₦airaland Forum

The sign is "To Easy" not "Too Easy"
The arrow also pointed to the hole "To Easy"

Big "Easy" is the slang name for New Orleans, just like we call Lagos "Las Gidi"


Cmoke

So you say below that EFCC is unconstitutional "...centralization of anti-corruption enforcement violates state sovereignty." The foregoing argument is laughable because unlike the USA where most states were truly sovereign prior to the formation of USA, .Nigeria states were NEVER sovereign as they were creations of their master - the federal government! Secondly, how do you reconcile your arguments with the power of the Nigeria Police to operate nationwide?


You also lost us when you argued below that since "... several state governments and public officials have raised concerns about the EFCC’s authority, particularly regarding its involvement in state financial matters. The ongoing debate about the legality of the EFCC underscores the need for clarity..." Since when do several armed robbers raising concern about anti robbery laws lead to the conclusion that the laws are unconstitutional?

Cmoke


By Angela Ochioma

Femi Falana’s defense of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) in response to Dr. Olisa Agbakoba’s claim about its legality raises several contradictions and shortcomings. While Falana attempts to paint the EFCC as constitutionally valid, his position undermines key principles of federalism and fails to address the agency's perceived overreach. The nature of Falana’s argument also reveals selective use of judicial rulings that gloss over essential nuances, weakening his stance on the EFCC’s legality.

One of the key issues with Falana’s argument is his dismissal of federalism concerns. Federalism is a core component of the Nigerian Constitution, which recognizes the autonomy of individual states in governance. Dr. Agbakoba’s critique of the EFCC hinges on this principle, arguing that the centralization of anti-corruption enforcement violates state sovereignty. Falana, however, overlooks this critical point. He defends the EFCC by asserting that the agency is supported by constitutional provisions, such as Section 15(5) of the 1999 Constitution, which mandates the state to abolish corrupt practices. But this broad interpretation of the law runs the risk of empowering the EFCC to interfere with state governments, eroding the delicate balance of power between the federal and state levels.

Falana's argument also suffers from internal inconsistency. On the one hand, he advocates for the authority of the EFCC to operate nationwide and prosecute corruption at all levels of government. On the other, he professes support for federalism, which emphasizes decentralization and the autonomy of states. This contradictory stance casts doubt on his commitment to the principle of federalism and raises concerns about his selective application of constitutional ideals. The EFCC, while vital in combatting corruption, operates in a manner that raises legitimate questions about federal overreach. Falana's failure to fully acknowledge these concerns undermines his broader argument.

Another issue with Falana’s defense is his selective citation of Supreme Court rulings to bolster the EFCC’s legality. He references past cases like **Attorney-General of Ondo State v Attorney-General of the Federation**, where the Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of anti-corruption bodies like the ICPC. However, this precedent does not directly translate to the EFCC’s operations, as the ICPC’s mandate and scope differ from the EFCC’s broader and more intrusive powers. The absence of a nuanced discussion on how these rulings apply to the unique challenges posed by the EFCC weakens Falana’s argument. Instead of addressing the specific nature of the EFCC’s overreach into state affairs, Falana uses broad rulings to justify its existence, ignoring the complexities involved in balancing federal powers with state sovereignty.

Moreover, Falana's failure to substantiate his claim that no court has ever declared the EFCC unconstitutional highlights a gap in his defense. While it may be true that no legal ruling has annulled the EFCC Act, this does not automatically legitimize the agency's actions, especially in cases where states have pushed back against federal interference. Falana overlooks the fact that several state governments and public officials have raised concerns about the EFCC’s authority, particularly regarding its involvement in state financial matters. The ongoing debate about the legality of the EFCC underscores the need for clarity, and Falana’s simplistic dismissal of these concerns does not help to resolve the issue.

Finally, Falana’s call for the National Assembly to amend the Constitution and formally entrench the EFCC and ICPC only further complicates his position. While this move may provide legal backing for the agencies’ existence, it does not address the fundamental issues of federal overreach and accountability. Instead of offering a comprehensive solution, Falana’s proposal risks entrenching an imbalance of power between the federal government and the states, potentially exacerbating tensions between different levels of governance.

In conclusion, Femi Falana’s defense of the EFCC is riddled with contradictions and selective reasoning. His argument overlooks the legitimate concerns of federalism, fails to engage with the nuances of judicial rulings, and sidesteps the ongoing debate about the agency's role in state affairs. While the fight against corruption is undoubtedly important, it must not come at the expense of state sovereignty or constitutional balance. Falana’s inconsistent defense does little to resolve these tensions and raises more questions than it answers about the future of anti-corruption efforts in Nigeria.

Hi guys,

I met Hakir via this forum and bought properties in two different estates (Rockview Estate and Penville Estate) in Abuja through him.

Based on my dealings with him since 2009, he is a man of integrity.

Ajayi Apata estate has been comatose since 1994. You can prove us wrong by posting the CURRENT pictures of your claimed activities inside Ajayi Apata.
You must understand that Nairaland is worldwide and not everybody can visit the estate at this time.

If u can comprehend basic English you will comply with the above reasonable request to protect fellow Nairalanders.

Cmoke

Since my warning in June below, let's hope the seller updates us with pictures.


Cmoke

Cmoke: Guys,

Shine your eyes properly on this Ajayi Apata stuff. That estate has been comatose since about 1994!

These pictures are mostly Fara Park Estates and Crown Estates which started at the same time.

Cmoke

THIS CAR WAS INVOLVED IN AN ACCIDENT AND NOW A TOTAL WRITEOFF.

Asking 1.2 million for everything


CALL MOSES AT 0701 182 7635

STILL AVAILABLE. I was out of the country but back now. Sorry if I missed your call.

Come get it!

Call now.

Guys,

Shine your eyes properly on this Ajayi Apata stuff. That estate has been comatose since about 1994!

These pictures are mostly Fara Park Estates and Crown Estates which started at the same time.

Cmoke

available

Hello Nairalanders
2001 Toyota Sienna LE For Immediate Sale - Tincan Cleared from California, USA
Very clean Interior and Exterior
Sound Engine and Automatic Transmission
Factory Fitted AC - Cold As Ice
Pioneer CD/AM-FM STEREO
Factory Tinted/Privacy Windows
Automatic Doors

Price: 1.3M LAST


CALL Moses 0701 182 7635 to inspect/buy this lovely ride.

Thanks a million for this. Gl above.o customer care was totally useless. Problem solved with your info

Is this property in Beverly Hills CA or somewhere else?

Dude,

There must be something wrong with your phone because you don't pick it up and you don't return calls.

Thanks guys.

Had to head back to California so car not yet sold oh. Will be back in Naija early March.

Now you can reach me via  Saacpa@yahoo.com with subject line ARMADA

Thanks a bunch.

WAS:

California Car

VIN 5N1AA08A66N707416

All leader

24inch Velocity Wheels

Just 65,000 original miles.

Asking price: 4.6 million

Location: LAGOS near Tin Can.

UPDATE:

I DID NOT SELL THIS CAR BUT DECIDED TO USE IT MYSELF.

TWO WEEKS AGO, THIS CAR WAS INVOLVED IN AN ACCIDENT AND NOW A TOTAL WRITEOFF. THANK ALMIGHTY GOD FOR MAKING ME SURVIVE THE ACCIDENT UNHURT!

Asking 1.2 million for everything (NEGOTIABLE)

YOU WILL BE BUYING IT FOR PARTS ONLY.


CALL MOSES AT 0701 182 7635