₦airaland Forum

pu7pl3:
Oba vs Brock should be a 3 series match

The Jacob story is probablyhim paying his dues like Jey did, doesnt make alot of sense but I'm going with it

"The Wolverine has neutered".

Jey calling him like a dog.

I don't use the term "buried" lightly but damn.

samistry:
🔥🔥🔥

WWE has to capitalise on Chad Gable's momentum. A feud against Penta for the IC title would be a nice way to bring the story full circle.

ValeeLove:
I'm asking a question and now its leading to insults. Make it clear if this is how you want to roll.

You didn't ask a question, you declared that it doesn't make sense

ValeeLove:
See as this one dey smile. Small Alexa is doing in 1 night what you couldn't do it 4 weeks!

"Small Alexa" is has been in the game for over a decade and is a 5-time 5-time 5-time 5-time 5-time women's world champion.

ValeeLove:
I know this is a WWE culture, maybe even a wrestling one, but AEW should be different and better.

Not about WWE?

Get in there and make it about WWE.

samistry:
Another sicko has been caught

Same people that had no problem with The Rizzler getting hit on by two grown women

samistry:
It was that good?

Study Cagematch and get back to me

Fro5t:
I might tune in for that Saquon solo run

He's far better than the others

Sami Zayn did nothing wrong

samistry:
How is a retired Mick who barely appears on TV a traitor? abi na e comments over Trump?

Wrestling fans can be so weird, man.

The whole country is getting terrormogged

samistry:
I'm not labelling him an abuser. Just trolling that ADR got in scuffles too. I hope it doesn't affect his push in AAA.

Hopefully not, if this report is true, the dude was being racist to Ludwig Kaiser's girlfriend

[quote author=samistry post=139470955]

MJF dijo que Malakai Black fue el mayor infractor de usar a AEW como un escalón para volver a WWE.

(@arielhelwani) pic.twitter.com/AXtMvD6yOk

— Fightful Español (@FightfulEspanol) May 19, 2026

have been talking out their necks about Malakai Black since he lost his job but he has never said a bad word about AEW, WWE, or any of his colleagues, as far as I know.

samistry:
Following the footsteps of Del Rio like a true luchador

Battery can be very different from domestic abuse, though

ValeeLove:
you've got no evidence and that's truth.

Neither do you. But what's more likely, an angle that WWE has already done a couple of times in the past or your headcanon about what is going on outside kayfabe.

ValeeLove:
I think the reason Brock is back is cos TKO won't let him retire. Especially now that they're money hungry they won't let you quit while your contract is still on, especially when you're paid a lot.

Lol, bro got worked

Fro5t:
Please tell me they did not have Asuka's farewell match at Backlash when it could've easily been on Mania.

More wrestling in a wrestling PLE? We don't do that here. Gotta make time for more ads

ValeeLove:
you're absolutely correct I don't watch the show, for reasons like that. And I don't need to watch the show to know the funeral of a ginger bread man isn't entertaining for a sport-themed show. Or does WWE now operate in fiction and fantasy?

It is literally fiction

triplechoice:
I never asked your friend to provide evidence of summoning. I asked what would the evidence look like since he made a positive assertion.

If you can't see the difference no need to reply me again.

If you can't point out the evidence that was provided, then you agree that you have also seen no evidence.

Anything else is a waste of time

triplechoice:
You still don't get it. I never posted the video. I never claimed the man summoned bees. I'm a neutral bystander questioning the positive claim made by the person you're defending.

The person who posted the video didn't say "here is the evidence of summoning". He concluded based on belief. That's why the correct skeptical response should have been "where is the evidence "'?, not "No evidence of summoning" as if he knows what evidence of magically summoning bees looks like.

You can't claim "no evidence of stealing" if you don't know or have some idea of what stealing is. That has been my position.

Your sunrise analogy fails because you left me out. You reduced three roles ( the person who posted the video, your friend, me) to two ( claimant, doubter). I'm not the one who said "the man summoned bees. I'm the bystander asking the skeptic: "You say no evidence, so what would evidence look like if the man were to possess the power"? That's not a silly question. It's asking you to define your terms before declaring absence.

I never said the man summoned bees magically. So you and Jaephonix should stop inventing a position for me you can easily argue against.

None of this changes the fact that no evidence was provided. If it was, show me, if it wasn't, then you typed all that for nothing

ValeeLove:
But but but__it is entertaining.🤣🤣

Some random dudes on the Internet are not going to tell me what I can or can't enjoy about wrestling. I enjoyed the segments, so did a lot of people too. Samistry didn't like it and we agreed to disagree.
You, on the other hand, are trying your best to find negative feedback to post here. To achieve what, exactly? Just give your own personal opinion—oh wait you can't because you don't even watch the show.

samistry:
The minihausens and gingerbreadman feels like Vince behind the wheel.

The good parts of Vince maybe. This is the goofy side of wrestling that I grew up watching

ValeeLove:
You guys are eating good.
Hope Backlash was good at least?

This was 10 times more entertaining than anything Hayes and Dragunov have done on the main roster.

Smackdown was very good. Backlash was ok. Things are fine. You and Triggered Wrestling can find something else to get triggered about

ValeeLove:
No shade at Rollins, age beats everyone. But this is one reason to respect Ospreay.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/4425676374356393/

Dude is less athletic than another dude who is like 10 years younger than him. More at 7.

triplechoice:
Good. I suspected that.

So everyone, the Juju crowd , the coincidence crowd, and the Queen bee expert, Jaephonix and his friends, was just filling gaps with imagination. None of them knew it was AI generated.

That's the whole point: don't speak confidently about what you don't actually know until you have all the facts.

Don't "all sides" this matter. Whether the video is AI generated or not, it is still true that there is no evidence that bees were summoned

triplechoice:
You're projecting. I understand perfectly. You and the person you want to defend don't yet understand that asserting absence requires a definition of presence.

Your friend asserted. "no evidence of summoning". To make that assertion, he must know what evidence of summoning looks like. I asked him and he couldn't give a coherent answer, he kept changing his definition. That's my point. I never said the man summoned bees magically.

Let's assume the Uganda man has the power to summon bees, how would your friend know the exact way he summoned them? Whether verbally or through some hidden method, how could he conclude the man didn't summon them?

Some persons have offered a natural explanation: the man holding the Queen bee to summon the colony. If that is the case, is that not proof that he summoned them himself through natural means, contrary to his claim of "no evidence of summoning?


Since he is not sure, the correct response should have been "where is the evidence of summoning "? not "no evidence of summoning " as if he knows what the evidence would look like.

Now, can you tell me what the evidence of summoning would look like ?

Whether we know how to summon bees or not is irrelevant. It is up to the person making the claim to provide the evidence that it happened. If there is no evidence that he summoned the bees, then the claim has nothing to stand on.

If I told you that I'm the one who makes the sun rise every morning and you tell me to provide evidence for that claim. It would be extremely silly for me to tell you to provide evidence for what it looks like to make the sun rise and then claim victory.

triplechoice:
There's nothing in your post that cannot be understood. You made a positive claim: "No evidence for summoning bees ". So I asked what is the evidence of summoning bees since you claim to know it"?

Maybe you don't understand the implication of your own statement. Go and reread again.

Post said the man summoned bees. The guy said there is no evidence of that. How does what you're saying relate to it? You clearly did not understand

dominique:
I'm a bit torn on this news when I saw it on my Google TL yesterday. On paper, he's an adult being inappropriate with a kid which is punishable by law. In reality, he's a kid himself who literally turned 21 yesterday (8th May) meaning a little over a year ago, he was still a teenager. I hope the law won't be too harsh on him .

Screenshots of the chats with the "minor". Pretty obvious that this was a covert operation but he wasn't smart enough to clock it

If he's a kid at 21 then imagine how much of a kid the 15-year-old he was creeping on is.

samistry:
They're making it so easy for Tony Khan 🤣

Invest in flippy fat dude stocks

ValeeLove:
Deserved.

90 days for almost killing someone smh.

pu7pl3:
Link?

Hope you have a reddit account

https://v.redd.it/mb4b15nb8mzg1/CMAF_720.mp4?source=fallback

ValeeLove:
Ted Turner just died, have some decency.

Where the bre—I mean best wrestle!