Emmatdayo's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Emmatdayo's Profile › Emmatdayo's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 (of 47 pages)
Untainted007:he rili needs to go on this trip, it will rili help our energy sector |
Which home town is this ![]() |
nice 1 |
eksu ![]() |
. |
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission told Justice Baba Yusuf of a Federal Capital Territory High Court in Maitama, Abuja, on Wednesday that the immediate past National Security Adviser, Col. Sambo Dasuki (retd), refused to be brought to court for his trial. The EFCC is prosecuting Dasuki and his co-accused − a former Director of Finance and Administration in the NSA office, Shuaibu Salisu and a former General Manager, Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation, Aminu Babakusa − on 19 counts of diversion of N32bn meant for arms procurement. Two companies – Acacia Holdings Limited and Reliance Referral Hospital Limited – belonging to Babakusa are also being accused. Justice Yusuf had on February 8 fixed Wednesday for trial to begin after dismissing the application by Dasuki, seeking an order prohibiting the EFCC from further prosecuting him on account of his continued detention. However, on Wednesday, Dasuki, who had remained in the custody of the Department of State Services since December 29, 2015, was not produced in court. His two lead counsel, Messrs Joseph Daudu (SAN) and Ahmed Raji (SAN), were also absent from court. But lead prosecuting counsel, Mr. Rotimi Jacobs, informed the judge that Dasuki refused to be brought to court because the senior lawyers defending him would not be present in court on Wednesday. “The first defendant said he would not be in court unless he is abducted because his lead counsel, J.B Daudu and Ahmed Raji, were not going to be in court,” Jacobs said. Jacobs said Daudu had informed him of an application for stay of the proceedings of the trial which was filed before the Court of Appeal on behalf of the former NSA. He maintained that the law never stopped an accused person in detention from facing trial. He also alleged that Dasuki’s lawyers had deliberately refused to visit their client in the DSS’ custody so that they could continue to use the excuse of lack of access to hom (Dasuki) as an excuse to frustrate the case. Jacobs said, “When a defendant is in custody, the counsel should be allowed access to the defendant. “I asked the DSS whether the lawyers ever made attempt to see him, they said they never did. It is a deliberate plant to frustrate the trial.” Counsel who represented Dasuki in court on Wednesday, Mr. Wale Balogun, however debunked the allegation that his client refused to be brought to court. He said, “Concerning the allegation, the defence lawyer is not aware of it. The defendant is not in court. He has not been produced. It is the requirment of the law that he should be here. The proecution has not applied for the accused to be excused form court. “The DSS official should have deposed to an affidavit to that effect.” The other defence lawyers, including Mr. Solomon Umoh (SAN), said the matter could not proceed due to Dasuki’s absence. Justice Yusuf adjourned the case till April 6. Another judge of the FCT High Court in Maitama, Abuja, Justice Peter Affen, before whom, Dasuki and others are being prosecuted for alleged diversion of N19bn arms fund had fixed April 20 and 22 for trial. Justice Affend had fixed the date for trial after dismissing another application by Dasuki to stop his trial on account of his continued detention. Dasuki’s co-accused with respect to the case includes a former Director of Finance and Administration in the Office of the NSA, Shuaibu Salisu, and a former Minister of State for Finance, Bashir Yuguda. The other co-accused are, a former Governor of Sokoto State, Attahiru Bafarawa, the ex-governor’s son, Sagir Attahiru, and a firm, Dalhatu Investment. Meanwhile Justice Adeniyi Ademola of the Federal High Court in Abuja had also fixed April 4 for ruling on similar application filed by Dasuki to stop his trial on four counts of money laundering and illegal possession of firearms http://www.punchng.com/dasuki-refused-to-be-brought-to-court-%E2%88%92-efccs-lawyer/ |
yungshallgrow:nd 4 london na only booger,pizza and chips them sabi ![]() |
Nigerian humour is a good way to pass through tough times, as Alex Iwobi must have learnt in the past couple of days. After the Arsenal forward came down with food poisoning and missed Tuesday morning’s training with the Super Eagles in Abuja, team mates rallied round him with encouraging words, according to team media officer Toyin Ibitoye. However, the older players did not fail to point out that he was the architect of his own problems by choosing to consume pepper soup in camp knowing he has a ‘soft stomach’. Iwobi was born in Nigeria but was raised in England where there is less emphasis on consumption of chili pepper in meals, unlike in Nigeria where chili is a staple in several dishes. Yet other reports claim that Iwobi’s ailment was caused by the consumption of salad at the team’s hotel. Midfielder Ogenyi Onazi seems to have taken the youngster under his wings while Chelsea’s John Obi Mikel threw a bottle of water in a playful banter at the Arsenal man during a break in training on Tuesday evening. After overcoming the crisis and having a short physical examination by the team’s physio in Kaduna, Iwobi later confirmed via Twitter that the worst was over. “Had the maddest food poisoning but I am good now and feeling ready for the Egyptian match,” he wrote. The young man must have learnt his lessons, never underestimate the power of pepper soup or Nigerian salad. He would hope to make it all count against Egypt on Friday. http://www.goal.com/en-ng/news/17102/extra-time/2016/03/23/21615402/alex-iwobis-soft-stomach-is-cause-for-pepper-soup-jokes-in?ICID=HP_HN_5
|
OP abeg show me fayose in that pic oo |
.STOKE CITY:that student bully that will not read nor listen in class and will also not let other student read and listen in class ![]() |
LA CLICK LA ...... ![]() |
no be iwobi way chop poison be dat? ![]() |
DonBobes:watin? ![]() |
pyyxxaro:u better dnt put ur self in a life time problem ![]() |
na to start dey hawk recharge card from street to street be that oo ![]() |
omo this is real love |
this girls wowo oooo |
looks better without make up ![]() |
. |
this syrians they are allowing to enter europe, na big problem ooo |
i dnt agree with no 6 |
![]() |
hmmmmm nt me oo, hav never seen smthing like that b4 ![]() make any bastard no quote me oo ![]() |
oya cucumber crew girls, make una enter o, OP dun bring work 4 una ![]() |
praizeblog: amen |
![]() |
Justice Okon Abang of a Federal High Court in Abuja on Thursday denied the petition written against him by the National Publicity Secretary of the Peoples Democratic Party, Chief Olisa Metuh, asking for the transfer of his corruption trial to another judge. The judge disclosed in the open court on Thursday that one of Metuh’s lawyers, Mr. Emeka Etiaba (SAN), had sent a petition to the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, Justice Ibrahim Auta, asking for the reassignment of the case to another judge. The judge disclosed this while considering an application by one of Metuh’s lawyers, Mr. Ifedayo Adedipe (SAN), asking for an adjournment due to the absence of the leader of the defence team, Dr. Onyechi Ikpeazu (SAN), who was said to be on a trip to the University of Ilorin for an eye surgery. Justice Abang said he never knew Metuh to be his classmate in the law school as alleged in the petition sent to the chief judge. Justice Abang also denied the allegation that he deliberately held back the record of the proceedings of the trial from the defence team. The judge, who said he would resist any blackmail, insisted that despite the petition written against him by Etiaba, apparently on Metuh’s instructions, he would continue to hear the case except if the Chief Judge directed otherwise. He said, “I want to say that I have a circular by my employer, the National Judicial Council, that where there is a petition in a matter seeking the transfer of a case to another judge, that the judge handling the case shall continue to preside over the matter until a decision is taken by the authority that the petition was addressed to. “On account of this circular, I shall continue to preside over this matter until the honourable Chief Judge of this court takes a decision on Emeka Etiaba’s petition.” The judge faulted Etiaba for failing to serve the petition on the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, which is prosecuting the case, so as to enable it to respond to the application. The judge said Etiaba’s act of serving a letter with respect to a pending case on the Chief Judge without serving it on the other party was a breach of Rule 30(5) of the Rules of Code of Conduct for Legal Practitioners. The judge said, “The prosecution ought to have been availed with that letter so that they could also be heard before the Chief Judge takes a decision on the petition. It is not only the defence that is entitled to justice. “The Federal Republic of Nigeria and the defendants are also entitled to justice. Emeka Eitiaba ought to have served a copy of that letter on the prosecution so that they would have the opportunity to react to the view expressed by him. “There are three grounds in the letter – one: that some of the decisions the court took were given in favour of the prosecution; two: that the court refused to release the record of proceedings. The record of proceedings has been released to the defendants two days ago. It comprises 212 pages.” Metuh and his company, Destra Investments Limited, who are being prosecuted by the EFCC, were scheduled to open their defence on Thursday. The accused persons are being prosecuted on seven counts of fraud bordering on the N400m which they allegedly received from the Office of the National Security Adviser as well as money laundering involving cash transaction of $2m. But responding to a similar question put across to him by the judge, Adedipe, who led the defence on Thursday, said, “Any letter written by any member of the defence counsel is a decision of the defence team.” The judge subsequently granted Adedipe’s application for adjournment and fixed March 23 for Metuh to open his defence. The judge noted that the case had already been adjourned three times before Thursday at the instance of the defence. He warned the defence team to be mindful of section 396(4) of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act which he said prohibits parties in a criminal trial from taking more than five adjournments. http://www.punchng.com/judge-denies-metuhs-petition-vows-to-continue-trial/
|
TippyTop:they were not employed under buharis administration |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 (of 47 pages)


