₦airaland Forum

Why Senate is scared of e-transmission of election results – Yiaga Africa boss, Itodo


Executive Director of Yiaga Africa, Samson Itodo has revealed real reasons political class is scared of the e-transmission of election results.

Speaking during an interview on ‘Sunday Politics’, a programme on Channels Television, Itodo said they are scared because of the power the electronic transmission of results has.

DAILY POST reports that the Senate on Wednesday reportedly turned down a proposed change to Clause 60, sub-section 3 of the Electoral Amendment Bill that sought to make electronic transmission of election results compulsory.

“What you do about those vulnerabilities is that you institute mechanisms that limit the extent of vulnerability, so you prevent any form of attack, because there is no system in the world that is insulated from penetration.

“So let’s get that clear. But in this particular instance, what the political class seem to be scared of is the power that electronic transmission of results has.

“What does it do? It enhances the transparency of the process. It also ensures it has a deterrent effect, because at the lowest and perhaps the weakest link of our entire results management process is at the collation level. That is where results are manipulated.

“And what INEC did by introducing electronic transmission, whether it’s iReV, is the fact that after voting at the polling unit, you collate the results, enter the results sheets, and then upload it on a portal defined by INEC.

“That way it enhances accessibility, so that when it goes to the coalition centre, everyone already sees the result,” he said.

The strike by the Joint Health Sector Unions (JOHESU) left patients stranded and government hospitals struggling, with many facilities offering only skeletal services for 84 days.

From locked record offices to partially operating laboratories and pharmacies, the impact was felt nationwide as health workers demanded better welfare, improved working conditions, and the full implementation of long-standing agreements.

In Abuja, patients bore the brunt of the industrial action. Those with health insurance were forced to pay out of pocket because the record officers did not attend to them. Some patients were also asked to buy consumables such as syringes and gloves from private pharmacies, while others were referred to private laboratories for basic diagnostic tests.

A resident of Nyanya, Mary Ogbona, narrated her ordeal after a domestic accident.

She said she was first rushed to Nyanya General Hospital, which referred her to Asokoro General Hospital. Although Asokoro is her designated facility under the health insurance scheme, she said they were told to buy all required consumables from outside because pharmacists were on strike.

According to her, “Thank God a pharmaceutical office in Asokoro was still open. We bought everything there, and it cost us over N50,000. But despite buying those items, I was not attended to. Instead, they referred me to Wuse Hospital.


“When we got to Wuse, they couldn’t attend to us because we needed to buy some things. They were suggesting that we proceed to the National Hospital or the University of Abuja Teaching Hospital, Gwagwalada, all because of the JOHESU strike.”

Another Abuja resident, Rosemary Abah, also shared her experience. Her daughter was about to resume school and complained of stomach pain, prompting her husband to take her for a medical check-up.

However, they were directed to a popular pharmaceutical shop for a malaria test, which cost N15,000, even though they had health insurance coverage at a government hospital. “All the tests recommended were about N80,000,” she said.

At the National Hospital in Abuja, relatives of patients also expressed concern. Victory Odinaka, whose sister was in the ICU, said the strike affected them in several ways.

“Doctors are in the ICU because they are not on strike, but we, relatives of patients, have to assist them with tasks normally handled by other health workers who are currently on strike. It’s unprofessional, but that’s the situation. For lab tests, we have to go outside, although a few tests can still be done here,” he said.

Another patient relative who was referred from a hospital in Keffi, Lawrence Ikeh, said the National Hospital had been doing its best despite the strike.

“We hardly feel the strike here because the management is really putting in effort. However, we were asked to go outside for an MRI because the hospital’s machine is faulty, even though we initially paid for a CT scan that the consultant later changed to an MRI. We still buy drugs here because the pharmacy is open, except for items they don’t have,” he explained.

The spokesperson of the National Hospital, Maajama Adamu, acknowledged that the strike disrupted operations. “Definitely, strikes anywhere disrupt activities, but our comparative advantage is that, in addition to management staff members that do not go on strike, we have a large number of interns undergoing training.

“That is our saving grace. It doesn’t mean the strike isn’t affecting us, but the interns have helped greatly in salvaging the situation,” he said.

JOHESU, which represents non-physician health workers such as laboratory scientists, pharmacists, and other allied professionals, began its nationwide strike on 14 November 2025.

The strike was called off on Friday evening.

LEADERSHIP Sunday reports that the Federal Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, in a circular dated 8 January 2026, directed all Chief Medical Directors (CMDs) and Medical Directors (MDs) of federal hospitals to enforce the “no work, no pay” rule on JOHESU members beginning January 2026.

The circular, signed by the Director of Hospital Services, Dr Abisola Adegoke, on behalf of the Coordinating Minister, also instructed facility heads to employ “all legal means,” including the use of locum staff, to forestall service disruptions in critical units such as accident and emergency, labour wards, and intensive care units.



Situation of Health Workers’ Strike In Rivers

The strike at the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital (UPTH) forced relatives to transfer patients to other health facilities within Port Harcourt, especially the Rivers State University Teaching Hospital (RSUTH).

A visit to the UPTH showed that most of the hospital beds were empty, as patients in critical condition had been transferred to other hospitals.

Speaking with LEADERSHIP Sunday, an inpatient, Mr Nduka John, said he was advised by his children to come to the hospital from his home because his condition had become a bit stable before the commencement of the strike.

Another patient, who requested anonymity, said she chose to remain in the hospital ward because she had no money to transfer to another hospital like other patients.

She, however, said her condition was improving despite the absence of the health workers, as the hospital management had been doing its best to care for her.

UPTH’s chairman of the medical advisory committee, Professor Datonye Alasia, said the hospital has since implemented its strike response protocols to mitigate the impact of the health workers’ action.

Alasia said, “We have a strike response protocol that we implement when any group of workers is on strike. Those protocols have been implemented to mitigate the impact while we anticipate a quick resolution.”



Strike Cripples Services at FMC Yenagoa

The health workers’ strike took a serious toll on healthcare delivery in Bayelsa State, with services at the Federal Medical Centre (FMC) Yenagoa operating far below capacity.

A visit to the hospital found it unusually quiet, with many departments shut and patients left waiting for hours without attention.

Several buildings within the hospital were locked, and only a handful of staff members were seen on duty.

Corridors that are usually filled with patients and relatives were largely deserted, while a few patients wandered around wards hoping to be attended to.

Some patients said they arrived as early as 8 a.m. but had yet to see a doctor. Others with scheduled appointments said they were unsure whether they would receive care, as many services appeared to be suspended.

At the Male Surgical Ward, activities had slowed almost to a halt. A nurse on duty confirmed that admissions had stopped days before the strike began.

“You can see that the patients are not here. Some of the patients who are here were discharged before the strike. In this ward, we have only one patient.”

A medical doctor at the hospital, Dr Asala, whose first name was not disclosed, said they were still working but could not offer full services because several key departments were on strike.

According to him, the absence of laboratory workers, pharmacists, theatre workers, and cleaners made effective treatment difficult.

“Doctors are not on strike; it is the other departments that are on strike at the moment. So the hospital is not functioning optimally… We attend to emergencies only. The hospital is open, but you won’t get the maximum care,” he said.

The Public Relations Officer at the Federal Medical Centre, Yenagoa, Mr Bernard Akpedi, also acknowledged the impact of the strike, noting that FMC Yenagoa is the only federal tertiary health facility in Bayelsa and serves as the state’s main referral centre.

“It’s unfortunate that as a management here, we are not happy about it. When a strike occurs like this, it really affects us negatively,” he said.

The Chairman of JOHESU/AHPN at FMC Yenagoa, Comrade Celestine Onoyina, said the union had waited long enough and accused the Federal Government of failing to honour agreements reached after years of negotiations.



In Delta, the strike forced patients to seek care elsewhere

The strike in Delta state forced many patients to seek care in private facilities.

Visits to Federal Medical Center, (FMC), Asaba, by our correspondent showed deserted wards and outpatient clinics, with only consultants, house officers, and nurses attending to patients.

At the center, a few nurses and medical staff were observed providing skeletal services to patients upon admission.

The strike left relatives of patients on admission and those in the Outpatients Department to look for alternative means of caring for their loved ones.

At the Federal Medical Center, Asaba, patients and their relatives at the hospital expressed frustration and lamented what they described as an “unbearable strike action” embarked upon by health workers

The Chief Medical Director, Dr Victor Osiatuma, said new patients were usually admitted under the care of specific consultants, who he said were expected to take full responsibility for such patients.

“With the strike, the center can admit new patients under consultants. Our General Outpatients’ Unit is also open for services,” Dr Osiatuma added.

However, normal medical services continued at the Delta State-owned Asaba Specialist Hospital (ASH), with little or no impact from the strike.

Delta State Commissioner for Health, Dr Joseph Onojaeme, said the strike ‘‘does not reflect the situation in Delta state as it remains the only state in the country with over 60 functional, government-owned hospitals.’’

He said state-owned hospitals had been granted full autonomy to retain and utilise 100 per cent of their internally generated revenue, enabling them to promptly procure drugs, maintain equipment, and respond more efficiently to patients’ needs.

Enugu state-owned hospital working

In Enugu, while the recent health strike affected federal hospitals in the state, the state-owned health facilities remained largely operational.

Laboratories, pharmacies and radiology units in the federal health facilities were either shut down or providing skeletal services, but state-owned facilities provided alternatives during the industrial action.

A medical doctor, Dr Okechukwu Amadi, said that though the strike affected federal health facilities, people in the state did not feel the impact too much because state health facilities were providing services.

“I can tell you that many people in Enugu state did not feel the impact of the strike as patients who could not be attended to in the federal hospitals got treatment in the state-owned hospitals,” he stated.

Health workers worked in Kebbi

There was no sign of a strike in Kebbi State, as health workers were seen working at the Sir Yahaya Memorial Hospital and the Federal University Teaching Hospital in Birnin Kebbi when our correspondent visited.

A patient in a sick bed said he had been admitted to Sir Yahaya Hospital three days ago. He said there was no day when he was not attended to by the hospital’s medical officers.

Also at the Federal Teaching Hospital, Birnin Kebbi, a female patient who was delivered of a baby two days earlier confirmed to LEADERSHIP Sunday that she was being attended to by the health workers.



In Imo, health workers observed strike

The health workers’ strike adversely impacted the health delivery system in Imo State. This resulted in public hospitals operating at low capacity, with critical services such as pharmacies, laboratories, and administrative departments brought to a halt.

When our Correspondent visited the General Hospital, Owerri, it was noticed that patients were being turned back.

A patient, Uzoma Ibe, stressed that the hospital tried its best to accommodate the patients. He, however, highlighted that some patients were turned back due to a lack of enough workers as a result of the strike action.

He said that some were forced to seek care at expensive private hospitals.

At the University Teaching Hospital, Orlu, patients and their family members also faced similar challenges in accessing medical attention.

The hospital’s pharmacy and laboratory services are limited, and patients are being forced to seek care at another hospital.

The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has asked the national assembly to reverse the senate’s position on the Electoral Act amendment bill and include a provision making the electronic transmission of election results mandatory.

In a statement on Saturday, the national executive council (NEC) of the NBA said it adopted this position after considering a report presented by Afam Osigwe, president of the association, at its February 5 meeting in Maiduguri, Borno state.

The NBA’s stance comes amid intense public debate over the senate’s handling of the Electoral Act amendment bill.

On Wednesday, the senate retained the provision for electronic transfer of election results as contained in the Electoral Act 2022.

During the consideration of the bill, the red chamber also rejected proposals for real-time results transmission and a 10-year ban on vote buyers, opting instead to maintain existing sanctions of fines or jail terms.

However, some members of the upper chamber have clarified that the bill enjoyed the backing of the majority in the senate.

Despite that widespread backing, the senate did not adopt the real-time transmission of election results sought by some advocates; instead, it retained the existing wording from the 2022 Electoral Act, under which results are to be transferred “in a manner as prescribed by the commission”.


In its report, NBA warned that such discretionary phrasing weakens the legal basis for transparent, real-time result reporting, leaving space for manipulation and post-election disputes.

The association said a clear statutory requirement for electronic transmission is essential to protect the integrity of votes and restore public confidence in Nigeria’s electoral system.

It also noted that credible elections remain the foundation of constitutional democracy and warned that continued resistance to enforceable electronic transmission provisions undermines democratic accountability.

The association said technology-driven transparency is no longer optional in modern democracies, urging Nigeria to align its electoral framework with global best practices.


Accordingly, the NBA called on members of the national assembly to demonstrate legislative responsibility by voting in favour of the amendment compelling the electronic transmission of election results.

“The council resolved that the national assembly must urgently revisit clause 60(3) and pass the proposed amendment to expressly mandate electronic transmission of results from polling units,” the statement reads

aswani:
To clarify before I respond, I am not a "Tinubu supporter".

Ordinary glitch that Yakubu said happened to IREV, Obidients nearly killed us neutrals here.

Until cloud providers can guarantee 100% uptime, anything but an electronic back up repository of election results is the furthest we should go technologically.

The human in the middle factor must be present and must be part of the primary source of truth of any election.

We haven't perfected IREV, yet you want to put technology deeper into more sensitive parts of the process, who does that?

Obidients need to rest on this matter, there is no basis for this being allowed to happen now. You people are just looking for excuses to disturb the rest of us when you lose again.

Obi’s claims over senate’s rejection of e-transmission of results misleading – Lagos APC


The Lagos State Chapter of the All Progressives Congress, APC has described the claims by the Presidential Candidate of Labour Party in the 2023 general elections, Peter Obi over rejection of electronic transmission of election results by the Senate as “false and misleading.”

Spokesman of the party, Seye Oladejo, made the remark on Saturday, in apparent reaction to Obi’s claim over the passage of Electoral Act and rejection of e-transmission of results.

Oladejo maintained that contrary to Obi’s claims, the Senate did not at any point oppose electronic transmission of results, rather, it acted “responsibly” by strengthening the legal framework to ensure that technology deployment in elections is credible, secure, and aligned with Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC’s technical readiness.

He stressed that to misrepresent the measured legislative position as “rejection” is either a profound misunderstanding of legislative procedure or a deliberate distortion for political mileage.

According to Oladejo, “The Lagos APC has taken note of recent clarifications by Senate President Godswill Akpabio and Senator Enyinnaya Abaribe, which reaffirm the long-standing position of the Senate in supporting the use of technology, including electronic transmission of election results, in line with the Electoral Act and subject to the operational capacity of INEC.

“These clarifications categorically debunk the false and misleading narrative that the Senate rejected electronic transmission of results-a claim hastily amplified by Mr. Peter Obi without due regard for the facts.

“Once again, this episode exposes Mr. Obi’s habitual rush to judgment and preference for sensational commentary over verifiable records. It is unpresidential, statesmanlike, and indeed unstable for anyone aspiring to the highest office in the land to consistently rush to the media without first ascertaining the facts of any issue.

“Any discerning observer is entitled to ask Mr. Obi and his ilks a fundamental question: why the desperate and relentless attempt to discredit the electoral process, unnecessarily heat up the polity, and undermine confidence in Nigeria’s democracy.?

“Such conduct is neither accidental nor harmless. It fuels mistrust, stokes division, and places personal political ambition above national stability. Fortunately, Nigerians are far more perceptive than these actors assume and can clearly read through the mischief.

“This latest episode is not an isolated slip; it fits into a growing pattern of gaffes that have steadily diminished and demystified the carefully constructed image surrounding Mr. Obi.

“Over time, he has carved a niche for himself by consistently dropping the ball-often with his pants metaphorically down- commenting on complex legislative, economic, and policy matters without adequate verification, only for official records and responsible authorities to contradict his claims.

“His selective use of statistics and half-truths, frequently stripped of context, has further eroded confidence in his public interventions and reinforced the perception of narrative-driven, rather than fact-driven engagement.

“Equally troubling is Mr. Obi’s persistent habit of portraying Nigeria in an unrelentingly negative light, particularly on international platforms. While constructive criticism is essential in any democracy, his repeated emphasis on national failures-without balance, context, or responsibility-undermines investor confidence, damages national morale, and raises serious questions about the patriotism expected of someone seeking to lead the country.

“This posture is further weakened by glaring contradictions between his current rhetoric and the realities of policies and practices that prevailed during his own time in public office.

“Mr. Obi’s overreliance on social media populism has led to premature statements, avoidable reversals, and recurring public embarrassment.

“His reluctance to firmly rein in-or clearly disassociate himself from-extremist conduct by some of his supporters has also cast doubt on his leadership temperament and his capacity to foster national cohesion.

“Too often, his interventions on sensitive national issues appear emotion-driven and reactionary, deepening divisions rather than offering the calm, steady, and unifying leadership Nigeria requires.

“With these recurring pitfalls, no one should be surprised that the opposition continues to totter and falter. This persistent instability is simply a reflection of its leadership.

“The Lagos APC believes that democracy is strengthened by truth, accuracy, restraint, and responsibility-not by careless misrepresentation or the compulsive urge to disparage the very country one seeks to govern.

“Nigeria deserves leadership anchored in diligence, emotional intelligence, and genuine patriotism. Once again, the facts have spoken-and once again, Peter Obi got it wrong.”

The pan Yoruba socio-political organisation, Afenifere, on Friday, took a swipe at the Senate for rejecting the mandatory real-time electronic transmission of results and digital voter identification.

Afenifere, in a statement by its Leader and National Publicity Secretary, Oba Oladipo Olaitan and Prince Justice Faloye, Afenifere National Publicity Secretary, described the Senate’s decision as betrayal of constitutionalism and multiparty democracy.

On February 4, 2026, the upper chamber passed the Electoral Act 2022 (Repeal and Re-enactment) Amendment Bill 2026.

Reacting to rejection of the mandatory electronic transmission of results, the Yoruba body said: “This is tantamount to a betrayal of constitutionalism and multiparty democracy, as it prioritizes political incumbency over democratic integrity. This decision is obviously self serving and a move towards one party state, teleguided by the executive as witnessed over the years in Lagos State.


“It is an assault on national conscience* – Afenifere is astounded by the Nigerian Senate decision to reject key amendments to the Electoral Act 2022, including mandatory electronic transmission of results and downloadable electronic voters’ cards with QR codes. This move, ahead of the 2027 elections, perpetuates manual processes prone to manipulation and undermining electoral credibility. By retaining discretionary language that allows INEC to “prescribe the manner” of transfer, the Senate preserves the ability to rig through manual collation loopholes that have historically enabled result manipulation and post-election disputes.

“While the Senate claims electronic transmission is “still allowed” under existing law, the Supreme Court previously ruled that such transmission is not mandatory because it is not explicitly provided for in the Electoral Act 2022. By refusing to codify it as a legal requirement in the 2026 Bill, the Senate intentionally leaves the process vulnerable to administrative “glitches” or selective non-compliance, undermining the spirit of the Nigerian Constitution’s call for free and fair elections.


“Section 78 of the 1999 Constitution empowers the National Assembly to legislate for credible federal elections. Unfortunately, the Senate has subverted the mandatory transparency by rejecting an amendment to Clause 60(3) which would have legally compelled INEC to transmit results from polling units to the IReV portal in real-time. By rejecting mandatory electronic transmission, the Senate fails to advance constitutional imperatives for fair elections, allowing potential interference that contravene the spirit of democratic governance and equal suffrage under Sections 117-119. The rejection of Clause 47, which sought to allow downloadable electronic voter cards with QR codes, forces a continued reliance on physical Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs). This decision disenfranchises voters who may lose their physical cards and ignores modern digital identification advancements, directly contradicting the goal of making elections more accessible.

“Globally, from the USA to the newest democracies like Estonia that became democratic after Nigeria, there is end-to-end verifiability in electronic systems to ensure integrity and auditability, so why not Nigeria? Countries such as Estonia implement secure internet voting with universal verifiability, reducing manipulation risks. The Nigerian Senate, by keeping transmission optional, lags behind these standards, fostering opacity instead of trust.

“Afenifere calls on the Joint committee setup to harmonize the different House of Representatives and Senate versions, to let democracy survive by accepting mandatory real time electronic transmission of election results from polling booths to iRev. Otherwise the legislature will be sending clear signals that it is not yet ready to fully embrace a credible, technology-driven electoral framework for the 2027 General Elections. Afenifere cautions that care has to be taken not to completely lose peoples trust in the current democratic disposition. Let democracy breathe.”

A coalition of over 70 civil society organizations (CSOs) advocating for credible elections, on Friday, insisted on mandatory real-time electronic transmission of 2027 general election results.

The CSOs, which operate via the Nigeria Civil Society Situation Room, flayed what they described as the Senate’s passage of a retrogressive version of the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill 2026.


According to the group, rather than strengthening the country’s electoral framework ahead of the 2027 poll, “the Senate’s amendments weaken critical safeguards for transparency, credibility, and public trust in elections.”

They urged the Conference Committee of the National Assembly to retain progressive provisions agreed by the Joint Committees, particularly real-time electronic transmission of results and realistic electoral timelines

The statement, which was made available to Vanguard, read: “The Nigeria Civil Society Situation Room expresses grave concern and profound disappointment over the passage by the Senate of a watered-down and retrogressive version of the Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill 2026.”

“The version passed by the Senate substantially departs from the progressive reforms agreed by the Joint National Assembly Committees on Electoral Matters after extensive consultations with stakeholders.

“Rather than strengthening Nigeria’s electoral framework ahead of the 2027 General Elections, the Senate’s amendments weaken critical safeguards for transparency, credibility, and public trust in elections.

“Of particular concern is the Senate’s removal of provisions mandating real-time electronic transmission of election results from polling units to INEC’s Result Viewing Portal (IReV).

“This reform enjoys broad public support and is widely recognised as essential to reducing manipulation, enhancing transparency, and restoring confidence in the electoral process.

“By making electronic transmission discretionary, the Senate has reopened loopholes that Nigeria’s electoral reforms were designed to close.

“This decision directly contradicts the position of the House of Representatives, which explicitly approved mandatory real-time transmission during its clause-by-clause consideration of the Bill.


“It is also a troubling retreat from lessons learned during the 2023 General Elections, where the absence of mandatory real-time transmission contributed significantly to disputes, litigation, and widespread public mistrust of election outcomes.

“Equally disturbing is the Senate’s decision to reduce the timeline for the issuance of the Notice of Elections from 360 days to 180 days before polling day.

“The existing timeline under the Electoral Act 2022 was carefully crafted to provide INEC with sufficient lead time for voter registration activities, logistics planning, training and deployment of ad-hoc staff, voter education, and procurement.

“Halving this period will severely constrain preparations, increase operational risks, and heighten the likelihood of avoidable failures.


“Compressed timelines will also negatively affect political parties by squeezing their internal processes, escalating disputes over primaries and nominations, and triggering increased pre-election litigation—further destabilising the electoral calendar.

“Situation Room finds it particularly disturbing that these retrogressive amendments were introduced despite sustained civic engagement.

“On 28 January 2026, Situation Room led a peaceful protest at the National Assembly, calling for the passage of the Bill in the form agreed by the Joint Committees. The Senate’s action reflects a troubling disregard for citizen advocacy and stakeholder consensus.

“While the constitution of a Conference (Harmonisation) Committee is a recognised legislative procedure, it must not become a channel for further weakening electoral reforms. The harmonisation process presents a final opportunity to protect the integrity of Nigeria’s electoral system.

“Situation Room, therefore, calls on the Conference Committee to retain the progressive provisions agreed by the Joint Committees, particularly mandatory real-time electronic transmission of results and realistic electoral timelines.

“We also urge the leadership of the National Assembly to demonstrate statesmanship and ensure that the final Bill strengthens—rather than undermines—Nigeria’s democracy,” the statement, which was jointly signed by the Convener of the Nigeria Civil Society Situation Room, Mr. Yunusa Z. Ya’u, and the two Co-Conveners, Mma Odi and Celestine Odo, further read.

Organizations in the coalition include Action Aid Nigeria, Centre for Information Technology and Development (CITAD), Centre for Democracy and Development (CDD), Policy and Legal Advocacy Centre (PLAC), CLEEN Foundation, Rule of Law and Accountability Advocacy Centre (RULAAC), and Joint National Association of Persons with Disability (JONAPWD)

TimeManager:
As sophisticated as technology deployed by Telecoms, Banks, others, they do experience technical glitches unannounced and unexpectedly.

In South Africa, there was technical glitches that marred the general election, same as was experienced in Nigeria. Therefore it makes complete sense for INEC to have options going into the the election.

-Kiss the truth!





You are only ranting from a place of ignorance. Technology is not 100% full proof or reliable.

-Kiss the truth!




We saw how glitches marred last JAMB exams that they had to apologize to some students and have them rewrite the exams. No tech is full proof. Even in the last US election, lots of mails were alleged to have been compromised.

-Kiss the truth!

IkeOnyia:
IPOB are known to be serial liars. Onitsha market is open and trading going on.

IkeOnyia:
IPOB are known to be serial liars. Onitsha market is open and trading going on.

BigCowHornn:
The Peter obi busy body crew is here


🤣😆