₦airaland Forum

Jkyoung:
how does that stop GEJ from sending the cattle rearer back to daura

Rawani:
It amazes me that even in the light of the revelation by the US Government, that plans to gas the insurgents and rescue the Chibok girls were sabotaged by the Nigerian Government who revealed the plans to the insurgents prompting them to wear gas masks, yet people are still doubting the involvement of GEJ in this insurgency.

If still in doubt, analyse the recent revelation as well by the UK Government, in this case, that if they disclose the reason they withdrew their military support, it would ignite a massive diplomatic crisis with Nigeria. This was in response to a FOI request by a UK citizen (links available on request). Read between the lines and understand what they are not saying.

Time will tell confirm.

medamillion:
Who is the real sponsor of this blood-sucking group?
Is it Jonathan? Is it Buhari? Let's read before we comment.

NORTH WILL MAKE NIGERIA UNGOVERNABLE IF JONATHAN IS ELECTED:

First, the infamous statement "North Will Make Nigeria Ungovernable If Jonathan is elected" made by PDP's Lawal Kaita was evilly attributed to GMB by Ruben Abati. This was a plot to associate GMB to the post-election violence in the North, where scores of young Nigerians were killed citing that statement. When the evil scheme was exposed, Ruben Abati and Guardian Newspaper apologised to General Buhari and Nigerians saw the truth.
Here is a link where presidency begged Buhari to settle the slander case out of court.
http://dailypost.ng/2013/01/13/presidency-begs-buhari-to-settle-slander-case-out-of-court/.

AN ATTACK ON BOKO HARAM IS AN ATTACK ON THE NORTH:--GMB, how true?

Looking at the emergence of the condemnable blood-sucking group, one would think they are just "small" group seeking their share of national cake from the government. (Just like the Niger Delta Militants)
That was perhaps, the reason he made such statement.
The same Buhari condemned Boko Haram when he realized their real motive, which was to destabilize Nigeria.
Here is how Buhari condemmned them as reported PUNCH: http://www.punchng.com/news/boko-haram-mindless-bogots-buhari/
I am yet to get any news on Jonathan condemning Boko Haram, much like Buhari.

COMPARE THESE STATEMENTS

Compare the statements made by Buhari and the ones made by GEJ on Boko Haram and tell me, if you are a police officer, who would you arrest?

Here is what GEJ has to say:

"Boko Haram is not as a result of misrule; definitely not. Sometimes people say it is as a result of poverty; definitely not. Boko Haram is a local terror group,”  President Goodluck Jonathan said in an interview with CNN’s Christiane Amanpour, 2013."

"Boko Haram is in my cabinet" - GEJ

On August 2nd of 2012, Nigeria’s President, Goodluck Ebele Jonathan famously said:

“They (Boko Haram) are our siblings and you cannot send the army to wipe out your family…. We are handling them with a soft approach.”

"I underestimated BokoHaram"-GEJ

If it was Buhari who made all these statements above,
What would be the election point of the propagandists?

QUESTIONS TO ASK:
Does Jonathan really care?
Did Jonathan just wakeup from slumber on BokoHaram insurgency?
Why did Jonathan start visiting Borno(crime scene) now?
Is he doing all these because he loves his people or because he wants to win election?

REMEMBER:
The President went dancing two days after Boko Haram massacre at Baga
http://theconversation.com/goodluck-jonathan-president-went-dancing-two-days-after-boko-haram-massacre-at-baga-36182

ATTEMPT ON BUHARI'S LIFE

Attempt was made on Buhari's life on July 24, 2014. A Presidential ally Asari Dokubo called it a scam, saying it was pre-planned by the Daura General. Many of us had insisted that the assassination attempt was politically motivated using BH as a tool, if we are to go back to the words of a Shekau's 2 i/c Abu Abdulazeez, we may have a clue
He stressed that recent killings and destructions in Maiduguri were against the ideology of the sect, which he said was fighting the cause of Allah.

Abu Abdulazeez dissociated Boko Haram from the action, saying such attacks were not only politically-motivated, but carried out by those seeking power in the Borno Emirate council or in government.

Jonathan promised to set up a committee (as usual) to investigate the crime;
Where is the committee?
Where is the report?

Nigerians be wise.
GOD bless Nigeria
GOD bless the Daura-born General
GOD bless all progressives and non (money) protection seekers.

#medamillion
I am back from BAN; The freedom fight continues

teemanbastos:
lol..,.80% of apc fans are in their offices but dose pdp u cee are d 80% of dia fans in lagos. The polls go surprise yhu...

Javanian:
Are Windows and Linux mutually exclusive?

adrainuche: They are so many problems with inheritance, Class Explosion the Ripple Effect as so on ..

sisqology: Design results ready. Deelopers, the way you people have arranged your projects are making things difficult, some of you, so many errors(urls), soome of you, your codes have failed to run at all.

Google has said it will give preference to more secure websites in its search rankings from now on.

The search engine has been testing highlighting pages that have HTTPS encryption by default, and will now roll out across its algorithms.

"We've seen positive results, so we're starting to use HTTPS as a ranking signal," Google said.

The decision could encourage more sites to turn on encryption, which makes them less vulnerable to hacking.

Encryption is used to digitally scramble data as it passes between a user's device and an online service in order to prevent others eavesdropping on the information.

It is used by many, but not all, sites that show a little padlock and use a web address beginning HTTPS. The "S" stands for secure.

But for many firms across the web, adding encryption has to this point been an additional burden in terms of time and costs.

'Best interest'
"Previously organisations have shied away from encryption due to cost concerns or fears of slowing website response times," said Jason Hart, of the data protection consultancy SafeNet.

"But there are now high-speed encryption technologies available that mean cost and speed need no longer be an issue.

"So there really is no excuse for any data to be transmitted or stored in plain text.

"Every company wants to rank favourably on Google, so it's in their best interest to ensure web pages are encrypted."

Google said that - for the time being - whether a site was encrypted or not would not be a crucial factor in how they ranked sites.

"For now it's only a very lightweight signal - affecting fewer than 1% of global queries, and carrying less weight than other signals such as high-quality content - while we give webmasters time to switch to HTTPS," Google's Zineb Ait Bahajji and Gary Illyes said in the blog post.

sisqology: you mean asp.net / MVC?? if yes, why not? but if windows form; no.

Bluestream: Please send your resume to bluestreamltd at gmail.com