₦airaland Forum

omoredia:
A nation built on the very premise of corruption and injustice can never see the light of day. Nigeria is not what Nigerians agreed to

Is America what Americans were promised?

omoredia:
Nigeria must die for Nigerians to live. Nigeria was never a Nigerian idea.

I'll clip this.

Eriokanmi:
Trump had waited long enough on reciprocity and the necessary adjustments with corrections expected from our government. Things like immigration and security challenges were never addressed too. See daoly killings, kidnapping and massive money laundering under this apc government...how can someone said he paid 5m usd as schl fees of 4 of his children in a college in Switzerland? We all knew he laundered that money ni. Not even in the college situated in the space would such an amount be paid in fees.

I think we deserve this. This inept government and their blind followers need to be taught a lesson

Trump loves corruption.

Say another thing.

omoredia:
Trump just needs to take our Dangote refinery and e don finish

If he burns it down you would celebrate it.

Why no clothes?

Left them in the UFO?

After damaging the American Economy.

MaziObinnaokija:
Thank God, Flangelo12 don travelled to Morocco

Otherwise I for rain curses.
🤬

Great man.

Enjoy your retirement.

✌️

yinkus6750:
While the recall isn't abnormal, cos they might want to post another stronger Ambassador.
However, the relationship between both countries isn't really any better in recent times.
The FG needs to open and follow up diplomatically on this sensitive issues, that really bother on mutual relationship between both countries

Why?

Today, Trump has made another claim to Greenland, once again.

He's an irrational being .

Free them.

Most members of Congress, Trump's cabinet, including Trump himself are involved in market manipulation and insider trading.

It is not a crime this period.

Na Only Ameican-based Nigerians dey attend Detty December?

One day e go yellow like Flavour Nabania




Come oh, where's Bobrisky sef?

RillJ:
Will do when the price comes back to, or lower than he met it.

Is your salary lower than when he came in?

Wetin dem dey take the children do?

Just marry the 2.

Easy peasy.

stuffs2002:
OBIDIENTS will rather die than praise Tinubu

Imagine a christmas in which fuel is cheaper than yesterday.

You all should praise Tinubu.

Abi e dey hard una mouth?

SpaceX:
Tinubu looted project, I can bet my balls this project will never be completed.

Na AI be that picture, abi?

No source.

No picture.

No specifoc location.

Lagos-Ibadan is very long.

If the Biden administration had released the Epstein files while Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal was still ongoing, it could have potentially jeopardized the government's case against her by providing grounds for her lawyers to argue that she could not receive a fair trial or retrial due to prejudice from public attention and the release of unproven allegations.

Here's a breakdown of the likely outcomes and context:

Grounds for Appeal/Retrial: Maxwell's legal team could have used the public release of extensive, potentially sensitive, and unadjudicated information to claim that the resulting media frenzy and public opinion would make a fair hearing impossible, thus violating her right to due process. Her lawyers made this exact argument in December 2025, claiming the release of "grand jury materials from her case, which contain untested and unproven allegations" would "foreclose the possibility of a fair retrial".

Ongoing Investigation Exemption: U.S. federal authorities typically cite an "ongoing investigation" exemption to withhold materials from public view to protect the integrity of the case. This was a key reason why the files were not fully released during the Biden administration (which ended in January 2025), as the case against Maxwell was actively being pursued through conviction and appeals.

DOJ Discretion: The Department of Justice has historically been very selective about which materials it releases to protect individuals' privacy and ongoing investigations. A premature, mass release by the executive branch could be seen as an interference with the judicial process, which could have been challenged in court.

Actual Timeline: It is important to note that the bulk of the "Epstein files" (specifically those mandated by the new Epstein Transparency Act) were ultimately released by the Trump administration's Justice Department in December 2025, after the Supreme Court had already rejected Maxwell's primary appeal in October 2025. Maxwell has since filed a new, separate petition to a district court to vacate her sentence, and her lawyers raised concerns about the timing of the release impacting that new effort.
In essence, releasing the files during an active, direct appeal would have provided Maxwell's defense with powerful arguments that the government's actions prejudiced her case, potentially leading to a new trial or even a dismissal of charges under rare circumstances. The Justice Department under Biden (and later Trump, before the new law) cited the ongoing legal proceedings and investigations as reasons to limit the release of certain materials.

tctrills:
Oga send links not snapshot.

And of course you have nothing to teach. I am such you are making your research right now and you see it doesn't favor you so you don't want to share

Won't send you squat.

You're old enough to do your own research.

tctrills:
Are you creating new laws for the US?
There is no law to support what you said

I would not teach you.

You can at least do some research.
.I have spent time and time providing links for everything.

You can at least learn this one without being spoonfed.

tctrills:
No she would not have been free under any law. And you have never redacted a criminal doc so don't say what you don't know.

It would be subjudice.

The State's case would be tossed.

tctrills:
Funny exuse,

But lets summarize
These are xour evidence against Trump
1. A video from a woman who the courts proved to be a fake
2. The account if a DOJ staff who claimed his brain was corrupted by Trump hating media.
So basically, Trump hating media.
3. Because Trump talked about grabbing a woman by the puss
Did we miss anything?

If these are what it takes to convict a man then we are in trouble

The court never said it was fake.
If you have evidence the court used such words produce it .

But you're a liar so you won't.

Schnitt said what was going to happen and it did.

He never knew he was being recorded and he got fired for what he said in private.

Trump is wapist amongst several crimes.

I give it 1 year.

Someone would release it all unredacted.

tctrills:
Because in any civilized society we must protect victims.
Thats the only reason why the files are redacted. Don't forget that Biden released nothing, redacted or not

If Biden had releases the Epstein files, Ghislaine would have been freed.

Her case was still before the courts.

Redacting names does not take an entire page.

One word, maybe one line .

Not several pages following each other.

tctrills:
Oga, Esptein was already dead. You mean there was a case against his dead body?

Again, Esptein was already frond guilty of sex offenses. No one was building a case against Him

Are we still on this?

Ghislaine Maxwell was appealing her judgement all the way to the supreme court.

In October the supreme court flung her case out .

After that, a law was made to make the DOJ release the files.

tctrills:
Oga did you make the claim or not that the DOJ guy said they were instructed to scrub the files?

Did he ever make such claims? Are you dishonest or what.

And stop sending dishonest snapshots, send us links so we can read the entire article not just dishonest headlines. We went to school and we have time to read

He said the files would be scrubbed of all GOP and would have the Democrats left in.

I don't even know why you don't want Trump to release the unredacted files.

tctrills:
Lol,
The Biden administration had 4 years and they brought up all they had against Trump. It seems you mr random on Nairaland knows more than they do.

Remember, the file was available to the Biden doj

We won't go over this.

The case was before the law courts.

Now there is a law that states all the files must be released.

tctrills:
You are now denying your words. No one said you said Trump told him personally. But you clsimed he said that they were instructed by Trump to scrub the files which is a lied.

And yes he should be fired. And any respectable court cannot admit anything such a man says about this case as evidence.

Yes, they were.

Not him personally, of course.

But he was aware.

I even provided a link.

tctrills:
What are you saying? The girl had her day in court. We can only see that she was a fake.

Again we see that the email cant even be used as evidence because Trump has an alibi and witnesses.

In any court , your case is at best rubbish

What is Trump hiding?

tctrills:
A top FBI manager was caught in a sting operation sometime this year, claiming Trump had instructed them to scrub the files of any mention of his name, and leave in any Democrats.


Schmitt never claimed that Trump told him or anyone he knew to do anything

Rather he said that he suspected that the DOJ would "redact every Republican or conservative person in those files.

Schnitt later clarified that his remarks were based on media reports and personal speculation, not official DOJ knowledge.

Its one thing for you to claim that the guy was instructed to scrub files and another for the guy to say this was his suspicion and he was getting his news for media not anything happening 8n the doj

The guy was fired for his statement.

He never knew he was being recorded and it made easier to be candid.

I never said Trump told him personally.

In any case, he's spot on.

Time has proven his statement to be true.