₦airaland Forum

Barcelona are the first team in Liga history not to concede in the first 7 games of the season.

Nice one!
Visca el Barca!

barackohandso:
Make he no worry. Suarez ban don almost finish

Almost? E don finish for my eye sef. Na just 2 matches remain (Eibar and Ajax). Thank God for the international break.

coded01:
E pain Neymar make i no lie...


It's not good to be selfish...

Ahh! E pain me pass my guy (Ney).

barackohandso:
Don't mind that kid. Maybe he needs a little "benching"

E be like say na too much game time dey worry am.

Even with a red card in the early minutes of the second half we couldn't outplay Rayo. Na wa oooooo. The defence did good except Alves of course. Piqué did great today. Keep it up bro. Bartra, Mathieu did good too. Mathieu did great at left back. The midfield was completely owned by Rayo, even with Xaviesta. IMO both played nonsense today. My joy came from the attack who made good use of our chances. As for Munir, I forgive you for that ball. As expected you were supposed to pass to Ney cause it was the best move you would have made.

Anywayz, 3 points in the bag.

homesteady:
Chaii Alves oh!
why am I even surprised?

That guy needs to be shot. Dang!

mkpakanaodogwu:
bro what is funy?

Yes,i was blind when i went, my vision was as clear as an eagle when i
came out

If the above ain't funny, I wonder what is...

Mathieu at left back is interesting...

ojialo:
u come here jump into q matter that you know nothing about...the best thing for u.....is to mind your business did either of us asked u to interfere?

I see...

mkpakanaodogwu:
Yes,i was blind when i went,my vision was as clear as an eagle when i came out

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

vizion:
Wikipedia:

.....In legal definitions for interpersonal status, a single person is
someone who is not in a relationship or is "unmarried". In common
usage, the term single is often used to refer to someone who is not
involved in any type of serious romantic relationship, including long-
term dating, engagement, or marriage. Both single and unmarried people
may participate in dating rituals and other activities to find a long-term
partner or spouse. However, in some cases single people are not
interested in marriage, domestic partnership, or other types of formal,
committed relationships....

An interpersonal relationship is a strong, deep, or close association or
acquaintance between two or more people that may range in duration
from brief to enduring. This association may be based on inference, love,
solidarity, regular business interactions, or some other type of social
commitment. Interpersonal relationships are formed in the context of
social, cultural and other influences. The context can vary from family or
kinship relations, friendship, marriage, relations with associates, work,
clubs, neighborhoods, and places of worship. They may be regulated by
law, custom, or mutual agreement, and are the basis of social groups
and society as a whole.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_person

You did good dropping that. Nice!

Odilafta:
Is that why you can not type properly?

I wonder how people like that cope with reading their own texts.

ronald4lif:
Naso my guy, akpako na turn by turn, now na corper turn

Ha he ha ha ha ha ha ha. So na make OP just lock up be that.

Afrok:
I'll unclad the phone but seriously I find it very hard to check peoples phone except with approval. Even when I was still in a relationship, I hardly do it coz I believe what I see will disturb me, if I check the phone so I better not check and give my mind a benefit of doubt that something like that doesn't exist

For me, I have never done that before. Even while I was in all the relationships I had been, never was there a time that I took a lady's phone. What for? That's just redundant to me.

Anyone good in summary?

donsalvy:
If we all follow your techniques, those who can't read will remain single all their lives.

Someone like me... Little wonder I am single.

justmag:
I wonder myself to..there are some age differences that makes sense and some that jusy don't at all.. .if a 21 year old girl dates a 29 or 30 year old..that sounds fine to me but when a 24 or 25 year old wants to date a 45 or 46 year old!! Dat right there is beyond me...I never get that!

The latter is sugar-daddying... Seems unreasonable to me

chimerase2:
Can I get de summary frm any good samarittan

Hoping for same too.

benizu:
Well said .........

Thanks bruv...

ronald4lif:
How else do you want to be told she's moved on with a fellow corper.

So you mean say na corper-shun dey knack akpako abi?

Ehya... It's a pity. What else do you think is logical to do if not to let go? Yeah, I guess it hurts so much that you might not even want to think for a sec that you are letting her go. But hey, let's face reality and not fantasise over anything here. She is gone and gone for good. Just pick yourself up and get on with your life. Eventually, she might realise later on that she made a mistake by dropping you by the roadside. Although it might be late then. All the same, such is life.

But I feel you should have seen this coming. Unless you were not observant enough to see the inscriptions on the wall.

ojialo:
is she really single? bros parkwell!!!!

Why not leave it to her...? Let's be reasonable here. If she ain't actually single, that shouldn't be your concern. Haba!

PedroJP:
Wat about infidelity, bad tempered and other bad characters inherent in one of d parties dat can dismiss d union ?

You are right, but that's another phase of the fight to curtail these predicaments that arise in relationships (or marriages). First things first, infidelity, bad temper etcetera surfaces even with the right mindset, but you will agree with me that there will be less of problems if we go into these unions for the right reasons (purpose), at the right time (readiness, either mentally, financially or otherwise) and with the right persons (someone that suits you well, one you know you can get along with at all times). Of course there would be problems, but then it would be less if these aforementioned are in place before going into a relationship.

iceberylin:
ŤŐŐ MÁŃŶ ŔĔĹÁŤĨŐŃŚĤĨP ĔЖPĔŔŤŚ ŐŃ ŃĹ

I guess if there were lesser problems, then the amount of experts springing up would be lesser cause they would obviously have lesser problems to tackle or analyse. But as it seems, the problem is worsening as the day go.

A lot are happening these days and it's paramount to adress some (if not most) of the common issues that destroy relationships and/or marriages nowadays. I am with the OP on this. Very many people go into relationships and marriages for the wrong reasons. This issue itself has been over-emphasised, but then, are the changes coming in? Nah... One would think that for an issue of this sort that has been over flogged time and time again, it would have helped in reducing the amount of people out there who still go into these unions for reasons that negate what they actually need. Yet, as much as it has been over flogged, the amount of people who still go into such relationships (or even marriages as the case may be) keep increasing drastically.

Well, much has been said and people are still doing their utmost best to say more. Anyone who is wise enough would pay heed to these and learn to do things for the right reasons. Not just about relationships and/or marriages, but also about things in other facet of life.

ojialo:
look at u.... telling me to grow up!!!! what u exhibited here does it show any sign of maturity in you? telling the whole world that you are single.... SMH...for u. #caseclosd

Sorry, what is wrong with that? Afterall that's what the thread is for.

sebod: As long as Pedro doesn't start the match, I am ok! Munir too should start either because he will be bullied all day.

Lol... Pedro your guy.

sebod: Nice one bro! But I can see Suarez starting the match!

I can bet he won't start. And personally, I won't start him. Well, we will definitely see what it turns out to be.

barackohandso: In other news

Just 3 more goals and Messi will equal la liga's record goalscorer. Hmmmn

Hopefully he gets 2 goals tomorrow. I know Rayo won't be a work-over, but it doesn't stop us from winning.

If Ibra were to be available for that match, Lucho would have started Piqué ahead of Masche to compensate for the lack of height of Masche and to be able to stand a better chance against PSG (in terms of height) with Ibra and Cavani very tall players, not to mention Luis, Marquinhos, and the likes of others who are tall players.

He (Lucho) sacrificed height for speed since Ibra was absent. I would say it was a poor decision on his part going by the conditions in place because he didn't consider other players aside Ibra who are tall too albeit not as tall as Ibra. Cavani is tall. And so is Luis, Marquinhos, Moura-Pastore-Veratti (not really sure about them though).

Anyway, like I stated before, we need to have varying tactics and strategies for different games. You can't play Granada this same way and expect it to work the same way against Madrid. I can bet it that in the Classico, Carlo would most certainly play a double-pivot to compensate for the absence of the veteran "Alonso". Why would he do that? Because Barca ain't Cordoba, Villareal or even Sociedad. He would alter his approach to better suit his team and to counter the approach of his opposition (Barca in this case). This is what I expect also when we play the big boys. Infact, to counter Madrid's plan as regards taking us on the break with just a few of our players at the back, I would play a double pivot of Masch-Busi. In this case, Masche especially would help to shield the backline while Busi does his normal job of breaking play and helping out in attack more with some forward passes. Added to this two would be Rakitić-Xavi or Iniesta, while we play two men up front in Neymessis.

Depending on the outcome of the game, it can later be altered with the inclusion of Luis suárez later on in the game(I'm very sure he won't be a starter in that match).

Lucho, what we need is tactical variation with less predictability.

sebod: Honestly, after watching his exploit at the world cup, I never thought any coach would still play him as a defender. I just wish Lucho could go back to the world cop clips for a clue!

Busi suits the tiki-taka system well more than anyone. If we are to alter that system, I feel there is need also to alter the personnel that are much clinched to the system. If we are to take a more direct approach, Masche would be the man no doubt about that. But if we are to stick with tiki-taka as it were, then Masche displacing Busi would almost be impossible (at least for now).

I see no reasons why we can't create variant tactics as the game demands. Against a team like Madrid and the likes of Chelsea, Athletico and maybe City, I would play Masche in DM (irrespective of who else plays). Having someone like him to shield the back two (cause we don't have back four as our full backs are actual wingers in the real world) would really make a lot of sense and would bring abiut shield and steel to our backline.

Imagine the prospect of playing Masche in front of Bartra-Mathieu or Piqué-Mathieu. It gives an added assurance that the backline is as safe as being in heaven.

[quote author=barackohandso post=/post/26831400]Yeah right. Pique should pair mathieu in our next match. Vermaelen though…when is he returning sef? :-/

BTW didn't Pep start the mascheano in defence thingy?[/quote]Vermaelen still training individually. Na wa ooooooo. After getting the medical all-clear.

Yeah Pep started it.

Sehindemi: Nice advice hun..

But U rlly know wat they call Common sense?
Y didn't U use it initially den??
Y actin curious on wat U already know?

Oh U were expectin me to put up a whole novel just to prove wat I said?

C'ommon bro!
stop being too serious..
Life z full of fun &so is NL!!!

I see...