₦airaland Forum

Hello, if u want to learn how make yoghurt and flavoured drinks and.make money from it this year, you can reach me on my whatsapp account or call so that we can talk more about it. Only the serious minded people not for people that want to take it as fun. U call me on this number 09034761028. thanks

Mumu set of people. And later u
ppl will come out to preach CHANGE to we Nigerians.

pls bro, can I get a copy? mail me at alphonsussunday8@gmail.com

pls Bro, can I lay my hand on a copy? Mail me at alphonsussunday8@gmail.com

The Election Petitions Tribunal hearing
matters arising from the Osun State
governorship election of August 9, 2014 is
set to deliver its final judgment on Friday,
January 6.
Secretary
of
the
Tribunal,
Mr.
Adamu
Aliyu,
confirmed
the
date
on the telephone to our correspondent in
Osogbo, Osun State capital, on Wednesday.
“The judgement is coming up on Friday,
February 6,” he said.
The governorship candidate of the Peoples
Democratic Party, Iyiola Omisore, had
dragged Governor Rauf Aregbesola of the
All Progressives Congress to the tribunal.
Chairman of the panel, Justice Elizabeth
Ikpejime, had on January 23, during the
adoption of written addresses by all
parties, adjourned indefinitely for the final
judgment.
The PDP candidate, who came second in the
election with 292,747 votes against
Aregbesola’s 394,684 votes, prayed the
tribunal to sack the governor and declare
him the winner of the poll.
Omisore’s counsel, Dr. Alex Izinyon (SAN),
had told the tribunal during the address
stage that Aregbesola admitted that he
scored 234,971 votes, and not the 394,684
credited to him by the Independent National
Electoral Commission.
Chief Akin Olujinmi (SAN), who represented
Aregbesola, explained that the governor did
not admit scoring less than the number of
votes credited to him.
He stated that what the table meant was
that “assuming with our conceding that the
tribunal cancel the result in the disputed
units, the first respondent would still have
won with the new figure.”
He argued that the petitioner failed to
prove his petition.
The counsel referred to the objection of the
first respondent to the petition at the
hearing stage, saying he adopted the two
applications filed to challenge the
competence of the petition.
Based on this, Aregbesola’s counsel urged
the panel to strike out the petition.
The counsel argued that the petitioner
dumped the ballot papers used for the
election and other electoral materials on
the tribunal without demonstrating to the
panel how they related to the case.
He further stated that the duplicate copies
of Form EC8A tendered by the petitioner
were inadmissible, and that those who
tendered them were not the makers of the
documents.
Counsel for the All Progressives Congress,
Mr. Rotimi Akeredolu (SAN) also urged the
tribunal to dismiss the petition by Omisore.
Akeredolu adopted APC’s written address
and at the same time adopted the
arguments of the first respondent in the
case.
He also said that he was not opposed to
the objections raised by the first and third
respondents in their written addresses,
adding that the suggestion of the petitioner
that the APC did not have locus in the case
was strange.
Akeredolu argued that the purported
certified true copies of documents
tendered did not conform to the provisions
of the law.
He said that the documents were not listed
nor pleaded and those who tendered them
were not the makers.
Counsel to the Independent National
Electoral Commission, Mr. Ayotunde
Ogunleye, had adopted the same argument
by the first two respondents in the case.
Ogunleye had said that nobody came before
the panel to give evidence that they were
disenfranchised during the poll.
He further said that Omisore had failed to
prove the burden of proof shifted to him
and that his petition should be dismissed.

The Election Petitions Tribunal hearing
matters arising from the Osun State
governorship election of August 9, 2014 is
set to deliver its final judgment on Friday,
January 6.
Secretary
of
the
Tribunal,
Mr.
Adamu
Aliyu,
confirmed
the
date
on the telephone to our correspondent in
Osogbo, Osun State capital, on Wednesday.
“The judgement is coming up on Friday,
January 6,” he said.
The governorship candidate of the Peoples
Democratic Party, Iyiola Omisore, had
dragged Governor Rauf Aregbesola of the
All Progressives Congress to the tribunal.
Chairman of the panel, Justice Elizabeth
Ikpejime, had on January 23, during the
adoption of written addresses by all
parties, adjourned indefinitely for the final
judgment.
The PDP candidate, who came second in the
election with 292,747 votes against
Aregbesola’s 394,684 votes, prayed the
tribunal to sack the governor and declare
him the winner of the poll.
Omisore’s counsel, Dr. Alex Izinyon (SAN),
had told the tribunal during the address
stage that Aregbesola admitted that he
scored 234,971 votes, and not the 394,684
credited to him by the Independent National
Electoral Commission.
Chief Akin Olujinmi (SAN), who represented
Aregbesola, explained that the governor did
not admit scoring less than the number of
votes credited to him.
He stated that what the table meant was
that “assuming with our conceding that the
tribunal cancel the result in the disputed
units, the first respondent would still have
won with the new figure.”
He argued that the petitioner failed to
prove his petition.
The counsel referred to the objection of the
first respondent to the petition at the
hearing stage, saying he adopted the two
applications filed to challenge the
competence of the petition.
Based on this, Aregbesola’s counsel urged
the panel to strike out the petition.
The counsel argued that the petitioner
dumped the ballot papers used for the
election and other electoral materials on
the tribunal without demonstrating to the
panel how they related to the case.
He further stated that the duplicate copies
of Form EC8A tendered by the petitioner
were inadmissible, and that those who
tendered them were not the makers of the
documents.
Counsel for the All Progressives Congress,
Mr. Rotimi Akeredolu (SAN) also urged the
tribunal to dismiss the petition by Omisore.
Akeredolu adopted APC’s written address
and at the same time adopted the
arguments of the first respondent in the
case.
He also said that he was not opposed to
the objections raised by the first and third
respondents in their written addresses,
adding that the suggestion of the petitioner
that the APC did not have locus in the case
was strange.
Akeredolu argued that the purported
certified true copies of documents
tendered did not conform to the provisions
of the law.
He said that the documents were not listed
nor pleaded and those who tendered them
were not the makers.
Counsel to the Independent National
Electoral Commission, Mr. Ayotunde
Ogunleye, had adopted the same argument
by the first two respondents in the case.
Ogunleye had said that nobody came before
the panel to give evidence that they were
disenfranchised during the poll.
He further said that Omisore had failed to
prove the burden of proof shifted to him
and that his petition should be dismissed.
Related

Amen. This is what I av been waiting for. welcome 2015

am intrested... mail me at oguchesunday8@gmail.com