm confused bro, do employing a scientific method to treat a patient makes me a scientist? so why do they go to medical school? do you know the meaning of science and scientist at all? - if yes, please explain, if no, keep mute.

KingEbukaNaija:


The word scientist was not used until in 1833 . But anyway , science is based on research , experimentation and doctors as far as 4 000 BC can be described as scientists since they supposedly made discoveries themselves .

Some doctors are scientists .

Ebuka, I am here to learn and to teach not to argue, that's why i stopped replying 4evergods since his points are not making sense to me - to be frank with you doctors are not scientist and scientists are not doctors

4everGod:



When we call you a dumbo now you will start crying.


M.D.s are practitioners, not scientists. While they apply scientific advances in their practice, that does not make them "scientists". It's safe to say that a large percentage of medical doctors do employ the scientific method with respect to how they assess and treat their patients.


Educate yourself. Dont just argue for sake of relevance. Read read read.

Kkkkk

taurus25:

lol...you guys have strength sha. that dude is just all over the thread dissapointingly posting rubbish. Imagine someone being asked for scientist of the BCE, quickly running to google to check christains involved in science and technology. And hes feeling like a debunker lmao

It's worrying bro - christians thought science began in the C.E - imagine someone telling me that medical doctors are scientist, today is the first day i heard something as gross as that


I'm patiently waiting for them though to come up with their googled deduction.

KingEbukaNaija:


Physicians are medical doctors and obviously have a great knowledge of biological science

Israelites had physicians

2 Chronicles 16:12-13
In the thirty-ninth year of his reign Asa became diseased in his feet. His disease was severe, yet even in his disease he did not seek the LORD, but the physicians. So Asa slept with his fathers, having died in the forty-first year of his reign.

Egyptians who were pagans had physicians
Genesis 50:2
Joseph commanded his servants the physicians to embalm his father. So the physicians embalmed Israel.

Physicians existed during the time of Jesus
Mark 2:17
And hearing this, Jesus said to them, "It is not those who are healthy who need a physician, but those who are sick; I did not come to call the righteous, but sinners."


Atheists sha ... you people know NOTHING

Maka Y! Why do you just talk anyhow without thinking.


Medical Doctors are not scientist - go get your fact right

4evergod2:



And where did you get the idea this was a contest? Yet you call us stupid?

Please don't inundate me with inanities - where did i said this was a contest?

check Ebuka' reply to my comment, you will see that he EVEN has more sense than you


Where you not the same guy that was unable to define "isolated" yesterday - i will take you serious, whenever you can.

4evergod2:



Why did you run away after I showed you evidence that Christians gave birth to science. You see where your hatred fo God and ignorance has landed you?

When i saw this comment, i was shocked! Run away from what? what evidence? - i used to think you a wise man not until today.


What evidence did you present? you are really clueless to think that science started in the C.E - i delibrately asked you to mentioned christian scientist that begat science in the B.C.E but all you could come up with is christian scientist of the C.E - guess you don't even know the meaning of B.C.E ( It stand for before common era)

Science has been in existence before jesus was born - all the scientist of the B.C.E were non-believers - i dare you (4evergods) or any jesus boi on this forum to prove me wrong


If you want list i will give you a 1001 scientist of the B.C.E that were non-believers


FYI: ATHEISM BEGET SCIENCE!

KingEbukaNaija:


99.9 percent of the people who subscribe to atheism are foolish and vacuous - fact .

That's the problem with you christians - you always believe err'one here gets angry over the comment directed at them.

FYI, i'm not annoyed, its just an online faceless forum, no one wins online

4evergod2:


Yet these same stupid people gave birth to science.

Everything intelligent just laughed at you now.

How did the stupid people gave birth to science? - kindly state the early scientist of the B.C.E

dalaman:


What are we to do with this pile of baseless assumptions please?

Atheism is something about intelligent people being full of doubt while religious folks are stupid people full of confidence without answers

Sirmuel1:





You dey talk like say Messi no win any trophy! 5 trophies in a season....runner up copa America!!!!

Like I wrote earlier, MESSI will be world's best again come 2017!!!! WHO WAN DIE, MAKE HE DIE oh!

Kkkkk

Sirmuel1:







January 2017, Lionel Messi go win Ballon d'or, who wan die, make he just die

It's better you wake up early from your dream and start living in reality.

messhite wont make the top 3 come 2017

Ronaldo will be crown while suarez will be the first runner up & Griezman will be the lastman standing

Sirmuel1:
Some players do the job and CR7 gets the glory, that's what hurt most!!!



Ronaldo is a good player, fine...but this tournament, there were other players that should be recognized...players like Nani, Pepe, Sanches...they performed better.




Anyway, January 2017, Messi will be given his 6th Ballon d'or. Who wan die, make he die

Lol.... No one is struggling with him for the prison d'Or - its all his

PigMeat:

hahahaha, sanchez to coach pogba? Damn! U went too hard on this one.

No, you got me wrong - i meant sanchez would have been a better signing over pogba but Mr Van Gaal ruined it

Anabel:


I was telling my friend the same thing. People keep saying it's just one game. Aside from group stage, I didn't see anything again. The he did that yeye leg trick assist against Germany and that was all. And he wants to be bought for 100mil and earn 300k per week? I need to restart my footballing career.

You once a player? a good one or...? what position do u play in?

Anabel:


Thank you my brother. God bless you. I said same thing o. Even tho I didn't mention Scholes, Deco, Modric, Beckham, Lampard and Gerrard. I mentioned the others and the person was givibg me stories about his age, him being suitable for English style of play, he's the best we have right now and all that. Juve dropped that price cos they don't wanna sell. He says we need money to attract players since we are not going UCL

Opinion varies from one person to another, we can't all love the same person - i used to like pogba before based on what i read about him online, my likeness for him diminished when i started watching him at juventus - he is just an ORDINARY average player.

Personally, i prefer veratti to pogba - he is more technical & skillful, matuidi is a better option too but pogba is a no-no, no hates though.

Anabel:


I was telling my friend the same thing. People keep saying it's just one game. Aside from group stage, I didn't see anything again. The he did that yeye leg trick assist against Germany and that was all. And he wants to be bought for 100mil and earn 300k per week? I need to restart my footballing career.

Pogba is a good footballer, no doubt about that, but pogba tag price is an insult to players like Xavi, Xabi, Iniesta, Scholes, Gerrard, Lampard, Pirlo, Beckham, Modric, Deco Etc - This players are 100miles ahead of pogba - thanks to the media, pogba would have been an ordinary average player.

PigMeat:

that one game wey him suppose prove himself?

Why didn't he played that one game with all his strength and skill to prove his price, at least err'one knew sissoko played spectacularly today in other not to go down with newcastle to the championship

ammyluv2002:
Seriously overrated

Sanchez would have been a better catch for Man Utd but Mr philosophy too daft to know that

PigMeat:

really? Na all this useless mods wey dey support messi ban u? 2nd ballon d'or loaded already. If naija pattern of election rigging no fit save am.




I cant have player like martial that single handedly took man utd to f.a cup victory in my team anf leave him on the bench. U saw what the likes of sanchez and williams were doing.

Nah, it was on religion section, got 3weeks to go - Sanchez is the best (young) player of the tournament - sanchez would have been a better catch over pogba, Bleep Mr philosophy wherever he is today

Oahray:
Lol. Are you serious? That guy has more trophies than all the teeth on your lower jaw.

The fact remains the same - he has never won any major international trophy for Argentina - that is the difference between him and RONALDO - Ronaldo is an inspirer, he always inspire his players while messi can't inspire a team

Pogba is overhyped and overrated - we don't need him in Man Utd

PigMeat:

are u beastambition? We are good football pundits, we know hoe things rolls.
The useless coach so far in the tournamet is the french coach. That award should be reserved for him and himself alone.
Lesson learnt: neglect martial at your own peril.

Yep. A barca fan Almost broke bottle on my head after Eder' Goal - Why Use Gignac Over Martial? The Coach Is Daft! 4th Ballon D'or Loading Though