MuttleyLaff: Be deceiving yourself there. What soil was Adam made from? Is it black or red soil?
Reddish brown cuts right across the Caucasoid, Negroid and Mongoloid spectrum, lmao. You have reddish brown in each racial class.
It is so because he isn't black skinned as Sudanese/Nubians/Ethiopians do are, duh
The whole point is just to wipe out the facts that have been sticked to ur stubborn minds...all this is just a result of migration nd forceful movement
Now would u say that this brown skin is a result of sun or maybe some other occurrence u might want to come up with...Muttlylaff you just don't seem to understand that you are being the devil here....if black or brown skin was caused by sun rays maybe everyone in Europe wout be black or probably brown like u say....nd u are also forgetting that these white people took us as slaves, they most possibly would take black woman as sex dolls then get them pregnant....noew u see how thtse brown skin people came right
[img]https://s3/images/ObamaMuttley.gif[/img] Who are you saying, is white? Who are you saying, is a descendant of white "Arabs"? Is Adam, according to your understanding, white or black? Was king David, Esau and others grieving or crying when they were/are described as ruddy (i.e. reddish brown skinned)?[/quote
Adam was a black man....no two ways about it He was made from soil
MuttleyLaff: Baba you are contradicting yourself here. Make up your mind please. Whats the meaning of "Adam was what we'd call a black man today" and "Even science attests to the fact with an image of a true reddish brown man"
Let me re-ask you again: 1/ Is Adam, according to your understanding, white or black? 2/ Does the word Adam mean red earth or not? 3/ Was king David, Esau and others grieving or crying when their skin complexion were/are described as ruddy (i.e. reddish brown skinned)? 4/ Do you agree that there are light to dark spectrum of being reddish brown skinned
Well...u really need to do some research on your own....ur reasons to counter are not solid
You miserable liar Mutttleylaff. Did I not warn you about this oyinbo you are following? You have been disgraced once again. Now you're chewing your tongue upandan like a mad man. You're now used to it... I said before that you and your ilk don't have any shame at all.
Eyaah... What will you and that idiot macof now do about the Subsaharan Africa E1B1A DNA of Rameses III of 20th Dynasty? Macof's case is even more pathetic because he thinks humans came out of the ground at different locations around the world, including his village.
MuttleyLaff: Half knowledge is worse than ignorance and half baked knowledge is always dangerous. It's guaranteed to lead to disaster
Fyi, black Egyptian Pharaohs (i.e. Nubians) didnt come about before the 25th Dynasty, and there were only 4 to 5 of them altogether that ever reigned. So this your Amenhotep III guy, could never have been a black skinned Pharaoh royalty, because he actually reigned circa 1390–1352 B.C. in the 18th Dynasty right before the Black Egyptian Pharaohs (i.e. Nubians) came on the scene from the Southern Nile region (i.e. Sudanese axis)
Cleopatra, reigned in the Ptolemaic Period, and she certainly as well wasn't black skinned too, lmao
DNA results of Rameses III shows Subsaharan African DNA haplogroup. He reigned during the 20th dynasty and not after 25th you lying devil.
macof: until you can tell your history through your traditional sources you are still ignorant and don't know who you are. Bible and Christian or Jewish narratives can never tell you who you are because you are not from the middle east No matter how you blackwash Israelites Your real black ancestors in Africa you don't know them
Lol.. You are showing statues of pharaohs and you say with those you expect people to know what race jesus was What concerns jesus with any pharaoh?
macof: another slave thinking hating the white man is freedom. You are still doing the white man's bidding which is to denounce your heritage.. Claiming Hebrew doesn't make you free it is even a deeper level of the sunken place
Now show me where I ever called ancient Egypt white mumu
Just saying it is really dumb for people like u to think negative of this... I'm not claiming Israel, I know who I am... Just feeling sorry for some who don't have any idea of their origin
after seeing all these,i expect that no one would still be blind with all these madness of white jesus....everything is clear now, we've been ignorant of who we actully are....think we should open our eyes and stop being fools
macof: I thought we were talking about Isrealites not ancient Egyptians Israelites originate from beyond the euphrates Egyptians have two groups : the northern mostly asiatic group and the southern dominant native African group
But see here for your Israelite look .. Just like any average semite
They always have customers like you who will always believe the whitish version of things. White Jesus and Israel will only go with white Egypt and they know that, hence their lies. but time for lies is over!
macof: And these are native Africans like the kushites referred to in Jeremiah 13:23 "Can an Ethiopian change his skin or a leopard its spots? Neither can you do good who are accustomed to doing evil."
not Israelites
See Israelite here :
Is this one too a native African? Mentuhotep II (Reign: c. 2046 B.C. – 1995 B.C.) Nebhepetre Mentuhotep II was a pharaoh of the 11th dynasty who reigned for 51 years. During the 39th year on the throne, he reunited Egypt, thus ending the First Intermediary Period. Consequently, he is considered the first pharaoh of the Middle Kingdom. https://i.pinimg.com/564x/b3/20/d2/b320d28ac7b90aa3a9bae7f7737d60ae.jpg they break their noses and lips, so brainwashed fools can still have something to say.
donnie: SHABBAT SHALOM to the twelve tribes of Israel scattered around the world.
A 30 minute Shabbat class to help us understand the times we are in, what direction we ought to be taking, and what the plan of YAH is for ISREAL's redemption.
donnie: King Seti - one of the most well preserved in all ancient Egyptian history. He died 3,298 years ago and ruled when Egypt was at one of its most affluent peaks. He was the father of most famous Pharaohs of all time. When he died Egyptian mummification was at its absolute peak of perfection and he is often regarded as the most well-preserved mummy in the world.
My people, na oyinbo be this?[/quot][quote author=donnie post=90951885]There seems to be no limits to your buffoonery. Most of the inhabitants of sub-saharan Africa migrated through Egypt/lower Egypt/Nubia/Ethiopia. But somehow you believe your ancestors came out of the ground in your village playground.
think its time we open our eyes o. And embrace the truth
donnie: I can only imagine what is going through the minds of majority of Evangelical Christians. They were taught that they will all escape through through rapture before calamity begins to befall the earth.
Reason they preached feel good messages which they call faith and told many other lies to the children of ISRAEL. The lies told by gentile preachers knew no bounds. Even Hollywood helped them, producing films like the Left Behind series, driving the deception deeper.
It is now time to pay, the judgements of YAH have begun to fall on the nations and Christians are still here.
And yes, it matters that you know Jesus was a negro, because that will help you know who the chosen people of YAHUAH are. This judgement is because of them and only they can call MESSIAH back.
Look at this miserable guy. One of my weakest adversaries on NL. Even Muttleylaff responded to him. That one dey support anything aimed at me, even stone. What do you want to do with the information, hmm? Did you not read about the privacy rules on this forum? Do you want to take my news to newspapers? Or you want to form a stupid theory? Abi is that the explanation for all the lies you have been posting here on NL in the name of preaching?
Weak arguments... you've always had a weak gospel... now you're looking for a cheap way out of your misery.
donnie: Where did you get that they were never known to be black? You've seen many references but you're still arguing like a blind man.
First, you should understand that it wasn't until the 8th century when the Khazars (Esau) converted to Judaism and began to call themselves Jews, that we had anything outside of black going by that appellation JEW or Israelite. Even references earlier shared here shows they were called European Jews, because they are Europeans from Turkey, Russia and Germany. Besides the negro with sub-saharan Africa DNA, there's no other named Jew outside of these ones. If they are "Jews" and not Negroes, we know from where they originated.
So first it was a reference to only the southern Kingdom, then it was used to refer to all of Israel. Then Esau began to call themselves Jews.
So those who speak about different kind of Jews assimilating and all that are only right in the general sense since they go by what is popular, which includes the whites. Plus that Esau, spared nothing in seeking and gaining power, even in the land of Israel.
The seed of Jacob married among themselves. It was against the commandments to mix. And even when they did, they mostly maintained the paternal seed which determined one's lineage.
The people in those pics lack melanin. They are not the ancient Hebrews. They are Europeans from Turkey (OTOMAN Empire) as you earlier stated.
According to this source, Jews that were expelled by King John the third settled in Guinea, Angola, and the Island of St. Thomas. Source also states that most of the present inhabitants of these regions are descendants of these Jews. Remember it's this same region where the Transatlantic slave trade took place. Esau knew exactly who they were taking for slaves.
See also a map of Guinea, so you know who exactly those many descendants are.
Clear and precise!
Don't mind him. He has dodged the references which clearly show Jews were black/very dark, now he is back and wants to accuse others of what he is actually doing. Who is the one arguing blindly hmm?
Watch him dodge these references to Jews populating the region of guinea.
MuttleyLaff: I have always maintained that there were mongrelised black skinned exiles in Africa but with a lost sense of their tribes' identity.
Those aren't white skinned Jews. Those are pictures of Sephardic Jews. It is the Ashkenazi Jews who are white-skinned Jews, from being of Caucasian and Japheth's descendants
Yea right, the blacks are mongelized exiles, no mention of the word Jews or Israelites.
But then, you happily call the white-skinned Ashkenazi Jews. You are not well, and the problem runs deep.
Even the Sephardic (from Spain and Portugal) that were known to be black/very dark, you are using pictures of white people to represent them.
MuttleyLaff: I have always maintained that there were mongrelised black skinned exiles in Africa but with a lost sense of their tribes' identity.
Those aren't white skinned Jews. Those are pictures of Sephardic Jews. It is the Ashkenazi Jews who are white-skinned Jews, from being of Caucasian and Japheth's descendants
The true pure Jews are black and have negro features. They resemble the other negroes in every respect as to physical characteristics. Deceive not yourselves.
OkCornel: Of course, integrity is not passing off Siddi tribes as 'Indian Israelites'
[s]I have asked a basic question which you bungled like your Sudan/Yudan theory.
The pictures of the 'Indian Israelites' you posted earlier, where is the link/source labelling those Indians in the picture as 'Indian Israelites'?[/s]
Kindly disprove this reference to black Jews in India as lies or forever be silent.
MuttleyLaff: Smh. Please remember that I did say, I have a personal copy of "Christian researches in Asia:" by Claudius Buchanan in my e-library and don't mind discussing the content
Smh, Claudius Buchanan never made mention of any Siddi tribe as Indian Israelites, in the entirety of the book.
He mentioned the white Jews and the mongrelised black Jews. You can start from page 164, to read in details and elaborately, on all the efforts Claudius Buchanan made in his going about trying to find out who the white Jews and black Jews in India were. Furthermore, the black Jews never in that book, told Claudius Buchanan, that they came from the African Siddi tribe, when he asked them about their Jewish origin, lmao. Please take it easy this morning ooo.
eplanning: Will you shut up your mouth, you crook. Didn't he ask for reference pointing to Indian Isrealites? And I have given him the reference period. Why are you frightened? Disprove that reference to BLACK Isrealites in India and stop wailing.
Most Christian researchers are simply brianwashed. There was forcefully conversion of Edomites (Khazars) to the Hebrew faith in the 8th century. These whites are the ones who later called themselves Jews. They are not blood descendants of Jacob.
They called the ones in the pictures SIDDIS, but they are Isrealites... Bantus taken into captivity. They fulfil the curses of Deuteronomy 28. You're just too simple-minded.
You have tried your best to make your position very fluid. You'll sway in any direction as long as it is against the idea that Jews were black. When it suits you, you agree with Donnie that Askenazi and not Biblical Isrealites but when it has to do with opposing the idea of black ISRAEL, you happily share pics of Khazzars, Ashkenazi as Jews. When you are choked you declare that there is no true Isrealite existing and they've all been mixed, erased etc. You will disgust any right-thinking person.
MuttleyLaff: [size=8pt]Where are the pictures showing Indian Israelites? What exactly is the point you're trying to make with the book? After first posting misleading pictures, you now remember that integrity is a virtue.
You're now signposting people to a book after you were informed by OkCornel that your misleading pictures of Indian Israelites are not Indian Israelites but are actually the Siddi tribe, an Indo-African tribal community that descended from the Bantu peoples of Africa and settled in India in the 7th century (i.e. the lost African tribe in India)
Will you shut up your mouth, you crook. Didn't he ask for reference pointing to Indian Isrealites? And I have given him the reference period. Why are you frightened? Disprove that reference to BLACK Isrealites in India and stop wailing.
Most Christian researchers are simply brianwashed. There was forcefully conversion of Edomites (Khazars) to the Hebrew faith in the 8th century. These whites are the ones who later called themselves Jews. They are not blood descendants of Jacob.
They called the ones in the pictures SIDDIS, but they are Isrealites... Bantus taken into captivity. They fulfil the curses of Deuteronomy 28. You're just too simple-minded.
You have tried your best to make your position very fluid. You'll sway in any direction as long as it is against the idea that Jews were black. When it suits you, you agree with Donnie that Askenazi are not Biblical Isrealites but when it has to do with opposing the idea of black ISRAEL, you happily share pics of Khazzars, Ashkenazi as Jews. When you are choked you declare that there is no true Isrealite existing and they've all been mixed, erased etc. You will disgust any right-thinking person.
Kei144, FemiEddy, donnie, aadoiza hope y'all can see this crook?
[size=8pt]Sudan's lost Jewish community - in pictures A recent call by a minister in Sudan's new government for Jewish people to return to the country and reclaim citizenship has shone a light on a small but once-thriving community.
Oral historian Daisy Abboudi, herself descended from Sudanese Jews, has been talking to members of the community and collecting their photographs.
David Gabra can still remember the exact date he left Sudan. "Twenty fifth of May 1965," he said with certainty when talking about his departure. At that time, things were getting increasingly difficult for Jewish people because of growing anti-Semitism. "There was chaos... I remember one time we closed ourselves up in our home, and they were throwing stones at us, at our home." David decided he could no longer stay in the country https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-49728912
Seven of the eight names belonged to a group of Sephardic families and only the single Ashkenazi family of Mendel (Arabized Mandeel) was documented. The document may have been drawn even without the knowledge of the Jewish families[/b]. http://www.jewishmag.com/138mag/jews_ottoman_sudan/jews_ottoman_sudan.htm
PS: PLEASE TURN YOUR SMARTPHONE OR TABLET SIDEWAYS TO LANDSCAPE MODE, IN ORDER TO PROPERLY ENJOY VIEWING THOSE JEWS OF SOUDAN PICTURES
OkCornel: I’m very curious, please can you share your links/sources to these pictures of Indian Israelites?
I’ve checked the internet and didn’t see this.
Please MuttleyLaff, Maximus69, eplanning and Donnie. Can you all do a quick google search on ‘Indian Israelites’, go to the pictures and see what pops up, it's different.
eplanning, your picture of Indian Israelites are actually the siddi tribe, the lost african tribe in India, and not Indian Israelites.
Please verify with images.google.com.
Hope you won't be too lazy to look up source this time. Integrity is a virtue.
Here's the link to the book. Page CVI describes the Jews of Soudan. I had to search for this for you. You're all so lazy. Only know how to sit around and blab like drunkards without sense.
OkCornel: No link/sources to back up your Sudan/Yudan theory?
Look them up yourself. Some of these books and journals cost thousands of dollars.
OkCornel: Can you provide us with the links to your source? I have shown you mine. If you want many more links asserting my position, I can happily provide.
Now the ball is in your court. Provide links and sources to this Sudan/Yudan theory of yours.
MuttleyLaff: Even this mainstream source references some of the West African Isrealite kingdoms but concluded with.. "These communities continued to exist for hundreds of years but have since disappeared due to changing social conditions, persecution, migration, and assimilation."
Christianity Etc › Re: The Egypt Hollywood Never Shows You by eplanning: 10:27am On Jun 24, 2020
Shabbat shalom
