₦airaland Forum

ValeeLove:
I think the reason Brock is back is cos TKO won't let him retire. Especially now that they're money hungry they won't let you quit while your contract is still on, especially when you're paid a lot.

Fro5t:
Please tell me they did not have Asuka's farewell match at Backlash when it could've easily been on Mania.

ValeeLove:
you're absolutely correct I don't watch the show, for reasons like that. And I don't need to watch the show to know the funeral of a ginger bread man isn't entertaining for a sport-themed show. Or does WWE now operate in fiction and fantasy?

triplechoice:
I never asked your friend to provide evidence of summoning. I asked what would the evidence look like since he made a positive assertion.

If you can't see the difference no need to reply me again.

triplechoice:
You still don't get it. I never posted the video. I never claimed the man summoned bees. I'm a neutral bystander questioning the positive claim made by the person you're defending.

The person who posted the video didn't say "here is the evidence of summoning". He concluded based on belief. That's why the correct skeptical response should have been "where is the evidence "'?, not "No evidence of summoning" as if he knows what evidence of magically summoning bees looks like.

You can't claim "no evidence of stealing" if you don't know or have some idea of what stealing is. That has been my position.

Your sunrise analogy fails because you left me out. You reduced three roles ( the person who posted the video, your friend, me) to two ( claimant, doubter). I'm not the one who said "the man summoned bees. I'm the bystander asking the skeptic: "You say no evidence, so what would evidence look like if the man were to possess the power"? That's not a silly question. It's asking you to define your terms before declaring absence.

I never said the man summoned bees magically. So you and Jaephonix should stop inventing a position for me you can easily argue against.

ValeeLove:
But but but__it is entertaining.🤣🤣

samistry:
The minihausens and gingerbreadman feels like Vince behind the wheel.

ValeeLove:
You guys are eating good.
Hope Backlash was good at least?

ValeeLove:
No shade at Rollins, age beats everyone. But this is one reason to respect Ospreay.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/4425676374356393/

triplechoice:
Good. I suspected that.

So everyone, the Juju crowd , the coincidence crowd, and the Queen bee expert, Jaephonix and his friends, was just filling gaps with imagination. None of them knew it was AI generated.

That's the whole point: don't speak confidently about what you don't actually know until you have all the facts.

triplechoice:
You're projecting. I understand perfectly. You and the person you want to defend don't yet understand that asserting absence requires a definition of presence.

Your friend asserted. "no evidence of summoning". To make that assertion, he must know what evidence of summoning looks like. I asked him and he couldn't give a coherent answer, he kept changing his definition. That's my point. I never said the man summoned bees magically.

Let's assume the Uganda man has the power to summon bees, how would your friend know the exact way he summoned them? Whether verbally or through some hidden method, how could he conclude the man didn't summon them?

Some persons have offered a natural explanation: the man holding the Queen bee to summon the colony. If that is the case, is that not proof that he summoned them himself through natural means, contrary to his claim of "no evidence of summoning?


Since he is not sure, the correct response should have been "where is the evidence of summoning "? not "no evidence of summoning " as if he knows what the evidence would look like.

Now, can you tell me what the evidence of summoning would look like ?

triplechoice:
There's nothing in your post that cannot be understood. You made a positive claim: "No evidence for summoning bees ". So I asked what is the evidence of summoning bees since you claim to know it"?

Maybe you don't understand the implication of your own statement. Go and reread again.

dominique:
I'm a bit torn on this news when I saw it on my Google TL yesterday. On paper, he's an adult being inappropriate with a kid which is punishable by law. In reality, he's a kid himself who literally turned 21 yesterday (8th May) meaning a little over a year ago, he was still a teenager. I hope the law won't be too harsh on him .

Screenshots of the chats with the "minor". Pretty obvious that this was a covert operation but he wasn't smart enough to clock it

samistry:
They're making it so easy for Tony Khan 🤣

ValeeLove:
Deserved.

pu7pl3:
Link?

ValeeLove:
Ted Turner just died, have some decency.

pu7pl3:
That boy is good oh

samistry:
Why must Pedro Pascal be in every movie?

Sirmwill:
Am I still on Nairaland

What's with all these useless posts reaching front page

Is Tinubu now a mod on Nairaland?

samistry:

The sickos: “Sol Ruca has the dumbest finisher in wrestling.”

Also AEW: pic.twitter.com/zfok2x793k

— ☔️Jason G from the S.A.T.⛈️ (@Lifer_Oner) January 10, 2026

buygala:
Good one

Discontent must not be allowed to fester in our armed forces regardless of any conditions our gallant officers are serving under

Instead of addressing the issues causing discontent, we must prosecute the messenger who simply highlighted the issue.....

Yes, we must also close our eyes to the possibilty that it is this discontent and lack that makes soldiers abandon their positions and commanding officers during the heat of battle, leading to the recent surge of senior commanding officers' deaths...

Only thing we must know is that general discontent in the army leads to coup-de-tat and a disturbance in the comfortability of the army top brass..and that must never be allowed to happen..Our democracy and the comfort of the army top brass is sacrosanct, even at the expense of these gallant men....

samistry:
I'd have bet everything on New Day being WWE lifers. Bleep TKO

Fro5t:
At this point, e sure me die say Roman has his own personal creative team. His programs rarely miss, even when the rest of the product is struggling.

pu7pl3:
I found it funny

Fro5t:
Coolusername, you seen this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFJJA8Qeqz4?si=Qbzen23Y80dma4Le

pu7pl3:
😂😂😂😭😭😭


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9J8tnl5SJU?si=zocSimWbOxJk3QKX

samistry:
Imagine my suprise when Mr.Serious and no gimmicks was cosplaying for an efcc mugshot, not as a character but himself 🤣.