₦airaland Forum

Most of the loan apps are owned by one Chinese company with sokoloan as the main parent company


What they do is create several cloan sites so that former customers who have vowed never to have any thing with them will think they are accessing a different app.


But there is something more sinister about this Chinese owned apps .

How they got liscence from CBN and why CBN doesn't seem to care on their extremely outrageous interests shows either complete lack of regulation on their part or that these loan sharks have both CBN and bank part ownership.

kode12:
Over a hundred thousand people receive the vaccine daily in the UK. How many have died as a result of the vaccine? Instead of bothering your head with COVID-19 vaccine that'd never get to you focus on ensuring your next malaria medication is not a fake that can kill you.

In less than a month since this vaccine got unvieled, the deaths and allergic reactions from those who have taken it is well a above the tolerance level. Over 40% so far have reported serious allergic reactions and there have been recorded deaths which they want you to believe are all coincidental and nothing to do with their vaccines

A vaccine that never went through the standard safety scrutiny with safety studies on human subjects not being released to the public.

Keep believing CNN.

ionsman:
Fake story

Google's fact checker has been fact checked and debunked as a fake fact checker.

Is Google an authority on what is real or not ? Are they a news outfit ?

Use brain for once

Same Google that was funding the since discredited Snopes.com had to now do their own fact checker as if any sensible person still uses that heavily censored search engine which they destroyed out of their stupid woke culture .

Nairalandian:
Credible news sources have debunked the rumor that she died.

Credible ?

You mean propaganda outlets of Big Pharma ?


When will you start thinking for yourself ?

Or are you one of the legions of shills unleashed by BMGF on Nigerian cyberspace to shill for both his virus and vaccine solution ?

Mynd44 keep burying my threads here so it can die naturally

Keep doing the work you are paid to do.

Media is also not reporting on hundreds of new cases of HIV from among people who took this vaccine in Australia

When a vaccine has HIV inserts and you allow yourself to be injected or rather infected deliberately in the name of vaccinating against a virus with a 98.8%recovry rate who do you blame or hold responsible ?


Your bloody idiot self is whom you are to be mad at.

Nairalandian:
Hmmm..
So what are you trying to say now, that we should not take the vaccine?
How are you sure that she didn't have an underlying problem which could've triggered her death

You are free to be my Guinea pig and be first on the line for it.

Meanwhile another nurse suffers Bells palsy after taking her own jab.

Tennessee nurse Khalilah Mitchell develops Bell’s pallsy after vaxxed

There were 4 people who got Bells Palsy from the Pfizer vaccine before it rolled lout in America. In 2 weeks there are at least 4 more now.


If this video is real (accurate), it means also that CDC and Pfizer are lying about side-effects

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dujS9K_H9Io
They have only confesssed “severe allergic reactions” and “anaphylactic reactios” but not facial palsy or GBS

Facial Palsy is a more severe side effect than “allergic reaction”

[s]

NwaNimo1:
She's now died like 6 times.........i beg.

[/s].

You shills at BMGF should be the first to take the vaxx.

FarahAideed:
She asked for it

Can't agree more

She was a Judas goat employed to convince the sheep to follow her to the slaughter house.

LogoDesigner01:
Who do we hold responsible now

No one.

You can't sue anyone since Big Pharma, US FDA and Bill Gates foundation have all gotten their immunity card.

You see why you need to not trust the damn media and useless corrupt govt officials

Our own useless NAFDAC , ministry for health, NCDC and Presidency have since been bought .

TIFFANY DOVER the nurse who fainted on live TV after receiving the Pfizer vaccine is dead.


The media is not reporting on this. The family has been told no to go public but a death certificate has since been issued for her death and reported on ancestry.org.


https://www.bitchute.com/video/rU6b2Adh21y1

Her family can't sue Pfizer or US FDA since they are both covered by immunity.

Side note on all of you pro Gates

An experimental Heppatitis B vaccine was what caused AIDS pandemic.

Only God knows what these for profit [emphasis on profit] big pharma companies are pushing out all for more money.

Do not be a fool and follow the herd or listen to their online agents whom are many here. Even the mods here are all shills and paid and bought for by Bill Gates foundation.

Knowledge is power and they will do all they can to stop you from learning the truth.

ChiefJusticeFuc:
1978–1981: Is HIV-AIDS linked to CDC’s Hepatitis B Vaccine Experiment?

In 1978–1981, the CDC conducted a hepatitis B vaccine experiment on homosexual men living in New York City, San Francisco and Los Angeles. HIV/AIDS was first detected among the participants in the CDC hepatitis B vaccine trial and quickly spread throughout the gay community in those cities. A body of evidence, including a detailed statistical analysis of the documented time line of when HIV infection was detected in the men’s blood and reported to the CDC. Dissidents who have studied the available published data are convinced that this ill-conceived experiment precipitated the devastating AIDS epidemic in America’s homosexual community. The gay men in the experiment were injected with a vaccine that had been made using human hepatitis B infected blood which was injected into chimpanzees known to be infected with the cancer causing simian virus 40 (SV40); the virus that had contaminated the polio vaccine.

Before these CDC experiments there were no reported cases of HIV or AIDS in America. The AIDS epidemic was officially declared by CDC in 1981, at the conclusion of the experiment. Yet, in the NEJM published report (1980) researchers proclaimed the vaccine “safe and incidence of side effects low,” and claimed a 96% success rate. They failed to mention the emergence of a new disease affecting some of the subjects.

The men in the Manhattan experiment had the highest rate of HIV ever recorded for that time period: 20% were discovered to be HIV-positive in 1980, and over 40% in 1984. In addition, a re-examination of the stored blood samples from an AIDS trial in NYC by epidemiologists at the National Cancer Institute in 1999, found that one out of five gay men (20%) tested positive for the new KS herpes-8 virus (Kaposi’s Sarcoma virus in 1982.

Before 1978 no stored blood anywhere in the US tested positive for either HIV or the Kaposi’s Sarcoma virus (which was not identified until 1994).

An extraordinary PBS taped interview (1987) with medical historian Edward Shorter and Dr. Maurice Hilleman, Merck’s foremost vaccine developer acknowledged that the polio vaccine (manufactured by Merck) had been contaminated with SV40. He also indicated the likelihood that SV40 is the source of AIDS: “I didn’t know we were importing AIDS.”

He nevertheless defended the contaminated vaccine stating: “it was good science at the time because that was what you did. You didn’t worry about these wild viruses…”
The taped interview was never aired for fear of liability; but it was submitted to the Library of Congress and in 2011 was posted on YouTube.

How did these two viruses of primate origin get into the gay male population to cause AIDS and a contagious form of cancer? Can the AIDS epidemic in the US can be traced directly to CDC’s experiments? Given the lethal nature of these two combined viruses, it is likely that many, if not most, of the men in the CDC experiment eventually died of AIDS. The actual number of AIDS deaths among the men in the experiment has never been revealed, nor have their medical records been studied. Efforts to obtain this information have been rebuffed invoking the “confidential” nature of the experiment to deny access. Read more… (Alan Cantwell, MD., Gay Vaccine Experiments and the American (Not African) Origin of Aids, 2011; The Virus Cancer Program, 2005

Gates, the mRNA vaccine makers including Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna, and their close allies such as Dr. Tony Fauci of the NIAID are clearly playing fast and loose with human lives in their rush to get these experimental vaccines into our bodies. Notably, the same Dr. Fauci and his NIAID owns the patent on a vaccine for dengue fever known as Dengvaxia, marketed by Sanofi-Pasteur and promoted as an “essential” vaccine by Tedros’ WHO since 2016. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. noted that Fauci and NIAID “knew from the clinical trials that there was a problem with paradoxical immune response,” but they gave it to several hundred thousand Filipino kids anyway. It was estimated that as many as 600 vaccinated children died before the government stopped the vaccinations.

Clearly the well-established Precautionary Principle–if in serious doubt, don’t– is being ignored by Fauci, Pfizer/BioNTech and others in rushing to approve the new mRNA vaccine for coronavirus. Messenger RNA technology has yet to produce an approved medicine, let alone a vaccine.

*

F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”where this article was originally published. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization.

Human guinea pigs?

The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is experimental and far from guaranteed safe, despite the fact that Pfizer, the EU and the notorious Dr Tony Fauci seem ready to roll it out even before year end to hundreds of millions of humans.

The experimental technology is based on a rather new gene manipulation known as gene editing. In a major article in the 2018 New York Council on Foreign Relations magazine, Foreign Affairs, Bill Gates effusively promoted the novel gene editing CRISPR technology as being able to “transform global development.” He noted that his Gates Foundation had been financing gene editing developments for vaccines and other applications for a decade.

But is the technology for breaking and splicing of human genes so absolutely safe that it is worth risking on a novel experimental vaccine never before used on humans? Contrary to what Bill Gates claims, the scientific answer is no, it is not proven so safe.

In a peer reviewed article in the October, 2020 journal Trends in Genetics, the authors conclude that “the range of possible molecular events resulting from genome editing has been underestimated and the technology remains unpredictable on, and away from, the target locus.”

Dr. Romeo Quijano, retired professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology at the College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, noted some of the dangers of the experimental gene editing when applied to human vaccines. Quijano warns of,

“the danger that the vaccine might actually “enhance” the pathogenicity of the virus, or make it more aggressive possibly due to antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), as what happened with previous studies on test vaccines in animals. If that should happen in a major human trial the outcome could be disastrous. This serious adverse effect may not even be detected by a clinical trial especially in highly biased clinical trials laden with conflicts of interest involving vaccine companies. Even when a serious adverse event is detected, this is usually swept under the rug.”

He cites the case of another Gates mRNA vaccine candidate, Moderna, where “three of the 15 human experimental subjects in the high dose group suffered serious and medically significant symptoms. Moderna, however, concluded that the vaccine was “generally safe and well tolerated,” which the corporate-dominated media dutifully reported, covering-up the real danger…”

He notes,

“Exogenous mRNA is inherently immune-stimulatory, and this feature of mRNA could be beneficial or detrimental. It may provide adjuvant activity and it may inhibit antigen expression and negatively affect the immune response. The paradoxical effects of innate immune sensing on different formats of mRNA vaccines are incompletely understood.” Quijano adds, “A mRNA-based vaccine could also induce potent type I interferon responses, which have been associated not only with inflammation but also potentially with autoimmunity… and may promote blood coagulation and pathological thrombus formation.”

Quijano writes in the extensively documented article,

“among other dangers, the virus-vectored vaccines could undergo recombination with naturally occurring viruses and produce hybrid viruses that could have undesirable properties affecting transmission or virulence. The…possible outcomes of recombination are practically impossible to quantify accurately given existing tools and knowledge. The risks, however, are real, as exemplified by the emergence of mutant types of viruses, enhanced pathogenicity and unexpected serious adverse events (including death) following haphazard mass vaccination campaigns and previous failed attempts to develop chimeric vaccines using genetic engineering technology.”

“Explicitly expeimental”

Dr. Michael Yeadon replied in a recent public social media comment to a colleague in the UK; “All vaccines against the SARS-COV-2 virus are by definition novel. No candidate vaccine has been… in development for more than a few months.” Yeadon then went on to declare,

“If any such vaccine is approved for use under any circumstances that are not EXPLICITLY experimental, I believe that recipients are being misled to a criminal extent. This is because there are precisely zero human volunteers for…whom there could possibly be more than a few months past-dose safety information.”

Yeadon is well qualified to make the critique. As he notes in the comment, “I have a degree in Biochemistry & Toxicology & a research based PhD in pharmacology. I have spent 32 years working in pharmaceutical R&, mostly in new medicines for disorders of lung & skin. I was a VP at Pfizer & CEO…. of a biotech I founded (Ziarco – acquired by Novartis). I’m knowledgeable about new medicine R&.” He was formerly with Pfizer at a very senior level.

The German Partner

Pfizer, famous for its Viagra and other drugs, has partnered with a small Mainz, Germany company, BioNTech, which has developed the radical mRNA technique used to produce the new corona vaccine. BioNTech was only founded in 2008. BioNTech signed an agreement with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in September, 2019, just before announcement in Wuhan China of the Novel Coronavirus and just before BioNTech made its stock market debut. The agreement involved cooperation on developing new mRNA techniques to treat cancer and HIV. Curiously that press release, “The Gates Foundation sees BioNTech potential to ‘dramatically reduce global HIV and tuberculosis’” 05. September 2019, has now been deleted.

BioNTech also has an agreement with one of the largest drug producers in China, Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd (“Fosun Pharma”) to develop a version of its mRNA vaccine for novel coronavirus for the Chinese market. Ai-Min Hui, President of Global R& of Fosun Pharma said in an August statement, “Dosing the first Chinese subject with BNT162b1 marks a milestone of the global co-development program in China. We are closely working with BioNTech and regulatory authorities to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BNT162b1 and other mRNA vaccine candidates…”

This means that the same German biotech company is behind the covid vaccines being rushed out in China as well as the USA and EU. The vaccine is being rushed through to eventual approval in an alarmingly short time.

Both US and EU authorities and presumably also Chinese, waived the standard animal tests using ferrets or mice and have gone straight to human “guinea pigs.” Human tests began in late July and early August. Three months is unheard of for testing a new vaccine. Several years is the norm. Because of the degree of global panic engendered by WHO over the coronavirus, caution is thrown to the wind. Vaccine makers all have legal indemnity, meaning they can’t be sued if people die or are maimed from the new vaccine. But the most alarming fact about the new Pfizer-BioNTech gene edited vaccine is that the gene edited mRNA for human vaccine application has never before been approved. Notably, two year peer reviewed tests with mice fed genetically modified corn sprayed with Monsanto glyphosate-rich Roundup first showed cancer tumors after nine months as well as liver and other organ damage. Earlier Monsanto company tests ended at three months and claimed no harm. A similar situation exists with the gene edited mRNA vaccines that are being rushed out after less than 90 days human tests.

Suspicious events

However it seems Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, doesn’t share the confidence of his own claims. On the day his company issued its press release on the proposed vaccine trials, he sold 62% of his stock in Pfizer, making millions profit in the deal. He made the sell order in a special option in August so it would not appear as “insider selling”, however he also timed it just after the US elections and the mainstream media illegitimately declared Joe Biden President-elect. It seems from appearances that Bourla had a pretty clear conflict of interest in the timing of his press release on the same day.

Bourla lied and denied to the Press that his company had received any funds from the Trump Administration to develop the vaccine when it came out they contracted in summer to deliver 100 million doses to the US Government. Further adding to the suspect actions of Pfizer was the fact the company first informed the team of Joe biden rather than the relevant US government agencies.

But this is far from the only thing alarming about the much-hyped Pfizer announcement.

F. William Engdahl – Global Research Dec 25, 2020
Bill Gates is actively financing and promoting new untested vaccines supposed to keep us at least somewhat safe from a ‘ghastly” death from the novel coronavirus and supposedly allow us to resume somewhat “normal” lives. The Pharma giant Pfizer has now announced what they claim were spectacular results in initial human tests. They use an experimental technology known as gene editing, specifically mRNA gene-editing, something never before used in vaccines. Before we rush to get jabbed in hopes of some immunity, we should know more about the radical experimental technology and its lack of precision.

The financial world went ballistic on November 9 when the pharma giant Pfizer and its German partner, BioNTech, announced in a company press release that it had developed a vaccine for Covid19 that was “90%” effective.

The controversial US head of NIAID, Tony Fauci rushed to greet the news and the EU announced it had purchased 300 million doses of the costly new vaccine. If you believe financial markets, the pandemic is all but past history.

At the Dachau Concentration Camp Trial of Nov./ Dec. 1945, the world-renowned expert in parasitic tropical diseases, Dr. Klaus Karl Schilling, aged 74, was adjudged to have been directly responsible for the deaths of ten prisoners at the camp, who had been compelled to participate in medical research experiments conducted by Schilling, purposed toward the development of a vaccine for malaria.
An American forensic pathologist tasked with providing intel to the military authorities, Dr. Charles Larson noted,

“It was very difficult to know where to draw the line as to whether or not Dr. Schilling was a war criminal. Certainly he fell into that category inasmuch as he had subjected people involuntarily to experimental malaria inoculations, which even though they did not produce many deaths, could very well have produced serious illness in many of the patients.”

Documents were brought forward in Schilling’s defence, proving that the U.S. had also been conducting malaria experiments during the war and that in three states alone, 800 prison inmates, some of whom were conscientious objectors, were forcibly made to participate in vaccine trials. This evidence was considered to be of no mitigation, however.
Dr. Schilling was hanged in May 1946 and his distraught wife was cruelly sentenced to attend her husband’s execution as an unwilling witness.

Bill Gates should pay heed to Schilling’s story. Gates’ peace-time kill-tally exceeds Schilling’s by powers of ten. Where are the gallows for Gates?
Equally, anyone employed by Gates, in any capacity, should note, that the court at Dachau rejected Schilling’s plea of mitigation that he was obliged by direct order of Heinrich Himmler to head the research. The tribunal declared that this had no bearing on the charges against Schilling. Know, therefore, Bill Gates employees, that legalistic pettifogging and expert manoeuvering will bring you no succour. You know who you are. Resign your posts immediately because it will not be long before we know who you are. Leave your job if you work for Bill or Melinda Gates – and you might yet spare yourselves the condemnation of your peers, for crimes against humanity, in a court of law. If you lack the courage to resign, it’s especially important that you resign right away because you will be an embarrasment to creation, blubbering coward in the heavens, terrified and shaking, when you stand before God. You have to resign right now though – not tomorrow or the next day.

The Dachau verdicts have no standing as precedent in common law because the judicial authority presiding was the U.S. General Military Court. The verdicts influenced later trials and were given partial expression in the 1947 Ten Point Nuremberg Code, which was a set of guidelines for “permissable medical experiments.” The first of these ten codes outlined is “the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.” The legal precept of “voluntary informed consent” is its modern extrapolation (at least in the U.K.)

Beware of the wikipedia entry on Schilling – it’s full of (likely deliberate) errors. A fuller treatment of the “Doctors’ Trial” is given by John Wear in his fascinating article for the journal Inconvenient History, called “Medical Experimentation At Dachau” which can be found at

https://inconvenienthistory.com/11/1/6354

So thanks to Fauci and Gates this scenario is about to repeat itself under the disguise of the sars cov2 vaccine created in a Wuhan Biolab where it was boosted with hiv1 all payed for and directly sponsored by Fauci for mass rollout by Gates through his influence and control over the WHO.

Bioweapon not a virus.Viruses are impossible to find and isolate,manmade deadly vaccines aka genetically modified proteins, well that can be done.They call that a virus to cover-up what it really is.Smoke and mirrors.

1978–1981: Is HIV-AIDS linked to CDC’s Hepatitis B Vaccine Experiment?

In 1978–1981, the CDC conducted a hepatitis B vaccine experiment on homosexual men living in New York City, San Francisco and Los Angeles. HIV/AIDS was first detected among the participants in the CDC hepatitis B vaccine trial and quickly spread throughout the gay community in those cities. A body of evidence, including a detailed statistical analysis of the documented time line of when HIV infection was detected in the men’s blood and reported to the CDC. Dissidents who have studied the available published data are convinced that this ill-conceived experiment precipitated the devastating AIDS epidemic in America’s homosexual community. The gay men in the experiment were injected with a vaccine that had been made using human hepatitis B infected blood which was injected into chimpanzees known to be infected with the cancer causing simian virus 40 (SV40); the virus that had contaminated the polio vaccine.

Before these CDC experiments there were no reported cases of HIV or AIDS in America. The AIDS epidemic was officially declared by CDC in 1981, at the conclusion of the experiment. Yet, in the NEJM published report (1980) researchers proclaimed the vaccine “safe and incidence of side effects low,” and claimed a 96% success rate. They failed to mention the emergence of a new disease affecting some of the subjects.

The men in the Manhattan experiment had the highest rate of HIV ever recorded for that time period: 20% were discovered to be HIV-positive in 1980, and over 40% in 1984. In addition, a re-examination of the stored blood samples from an AIDS trial in NYC by epidemiologists at the National Cancer Institute in 1999, found that one out of five gay men (20%) tested positive for the new KS herpes-8 virus (Kaposi’s Sarcoma virus in 1982.

Before 1978 no stored blood anywhere in the US tested positive for either HIV or the Kaposi’s Sarcoma virus (which was not identified until 1994).

An extraordinary PBS taped interview (1987) with medical historian Edward Shorter and Dr. Maurice Hilleman, Merck’s foremost vaccine developer acknowledged that the polio vaccine (manufactured by Merck) had been contaminated with SV40. He also indicated the likelihood that SV40 is the source of AIDS: “I didn’t know we were importing AIDS.”

He nevertheless defended the contaminated vaccine stating: “it was good science at the time because that was what you did. You didn’t worry about these wild viruses…”
The taped interview was never aired for fear of liability; but it was submitted to the Library of Congress and in 2011 was posted on YouTube.

How did these two viruses of primate origin get into the gay male population to cause AIDS and a contagious form of cancer? Can the AIDS epidemic in the US can be traced directly to CDC’s experiments? Given the lethal nature of these two combined viruses, it is likely that many, if not most, of the men in the CDC experiment eventually died of AIDS. The actual number of AIDS deaths among the men in the experiment has never been revealed, nor have their medical records been studied. Efforts to obtain this information have been rebuffed invoking the “confidential” nature of the experiment to deny access. Read more… (Alan Cantwell, MD., Gay Vaccine Experiments and the American (Not African) Origin of Aids, 2011; The Virus Cancer Program, 2005

The location of the bombing raises a lot of questions .

1. The car was parked and detonated in front of an NSA listening post of an AT&T switch board.

2. The building were the bomb exploded houses one of Dominions servers now under investigation and audit

3. The same building has been blotted out by Google Street map

4. CCTV captured what appeared to be an incoming high velocity object from the air that appeared to have hit the car.

Some say it was a missile strike and the guy in the car was already dead and placed there to make it look like a suicide bombing.

There is a civil war going on in the US and it involves the CIA and Mossad on one hand vs the Secret service and loyal branches of the US military .

[quote author=Iamgrey5 posts=97508312]Obasanjo was controlling the ibadan division with majority of Yoruba soilders sir

The middle belt military men controlled by Northerners were attacking from Enugu end of the war not from the West.[/quote]Then what of the division at Benin and the Ijo army ? Where they stationed at Ibadan?

Iamgrey5:
Abiola won Elections in Yoruba land with a margin no one have managed to match except baba Awolowo.himself.

I remembered Nadeco and those that led it

I remembered what led to Opc

I clearly remembered those that led a million match for Abacha.

Abiola won because IBB backed him and this gave most of the south , MB and even parts of the north to vote for him.

It was this endoresment from IBB and a section of the SMC that made people troop out and vote for Abiola.

The Igbo did not vote for Abiola for reasons best known to them and I know they played a huge part in the annulment and were heavily invested in the Abacha govt and Also rock court that they can not be counted in any way or form part of the call to return to democratic rule and I also know they went as far as rallying support for Abacha's transition to civil rule. That's their kind of dirty selfish politics.

Iamgrey5:
oh you forgot how igbos have often worked against their brothers that have led to them not producing a president after 60 years of Nigeria existence.

You forgot the role certain igbos played that denied Peter obi the vice presidential slot in the last election.

You forgot how certain igbos played a significant role that led to Orji uzor to prison.

Don't throw stones if you live in a glass house.

FYI, I am not Igbo.

Secondly , if you go through my posts on this thread you will see where I stated that this is not a unique problem to Yorubas but to the south which makes us rudderless since no one is ready to stick his neck out when betrayal is certain.

Iamgrey5:
You obviously don't know what led to the civil war.

Or have you forgotten that every soldier had to return to their region.

As field commander , Obasanjo controlled several battalions and divisions

Was Adekunle's Marine Brigade operating out of Lagos or Benin?

Ofemannnu:
Give an instance where they wholly deserted their leader in the South. Remember everybody in a,family cannot think unanimously especially when they are educated. Followers of Awolowo stuck to him until his demise and even called themselves Awoists after his death.

Let me also add here that Yoruba elders where mocking Abiola when Abacha jailed him saying he betrayed Awolowo by supporting Shagari's campaign .
They did same for Obasanjo , Diya and one ilorun General that was sentenced to death by Abacha. They said they did not support Abiola and were feeding off Abacha and so can not call for their release.

When Obasanjo came out of prison and became the candidate for the PDP, same Yoruba elders said they won't support him and threw their weight on Olu False. Why should Obasanjo give them any attention when his release from prison and ascension to the presidency was not by their doing but purely by the north?

Ofemannnu:
When Yorubas want to leave Nigeria,they will leave without breaking a sweat.Yoruba soldiers were the heroes of the civil war and won the war for Nigeria with brawn and brain.

No one is denying the roles played by Yoruba generals and commanders in the civil war but you must understand the men they commanded were not all yorruba but majorly from the middle belt and north.

A battle tested General like Obasanjo would have been able to discern which nationality were more gallant of cowardly .

Ofemannnu:
Give an instance where they wholly deserted their leader in the South. Remember everybody in a,family cannot think unanimously especially when they are educated. Followers of Awolowo stuck to him until his demise and even called themselves Awoists after his death.

But Awo's undoing came from one of his followers .

Was Akintola not in the same camp with Awo before he was enticed by the NPC to weaken Awo's political grip in the western region and federal Parliament ?

Have you also forgotten how Yoruba elders goaded Abiola to continue the struggle and remain in prison but were going to Aso Rock to collect scraps from Abacha? Even those in NADECO were feeding fat from Abiola and his friends abroad and only paying lip service to the real agenda. For this reason, as long as Abiola was in detention , they were in business for themselves.

Obasanjo knows these people very well.

They are like praise singers in an owambe who will shower praises on you and as you begin to spray them they will be insulting you within. Too much money and you be maga, too small and you are a miser..

That is Yoruba politicians and elders for you.

Ofemannnu:
Obasanjo might be an Anambran after all.
He has done everything to oppose the progress of the Yorubas.Reason the Hausas brought him from prison to rule knowing fully well that he will always go against the Yorubas.God will judge Obasanjo the OSU claiming to be Yoruba.

Obasanjo and Fela may be miles apart but there is one thing they know very well about the Yoruba and that is that the Yoruba will only praise and show support to you when they are benefitting directly from you.

No single Yoruba elder spoke up when both Obasanjo and Fela were detained in prison.

Like Obasanjo, Fela was hated by majority of Yorubas and only readopted when he died. They will do same for Obasanjo just as they did with Abiola.

Obasanjo is a very wise man. Being a General is not in any way or form to be rekless. He knew nothing will come out of a struggle by the Yorubas to leave Nigeria other than a big loss. As an Army General, he knows where the strenght of the army is and that is the Awusa Fulani Muslim north and knows very well the Yoruba nation doesn't stand a chance.