You spend all your fortune building mansions that your grandchildren will not want to live in because it will become old fashioned.
We have seen many of those kind of houses everywhere lying fallow and dilapidated
I wish men will learn how to focus on what need to be focused on, which is knowing when to stop hussling for properties and start taking care of themselves so they can live longer
There's nothing like old fashioned house.
Lots of homes in UK and US are hundreds of years old.
tctrills: So listen to yourself, You are claiming that not one of the Esptein victims was brave enough to accuse Trump even when he was no more in power and the Biden administration was all out to get him. Make that make sense. Again, you want us to believe that even though no victim has accused Trump of any wrong doing, he is guilty because you said so and because it talked about grabbing puss.
I am sure some time in me stupidity, i have made such an ill judged statement, dies that make me a sex offender ?
We clearly see there was at least 1 girl who accused Trump.
Her testimony aligned with that of the Epstein girls.
The Epstein files is also heavily redacted, so a lot of the perpetrators are being masked.
To make matters worse, a DOJ official had said 3 months before that this would happen.
Trump and Epstein were very close.
Trump is an adjudicated wapist.
Epstein's email correspondence with Ghislaine tells us that Trump was in Epstein's house for hours with one of the victims.
That email was released outside of the purview of the Department of Justice, as it was part of the Epstein Estate.
tctrills: Oha she lost jer case simple and short. If she continued after losing her case to accuse Trump, it would have legal implications simple. And i am surprised you need to be taught why cases like this come with so much redaction
How many of you are brave enough to accuse ordinary Wike to his face?
You think a lady would not fear for her life when threatened?
Now just this year in a cnn Town Hall, Espteins victims where asked directly about Trump's involvement and none had anything against him. So do we believe the victims or your katie that was never a victim but a crookas oriven by her failed case
tctrills: How many times do you want me to watch the video? Trump might be anything but in this case, the law says the woman had zero evidence. She doesn't even have evidence of being an Esptein victim. Should we believe you and this evil woman or accept the court of law?
You are trying to force me to accept what the law has thrown out
She did not show up any further.
This was before there was an Epstein file issue.
If Trump is innocent, he can do the world a favour and provide unredacted copies of files.
tctrills: What are you saying, none of the real Esptein girls accuse Trump but you choise one who already had her day in court and failed?
Are you saying that we should believe everyone that accuses Trump even without evidence and when the courts have proved that they are fake?
Now back to your lies
You wrote this
A top FBI manager was caught in a sting operation sometime this year, claiming Trump had instructed them to scrub the files of any mention of his name, and leave in any Democrats.
The guy never claimed that Trump instructed him or anyone to scrub anything from the files.
tctrills: What are you saying, none of the real Esptein girls accuse Trump but you choise one who already had her day in court and failed?
Are you saying that we should believe everyone that accuses Trump even without evidence and when the courts have proved that they are fake?
Now back to your lies
You wrote this
A top FBI manager was caught in a sting operation sometime this year, claiming Trump had instructed them to scrub the files of any mention of his name, and leave in any Democrats.
The guy never claimed that Trump instructed him or anyone to scrub anything from the files.
Why did you feel the need to tell this lie?
If none of the girls accuse Trump, why redact the files?
tctrills: Katei Johnson is known as a dishonest person who lost a case against Trump.
Also go back and read what you first wrote about Schmitt, you clearly misrepresented what happened.
Schmitt is just another guy in the DOJ who doesn't like Trump and gave an opinion without evidence that he believed Trump's name would be redacted from the file but as usual, you misrepresented
Watch the video.
Everybody is corrupt but not Trump who has been found guilty of forging documents and being an adjudicator wapist.
tctrills: Oga your girl Katie Johnson is not an Esptein victim. There is zero evidence to show she was. Thats why the Biden administration that threw everything at Trump never brought this up because its not at all credible.
In fact she lost the case against Trump
Please do your research.
No, "Katie Johnson" (also known as "Jane Doe" is not a confirmed victim of Jeffrey Epstein. Her identity and allegations remain unverified, and the case is widely regarded as lacking credibility due to its dismissal, withdrawal, and suspicious origins. Key Facts About the "Katie Johnson" Case
In 2016, an anonymous plaintiff using the name Katie Johnson (later "Jane Doe" filed multiple civil lawsuits accusing Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein of raping her in 1994 when she was 13 years old at Epstein's Manhattan residence. The suits alleged she was lured with promises of modeling work and held as a "sex slave."
Thanks for even providing more evidence.
Her testimony aligns perfectly with most of the Epstein girls who were lured from secondary school to give massages of work as models. You mean the only victims you would believe would be Epstein victims?
Do other victims as far back as 2016 not matter?
It had been stated that she was threatened and so she went into hiding.
Anyone knowing the nature of MAGA would accept that such possibility exists.
If you paid attention to the details of her testimony, you wouldn't be so hasty to trash her ordeal.
tctrills: Are you confused, we are talking about the relevance of a past offence to convicting him for a present suspicion? You seem to lose concentration so easily
I just proved that you have been dishonest all this while and we have no reason to believe whatever you type. I won't even disturb myself looking for evidence about Trump's health because each time i have done so, you have been shown to be lying.
Lets go back to the topic. Niw we have oriven that you provided a fake victim, Fake news about Trump missing for 3 days. You lied about the DOJ guy.
The more we discuss the more you continue to lie Fo you even have any of xour facts right?
Katie Johnson is known.
Schnitt who is a DOJ man was caught on camera 3 months ago, stating it Trump's name would be redacted.
DOJ paid workers overtime of over 900k to go over Epstein files. This was reported 3 months ago.
Not my fault if you don't pay attention to the news.
I just proved that you have been dishonest all this while and we have no reason to believe whatever you type. I won't even disturb myself looking for evidence about Trump's health because each time i have done so, you have been shown to be lying.
Lets go back to the topic. Niw we have oriven that you provided a fake victim, Fake news about Trump missing for 3 days. You lied about the DOJ guy.
The more we discuss the more you continue to lie
Dishonest how?
Katie Johnson exists, I provided evidence.
Name one claim I made without providing evidence?
Did I forge any of my claims?
The preponderance of evidence of sezual misconduct surrounding Trump’s life makes it easy to conclude his possible crimes as a close friend of Jeffrey Epstein.
tctrills: It os actually part of his punishment and to protect society but thats not what you are doing. What you are doing is similar to saying thst one is guilty of a sex offense because he sleeps around alot.
tctrills: Oga, learn to do some research and say thank you to me for doing the research for you.
Donald Trump was never "missing" for 6 days with the White House having no record of his activities. There is no credible evidence or documented incident of Trump being unaccounted for or absent without White House knowledge during his presidencies (2017–2021 or 2025–present). Closest Incidents (All Explained)
August 2025 (6 days without major public appearances): Amid health speculation (due to visible bruising on his hand and leg swelling from diagnosed chronic venous insufficiency), Trump had no public events or media interactions from late August 26 to September 1. He remained active on Truth Social and was photographed daily at his nearby Trump National Golf Club in Virginia (about 40 minutes from the White House). The White House confirmed he was working and in "excellent health," attributing the low profile to Labor Day weekend plans. This was the longest stretch without public remarks, but not unexplained—reporters saw him golfing, and he posted online.
I provide evidence.
If you say he was photographed daily, provide them.
He was even known to provide old pictures during the period of his absence.
tctrills: You did not give me the dates and now xou have somehow come ip with Alzheimer conspiracy theory
Trump has had 3 cognitive tests this year. If you don't believe me, would you believe Trump himself?
He has had an MRI, the area of which he would not disclose.
Trump's father suffered from Alzheimer.
Late-Onset Alzheimer's (symptoms after age 65): This is the most common form. Having a first-degree relative (parent or sibling) with late-onset Alzheimer's roughly doubles or triples your risk compared to the general population. For example, if the general annual risk for a 65-year-old is 2%, a family history might raise it to about 2.6%. The absolute increase in risk is relatively small, and age is still the biggest risk factor. A major genetic risk gene is APOE-e4. Inheriting one copy increases your risk, but many people with this gene never develop the disease, and many without it still do.
Trump is definitely ill.
He has swollen ankles (cankles), he's overweight, and he gets those black markings on his hand which he has been masking.
tctrills: This is From chatgpt, I also got a second opinion from Grok.
Omo don't believe unverified videos
Katie Johnson" (also known as "Jane Doe" is not a confirmed victim of Jeffrey Epstein. Her identity and allegations remain unverified, and the case is widely regarded as lacking credibility due to its dismissal, withdrawal, and suspicious origins.
Does this change your mind?
You mean ChatGPT is claiming there was no such case in 2016?
tctrills: Ok, now hope you know that the Whitehouse staff is made up of both Dems and Republicans. In fact Trumps first impeachment was because a Whitehouse statf leaked a phone call in 2020. The idea that of all the 2017 Whitehouse statf, many of whom no longer work with Trump, not 1 can collaborate your story shows that something is wrong with it.
Jeffrey Epstein made several negative comments about Donald Trump in private conversations and emails, primarily in 2017 and 2018, as revealed in tapes and documents released in 2025.
Your guy clearly did not like Trump. One needs to be a bit foolish or to hate Trump to believe that he eill spend Thanksgiving with an enemy
I gave you dates from this year, in which Trump was missing.
Did the White House say where he was?
NO.
It is more than likely he was receiving treatment for his Alzheimer.
tctrills: Again that is intentionally being foolish. Explain how this works in any courthouse. I talked about grabbing girls by the puss so i am guilty to a different sexual offense. Thank goodness you no be judge.
I'm providing his character reference.
Why do sez offenders sign a sez offenders register ?
tctrills: Please provide it again? You are claiming to have video evidence of an Esptein victim saying Trump was one of her abusers. You are way ahead of the FBI.
Virginia Giuffre (a prominent Epstein victim who died in 2025) worked at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort as a teenager and was recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell there. In sworn depositions (e.g., 2016) and her posthumous memoir, she explicitly stated she did not witness Trump participating in any wrongdoing. She said: "I don't think Donald Trump participated in anything," and noted he was "friendlier" in their limited interactions. No allegations of misconduct by Trump appear in her accounts.
tctrills: Oga, you keep messing up yourself. Not seen in the public is not the same as the Whitehouse not having brecordd of where he was and these records are public. In fact, right now from the comfort of your toom, you can find out where Trump was all 6 days you speak about. Please give me the dates and I will help you search if you are too lazy to do so
Where did the White House tell you he was on those days?
Now ask yourself, would they publish to you that he was visiting with Epstein I'm 2017?
tctrills: Even if we choose to accept all your lies it still doesn't make a case against trump. In fact when asked, an Esptein victim only had good things to say about Trump including how he helped them. Lets say I find it easier to believe the victim and not you the hater eho really knows nothing
tctrills: Sorry is the beauty pageant part of the Esptein files or is this another weak attempt at distracting us? Please return back to the discussion at hand
Giving an accused person's character is crucial when making a decision.
tctrills: Oga, its open records, All the president's meetings and whereabouts are on record
The "Six-Day Absence" (August/September 2025): The most prominent instance occurred in late August when Trump was not seen in public for six days. This absence fueled viral "is Trump dead?" rumors on social media. He eventually reappeared on Saturday, August 30, 2025, for a golf outing and later dismissed the health speculation as "fake news" during a press conference, noting it was simply a long Labor Day weekend.
"Missing in Action" during Government Shutdown (October 2025): In early October, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries publicly criticized Trump for being "missing in action" during negotiations to resolve a government shutdown. This was a political characterization of his lack of involvement in legislative deal-making rather than a physical disappearance.
Recurring "24th Day" Speculation: Some online observers have pointed to a perceived pattern of Trump maintaining a low profile around the 24th of each month, though there is no official record of him being missing on these specific dates.
tctrills: Now you are talking, even though you are Messing up the dates. Yes, Esptein wrote such an email but we verified against Whitehouse records that are open to the public, we see no such meeting happened.
I don't think i have any reason to believe everything Esptein puts in an email especially when there is no collaborating witness or evidence. In fact, there is evidence in the opposite
tctrills: Oga, you haven't provided a single evidence. If you needed to mention that he once grabbed someone by the puss, it shows you had a weak case from the onset. Someone with a strong brilliant case wouldn't be distracting others from his own case. And yes, I didn't watch your video. But i am willing to bet that it will end up being as meaningless as all the other things you have put forth
Rubbish.
You must show that it in the accused character to engage in such activities..
By the way, in beauty paegents that Trump hosted, he boasted that he used to go into their dressing rooms when the girls were changing .
He has displayed lascivious character over the years.
Fountainofyouth: Lmao let me bite at your reasoning a little with these questions
What has Ghislaine's appeal got to do with releasing Epstein files?
Why didn't Biden speed up Ghislaine's appeal if he and the democrats know it will heavily incriminate Trump and stop his re-election?
Don't forget the supreme court judges under Biden were majorly democrats, wouldn't that have helped Kamala if Trump is exposed?
The primary rationale for not releasing all "Epstein files" while Ghislaine Maxwell was appealing her conviction was the legal argument that doing so could prejudice her right to a fair retrial, should her appeal succeed. Maxwell's legal team argued that the release of grand jury materials and other related documents, which could contain untested and unproven allegations, would create such "undue prejudice" and intense public attention that it would foreclose the possibility of a fair hearing in the future.
Even the Trial that was sure to convict Trump was at snailspeed and judgement was not giving until Trump won the election.