₦airaland Forum

pdppower:
Emilokan built Lagos, but when he got to Abuja cement finish.

You lack basic focus

This comment is very unrelated

Chidi, Learn how to creatively troll next time

Nigerian Police intelligence Unit is top-notch

I wonder how and why they fail in other important and bigger cases

Rip to her

Saw the news this morning

Jealousy and insecurity

What else would make a boyfriend to an Olympian do this to her


I hope he get punished eternally for this

NBA is an arm of LP

There's nothing interesting about them but i wouldnt go lower than 22 also

The age range is tight but there are still hundreds of them in that category, so na still good news as most Bank Graduate Trainees in Nigeria fall within that range


That way, you can bag a young and financially comfortable(potentially rich) lady for yourself. Una two go fit grow together

Saw the news this morning

Jealousy and insecurity

What else would make a boyfriend to an Olympian do this to her


I hope he get punished eternally for this

How do people even manage to see Amaka as the victim in any way

She's prettier than that SA clone

Male model to too dey get this kind publicity...Too bad

You are a terrible Dreamer
Be like dem dey bankroll am

Recall that on Tuesday, the President of Dangote Group, Aliko Dangote upon commencement of the petrol rollout announced that the price of the product would be determined by the Nigeria’s Federal Executive Council.

This already cancelled out what this guy is saying

Dangote never for once claim he had a say in this, plus whys this man attacking Dangote this way, is he pained?



I knw Kyari can be dubious but I would wanna assume that FEC being the fuel decider is all in a bid to ensure the diff in cost and selling price is profitable enough to Dangote and light enough to the consumers.

He should think

Is that for him to decide?

Does he have power to choose who to handover to outside INEC winner declaration?

Covert Tyrant

Exceptional cases
Was expecting to see 100 people crying.. Trash

Lionessza6. A good day for you to weep

You are being owned in your country by some minority Pig-skinned

IFECHIGCON:
Tinubu have milk that Lagos , but there problem is Omo nna

Naira20:
Tinubu is behind the debts of 2 states.

Lagos and....

.
Did you read the report? Does it correspond with your comments?


If people like you keep populating this section with your hate and dishonest comment, I guess who would have to look up other sections with highly intellectual individuals to debate with


It dropping really bad right here

This was gonna be the biggest worry

Other local refineries arent helping too

They should push their production capacity to the extreme abeg, cause if they all cant still meet up, we are still gonna experience queues and scarcity again

ShogunNoName:
What does this tell you about the Yoruba? something i have been saying here for long, that the Yoruba are the mastermind of tribalism in Nigeria. Me i don't hide it, i tell them even here in Edo state. They are wicked and very evil. If you see two tribes or family members having problem do your investigation, you will find out a Yoruba person is involved

Your opinion is useless
You're just one person

Tenshades:
Looks more like human skin...suspicious

How familiar are you with cooked human skin?

I couldn't have assumed this cause I don't know what it looks like

Certified Failures

Na Tinubu say make Obidients insult Ooni and Soyinka,right?

You can't insult the Ooni on whatever ground and expect us to be smiling with you


It's not a biggie tho...I curse Obi of Onitsha every morning and I feel pleased afterwards

That not even my problem

My biggest worry is why Nigerian women do not have options outside this country or maybe the continent(exceptions don't make the rules)

Those one to three cases we see on the internet are just exceptions... No other Nationalities yearn for them this much

Lordofalmajiri:
He knows bro , .. this one na political statement

Stop hallucinating...it makes u sound unenlightened

So I should believe your assumptions over his own words

Which school una go sef

Depends tho

This morning, I told one how i wanna convert one section of my apartment to a BDSM dungeon and shes telling me how helping fellow humans is better than satisfy sexual gratification


If its a guy, I will sure help but if na Flat mate matter with a lady and WW3 already begun outside, I still wouldnt bulge

Fubara should take the CSO job seriously in Rivers state

That state is beginning to share some common traits with SE states in terms of terrorism

Joe Ajaero is the most confused Nigerian, next to Kenneth Okonkwo


Man is an errand boy to that Agulu guy who's also an errand boy to AA
Spits

JessicaRabbit:
This is not the first time you've apologized to me on this issue. You see, apologies are like a form of currency. They can be devalued by inflation, and in this case, the inflation was your consistent history of dishonesty and evasion. So, if you really want to make amends, it's not just a matter of saying you're sorry. You have to show a willingness to learn and to change your behavior. Be more honest. Be more self-aware, and stop playing the victim, especially when you know you've made glaring mistakes.



You're just making me repeat myself. When I call out someone's behavior or arguments, I provide specific examples and explanations to support my claims. I don't simply throw around harsh words without basis. That's not a double standard. We call that "substantiation". Now contrast this with yourself where nearly all the claims you've made about me have been unfounded and assumptive. And you really need to learn what constitutes an ad hominem attack. "Sore loser" is not an ad hominem attack when used to describe someone who can't handle being corrected or challenged. It's a descriptive phrase for someone who can't take the heat and uses desperate tactics to deflect from the point whenever he has no more convincing arguments to make.

This exactly is why i called you those earlier names, I wont call you those again because you said they sounded disrespectful

You have a logical justification for everything and its worrying. Name-calling is wrong from whatever angle you use choose to look at it.
Your are really lucky that this argument is done via texting and i really dint have the strength to drag you that much, if not, I would have keep justifying every single name i called you with screenshot of multiple instances where it occured

You are also lucky this argument is taking place on a topic I have never debated/discussed with anyone before now and thats the reason why I feel overwhelmed most of the times

If it was my area of specialty, this whole thing would have been done since as i would have battered every single thing u throw at me

Its funny how i much of a monster i am elsewhere, only to get overpowered every single time I'm debating with you on your turf.


Stop justifying your wrongs. Some of us are too morally conscious to go all the way with you in doing same

What did you want to tell me?

I would like to have a proper conversation with you. I want to ask you questions and stop making random assumptions about you
The questions is sure gonna be just about these debates and diff topics I have seen you discussed in the past, Not personal

Like, my logical reasoning have so much developed in the last few days, To be honest, When I'm debating with people in other sections, Its now looking like I emulate your writing and debating technique(not grammatically o, just logically and I mean "its now hard for anyone to corner me in debates". Its like some dusts of your qualities are rubbing off on me and its just three days of consecutive back and forth

So can i ask the questions,ma

So who Boko Haram use their own dey emulate or no be the same religion again?


Mohamed isnt even from Nigeria, BH should stop acting like they understand Islam more

JessicaRabbit:
I didn't say you don't understand science. I said you don't understand how science works. There's a subtle difference. You're talking as if I said the former. Understanding science is about knowledge, but understanding how science works is about methodology. It's about grasping the principles and processes that guide scientific inquiry. The fact that I don't know your field of study is irrelevant. The point is, when discussing scientific matters, the methodology is what matters. It's not about your personal qualifications, but about the validity of the arguments presented. Now you've declared my pronouncement to be a fallacy, and I beg to differ with you on that claim. When I said you do not understand how science works, I'm making a hypothetical explanation for your viewpoint, based on the observed behavior of you dismissing evidence that doesn't align with your preconceptions. So basically you're wrong. And what do you even mean by "that's a fallacy"? You can't just make ambiguous accusations like that without backing it up with a solid demonstration of how I defaulted. What type of fallacy did I commit? Does it have a name? And can you sufficiently demonstrate how I committed said fallacy using a valid reference to the rules of logic?

Still ad hominem fallacy(you tryna undermine my perspective on science by implying that I don't understand the methodology)

Again, You can pass your point across without having to dismiss my understanding of scientific methodology. They dont have to coexist in one statement
I dont really want to go this route with you cause if i do, we might have to spend the whole year dragging minor issues and I dont want that


So, I will let this slide

No, this is not what I'm saying! You keep suggesting that just because we can't predict every single detail of a complex process like the origin of life, we must therefore resort to a "fictional story". You're misrepresenting my position by oversimplifying it and that's the very definition of a strawman fallacy. I'm not presenting any fictional story here. I'm discussing the overwhelming consensus among scientists based on decades of research and experimentation. The idea that life can arise through natural processes is not just a probability, it is a well-supported scientific theory. While there may be gaps in our understanding of specific details, the overall framework is firmly grounded in evidence. To say that because we can't predict every single step in a complex process, it must be fictional is like saying we don't understand how a car works because we can't explain the exact trajectory of every atom in the engine. The overarching principles are clear, even if the specifics are complex.



I'm not sure why you're having so much difficulty grasping this basic concept. The fact that we don't have complete knowledge about the early Earth's atmosphere doesn't mean we can't make informed, evidence-based hypotheses, and the conditions outside the test tubes looking different doesn't invalidate the experiment. Laboratory conditions are often controlled and simplified to isolate variables and better understand their effects. The goal isn't to perfectly replicate the exact conditions of the early Earth, but to test whether certain conditions could have led to the formation of life-building molecules.



This just makes me believe that you're not even confident in your intelligent design theory, because if you were, you would have just presented it directly. A truly compelling argument doesn't need a "soft landing". It doesn't need to throw shades at the alternatives. It stands on its own merits. You've essentially admitted, in this comment right here, that your strategy of criticizing Evolution, or Abiogenesis or both, was just a delaying tactic, and not a genuine attempt to disprove the scientific consensus. Can you appreciate how someone might view this as intellectual dishonesty?

Theres nothing dishonest here. If i had brought forward my evidences with my hundreds of supports from science and historical perspectives, you'd have still tackled it straightaway that theres nothing Intelligent about it, hence my reasons for trying to tow this path first

Plus, from my very first argument with you, my point was "In my search for the possible origin of life,I dumped my religious teachings to explore science teachings", and thats the reason why i talked about those Books from Dawkins and Hawkings, but then i realized there are too many probabilities in Science to my taken too seriously.

Whats the diff between believing probabilities and exercising faiths like xtians

This part of the conversation is boring. The question you highlighted was purely a rhetorical one. I'm really not interested in who you are or what your feelings are towards me or this discussion. Let's drop it already.

I cant o. Whats wrong in trying to affirm to you the few things I have noticed so far...Dont be too uptight. Hear me out and dont get bored out

So, Would u allow me move on to the next theory now(lets put Miller-Urey experiment behind), but I promise that if you could still find a way around this one, then I might just have to go the hard way by bringing up the intelligent design defense i have

Ma, can i go on with this, I have two other topics under it.
1)Mutation
2)Amazing design of the brain.

Dont chicken out please

We are doing all these just to taunt a country thats 10000 miles away from us, a Nation that doesnt even share boundaries with us. We are petty!


Chi-whatever is lucky, She's the only winner in all of these. It looks like a poorly written script that was excellently directed

Good for her

LadyExcellency:
All these ethnic chauvinists should stop instigating civil war by meddling in people's business. You we get what you want one day. Markets in this age are not tribal stool and should not be administered from such a hierarchy. The
local government council is

You write English full ground still turn the whole thing to tribal matters

All of u should rest abeg

If they so much wish to run their markets in some ancient ways, its their sole discretion and not even the FG can change that
Some of this is a matter of traders and market unionists. Dont give it a tribal undertone


Na so Onanuga dey tackle Obi that dey, Ohaneze run go put mouth. Something wey be ordinary political party matters