₦airaland Forum

atobs4real:
Evil man with evil soul

Not really
He's cuckold and thats his fetish

He should have calmly talked his wife into doing it with her eyes widely open instead of drugging her

I like Gumi. He's the most straightforward wururwuru scholar and religious leader in Nigeria

Dude calls a spade a spade and not a shovel. In a saner clime, he'd have been wasting away in the prison


How he comes up with these illogical defense is always funny to me

I will come back to taunt them when this thread has grown bigger than this

Coolsperm:
Yoruba Muslims wants to separate Yoruba Christina from their allies , so that the can easily islamise them with the help of the north

This shouldnt be your worry as long as you arent Yoruba

Let them worry about that




That aside, read the post again and look up your own comment. Do they correspond?

My dirst salary was after Sec school in 2010 and it was 10k

I be operator for one bottle water company then.

The gods are crazy


Amadioha no fit dodge bullet, if dem white people catch am, dem go use am teach other juju lesson



RIP to the dead... this is one of the most foolish way to die

He's always coming here... Shey we follow am sign deal?

JessicaRabbit:
Uhm...yes? That's how debate works. If you're going to make claims, then yes, I'll respond with counterarguments and possibly counter-evidence. Are you looking for an echo chamber where your views go unchallenged? If you're unable or unwilling to defend your own positions, then perhaps you shouldn't be debating at all.



Lol. Okay?



You conflated two separate concepts: Abiogenesis (the origin of life from non-living matter) and Evolution (the change in species over time). The Miller-Urey experiment addressed the former, not the latter. Once we have the building blocks of life, then we can discuss how they assembled into the first life forms and eventually evolved into complex organisms.



Now you're talking from two sides of your mouth. You initially claimed that the Miller-Urey experiment was a failure because it didn't demonstrate the evolution of complex cells from simple organisms. Now, you're saying that the experiment was actually about creating life from scratch, and that's a different topic altogether. And by the way, creating life from scratch is exactly what the experiment was trying to do -- but not in the sense of creating a fully formed organism. It was more about generating the raw materials necessary for life to emerge. So, you can't just dismiss the experiment's findings as irrelevant because they didn't achieve something they were never intended to achieve in the first place.



So? Even if the atmosphere was not entirely reducing, it's not like the presence of some oxygen would completely negate the results. The experiment still produced amino acids, didn't it? And subsequent experiments have refined the conditions to account for various possibilities. The experiment wasn't even meant to be an exact replica of the primordial conditions in the first place. It was just a demonstration of the possibility of spontaneous generation of amino acids.



I'm sorry but Miller's later speculation about the Earth's atmosphere doesn't invalidate the experiment's significance. The experiment sought to demonstrate the possibility of abiogenesis, not the certainty. The specific conditions on early Earth might have been different, but the experiment provided valuable insights into the potential chemical processes that could have led to the formation of organic molecules. Subsequent research has expanded upon the Miller-Urey experiment, exploring a wider range of atmospheric conditions and energy sources. While the exact composition of Earth's early atmosphere is still debated, these experiments have consistently shown that the building blocks of life can be formed under various conditions.



Well, this is probably why the experiment simulated an atmosphere without UV radiation, using a closed system that shielded the reactants from harmful radiation. And guess what? They still managed to synthesize amino acids! Besides you're incorrect in assuming that an atmosphere consisting of carbon dioxide and nitrogen wouldn't be supportive of creating building blocks for life. Scientists still propose various mechanisms for how life could have emerged despite these challenges. There have been theories about life beginning in deep-sea hydrothermal vents, where the chemistry is more favorable.



You're getting it all wrong. When you have well-supported hypotheses based on geological, experimental, and biological evidence for something, you can't continue to call it an "assumption". Scientists have studied the composition of ancient rocks and minerals, which suggest that the early Earth's atmosphere lacked significant amounts of oxygen. You also have the existence of stromatolites, which are layered structures created by ancient microbial communities, which also supports the idea of a reducing atmosphere. These microorganisms would have thrived in an environment with minimal oxygen levels.



They weren't trying to simulate an entire universe though. The experiment was just a simplified model to test a specific hypothesis: whether organic molecules could form under conditions believed to exist on early Earth. The scientist's role in the experiment is more like a researcher studying a natural phenomenon in a controlled environment. It's not about creating life from nothing, but about understanding the potential processes involved. If you want to understand how a car engine works, you don't need to build the entire car from scratch. You can just isolate its specific components, study their interactions, and learn about their functions. The Miller-Urey experiment was a similar approach to understanding the origins of life, and it was designed to mimic natural processes. Even if they didn't fully explain the entire process, the results have at least contributed to our understanding of how life might have originated.



How is this a flaw exactly? The experiment produced a racemic mixture of amino acids. Okay, and? Don't you think it's a natural consequence of the abiotic chemical reactions that occurred? It's not surprising that both L and D enantiomers were produced, as the reaction conditions didn't favor one over the other. You seem to be having a fundamental misunderstanding of the implications of the experiment. The fact that life on Earth uses L-amino acids doesn't mean that the primordial soup had to produce only L-amino acids. It's possible that the selection of L-amino acids occurred later, through chemical or biological processes that we don't yet fully understand. Funny enough, amino acids found in meteorites showing excesses of left-handed forms is actually evidence for the idea that the building blocks of life were delivered to Earth on comets or meteorites, and that these building blocks were already biased towards the L-enantiomer. This is a fascinating area of research that could potentially shed more light on the origins of life on Earth.



First of all, the experiment was not attempting to create an origin of life, but rather to demonstrate the possibility of spontaneous generation of amino acids. I've addressed this above. Secondly, it succeeded in producing several amino acids. As for the probability of the "spark" of life occurring, you're still relying on a classic creationist trope. The emergence of life is not a single event, but a complex process that likely occurred over millions of years. It's not about a lightning bolt striking a primordial soup, but rather the gradual accumulation of chemical reactions and interactions that eventually gave rise to self-replicating molecules. Furthermore, you're "mathematically impossible" claim is just you cherry-picking a specific calculation that suits your narrative while ignoring the vast body of evidence from multiple fields of science that supports the fact that life can emerge through natural processes. I'll clue you in on something you probably haven't considered yet: Even if you've manage to poke some holes in the Miller-Urey experiment (and let's be real, it's a 60-year-old experiment, so it's not like it's the only piece of evidence for abiogenesis), you still haven't presented any evidence for intelligent design. You're still relying on "god of the gaps" reasoning, where you point out the limitations of scientific knowledge and then insert your preferred explanation without providing any testable evidence.



You don't have to be melodramatic. Just present your best arguments and let's examine them critically. You're not impressing or intimidating anybody here with this pointless chest-beating.



Dude, just get to the point already. Thanks.

Your 50 paragraphs of argument is loaded with and full of "Probabilites and possibilities". Which took us back to my earlier question that are we supposed to just believe this probabilities and also pass them as factual occurrences just cause its coming from scientists?


If all these were in a religious context or prolly written to support some claims from those religious books, You would start to tell us how its dumb to take probabilities as facts.

you still haven't presented any evidence for intelligent design. You're still relying on "god of the gaps" reasoning, where you point out the limitations of scientific knowledge and then insert your preferred explanation without providing any testable evidence.

Thing is, I couldnt go further again after reading this and thats because you invented probabilities to fill in the gaps of most lapses seen in those very limited scientific experiments and explanations, same way religious folks invent God to fill in answers to questions they dont understand



In the end, Atheists cant prove that God doesnt exist, same way Theist cant also nor practically prove his existence and both would at a point reach a juncture that they either need to bring in probabilities or faith as they cant really explain things that happened millions of years ago without any witness documenting anything

Its a draw abeg....





Cant you drop your points without having to call my argument baseless? Must u erode peoples confidence during debates?
No testable evidence yet i dropped screenshot and a the title of the research journal i used to support my claims. Its even funny that the journal was actually a scientific paper from some scientists that did worked on modifying Millers experiment


Your argumentative pattern was one reason i ran away earlier this year. You know how to talkdown on ones point by constantly throwing subtle shades into your texts while making it seem like the opponent keeps giving watery and baseless points. Dont kill my self-esteem on top ordinary online debate



No kill me abeg. Its gotten to a point where my hearts skips anytime I see your moniker. So bad i had a dream yesterday night were u keep hitting me on arguments

Could come back when my head and mind are free from anxiety and sense of worthlessness. Will respond to your other post at night before i sleep

GreenxGreen:


Dem warned Naija people but Dem no gree hear 🙉

But una still talk say dem no vote am enter, say na rig hin rig am

Which one should we believe now?


Confused lots

Theres this saying that "History doesnt remember the one who came second", Obi even finished third, thats a bigger loser....

The longer u stay with him, the closer you are to becoming a serial loser in life. Some psychologists believe that people vibrate on energy levels that can be contacted by others.


If his very own Okonkwo could desert him, you have every reason to do same too

Thats in the North and this Jafaru should stop making it sound like people from here are migrating en masse to go hustle in Niger

He should be smart enough to know that by percentage population, the number of wanderers that left here to there should be 0.1%... very insignificant

They can come back in 2031 when a Northerner ascends the throne again. but why person go go Niger

MadamVanessa:


there's no flesh again in his body.. sickness is kicking him left right and centre, he should first of all deal with what he's suffering from.

Both this thread and the guy you quoted were all about his politics and influence not this BS you are talking about

His health matters should be his and his wife's worry, not yours

In the end, the average Nigerian with " thats not battling sickness" would prolly suffer more health-wise or even die before him


The earlier u understand life doesnt happen to people just cause they look sick, the earlier u stop mocking people for things u cant change for them

Years later, Apostle Paul said xtian men shouldnt keep long hair, so Jesus couldnt have had a long hair(even though he came before Paul)

Plus, his skin tone was more Arabian than European...His body mass too was a smaller frame, so any pic of Jesus like this is wrong


This comment section is funny.

This one na lie but even if na true, Lampard is a serial loser as a manager


make NFF no whine us abeg

This sounds reasonable

God bless PBAT

The fact that he's tryna constitute terror here in Nigeria as a non-Nigerian is a strong reason to prosecute him badly if proven guilty

Something like this happened under Roman Emperor Gaius and it wasnt funny for that Ethiopian guy

I'm expecting low IQ individuals to attack the FG instead, as per the white slaves wey dem be

Our Twitter errand boy

i'm expecting 5 more threads from u today

Sex sells and anything sex sells even more

You dont eve have to LovePeddler our yourself to dem fools, you only have to sell them a sex facade and then open a shop on top their mama head


I should start pimping out women very soon


If i were a lady in Nigeria, with how exposed and vast that i am...Hmmm
... but i can still get them to do it for me as a guy

Thats his opinion and every reasonable person should know that it wouldnt change the reality on ground'

Sarrki or whatever has only one vote. Voters on that day wouldnt come online to check his tweets before choosing who to vote for


A philosopher called Diogenes of Sinope said "Even dogs are allowed to have their own opinion"

I no dey see any pic o

According to Fabrizio, they offered him less than half his current wage at Napoli

4m from 10m

These useless experts stand on the byline to spew shiity analysis as they know that no one would hold them responsible for failed suggestions/analysis even if things go south

They said multiple things about the impact of Dangote refinery and the CBN rate sometimes in April 2023 and here we are, none seem great like projected earlier

Trash

Taiwo Awoniyi has never represented us in any Major competition bar one. Dude is always injured few weeks to a major tournament, only to come back and start showing up for useless friendlies and qualifiers. He flopped badly at that 2021 AFCON


We need to solve our "No.10 delimma" else, all these ones na waste of time

We pack DM full team like say na WW3

They dont

The fact that he's tryna constitute terror here in Nigeria as a non-Nigerian is a strong reason to prosecute him badly if proven guilty

Something like this happened under Roman Emperor Gaius and it wasnt funny for that Ethiopian guy

I'm expecting low IQ individuals to attack the FG instead, as per the white slaves wey dem be

What if the Ex turns out to be a replica of your wife after your marriage to her



Going by the kinda stories i read online from wailing men(the are more sob stories from men than we have from women)Its good to assume there are no good women out there anymore.


I know its a ridiculous dedcution but how do you explain getting wedded to what u know, only to start seeing you're married to what u dont know?

Antoeni:
First of All Tinubu was not democratically elected.Tinubu was selected by INEC & Judiciary, after he was popularly rejected by the Nigerian people.Tinubu was foisted on Nigerians by inec,Buhari and compromised judiciary.He bought the presidency.Nigerians knew whom they voted and certainly it isn’t Tinubu

See wetin u dey write for public forum and you're even passing it like a statement of fact

I used to think Obidients like trolling for the fun of it but it seems you guys really mean it and those laughable comment form you guys is the peak of your knowledge


Chijioke, I hope you can defend this through...

Gistmedia10:
Netizens continue to praise Rema for staying grounded and appreciating his roots, proving once again that success doesn't make one forget the past.

Why?

No be hin cup of tea be that?

Zionmdde:
Ogbeni sharrap there
Coming here to pretend as if you have any love or respect for Igbos.

This is why i questioned your intelligence the other day

If it AREWA or AFENIFERE, I would have said same too

I dont have to like Igbos to respect their Socio-cultural group. Our trolling should have boundaries, Its called Civility.

You act like u just clocked 17 yesterday

How this wan go take cost 200m? when no be Zimbabwean dollar we dey spend

This guy is up there with Portable, dem sabi talk mumu things to trend

Its 2024 and in all you do, try remember that 'anything sex' sells. Try Monetize it anyhow please