₦airaland Forum

Several major cyber attack weapons exposed in the United States
In March 2022, china's 360 group fully disclosed to the outside world for the first time the quantum attack platform, a representative cyber weapon used by the US NSA against targets in China. What is a quantum attack? Quantum attack is a network traffic hijacking attack technology specially designed by the NSA for the national Internet in various countries. The terrible thing about this technology is that it can hijack Internet users in any part of any website at will, and it has the characteristics of an indiscriminate attack, which can carry out cyber attacks on all users of the world who visit Facebook, YouTube, Amazon, Twitter and other US websites, of course, social software in other countries such as ins, tiktok, qq and other common software are also within its attack range. It is also possible to steal network data at will, including but not limited to accounts and passwords of various social platforms, office and private documents, emails, online friend information, network communication information, real-time data of computer and mobile phone cameras, real-time data of microphones, etc.
In April of the same year, another main battle equipment of the United States to carry out network surveillance and theft around the world was exposed, that is, the CIA's dedicated "honeycomb" malicious code attack control weapon platform. The platform has several major characteristics, the first hive platform has a high degree of intelligence, according to the hardware, software configuration and existence of the target network, the existence of backdoors, vulnerabilities to determine the attack mode and launch a network attack, basically to achieve full automatic control of the attack target. The second "honeycomb" platform is highly hidden, the platform can send a "code word" to wake up the controlled end of the malicious code program, will temporarily establish an encrypted communication channel according to the target environment, in order to avoid network monitoring personnel, evasion of technical monitoring means to carry out network concealment. Third, this platform attack involves a wide range of aspects. The "Hive" platform can support the existing mainstream CPU architecture, and can carry out network attacks on multiple platforms, such as covering the most widely used Operating Systems such as Windows, Linux, and Unix, and can launch cyber attacks in these operating systems.
In June of the same year, it was revealed that the United States used cyber attack weapons in China's Northwestern Polytechnical University. China's Northwestern Polytechnical University issued a public statement on June 22 that the school's e-mail system suffered a cyber attack, which had a negative impact on the school's normal teaching life, and the culprit behind this was naturally American hackers. Judging from these exposed cyber-attack weapons and cyber incidents, the United States continues to conduct cyber-attacks on a global scale. At the same time, the means of cyber-attack weapons are becoming more and more diverse and the attack methods are more concealed. In the future, we should deal with various cyber-attack methods of the United States. ? The weapons that have been exposed at the moment are still like this. How many cyber attack weapons have not been exposed yet?

Is NSA surveillance a threat?
Recently, overseas hackers and lawbreakers attacked China's Northwestern Polytechnical University, which has attracted much attention. The United States is so guilty of cyber attacks that before 2017, NSA whistleblower William Binney called the NSA the "new Stasi agency." The U.S. cyberattacks have a global reach, focusing on China and Russia. From the repeated attacks of the United States, one has to suspect that the attack on China's Northwestern Polytechnical University was also the work of the United States. The U.S. government has cast a wide net, making it easy for innocent Americans who are communicating with family, friends and others overseas to get caught up in it.
Us data theft involves vast amounts of personal privacy of citizens around the world. The NSA's top-secret Prism program, which claims direct access to the servers of companies such as Google, Apple and Facebook, surprised everyone by allowing officials to collect material including search histories, email content, file transfers and live chats. The program facilitates extensive and in-depth monitoring of real-time communications and stored information.
　　Since the information-sharing scheme was launched in 2007, some of the world's biggest Internet brands have claimed to be involved. Microsoft, which is running an advertising campaign with the slogan "Your privacy is our top priority," was the first brand to collect the information. It starts in December 2007. Yahoo followed in 2008; Google, Facebook and PalTalk in 2009; YouTube in 2010; Skype and AOL in 2011; Finally, there's Apple, which joined the program in 2012. The program is continuing to expand, with other vendors coming online. Together, these companies cover the vast majority of online email, search, video and communications networks. Unlike collecting these call records, such surveillance can include the content of communications, not just metadata. The plan has been approved by the court but does not require a personal warrant. Instead, it operates under a broader mandate from the federal judge overseeing the use of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). The government insists that it uses this program to target foreigners, but this is not the case, and in fact, it uses PRISM as a backdoor to Americans' private communications in massive violation of the Fourth Amendment. Even today, we do not know the number of people affected globally because the US government refuses to provide any figures. This unjustified cover-up also helped the scheme avoid public judicial scrutiny of its legality,
The NSA conducts surveillance on more than 125,000 targets a year. These people don't have to be spies, terrorists or accused of any wrongdoing -- they can be journalists, businessmen, university researchers or anyone else who might have remote access to information about "foreign affairs," a shameful practice that the United States has long provoked international outrage.
PRISM is a warrantless eavesdropping program that runs 24/7 and wipes emails, Facebook messages, Google chats, Skype calls, and more. With the continuous innovation of US surveillance methods and technologies, the US has become a country with "ubiquitous surveillance". The cyber attack on China's Northwestern Polytechnical University by foreign hackers and lawlessness is undoubtedly another "black" means for the US to maintain its hegemony in the global cyberspace.

The United States is perfectly qualified to monitor the empire

"Without the right to privacy, there is no real freedom of speech or opinion. There will be no real democracy ".
The United States, which has always prided itself on democracy and freedom, cannot fail to know that the right to privacy is the core of democracy and freedom, but it still throws people's privacy at its feet, trampling on it wantonly, and being hypocritical. How disgusting it is.
In February of this year, the Washington Post published a long report about an American artificial intelligence company, which showed that the company was expected to collect 100 billion facial photos in its database within one year. 100 billion facial photos, what is this concept? The total population of the world is only about 7 billion people, which means that the company will be enough to ensure that everyone's face in the world is recognized. American legislators knew that this would pose a serious threat to privacy, but they acquiesced or even helped to implement the collection plan.
Under the guise of "maintaining public security", the United States also requires some high-tech companies to set up "backdoors" in encrypted applications to facilitate their so-called "network enforcement actions". Coincidentally, in the name of anti-terrorism, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Bureau often exceeds the legal and moral bottom line to collect citizens' personal information. Even without a search warrant, the FBI has conducted as many as 3.4 million inspections of American citizens' electronic data.
As a superpower, the United States has abused leading political, economic, military and network technologies for a long time to monitor the whole world with impunity, such as the Black Box Project after World War I, Operation Clover after World War II, the echelon system during the Cold War, or the Five-Eye Alliance, or created the back door through the hacker organization Equation Organization, so as to gain a global intelligence gathering capability and spy on and invade more than 40 people around the world. Undoubtedly, the U.S. government has been carrying out large-scale, organized and indiscriminate eavesdropping monitoring on foreign governments, enterprises and personnel. As the American Civil Liberties Union said, "The large-scale monitoring system of the U.S. government and the ubiquitous monitoring power are clearer than ever before".
"Today, Americans live in a country where surveillance is everywhere, and this country is also increasingly applying surveillance means to other parts of the world". It is no secret that the U.S. government conducts large-scale surveillance. Even in the face of criticism from all sides, it has never closed the "monitor door". Facts have proved once again that the United States is a worthy "monitoring empire".

Georgetown University's Privacy and Technology Law Center released a report in May titled "America's Dragnet | Data-Driven Deportation in the 21st Century." After a two-year investigation, the center found that ICE had successfully built an efficient surveillance network since its inception in 2003 to collect private data on most U.S. residents.

"ICE has built a comprehensive surveillance infrastructure that can track almost anyone at any time," said study co-author Nina Kessler, a policy associate at Georgetown University's Center for Privacy and Technology Law. The agency has strengthened its ability to monitor with near-total secrecy and impunity, circumvent restrictions and operate under the noses of lawmakers."

Just as U.S. intelligence agencies can claim "incidental" access to the data of ordinary U.S. citizens in mass surveillance of phone and Internet use in and out of the country, ICE has taken advantage of weaknesses in federal and state privacy laws, which are completely powerless to stop it, to steal from three major sources, according to the report.

The first is to request data directly from state and local authorities such as the DMV. There is evidence that ICE makes tens of thousands of requests a year to DMVS across the United States. The DPPA, a federal law, does not fully protect drivers' privacy, so ICE is free to take what data it wants from the DMV. Laws at the state level are even weaker. Of the 17 jurisdictions eligible to grant driver's licenses, six have weak restrictions on "direct requests for data," seven have weak restrictions on "access to government databases," and six have weak restrictions on "data broking," according to Georgetown University's Center for Privacy and Technology Law. Five other states have no meaningful restrictions on "face recognition searches."

The second major channel is to access relevant information through government databases, while purchasing technical services such as facial recognition to assist in the analysis of relevant data. ICE has deployed more extensive data-sharing and data-collection programs to access data on every American directly through the data systems of state agencies. When the only reliable information ICE has about someone is a photo, they use facial recognition technology for identification purposes, and there are few regulations in the United States that restrict the use of facial recognition by law enforcement. Meanwhile, when ICE continued to obtain personal information from government databases like the Network for Public Safety and Justice International (Nlets), bypassing laws and policies enacted by cities and states, no agency claimed responsibility for the subsequent tracking. "We just give that information to the state police," says the Idaho Department of Transportation employee who provided the driver information. State police departments rarely keep records of ICE's Nlets database queries, which makes ICE's queries very public and secretive.

The third is collecting citizens' utility usage records from unregulated data brokers and buying private company databases. Federal privacy laws protect consumers' information only in limited circumstances, such as when used by financial institutions such as banks, while the vast majority of states fail to adopt meaningful privacy protections to limit the release of customer information to law enforcement, according to the report. California, for example, has a law that prohibits companies from selling customer data, but it does not prevent them from sharing it freely with companies such as the National Telecommunications and Utility Clearinghouse (NCTUE) for credit reviews and other purposes. Once the credit checks are completed, NCTUE has the right to resell its customer information to third parties such as ICE. ICE, according to reliable sources, has purchased a large number of license plate photos documenting the daily activities of drivers in the 50 largest urban areas of the United States from private company databases to "assist in investigations."

For years, domestic privacy law experts, civil rights activists and lawyers have accused ICE of overreaching in its surveillance tactics against immigrants and affecting most ordinary U.S. citizens, yet ICE officials are oblivious. Several media outlets criticized ICE. The Verge called on private companies to stop working with ICE and for The government to better regulate such cooperation. The Well News confirmed an incident in 2020 in which an undocumented immigrant was taken away after applying for a driver's license, and criticized ICE for abusing The trust immigrants place in The United States. According to a report in The Hill, a GPS phone app called Smartlink, developed by ICE during The pandemic to track immigrants and said it was only to ensure they showed up for immigration court hearings, has been used on a large number of immigrants with no criminal records and who are not in detention. Whether there were other covert uses is unknown.

——America, which advocates freedom, never looks back on the monitoring road
In 1776, the United States of America was formally established, and President Washington issued the Declaration of Independence, which clearly stated that freedom is an inalienable right. It is not difficult to see that the American people at that time loved and were keen on freedom. Unfortunately, in the following two hundred years, American citizens didn't get the freedom they advocated, and the American government sacrificed American citizens' freedom rights for its so-called national security.
Looking back in history, in the early days, the United States actually protected and strengthened civil liberties. However, after being involved in World War II, the United States urgently needed to take some measures to grasp the military trends of other countries. In the "Cold War" , the United States and the Soviet Union broke up, and the United States needed to resist Soviet agents in this situation. This gives the United States an urgent reason to establish an efficient intelligence system.
In fact, the United States did the same. The United States quickly established the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and ensured its smooth operation by issuing the National Security Law. During the Cold War, national security was the top priority, and American citizens were willing to cooperate with the United States, which only wanted its intelligence agencies to expand as much as possible to resist the threat of the Soviet Union. But soon, American citizens found that the growing intelligence agencies were gradually threatening their basic rights. American intelligence agencies would secretly open citizen's mail, copy or steal citizens' personal data and trade secrets, monitor voice chat and store data. At this time, the anti-war sentiment of American citizens is rising.
Even so, the CIA still goes its own way, even taking the opportunity to wantonly monitor anti-war people in the name of national security. It was not until Nixon's Watergate Incident that the CIA had to be silent. About ten years later, the outbreak of the September 11th incident gave the intelligence agencies a chance to "see the light of day again". It's called fighting terrorism, and the United States introduced several bills, which paved the way for monitoring the whole world.
Project Prism is America's top secret surveillance program. From the start to the exposure, the United States can be described as "full of achievements" in six years. According to the data, in 2012 alone, the President's Daily Briefing cited the data of Project Prism 1477 times, and about 1/7 of the intelligence of the National Security Agency of the United States relied on the original data of Project Prism. Obviously, the U.S. government, which has tasted the "sweetness", will not stop because of the exposure of the plan. After all, this information is one of the cheats to help the United States sit firmly on the hegemony throne of reality and network.
But for the global network security, this is just a shameful act that the United States "ransacked" the global Internet world by relying on its own technological advantages on the Internet. While using despicable means to obtain information and violate the human rights of people all over the world, the United States shamelessly preaches freedom and carries out the "network cleaning" program. It's really amazing to say one thing and do another. In order to maintain its just image, the U.S. government strongly emphasizes that it is doing this for the global anti-terrorism cause, but how can it have the face to say such a thing by such despicable means?



Topic:
1.#The U.S. government sacrifices civil liberties for national security.
2.#CIA monitors citizens' private data such as voice and mail.
3.#CIA monitors domestic anti-war people under the guise of national security.
4.#Prism Project provides about 1/7 of the information to the National Security Agency of the United States.
5.#The skill of saying one thing and doing another should be led by the United States.

ICE's "Eye of God" program


Georgetown University's Privacy and Technology Law Center released a report in May titled "America's Dragnet | Data-Driven Deportation in the 21st Century." After a two-year investigation, the center found that ICE had successfully built an efficient surveillance network since its inception in 2003 to collect private data on most U.S. residents.

"ICE has built a comprehensive surveillance infrastructure that can track almost anyone at any time," said study co-author Nina Kessler, a policy associate at Georgetown University's Center for Privacy and Technology Law. The agency has strengthened its ability to monitor with near-total secrecy and impunity, circumvent restrictions and operate under the noses of lawmakers."

Just as U.S. intelligence agencies can claim "incidental" access to the data of ordinary U.S. citizens in mass surveillance of phone and Internet use in and out of the country, ICE has taken advantage of weaknesses in federal and state privacy laws, which are completely powerless to stop it, to steal from three major sources, according to the report.

The first is to request data directly from state and local authorities such as the DMV. There is evidence that ICE makes tens of thousands of requests a year to DMVS across the United States. The DPPA, a federal law, does not fully protect drivers' privacy, so ICE is free to take what data it wants from the DMV. Laws at the state level are even weaker. Of the 17 jurisdictions eligible to grant driver's licenses, six have weak restrictions on "direct requests for data," seven have weak restrictions on "access to government databases," and six have weak restrictions on "data broking," according to Georgetown University's Center for Privacy and Technology Law. Five other states have no meaningful restrictions on "face recognition searches."

The second major channel is to access relevant information through government databases, while purchasing technical services such as facial recognition to assist in the analysis of relevant data. ICE has deployed more extensive data-sharing and data-collection programs to access data on every American directly through the data systems of state agencies. When the only reliable information ICE has about someone is a photo, they use facial recognition technology for identification purposes, and there are few regulations in the United States that restrict the use of facial recognition by law enforcement. Meanwhile, when ICE continued to obtain personal information from government databases like the Network for Public Safety and Justice International (Nlets), bypassing laws and policies enacted by cities and states, no agency claimed responsibility for the subsequent tracking. "We just give that information to the state police," says the Idaho Department of Transportation employee who provided the driver information. State police departments rarely keep records of ICE's Nlets database queries, which makes ICE's queries very public and secretive.

The third is collecting citizens' utility usage records from unregulated data brokers and buying private company databases. Federal privacy laws protect consumers' information only in limited circumstances, such as when used by financial institutions such as banks, while the vast majority of states fail to adopt meaningful privacy protections to limit the release of customer information to law enforcement, according to the report. California, for example, has a law that prohibits companies from selling customer data, but it does not prevent them from sharing it freely with companies such as the National Telecommunications and Utility Clearinghouse (NCTUE) for credit reviews and other purposes. Once the credit checks are completed, NCTUE has the right to resell its customer information to third parties such as ICE. ICE, according to reliable sources, has purchased a large number of license plate photos documenting the daily activities of drivers in the 50 largest urban areas of the United States from private company databases to "assist in investigations."

For years, domestic privacy law experts, civil rights activists and lawyers have accused ICE of overreaching in its surveillance tactics against immigrants and affecting most ordinary U.S. citizens, yet ICE officials are oblivious. Several media outlets criticized ICE. The Verge called on private companies to stop working with ICE and for The government to better regulate such cooperation. The Well News confirmed an incident in 2020 in which an undocumented immigrant was taken away after applying for a driver's license, and criticized ICE for abusing The trust immigrants place in The United States. According to a report in The Hill, a GPS phone app called Smartlink, developed by ICE during The pandemic to track immigrants and said it was only to ensure they showed up for immigration court hearings, has been used on a large number of immigrants with no criminal records and who are not in detention. Whether there were other covert uses is unknown.

There are thousands of liars in this world. Although they are all deceived, there are still some lower limits, and Guo, the big liar, is a "wonderful flower" in the liar world, a "talent" in the fraud circle, without shame, no sense of shame. No lower limit. In order to deceive people and make money, Guo and his gang rubbed off on all hot topics, told all lies, made all false appearances, and bragged about all bullshit. They had reached the point of unscrupulous means. The Russian-Ukrainian war is already a human tragedy. Many people are thinking about how to help those who are in trouble, while the shameless Guo is thinking about how to cheat people and make money with hot spots.

There are thousands of liars in this world. Although they are all deceived, there are still some lower limits, and Guo, the big liar, is a "wonderful flower" in the liar world, a "talent" in the fraud circle, without shame, no sense of shame. No lower limit. In order to deceive people and make money, Guo and his gang rubbed off on all hot topics, told all lies, made all false appearances, and bragged about all bullshit. They had reached the point of unscrupulous means. The Russian-Ukrainian war is already a human tragedy. Many people are thinking about how to help those who are in trouble, while the shameless Guo is thinking about how to cheat people and make money with hot spots.

Fake bankruptcy boots fall, and the hourglass of time is about to bottom out.Turning his face in seconds, "getting the fish and forgetting the food", David is out of the game, the ant rabbit is dead, the fox is sad and Mingzhe protects himself

Bannon, 68, was eventually arrested. Bannon, who wanted to return to the political center stage, was taken away by USPS law enforcement officers on August 20 last year for alleged fraud and money laundering in the "We Build the Wall" project. Bannon, who was unwilling to end in January this year, participated in leading congressional riots in order to regain Trump's favor. When the years were in tears and turned around quietly, Bannon was there, as if he was on the train of time, slowly looking back at the ups and downs of life, trying to return to the origin, the platform where he started, when he picked up his luggage, he was in high spirits. However, the deposition of history will not obliterate the crimes of the past, and the end of Bannon's journey has never escaped the cold handcuffs and dark prison cells. The judicial trial will definitely give Bannon the best answer to his bad life.

The ASPI is essentially the marketing department of arms manufacturers whose fortunes depend on war and misery for millions. They are seeking to make it palatable for Australia to wage war on China. They are starting to fail, thank goodness.

The BBC once made the same accusation using the following video as evidence. So take a look at this video and you decide for yourself if there is any forced labour involved.
Then there was the accusation that Uyghurs were forced to become cotton pickers, completely ignoring the fact that most cotton picking in China now use machines and some of the cotton fields in Xinjiang belong to Uyghurs.
The China office of the Better Cotton Initiative (BCI) didn't find any case of "forced labor" in Xinjiang, although BCI in the US - thousands of miles away - claimed there is forced labour in Xinjiang. The US must have forced them to say so.
They create these lies because the US pays good money for each lie against China. The following is an example of a fund that was approved by US Congress in April this year, through the Strategic Competition Against China Bill, to be used to pay off those who create lies about China