Bobloco's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Bobloco's Profile › Bobloco's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 524 pages)
Tinubu Didn't Want To Work With Me When I Was His Deputy Gov, His Agenda Differed From That Of AD—Akerele Chief Kofoworola Bucknor-Akerele has spoken about why she resigned as deputy governor of Lagos State when Bola Tinubu was governor of the state In a video shared by Vanguard, Akerele said Tinubu did not want to work with her because they had different political goals and ideas Akerele stated that she did not support Tinubu’s agenda because it was different from that of the party that brought them to power. She said Tinubu wanted her to help him take control of the party, but she refused, and that caused disagreement between them In Akerele's words: "Bola Tinubu did not want to work with me at all because he had a different agenda to the agenda of what the AD, the party that put us in power, stood for at that time. What he wanted was somebody who would assist him in taking over the AD, and because I was not ready to do that we had our differences" https://news-af.feednews.com/news/detail/4899791dd7b456aeab9295cd3dcab9b6?client=news |
Buba Galadima, Secretary of the Board of Trustees of the New Nigeria People’s Party, NNPP, has called on Nigerians defend their votes in the 2027 elections with “bottles and jerry cans of kerosene”.https://www.vanguardngr.com/2026/05/defend-your-votes-with-kerosene-galadima-says-obi-kwankwaso-leave-adc-monday/Please
|
Obapluto:Tinubu will always praise those who grab it, snatch it and run away with it |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AXAxKULEst0 The General Overseer of the Redeemed Christian Church of God, Pastor Enoch Adeboye, has shared a personal and humorous anecdote about a “rapture scare” he experienced, using the story to warn couples against the danger of going to bed with unresolved conflicts.https://punchng.com/i-was-trembling-sweating-adeboye-recounts-night-he-thought-he-missed-rapture/
|
Mr Adeseun stated, “The only person by God’s grace who will fly our party’s flag in the 2027 election and win is Sharafadeen Alli.” Some prominent leaders of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Oyo State have endorsed the senator representing Oyo South senatorial district, Sharafadeen Alli, as the party’s preferred governoship candidate for the 2027 general elections. Mr Alli, who is seeking the APC governorship ticket, was endorsed on Friday, during a high-level leadership summit held in Samonda, Ibadan. The party leaders at the summit said the endorsement and consensus decision followed a similar pattern in Lagos and Ogun states, aimed at forging internal cohesion within the party. A former representative of Oyo Central in the Senate, Ayo Adeseun, said that the endorsement was preceded by wide consultations, including with President Bola Tinubu, who also prefers Mr Alli as the governorship candidate. The former lawmaker noted that he met with Mr Tinubu in Abuja, adding that the President’s preference holds a significant weight that should be respected by party members. “Mr President remains the leader of our party, and his opinion on who flies the party’s flag must be given due consideration. “When party members who want to do their aspiration declaration inform us, we often go there. But going forward, you won’t see me in such a gathering. The only person by God’s grace who will fly our party’s flag in the 2027 election and win is Sharafadeen Alli. Our president sent me on this endorsement errand,” the former lawmaker said. Similarly, an APC chieftain, Fatai Ibikunle, who also supported the consensus endorsement, called on other aspirants within the party to shelve their ambition and rally behind the consensus decision. He stressed that internal cohesion within the APC would determine the party’s victory in the forthcoming 2027 governorship race. “Before they called our brother Ayo Adeseun, the president called me, saying Fatai, you are my son in Oyo State, I prefer Chief Sharafadeen Alli and I will support him to victory,” Mr Ibikunle said. Other notable party leaders in attendance at the event were Akin Olajide, MKO Laoye, Akin Oke and Segun Odebummi, among many others. Reacting to his endorsement, Mr Alli thanked the party leaders for the trust reposed in him, promising to deliver an all-inclusive governance if given the chance to lead the state. He also thanked Mr Tinubu for his guidance and leadership oversight within the APC. https://gazettengr.com/oyo-apc-leaders-endorse-alli-as-consensus-governorship-candidate/ |
yarimo:Yarimo rest na Are you sure your life is not in disarray like this so |
A chieftain of the opposition African Democratic Congress, ADC, Nafiu Bala, has expressed deep regret over his alleged involvement in the internal crisis rocking the party, saying his life is now under threat. Speaking amid rising tension within the party, Bala claimed he never anticipated the level of fallout that followed the political disagreements, insisting that the situation has escalated beyond control. According to the Vanguard, he said, “I regret my role in the ADC crises. I did not know it would reach this level. My life is in danger”. The ADC has been grappling with internal divisions in recent times, with factions accusing one another of sabotage, leadership imposition, and anti party activities. While details surrounding the alleged threats remain unclear, Bala’s statement adds another layer of concern to the ongoing crisis within the party https://dailypost.ng/2026/05/02/i-regret-my-role-in-adc-crises-my-life-is-in-danger-nafiu-bala-cries-out/?utm_source=operamini&utm_medium=feednews&utm_campaign=operamini_feednews |
President Bola Ahmed Tinubu will depart Abuja on Saturday, May 2nd, on a visit to Kenya, Rwanda and France. President Tinubu’s first stop will be in France, after which he will depart for Nairobi, Kenya, to attend the Africa-France Summit scheduled to begin next week. Co-chaired by President Emmanuel Macron and President William Ruto, the summit focuses on energy transition, green industrialisation, digital transformation, restructuring of global financing architecture, and climate action. President Tinubu’s participation at the summit from May 11th to May 12th. will underscore Nigeria’s unwavering commitment to strengthening strategic partnerships with African nations and the French Republic. The summit, with the theme – “Africa Forward: Africa-France Partnerships for Innovation and Growth” – will provide a high-level platform for African leaders and their French counterparts to deliberate on critical issues affecting the continent, including economic transformation, climate resilience, infrastructure development, youth empowerment, technological advancement, and peace-building initiatives. At the end of the Kenyan summit, President Tinubu will depart for Kigali, Rwanda, to attend the annual Africa CEO Forum, taking place between May 14th and 15th. With the theme “Scale or Fail”, this year’s Africa CEO Forum will be the largest gathering of African private sector leaders, investors, and policymakers, focusing on accelerating economic transformation through shared scale, regional integration, and increased cross-border investment. Held in partnership with the International Finance Corporation (IFC), the summit brings together over 2,000 top executives and national leaders to debate strategies for building resilient, competitive industries. At the two summits, President Tinubu will deliver statements highlighting his administration’s ongoing reforms to reposition the nation as a prime destination for investment and growth. He will also hold high-level meetings with top-tier global and African business leaders. President Tinubu will be accompanied on the trip by some of his ministers and senior aides. He will return to Nigeria at the end of the Rwanda summit. Bayo Onanuga Special Adviser to the President (Information & Strategy https://statehouse.gov.ng/president-tinubu-to-embark-on-a-three-nation-trip/
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-S_YiPj_78 Watch Moment Wole Soyinka Mounts Okada After Ake Centre Visit
|
Tinubu splashing millions of dollars to lobby U.S. Congress, failing to address Christian genocide: Riley Moore Mr Moore was among a U.S. fact-finding delegation to Nigeria on alleged Christian genocide. U.S. lawmaker Riley Moore has lashed out at President Bola Tinubu’s government for splashing multi-million dollars to lobby the American Congress while failing to address the killing of Christians in Nigeria. Announcing the passage of the U.S. annual State Department funding bill in a post on X, Mr Moore said, “The Tinubu Administration is spending millions lobbying Congress while failing to adequately address the genocide Nigerian Christians face daily.” He added, “In my view, the Tinubu Administration has failed to live up to the conditions the appropriations committee placed on security assistance.” Mr Moore, who was among a U.S. fact-finding delegation to Nigeria on alleged Christian genocide in the most populous African country, said the bill is targeted at restricting “Security Assistance to Nigeria unless certain criteria are met.” Other criteria the Nigerian government must meet include: “effectively responding to violence and holding perpetrators accountable, prioritizing resources for internally displaced persons and actively returning displaced persons to their ancestral homelands. It requires @SecRubio to assess Abuja’s compliance with these standards.” According to Mr Moore, the law requires that any U.S. assistance prioritises atrocities prevention, advancing religious freedom, prosecuting Fulani ethnic militia groups, criminal gangs, and other jihadist terrorist groups. The bill also requires “accountability for police and security forces, delivery of humanitarian assistance, bolstering faith-based organizations’ response in areas impacted by violence and efforts to disarm Fulani ethnic militants.” While Bayo Onanuga, a spokesperson for Mr Tinubu was yet to respond to request for comments on Mr Moore’s criticism, another aide, Daniel Bwala, told the Gazette to “Reach out to the office of NSA for reaction.” Tinubu’s government has been under intense pressure from the U.S. government over alleged killing of Christians in the country. The campaign over alleged Christian genocide in Nigeria has led to President Donald Trump redesignating Nigeria a Country of Particular Concern late last year. Also, the American president ordered bombing of terrorists in their enclave in Sokoto State on December 25, 2025. On January 14, Peoples Gazette reported that Mr Tinubu’s administration splurged $9 million on a Republican lobbyist in its desperate effort to curry Washington’s favour, particularly to appease Mr Trump on plans to invade Nigeria to confront terrorists allegedly targeting Christians, thereby humiliating his government’s capacity ahead of his re-election bid next year https://gazettengr.com/tinubu-splashing-millions-of-dollars-to-lobby-u-s-congress-failing-to-address-christian-genocide-riley-moore/ |
"If Reelection Didn’t Work,I’ll Go To Classroom,If It's Doesn't Favour Me,I’ll Do Consultancy–Kefas Governor of Taraba State, Agbu Kefas, has stated that his political future, including any potential bid for a second term, will be determined by the will of the people rather than personal ambition or the desire to remain in power. Kefas made this position known while speaking with journalists in Lagos, where he addressed questions about his administration and growing speculation surrounding the next election cycle. His comments come at a time when conversations about re-election plans are beginning to surface among political leaders across the country. According to the governor, his approach to governance is rooted in accountability and service to the electorate. He emphasized that leadership should not be driven by self-interest, but by a commitment to meeting the needs and expectations of citizens. He noted that the experiences and opinions of the people of Taraba State would play a decisive role in shaping any decision he makes regarding a second term. Kefas explained that public feedback serves as an important measure of performance in a democratic system. He stressed that leaders must remain attentive to how their policies and actions affect the lives of ordinary citizens, and allow that feedback to guide their political decisions. Addressing concerns about electoral conduct, the governor also spoke strongly against political violence. He said he would neither support nor encourage any form of violence in pursuit of political office, stressing that elections must be conducted in a peaceful and orderly manner. He added that no political ambition should come at the cost of human lives or the stability of communities. His remarks reflect ongoing national concerns about electoral violence, which has occasionally accompanied political contests in different parts of the country. Kefas reiterated that the protection of lives and the preservation of peace must remain a priority in any democratic process. On his personal outlook, the governor indicated that he is prepared to accept the outcome of any election, regardless of the result. He stated that if the people of Taraba State are not satisfied with his performance, he would respect their decision and move on without resistance. He emphasized that political office is not permanent and that leaders should be willing to step aside when necessary. Kefas also spoke about his background and possible paths outside politics. He revealed that he has experience in the education sector and would be willing to return to teaching if circumstances require it. He added that he could also engage in consultancy or contribute to religious and community activities, including teaching Bible study. By outlining these alternatives, the governor highlighted his belief that public service extends beyond holding political office. He maintained that individuals can continue to contribute meaningfully to society in different capacities, regardless of their position. He further emphasized that democratic governance is built on the principle that power belongs to the people. According to him, leaders must remain accountable at all times and not only during election periods. He said that maintaining trust and stability requires continuous engagement with citizens and a genuine commitment to their welfare. https://news-af.feednews.com/news/detail/9059c3bd4c8ee96468dc57f9f019637c?client=news |
Student Loans or Long-Term Debt Trap?
|
The Chief Executive Officer of the Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise (CPPE), Dr. Muda Yusuf, has cautioned the Federal Government against a singular “fixation” on revenue targets, warning that an aggressive tax regime could stifle economic growth and exacerbate social inequality. Speaking on the Arise Morning Show, Dr. Yusuf addressed the growing public anxiety surrounding Nigeria’s recent fiscal policy measures, specifically the introduction of the “Green Tax” an Environmental Equity Tax on vehicles and the appointment of tax-focused specialists to top economic positions. The Risk of Financial Objective Dominance Dr. Yusuf noted that while the President and Finance Minister Taiwo Oyedele have consistently messaged a “tax prosperity, not poverty” approach, the reality on the ground often tells a different story. He warned that when accountants and tax specialists dominate economic coordination, “financial objectives” often take precedence over social and developmental goals. “When there is too much fixation on revenue targets, it hurts development, and sometimes it hurts welfare,” Dr. Yusuf stated. “If there is too much pressure on investors, it will be difficult for them to grow their business and create jobs.” The “Green Tax” and Middle-Class Inequity The most contentious point of the interview centered on the new 2% to 4% tax on vehicles with engine capacities above 2,000cc. While the government justifies this as a climate-friendly “Green Tax,” Dr. Yusuf argued that the 2,000cc threshold incorrectly classifies middle-class staples such as the Toyota Camry and Honda Accord as luxury or environmentally damaging items. He highlighted a major disconnect between the policy and Nigeria’s socio-economic reality: Mass Transit Gap: Nigeria lacks an effective mass transit system, making private vehicle ownership a necessity for the middle class rather than a luxury. Youth Employment: High taxes on “entry-level” used vehicles directly impact the gig economy, particularly youth who rely on Uber and Bolt for their livelihoods. Advertisement Climate Irony: Dr. Yusuf pointed out that while global climate change is a reality, Nigeria’s primary contributions are structural (such as gas flaring) rather than vehicular. “I worry about the tax on used cars. For an economy heavily dependent on road transportation, tariffs can reach around 60% when you add VAT and import charges. 2,000cc is not a luxury vehicle,” he noted. Structural Concessions and Global Context Despite his criticisms, Dr. Yusuf acknowledged that the government has provided significant concessions elsewhere. He noted that electric vehicles, mass transit buses, and essential manufacturing inputs under the “National List” have seen tax reductions or exemptions. He also highlighted that administrative penalties on gas flaring remain a primary tool for tackling Nigeria’s actual carbon footprint. However, he stressed that for a “Green Transition” to be coherent, the government must invest in the affordability of alternatives rather than simply increasing the cost of existing options. Leadership Stability and Political Economy Addressing the recent exit of high-ranking officials and the appointment of Taiwo Oyedele to lead fiscal reforms, Dr. Yusuf emphasized that the role of a Finance Minister in Nigeria is “50% technical and 50% political.” He expressed concern that a purely technical approach might struggle with the domestic political maneuvering required to sustain long-term reforms across the Governor’s Forum and the National Assembly. A Call for Transparent Spending In his concluding remarks, Dr. Yusuf echoed a widespread public sentiment: revenue generation is only half of the equation. He called for a dramatic increase in transparency regarding how collected taxes are utilized. “We need to do a lot more in terms of transparency and managing public finance at all levels of government. We must be mindful of the social objectives the welfare of the people. These are critical metrics for measuring the performance of any government,” he concluded https://dailytimesng.com/vehicle-tax-targets-wrong-class-says-cppe-chief/ |
You Cannot Be Judge In Your Own Case” — Nigerians Reject INEC’s Self-Conducted Forensic Probe That Cleared Chair Amupitan *Demand Independent Investigation Nigerians across the political spectrum have overwhelmingly rejected the Independent National Electoral Commission’s announcement that a forensic probe has cleared its Chairman, Professor Joash Amupitan SAN, of allegations relating to a partisan social media account with lawyers, activists, and ordinary citizens citing the fundamental legal principle of nemo judex in causa sua (no one should be judge in their own cause) and describing the self-conducted investigation as “ridiculous,” “farcical,” and a violation of basic principles of justice. The backlash expressed across X, Instagram, and other social media platforms has been near-universal, with Nigerians pointing out that INEC set up the investigation committee, INEC’s chairman authorised payment for it, INEC received the report, and INEC announced the findings making the commission simultaneously the accused, the investigator, the judge, and the announcer of its own acquittal. The reaction marks the latest and potentially most damaging chapter in the controversy that has engulfed the INEC chairman since the resurfacing of a “Victory is sure” social media post allegedly made under an APC-aligned tweet a controversy that has already drawn calls for resignation from former NHRC Chairman Chidi Odinkalu, demands for a National Assembly investigation from SERAP, and an inadvertent confirmation of the tweet’s authenticity from Senate President Godswill Akpabio. The most consistent legal objection raised by Nigerians centres on the ancient and universally recognised legal principle that no person or institution should be a judge in their own cause. “Nemo judex in causa sua this means, in law, INEC cannot be a judge in its own cause,” a legal commentator posting under the handle @Barristerstreet stated, adding that he had read the entire press release “to find out who authored the investigation, and all I can see are repeated references to ‘an independent forensic’ without identifying the investigators.” “INEC cannot be a judge in its own case and expect Nigerians to believe the outcome,” another user stated. [b]“You cannot be the judge, jury and executioner. This pseudo-democracy you guys are practising has become evident,” [/b]another wrote. “How can INEC be the judge over its own case? Una just dey play,” another stated in a mix of English and Pidgin that captured the exasperation felt by many. The legal principle one of the twin pillars of natural justice alongside the right to fair hearing applies not only to courts but to any investigative or quasi-judicial process where the outcome affects the rights, reputation, or status of the person being investigated. An institution investigating its own chairman and announcing that he has been cleared violates this principle regardless of what the investigation actually found. Meanwhile, a source told our correspondent that they have written to X, citing privacy concerns for not releasing the information, and noted that such details can only be disclosed upon a court order, as the platform holds the full records of the account in question. While, the most frequently asked question across social media was simple: who actually conducted the forensic investigation? “Who conducted the forensic probe, and what are the criteria used?” one user asked. “Forensic probe by who? Would a thief declare himself guilty?” another asked. “Which forensic probe? How did they come to the conclusion? Lies everywhere,” another stated. “We need independent forensic and not a fake one set up by the said INEC itself,” another demanded. “Chidubem.O” asked pointedly: “Who conducted the forensic in the first place?” The absence of clear, independently verifiable information about the identity of the forensic investigators, their terms of reference, their methodology, and their findings has deepened suspicion that the investigation was designed to produce a predetermined outcome rather than to establish the truth. Several Nigerians captured the absurdity of the situation in a single phrase. “The caption should have been ‘Amupitan clears Amupitan’ case closed!” one user wrote, encapsulating the public perception that the INEC chairman effectively investigated and acquitted himself. “INEC chairman set up a committee to investigate his alleged misconduct and he authorised payment for same and the report was submitted to him. What happens to the principle of law that you cannot sit as a judge over your own case? What happens to suspension from office pending investigation?” another user asked, raising the additional point that in any credible accountability framework, a person under investigation should step aside during the process rather than overseeing it. “APC via INEC probing themselves and also clearing themselves,” another observed with laughing emojis. “This APC flag bearer can never be a referee in a game he is also a player. The more you try to deny it, the more you complicate your issues. #AmupitanMustGo,” another wrote. Beyond the legal objections, Nigerians questioned the institutional competence of INEC to conduct forensic digital investigations in the first place. “This is funny. INEC did forensic of Amupitan’s tweet. When did INEC add forensic investigation to their job?” one user asked, highlighting that the commission’s mandate is to organise and conduct elections — not to conduct digital forensic investigations. The observation underscores the broader concern: INEC is an electoral body, not a forensic investigation agency. If the commission genuinely wanted to establish the truth about the social media account, the investigation should have been conducted by an independent forensic firm with no connection to INEC, or by a body with statutory investigative authority such as the National Assembly exercising its oversight powers. Dr. Bello Saleh, a PhD holder who had been commenting on the controversy, offered perhaps the most damning assessment. “This non-defence is ridiculous, farcical and shameful. And these are the lot we expect to deliver a free and fair election in 2027!” Saleh stated. He had earlier posted: “Refusing to remove a compromised INEC chairman sends one message: ‘The outcome matters more than the process.’ That’s not democracy. That’s choreography.” The “choreography” metaphor captured the growing public perception that INEC’s actions from the initial denial, to the self-investigation, to the self-clearance are not genuine accountability measures but rehearsed performances designed to maintain the status quo while creating the appearance of due process. Several Nigerians advised INEC that continued self-defence was making the situation worse rather than better. “Stop fooling yourselves APC! This is the digital age! When you are in a hole, stop digging! Just let Amupitan resign!” one user wrote. “I didn’t need to read it to know you will tweet another lie. Just look at what a commission that is supposed to be independent is doing. Even with all the available evidence, you chose to stand on business. Not like you had any reasonable credibility before, but this is the straw,” another stated. “INEC has been compromised. They shouldn’t waste their time in 2027. They can announce Tinubu as winner,” another wrote in a tone of bitter resignation. Underlying the outrage is a sense that the available evidence which linking the @joashamupitan account to Amupitan’s personal Yahoo email from his University of Jos CV, the rapid changes to the account (username change, locking, “Parody Account” relabelling) at the exact moment the controversy erupted, and Senate President Akpabio’s implicit confirmation that the tweet was genuine has not been adequately addressed by INEC’s self-conducted probe. “Una go explain tire, evidence dey,” one user stated simply meaning “you’ll get tired of explaining, the evidence exists.” The point is that the public evidence linking the account to Amupitan is detailed, specific, and verifiable while INEC’s forensic clearance is vague, self-directed, and lacking in publicly disclosed methodology or findings. Confidence in Every Move With Valetax Mobile Navigate the markets effortlessly with a clean interface, smart tools, and real-time updates designed to keep you one step ahead. Valetax by TaboolaSponsored Links The hashtags #AmupitanMustGo and #AmupitanMustResign continue to trend, with Nigerians maintaining that no amount of self-investigation can substitute for the kind of independent, transparent inquiry that SERAP has demanded from the National Assembly. The fundamental demand remains unchanged: either an independent body investigates the allegations and publishes its findings transparently, or Amupitan resigns to preserve whatever remains of INEC’s institutional credibility ahead of the 2027 elections. As one user summarised: “INEC cannot be the judge, jury and executioner in its own case. Nigerians reject this kangaroo forensic probe.” Tensions Keep Oil Volatile Trade the price swings with low spreads YWO by TaboolaSponsored Links The commission’s decision to investigate and clear its own chairman rather than submitting to independent scrutiny has not resolved the controversy. It has deepened it, confirming the very perception of institutional capture that the investigation was presumably meant to dispel. For an institution whose name begins with “Independent,” the inability to demonstrate independence in investigating its own chairman raises the question that now haunts every aspect of Nigeria’s electoral preparation: if INEC cannot be independent about its own chairman, how can it be independent about the elections? https://thenigerialawyer.com/you-cannot-be-judge-in-your-own-case-nigerians-reject-inecs-self-conducted-forensic-probe-that-cleared-chair-amupitan-cite-nemo-judex-in-causa-sua/ |
The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has said that President Bola Tinubu should be afraid of a major defeat in 2027 because he would be contesting against millions of Nigerians who have faced unprecedented hardship under his government. In a statement by the national publicity secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, the party made the remark in reaction to a statement by the president that he was not scared of the opposition, whom he mocked as holding its convention on the streets. The party described the remarks as unpresidential, saying with his utterances, the president appeared preoccupied with politics even as majority of Nigerians sink deeper into poverty and are left helpless in the hands of insurgents and kidnappers. Reacting to the president’s comments, the ADC said, “What Nigerians saw was not the confidence of a leader in control. It was the anxiety of a president increasingly disconnected from the reality of hardship, insecurity, and frustration facing millions of citizens. “At a time when families are battling a historic cost of living crisis, food inflation, rising debt burdens and collapsing purchasing power, the president chose to mock the opposition instead of addressing the suffering of Nigerians.” The ADC spokesman added that while the president spoke, reports of children being abducted from examination centres were circulating. “This is the reality of today’s Nigeria, insecurity spreading deeper into everyday life while government appears distracted,” the party said. Abdullahi cautioned the president against ridiculing the opposition, adding that he should be deeply concerned that the majority of Nigerians have rejected his government, whose ill-conceived policies have ruined lives and destroyed livelihoods. “These are the reasons he should be scared, because the people are determined to vote him out. “We also reject the false narrative around the ADC National Convention. We did not hold our convention on the street. If that was the story supplied to the President by agents of disruption, then he has been misinformed. “But even if any opposition party were forced to gather outside established venues, Nigerians would understand why. Under this administration, democratic space has shrunk significantly. “No government before now had denied political parties fair access to public venues such as Eagle Square, a national civic ground that belongs to all Nigerians, not to any ruling party,” he said. The ADC said President Tinubu also cannot preach separation of powers while simultaneously assuming the role of interpreter of the law, political referee, and commentator on judicial matters. He added that Tinubu cannot be a President and a judge at the same time. “If this administration truly respected separation of powers, Nigerians would not have witnessed the repeated weakening and humiliation of institutions meant to serve as checks and balances. The legislature, in particular, has too often appeared reduced to an extension of executive convenience.” The ADC further said it noted the President’s recent attempt to ingratiate himself with the supporters of late President Muhammadu Buhari after years of distancing himself from the late President and denigrating his record, blaming him for every failure of his government. The party described the move as hypocritical adding that the sudden U-turn is because of the coming election but that it is too late. “The issue before the country today is simple: hardship is rising, insecurity is worsening, debt is mounting, and hope is fading. No amount of political theatre can hide that truth. “The ADC remains focused on building a credible alternative anchored on competence, security, prosperity, and democratic freedom. Nigerians deserve better than excuses, propaganda, and power games,” he said. https://leadership.ng/you-should-be-scared-of-suffering-nigerians-adc-tells-tinubu/ |
The party said, “This is not balance. It is a dangerous failure of judgment and political accommodation taken too far.” The African Democratic Congress has faulted plans by President Bola Tinubu’s government to reintegrate hundreds of repentant terrorists into society. The ADC, in a statement by its spokesperson, Bolaji Abdullahi, on Sunday, described the development as troubling, alleging that the government did not understand the scale of security challenges in the country. “The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has taken note of reports that the Tinubu administration is proceeding with plans to reintegrate hundreds of so-called repentant terrorists into society. “Taken together with a pattern of official remarks over time describing such individuals as “brothers” and even “prodigal sons,” this decision points to a deeper and more troubling reality: a government that does not fully grasp the nature or scale of the threat it faces,” the coalition said. The government announced last Thursday that 744 former terrorists would be reintegrated following their graduation from the De-radicalisation, Rehabilitation and Reintegration Camp under Operation Safe Corridor. The Chief of Defence Staff, Olufemi Oluyede, who spoke at the event held in Gombe State, described the programme as a deliberate strategy to reduce violence, weaken extremist recruitment and promote long-term stability. However, the ADC berated the government for prioritising rehabilitation ahead of accountability, insisting “terrorism has taken lives, destroyed communities, displaced millions, and undermined the very foundation of security and economic stability in our country.” “What Nigerians are witnessing is not a coherent security strategy. It is, at best, confusion dressed up as policy; at worst, a dangerous policy of political appeasement that compounds the tragedy of victims of terror. “To respond to such a threat with language that softens its meaning, and policies that appear to prioritise rehabilitation ahead of accountability, is not compassion. It is weakness,” it explained. Accusing the government of failure to answer the most basic questions that any serious government must confront in a matter of this magnitude, the party alleged a lack of clarity on the systems that would monitor them after release, and no assurance that affected communities had been consulted or protected. According to the party, it is wrong for the government to claim to be waging war against terror while trying to reintegrate insurgents who destabilised the country for years. It stated, “On one hand, the government claims to be prosecuting a war against terror. On the other, it appears eager to reintroduce insurgents, who have waged a war against the Nigerian state, into society without first establishing clear processes for justice, without transparent standards for determining genuine repentance, and without credible safeguards to protect the communities they are being returned to. This is not balance. It is a dangerous failure of judgment and political accommodation taken too far.” The ADC insisted terrorism must be treated as an existential threat to the Nigerian state, charging the government on clarity, accountability and competence. “The ADC believes that terrorism must be treated as what it is: an existential threat to the Nigerian state. Our approach will be rooted in clarity, accountability, and competence. Those who have committed grave crimes will face the full weight of the law, because justice is not optional in a society governed by laws. “Nigeria cannot afford mixed signals in a fight that demands discipline and resolve. National security is not a guessing game, and it is not a space for sentiment to override judgment. It requires leadership that understands the stakes and is prepared to act with firmness and clarity,” the party added. https://gazettengr.com/adc-attacks-tinubu-govt-over-planned-reintegration-of-repentant-terrorists/ |
IMF Warning: Atiku Blasts Tinubu Administration Over ‘Organised Hardship Dressed As Economic Reform’ Reacting to the International Monetary Fund’s latest warning, Atiku, in a statement issued by his Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu, on Sunday, said the IMF had merely given official expression to what Nigerians already experience daily. Former Vice President of Nigeria and chieftain of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), Atiku Abubakar, has criticised the Tinubu administration, describing the current economic situation as “organised hardship dressed up as reform,” driven by what he called policy confusion, weak leadership, and detachment from the suffering of ordinary Nigerians. Reacting to the International Monetary Fund’s latest warning, Atiku, in a statement issued by his Senior Special Assistant on Public Communication, Phrank Shaibu, on Sunday, said the IMF had merely given official expression to what Nigerians already experience daily. “At a time when Nigerians were promised renewed hope, what they have received is renewed hardship—raw, relentless, and unforgiving,” Atiku said. “The IMF is not breaking news; it is confirming a national emergency that this administration refuses to acknowledge.” He said government officials continue to speak in polished economic language, while ordinary Nigerians face a far harsher reality—where wages have lost value, markets are filled with increasingly unaffordable goods, and survival has become a daily struggle. He added that despite fluctuations in global oil prices, many Nigerians are slipping deeper into poverty, weighed down by rising food costs, high transport fares, a volatile exchange rate, and a currency that continues to depreciate rapidly. “At the grassroots, the story is even more brutal,” he continued. “Parents are pulling children out of school because education is now a luxury. Farmers are abandoning their lands out of fear of violence. “Young people roam the streets, degrees in hand but hope in short supply. Small businesses are folding up like pack of cards under the weight of electricity tariffs, taxes, and a suffocating business climate.” He warned that what is unfolding is not just an economic downturn, but a full-blown erosion of human dignity. “This administration has turned sacrifice into a one-way street where the people bleed and the government lectures,” Atiku said. “You cannot ask a hungry people to be patient while policies choke the life out of them. That is not reform, that is punishment.” Atiku also expressed concern over Nigeria’s growing debt burden, warning that the country risked entering a cycle in which present economic hardship is being financed at the expense of future generations. “We are borrowing like there is no tomorrow, yet there is nothing to show today,” he said. “No jobs, no relief, no visible improvement in the lives of the people, only mounting debt and mounting pain.” He further criticised the administration’s obsession with abstract economic theories while ignoring the human cost. “Governance is not a classroom exercise,” he said. “It is about whether a pot boils in the kitchen, whether transport fare can be afforded, whether a small trader can restock, and whether a nation’s youth can dream again. Today, those simple things have become distant luxuries.” Calling for urgent action, Atiku urged the Federal Government to abandon what he described as “trial-and-error economics” and implement immediate, people-focused interventions to stabilise prices, revive small businesses, reduce the cost of transportation, and protect the most vulnerable. “This is not the time for speeches. It is the time for rescue,” he said. “Leadership must step down from its high horse and walk the dusty streets where Nigerians are struggling to breathe.” “The true test of leadership is simple: are the people better off or worse? Today, Nigerians are worse off—far worse off. And no amount of spin can hide that truth.” https://saharareporters.com/2026/04/19/imf-warning-atiku-blasts-tinubu-administration-over-organised-hardship-dressed-economic#google_vignette |
UK government justifies its officials attending ADC national convention as part of standard diplomatic practice UK supports Nigeria's democratic processes through engagement with political and civic stakeholders British High Commission emphasizes commitment to credible and peaceful elections in Nigeriahttps://www.legit.ng/politics/1705803-2027-elections-attended-adc-national-convention-uk-govt-explains/
|
All Our Presidents Used Mercedes Benz S-Class,This Is FirstTime President Is Using“The Beast”-Melaye Former Kogi West Senator, Dino Melaye, has criticized the use of a heavily armored presidential limousine popularly known as “The Beast,” arguing that it represents a break from long-standing tradition and raises questions about government spending. Melaye made the comments during an interview on Mic On Podcast hosted by Seun Akinbaloye, where he discussed what he described as changing patterns in presidential protocol and expenditure in Nigeria. The former lawmaker claimed that successive Nigerian leaders, from the early years of independence to recent administrations, traditionally relied on Mercedes-Benz S-Class vehicles for official duties, rather than the high-end armored vehicle currently in use. “Since Tafawa Balewa, Aguiyi Ironsi, Azikiwe, down the line to Muhammadu Buhari all our presidents, heads of States used Mercedes Benz S Class as their official car. This is the first time a president is coming and using a Beast. The same type being used by the American president costing over 9 times what S-Class should have cost us,” Melaye said. He argued that the shift to the armored limousine signals a significant change in how presidential security and mobility are handled, and questioned whether the financial implications are justified given Nigeria’s current economic challenges. Melaye suggested that the cost difference between the traditionally used vehicle and the armored “Beast” raises broader concerns about fiscal priorities and public accountability https://news-af.feednews.com/news/detail/a71eb89c5f7fe9abb5ef8e85cfa33180?client=news |
If APC diverted LG, pensioners’ funds, I can’t – Adeleke; ‘this is blackmail,’ party kicks Osun State Governor Ademola Adeleke and the opposition All Progressives Congress, APC, in the State have disagreed over reasons local government council staff were not getting paid at the council.https://www.vanguardngr.com/2026/04/if-apc-diverted-lg-pensioners-funds-i-l-cant-adeleke-this-is-blackmail-party-kicks/#google_vignette
|
…Petitions Foreign Embassies, World Bank, EU, DFID, Others The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has escalated the call for the resignation of the chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Prof Joash Amupitan to the Commission’s foreign development partners. The foreign development partners provide funding and technical assistance for certain critical operations of the Nigerian electoral body in pre and post election periods. Such assistance includes plugging budgetary shortfalls, or for urgent unanticipated needs where no budgetary outlays have been made by the Commission. Primarily, the assistance is usually rendered through co-sponsoring of programmes, to augment INEC’s statutory allocation. INEC has over the years, leveraged the interventions of the development partners at every election cycle to aid it in conducting free, fair and credible polls. The areas of assistance include engaging consultants who advise the Commission on voter registration, voter education, media work, transmission of results and election management. It also includes support for training of regular and as hoc staff, workshops and experience sharing. These interventions are geared towards strengthening of institutions and diffusion of democratic principles within a framework of mutual respect, harmony and co-responsibility. INEC’s key foreign development partners that the ADC is reaching out to include the United States Embassy, the British High Commission, the Canadian High Commission, the Japanese Embassy and South Korean Embassy. Others include the Joint Donor Basket Fund/UNDP, the Commonwealth Secretariat, London, the World Bank, Department for International Development (DFID), the European Union (EU) and the European Centre for Electoral Support (ECES). Also in collaboration with INEC are the African Union Commission (AUC), Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), Association of African Election Authorities (AAEA), the Institute for African Renaissance Studies (UNISA), and the Electoral Institute for Sustainable Democracy in Africa (EISA). Similarly, the Ford Foundation, the Mac Arthur Foundation, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung (FES), International Foundation for Electoral System (IFES), International Republic Institute (IRI), International IDEA, Westminster Foundation for Democracy, and DAI Global Belgium SRL also provide support for INEC. Investigation by THE WHISTLER revealed that the leadership of the ADC is seeking the intervention of the development partners to prevail on Amupitan to resign. The party and other opposition groups have been calling for the chairman’s resignation, accusing him of partisanship and bias towards the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC). The ADC National Publicity Secretary, Mallam Bolaji Abdullahi, confirmed THE WHISTLER‘s report in a telephone interview with our correspondent on Thursday. “Yes, I am confirming to you that we have been contacting INEC’s foreign funders and we are still contacting many of them. “Of course we are reaching out to them to let them know that INEC is gradually becoming a rogue organisation,” Abdullahi told our correspondent on the telephone. The ADC spokesman restated the party’s position that the electoral body under Amupitan cannot be trusted to conduct free, fair and credible elections. The opposition party hinged the call for the chairman’s resignation on what it described as his deliberate misinterpretation of an order of the Court of Appeal directing parties in the ADC leadership dispute to maintain the “status quo ante bellum.” The order arose from a suit filed at the Federal High Court in Abuja, by a former ADC Deputy National Chairman, Nafiu Bala Gombe challenging the legitimacy of Senator David Mark’s position as the party’s National Chairman. Gombe had prayed the lower court to restrain Mark and his team from parading themselves as leaders of the party, and declare him as the national chairman instead, a request the court turned down. Mark had approached the appellate court, seeking an order to quash Gombe’s request. The Appeal Court had declined the order, directing both parties to return to the lower court for the hearing and to maintain the status quo ante bellum. The INEC leadership had gone ahead to delist the Mark-led ADC leadership from its records, citing the order of the Court of Appeal, a development that triggered the call for Prof Amupitan’s resignation. Amupitan got into more trouble when critics exhumed his 2023 post on his X handle, depicting him as a passive supporter of the APC during the 2023 presidential election. Prof Amupitan had tweeted, “Victory is sure,” in response to a tweet by an APC member who was announcing the imminent victory of Asiwaju Bola Tinubu, who was the APC candidate in the 2023 presidential election. The post is widely perceived to be partisan, with critics branding the INEC chair as a supporter of the APC. Attempts by Prof Amupitan to disown the post by changing his username on X, were countered by critics who unveiled his digital trail on X records. The trail confirmed the INEC chairman’s e-mail address, his mobile telephone number and other information he provided in his bio column at the time he joined the X platform. Seamless & Secure Mobile Trading A few taps is all it takes to bring order, ease, and confidence back into your day. Click to experience the shift. Valetax by TaboolaSponsored Links With the revelation, members of the public have since been transferring money to his account, which he registered with his mobile telephone number with a digital payment platform, OPAY. The amounts being transferred to his OPAY account range between N1 and N10. Most of the payment receipts to Amupitan’s account, which are being circulated on the social media, showed the senders wrote “Resign Now” in the transfer narration column https://thewhistler.ng/exclusive-adc-escalates-call-for-amupitans-resignation-to-inecs-development-partners/amp/ |
A fresh political skirmish has broken out between the camp of former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and the Presidency, after a senior aide to President Bola Tinubu suggested that the incumbent “must complete eight years” in office before power returns to the North.https://www.vanguardngr.com/2026/04/second-term-not-tinubus-birthright-atikus-camp-blasts-onanuga/ |
As preparations for the 2027 polls intensify, chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Professor Joash Amupitan, seems to be nearing his limit. He is entangled in a series of relentless calls for his resignation amid allegations of perceived bias, which gained momentum after a tweet supposedly from him emerged. How he manages to navigate this ongoing challenge remains to be seen. I do not envy Amupitan, nor do I pity him. The way the Professor of Law and Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) has become entangled in this controversy highlights one of the many frustrations of holding public office in Nigeria, especially when the role is as sensitive as chairing the election management body. But make no mistake. Amupitan has nobody but himself to blame. He is responsible for his own misfortune. The fact that he agreed to serve as INEC chairman, knowing full well that he had publicly aligned with the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) is something I still cannot understand. Was he thinking Nigerians wouldn’t raise eyebrows? It is clear that the new INEC boss has his hand in the cookie jar. Tweets from an account linked to him exposed his sympathy for the ruling APC. The denials, rebuttals, refutations, and attempts to distance him from the tweet have failed. There are unmistakable digital footprints indicating that the tweet was from the University of Jos law professor. What this implies, and why Nigerians are calling for his resignation, is that the integrity of the 2027 elections is already being questioned months before the polls. Can Nigerians trust the results Professor Amupitan will declare at the end of the polls? Will he remain impartial against the ruling APC, especially given that he previously tweeted that victory is certain for the APC in response to a pro-APC post? In discussing Prof Amupitan’s continued stay as INEC chair, Nigerians are worried about two issues: the posting of a pro-APC tweet and the attempt to conceal it by changing the X handle to present it as a parody account. Both raise serious doubts about his ability to oversee a credible election and have fueled renewed calls for his resignation. Is Amupitan the owner of the account that tweeted “victory is sure,” clearly in support of the APC? Was that the same account that was hurriedly turned into a parody account to mislead Nigerians? If the answers are affirmative, he does not deserve to remain in office as INEC chair. He cannot be trusted to conduct a credible poll. It is hard to believe that a man who, just three years ago, behaved in a way that suggested support for a political party perceived as consistently trying to weaken opposition forces and entrench itself, can now be trusted to conduct a credible poll. One of the most jejune excuses and attempts to deodorise Amupitan’s tweet came from Senate President Godswill Akpabio. He said the INEC chairman merely said victory is sure. “He didn’t say victory is sure for APC. He didn’t say victory is sure for PDP. He just says victory is sure,” Akpabio, in his usual peak of buffoonery, said while speaking during the commissioning of the Nigeria Revenue Service building. But what Senate president conveniently overlooked was that Amupitan was replying to a tweet by an APC member, assuring him that an APC victory was guaranteed. The original tweet celebrated the APC’s success in an Igbo-dominated area, one where even the tweeter admitted had been challenging for the party to win. A curious juxtaposition of Amupitan’s tweet and INEC’s decision to derecognise the ADC leadership further deepens doubts about the electoral body’s commitment to fairness, which is an essential ingredient for a credible poll. INEC claimed it was acting on a court directive that the status quo ante bellum be maintained. There is a link. An INEC chairman who seems supportive of the ruling party takes steps to derecognise the leadership of a coalition of opposition parties, ready to challenge the ruling party, hiding under a court order for which he should have sought interpretation. If this is not a warning sign for a country heading towards a contested election, then nothing else is. To that extent, the call for Amupitan to resign demonstrates genuine patriotism. However, the calls for his resignation have also highlighted the need to review the process for appointing the INEC chairman. Why should a president, who belongs to a political party with a vested interest in an election, be solely responsible for appointing the chairman of the nation’s electoral umpire? Advertisement Credible elections in Nigeria still seem like a distant dream, even when the country had INEC chairmen who were not directly affiliated with the ruling party. Now that we have one who is widely perceived by opposition members as aligned with the ruling party, can anything positive emerge from the electoral process? Nigeria’s journey to credible elections has been long and challenging. Since 1999, the number of litigations at election petition tribunals has continued to increase after each electoral cycle, a sign that the process remains flawed. Advertisement Elections in Nigeria are often rigged, and the electoral body is frequently complicit. This partly explains why many Nigerians have lost confidence in the system. Ultimately, the method of appointing an INEC chairman plays a critical role in the integrity of the electoral process. There is a fundamental flaw in the current approach. The constitution clearly gives the president the power to appoint, subject to parliamentary approval. In effect, it allows partisan actors—the president and the parliamentarians—to appoint those who will oversee elections in which they or their party have a direct stake. Advertisement In fairness to the framers of the constitution, section 14(2a) of the Third Schedule to the 1999 Nigerian Constitution, as amended, provides for political neutrality and states, inter alia: “a member of the Independent National Electoral Commission shall be non-partisan and a person of unquestionable integrity.” However, like many things in Nigeria, this provision is more often breached than observed. There have been several instances of members of the ruling party being appointed as resident electoral commissioners and assigned to oversee elections in different states. That is a credible election sacrificed on the altar of partisanship. Advertisement What is clear is that the process lacks transparency. It weakens INEC’s credibility and compromises its impartiality. That is unacceptable in any democratic society. The controversy surrounding Professor Amupitan shows that the country may be heading towards yet another round of flawed and highly contested elections that will end up in court. How much more will Nigeria spend on another exercise that may prove just as disappointing? Prof Amupitan now faces a dire dilemma: resign honourably or remain as INEC chairman and oversee an election that many, especially within the opposition coalition, have already lost faith in. Whatever choice he makes, history will judge him. But Nigeria must endure and emerge stronger for future generations. https://www.thecable.ng/amupitan-should-just-leave/#google_vignette |
JuanDeDios:Both They were part of the APC and part of the convention |
APC Tolerating, Accommodating Wike Because Of Existing Pact — Yilwadtahttps://independent.ng/apc-tolerating-accommodating-wike-because-of-existing-pact-yilwadta/
|
There are palpable fears that some miscreants, who sneaked into Abuja, using the cover of recent political party conventions, may pose security challenges in the nation’s capital.https://thesun.ng/panic-in-fct-as-miscreants-refuse-to-leave-after-party-conventions/
|
owobokiri:And also loot the borrowings |
The Renewed Hope Agenda is obviously a scam. Even Bola Ahmed Tinubu himself knows he scammed Nigerians |
A simple question keeps resurfacing: why aren’t supporters of Tinubu defending his administration with results? Where are the claims of reduced poverty, lower prices, improved living standards, stable electricity, or better security? In most cases, governments are judged, and defended by measurable outcomes. But instead of pointing to clear improvements, much of the praise centers on political expansion, especially the growing number of governors aligning with the ruling party. That shift in focus is telling. When performance is strong, it speaks for itself. When it isn’t, power becomes the talking point. Even more striking is the rhetoric from within the administration itself. Individuals like Festus Keyamo, a minister, are not widely heard highlighting concrete achievements in their sectors, such as progress in aviation but are instead associated with praising Tinubu as a “criminal master strategist.” this only reinforces the perception that the emphasis is less on governance outcomes and more on political maneuvering and dominance. For many Nigerians facing rising costs, economic strain, worsening insecurity and electricity blackout, political dominance offers little comfort. Citizens do not live in party structures, they live in real conditions shaped by policy outcomes. Until there are visible improvements in everyday life, the emphasis on political control risks sounding less like confidence and more like a distraction. In the end, power is not the achievement, performance is. |
BAT Isn't GEJ Even If You Dress Monkey In Suit Or Pig In Agbada It'll Still Remain Monkey Or Pig—Ibe In a recent statement via his official X account, Paul Ibe, spokesman to former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, has compared the personality of President Bola Tinubu and former President Goodluck Jonathan. "You are damn right, @OgbeniDipo, BAT is not GEJ and vice versa! Even if you dress a monkey in a 3-piece suit, or a pig in a 3-piece agbada, it will still remain a monkey, or a pig. GEJ was born 20 November, 1957 (68) in Ogbia, Bayelsa State. His parents were Eunice Jonathan and Lawrence Jonathan while his siblings are Meni Jonathan and Nancy Jonathan-Olei. He is not a drug lord, has not forfeited any money linked to narcotics to the US and there's no controversy about his background, parentage and schools he attended. He attended UNIPORT, where he bagged a PhD, and is from Otuoke in Bayelsa State. In fact, he is a classmate to my elder cousin. Tinubu is truly not (and can never be) Jonathan. QED,"Source In his post, Ibe was reacting to statements by public affairs analyst Dipo Awoyide, who had argued that Tinubu and Jonathan should not be viewed in the same light, Ibe supported that position, insisting that the two leaders have different personal histories and public records. He went further to defend Jonathan’s background, highlighting his upbringing and academic journey, Ibe noted that the former president rose through the ranks without controversies surrounding his identity or education and described Jonathan as someone whose personal history is widely known and documented. The Atiku spokesman contrasted this with his criticism of President Tinubu, suggesting that the current administration does not reflect the same standards and argued that leadership should be built on transparency and credibility, adding that Nigerians deserve clarity about those in power. Ibe stressed that citizens must remain engaged in political discussions and hold leaders responsible for their actions, according to him, open debate is essential for a healthy democracy. He noted that comparisons between past and present leaders are necessary, especially as the country approaches another election cycle.
|
Dohn:Commentator said that the man is drinking arsenal tears🤣🤣🤣🤣 |
Former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar has condemned the reported airstrike by the Nigerian Air Force (NAF) on a market along the Borno–Yobe border, describing the incident as a “devastating failure” that demands urgent accountability.https://www.vanguardngr.com/2026/04/jilli-airstrike-a-devastating-failure-atiku-condemns-bombing-of-traders/ |