₦airaland Forum

CLOUDRepublic:
And I am here unemployed defending APC with my free subscription... Meanwhile slot is going on the low key 😔😔

Kdon2:
Na you still dey cry here now o😂🤣🤸‍♂️

Kdon2:
See

Cry

AustineE1:
Dignity in labour as a data boy,tell me something else.

madridguy:
The document detailed the killing of civilians in Asaba during the Nigerian Civil War.

How come the documents didn't detail how Ojukwu and his biafra soldiers started the war by bombing yaba area of Lagos, looted the CBN,Benin city and committed a lot of atrocities.

Kdon2:
President Tinubu is too soft for this headless mob I swear! Who cares question buharis men when buhari was in power☹️

Peoples Gazette had on Monday reported that Mr Adeyemi alleged during a press conference last week that Mr Gbajabiamila received N400 million through a proxy and demanded an additional N200 million to secure his appointment, while also requesting 48 per cent of the PFIPC’s N27.4 billion take-off grant, a request he said he rejected.

arewafederation:
What kind of amala game are these useless people playing?

Nigeria has gone to the dogs....

Demonic01:
If you are taken to court to proof that BAT is a fake certificate holder, you won't prove it. ‼️🤡

BlocksNG:
see this enemy of progress, scavenger.

Richtaiwo:
Completely unrelated and senseless post though.

CharlesCNG:
My brother, this is not a rebuttal. This is emotional exhaust smoke.

You accused me of changing monikers, supporting lies, defending a messiah, deceiving Muslims, fake certificate, failed strategist, propaganda, religious bigotry, tribalism and electricity fraud — yet you did not answer the actual issue raised in the thread you are responding to.

i know the typical obidient playbook: If you cannot counter the message, try to deflect by going for the messaenger.

That is the contradiction you are running away from.

All this “fake certificate,” “roasted fraud,” and “snatched office” chanting is just political karaoke. Loud, familiar, and empty.

You people have mastered the art of using abuse as a smoke bomb. Once the argument becomes inconvenient, you throw every slogan into the air and hope nobody remembers the question.

But I remember.

The question is not whether you hate Tinubu. That one is already obvious.


So please, park the tantrum and answer the argument.

.

Richtaiwo:
Until now, I honestly used to think Pastor Adeboye is a Christian. Thanks for the head up.

TemplarLandry:
This feminine man called Hobi keeps deceiving himself.
He's a pretender not a contender.

Lithiumite:
And so what? Did adeboye stop you from protesting against tinubu if you want to,same GEJ you are killing yourself over doesn't even give a hoot about your existence and will always sit on same table with this same adeboye,wsnt the current SP akpabio part of that same govt but where is he now........you people enjoy dwelling on irelevances,even GEJ himself has distanced himself from the same PDP that made him president but here you are still sulking over nonsense......its apparent your angst against tinubu is just due to the fact he bettered whoever it is you have ever thrown up against him.....go get a life dude!!

garykoeman:
Opposition of comedians.

APC is afraid of a man who ran away from every party primaries.

CharlesCNG:
Thank you for proving the article correct with your own mouth.

You say “no one is attacking Pastor Adeboye,” then in the same breath call him a liar, accuse him of hypocrisy, and drag everybody into “fake certificate,” “data boys,” “snatch and grab,” “fraud,” and other recycled mindless street slogans.

If this is not attack, then what exactly do you call it — praise and worship?

This is the Obidient style I was talking about: when argument is required, abuse arrives first.

Let us separate the issues.

Pastor Adeboye did not say Nigeria is secure. He admitted insecurity has worsened. He spoke about terrorism, kidnapping, and the spread of insecurity. He also said security chiefs should be given clear orders and that sponsors of terrorism should be dealt with. The part you people hate is that he said the President cannot personally wear khaki and go to the battlefield.

You can disagree with that. You can say Tinubu must take full responsibility because he is Commander-in-Chief. That is a valid argument.

But instead of making that argument cleanly, you people went into ethnic labelling, personal abuse and religious disrespect.

On your claim that Adeboye castigated Jonathan but now defends Tinubu, I challenge you: bring the exact quote, date and context.

Because the popular evidence people keep circulating is false. That viral photo claiming Adeboye protested against Jonathan has been fact-checked repeatedly. It was not from Jonathan’s era; it was from a 2020 peace walk under Buhari.

In fact, what the public record shows is almost the opposite. Jonathan visited the RCCG camp in 2015 and knelt for prayers. Adeboye prayed for peaceful elections. Around the same period, Jonathan also met Obasanjo in Abeokuta in the presence of Adeboye and Bishop Oyedepo, a meeting widely reported as part of efforts to calm political tensions before the election.

So where exactly is this story that Adeboye “castigated” Jonathan?

This is the usual pattern: invent history, circulate it emotionally, then use it to justify abuse today.

You can disagree with Adeboye’s latest position. That is your right. You can say Tinubu must take more responsibility for insecurity. That is a valid argument. But do not rewrite history to excuse your movement’s standard behaviour of insulting anyone who refuses to echo your anger.

If Adeboye supported or prayed for Jonathan, he was a man of God. If he says something that does not condemn Tinubu in your preferred language, he suddenly becomes a tribal hypocrite.

That is not principle.

That is Obidient intolerance looking for a Bible verse.

Even if he criticised Jonathan before, that does not automatically mean every present statement must be anti-Tinubu to prove consistency. Circumstances, wording and context matter.

And please, enough of this “paid” nonsense. If my argument is false, rebut it. If I lied about Adeboye’s statement, show the lie. If Tinubu’s certificate is your issue, open that thread. Do not run from the topic and hide inside your usual insult basket.

The issue here is simple: can you disagree with a respected religious leader without abusing him?

So far, your answer is no.

CharlesCNG:
The recent attacks on Pastor Enoch Adeboye over his comments on insecurity and President Tinubu reveal something troubling about the Obidient movement: many of them do not merely disagree; they desecrate.

Pastor Adeboye’s point was not that Nigeria is secure. In fact, he admitted that insecurity has worsened and that terrorism and kidnapping have spread from the North into parts of the South. He also urged that security chiefs be given strict marching orders and that sponsors of terrorism should be dealt with. His only offence was saying that once a Commander-in-Chief gives instructions to security agencies, he should not be expected to personally wear khaki and go to the battlefield.

Reasonable people can debate that position. They can say the President must do more. They can argue that command responsibility must be measured by results, not merely by instructions. That is fair.

But what did some Obidients do? As usual, they entered abuse mode. Suddenly, Adeboye became the enemy. A man they once quoted when it suited them became useless because he did not echo their preferred political anger.

Worse still, some now accuse him of ethnic bias, suggesting that he is defending Tinubu simply because Tinubu is Yoruba. This is one of the oldest tricks in Nigerian politics: when you cannot answer a man’s argument, explain his ancestry.

Curiously, this accusation is never applied evenly. If a Yoruba criticises Tinubu, he is praised as courageous and objective. If another Yoruba supports Tinubu, he is dismissed as tribalistic. If a Yoruba elder supports Peter Obi, he is celebrated as detribalised and enlightened. But if a Yoruba pastor says something that does not condemn Tinubu in the language Obidients prefer, he is suddenly an ethnic apologist.

That is intellectual dishonesty.

People support or defend political positions for many reasons: conviction, ideology, policy preference, institutional understanding, personal experience, or yes, sometimes ethnicity. But it is lazy and dishonest to assume tribal motive only when the opinion favours the candidate you oppose.

The real question is not whether Tinubu is Yoruba. The real question is whether Adeboye’s argument is right or wrong. If you disagree, answer the argument. Do not hide behind ethnicity because the facts are inconvenient.

This is the deeper problem. To many Obidients, every institution must bow to their politics: church leaders, traditional rulers, courts, media houses, INEC, security agencies, intellectuals, activists — everybody must either worship at the altar of Obi or be insulted.

That is not democratic engagement. That is political intolerance wearing activism as perfume.

No society grows when every disagreement becomes a licence for abuse. You can disagree with Adeboye without insulting his age, his faith, his office, his ethnicity, or millions who respect him. But restraint is difficult for people who treat politics like a crusade.

The tragedy is that this behaviour keeps pushing decent people away from their cause. They claim to want a new Nigeria, but they attack every voice that refuses to sing from their hymn book.

If Pastor Adeboye must be corrected, correct him with argument.

But if your first response is abuse and ethnic labelling, then the problem is no longer Adeboye’s statement.

The problem is your intolerance.

For when a man cannot answer your argument, he often settles for explaining your tribe. And when facts become inconvenient, ethnicity becomes the emergency exit.

Christistruth03:
Get your facts right!!!!!!!

One Nigeria was Azikiwe's Idea

You went to War 14 year after it was too late to back out when you now saw it was not in your favour as you thought initially !!!

Azikiwe never denied that it was his idea.

Go hold those responsible

DomPerignon:
You own Lagos now?

Ok.

Continue

DomPerignon:
He is a bigot because he is exposing your covetous agenda to take over Lagos