₦airaland Forum

This Onwubiko guy na anywhere belle face
I dont even understand what HURIWA stands for

Dude hasnt said anything yet about things going on in the SE...Na to dey talk about other states hin sabi

Wasnt aware of this, would have gone

My NL Nnewi bae no gree call and she sabi say from Ukpo to Nnewi no far


Good one

See news source abeg

Spits

NoPeaceForHim:
They should also arrest the guy that provoked her.

Nobody provoked her to say all those

She hosted a live TikTok session with all the participants being her tribesmen only, where they shared several opinions on diff killing strategy and the link was out as soon as the session started. All those "provoked" shii was a video from god knows where and it came out up to 3days after the whole issue escalated

Her own live video is here

Breaking News : Warning to Yorubas and Benin people . IGBos have come together to start poisoning Benin and Yoruba people Food because they hate them so much and want them gone

Warn your families !!!! 🚨🚨

“ The hate we have for Yoruba and Benin people “ igbo woman says pic.twitter.com/0Hov5ypnv9

— Nononsense (@NoNonsensezone) August 27, 2024

This is 2024, stop justifying evil

I thought her bloodas boasted that she wouldnt be arrested as shes a Canadian Citizen(or wetin be that their premises of argument again)

I no know wetin dem dey teach them for school for that side. Dem suppose dey flop all the lecturers for those their Uni for that side


That more than half of them even tried to justify or playdown her actions tell u everything u have to know about them.

Thank God for the 2023 General election that exposed all these to us

MadPolitician:
Abike Dibari should raise complaints about MC Oluomo, Oba Akiolu, Bayo Onanuga and all the pro APC characters that have inundated the public space with all sorts anti igbo outbursts since 2015

Dont derail the thread, guy

Theres nothing smart in trying to justify evil acts. Lets talk about this Amaka case today...Ikenna, No bring up ancient topics

richeeyo:
But who they follow you figth bayi
DNA too na championship for u

It's funny how u skipped all the first 5 comments on this thread where those Igbo guys were claiming champions only to attack him....he's the 8 commenter



Your hypocrisy stinks, Chinedu

NinjaMetahuman:
What exactly is the meaning of this nonsense stat?

It says lagos, which has 70% Yorubas and 30% other tribes/foreigners.

Which tribe is supposed to do more DNA there then?

The fact that less than 60% is even too low.

Forget about those clowns

My major worry is how the percentage of Yoruba that too that rest is even lower than 60%

BigYash:
Why did Finidi call him out? Was Osimhen the team he was employed to manage? Osi might be going through this now,this time will pass. Finidi own sef fit no far.. That’s life for you.. what goes around,does what?

That's the thing

He should also call Napoli out and curse Conte like he did to Finidi

I detest hypocrites and cowards

JessicaRabbit:
If you don't mind, I've split your response into two separate threads. I feel like the first half of your riposte is simply an extension of our discussion in the DNA thread, and extending that part of our correspondence to this thread will practically be derailing this thread. So I'm only going to address the second half of your response here:



Have you ever heard of Gloria Steinem? She was a popular journalist and social activist in the 1970s. There's a famous quote she's very well known for, which just happens to be the title of one of her books. The quote reads: "the truth will set you free, but first it will piss you off!". Your desperate name-calling and accusations towards me don't bother me one bit because I can tell that you're just being emotional over the fact that I've got you cornered since Day 1. So go ahead and let it all out. If you can't handle a little scrutiny, that's not my problem. But if you're willing to have an honest conversation and clear the air, I'm here for it.



So you claim you're not trying to compete with me intellectually, yet you've been shadowboxing with me for months, always landing jabs but never a solid punch. You challenged me to debate you, posturing like someone wanting to engage with me in good faith, but you never followed through when I accepted. If you're not here to engage with me, then why do you keep popping up like a jack-in-the-box in every thread I'm in, making rude and dishonest remarks about me and scurrying away before the discussion gets too taxing for your fragile ego? Obviously you have some kind of problem with me. If you think you can take me down a peg, then by all means, try. As for me, I'm not here to win a popularity contest or massage your wounded ego.



I'm sorry, but your actions betray your words. If you weren't threatened by me for some weird reason, you wouldn't be going through the trouble of using new monikers that I've never engaged with to make petty remarks about me. In said comments, you don't even quote me directly. Can you finally understand why I insist that you're a dishonest individual?



Coming from someone who's been shadowing me across threads, this is hilarious. If you're not interested in engaging with me, then why do you keep showing up in my orbit? If you're not looking for my comments, then why do you always seem to find them? And why do you always feel compelled to respond with snide remarks and excuses instead of engaging in a genuine discussion? Can you give an honest answer?



Lol. Please spare me the faux outrage and the pretentious concern for civility. Have you ever observed peer review sessions within the scientific community? Normally, I'd ask you to look up the meaning of ad hominem and understand the difference between unprovoked personal attacks and harsh, but critical examinations of an argument or presentation, but you probably wouldn't understand anyway and falsely accuse me of trying to manipulate you, so I'm not going to waste my time there. The only thing I'll tell you is this: If you can't handle the heat, then perhaps you should refrain from playing with fire. And if you're still unsure about how to engage in a substantive discussion, I can offer you some pointers - or better yet, a mirror, so you can examine your own intellectual dishonesty.



I'm not sure what Gemini AI's opinion on insults has to do with anything. If you're incapable of distinguishing between a scathing critique and a personal attack on your own, then that's not my problem. A fair assessment is not about sugarcoating the truth, it's about calling out BS when you see it, and your constant evasions, excuses, and lack of intellectual honesty are all BS. I'm not here to coddle your fragile ego or make you feel good about yourself. If you want to be taken seriously, then prove to me that you're serious and that you're not trying to waste my time. Don't go behind my back, casting aspersions on my character and making unfounded accusations about me. I'm not obligated to treat such behavior with kid gloves.

I have a thicker skin now and your words don't move me anymore...You can say anything you want and trust me, how you also feel about my socalled "snide remarks" is irrelevant to me. And next time you you hit me that hard...my response could send u outta Nairaland

What you refer to as "Name-calling" is nothing but my "fair assessment" of who you are.

Saying you're manipulative and Domineering are traits you've always exhibited...they aren't some sort of personal attacks


As for your repetitive accusations of my popping up on your threads section, the only time I ever did that was when I tagged Dtruth in the other thread. The second and last time I said anything about you is in this thread, and its not likr followed you here, I already commented on this thread and you haven't, so I didnt follow you here.

Again, I didn't "keep popping up your face and running away like a coward or whatever". It happened just once, you weren't even in the second thread

Also, tagging you with a new moniker was because my two other accounts were banned and this is the only one I can use for now....the only wrong thing I did here was that i should have signalled to you that it's me(that would have buried off this "dishonest" tag u gave me. And also, I should have tagged u directly, as for the remarks, they were neither rude nor were they some sort of attack...I carefully selected my words


I deliberately explain this in details cause I want u to stop saying I feel threatened by you and I keep following you around...none of this is true and I stopped replying you since February until that Dtruth incidence. I have nothing against you please and I'm not a coward



You called me a:
rabble-rouser

A fraud that confused himself to be an enlightened individual

One with Pseudo-intelligence


And you really said these aren't personal attacks? The funny thing here is how you don't see anything wrong in all these yet you're quick to call tags like "Control-freak" a personal attack



It's either you are saying this for argumentative sake or you're just a dishonest person like me(fair assessment)


You have justifications for your verbal attacks while you expect the other person to remain mute and not go all hard against you

JessicaRabbit:
Well, you're wrong. Transitional fossils do exist, and plenty have been discovered over time. As a matter of fact, the fossil record actually shows a clear pattern of gradual changes in life forms over time. Look up Tiktaalik, a fish-tetrapod transitional form, or the Archaeopteryx, or the Ambulocetus etc. These discoveries have been extensively documented and verified by the scientific community, so I'm not sure what you were on about there. The "lack of transitional fossils" argument is typical creationist propaganda of pointing out alleged flaws in opposing theories, rather than presenting any evidence to support theirs. The lack of intermediate forms between dogs and cats is not entirely surprising, following the theory that they diverged from a common ancestor millions of years ago. The fossil record is incomplete, and surely we wouldn't expect to find every single transitional form. Nevertheless, clear patterns of gradual changes in the fossil record have been seen, consistent with the theory of evolution. Another thing you probably need to understand is that the concept of "kinds" or "categories" is a subjective human construct, and not a scientifically defined boundary. The diversity of life on Earth is a continuum, with species blending into one another. And just because you have never observed evolution happening in real-time doesn't automatically mean it never occurred and isn't still occurring. Evolution is not a magic spectacle that unfolds before our eyes. It's a gradual process spanning countless generations. You must have heard this axiom before, but the absence of evidence for something is not evidence of its absence.



From this paragraph here, it is clear that you didn't understand what the Miller-Urey experiment was all about, or what it hoped to achieve. Don't get yourself confused. The experiment was all about demonstrating the possibility of spontaneous generation of amino acids, the building blocks of life, from a primordial soup. And, surprise, surprise... it succeeded in producing several amino acids, including glycine, alanine, and aspartic acid. You seem to think the experiment was solely focused on the idea of evolving cells from simple organisms to complex ones. You've got it all wrong. I'm trying not to trigger the anti spam bots by posting links, so while I can't refer you to any link for clarification, I'll implore you to spend more time researching the experiment and studying it to know what it was really all about.



Also, the experiment's results were far from a "dead end." In fact, they sparked a new wave of research into the origins of life on Earth. The experiment has been refined and expanded upon numerous times, with scientists exploring different conditions and environments that could have led to the emergence of life. The fact that scientists have not yet fully replicated the evolution of complex cells in a laboratory setting does not negate the overwhelming evidence from multiple fields of study (fossil record, comparative anatomy, molecular biology, etc.) that supports evolution. And by the way, I'm still waiting for your demonstration of intelligent design through complexity of the DNA. How do you explain the presence of pseudogenes, vestigial genes, and other "imperfections" in the human genome if it was intelligently designed?



I believe I have sufficiently addressed this argument. The notion that the fossil record should be a complete, unbroken chain of intermediates is a gross misunderstanding of how fossilization works. Fossilization is a rare occurrence, and the conditions necessary for it to happen are quite specific. It's not a surprise that we don't have a complete record. Moreover, the idea that there are no intermediates in the fossil record is simply false. I have already referred you to a few examples above.



So you're saying that because the evolutionary transition from invertebrates to vertebrates is complex and still not fully understood, we must therefore attribute the gaps in our knowledge to magic? Don't you think this puzzling enigma you speak of is actually a testament to the amazing progress science has made in understanding the natural world? We've come a long way in uncovering the secrets of evolution, and the fact that there's still more to learn is what makes it so exciting. Dragging magic into the picture ruins the whole fun. You've left the realm of intellectual curiosity and settled for resigned speculation. The fact that there are still unanswered questions in science is not evidence of intelligent design. In fact, it's just evidence that we need to keep studying and learning. And by the way, I don't see the point of you appealing to ancient mythical texts as if they're relevant to modern scientific discussions. It's utterly useless. You might as well just use a map from the 14th century to navigate a modern city you're visiting for the first time.



We don't have direct witnesses to the formation of the Grand Canyon either, but we can still study the geological evidence and understand its origins, can't we? Evolution is not just about human existence. It's about the diversity of life on Earth, and the overwhelming evidence from various fields in science serve to strengthen its position in the scientific community. It's funny you mentioned the consistency of animal descriptions over time because it is actually evidence for evolution, not against it. If species were unchanging, that would be a problem for evolution. But the fact that we see changes in species over time, even if the descriptions of those species remain similar, supports evolution. But all of that is neither here nor there. I believe you should be focusing more on your proof for intelligent design in this discussion. Firstly, it is not even a testable hypothesis, whereas evolution is. We can't design experiments to test the will of a supernatural being, but we can test the predictions of evolution. So ultimately, you still have the burden of proof here. I'm interested to see what you can come up with.



Finally! I'll be looking forward to it.

I must admit that debating with you draining. I suddenly become depressed as soon as I see your response to any argument brought forward.
I wish I could have another person have a go at you while i keep supplying the person with my own points from the background and while i also dont have to read your comments myself. Must u have a response for everything?



The first bolded made me lost interest reading the whole thing you addressed there. I didnt bother reading that paragraph as the bolded is a proof you've had Xtians bring that up to you in many debates in the past and I guess you defeated them there. I dont want u to beat me with experience

For the second bolded, The aim was to first prove that the building blocks of life could be synthesized abiotically from gases, which is same as evidence that spontaneous generation could have happened in the past. If that is off the the whole issues, then we can start talking about the first simplest life form evolving into the next complect life form. So what do you mean by i dont understand what the experiment is about?

The aim was to create life first, before evolution into whatever we have now and I just skipped all these in my earlier posts.

Now Millers experiment still had some flaws:

The validity of his explanation, however, rests on the presumption that the earth’s primordial atmosphere was “reducing.” That means it contained only the smallest amount of free (chemically uncombined) oxygen. Why? if much free oxygen was present, ‘none of the amino acids could even be formed, and if by some chance they were, they would decompose quickly'.

Two years after his experiment, Miller wrote: “These ideas are of course speculation, for we do not know that the Earth had a reducing atmosphere when it was formed"(This a mere assumption that havent been proved or confirmed across the so-called "modified and Improved versions of Millers experiment) You can search for 'THE 1953 STANLEY L. MILLER EXPERIMENT:
FIFTY YEARS OF PREBIOTIC ORGANIC CHEMISTRY'.(Screenshot below)

It is basic and common science that the sunlights ultraviolet rays that are currently blocked by the ozone layer would have damaged hydrogen based molecules in the ancient atmosphere. This type of atmosphere consisting of carbon dioxide and nitrogen would not have been supportive, for the creation of acids and other building blocks essential for life to form.


Another thing is that Oxygen is highly reactive. For example, it combines with iron and forms rust or with hydrogen and forms water. If there was much free oxygen in an atmosphere when amino acids were assembling, it would quickly combine with and dismantle the organic molecules as they formed. So what are the proofs that those early atmosphere was actually diffrent from our current one and that it was actuallly a reducing one from what we currently have... It is just an invented assumption to prove that life actually began that way.


Also, If the gas mixture represents the atmosphere, the electric spark mimics lightning, and boiling water stands in for the sea, what or who does the scientist arranging and carrying out of the experiment represent? I know you dont have to necessarily invent a creator or designer here



Another flaw is the racemic (containing both L and D enantiomers) mixture of amino acids produced in a Miller–Urey experiment is also problematic for abiogenesis theories as life on Earth today uses L-amino acids.
We know that there are right-handed and left-handed gloves. This is also true of amino acid molecules. Of some 100 known amino acids, only 20 are used in proteins, and all are left-handed ones. When scientists make amino acids in laboratories, in imitation of what they feel possibly occurred in a prebiotic soup, they find an equal number of right-handed and left-handed molecules
It is even believed that Even amino acids found in meteorites showed excesses of left-handed forms.



I had the intention to talk about the "Evolution Gap between Ape and Man" but i had to quickly stop by and help show to you that in as much as Millers expriment was a classic, yet it had a few fundamental flaws and it was even founded on some assumtions that are hard to confirm.
If we couldnt create an origin of life, if the atmospheric condition then wasnt even conducive for a primordial soup to form, even though the chance of the so-called spark running across a gaseous mixture coincidentally is almost close to nothing(it is even mathematically impossible to happen as the probability is greater than 1 in 1000000), how then do we move on to the evolution of single cell organism to a complex one or do we just also assume/believe and have faith life actually came into existence under those "hard-to-replicate" condition Miller talked about?



When I'm back tomorrow from work, I go load u with more...I pity you now The most Excellent Jessica, its gonna be a long week for you. Points full ground, na to type long be my problem not the points.


DNA complexity is my last resort and the biggest in my Arsenal, i reserve it for the last argument. No one ever made it to that point and you wont either

I pray you dont have another responses to this

sofeo:
The major reason we are backward, very foolish mentality. Germany population was 78.29 million (1980), while Nigerian population was 72.95 million (1980).

Fast track to 2024, Germany is around 83 Million, while Nigerian Population is around 230 Million.

The name thing with U.S, and some other advanced countries, slight increase in population

Get married and struggle to feed the the family, not to talk of giving them a better life, children will grow up to be hooligans and illiterates, and the problems in our society keep multiplying.

So population is the reason we're backwards?


What's the population of Iceland to the USA?

How come US is above them in every indices?

What about Croatia,Belarus?

What's the population increase in percentage over the last 50years as compared to the US?


China is more populated than Poland....compare the increase in the last 50years and tell me why China is still ahead in every developmental indices despite th huge population

You guys should start talking like educated folks abeg. Any small thing "This is why we're backwards "


You that aren't backwards, what have u done to push your country forward?

Its why I told Jorion then that Simping has nothing to do with "Not being Smart"....it's just about having poor emotional judgement in matters of women

You can be an excellent Astronaut and still simp for an orange seller

If you read across those historical books, there are bigger simping stories among successful Emperors and Kings of old

Shame on this dude tho

This isn't a realistic writeup


You just want those bitter people to come here and start cursing average earning family men and women 🗑️

He should curse Conte the way he cursed Finidi

In fact, Finidi no talk reach this one before Victor start to dey insult am


Those that justified his verbal attack on Finidi then should help Contr justify this attach too ..Don't be hypocritical

I thought guys from the SE said it's all propaganda while using their pseudo-logic to analyze rubbish

I'll stop reading their comments going forward 🗑️

Alvin212:
Chelsea should sell the Yoruba boy

In their squard

Aderobioyo is not good enough


Omoluabi in the. Mud

OriginalSly, don't be hypocritical

Scold this guy for derailing a football thread with tribal banter...This is 2024

JessicaRabbit:
It's good you didn't try to deny it. You could have fooled anyone here but definitely not me.

To answer your first question -- No, I don't track people's IP addresses. I guess I'm just good at recognizing the aroma of pseudo-intelligence and stale excuses. It's not hard to detect when someone like you posts in this forum with the way you make snide remarks in a thread before scampering off like a child playing truancy. I have tried countless times to give you the benefit of the doubt, but your constant episodes of dishonest evasions and petty side comments have led me to believe that you're just a rabble rouser trying to start a fight with me for no reason other than the fact that you clearly feel threatened by me, and I can't help but wonder why.

And your excuse for not providing evidence is laughable. I mean, you're the one creating multiple usernames to avoid accountability. My sporadic presence here is not the fantastic excuse you think it is for you to dodge my questions continually, especially since you've had ample time to craft a substantive response. If you can't handle the wait, then maybe you should reconsider engaging in discussions that require intellectual honesty and rigor, instead of you to keep making excuses in a thinly veiled attempt to mask your inability to provide a coherent argument.

As for your "degree", maybe you can give me a very solid reason for why I should care? How does your education obligate you to respond to me? Is it a requirement to salvage your wounded ego? You sound too desperate here, like someone really struggling to save face.

Look, if you're not going to address the simple questions you've been asked, but keep up with your unnecessary and childish antics instead, then you've only confirmed what I've suspected about you all along. You're a fraud who has confused himself with an enlightened individual, and who boosts his ego by making surface level references to academic materials he doesn't understand. In that case, you can just spare us both the time and find something better to do.

Firstly, The absence of evidence supporting the theory of evolution is evident in the fact that no one has ever witnessed it occurring.. If it was a true process, evolution would still be happening and there should plenty of "transitional" forms for us to see. Instead, of course we see a diversity of "kinds" or plants and animals with variations within each kind... . With distinct and seemingly overwhelming differences, among each categories. That is, we have a lot of different breeds of dogs and lots more of cats and nothing like an intermediate or transitional form from say, one with a characteristic combination dog and cat before eventually becoming dog. Neither now in 2Ist century, nor at any point in our history was any discovered via Fossil records .



In fact, Scientifically, using Laboratory techniques, the only attempts of evolutionary scientists to show how Cells evolve from a simple organism to a much more complex one is the "Stan Miller experiment of gaseous mixture in test tubes" and I would assume you know how it ended. Its even more funny that that experiment didnt give the needed result and neither has the experiment progressed any further than where Miller's ended. A dead end

The entire history of evolution from the evolution of life from non-life to the evolution of vertebrates from invertebrates and the evolution of man from the ape is strikingly devoid of intermediates: the links are all missing in the fossil record, just as they are in the present world.


It's fascinating to think about how an invertebrate creature, in the ocean transitioned into the first vertebrate. The initial fish. With its internal hard parts as opposed to external ones.

The evolution from bodied invertebrates to the earliest vertebrate fishes remains a puzzling enigma, with various theories circulating widely.
There are plenty of spaces with no clear sequence of transitions, in sight. Instead, things remain the same way they have been from how they were being described in the earliest book ever written by men, either in historical books like the Epic of Gilgamesh or in those early biological books by philosophers like Theophrastus and Aristotle's books on zoology.

Its not too smart to use Evolution that was rumoured to have occured years before the earliest men started writing books as the origin of human existence. When there arent live witnesses to these things and even earlier description of animals is still same now in 2024 as it was in 500BCE(Approximately 3500+ years when you add the description of animals in the Epic of Gilgamesh to it). How is diff from the religious gibberish that asked people to exercise faith and believe what they also dont see?


I will delve into DNA complexities in the next response.





Now, to your entire comment
Uche, You are the most manipulative human i know, you're a Narcissist too, a Dominatrix, humiliatrix,a Bully and also a control freak.

This is the first time in my entire life that i would be reading an online comment directed at me and i was moved to tears. I'm not trying to compete with you intellectually, so I see no reason why you should question my intellectual level... You'd feel bad if I did same


I changed moniker cause the other two were banned on other sections and not to "dodge accountability" and you're not the reason for that in anyway
Also, why would i feel threatened by you? Are you my God? Are you the one I worship? Dont overrate yourself please

I cant deny the fact that I'm always scared to read your comments when i bump into them but its not like i generally look for your comment or even follow you. I dont even open that Religious section and thats why all our arguments have been here in the Romance section

I would have wanted to respond to you the way you did to me but if i dare to do that, you'll start accusing me of being insulting and uncivil, which makes me wonder how you couldnt see anything insulting in all your name-calling and personal attacks on me.

I know you'd wanna call your comment a fair assessment but even Gemini sees this as an insult(I asked Gemini a with a balanced prompt cause i wanted to be sure those are insults and not what u want me to believe it is). You'd attack people and still wanna brainwash them into believing its a fair assessment and nothing personal. Dont destroy my self-esteem. I'm not as worthless as you painted me.

Mariangeles:
Is death truly the end end?
How sure was he? Did the writer die, then come back to prove those words?

We can't just believe everything we read just because the words are "beautifully" put together.

My Crush tagged my message

Wow...I feel flattered already. Lemme screenshot this

This means alot to me


So, Do you want me to address those questions you asked? I have an answer to them and dont snub me please

afrika:
How can one person poison the whole Yoruba and Benin?
This statement is taken too serious because the person that made it is from the Igbo extract?
Other times people hear threats of other extracts to the Igbo people and alarms were never raised this way.
Unfortunately, people who threaten full tribes out of hatred are simple FOOLS.
Yesterday a friend of mine, an igbo guy, married his long time Edo girlfriend. Even though the mama of the girl had initially kicked against it, but the girl had fallouts with the mother. Yet at the end of the day, God sealed their marriage.

What thing for sure is that Delta and Edo is still BENDEL STATE. Divide and rule suggestions from the Britain keeps separating us more. Before now, all these bendel, Onitsha, Rivers etc were once Eastern Region protectorate. All was one.

We are Africans and never believe ourselves unless the whites come to say, this is true.

The killings in the country is as a result of ethnicity because they told us we are from different places. Because Mongo park discovered even the rivers that our fire fathers had met on earth. That was why some kings in the Benin Kingdom, Kofi empires never wanted to bow to the British and most were assassinated.

The brains of an intelligent African is like a formatted flash drive. The whites would keep installing new informations and keeping us at war.

We live the right things to do and use religion and other sentiments to grope in the dark.

It's a pity, history has been scraped and every blackman wants to be the richest while others suffer .

Take care my people and let us learn to LOVE ....BECAUSE KNOWING GOD, IS LOVING EVERYTHING HE CREATED THAT IS OF HIS IMAGE

You ended your Epistles with "love God" yet u didn't condemn her hate speech in any of your lines. Instead, you blame those that took up the case


You're igbo...

You people are something else

Wildkat02:
How can the Oba of Lagos have that same type of hatred for the igbos by threatening to grow them inside the lagoon

That's also wrong

I'll never defend evil.

I'm human first before any tribe

Don't justify one evil with another...it makes u sound like a beast

Thefirmorganics:
And I am glad state of origin is required. I pray the SE are not favored so we are not slaves forever

But SE applied

They shouldn't have applied at all

This is a useless prayer

So Eastern students apply

I'd invite her siblings over, get a loaded gun, hand it over to her, lock them up in a room and ask her to do whatever the "Raging pregnancy hormone" is tryna make her do

Dem no fit use me do target practice for house

4'2 in height is barely above the ground

I don't envy you bro

Women say these things to have a leeway to misbehave, betray people and still get away with it


We are all adults....If you are so unstable that a random emotional trigger in your could make you jettison a long-term relationship, then you're not fit to live among humans



Oestrogens wont turn you into a callous human... you just have a terrible personality 🗑️

fesse:
Why are you filled with so much hate, bad energy, envy, jealous, bitterness, wickedness and same time very wretched? Who would have done this to you? Move away from clouds covering you.

You people are bloody Hypocritices

Didn't u see the other guy he was dragging with?


Why didn't u scold that one too?


Oh, he's Igbo and you have to let it slide while u attack Non-Igbos 🗑️

VULCAN:
Thought you were going to give 99 examples.

You ran out of fuel at just 2 persons because the First lady of a state is not an elected nor a career position. Therefore she doesn't count.

By the way, Tinubu is from Osun not Ondo.

You must be a young APC ur..in, You're still learning current affairs

And this case is just one case

3 vs 1.... That's fair

Mention 1 of it that had happened in Igbo land since 1960

loveth360:
No different between them and Yorubas.

I talk am
It's an international banter but u had to mention Yoruba


You see why I like it when
OriginalSly, come and preach to your sister

loveth360:
No different between them and Yorubas.

I talk am
It's an international banter but u had to mention Yoruba


You see why this 'One Nigerian' thing is a scam


Chidimma is Igbo....Igbos should have their fight with SA alone


Na only una Dem hate