Codebase's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Codebase's Profile › Codebase's Posts
1 2 (of 2 pages)
Dear All, I need your help in completing an online survey. I totally guarantee that information supplied will be treated with utmost care and confidence. Please find link below. https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/NKKXSFJ N.B: Please this is not a scam or a website designed to obtain your personal information. |
@Frosbel How can jihad be a crime? It is not and it will never be, because every individual and group of people have a right to protect themselves this doesnt exclude muslims. @Frosbel Why do you think religious states like Isreal and self-styled Christian states like USA and ITALY have armies? You think it is to sing KUMBAYYA on the beach. The American military apparatus is worth over $1.1 trillion and you think all this to preach the love of christ. This love of Christ that you shout and preach all about, please can you tell any nation state that practises this? I really want to know which state that practises love of Christ i.e. when your enemy throws you an atomic bomb you turn your other cheek to receive the other atomic bomb. Even if the reason behind Sharia banking(and the dumbest Nigerian knows it not for this)was to promote Jihad, it doesnt make it wrong because defence is permissible by human nature itself "Do you know that this so called Islamic banking is not in the Quran ? It is a new phenomena".The ignorance displayed by Nigerian never seems to amaze me, Source of reference for the muslim is not just the Quraan, the y have the Authentic Sunnah of Messenger. The dictate general dictates for Islamic finance can be found in the Quraan but detailed dictates of Islamic finance are found in the Aunthentic Sunnah. the true seekers can check out this links below for more information http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_banking |
@FRosbel Why not say loud and clear and not be hypocritical about YOU ARE AGAINST MUSLIMS AND ISLAM!!! Because you can separate Sharia from Islam. They are one and the same thing. |
@frosbel Why aim for the speck in the eyes of the Muslims when you have log of wood in yours? Is this not sheer hypocrisy. Snr Pastor Erastus Akingbola(FORMER MD of intercontinental Bank) of Redeem Christian Church of Christ stole billions of Naira from poor Nigerians and paid a chunk of it in tithe to Pastor Enouch Adeboye, but this not a concern of yours obviously. The same for Cecilia Ibru, yet you walk up to Muslims calling them names. What shame!!!! When Intercontinental bank manager would enforce christian morning prayers on all their staff including muslim ones; no one called Intercontinetal a Christain bank. No one called for boycott of intercontinental bank because it was glaringly Christian. @frosbel People like you are the problem of this Nation. Thank God that Muslims has now being put in @the helms of affairs at intercontinental to diffuse poison left there by Akingbola @frosbel It is called Sharia Banking because it is guided by the dictates of the Sharia. So what!!!! Why do you want to make a fuss about it? Leave the Muslims to take their funds to Sharia banks and you take you money to cecelia ibru and Erastus Akingbola chikena. Hope dis settled the matter. |
Where are the Christians now; obviously running for their dear lives |
I think this Taxi-cab terrorist should be further investigated, there are obviously more where he came from. I think the Police should check Redeem Camp and Canaan Land, am sure they have a stock pile of weapons waiting to kill innocent citizens |
He is burying his head somewhere now, and he wishes he hadn't said "No matter how hard you try, you will still not change anybody's mind. We are not scared that some christian will wake up tomorrow and try to blow up his underwear. He will have to be disturbed by something else and as such religion will not be his motivation. it will simply be a moniker for him". |
@Fhemmy Your byline is "For me to know and you to find out" Can we be true to your byline here and "try and find out" Propaganda indeed? Is it the bible verses that are propaganda? Or is the American government doing propaganda against its people? In a highly litigious country? Against a very powerful, vocal and super rich adversary? http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100330/ap_on_re_us/us_fbi_raids http://news. bbc.co.uk/ 1/hi/world/ americas/ 8593975.stm Typical of Christians, they will bury their heads in the sand and show an holier-than-thou attitude. Little wonder that the two greatest thieves of our time, Akingbola and Cecila Ibru are leading members of the Redeem Church of Christ Maybe that also explains Adeboye's flamboyant lifestyle, living off the wealth of poor Nigerians. It is good to believe, but in the face of hard facts, one should use at least one eye and confront reality |
I was reading the bible and I saw this quote. Please someone explain I thought Christianity was all about peace and love. These verse preach and encourage bloodshed [b] But he himself turned back at the idols near Gilgal and said, “I have a secret message for you, O king.” And he commanded, “Silence.” And all his attendants went out from his presence. 20 And Ehud came to him as he was sitting alone in his cool roof chamber. And Ehud said, “I have a message from God for you.” And he arose from his seat. 21 And Ehud reached with his left hand, took the sword from his right thigh, and thrust it into his belly. 22 And the hilt also went in after the blade, and the fat closed over the blade, for he did not pull the sword out of his belly; and the dung came out. 23 Then Ehud went out into the porch [1] and closed the doors of the roof chamber behind him and locked them. 24 When he had gone, the servants came, and when they saw that the doors of the roof chamber were locked, they thought, “Surely he is relieving himself in the closet of the cool chamber.” 25 And they waited till they were embarrassed. But when he still did not open the doors of the roof chamber, they took the key and opened them, and there lay their lord dead on the floor.[/b] |
Of course they are Christians fanatic and potential mass murderers, arent all Christians like this; they preach love for all but stab you behind the back once they have an opportunity to do so. All truth seekers should check this site out http://hutaree.com/ Well I am not surprise or didnt your Apostle Paul say that if by lying and I guide people to kingdom of God who then can accuse me of lying |
@Nimshi Can you instruct me about this from the Quran? If you're able to, I'll take a look.We dont need to bring evidence, you are the one establishing something so the so you are supposed to bring proof for what you are establishing. |
@Nimshi I really pray you are not shi'a because if you are Shi'a then I inform by brothers on this thread that Mut'ah is least of his problem, compared to the other problems he will have mut'ah is just a piece of cake. But the reason behind my earlier post is to inform everyone on this thread that there shi'as alive and they are the only one who we know still believe in Mut'ah. Let it be know that there are some issues in Islam which were fiqh issues before but over the centuries have become consensus amongst the scholars of the Ahlul-Sunnah Wal Jamaa'h(Salafi Scholars) and dividers between the people on the straight path of the Muhammed (Peace and Blessing Allah be on him) and the party of misguidance hence issues like wiping over the feet, like revolting against leaders, mut'ah etc have become issues of the creed such that if anyone in any other generation bring up the issue then immediately he will be warned against. And muta'h being one them, and let no one come here and try to compare the issue of anal sex with that Muta'h. There is a valid difference of opinions amongst the earlier scholars on the issue of anal sex, It is a popular opinion of Imam Malik and amongst the recent scholars who also have this opinion is Shaik Amroo Abd Munim Saleem so anal sex is different . Muta'h was later abrogated by the Prophet though it was permissible at a time. If we check Usool- Sunnah of Imam Ahmad, Aqeedatul At-Taahawiyah of Imam At-tahawiyah any of the earlier books of Aqeedah we will see what they say about Muta'h. Please if we have a shi'a on this Nairaland the I believe we are in trouble because the a great fitnah to muslims. Below are some quotes from the earlier scholars on the shi'as Imam Ash-Shafi'i: On one occasion Imam Shafi'ee said concerning the Shia, "I have not seen among the heretics a people more famous for falsehood than the Raafidi* Shia." and on another occasion he said; "Narrate knowledge from everyone you meet except for the Raafidi* Shia, because they invent ahaadeeth and adopt them as part of their religion." (Minhaj as-Sunnah an-Nabawiyyah) Imam Malik: Once when asked about the Raafidi Shia, Imam Malik said; "Do not speak to them or narrate from them, for surely they are liars." During one of Imam Malik's classes, it was mentioned that the raafidi Shia curse the sahaba. Imam Malik recited the verse, "Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah and those with him are harsh with the disbelievers and gentle among themselves. So that the disbelievers may become enraged with them." (48:29) He then said, "Whoever becomes enraged when the Sahâbah are mentioned is the one about whom the verse speaks." (Tafseer al-Qurtubi) Imam Ibn al- MUBAARAK: was reported to have said "Religion is gained from Ahl al-Hadeeth, scholastic theology, and crafty exemptions from religious ordinances from Ahl-ar-ray and lies from the Raafidite Shi'ites.The funniest thing that they will never admit they are shi'a until they are have caused havoc amongst muslims I have some questions for @Nimshi So I ask @Nimshi are you Shi'a? Dont be scared just answer at least we cant see ourselves phsically so there is no need for Taqiyah. @Nimshi Tell me al you know about Umar the 2nd Caliph? Please say the truth |
[center]CONCEPT OF MUT'UH[/center][b][/b] |
The Ruling Concerning Multiple Groups |
just typical Nigerian or a skillful dodging Answer a question with another questions!!!! |
@babs787 Please can you name the Albanni books used in TMC gatherings? Am interested and would like to know, since you raised the topic. |
THE REASONS FOR THE WEAKNESS OF THE MUSLIM UMMAH The scholars have listed many reasons for the weakness of the Muslim Ummah. They are all aware however, or at least some of them are aware, that the Prophet (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) compiled these reasons in one sentence, in an authentic hadeeth when he (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) said: "The nations will soon gather up and call upon each other to gather up against you just as the diners call upon each other to the dining plate." Someone asked: 'Is it because of our little numbers at that time?' The Messenger of Allaah (sallAllaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) said: "Certainly not, in fact, you would be numerous, but you would be like the foam of the ocean. And certainly Allaah would remove the fear of you from the hearts of your enemies, and He would certainly cast weakness into your hearts." Someone asked: 'What is this weakness?' He (sallAllaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) replied: "Love for the worldly life and hatred for death." [13] Indeed the Messenger of Allaah (sallAllaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) was correct, because every Muslim in his right mind can see that the love of this world is the root of all evil and it is the reason behind all wrongdoings and calamities. Why not? When it is that this is drives man to be miserly and covetous with regards to wealth and person, with which we strive in the Path of Allaah - by spending the wealth that is dear to us and by sacrificing our person which is even dearer than the wealth. This is why the Messenger of Allaah (sallAllaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) said: "…Beware of covetousness, for indeed covetousness destroyed those before you by causing them to spill the blood of each other and to make unlawful things lawful." [14] As has been mentioned in many of the books of the Sunnah, among them Saheeh Muslim. I must take this opportunity here to mention, that the making of unlawful things lawful is of two natures. The first is the indulgence in unlawful acts whilst being fully aware of their unlawfulness. This is visibly present among the Muslims today in all of its forms and types. Even the greatest of all sins, Shirk (the association of partners with Allaah and the worship of others besides Allaah) is clearly apparent in some societies and in some personalities who call upon other than Allaah in times of distress, seek other than the relief of Allaah from hardships and sacrifice to other than Allaah. There are even others who swear by other than Allaah. All of these things are considered Shirk and they are forms of Shirk which are widespread today amongst the Muslims. Most people however, and I would not say most of the common folk, but most of the learned, are not concentrating upon warning the people from these forms of Shirk and idolatry. These are the greatest of all sins, as has been mentioned in an authentic hadeeth, which states that among the greatest of sins are Shirk, murder, being unkind to parents and interest (ribaa). [15] And if you only knew ribaa, since it has become so widespread today due to the establishment of what are known today as "Banks". In addition, among the major sins is the drinking of alcohol, the women displaying themselves, the building of mosques on gravesites and many, many more. The second category of unlawful acts is of two further types: That is which one indulges without knowing its ruling or that it is unlawful. This, without a doubt, is an evil which is widespread amongst many Muslims. That in which one indulges by devising tricks to make unlawful acts lawful, just as the Jews fraudulently caught the fish, as has been mentioned in the Qur’aan - as is well-known to all - and just as their trickery in making use of fat was prohibited for them, we gather from the words of the Messenger of Allaah (sallAllaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) in an authentic hadeeth: "Allaah has cursed the Jews, for the fat (of animals) was made unlawful for them, yet they melted it. Sold it and benefited from its receipts. And indeed if Allaah makes the eating of anything unlawful for a people, he also makes unlawful the receipts from its sale." [16] This hadeeth, in spite of it being from amongst the very important Ahaadeeth, is among the Ahaadeeth that is rarely heard upon the tongues of those giving sermons and admonitions. It is a hadeeth that would save the Muslims from following into what the Jews before fell into. In addition, the Messenger of Allaah (sallAllaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) warned against falling into what the Jews fell into, in an authentic hadeeth reported by al-Bukhaaree among others, in his book of authentic Ahaadeeth from the hadeeth narrated by Aboo Sa’eed al-Khudree (radiyallaahu ’anhu) [17] who said: 'The Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) said: "You would most certainly follow the ways of those who preceded you so completely and so literally, that even if they enter the hole of a Dabb (mastigure or lizard), you too would enter into it behind them." We said: 'O Messenger of Allaah, the Jews and the Christians?' He said: "Whom else?" [18] Thus I say as a warning, that this type of indulgence in unlawful acts through the slightest means of trickery, has happened to the Muslims in some of their transactions and contracts. One of the most common of these practices is what is known as the marriage of legitimacy (nikaahut-tahleel). The doer of which is cursed in the authentic Sunnah by the statement of the Messenger of Allaah (sallAllaahu ’alayhi wa sallam): "Allaah has cursed the legitimizer and the one for whom the woman was legitimized." [19] Even with this being the case, there are still from 'experts' in fiqh (Islaamic jurisprudence) who permit this marriage of legitimacy, even though the Prophet (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) has cursed those who indulge in it as you have just heard. Among the things which are also widespread today, is the selling of goods on installments at an increase upon the cash price (i.e. a higher purchase). Among them also is the dealing in ’eenah transactions. [20] which is widespread in some Islaamic countries, I am sorry to say. The time however, does not permit for me to expound on all these points mentioned here. I just wanted to remind the brothers of a hadeeth that is appropriate for this occasion. This is the statement of the Messenger of Allaah (sallAllaahu ’alayhi wa sallam): "If you indulge in ’eenah transactions when trading and you start to hold on to the tails of cattle and you are satisfied to concentrate only upon farming and you have abandoned Jihaad in the Cause of Allaah, Allaah will cast a humiliation upon you which would never be lifted from you until you return to your Religion." [21] In this Hadeeth therefore, there is an extremely clear picture of the poisons and the ills which will result from the love of this world and that it is the rat-race and the concentration upon taking all necessary steps to accumulate wealth, that has resulted in what is now the present state of the Muslims. The Messenger of Allaah (sallAllaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) mentioned the abandonment of Jihaad with the evil of ’eenah transactions, the holding fast to the tails of cattle and the contraction only upon farming. This abandonment of Jihaad has now become a commonplace today, encompassing all Arab and Muslim countries without exception. This is so, despite their having in their possession the means to wage Jihaad, which may not be available to the eager Muslim youths in order that they may defend their countries, their lands, even their honour and dignity. The only natural result - the Sunnah of Allaah - and you will find no replacement for the Sunnah of Allaah, due to their falling into all sorts of contradictions and their making lawful what Allaah has made unlawful. So it is for Allaah to cast a great humiliation and degradation upon them. This humiliation which we see has taken control of all the Muslim countries. Even if they seem free upon the surface, in fact they cannot move or act as the Book of their Lord and the Sunnah of their Prophet (sallAllaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) direct them to. For example, it has been mentioned in an authentic hadeeth: "Fight the polytheists (mushrikeen) with your wealth, tongues and persons." [22] We have now discarded Jihaad with our persons and resorted only to Jihaad with our wealth due to its prevalence amongst us and to Jihaad with our tongues due to the ease of doing so. As for Jihaad with our persons, this has become - unfortunately - among has the means. This is why the Prophet (sallAllaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) in this authentic hadeeth described both the ills and the cure for these illnesses. For he mentioned some examples of the ills which would befall the Muslims at the beginning of the hadeeth, then at the end he gave the cure. He said: "He would not remove it from you until you return to your Religion." This cure is the only remedy for the Muslims if they want to retrieve their strength, pride and honour and if they want Allaah to make them superior in the land, just as He made those before them superior in the land. This is why the Messenger of Allaah (sallAllaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) said: "Give glad tidings to this Ummah, that it would rise up and attain dominance in the land. Whoever therefore, does an act for the Hereafter for worldly benefit, he has no portion in the Hereafter." [23] The words of the Messenger of Allaah (sallAllaahu ’alayhi wa sallam): "…until you return to your Religion." Gives me the opportunity to introduce the last part of the question for this Muslim nation which has been plagued with a humiliation and degradation which has never befallen it before. Allaah the Exalted says: "That is because Allaah will never change a grace which he has bestowed upon a people until they change what is in their own selves." [Sooratul An’aam 6:53] What then is the reason for the changing of the blessings of strength from Allaah and the honour and superiority in the land which were bestowed upon the Muslims before? The reason is that we have changed the blessings of Allaah. We have replaced them and have taken to worldly strives. We have also abandoned Jihaad in the Path of Allaah. Therefore, the logical result of all this is that if a Muslim does not help the cause of Allaah, he in return would not receive the Help of Allaah as is stated in the Words of Allaah: "If you help Allaah, He will help you." [Soorah Muhammad 47:7] I must pause here to explain. Allaah has placed upon the tongue of his Messenger (sallAllaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) that cure for this chronic disease which has befallen the Muslims in all of the Islaamic lands. That cure is to return to their Religion which is Islaam as you all know and as Allaah explains: "…And whoever seeks a religion other than Islaam, it will never be accepted of him and in the Hereafter, he will be one of the losers." [Soorah Aali-‘Imraan 3:85] And as He mentioned in another statement: "This day I have completed your Religion and completed my favours upon you and I have chosen for you Islaam as your Religion." [Sooratul-Maa’idah 5:3] It pleases me here to take the opportunity to explain what the Imaam, ash-Shaatibee (rahimahullaah) said in his great book called 'al-I’tisaam' when mentioning what Imaam Maalik [24] said: "Whoever introduces an innovation into Islaam and thinks that it is good, then he has indeed claimed that Muhammad (sallAllaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) was deceitful in conveying his message". Read if you like the Words of Allaah: "This day I have completed your Religion and completed my favours upon you and I have chosen for you Islaam as your Religion." [Sooratul-Maa‘idah 5:3] The last of this Ummah would not be restored and put in order, except by what put the first of this Ummah in order. Whatever was not part of the Religion at that time, cannot be part of the Religion today." [25] Then Imaam ash-Shaatibee said: "We used to use this authentic narration from Imaam Maalik - The Imaam of Daarul-Hijrah (Madeenah) - as evidence to prove that it is not permissible for any Muslim to introduce into the Religion something new, however small or insignificant it may be, whether it be in character, worship or belief. We used to use this tradition as evidence, relying upon the Noble Qur'ânic statement which states that Allaah completed his favours upon us by the completion of our Religion which is al-Islaam." [26] So what about us today? We have gone so far away from Islaam - not only in those things that we call the Sunnah, which is contradicted by Innovation. In fact, we have drifted totally away from Islaam. We have drifted away, not only in the things which some may call 'secondary matters, not important', but we have drifted away from the Islaam which Allaah has ordained for us as our Religion. We have strayed in our legal judgements, our thoughts, even in our beliefs. If however, we sincerely want to administer this cure that Allaah has prescribed for us upon the tongue of His Prophet (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam), which is to return to the Religion, then how should we understand this Religion? So there are two understandings known to the scholars, who are aware of the differences existing between the past and present day scholars. There are two schools of thought - one affiliated to the Salaf and the other affiliated to the khalaf. Those affiliated to the khalaf admit that the way of the Salaf is sounder and safer. They claim however, that the way of the khalaf is greater in knowledge and wiser. So what do you think? Shall we take our beliefs firstly from the Righteous Salaf or from those who admit that the way of the Salaf is sounder, but that their way is more knowledgeable and wiser? Without a doubt, it is clear from the evidences we mentioned previously that it is compulsory for us in these times to align firstly our beliefs to that of the Salafus-Saalih. We must also return to what they were upon in legal matters and in matters of character and deportment. We must return to the Salaf in these matters. The Salaf, who did not see any other recourse in times of dispute, except to depend upon the Qur‘aan and the Sunnah. Allaah states in the Qur‘aan: "And by your Lord! They do not truly believe, until they seek your judgement (O Muhammad) in whatever they dispute about. They do not find any reservations in their hearts about your judgement, but instead submit totally to it." [Sooratun-Nisaa‘ 4:65] Today unfortunately, we have not seen those groups and parties agreeing with us in administering this cure. For there is no remedy for the Muslims to return to their pride and strength, except through their return to their Religion. This point is a point about which no one from amongst the Muslims disputes. This is so regardless of his alliances and regardless of his affiliation to a particular group, or regardless of his particular school of law. The dispute arises however, in the understanding of the Religion. As I have mentioned before, there are two schools of thought, that of the Salaf and that of the khalaf. The Salaf never disputed nor disagreed about the fundamentals of the Religion. They never disputed that fact that in times of dispute, the matter is referred to the Qur‘aan and the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam). Therefore, they sort their judgements from these two sources and they submitted totally to these judgements as we have mentioned in the previous Qur‘aanic verse. Differences occurred amongst them primarily due to what I have mentioned previously, which is that a Hadeeth of the Prophet (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) may not have reached one of them. So he may act as he sees fit based upon the knowledge that he has. Thus he may fall into unintentional error at times. This is why the Prophet (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) said in an authentic hadeeth: "If an arbitrator gives a verdict based upon his personal reasoning (ijtihaad) and he is correct in that verdict, then he receives two rewards. And if he makes an error then he receives only one." [27] Therefore it is compulsory that the Muslims return back to this principle about which there should be no difference of opinion. I mean the principle of following the Qur‘aan and the Sunnah upon the understanding of the righteous predecessors. If we agree to return to this system, and use it as our course of action and methodology and if we agree to cooperate, firstly in understanding this methodology and secondly upon the implementation of it, then there comes something of extreme importance which is the summary of the answer to the question about the path to progress. It is compulsory upon all of the Muslims today to first have a proper understanding of their Religion, then to implement it correctly, each person according to his ability. The rulers are different from the ruled. The rulers have the highest authority, while the authority of the ruled is limited. If both the rulers and the ruled take up their responsibility therefore, firstly understanding Islaam correctly, then secondly implementing this Islaam totally - each according to his ability, as I said before - I believe that one day the Believers will rejoice due to the victory to Allaah. I see many Islaamic Du’aat (callers to Islaam) who constantly call upon the governments to rule in accordance with what Allaah has sent down - and this is a genuine call without a doubt. For Allaah has said: "And whoever does not rule by what Allaah has revealed, then these are the disbelievers." [Sooratul-Maa‘idah 5:44] And in another statement: "…then these are the rebellious." [Sooratul-Maa’idah 5:47] And in yet another statement: "…such are the oppressors." [Sooratul-Maa’idah 5:45] It is true that the governments should rule by the implementation of Islaam and their constitutions, laws and upon their people. This is true and compulsory. However, we would like to remind those individuals who are calling to this statement, that they should not forget their own selves. As Allaah states: "O you who believe! Take care of your own selves, no harm can come to you from those who have gone astray if you follow right guidance." [Sooratul-Maa‘idah 5:105] So it is obligatory upon every Muslim to truly understand Islaam and enjoin it to the best of his ability upon himself and upon those whom he has responsibility and authority. So the Messenger of Allaah has said: "You are all guardians and responsible for your wards and things under your care." [28] The man therefore is a guardian and is responsible for his dependants. The woman is also responsible and a guardian over her dependants and so on. Some of the du’aat refer to this self-training by this statement which was made by one of them: 'Establish the Islaamic state in your heart and it will be established for you upon your land.' I repeat: 'Establish the Islaamic state in your heart and it will be established for you upon your land.' This statement pleases us much. However, we are not pleased with those who are affiliated with the one who advocated these words. This is because they do not pay much attention to it, nor do they place any importance upon its implementation. So doing that requires a great effort on their part. It requires that they return to the Qur‘aan and the Hadeeth of the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) as they were understood by our righteous predecessors. So I say that the return to the Religion - which is the remedy needed to cure what has befallen the Muslims today requires two things from us. I call them: at-Tasfiyah (Purification) at-Tarbiyah. When I say 'tasfiyah', I mean that it is incumbent upon the scholars or the learned who wish to implement the correct system of understanding Islaam as it was understood by the righteous predecessors, that they should all work towards cleansing this Islaam. Cleansing it from that which entered into it and of that which it has no part. Indeed it is as free of things as the wolf was from the blood of Ya‘qoob’s son [29] as they say. Then they should call to this. Whether it be in matters of belief (‘aqeedah), laws about which there are many differences of opinion, or character or behviour. Purification of the Religion must take place in all aspects of this Islaam that Allaah completed for us, as we mentioned previously, and which we re-emphasize with the Hadeeth of the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam): "I did not neglect anything by which you would draw closer to Allaah and keep far away from the Hellfire, except that I ordered you to do it. And I did not neglect anything which would keep you far away from Allaah and draw you closer to the Fire, except that I prevented you from doing it." [30] For those wishing to follow this correct path, something must be made clear. Many of the scholars of the past and the present are aware that a lot of things entered into the Sunnah, or which it has no part. This occurred even in the first century when some deviant sects started raising their voices and calling to that which contradicted the Qur’aan and the Sunnah by following their vain desires. One of the Khawaarij [31] for example, after being guided by Allaah to the Sunnah said: 'Look carefully at where you take your Religion, for if we liked something we used to make it a Hadeeth.' For this reason, Ibn Sireen said: "Pay attention to where you take your Religion from." [32] This statement has been reported as a hadeeth of the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam), but in fact, it is not a hadeeth, for the chain of narrators stops at Ibn Sireen. [33] This is also why some scholars of Hadeeth have said: "Al-Isnaad (the chain of narrators) is an essential part of the Religion. Had it not been for the Isnaad, anyone would have said whatever he wished." [34] This is a matter about which there is consensus amongst the scholars in theory. I know fully well what I mean when I say 'in theory.' That is because I must mention a bitter truth. In practice, the scholars did not pay much attention to this Isnaad as they should have done. Indeed only a small group of scholars paid attention to it. Some of them were: the Imaam, Ahmad Ibn Hanbal [35], the Imaam Yahyaa Ibn Ma‘een [36], ‘Alee Ibnul-Madeenee [37] and their students such as Imaam al-Bukhaaree [38] and Muslim [39] and others from amongst the scholars of Hadeeth, critics and those who gave character appraisals of the narrators of Hadeeth. This being the case, it follows that these are the ones upon whom one must rely in order to fulfill this task of purification of the Sunnah - to which we must return - after cleansing. The books of the Sunnah today are widely available. This is due to Allaah’s complete care and concern for the Muslim community - and in keeping with this promise - He mentions in the Qur’aan: "Verily, We have sent down the remembrance (dhikr) and surely We will preserve it." [Sooratul-Hijr 15:9] On this occasion I must make a point. This noble aayah, when it states that "We have sent down the Dhikr and we shall surely protect it." Some people who do not specialize in the Sunnah, nor do they give it much credit are of the wrong opinion that the protection granted here encompasses the Qur’aan only. Let me say, yes Allaah has mentioned the dhikr in this aayah, for He has promised to preserve the words and letters of the Qur’aan. He has however, guarded its meanings by the Sunnah of His Prophet (sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam). The true accomplishment of this purification in not possible therefore, except through the scholars of Hadeeth. Consequently, the understanding of the Qur’aan cannot be established, except through this purified Sunnah. If not, the Muslims will fall into what those before, like the groups other than the Saved Sect, fell into. This is because the Qur’aan is as ‘Umar Ibnul-Khattaab (radiyallaahu ‘anhu) said: "The Qur’aan can be interpreted in many different ways." This is why Allaah stated: "And We have sent down to you the remembrance (dhikr), so that you may explain to the people what has been sent down to them." [Sooratun-Nahl 16:44] We have sent down the Dhikr to you, O Muhammad, that you may explain to the people with your Sunnah, what has been sent down to them. This verse therefore, points to there being an explainer and a thing explained. The things explained in the revealed Qur’aan, which is referred to as the Dhikr and the explainer is the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) who is spoken to in this statement. There is no way for the Qur’aan to be understood except through the Sunnah - the authentic Sunnah. That is why the Prophet (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) warned against two things, in order to fulfill this explanation in a true and correct manner. The first thing against which he warned his followers against is the reporting of things of him that he did not say: "Whoever deliberately lies upon me, then surely let him occupy his seat in the Fire." In another narration it states: Whoever says about me something which I did not say, then surely let him occupy his seat in the Fire." [40] This is the first issue against which the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) warned his followers. The second issue which the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) brought to the attention of his followers is that it is obligatory to refer to the Sunnah just as one refers to the Qur’aan. That is why the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) said: "I certainly do not want to find any one of you reclining upon his couch and saying that when there comes to you a command that I gave or something which I have prohibited: 'I do not know. What we have found lawful in the Book of Allaah, we accept it as lawful and what we have found in it to be unlawful, we accept it as unlawful.'" [41] By combining these two issues which the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) warned, we would be able to understand the remedy which the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) prescribed as the cure for the ills that have befallen us from all sides. This is in reference to the first point about purification. 2 The second point to which we refer is training (tarbiyah) - after the scholars have done the necessary purification - and I have already explained what I mean by this. They must accompany this purification with training their families and their dependants in accordance with this pure Islaam. This is also so as not to become from amongst those who do not practice what they preach. Indeed our Lord has said: "O you who believe! Why do you say that which you do not do. Most hateful in the Sight of Allaah is that you say that which you do not do." [Sooratus-Saff 61:2-3] For this reason we see the severe warning to those who do not work according to their knowledge. For the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) has mentioned in a Hadeeth: "Give glad tidings to this Ummah that it would rise up and be established in the land. So whoever does a deed of the Hereafter for a worldly benefit, he has no portion in the Hereafter." [42] I want - at the conclusion of this speech - to explain that in the pathway to progress we must avoid the unlawful acts which you all know for certain like some of the examples we mentioned before, such as Shirk, murder, Ribaa and so on. I would like to discuss in particular, the first disease which the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) mentioned in the Hadeeth of ’eenah trading transactions. This is because this disease is widespread in some countries and most of the people are as the Lord of the worlds says: "They do not know…" ‘Eenah trading is a type of transaction that involves Ribaa which is unlawful. There are unfortunately some people who conduct this type of business upon the presumption that it is legally permissible. ‘Eenah trading is known to the scholars and it derives its name from ‘ayn meaning an object or actual thing. A person - Mr. B - comes to a car merchant - Mr. C - for example and inquires about then buys a car. He buys this car upon installments, not cash, - for, say twenty thousand dollars. Mr. B who has just purchased this car upon installments, then returns to the merchant - Mr. C - form whom he bought the car and offers to sell it for cash. Mr. C - realizes that Mr. B does not want a car, rather he wants money. So, the two men now agree upon a cash price for the car of - let’s say eighteen thousand dollars. Thus Mr. B who purchased the car for installments has just resold it for eighteen thousand dollars. Mr. B now goes away having a debt of twenty thousand dollars, when in fact he has only taken eighteen thousand dollars. This type of transaction in the ‘eenah trading that the Prophet (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) prohibited. So it is very clear to those who do not follow their vain desires or at least do not follow ‘eenah trading transactions. The true picture behind this type of transactions is that the borrower gets less than is recorded against him. There is no difference in this in which ribaa is disguised as trade and if he had gone and said: 'Lend me eighteen thousand dollars and I will give you back twenty thousand dollars. And why is this so? Because the borrower receives less cash than what he is required to repay. Then what is the difference between this and ‘eenah trading? This sale here was only used as a means of making ribaa permissible. This is exactly what the Prophet (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) warned us against in some hadeeths which were mentioned before. That is, his (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) prohibiting us from following in the footsteps of those who went before us. He singled out the Jews specifically. For Allaah made fat unlawful for them, as the Lord of the Worlds said in the Qur’aan: "Due to the wrongdoings of the Jews, we made them unlawful for them certain good things which had been previously made lawful for them." [Sooratun-Nisaa’ 4:160] We made unlawful for them some good things which had previously been made lawful for them. Amongst these good things which were made unlawful by this Qur’aanic injunction was fat - as was mentioned before in the Hadeeth: "Allaah has cursed the Jews, for the fat (of animals) was made unlawful for them, yet they melted it. Sold it and benefited from its receipts. And indeed if Allaah makes the eating of anything unlawful for a people, he also makes unlawful the receipts from its sale." [43] Here we find that the Jews have played with a legal ruling - the prohibition of eating fat. Allaah is all-Knowing and all-Wise. Due to the wrongdoings of the Jews, He made fat unlawful for them. When a Jew killed a fat sheep, he would only eat the red meat and throw away the fat in keeping with the injunction of Allaah. But they did not have patience with this legal ruling. So they devised a trick to make the fat lawful. They therefore melted the fat - this is what is meant by "so they disguised it". They melted it by placing it in pots and lighting fire below it. The fat therefore, took a different shape. The Shaytaan (devil) whispered to the Jews and made this act seem pleasing to them, that the fat had now changed from being fat. They full well knew that it was still fat in its nature, composition and taste. Then it was merely the shape that was changed - in order to eat it - as is said in some countries. By this change however, they made lawful what Allaah had made unlawful. The Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) did not relate to us this story of the Jews' making the fat lawful by this trick, nor did Allaah relate to us the story of the Jews and their trickery in catching fish on Saturday by trapping them in the bay as has been mentioned in some exegesis of the Qur’aan - Allaah and his Messenger (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) did not relate to us these stories as mere events in History, but indeed they related it for the very reason that is mentioned by Allaah in the Qur’aan: "Indeed in their stories there is a lesson for men of understanding." [Soorah Yoosuf 12:166] The lesson therefore, in these two stories - the story of the Jews and the fish and that of the Jews with the fat - is that we should not fall into what they fall into by devising tricks to get around what Allaah has prohibited. ‘Eenah transactions therefore, were made unlawful by the Prophet (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) so that the Muslims do not fall into devising tricks to get around the unlawfulness of ribaa - the picture of which is to take a loan of less than you are required to repay - by disguising it opnely behind the guise of sale as the Jews disguised the fat when they changed its shape. When I say these things however, I am aware that there are many scholars who have agreed that ’eenah trading transactions are unlawful. There are others too, who because they may not have heard the Hadeeth, or they do not think that it is an authentic Hadeeth - because the science of Hadeeth is not their field of specialization - they say this type of trading is permissible due to the use of the term 'trade' in these transactions. The people of knowledge, however know that the mere presence of the word 'trade' in this transaction does not make it trade, except that it is not unlawful legally. If we go back to the Hadeeth, we see that the Prophet (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) mentioned ’eenah trading as the first of a number of illnesses which would befall the Muslims. Amongst these illnesses are: the love of the worldly things and the abandonment of Jihaad in the cause of Allaah. We must therefore learn from this Hadeeth, and not fall into that against which we were warned, nor into those diseases which the Prophet (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) mentioned. That is, if we want to return to the position that our Lord wants for us. As He says: "But honour belongs to Allaah, His Messenger (Muhammad) and to the Believers." [Sooratul-Munaafiqoon 63:8] This is what I want to say in answer to these questions… We ask Allaah to allow us and you all to understand Islaam properly - in the light of the Qur’aan and the Sunnah and the understanding of the Salaf. And we ask Him to grant us all - both the rulers and the ruled - the success of working by this Islaam. I ask Allaah, for He is al-Ahad (the One), as-Samad (the Self-Sufficient). He who begets not, nor was begotten and there is none comparable to him - to accept our supplication and to give us victory over our enemies. Verily He is the all-Hearing, the One Able to Answer. And all praise is due to Allaah. Footnotes: [1] An authentic (saheeh) hadeeth is one in which the following conditions have been met: (1) There must be an unbroken chain of narrators leading back to the Prophet Muhammad (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam). (2) Each individual in the chain must be recognized as being a mature, trustworthy Muslim of sound mind and character. (3) Each of the narrators must be recognized as being perfectly accurate in his transmission of hadeeths. (4) The hadeeth must not contain something which contradicts something reported by someone who is more trustworthy. (5) There must not be anything in the hadeeth which may cause suspicion about its authenticity. [2] Aboo ‘Abdur Rahmaan ‘Abdullaah Ibn Mas’ood, was among the pioneers of Islaam and among the major companions of Prophet Muhammad (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) in both knowledge and stature. He made the hijrah to both Habashah and Madeenah and witnessed with the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam), the battles of Badr, ’Uhud, and al-Khandaq. He was also present at the Pledge of Allegiance at Ridwaan, among other great events. He was also one of the legal experts among the Companions. He died in the year 23H. [3] Ahmad (1/435, 465), an-Nisaa’ee (no. 184), ad-Daarimee (1/67-68). It was authenticated by Shaykh al-Albaanee in Sharhul-‘Aqeedatit-Tahaawiyyah (no. 810). [4] Related by at-Tirmidthee (no. 2641). It was authenticated by Shaykh al-Albaanee in Silsilatul-Ahaadeethus-Saheehah (no. 1348). [5] Related by al-Haythamee in Majma’uz-Zawaa‘id (1/189). It was authenticated by Shaykh al-Albaanee in Saheehul-Jaami‘ (52/9). [6] A hadeeth that is graded hasan is one in which the conditions of a saheeh hadeeth have been met, except that one of the narrators in the chain of narrators has not attained the level of perfect accuracy as the other narrators have. Thus, the hadeeth is demoted from the level of saheeh to that of hasan. [7] A hadeeth is considered to be mutawaatir when it has been narrated by such a large number of narrators, in each level of the chain of narrators, that common sense can tell that it was impossible for these individuals to have agreed upon the fabrication of a hadeeth. [8] Related by al-Bukhaaree (no. 2562). [9] ’Irbaadh Ibn Saariyah as-Sulamee, Aboo Najeeh, a famous Companion of the Prophet (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) from amongst the poor called Ahlus-Suffah. These were those poor Muslims who made the hijrah from Makkah to Madeenah. As they had no house of their own, they took up lodging at a sheltered portion of the Prophet’s Mosque. He was among those Companions about whom Allaah sent down the following aayah: "Nor (is there any blame) who came to you to be provided with mounts and when you said: 'I can find no mounts for you.' They turned back with their eyes overflowing with tears of grief, because they could not find anything to spend (for Jihaad)" [Sooratut-Tawbah 9:92] He reported a number of hadeeths from the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam), which are to be found in the more popular books of Hadeeth literature. [10] Related by Aboo Daawood (no. 4607) and by at-Tirmidthee (no. 2676). It was authenticated by Shaykh al-Albaanee in Irwaa’ul-Ghaleel (no. 2455). [11] The Sunnah involves the speech, actions and tacit approvals of the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam). [12] Those Muslims meeting the Companions of the Messenger of Allaah, but not meeting the Messenger (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) himself. [13] Related by Aboo Daawood (no. 4297) and in al-Mishkaat (3/1475). It was authenticated by Shaykh al-Albaanee in Silsilatul-Ahaadeethus-Saheehah (no. 957) and in Saheehul-Jaami’ (no. 8183). [14] Related by Muslim (8/18). [15] The text of the hadeeth is reported by al-Bukhaaree (8/7), Muslim (1/64) and by al-Haythamee in Majma’uz-Zawaa`id (4/130) and it is as follows: From Abee Hurayrah who said that the Prophet (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) said: "Avoid the seven great destructive sins." The people inquired: 'O Messenger of Allaah! What are they?' He said: "To join others in worship along with Allaah (shirk), sorcery, killing a person whose killing Allaah has prohibited, except in legal judgement, the indulgence in interest (ribaa), the unjust utilization of the wealth of the orphan, fleeing from the enemy at the time of fighting, falsely accusing chaste women of illegal sexual inercourse." [16] Related by al-Bukhaaree, Muslim and Aboo Daawood. It was authenticated by Shaykh al-Albaanee in Saheehul-Jaami’ (no. 5107). [17] He is Aboo Sa’eed Sa’d Ibn Maalik, he was from the tribe of al-Khazraj of Madeenah. He was too young to take part in the battle of ’Uhud, in which his father was martyred. He went on however, to participate in the battles which followed ’Uhud. He reported quite a number of hadeeths from the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam). He reputed to be the most knowledgeable Companion about the affairs of the other Companions of the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam). [18] Related by al-Bukhaaree (9/422). [19] Related by Aboo Daawood (2/555). It was authenticated by Shaykh al-Albaanee in Saheehul-Jaami‘ (no. 5101). [20] This term is explained later on by the Shaykh (hafidhahullaah). [21] Related by Aboo Daawood (no. 3462), it was authenticated by the shaykh (hafidhahullaah) in as-Saheehah (no. 11). [22] Related by Aboo Daawood (2/695) and authenticated by Shaykh al-Albaanee in al-Mishkaat (no. 3821) and in Saheehul-Jaami’ (3090). [23] Related by al-Bayhaqee and al-Haakim said that its chain of narrators was authentic. It has been authenticated by Shaykh al-Albaanee in Ahkaamul-Janaa`iz (no. 52) and in Saheehul-Jaami’ (no. 2825). [24] The famous Imaam to whom the Maalikee school of Islaamic law is attributed. He was renown for his knowledge and piety. He studied under more than nine-hundred scholars and did not give a single fatwaa (Islaamic verdict), until some seventy scholar attested to his ability to do so. He was born in the year 93H and died in the year 199H. May Allaah have mercy upon him. [25] Related in ash-Shifaa` of Qaadee `Iyyaadh (2/676). [26] al-I’tisaam (2/35) [27] Related by al-Bukhaaree (13/318) and Muslim (no. 1716). [28] Related by al-Bukhaaree (no. 730) and Muslim (no. 3396). [29] This is in reference to the story of Yoosuf (’alayhis salaam) in the Qur’aan. He was put into a well by his brothers who told his father, Ya’qoob (‘alayhis salaam) that a wolf had devoured Yoosuf. [30] Related in the Sunan of Imaam ash-Shaafi‘ee (1/14), and by al-Bayhaqee (7/76), and by al-Khateeb in al-Faqeeh wal-Mutafaqqih (1/93). See shaykh Saleem al-Hilaalee's introduction to his checking on Hidaayatus Sultaan for a proper checking of this hadeeth. [31] Khawaarij: Dissenters of dissidents who broke away from the rule of the Caliph, ‘Alee Ibn Abee Taalib. [32] Related in Sharh Saheeh Muslim (1/87) of Imaam an-Nawawee. [33] Muhammad Ibn Sireen al-Ansaaree of Basrah in ‘Iraaq. He was from amongst the taabi‘een and was known for his piety, competence and knowledge. He was strict upon related only the words of the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) instead of just their meanings. This great scholar died in the year 110H. [34] Related from Ibnul-Mubaarak in Sharaf Ashaabul-Hadeeth (1/15) with the checking of Aboo ‘Abdur-Rahmaan Mahmood. [35] Ahmad Ibn Muhammad Ibn Hanbal, the famous Imaam to which the Hanbalee school of law in Islaamic jurisprudence is attributed. He dies in the year 241H. [36] Yahyaa Ibn Ma‘een of Baghdaad was a famous Haafidh and competent scholar. He was considered to be the Imaam of the science of Jarh wat-Ta‘deel (Character and knowledge appraisal). He died in Madeenah in the year 133H at the age of about seventy. [37] ‘Alee Ibnul-Madeenee of Basrah, ‘Iraaq. He was another trustworthy and competent Imaam. He was considered to be the most knowledgeable person in Hadeeth of his day. Al-Bukhaaree said of him: "I never felt inferior in front of anyone except ‘Alee Ibnul-Madeenee." His shaykh and teacher, Ibn ‘Uyaynah said about him: "I used to learn more from him than he did from me." An-Nisaa’ee said about him: "It was as though Allaah created him for Hadeeth." This great scholar died in the year 134H, may Allaah have mercy upon him. [38] Muhammad Ibn Ismaa‘eel al-Bukhaaree was born in the year 191H in Bukhaaraa, Turkistan. He traveled to Makkah when he was sixteen years of age and he stayed in the Hijaaz (Makkah and Madeenah) for six years before moving onto some other places in search of knowledge. This he gained without a doubt, for he memorized two hundred thousand Hadeeths of the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam). He also met a number of scholars, amongst them were Imaam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal and ‘Alee Ibnul-Madeenee. His book of authentic Hadeeth is well-known to all. He died in the year 256H at the age of 62, may Allaah have mercy upon him. [39] Abul-Husayn Muslim Ibnul-Hajjaaj from Naysaaboor. He traveled extensively to gain knowledge and meet with a number of scholars. Among these scholars was Imaam Ahmad Ibn Hanbal. He wrote many books, the most popular of which is his Saheeh which is second only to Saheehul-Bukhaaree in authenticity. The Imaam, Muslim died in Naysaaboor, in the year 261H at the age of 57, may Allaah have mercy upon him. [40] Both of these narrations are reported by al-Bukhaaree (1/84) and by Aboo Daawood (3/1036). [41] Related by Ahmad (4/132) and Aboo Daawood (no. 5064) and by at-Tirmidthee (no. 3662). Shaykh Ahmad Shaakir gives a lengthy discussion upon it in his checking of ar-Risaalah (no. 19) by Imaam ash-Shaafi‘ee. [42] Related by al-Bayhaqee and al-Haakim said that its chain of narrators was authentic. It has been authenticated by Shaykh al-Albaanee in Ahkaamul-Janaa`iz (no. 52) and in Saheehul-Jaami’ (no. 2825). [43] Related by al-Bukhaaree, Muslim and Aboo Daawood. It was authenticated by Shaykh al-Albaanee in Saheehul-Jaami’ (no. 5107). |
Allaah the Glorified and Exalted states in His Noble Book: "And most of them believe not in Allaah, except that they attribute partners to him." [Soorah Yoosuf 12:106] The present state of the Ummah therefore, is as the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) spoke about it - even before we had seen what we had seen. In fact, even our forefathers saw what they saw - the division into sects and groups and the division of the Religion - contrary to the command of the Lord of the Worlds. "…And do not be from among the polytheists, those who have split up their Religion and become groups and sects, each group only being pleased with that which is with it." [Sooratur-Room 30:31-32] And in contradiction to Allaah’s command in another statement: "And verily, this is My Straight Path, so follow it and do not follow other paths, for they would separate you away from His Path." [Sooratul-An’aam 6:153] In addition, the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) has made it clear what is meant by these 'other paths’ in an authentic hadeeth [1] which depicts the division of the Muslims and the straying of a large number of them from the straight path. ’Abdullaah Ibn Mas’ood [2] (radiyallaahu ’anhu) said: "One day the Messenger of Allaah drew for us a straight line on the ground and said: 'This is the path of Allaah.' Then he drew a number of other lines on the right and the left of the straight line, and said: 'These are pathways, on the head of each path is a shaytaan calling people to it (himself).' Then he recited: "And verily this is My Path so follow it." [3] Indeed the Prophet (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) has explained in this hadeeth, that the path leading to Allaah is a single path. It is not as some of the Soofees say or claim, that the paths to Allaah are as numerous as breaths of the creatures, at least this is what they used to say long ago. Today however, the paths have changed to the emergence of groups and parties. Each of these groups being pleased only with that which is with them. This is so, even though all of the Muslims are aware of Allaah’s command: "And do not be from among the Polytheists, those who split their religion and became sects, each sect rejoicing in that which is with it." [Sooratur Room 30:31-32] And they are aware of the words of the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam): "The Jews have split and divided into seventy-one sects and the Christians have split and divided into seventy-two sects and my Ummah would split into seventy-three sects. All of these sects will be in the Fire except one." They said, "And which one is this o Messenger of Allaah?" He said: "The Jamaa’ah." [4] This is the most popular narration of this hadeeth, and it is an authentic narration. In another narrations which explains this one, the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam), when asked about the group that would be saved, said: "The one that adheres to what I and my Companions adhere to." [5] The Words of the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) in this second narration, which is graded as 'hasan' [6], as I have explained in some of my books, "What I and my Companions are adhering to." Defines the path which the group, that would be saved from the Fire must follow. This is the group which takes its methodology from that of the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) and his Companions. A point must be made here relating to the words of the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam), "…and my Companions." It is clear that, had the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) limited himself to saying: "What I am adhering to." It would have been sufficient as an answer. Due to great wisdom, however he went further and added: "…and my Companions." The wisdom behind this is that the Companions of the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) were all upon true guidance from their Lord. They learnt from the Revelation which was sent down upon the heart of their Prophet (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam), fresh and pure, just as it was revealed, and before its meanings were corrupted by foreign elements and vain desires which captured the hearts of some of those who came after them. This corruption is evident in the emergence of views and thoughts contradictory to that of the Companions of the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam). This is why he mentioned the Companions and mentioned them along with what he was upon; for he knew that they would be true followers of him. In addition, the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) has spoken in glowing terms about the generations immediately following his Companions. He said in an authentic hadeeth, rather a Mutawaatir hadeeth [7] in my view and as far as I know, resulting from my research and study of it: "The best of people are those of my generation…" Some people, when mentioning this hadeeth, say: "The best generation is my generation." I see it necessary to mention here - and indeed reminders benefit the believers - that the correct wording of the hadeeth is: "The best people…" "The best people are those of my generation, followed by those who came after them, followed by those who came after them." [8] These three generations therefore, they are the ones about whom the Prophet (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) attested to their benevolence. They too, are the ones referred to in the Qur`aanic verse: "And whosoever contradicts the Messenger, after receiving guidance, and follows other than the path of the Believers, we will leave him in the path which he has chosen and cast him into Hell - what an evil destination." [Sooratun-Nisaa’ 4:115] It was from the Words of Allaah: "And follow other than the path of the Believers." That the Prophet took his words in the previous hadeeth: "…and my Companions." The vocal point of the Qur`aanic verse is the same of that of the hadeeth. This too, provides clear proof that it is not permissible for any Muslim, in these later years, whosoever may be, to contradict or take other than the path of the Believers - because they were on upon clear guidance from their Lord. For this reason also, the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) mentioned some of his Companions as being of a higher calibre than others, referring to the Rightly-Guided Caliphs, as has been narrated in the hadeeth narrated ’Irbaadh Ibn Saariyah (radiyallaahu ’anhu) [9] who said: The Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) said: "I advise you all to fear Allaah and to listen to and obey (your leaders), even if he may be a slave from Habashah; For indeed, whoever from you is alive after I am gone will see many disputes and contradictions. You must therefore, stick to my Sunnah and the Sunnah of the Rightly-Guided Caliphs. Stick to it firmly and beware of innovations, for all new inventions are Bid’ah and all Bid’ah is a straying from the Right Path." [10] This is how the Messenger of Allaah (sallAllaahu ’alayhi wa sallam) mentioned in collaboration with his Sunnah [11], the Sunnah of the Rightly-Guided Caliphs. This is because of the same point, which we mentioned previously in the Qur'ânic verse and in the hadeeth about the Saved Group. From these three texts therefore, a system can be drawn. A system to which all Muslims in these times must adhere, and from which they must not be aloof, as we notice with so many of our contemporaries in the field of Da'wah to the Qur’aan and the Sunnah. They differ with us regarding our method of referring to the understanding of the Salaf from amongst the Companions, the taabi’een [12] and those who adhere to their principles in order for us to understand the Qur’aan and the Sunnah. This in fact, is what must be adopted by each Muslim as his method, in order that he does not stray from the path of the Believers. It is not sufficient therefore, to say today, 'We are upon the Qur’aan and the Sunnah.' Returning to the understanding of the venerable Salaf, however, is a guarantee and safeguard for the Muslims of today, against falling into what some of those who came after the Salaf fell into. These Muslims have differed severely, because they did not have easy access to the texts of the Sunnah, which is the explanation of the Qur’aan as the Lord of the Worlds says: "And We have sent down to you the remembrance (dhikr), so that you may explain to the people what has been sent down to them." [Sooratun-Nahl 16:44] This is the major reason for the differences amongst those who preceded, even among some of the diligent leaders from amongst the scholars, ascetics and pious Muslims. But there are other reasons for these differences. The main reason is the dominance of personal desires and views of some people even though they may have had some knowledge, even some piety and devotion. We say therefore, that there is no guarantee for the Muslims against falling into contradictions of the Qur’aan and the Sunnah, except to return to the methodology of the venerable Salaf. We sincerely believe that among the reasons for the present state of the Muslims is their differences in the interpretation of the texts from the Qur‘aan and the Sunnah, due to their dependence upon other than what we call the Salafee method. This is what we must know of the present state of the Muslims, in order to secure a return to what the Salaf of the Muslims were upon, which we see as vital for Allaah made them strong and gave them dominance in the land, as is known in the glorious history of Islaam. This is what comes to mind presently, concerning that part of the question, that is 'the present state of the Muslim Ummah, ' Before I proceed to speak about the reasons for the weakness of the Muslim Ummah, I would like to hear from you all, or at least from some of you, that I may be satisfied…are my words and my voice coming through clearly, by the Will of Allaah, that I may follow up my speech and my answer? "Very clearly of Shaykh of ours!" "May Allaah grant you glad tidings…" I now continue by the Will of Allaah By the Scholar of Hadeeth, Shaykh Muhammad Naasirud-Deen al-Albaanee Translated by Umar Salim |
WHO ARE SALAF? SALAF : Its meaning in the Arabic language is "Those who precede, have gone before". Its usage: A word used by the earliest scholars for "The first three generations of Muslims" and those who are upon their way in accordance with the Ahaadeeth of the Messenger Muhammad (sallAllaahu` alayhi wa sallam) which is reported in Saheeh al-Bukhaaree: The best of generations is my generation, then those that follow them, then those that follow them. The term SALAFEE is a relational adjective derived from the noun, SALAF, used in the phrase "as SALAF-as -saalih {The righteous fore fathers} to refer to the Sahâbah and early orthodox scholars. Hence a person who follows the Salafee is one who strictly adheres to Islaam as understood by the early generation of Islaamic Scholars. As-Sam'aanee "As-Salafi: this is an ascription to the Salaf and following their ways, in that which is related from them." lbn al-Atheer (rahimahullaah) (d.630H) said in al-Lubaab fee Tahdheebul-lnsaab (2/162), commenting upon the previous saying of as-Sam'aanee: "And a group were known by this ascription." So the meaning is: that the term Salafi, and its ascription to them, was a matter known in the time of Imaam as-Sam'aanee, or before him. Imaam Abu Haneefah (rahimahullaah) d. 769 C. E. (150 A. H.) said: "Adhere to the Athaar (narrations) and the Tareeqah (way) of the Salaf (Pious Predecessors) and beware of newly invented matters, for all of it is innovation." [Reported by As-Suyootee in Sawn al-Mantaq Wal -Kalaam, p. 32.] Al-Awzaa'ee (rahimahullaah) said Follow the footsteps of the SALAF . . . "By clinging to their way, holding on to their beliefs and understanding the Deen (religion) as they did, worshipping Allaah in His Oneness, upon the Authentic Sunnah of the Messenger Muhammad (sallallaahu`alaihiwasallam) in the manner of the Companions one is guaranteed success in this life and security from the Fire in the next life". Imaam al-Asbahaanee (d.535H) - (rahimahullaah) - said: "The sign of Ahlus-Sunnah is that they follow the Salafus-Saalih and abandon all that is innovated and newly introduced into the Deen." [Al-Hujjah fee Bayaanil Mahajjah 1/364] When questioned by his Companions about those who will be saved from the Fire, the Messenger Muhammad (sallAllaahu` alayhi wa sallam) replied: "They are those who are upon what I and my companions are upon." [Reported by at-Tirmidhee from Amr ibn al-Aas - classified as Hasan.] All the great scholars from the earliest to the later times have advised clinging to the way and methodology (Manhaj) of the SALAF and adherence to it as it is the only means of deliverance. Ibn Taymiyyah (Rahimahullaah) says: "There is no blame on the one who manifests, proclaims the way of the Salaf, who attaches himself to it and refers to it. Rather, it is obligatory to accept that from him by unanimous agreement (Ittifaaq), because the way of the Salaf is nothing but the Truth" (HAQQ) [From Majmoo al-Fataawaa, 4:149.] Imaam adh-Dhahabee (d.748H) - rahimahullaah - said: "It is authentically related from ad- Daaraqutnee that he said: There is nothing more despised by me than 'irnul-kalaam (innovated speech and rhetorics). I say: No person should ever enter into 'ilmul-kalaam, nor argumentation. Rather, he should be Salafee (a follower of the Salaf)." [Siyar 16/457] Additionally, The Messenger of Allaah (sallAllaahu` alayhi wa sallam) said: "Adhere to my Sunnah and the Sunnah of the Rightly Guided Caliphs, bite onto it with your molar teeth and beware of newly invented matters, for verily every innovation (Bid'ah) is a going astray." [Reported by Imam Ahmad in his Musnad and by Abu Dawood in his Sunan, by at-Tirmidhee in his Sunan, and by Ibn Majah in his Sunan. It is an Saheeh (Authentic) Ahaadeeth.] |
On the issue of Zakaatul Fitr, the most correct opinion is what I have posted earlier. Since this is an issue of Fiqh scholars disagreement abound to happen and this disagreement evidences available to a scholar when arriving at that decision. While a scholar may have come across a particular hadith and this will aid him in arriving at the right decision and another scholar may not know that particular hadith and that will affect his decision. If a scholar makes an Ijitihad and gets it wrong this doesnt make him a liar or somone who is weak in knowledge rather it shows that they are just human. What Allah and his messenger has commanded us is to follow evidence and not any particular scholar, so when a scholar arrives at a ruling we look at all the evidences he has brought how close his interpretation is close to the understanding of the Qu'raan and Sunnah and the under of the companions. Below are quotes from various scholars of Islam on this issue As Allah the most Most high says: "But no,by your Lord,they can have no faith,until they make you (O Muhammad (saw) judge in all disputes between them and find in the,selves no resistance against your decisions and accept (them) with full submission.[1]From the above what is clear that we only obligated to follow evidence brought by any scholar and the scholar or the scholar interpretation of the evidence, we must look at all the evidence and look at which is the best understanding amongst the various understanding brought by every scholars Istihsaan [viewing of something to be good] is one principle used by Imaam Abu Haneefah in arriving at an issue but all the other scholars including the three reamining Imaam see this principle as being baseless when we have a very clear and express command from the prophet. eg on this issue of Zakaatul Fitr, I read the arabic version of the hadith and it says "amaaran nabiy" i.e the prophet commanded us, and in usool fiqh scholars would say that "AL-amroo yufidu wujoob" i.e is a command points at the compulsion to that action this implies that if other than that action is done intentionally to disobey the command of the Messenger then this is will be punishable by Allah. Allaah warns against rejecting the word of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) (interpretation of the meaning): “… And let those who oppose the Messenger’s commandment (i.e., his Sunnah) (among the sects) beware, lest some fitnah (disbelief, trials, afflictions, etc.) befall them or a painful torment be inflicted on them.” [al-Noor 24:63]It also suffice us to say at this junction that on this issue of Zakaatu l Fitr there is no reported case of disagreement amongst the companions, all of the understood that what the prophet said as an express commanded and one not needing rational arguments. As for Imaam Abu Haneefah reason for arriving at a ruling like this what we can say is that may be he have not come across that particular hadiths which shows the prophet commanded us what to do when giving Zakaatul Fitr. The argument that money was not wide spread at time of the prophet and that was why he commanded food not money is not a correct argument because we know Zakaat proper which should be paid on wealth that has stayed for 1year and has reached Nisaab was an institition already in practice. So how did peopel pay Zakaat if not with money or ruling of cutting of Hand of a thief whic can only be carried out if someone steal something worth 4 dinar and above. As for cutting the hands we dont have any other base except this monetary one to value how a man's han should be chopped, so how can one say money was not well used in that time. Note this arguments of money is only traceable Sheik Yusuf Qaradaawi a contemporary scholar and not Imam Abu Haneefah who lived at a time close to the time of the prophet. And even if Imam Abu Haneefah said this we will not accept it from him because we his othe statements that express told us not to foolow his mistakes Abu Haneefah Nu'maan ibn Thaabit, whose companions have narrated from him various sayings and diverse warnings, all of them leading to one thing: the obligation to accept the Hadeeth, and to give up following the opinions of the imaams which contradict it:So my brother let us follow the sunnah and be a salafi, I rest my case here. |
Is it permissible to discharge Zakaatul-Fitr in money? - with mention of the evidences. Answer Zakaatul-Fitr is not permissible except (to be paid) from FOOD. And it is not allowed to discharge its value in money. This is because the Prophet made it obligatory (to be discharged) from a saa' of dates or a saa' of barley. Abu Sa'eed Al-Khudree said: "We used to discharge it (Zakaatul-Fitr) in the time of the Prophet as a saa' of FOOD, )".4 Therefore, it is not lawful for anyone to discharge Zakaatul-Fitr from money (dirhams) or clothing or household furnishings. Instead, that which is obligatory is to discharge it in what Allaah has made obligatory on the tongue of the Prophet . There is no consideration (weight) for the Istihsaan [viewing of something to be good, without basis from the legal sources of Qur'aan and Sunnah] of those of the people who viewed the giving of money as a good thing. The Law (Sharee'ah) does not follow (i.e. it is not secondary to) the opinions of people No, it (the Law) is from the One Who is Wise, Knowing -Allaah - The Mighty, The Glorious, The Most Knowing, The Most Wise. So, if that which has been made obligatory by the tongue of Muhammad is a saa' of food, then it is not permissible to bypass (skip over) that, no matter what our intellects make us to view as being good. Instead, it is a must that the human being question and suspect his intellect and views if it conflicts with, or contradicts, the law of Allaah Fatawa by Shaikh Muhammed ibn Salih al-Uthaymeen Is it permissible to discharge Zakaatul-Fitr from meat? Some of the desert dwellers don't have food to distribute for Zakaatul-Fitr, so is it permissible for them to slaughter some of their animals and distribute it to the poor? Answer This is not correct, because the Prophet made it obligatory to give one saa' of food, while meat is measured by weight (not by volume). Ibn Umar t said: "The Messenger of Allaah made obligatory the Zakaatul-Fitr as a saa' of dates or a saa' of barley, "5 And Abu Sa'eed al-Khudree t said: "We used to discharge it (Zakaatul-Fitr) in the lifetime of the Prophet as a saa' of food, and our food was dates, and barley, and raisins and cottage cheese " 6 For this reason, the strongest opinion of the sayings of the scholars is that Zakaatul-Fitr is not fulfilled by paying (distributing of) money, nor clothing, nor furnishings (furniture). There is no weight to the sayings of those who say that Zakaatul-Fitr is fulfilled by payment of money; this being so because as long as we have in front of us a text of the Prophet ( then there is no opinion (in the matter) after his, nor accepting as good what the intellect considers good while negating the Law (the Qur'aan and Sunnah). Allaah will not ask us about the opinion of so and so on the day of Resurrection. He will only question us about the saying of the Messenger, as in His (Allaah's) saying : "And (remember) the Day (Allaah) will call to them and say: what answer gave you to the Messengers?" 7 Just imagine yourself standing before Allaah on the day of Resurrection while it had been made obligatory on you to fulfill the payment of Zakaatul-Fitr from Food. Will it be possible, if you are asked on the day of Resurrection: How did you answer the Messenger of Allaah in reference to the obligation of this charity? Will it be possible for you to defend yourself and say: By Allaah! this is the opinion of so and so, and this is the opinion of such and such? The answer: No! and even if you said that, it would not benefit you (at all). The truth, without doubt, is that Zakaatul-Fitr is not accepted except from FOOD; and any food which is the staple food of the country fulfils this obligation. If you see the opinions of the scholars in this issue, you will see that they are on two extremes and one in the middle. One (extreme) side says: Pay it (Zakaatul-Fitr) from food or pay it from cash (money). The other (extreme) side says: Don't pay it from money, and don't pay it from food except five types only, that is : wheat, dates, barley, raisins, cottage cheese. These two opinions are the extreme opposite of each other. As for the middle opinion, it says : Pay it (Zakaatul-Fitr) from every food which the people are fed from, and not from that which the people are not fed from. So, pay it from wheat, dates, rice, pearl millets (dukhn), corn - and whatever is similar to that, - even to the extent if we accepted the idea that there is a place where the staple food of the people is meat, then we would pay it from meat. Based on this, it becomes clear that what the questioner mentioned about the people of the desert giving meat in place of (a saa' of those staple items which are normally given as) Zakaatul-Fitr, does not fulfill the obligation of Zakaatul-Fitr. Fatawa by Shaikh Muhammed ibn Salih al-Uthaymeen |
http://salafimanhaj.com/ebook.php?ebook=7 Pls download this book using this link, the book will surely clarify issues to the sincere Christian and strengthen the Muslims in faith |
Zakaat ul Fitr, has to be given in the form the local staple food material and not in money. There was money during the time of the prophet and they didnot deem it fit to give it to people in form of money so why do we have to start that now. Zakaat al-Fitr is food, not money, and it is to be given to needy Muslims only What do you give for zakatul fitr? Is it money or grain? and what about if you don`t know any body to be given? Is it permissable to give it to the masjid or a kaafir homeless, or kaair in general? Praise be to Allaah. Ibn ‘Umar (may Allaah be pleased with them both) said: “The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) made giving a saa’ of dates or a saa’ of barley as Zakaat al-Fitr an obligation for all Muslims, slave and free, male and female, young and old, and ordered that it should be given before the people went out to pray (Salaat al-Eid).” (Al-Bukhaari, 1503). Abu Sa’eed al-Khudri (may Allaah be pleased with him) said: “We used to pay as Zakaat al-Fitr a saa’ of food or a saa’ of barley (which was their food at that time) or a saa’ or dates or a saa’ of aqit (dried yoghurt) or a saa’ of raisins.” (1506) From this it is clear that Zakaat al-Fitr must be food, not money, so we must adhere to what has been recorded in the Sunnah. So give one saa’ of whatever is the staple food in your country, such as rice or wheat, for example, on behalf of yourself and each member of your household. (A saa’ is equivalent to approximately 3 kilograms). It is not permissible to give it to anyone except a needy Muslim. If you cannot find anyone in your own country, you can delegate someone else to give it on your behalf in another country. May Allaah help us and you to do the duties that He loves. And Allaah knows best. Islam Q&A Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid |
Rather than continue discussing with Dumb, Deaf and Blind people, Brothers Pls post you emaill addy so I can send you a book that totally refutes this ideology of Mulsims oppressing Africans m mAYBE BY THIS YOU GUYS CAN ACTUALLY BEATS THIS DEAF DUMB AND BLIND PEOPLE OF THIS THREAD aM SENDING IT O TO tUNDE BABS NOW |
Pls I dont have it, but mine is ishaqgbo@yahoo.co.uk. Will be expecting your mail Thanks |
He is threatening to divorce her if she does not work [b]I'm a young woman, converted to Islam - alhamdulillah. I'm married to a Muslim from Guinea. We doen't have children yet. I worked in a factory here in Europa. But they stoped the production and I losed the job. I'm happy about it, because I like to stay at home, I doen't want to work and the job was mixed. The problem is that my husband earns not a lot of money. His income is hardly enough for us, as life is very expensive here. And he has brothers in his county how are poor and need his help (his parents do not live anymore) . So he wants me to work. I was looking for a job that is not mixed. But I didn't finde one. I called a shaikh in Germany, which talked to my husband and explained him that it is my right to stay at home. My husband doesn't deny that but he sais that I must work as he doesn't earn a lot of money. Now he said to me: "f you don't work in one month I leave you (means: divorce)." My questions are: 1. Can I go to an interwiev where I have to talk to a woman and to her husband (for a job as babysitter) ? 2. Do I must work if I find a halal job ? 3. What do you advise me to do now ?.[/b] Praise be to Allaah. Firstly: The husband is obliged to spend on his family, pay the rent, cover food expenses and so on, and the wife is not obliged to provide any of that, even if she is working or is wealthy. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “Let the rich man spend according to his means” [al-Talaaq 65:7]. And the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Their rights over you are that you should provide for them and clothe them in a reasonable manner.” Narrated by Muslim (1218). And he (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said to Hind the wife of Abu Sufyaan: “Take [i.e., from his wealth] what is sufficient for you and your child on a reasonable basis.” Narrated by al-Bukhaari (5364). Secondly: The basic principle is that women should stay at home and not go out except for necessary purposes. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “And stay in your houses, and do not display yourselves like that of the times of ignorance” [al-Ahzaab 33:33]. Although this is addressed to the wives of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), the believing women are to follow them in that. It is addressed to the wives of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) as an honour to them due to their standing with the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), and because they are an example for the believing women. The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Woman is ‘awrah and when she goes out, the Shaytaan gets his hopes up. She is never closer to Allaah than when she is in the innermost part of her house,” Narrated by Ibn Hibbaan and Ibn Khuzaymah; classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in al-Silsilah al-Saheehah, 2688. And the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said regarding women’s prayer in the mosque: “Their houses are better for them.” Narrated by Abu Dawood (567) and classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh Abi Dawood. Thirdly: It is haraam for a woman to work in a place where she mixes with men, because of the evils and problems that result from that mixing for both men and women. She may work outside the home in a permissible job in which there is no mixing with men, subject to the following conditions: - That she needs to work - That the work is suited to women’s nature and suited to their femininity and physical constitution, such as working in medicine, nursing, teaching, sewing and so on. - That the work is in a place that is only for women, and there is no mixing with non-mahram men - That the woman adhere to proper shar’i hijab at work - That her work should not lead to her travelling without a mahram - That her going out to work does not involve her committing any haraam action, such as being alone with the driver, or wearing perfume where non-mahram men may smell it - That it does not lead to her neglecting a more important duty such as taking care of her house and looking after her husband and children. Shaykh Muhammad al-Saalih al-‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: The field of work for women is that a woman should work in areas that women specialize in, such as teaching girls, whether it is an administrative or teaching position, or she may work in her home, sewing clothes for women and the like. As for working in fields in which men specialize, it is not permissible for her to work where she will be required to mix with men, as this is a great fitnah which must be avoided. It must be noted that it is proven that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “I am not leaving behind after me any fitnah that is more harmful to men than women; the fitnah of the Children of Israel had to do with women.” A man must make his family avoid all areas and causes of fitnah in all circumstances. End quote from Fataawa al-Mar’ah al-Muslimah (2/981). Fourthly: There is nothing wrong with you working as a babysitter. If it is in your house there is no problem; if it is in the house of the family you are working for, it is essential that you avoid being alone with the father of the child and any other non-mahram men, and beware of other things that are haraam, such as looking, shaking hands, speaking to men unnecessarily. You are not obliged to work even though it is permissible, so long as your husband did not stipulate that in the marriage contract. If you are afraid that your husband will divorce you, then you have the choice between working and getting divorced, and in this case it is better for you to look for permissible work, and you will find it in sha Allaah, for the bitterness of having to work may be less than the bitterness of divorce. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “And whosoever fears Allaah and keeps his duty to Him, He will make a way for him to get out (from every difficulty). 3. And He will provide him from (sources) he never could imagine. And whosoever puts his trust in Allaah, then He will suffice him. Verily, Allaah will accomplish his purpose. Indeed Allaah has set a measure for all things” [al-Talaaq 65:2-3] We ask Allaah to set your affairs straight and to bring you together in obedience to Him. And Allaah knows best. Islam Q&A |
There is a man who is accustomed to telling lies ever since he was a child. He is trying to overcome this bad habit but he forgets and tells lies, then he asks Allaah’s forgiveness again. Does that have any effect on his fasting?. Praise be to Allaah. Al-Bukhaari (1903, 6057) narrated that Abu Hurayrah (may Allaah be pleased with him) said: The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Whoever does not give up false speech and acting upon it, and ignorance, Allaah has no need of him giving up his food and drink.” The phrase “false speech” includes lying, backbiting, spreading slander and bearing false witness, and every kind of speech that is haraam. Acting upon it means doing evil and immoral actions. See Tuhfat al-Ahwadhi. Ignorance means committing all kinds of sins. This was the view of al-Sindi in Haashiyat Ibn Maajah. Al-Haafiz said: With regard to the phrase “Allaah has no need of him giving up his food and drink”, Ibn Battaal said: This does not mean that he is to be told to stop fasting, rather it is a warning against false speech and the other things mentioned along with it… this is an indication that (his fast) is not accepted… what is meant is that a fast that is contaminated with falsehood is rejected and that a fast that is free of that is aceepted. Ibn al-‘Arabi said: This hadeeth implies that whoever does the things mentioned here will not be rewarded for his fast. What is meant is that the reward for fasting cannot outweigh the sin of false speech and the other things mentioned here. What is meant is that all sins have an effect on the fast and thus reduce the reward for fasting. The reward may be cancelled out altogether if there are too many sins. So you have to continue to strive against yourself until you give up this evil habit. Every time you sin you have to repent and seek forgiveness, for the one who repents from sin is like one who did not sin at all. May Allaah help us to do that which He loves and which pleases Him. Islam Q&A |
What is the ruling on one who eats or drinks out of forgetfulness during Ramadan? Praise be to Allaah. That does not matter and his fast is valid, because Allaah says at the end of Soorat al-Baqarah (interpretation of the meaning): “Our Lord! Punish us not if we forget or fall into error” [al-Baqarah 2:286] It was narrated in a saheeh report from the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) that Allaah said, “I have done that.” And it was narrated from Abu Hurayrah (may Allaah be pleased with him) that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Whoever forgets that he is fasting and eats or drinks, let him complete his fast, for the One Who fed him and gave him to drink was Allaah.” (Agreed upon). The same applies if he has intercourse because of forgetfulness; his fast is still valid according to the more correct of the two scholarly opinions, because of this aayah and this hadeeth, and because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Whoever breaks his fast in Ramadaan out of forgetfulness, he does not have to make that day up and he does not have to offer any expiation (kafaarah).” (Narrated and classed as saheeh by al-Haakim). This wording includes intercourse and other things that break the fast, if the fasting person does them because of forgetfulness. This is from the mercy, bounty and kindness of Allaah, for which we praise and thank Him. Majmoo’ Fataawa al-Shaykh Ibn Baaz, vol. 4, p. 193. |
It is permissible to cook whilst fasting Is it permisable to cook while fasting? It is permissible to cook whilst fasting. “It is OK for a person to taste the food during the day whilst fasting, if necessary, and his fast is still valid so long as he does not deliberately swallow anything of it.”. See Fataawa al-Lajnah al-Daa’imah, vol. 10, p. 332 |
About the TMC The arabs have a saying that Faqiru Shayin La Untihi i.e He who does not have something cannot give. This is my believe about the TMC, they do not have a proper grasp of the Quraan and Sunnah according to the understanding of the pious predeccessors. Its not just enough for any body to qoute Quraan or Hadith and subject to the undestanding of one person or group of people or society because all this group of people or person or even society are fallible but our pious predeccessors i.e the first three generation (Companions, tabiun and tabi tabiun) are infallible as group in understanding. Thats is the problem with the TMC, they interpert Quraan and Hadith based on societal affiliations and this is very wrong Islam. I agree some MSS are like TMC in believe and Aqeedah but not the MSS in Osun and Ondo axis especially IFE, IFE MSS is totally different Alhamdulilahi. I could talk deeper but I wont since I do not believe that we have to was our dirty Linen outside because we I know we have thread crashers like Queenisha and Davidlan about. But if push comes to shove I will speak, because I believe that people have warned about blind following any society. Allah didnot command us that and neither did the prophet. So brothers beware of any soceital affiliations that calls to blind following and doesnt teach the Quraan and Sunnah accrding to pious Predecessor |
1 2 (of 2 pages)