Seriously am concerned,hw did u measure ur i.q. i know the formular bt i am convinced that a standard test is required.so which one in particular did u take.many psychometry journals still consider 140 vry much below wat a genius should be.

i learnt, there are chances of d student being retained especially if his master exams are excellent bt i still hav friend who ar first class astrophysics 4rm u.n.n who were nt given dis chance. i think it requires something bigger, especially 4 prestigious universities,u can increase u chances by studying 4 ur masters abroad

That view is to me narrow-minded,am new in dis forum,so i stand 2 be corrected.as far as i understand the human psyche,its behaviour and consistent interaction with reality is influenced by 4 principal elements;intuition,feeling,sensation& thinking, dis 4 are some how mangled in composition dat 1 is hardly without d subtle influence of d other, am saying dat ur decision being solely logical as u think is but an illusion.many great thinkers have fallen 4 dis illusion, socrates,max planck.i can explain if u insist.

I consider Frederick sanger a befiting personality for dis list being the only 2times nobel laurate afta shockley,bratain & berdeen.it should be noted he was not offered d peace price, bt solely 4 pure intellectual work.no list of renown achievers even with d least scientific undertone would exclude dis tall figure. especially if objectivity be d watch word!