₦airaland Forum

A clown wants me not to mention him but makes references to me. You are still ignored.

Procashtips:
You didn't really do justice to my question.

If you type maltreatments of dark Africans into Google right now, you'll find tens of images, videos and articles of such happening post Gaddafi but little to nothing during his time.

Which speach are you talking about?

We are talking real life experiences from people who lived there, you're talking speech that's likely to have been misinterpreted or taken out of context

Let's get some things clear, I never mentioned maltreatment in any of my post. I used his speech as reference to his disdain/hate for blacks. In that 2010 speech, he asked for an amount to stop "ignorant africans" from turning Europe black. This constitute as hate speech. Secondly, I mentioned an aide of his that says he calls visiting black leaders slaves. Also, your hero Islamic legion metamorphosed later to supporter of APC. Find out what they did in Darfur.

On the issue of killing blacks post Gaddafi, find out why.

Procashtips:
Gaddafi hated dark Africans?

You're very funny though.

Can you please help us with evidences of wildspread maltreatment of dark Africans in Libya during Gaddafi's time?

I want to check something..

At least I'm 100% sure Libya was one of the hotspots for Nigerians wanting to migrate due to the opportunities that filled Libya then.

This is an old nairaland thread: https://www.nairaland.com/612427/why-gaddafi-pan-africanist-when-arabs.

Then also look up his speech when he visited Rome in 2010. That was when I came across his speech. Also look up what his former aide that I quoted here had to say.

Like I said, he was being nice because he wanted something and no other reason.

Ghostagain:
I don't think I need to show you my CV. Speculate on it as you wish.
Now, avoid me, thanks.

Says the fellow that jumped into my mention. You're ignored henceforth.

Ghostagain:
You have no points, you only think you do.
It will take some growing up and some education for you to arrive at the conclusion you had been completely wrong about everything. And I'm not that much interested in conversing with a person whom hasn't mentally evolved enough. I'm not interested in teaching you.

Your only achievement is your masters that you got about the time of his death and those of us that got it before his death should do what? Jump into the lagoon?

You can't continue because your hero has been stripped naked in the market square and shame just won't let you watch.

nigeriansamurai:
lol calm down ... There is a different version of the Gaddafi story is quite different from the popular one that was pushed by western agents (maybe ill make a thread about it)... i knew someone would bring up this point... You are avoiding the bigger question. with all that was said and done, What was the result of killin the so called evil man Gaddafi?

What I wanted to point out is that he is not the kind of leader we should idolise. Someone like sankara who really wanted greatness for his people and walked his talk should be our hero.

PS: it's not about the west. he speaks his mind, I mean Gaddafi. He was friendly with blacks because he wanted to be king of kings of Africa.

Ghostagain:
I'm not a judge, nor a lawyer. I'm smarter than that. I think you are too young and too ignorant to have an intelligent discussion on this topic.

Too young? And you can't refute my points.

Ghostagain:
I'm telling you about what happened which everybody who cared at the time could see with his two eyes, and you are telling me that it is best to ignore reality and focus on the words of one man, those words are supposedly better than reality.
Do you now understand that your reasoning is flawed ?
I think you are too young to know what you are talking about. I already had a master's degree during the NATO war on Libya.

Oh! In your court, witnesses are to be thrown out right? Great judge. What about his speech when he visited Rome in 2010. Hope that also should be thrown outta windows.

Ghostagain:
Gaddafi uplifted black people in Libya so much that those who were trying to kill Gaddafi started many rumors against black people and started killing black people en masse.
Obama paid rebels were literally committing pogroms against black people in Libya and posting the videos on YouTube.
Learn before you make comments.

You are obviously the ignorant one. Find out what Gaddafi’s former chief of Protocol Nuri Al Mismari has to say about his boss view of black African leaders.

Gaddafi plays to the gallery for folks like you to achieve his aim.

nigeriansamurai:
let me tell you a story... Remember Mummar Gaddafi and how he was always protesting against western exploitation, he always advocated for a United western Africa one totally free from the clutches of foregin powers and laws, under his leadership Lybia was a rising power in Africa, ...he was hated by the west and branded a tyrant because he didnt allow western companies like shell and the rest to do the rubbish they do in Nigeria... long story short, the wonderful NATO decided to end him and display his body in a fucking meat locker... Now after the death of the so called evil "Gaddafi the cause of Lybia's bondage and suffering", foregin companies and bodies ran in a beserk frenzy feeding of Lybias resourses, and anarchy took over, now take a look at the liberated Lybia's economy...

Seems you don't know so much about Gaddafi. He never really like the blacks hope you know. If you had talked about Thomas sankara, I'd have agreed with you.

ispreloaded:
If u like fall for this cheap scam.... Alaves vs betis 1-0 correct score cannot be 14odd ....the uselessness cannot get sense

Na why sports scammers love sporty, no evidence.

Vl3ly:
[b]⚫️ ?🇵🇸🏠🇮🇱 ▶️ 🚫 ✔️
WHY ZIONISTS DO NOT HAVE A BIBLICAL CLAIM TO PALESTINIAN LANDS
⚫️ ?🇵🇸🏠🇮🇱 ▶️ 🚫 ✔️

🥶🌇🌲🌲✨ ✍️by Hikaru Kitabayashi🥶🌇🌲🌲✨✍️

Abraham is called a Hebrew in Genesis, so we can assume that the male members of his family were Hebrews, as the Pentateuch describes property inheritance as being patrilineal and not matrilineal. As Abraham is described as leaving his family to devote himself the the worship of a God who was jealous of other Gods, we can assume that other Hebrews of Abraham's time were polytheistic and that the original Hebrews did not practice Judaism.

So what do we know about the language Abraham spoke? We cannot rule out that Abraham, like most people today who live in the poorer regions of the world, was multi-lingual. We can assume that Abraham, in order to survive, had to have been conversant in the Cananite languages of the people he dwelt among, but of the language he spoke in the privacy of his tent with Sarah is something about which we know absolutely nothing. All we can assume is that it was Hebrew, though the Hebrew of Abraham or of other Hebrews at his time, may or may not have been a Semitic language.

If the so-called Kohanim Y-Chromosome haplogroup is representative of the male lineage of Abraham, then the the percentage of the male population of Ansar Allah controlled Yemen with the Kohanim Y-Chromosome is about five times higher than that of the Ashkenazi Zionist population controlling Israel today. And this makes excellent sense. In the time of Mohammed, there were many Jewish tribes in the Arabian Peninsula who represented a powerful political force.

The Kohanim Y-Chromosome, though, has been shown to originate in the area of Georgia, Armenia, and northern Turkey that is not far distant from the Black Sea. And the Biblical description given of the Garden of Eden, if read in the original Hebrew, makes a fairly good match up with this part of the world. Additionally, "Ur of the Chaldees" (Ur Kasdim in Hebrew) does not have to refer to Ur in Sumer. There are also excellent arguments for locating this place in eastern Turkey.

However, the earliest form of Hebrew about which we have certain knowledge is Biblical Hebrew, a Semitic language very closely related to the other known Canaanite languages such as Phoenician and far less so to Arabic. In connection with this DNA research shows that modern Lebanese and Palestinians continue to share a large portion of the DNA of the ancient Canaanites, whereas the modern Ashkenazi tend to have more than half of their DNA being inherited from the Italians and the French they once lived among.

So what does this indicate? It tells us that Abraham's descendants' DNA was quickly Semiticized by the Cananite population of Palestine and Lebanon and later Europeanized during the diaspora. It also tells us that, if Israel belongs to anyone by virtue of descent of the Jewish Kohanim Y-Chromosome in the male-line, then the Yemenis of the Ansar Allah controlled Yemen might very well have the best claim of all. The claims, thus, of most Zionists are not only criminal in terms of natural law but also heretical in terms of the religious law espoused in the Pentateuch.

Where, then, is the religious justification for the ongoing attempts at genocide by the Zionist political entity? There is none.[/b]

So someone sat down to write this nonsense and you copied it and posted it. I wondered who lied to him that Abraham ever lived in the eden region. How did he get abraham chromosomes to start with. When it suits his arguement, he quotes the bible and when it did not, he attacks the same documents. Funny write up.

Kobojunkie:
***Yawn***

Yes, keep yawning. The normal escape route.

Egbonmii:
First of all, what you need to do is, be calming down. In as much as this is new to you, this is not the end of the world. And you need to realize that your dear little brother, that you have known all these years, has not changed one bit overnight. If your brother has always annoyed you, he will still be the annoying type, and not just because he is gay. If you have been close to your brother, there is no reason why this should change.
Being gay is just one aspect of your brother, as in:
My brother is always funny
My brother is very intelligent
My brother is smart
My brother is gay
My brother never makes his bed
My brother does not know how to cook
My brother is the best ever

In other words, the fact that you have come to realize that your brother can only be intimate with someone like him, does not change him one bit from the person that you have always known him to be.
You can take the “holier than thou” attitude and think that he needs to conform with what everyone expects to be “normal” or “proper” behavior. But you can be assured that your brother has tried that even before you came to this realization.
This is certainly a distressing moment for all of you. But it does not have to be, except if you decide to make it so. If you are close to your brother and quite open with him, , you can discuss with him, without necessarily being judgmental. One thing which is sure is that, your brother did not choose this, but as you already noticed, it was already in his genes even before he was born, as you described from his behavior even as a kid. You or your parents could have maltreated him, as many people are suggesting here to make him more “masculine”. But that would have pushed him to pretend to be who he is not, to please you. You might think that, if he marries a woman, everything will be fine and good. But while he can do that to please you, what about the happiness of your brother and of the wife? Because, even though your brother might be “married”, there would be no intimacy in their relationship. I am quite sure it is not what you would wish for your brother.
I am hoping that your brother’s wellbeing is more important to you than what outsiders think of you. This is the moment you have to be present for your brother. You can use this difficult moment to build better relationship and understanding with your brother or you can push him under the “bus”, because you feel that the validation of outsiders is more import ant to you than your relationship with your brother. In which case you might as well throw the first stone or worse still push your brother to kill himself, because he brought “shame” to his family. The choice is yours.
If you are the religious type, do not forget what God said to Peter: “never call unclean what God has called clean” and also the basis of the new covenant: “Go out into the streets and invite ‘ANYONE’ you see on the streets so that there will be people in my feast”. So if God calls your brother clean, you should carefully consider before condemning your brother.

Twisting the scriptures to suit your narrative right? That scripture you quoted about peter was for the gentiles and.never for the homosexuals. Agreed, God loves all men regardless but has now "commanded" all to come to repentance. None exempted. Else why would paul by the Holy Spirit write that homosexuals will not inherit the kingdom of God?

Kobojunkie:
You didn't answer any of the questions. You are looking to assert your ideas even after I had explained what I meant by curses which are laid out in each of God's Laws to befall those who live in disobedience. So, no point going any further abeg! I am already bored. Too early in the year to play meaningless word games with anyone abeg!

Bored? You should be with the teachings passed on to you. You couldn't refute any question passed on to you intelligently. Imagine saying curse equals punishment. Your posts were really laughable. Also you claim that jesus was imperfect even when pointed out that jesus is God.

I bet you don't even pause to process your thoughts but must regurgitate whatever your leader must have taught you regardless of how stupid it sounds.

You really need to start studying the scriptures for yourself as you sound so awkward when you present your regurgitated views.

You are simply incorrigible and probably irredeemable from whatever cult you follow.

Kobojunkie:
I see you did not answer any of the questions I posed. Let's revisit this topic when you are ready, to be honest with yourself in this. This is much too early in the year to be playing useless word games.

I answered all questions raised but with your closed mind, you couldn't absorb them. For you to claim that a curse and punishment is the same shows how you reason which is really too low.

Lifemanage:
Don't look at things in the eye of scriptures but with science.

I'll take a rain check on this suggestion. Thank you.

Kobojunkie:
Sigh...Recall
1. Was the woman judged/punished for her sin against God's Law as stated in Genesis 2? Yes/No

2. Was the man judged/punished for his sin against God's Law as stated in Genesis 2? Yes/No

3. Interesting claim! So, what you are saying is that when Jesus Christ said He came to save those who were condemned/cursed by God to die, Jesus Christ was playing word games? Why did they need saving at all if there was nothing for them to be saved from, to begin with?

So judging someone is the same as placing a curse? You really need to revisit your basics in English language. This is really so funny.

Where in the scripture did jesus say he came to save those cursed by God? I have noticed you have a penchant to quote what jesus never said.

Jesus came to save all mankind both those under the law and those who are not under the law. Man fell when he ate the fruit and jesus came to restore that fall. Man was never cursed if you say he is please provide reference and do not quote gen 3 pls.

Kobojunkie:
As I already explained,
◍ All who are born of woman are born under the curse of God in Genesis 3 vs 16-24. To dispute this, you have to provide Scripture to support your claim, this exemption which you pretend you can claim for Jesus Christ.
◍ The curse is punishment for sin, and not sin itself.

2. How is that curse different from the curse in Genesis 3 vs 16 - 24? No be God's curse them both be?

3. I already explained that God's curse renders imperfect/removed from Holiness under the Law that which it rules over. So, you tell me what part of that you may still have problems with.

Firstly, the woman was not cursed in Gen.3. Please stop prattling as you have been doing to make Jesus imperfect. God deliberately didn't curse her because of her seed. God didn't even curse Adam but the ground for his sake . Why you keep going on and on about a curse on the woman in gen 3 is because you want to twist the scriptures because of your heart. There's no scriptures to provide because a curse on the woman never happened unless you are using a different bible but put on your bible reference of gen3 so I can respond to it.

Secondly, there's no place either in the old testament that shows that God's curse makes things imperfect. Curses are specific stating clearing the effects. Stop stating what the bible never stated as you always do. When curses and blessings were pronounced on the 2 mountains when the Israelites were to cross into the promised land, there effects were announced.

Kobojunkie:
1. So, you equate imperfection to sin aka disobedience?

Remember, cursed is a man who is hung on a tree to die... and guess what, that was another curse that Jesus Christ had to contend with when He was raised on the cross to die. Do you equally believe that curse reduced His status as God too?

2. God's curse is punishment /consequence— not sin— that renders unholy/imperfect that which is judged and condemned. So, to state that a thing is rendered unholy/imperfect by God's curse is to insist that no efforts of man particularly under that same Law by which the judgment was carried out can make man holy and acceptable to God. For example, when God cursed the works of man and man's life on earth in Genesis 3 vs 16- 19, what God did was ensure that all man's efforts and works in his life under that Law, end in nothing — have no meaning i.e. vanity.

3. God cursed all associated with man's living on this earth in Genesis 3 vs 16 - 24 — and because of those curses, man himself existed as though cursed from his birth.

Remember, cursed is the man who is hung on a tree to die... and guess what, that was another curse that Jesus Christ had to contend with when He was raised on the cross to die. Do you equally believe that curse reduced His status as God too?

You stated he was born imperfect which I strongly disagree as this is not the position of the scriptures else he'll be ineligible to die for all mankind.

The curse on a tree is another different topic so let us conclude on this one.

Explain how Jesus the christ was born imperfect maybe,I can understand your view.

Kobojunkie:
So, God did not judge anything pertaining to the woman and man at all in that same context of Genesis 3 vs 14 - 24? I still want to learn about your understanding of what it means to be imperfect/cursed by God.

Imperfection came in when the ate of the fruit. It had nothing to do with child birth. How do you define your imperfection/curse because according to the scriptures, man was not cursed in Gen.3. God cursed the earth for his sake so not to curse him directly. He died/became imperfect when he ate of the fruit.

What is your imperfection.

Kobojunkie:
Let's start by making sure we are on the same page as far as understanding what it means to be born under God's curse — imperfect. Tell me what your understanding is.

First off, God cursed 2 things in Gen.3 1. The serpent, 2. The ground. Now, at what point did God curse women that we are by childbearing become imperfect or to be born, like you claimed under God's curse. Explain this.

Kobojunkie:
It is regarding Him but why do you think it cannot be of Him if God cursed childbearing as stated in Genesis 3 vs 16?

Well, I never thought it was him. You claimed he was imperfect and also agreed that he was God as prophesied by Isa6:9. How then can this be, an imperfect God?

Secondly, since he was imperfect as you said, what then did his death accomplish?

Kobojunkie:
Duh! No one is born perfect from his mother's womb. Rather, Perfection/holiness is attained through the following of God's Law and that is what even Jesus Christ had to do until He was ready for the work that God had for Him at about age 30.

Oh, I see but in isa 9:6 that says God will be born, does that mean that prophecy was not for jesus and we should expect a future fulfillment?

Secondly, what did jesus death achieve since he was imperfect like everyone of us.

Bruxxels:
The claim that Osama bin Laden was "created" by the United States is a simplification and misinterpretation of historical events. It's important to understand the context and nuances of the situation:

Soviet-Afghan War (1979-1989): During this period, the United States, along with other countries, provided support to Afghan mujahideen groups who were fighting against the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. This support was part of the broader Cold War strategy of the U.S. to counter Soviet influence.

Osama bin Laden's Role: Osama bin Laden, a Saudi national, came to Afghanistan to support the Afghan resistance against the Soviets. He was one of many foreign fighters who joined the cause. Bin Laden used his wealth to help finance and support the mujahideen.

U.S. Involvement: The United States, primarily through the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), provided financial support, weapons, and training to the Afghan mujahideen. However, there is no concrete evidence that the CIA directly supported bin Laden or his organization, Al-Qaeda.

Formation of Al-Qaeda: After the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan, bin Laden founded Al-Qaeda, which was not a direct continuation of the mujahideen but a new organization with a broader jihadist agenda, including opposition to the United States.

In summary, while it's true that the U.S. supported Afghan resistance groups against the Soviets, which indirectly created an environment where individuals like Osama bin Laden could gain prominence and experience, it is not accurate to say that the U.S. directly "created" Osama bin Laden or his organization, Al-Qaeda. The historical relationship is more complex and involves various factors and actors beyond U.S. support.










https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.amazon.com/CIA-Al-Qaeda-Osama-Laden-Agent/dp/B086PYTZ7Q&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiosOiousSDAxUcRPEDHXiGCvUQFnoECAYQAg&usg=AOvVaw3Vzn4qzngdV_uFFkd40Xed

Conspiracy theorists will always have something to say as though they're oblivious of the cold war era.

[right][/right]

Ningishzida:
• Uganda passed a law to criminalize Gay. Within the following week, they were attacked by terrorists who somehow managed to acquire western made weapons to carry out their massacres murders in Uganda.

• Western medias are pointing fingers at Iran as being the sponsors of the Houthis, the next thing ISIS carries out a mass massacre in Iran.

This should be an eye opener to any of you Africans still doubting that the West are not the sponsors of these "Islamic Organizations" operating under different names the world over, including the Boko haram and Herdsmen destroying Nigerias economy through the constant massacres they carry out.

The playbook to keep Nigeria and other Countries not belonging to pale-skinned people forever subservient to the West is simple:
Take the case of Nigeria for example.
• Initially it was Boko haram carrying out massacre in a timed schedule. Each of these massacres are constantly hyped by all Western media together. It even got to a point where I had to be checking the local t-online news screens in Germany's city train station to see the breaking news of the most recent massacre carried out by Boko haram and Herdsmen in Nigeria. The goal was to make Foreign investors scared of going to invest in Nigeria. Who wants to invest their money in a country where Islamic jihadists are carrying out mass murders every day?
• Recently the Boko harams are no longer getting enough Western Weapons from their sponsors because these same sponsors have shifted their priorities to sponsoring Herdsmen. The intent of sponsoring the Herdsmen is simple; attack and kill farmers constantly so that at some point in the near future, Farmers will become scarce in Nigeria and people will become scared of farming because everyone knows some farmer(s) that got killed or raped by Herdsmen while working in their farms.
• This trend will lead to us importing all our foods from other countries, meaning more demand of Euro and Dollar, weakening our Naira even further.
• The more our Naira Weakens, the weaker our economy and military will become. This means the few Nigerians left in Nigeria that still has an iota of IQ will all japa to the West in search of greener pastures where majority will end up working as slaves for these Westerners.
It is a grand game that these Westerners are using to keep us poor but unfortunately our leaders lack the self-esteem to stand up to the Western blood suckered.
Instead, ECOWAS, under the leadership of Nigeria, is supporting France to fight against their African Brothers Niger, Mali, Burkina Faso, because these countries finally got leaders who seek dignity for their citizens.
We were once the same Nigeria that assisted South Africa to fight against their Apartheid inflicted upon them by these Pale skinned Westerners. Now we are the same Nigeria helping France to maintain their subjugation of our African brothers.
The image below shows all the affrican countries that supported France to maintain the colonization of Niger, Mali, Burkina Faso through the sanction that prevented any import going to these countries.
One thing stood out, all these countries are francophone colonies with puppet government appointed by France and using currencies produced by France. All the countries except Nigeria. Nigeria had the option but voluntarily chose to support France in their colonization of these three countries whose leaders aare fighting for their right to self-determination.
Thanks to the Moroccan government who finally invited Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger to a talk that will enable them route their imports through the Moroccan ports. It was after Benin Republic heard about this that they decided to quickly reopen their seaports for imports going to these three countries because they know they will be loosing billions annually if these three countries finally signs the deal that will allow them use the Moroccan sea ports for their imports and exports.

Conspiracy theorist, stop trying to twist the narrative on boko haram and herdsmen pls. Your ex-president emboldened both parties when he was insisting RUGA for herdsmen. Your military is cashing out on boko haram. When we are serious to clean the Aegean stable, both boko haram and herdsmen will disappear, afterall, no one knew about them 20 years ago.

Kobojunkie:
You couldn't do anything to save him as a child yet now that he is an adult, you think it your place still to monitor his life and choices? One would expect that by now you would have learned to love him as he is. Is that too much for you to so?

---

In case anyone would come in pretending Scripture on their side in this, make I help una small. In Genesis 3 vs 16, the Almighty who created man ans certified man of good quality, took to washing His hands off the multiplying process --- childbearing--- which was meant to populate the earth with more of the man He had made. Guess what that meant? With God's cursing childbearing, rendering it not of His Kingdom, all who are born into this world are born unrighteous, removed from God. That means no single individual born of a woman is born perfect from the womb.

So, whenever you look at a gay man or a disabled individual, realize that you are just as cursed as he is, only that your damage is just not as obvious as theirs may seem to you.

@ bolded, this means that Jesus was not perfect right?

guobe:
Sometime ago, the 70 years old man broke the internet after posting pictures of the several girls he allegedly slept with.

Of recent, I am now seeing his posts on my Facebook timeline as a motivational speaker.

Where is the motivational speech biko nu or did his stake post motivate you? If yes, in what way.

GabsonFX2:


Paid employment guarantees financial security - a constant source, a reservoir. FX would not pay every week but paid employment does, even when I'm ill - I would still get a constant biweekly pay of EI - Employment Insurance from the government; but, you have to be employed to qualify. Many more reasons why a career outside FX is top-notch.

While bills would never cease, fx biweekly profit would definitely cease at one point or the other; when this happens, what would you do in those weeks or months? frustrated? overleverage? overtrading? martingale? ignore SL? zero psychology? go into debt? depression? etc

I once quit my job (back in 2021) to depend only on fx but I could not stand it cos I'm not the only one in the family - I had to return. However, there is a career level I plan to attain to call it quit. But even at that, I would still go into paid employment but a much more flexible one where I can place my laptop on my workplace table with fx charts all over the place.

Great points. All the best.

nairalanda1:
NYSC could have solved this with biometrics.



If there was a biometric system in place, the reporter would have had no chance. He could change his number and phone several times, it won't work.

Time NNPC instituted a biometric system...like the banks.

The undercover reporter said he carried out biometrics which included fingerprintinh for the offline registration. NYSC has no excuse.

Vl3ly:
Hitler described them wella

That was his view before declaring war on US and we all know how it ended don't we?

Jewessgratitud3:
It could have been a Black attacked.. so?? Just talking generally for the safety of all.

A caucasian could have also done same. Stop stereotyping.