₦airaland Forum

Dtruthspeaker:
You mean you don't know the difference?

It's like you are getting stew.... PDa every year

Let Google teach you
AI Overview
The core difference is that a question saying "what" asks for facts, identities, or descriptions of things, while "why" asks for reasons, causes, or motivations.

Obviously, your new technique of responding to questions which prove you are dom is 2 actually make it worse by actually showing that you are dorm bah. 🤣🤣🤣

Don't mind him. He is now resorted to the gas lighting by feigning ignorance or "playing dumb" to escape the fact that he cannot say anything reasonable after your answer. After all, you have answered him this severally and those times he could never answer. So, now that he cannot answer rather than shamefully go away he chose to disgrace himself by playing willful ignorance.

Roycemadeit:


What did the inhabitants of Jericho do to Israel before Joshua attacked them? What about Ai? Did the Gibeonites attack Israel that they would seek peace?

The Amalekites and Sihon, the Amorite king, fought Israel. But these were distinct peoples and conflicts. Their actions do not establish that every nation Israel conquered attacked Israel first.

You cannot use the actions of one people to justify the destruction of another. Deuteronomy 7:1–2 and 20:16–18 explicitly command the destruction of entire populations.

If you have not read the Bible don't say what proves otherwise... Imagine, the inhabitants of Jericho, Ai, and every other targeted city attacked Israel first.

Like Dtruth has said, you have now changed post to go to "whataboulism". Something which a simple Google check would have answered.

AI Overview
According to the biblical account in the Book of Joshua, the ancient Israelites attacked and destroyed Jericho because it was the first major obstacle the first military engagement on their path because it was a critical military and symbolic gateway into the region.

Same for Ai.

Both of them were border outposts containing very very strong dangerous men that remember 10 Israelites even said that they were "giants" and too strong to challenge.

fattprince:
Not to leave but for Israel to possess the land, and how would that happen without bloodshed if not to leave?

The Bible Said that God Said "He would drive them out of the land". So, blood shed was not the original plan

Amotolongbo:
Medical surgery for the Pope, the “most spiritually powerful” man on earth?

What happens to prayer for miracle to remove the growth in the lung?

Is it everything that requires a miracle?

Plus, is growth in the lung physical?

It's like a disease has eaten you people's brahnes

Roycemadeit:
If the Canaanites, Amorites, Jebusites, Hivites and Hittites were already inhabiting their respective territories, what exactly are you talking about when you say nations fought to claim land?

[Were these people fighting one another over territory, or were the Israelites coming to take land that others already occupied?

Abraham was promised Canaan by Yahweh, but the people living there were never part of that agreement. They weren't consulted, and the Bible doesn't record Yahweh informing them that their land had been promised to Abraham's descendants. How did Abraham's private covenant become a legitimate claim against people who knew nothing about it?

Imagine I tell you that Kaoru has promised me your house. Would that suddenly make your house mine? Would you be a terrorist for refusing to surrender it? If not, why should the same principle change simply because the story is in the Bible?

^{Bear in that you don't even know what or who Kaoru is}

The issue isn't whether ancient people fought wars. It's whether winning wars, or claiming divine permission, makes taking another people's land morally justified.

You cannot condemn one group for doing something [terrorists] while excusing another group for the same thing simply because your scripture approves of one and condemns the other.

This is precisely why I keep referring you people to the actual biblical narrative. Genesis 23 shows Abraham purchasing a burial plot from Ephron the Hittite. Joshua describes the conquest of territories already inhabited by other peoples. These details matter. You cannot selectively read the Bible, ignore the uncomfortable parts, and then claim you've answered an argument you haven't even understood.

Terrorists all over the world are condemned because they left their homes and went murder people in their own land.

The very same thing which the Canaanites, Amorites, etc did.

And this settlements were even big and large established people, meanwhile, Isreal were displaced migrants who were attacked by these great people exactly like if china goes attacking Eritrean and Ethiopian migrants during the Eritrean/Ethiopian war.
This is automatic war crime for to attack migrants is a great evil worthy of annihilation.

So, the Israelite migrants never attacked them Canaan as they were still in the desert so it was them Canaan who made themselves guilty of war crimes and God used it to wipe them out, exactly how US bombed japan nearly to extinction because Japan made the mistake of drawing the first blood.

And no one condemned the US, if anything Japan apologized. So, this is very much justified and you are talking nonsense.

fattprince:
I really don't want to insult you guys, but I really want to call you guys I don't know. So by surrendering you mean, they are supposed to just leave their land and move to other places because your God commanded it. So why are you blaming the Muslim extremist has the op pointed out before? Because they believe killing people who don't want to be Muslims is what their God which they believe is the true God and creator of all told them to do, which means they are fair in their killing.

Where did you see God command them to leave?

Did they leave their land and move out to other places? No.

Is it not even that they got wiped out because they attacked small Isreal first, even when Isreal where far away in the desert?

It is even them who behaved like Muslims terrorists

Many are mad and browsing

Dtruthspeaker:
Now it has also come out that some mothers sleep with their sons.

https://www.nairaland.com/8750035/florida-mom-sex-son-100

Any evil remain wey women no fit do?

The evil a woman cannot do does not exist!

Goo0dHardDick:
Adam didn't feel any space dude. He didn't even know what woman was!

It was God himself that immediately concluded within himself that Adam was lonely and needed a look like.

Adam was never bothered at all. He was completely okay on his own. How can Adam need space for something he has never seen before? A creature he has never ever seen nor imagine? How una dey reason sef

Aah aah, now! Did the Bible not clearly say Adam did not find a help meet for him meaning he was looking for someone or something and that he was no longer fine.

Even his reaction to woman when he first saw her shows you that truth.

So your blaming God that He concluded within Himself is very unfair.

The truth is man is first fine until he isn't and that is when he looks for the woman.

Jameslara1:
Oloshi jesus is dead asf. Wrap this up twin.

See as life don finish dis one. Tinubu, press on

Sleekfingers:
😏😏😏😏😏😏😏Your God is so wicked that he couldn't forgive Adam and Eve.
Your God is so wicked that , he chose to sacrifice is so called soon Jesus like Christmas chicken.
After all this years . Allowing people to die , including babies, children.

O Lord, i know all who are evil, get their evil in due time. But let the life of this man be misry ful all the days of his life everyday. That his yesterday's are always better than his today forever and ever. Let him never have any good thing for the rest of his life. In Jesus Name. Amen

Samantha125:
That's just your self importance and ego speaking, not every woman wants to get married.

It's already proven that women want to marry so no need to tell lies

Fiscus105:
You are type of foolxish men, you are describing above.

Again, I insist, if you are extending goodness to whoever and he/she refuses to resprocating, you use your common sense to stop it and not indoctrination from your fellow man

You think you are the first? It would still happen again

paxonel:
To respond to that fellow up there, and for the benefit of others listening, not for his benefit
He quoted without understanding it
kingdom of God.

Then he ignored the part that says

1 Corinthians 6:11 And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.[/b]

Meaning, before Paul converted these people into Christianity, before God (because it is God that judges, not humans) they were fornicators,idolaters, adulterers, effeminate, abusers of themselves with mankind.
But after Paul had preached to them and they accepted Christ (ie accept to join Christianity) from that moment, they siezed to be these things before God. That's why "Paul said such were some of you"[/b] using the past tense WERE

Meaning, even though they might be commiting these sins God is not counting the sins anymore.

Another scripture says Abraham believed God it was counted to him for righteousness.

Yet Abraham was also a terrible sinner like every other human

Apparently, you are intolerant of opposition, clearly it means you know that you are wrong but you don't want anybody to tell you so.

Meanwhile, the it is written "were" which you explained that they stopped and ceased ("siezed to be these things".)

Meaning that in the absence of these things they ceased, it is presumed they only lived doing the Righteous things. So, you have only confirmed and reaffirmed what the person said

And so, how can you say even though they might be committing these sins God is not counting the sins anymore, when even Jesus in Revelations shows that He is counting sins in saying

"Nevertheless I have somewhat against thee",.. and ended "else I will come unto thee quickly, and will remove thy candlestick out of his place, except thou repent/Behold, I will cast her into a bed, and them that commit adultery with her into great tribulation, except they repent of their deeds."

Clear proof that God is counting and recording.

And truly we can all count Abraham's sins but who can count your sins and other peoples' own? Abraham over over gap us, so no talk it

True true don't deceive yourself. If you must deceive yourself then don't increase your sins by deceiving others like Sayt did to Eve

ReluctantAdult:
I understand her.

There's this dopamine and adrenaline rush you get when you cheat on your partner and never get caught Or whenever you fcc someone's partner and they don't find out
It's like treading a very fine line and I tell you, the orgasm is second to none!


Be warned though, it's so addictive and you can overdo it and get caught. So be careful

Urghh! See how you have fallen for her deceit. Anyway, go and marry her.

Samantha125:
Why would they need marriage when they're already being well taken cared of by other women's husbands?

Their wailing cries and all the threads of antics tells us that they still want to marry even desperately after all

Reverse psychology of hiding in plain sight. Brestina, no one will still marry you

Tenrack:
I'm not a pro, my ex was a single mother that bleeped me up. I know how much I lost. But I'll be damned if the same ever happens to me again. That's what I'm saying. How you managed to let 8 girls play you is beyond mey understanding

It is because of that lie "not all women are bad" which men unfortunately refuse to believe in their mind of being fair when already the women have shown that the game is not fair.

MarketDispatch:
Interesting...no money no love ..Elders have said it. It is money you use to become Husband of woman

Yet, the rich too are crying here

pigmania:
I pray make him survive am reach number 20.

The guy don survive 8 so maybe hin get caterpillar engine

Samantha125:
But they'll still be financially benefitting more from those men as side chicks than as wives... Most men spend more on their side chicks than wives, sad reality.

True! There are still too many foo...sh men so, she lives dreams but no marriage

247man:
Unfortunately you can never understand women

Unfortunately, you can but the problem is that men don't think it is that important. Thinking making money is greater than studying women. And so they lazily deal with women based on the common sayings of others hence all the mistakes and bad experience they get

bukatyne:
The problem is that you men classify women in your head into good & bad aka fit for a wife and fit for a good time. You don't believe that a woman can love praying and sex; a girl who is serious with her studies can also love phone intimacy; a mother who loves her children can also give a mean BJ.

And because of that classification in your head, you only show the side that will bring out the side of her you 'approve' of.

The men who enjoy their women are those who understand that their women are whole, rounded human beings who love different things.

The men who can pray with their wives and do BJ on 3rd mainland; the ones who can get their bubu wearing wives a quickie on their neighbours' staircase; the men who understand that their akpu pounding wives don't mind a spank and doggy style.

On the other hand, a woman wants a rounded man. A woman can want a kind, responsible, reliable, tongue speaking man who gives a great head, can bring flowers and a great tease.

A good visual example is the good male leads in an Asian short drama. A man can a CEO, attentive to his wife, treat her like egg and still make love to her on the highway or his office table because he misses her.

I have heard men say a good 'wife' does not do BJ because she uses the same mouth to kiss her kids.

All these are movie lies. Women should be categorised into good and bad but unfortunately for most men they don't know what is good or bad even though they think they do.

2special:
If you understand women, you won't Love them, and if you Love them, you won't understand them.

Correct!

But many men have already given their strings to women and some even say that it should be so

I even think that many crying now and giving advice where those who once hollad not "all women are bad"

Fiscus105:
Not until you people know that kindness is different from foolishness, you will keep talking thrash about man to woman relationship, common sense needs to tell you if you are extending hands of kindness to particular person over time and instead to resprocating, she is be ungrateful, you need to cut it immediately

Do you not how men have been over extending kindness to a woman yet, they did not know? The fact that you learnt to beat the system today does not mean that you won't fall tomorrow.

pocohantas:
Because women no appreciate "kindness", make person come dey wicked? Some of una no too get sense.

Person wey no appreciate kindness na wicked person and he deserve Wike.ness,Tinubuness and Buhariness

AngelSlay:
I think this presents a false dilemma. Men are not limited to being either the "bad boy" or the "nice guy." Most healthy, well-adjusted men fall somewhere in the middle. They are confident without being arrogant, kind without being pushovers, and assertive without being toxic....

And they still lost and were still kicked out too, so your theory still does not work

Goodmarlian:
When it comes to women nobody wins not the bad boy not the good boy,if she is dating a nonchalant boy she will cheat with a good guy that treats her like a queen ,if she is dating a good guy she will cheat with a bad boy that treats her non challantly she belongs to nobody

Tell them

All these because men haven't still learnt who their enemy is

Samantha125:
Many modern women are already desisting from marriage, so I'm sure they wouldn't mind being side chicks as long as they can keep milking the men's finances dry.

It is still them wailing and humiliating themselves because they are not married

Tomcorp:
Goodluck to them. They will be side chics for life.

Only because now men are beginning to look. In the past they won it all doing all these things and if not for the economy they would still have kept winning

Tomcorp:
As a single lady once you love flashy, extravagant, flamboyant, expensive lifestyle too much- no man will take you serious. Men will just use & continue to dump you- at best they will keep you as a side chic. This is the bitter truth modern ladies don't want to hear. What a man wants in a girlfriend is completely different from what he wants in a wife. I'm talking of MEN not boys. Men love simple, modest, conservative ladies. Let those with ears...hear.

Who told you they care? Are they not already winning? You are still trying to bend women to suit you. You go learn