₦airaland Forum

4KNGOATS:
Gay Modafukkaa

I'm pretty sure "gay" connotes sexual attraction not gender norms, know the difference

Effizybozz:
Lmao, I’m not that feminine, just a little bit. The way I talk maybe, you know when someone say why you Dey do like woman… that always send chill down my spine, I hate hearing it

Have you ever asked yourself why do you feel that chill when someone says the bolded?

MrBrownJay1:
you shouldnt really care how you feel around guys, but instead focus on being the best you can around WOMEN.



https://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/charlie-murphy.gif

What's the funny gif for? Everyone literally have both masculine and feminine energies within them,nobody is a 100% masculine or 100% feminine

Image123:
i said that i can't claim to be a student by mere claims(just like a person can't claim to be a Christian or Buddhist by mere claims). You replied with "Exactly,you can't claim because you are not them."

It's an anonymous forum, anyone can say what they aren't

Image123:
So you think that you have the right to point out that i am not a student?

Where on earth did I say that?

Maynman:
They boast of their religion population when it favours them, whej it doesn’t favour them, start to critically define what “religion” and religious people mean.
Nice 👌

When a secular artist sings about God or participates in religious activities, it can be seen as a engagement with religious themes or practices. However, during times of scandals or controversies, people question or dismiss the person’s religion identity. Inconsistent hypocrites!

Are you seeing it too? Who the hell are these people to even say someone is religious or not as if they follow the entire tenets of their own religion

Image123:
They are not on the journey yet. i can't claim to be a student by mere claims. No registration, no school fees/tuition, no uniforms or admission. Just strolling into the school every once in a while.

Exactly,you can't claim because you are not them,are you trying to absolve them of their religion because you think you have the right to point out who's religious or not......No,you don't

Image123:
Religion does not mean you are religious, it can just be nominal. Most so called atheists here are professing christians. Where they are asked of their religion, most will claim to be christian. Everybody is a christian or muslim in most places in Africa and Asia. It's in the the closet that most(not all) have no religion. The average drunkard, yahoo thief, cultist, and ritual killer will claim a religion and blame the devil for their misdeeds when caught. They are not religious. Some of them don't even go to church, mosque or temple except on special occasion or for social reasons. You cannot sincerely and objective call these religious, especially in line with the argument/discussion/conversation.
Religious people are those people always going to church/mosque/temple etc. They are dedicated, they probably work there and have some sort of commitment. i am not holding brief for religious people BTW(We actually preach against them). But the point is that they are different from the mass of unserious people that they are lumped together with.

Great way to absolve someone of their religious journey

Image123:
Apart from scriptures, from dictionary,



religious

religious
1 of 2
adjective
re·​li·​gious ri-ˈli-jəs
Synonyms of religious
1
: relating to or manifesting faithful devotion to an acknowledged ultimate reality or deity
a religious person
religious attitudes
2
: of, relating to, or devoted to religious beliefs or observances
joined a religious order
3
a
: scrupulously and conscientiously faithful
b
: FERVENT, ZEALOUS

So where is your truth standing on? Most people claim one religion or the other and most blame the devil for their wrongs. That doesn't mean that they are religious. Religious people are very zealous from my own experience too.

Dude if someone says they are a Christian even if they don't go to church ,they are a Christian, that's their faith,they may not to adhere to all the tenets of that religion but their subjective morality is already a telltale. My truth is mine based on my experiences not yours or anyone else's,mine and mine alone. The bolded is your truth,I can never debate that with you

Image123:
Religious people are people who are scrupulous, manifesting faithful devotion to an acknowledged ultimate reality or deity. That's why i mentioned pastors. Not everyone that claims to have a religion is religious. For example, in the new testament, we had many Jews but they were not all religious like say the Scribes or Pharisees or even disciples of Jesus. There were publicans, prostitutes and possessed people there. There were the nominal average Jew there. These people were not considered religious, nonetheless they were not atheists.
So again, there's no conversation until you bring in relevant and complete data and facts.

If you adhere to any religion even if you are carnal in the faith,you are religious and I did say there are no statistics to prove it but going by my experience, it's a truth and it's my truth

Image123:
And you magically connect this with religious people?

Well, looking at the American political sphere,the black church and the Catholic church...... it's hard not to see the correlation even if the statistics aren't available

Image123:
The conversation has no known language and no verifiable or reasonable logic. Lolz

It's just common logic as heterosexual people are the majority

LordReed:
Also most of the pedophiles caught have been religious people.

They are not ready for this conversation

Almiron:
i can't hate em both, na dia gayism dey start, i love women

The same way some women love men and love seeing two or other men get it on,they love gay porn so much that there's are particular types of gay porn made and marketed for them called yaoi,bara and BL......the love men yet you don't see them being the hypocrite saying they love gay porn but hate lesbian porn

OLAADEGBU:
Yes, Gay Activists are After Your Children.

Like straight people haven't been indoctrinating kids since time immemorial

OLAADEGBU:
A.F. Branco Cartoon – Frontal Assault
A.F. BRANCO on June 29, 2023 at 10:12 am

Pride Exposed
https://comicallyincorrect.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/08-pride-ok-ci-1080-1050x750.jpg
Pride Exposed. Pride Marches are exposing adult nudity to children, and it's legal? Cartoon by A.F. Branco ©2023.

Blame the parent,pride has always been a sex positive event,kids don't belong there but political correct parents mostly straight allies of the LGBTQ+ community bring their kids there by making us look bad

budaatum:
Any one notice that most paedophiles who are after children happen to be heterosexuals?

They will always deny this fact

Purvan:
Dudes in prison become gay because imagine not having sex with any women for months or even years. that would make anyone gay

The main reason men starts having sex with other men in prison is because environment influences sexuality

YoungLionken:
Good move ..

We are Africans! We got a culture to protect, for posterity's sake. Whoever does not conform, can relocate to the west, where they accept and celebrate moral depravity...

What culture? A culture that's been whitewashed?

MS247:




Jail him

We have laws against western homosexuality

HIV started from United States homosexuals


.

Homosexuality isn't a western concept

Almiron:
Make dem jail am or send him to Uganda for better mending. Gay or whatever na mental disorder. Women v Women still dey sweet to watch, i don't understand how a man go allow a fellow man insert his gbola in his butthole.

Wetin concern Mendy e no dey the WhatsApp group, he don lash over 10k women, be like Mendy d**k is meant for p**, don't rape like Mendy sha o, allegedly or allegba.

Stop being a hypocrite,women v women is hot because it turns you on,if you hate them, hate them both

Gamesmart:
Definitely!

I am like most black people. I don't support the queer movement.

Fair enough

Gamesmart:
Wrong!

I fight for black people (not the race-baiters and victim-chasers), women's rights (not the selfish ones), children's rights (but with reasonable chastisement), asylum seekers (not illegal migrants), religious rights (as long as they are not going to impose it on me or the laws), disability rights and men's rights!

Any other conjectures you want to try as mud sling?

Like I said no black queer rights in the mix,like the late Whitney Houston said "it's not right but it's ok"

KingDash09:
Come my area and see smallies with short short gowns


Any girl dressing indecently should be flogged
We must cast out the spirit of ashawo

Also tell guys not to expose their chest and not to be shirtless or sag, those are indecent dressing

Gamesmart:
You keep on proving me right.

When these LGBT movement have no logic and they can't accept a fact, they turn to labeling and outrage.

The Degenerates are your kin. Don't leave them.

The "degenerates" are my kin and I'm gonna fight for them even if their struggles are different unlike you who only fights for black people who you think only matter

Gamesmart:
I speak for majority of the black community.

Don't play that nonsense game of "some" or "raise doubt" with me.

Typical tactic of the Liberal and Feminist crew: Adamant refusal of facts.

Fact: Majority of black people abhor LGBT and are not interested in their rights.

I speak for them! I speak FACT!

You are no different! You reject truth and facts that does not please you.

Just like degenerates too, who are biological deniers. Biological facts will be rejected. A shitshame movement who just want to force their nonsense on people without facts.

Well you speak for the bigots, that's for sure and thank goodness that's gradually changing

Gamesmart:
I am not doing oppresions olympics.

I am just highlighting hypocrisy, fraud and the consequences/outcomes of imposing wrong without winning an argument with logic and facts.

Cut this crap of range of folks make up the black community

Applying your own logic:

Range of folks make up the degenerates community too. So LGB should stick with them and stand behind them.

Some LGB support them, so #NoLGBwithouttheTQA+Degenerates.

I specifically said I don't speak for the community the same way you don't speak for the black community but ok

Gamesmart:
Don't separate them.

That is just creating intersectionality.

That is waste of effort by duplication.

That is hypocrisy.

Ride and die with the TQADegenerates.



As I told you, Black people give a shit what type of prejudice you are associating and grouping them with, and are pissed & feel violated when associated and grouped with LGBT. They will rather fight their fight, struggles and prejudice alone, and not ally with LGBT. But LGBT still try to leech to stick with Blacks.

Suffragettes did not need Blacks, Ameridians or whatever in their arguments of freedom and acceptance. Even being associated with these would have been detrimental to their movement.

Neither did Blacks tie their movement to suffragettes. They fought as a standalone and won the argument.

So, other movements in America have fought for their struggles and prejudice alone. The first to engage in the scam of association to gain credibility was the LGBT movement. They did not win the argument, they just manipulated and shamed the people. Basically, they created the smear that "if you hate and do that accept us, then you are just racist, sexist and homophobic". It was a sinister and planned tactic.

What is it with you and oppression olympics? Again,you do realize that a range of folks make up the black community right? With each having their subjective fights,you don't speak for all black people neither do I even publications and essays that you and I might cite to support our argument are personal opinions of the writer, it's also the same way I don't speak for all queer people,infact majority of the community don't want the split so you saying black people don't give a shit when you are talking mostly about you and your fellow bigots would have made sense back in the day but certainly not today

You are saying both are different struggles and shouldn't be merged,I agree but in today's political correct climate,social justice warriors or as you lot like to call them "woke people" of this generation with whom majority of today's black activist are part of are literally fighting against all forms of prejudice so do you expect a black straight person who have a black gay sibling not to wave the pride flag to support them at pride? Go over to YouTube,you will rarely see someone black talking about black history not also talk about queer history of inputting queer theory in their videos. The black community of old was super homophobic now they are realizing that homophobia was a complete western concept especially with my generation even black lives matter were founded by black lesbians,do you in any way not think that there will be intersectionality especially with them dealing with both racism and homophobia? You keep trying to dismiss black queer people because to you black lives only matter when they are cis and straight,why do you think people were fight for all black lives instead of just black lives without the all during the wake of the George Floyd protest? It was because of folks like you

I never said suffragettes needed black,I was drawing a comparison about the leeching the same way you keep trying to do, comparison isn't leeching, that's where you are getting this argument all wrong

Gamesmart:
It is obvious you are struggling with comprehending my point.

My point is that is is hypocritical of LGBT brigade to utilise to their benefit unlinked fights and struggles when it favoured them, but now try to highlight how it is wrong for unlinked fights and struggles to be fought together, when it is not favouring them.

It is as foolish as a woman who years ago was sleeping with her best friend's fiance, and then snatches him from her and married him, now saying her current best-friend who is sleeping with her husband now is just a disgraceful and unprincipled person.

You would have shown more principles and logic if you had said "Yes, we are hypocrites and did exploit racism to fight our fight, but we honestly cannot let these mad degenerates of the TQA+ spoil our market. We don't want to be associated with them anymore as it is not benefitting us". Simples!

But you will not say that because you are as selfish and shady as the whole LGBT movement itself.



Will you cut the foolish, typical leftist crap of labeling people some -ist or -phobic because they merely stated the facts.

You people can never win an argument with logic and facts, you just prefer labeling and outrage.

By me stating a fact is misoygny? What moronic foolishness.

If I say women are less strong than men ............................MISORGNY!!!

Your brains are allergic to the truth. That is why you deserve to be with the degenerates who think by saying they are women, then they are women even though they have diicks and beards.



Don't be stuuupid!

We chase women for sex because we are programmed biologically to need them.

Beyond sex, women have little net value to us, especially the men at the top that women all want.

They are not great friends, don't give good advice and are selfish.

Most men prefer male company and friendship than female. The just prefer women for sex.

If one is a top man with a brain, friendship with an average woman he is not having sex with and is not going to link him up with women he can have sex with, is usually valueless and a waste of time.

Women are less able and productive than men on average; and they are built to benefit from men.

FACTS ARE FACTS!

First and foremost,just because our struggles and fights are different and we are trying to separate them doesn't mean we are not going to fight for them. A black transwoman and a latina transwoman are the reasons we have any rights at all, we are making a distinction between both as they are different in every way,like I told you,I don't care about the type of prejudice as long as it's prejudice,I'm there to fight such powers of oppression and this your obsession with always inserting racism into the discourse because of your notion of how the queer community latches on to it,you are saying it like it's the first movement that took place in America when the suffrage and women's rights came before it,so are you gonna say the black community also latched on to that to soothe their narrative? All i'm trying to say is that it doesn't matter who came first,the world was evolving and people were tired of living under a society that did them more harm than good to them, that's how movements are made,it doesn't matter which

Ah.....and again with the casual misogyny,I'm not even going to delve into that because your whole persona just screams me me me

Ajay7411:
Why do you keep avoiding my questions? Are you this daft??

I'm sorry sir and no I'm not daft....... it's just that I can't take your threat seriously when there's no threat at all

Gamesmart:
Trolling is when one uses your own logic on you?

This is the problem with the LGBT brigade and why they never win arguments. Because they are a very effeminate movement, they lack logic and only argue with their feelings like women typically do. They don't do facts, data, logic and objectivity; and can only see issues from their own prism of interest. They are only interested in points that suit their agenda/goals and will get emotional if you don't support or agree with their selective application of logic.

I highlighted how "skin colour" and "sexuality" are different and it was an abuse and devious for the LGBT brigade to use it for their interest. You told me I was being intersectional, that fight and struggles are same thing.

Same you now want to highlight that "sexuality" and "gender expression" are different and that the fight and struggles are different and should not be fought together. But you are not being intersectional?

This is why I don't argue with women. I either tell them what to do or tell them to shut up!

Wait.....what on earth am I looking at? In 2023?
I literally validated your argument when you brought in skin color to the mix even if that's not what the thread is about by telling you race and sexuality are different but you kept on going on about oppression olympics ,ok.....I decided to bite by bringing in intersectionality,that black and gay people exist but you kept on bringing up race even if it had nothing to do with the Convo because you only care about the "black race" as long as they only remain straight and only men are in charge right?

I never discarded the gender movement,just pointed out how different we are and that's basically on the scope of the thread whereas you brought up racial and sexuality comparison to score cheap points when it literally had nothing to do with anything on this thread

Also,buddy slow down on the misogyny and you basically just proved my point that homophobia stems from misogyny and it's pretty dumb how you straight men hate feminity with passion when everyone have both masculine and feminine energies in them both socially and biologically but you lot have basically associated it with weakness by just looking at it just from the physical lens,I will say it and keep on saying it,the only reason why you straight men love feminity in women is because it turns you on,if it didn't,I'm definitely sure the patriarchy would've discarded them a long time ago........there've been a culture shift in the last couple of years and it's obviously affecting you,you practically think it's your right to ostracize anyone that's different from what you are used to but that's one thing about power,it sure has a limit

Ajay7411:
Where you see 2 gay men flaunting their love in Nigeria??

Be like e don tey since you leave Nigeria (if you really commot as you talk)

And I'm telling you that TIERS are loophole in the bill,is it until they find it that you will act? By then it will be too late,I keep seeing more talking and no acting,do something rather than becoming a keyboard warrior or you can just say you don't have the guts to do shit because gay marriage isn't even legal in Nigeria so I don't know why you were getting your pants twisted