₦airaland Forum

iLoveYouToo:
Nice analysis. What’s your take on the allegations Natasha made against the senate president?

If you’ve made these known in the past, kindly share the links with me

Natasha made a claim without any evidence whatsoever, there's nothing to review in her case till evidence is presented. I have nothing to say about an unsubstantiated allegation

Omoawoke:
Have you used this same brain to review Natasha’s claims too?

There's no evidence to review in Natasha's case. She made an allegation against the SP and didn't provide any evidence, what am I supposed to review there? Did you see their recent photograph together where they're both smiling with their teeth out? Don't stress yourself for any of these politicians at all, you'll get burned

ClearFlair:
Be asking me

You made a claim and I asked for evidence to substantiate your claim, what'd I do wrong?

alobright17:
Have you reviewed Natasha's claimed and also asked why she's not posting evidence? Or your duty is just to review one side of the devide?

You guys seem to think I'm on Natasha's side of this divide, I couldn't care less about her tbh. I watched prof Mgbeke's video, saw some irregularities and pointed them out. Natasha has not provided any evidence to backup her claims and she was photographed smiling sheepishly with the SP, a man she publicly accused of unwarranted sexual advances.... they're all unserious characters in the comic that is the Nigerian political space. They're both of a similar frame in my mind.

emkz:
Extremely brilliant review.

Let us also review your review.



My own thoughts on your review.

Your review reeks of fallacy of ad hominem. Instead of addressing the issues raised, you veered into an attack on the personality of Professor Mgbeke. This strategy mirrors Natasha's strategy from day 1, and speaks of disturbing unintelligence. Instead of addressing the matter of shouting in the senate and behaving like a thug, she brought up an unrelated matter of sexual allegations. When the senate ethics committee sat to hear the matter, Oby Ezekwesili launched a marauding attack on Onyekachi Nwaebonyi which caused the ethics committee to postpone the hearing indefinitely. Whenever Natasha is asked for evidence, she raises her voice. Now, Professor Mgbeke has submitted evidence, and the best Natasha could do was submit links saying Professor Mgbeke is a scammer, was thrown out by her landlord and co. If Professor Mgbeke is indeed a scammer, Natasha contacting her also establishes that fact on Natasha, because "show me who your friends are, and I will tell you who you are".

Finally, your review falls short of academic standards. You reviewed Professor Mgbeke, but did not review what she said. Your strategy is to discredit Professor Mgbeke, so that by so doing, no one would believe what she said. This would automatically prevent you from defending what Professor Mgbeke said against Natasha. If you want to toe that line, Natasha lied in the past against Reno Omokri and deleted all the evidence when Reno exposed her lie. Someone close to her paid Reno compensation to abandon the matter. If Professor Mgbeke is discredited, please can you explain to us why we should believe Natasha, given her antecedents?

Hello emkz,

I like your review. I did not watch the parts you spoke about, I'll have to go watch the full video and revert, I was pretty tired after the long day yesterday. Give me till EOD and I'll modify this comment with my observations from the full video. Again, I'll ignore your insults and condescension because they have no bearing on the issue at hand. Have a great weekend bro👍

Okeona:
Why didn't you review evidences against Natasha and flaw them?

Focus on her point rather let's see how objective you are

I don't understand your comment bro, I made a review of prof Mgbeke's video. If you want to review any of Natasha's video, you're free to do so

casualobserver:
Are you a useful eed iot too or are you auditioning for the role?

Look it is clear there is something suspicious about the woman. I also noticed some of the things you mentioned. I just put it down the the elevation of chartalans into our public space.

You claim you are being objective, you are not.

You are attacking her character and maybe rightly so but you have not addressed the substance of what she posted.

I believe the calls happened and there is evidence. Why focus on the call from the SP but ignore the interaction with Natasha on the same phone? Natasha denied knowing or ever talking to her. The same phone that you use rightly to question the involvement of the SP is the same phone that proves there were interactions with Natasha.


What I think happened is this: All these activists are paid attack dogs. Sandra was contacted by Natasha to play a role but for some reason she decided against it. It could be because she developed a conscience or more likely because she decided her interests were better served by taking the info to the SP. So she contacted the SP and was paid a higher fee and double crossed Natasha. The fact that she changed sides and now has a relationship with the SP does not mean her info is not real…..focus of the evidence not on the characters.


All parties in this are dubious characters. What an objective person should do is deal with the evidence!

The fact that I am a habitual liar or a fraudster does not mean I am not telling the truth. It is up to you if you are truly objective to look beyond the characters involved and look at the evidence.

I don’t think Sandra is clean but I believe the recording I heard and I believe the evidence of contact with Natasha which she denies.


Natasha has made claims claims she has evidence of sexual harassment but all she has done is muddy the waters and whipping up sentiment without showing any evidence. All she has done is frustrate any efforts to present her case. Whatever the shadowy nature of this Sandra woman, like I have said all these activists and NGOs are shadowy characters, she claimed to have evidence and released the evidence. Is the evidence real and damaging…to me it is. Can you prove her evidence is manufactured that the recorded voice calls are fake or the callhistory with Natasha is fake? That is all that matters…. Everything else is immaterial.

I'll ignore your insults because you brought up some fine points and I'll like to respond to them.
Firstly, I stated already in my op that politicians bore and irritate me, all of them bar one so I have no vested interest in which way the case finally ends up, only the truth interests me.
Secondly, I do not know Natasha's number, I cannot confirm if the number shown on Prof's phone is actually Natasha's contact. Prof says she has VN evidence but I didn't hear any VN in the video so I can't speak on that.
Thirdly, I agree that most activists are paid attack dogs, it's a known fact actually and totally not unexpected.
Fourthly, I did not speak about Natasha's allegations because they're just mere allegations with no evidence presented so far, same reason I didn't talk about Prof Mgbeke's VN claim.

jogojogo:
Where una see this number 1? I have seen the video severally and never saw this. Can we see the screenshot please

I added a screenshot in my op, it's around minute 47 of the full clip.

bixton:
You have tried but yo huaven't done justice t the issue. Do you remember those armed robbers who sometime years ago robbed a bank in Kwara State, when Hon. Saraki was still SP and it was found out that in the mobile phones of one of the robbers, he had the SP contact details in it, the SP denied knowing them and investigations was done and I can't remember what happened after. But Nigerians stood on the side of Saraki because he was fighting the President of the he FRN as at that time and a majority of us the masses saw it as a plot by the FG.
Can you liken it to that of Prof. Ngbeke claiming not know Akpabio.
I do hope you know many of us have in our phones contact of people we can't truly say we know them or have any relationship with them whatsoever.

Now, back to the issue of Sen. Natasha...
I keep wondering why she brought up a sexual harassment allegation against the SP and she has refused to take the issue to Court!!!

Why did Sen. Natasha have to wait for how many months or years before bringing up the sexual harassment issue just because her seat was changed and she refused to abide by the rules of the legislative house !!!


So many things are really off about Sen. Natasha and judging by her past, she seems to flaunt her beauty to drag potential men into blackmail if they don't do her bidding....

Hello bixton, SP Akpabio's contact was top in prof Mgbeke's recent list not just contact, I'm guessing you know how WhatsApp works. Secondly, if you look at that part well enough, you'll see that there was a Whatsapp call between her and SP very recently.

As I have stated before, I didn't bring up Natasha's claims against SP cause they're all alleged for now, I am in no position to know if it's true or not and my review was strictly on prof Mgbeke's video

buhariguy:
have you reviewed Natasha allegations against akpabio,
She said her husband were behind them when akpabio were sexually harrasing her with words, without touching her or raping her in the presence of her husband,
You supporting Natasha should be ashamed for stupidity,
Such allegations shouldn't be mentioned at all

I never said I supported Natasha, where's this coming from? I did a thread about Prof Mgbeke's video ONLY.

Tareq1105:
You were biased in your assessment.

Why didn't you ask Natasha to respond and bring out evidence to counter Prof assertions?

Natasha needs to come up with something stronger bcoz both of them actually chatted.

Yes, it's possible she may not have met Akpabio before now but common she might be asking for financial reward from him for the information she has about Natasha plan to bring him down.

The truth is Natasha and Prof fell out and she decided to blow everything. Just listen to the audio again.

Hello Tareq, I'm guessing you didn't watch parts or all of the video (I didn't watch all of it too so don't be embarrassed ). Prof claims that she has never spoken to SP and that she didn't know Natasha from Adam, at least till Natasha chatted her up to frame SP.
I do not know Natasha, how can I ask her to respond to prof Mgbeke? Besides I think I say something about Natasha's rebuttal of the video yesterday too, just search for it.

yemre:
Bro, that's a very good review of professor Sandra Duru's claims there but a crucial part where her evidence (recorded conversation) was mentioned was left out. Why?

Also left out was Natasha's part of the story where she made an allegation but unable to produce an evidence of her allegations. Why?

I don't want to believe this is deliberate!

Your review has to be balanced for us to know you are not writing based on sentiments or emotions.

I've not said any of them is right or wrong but a balanced review and presentation of proofs will do Justice to this matter without biases.

Peace!

Hello yemre, I didn't hear any VN in the video, prof Mgbeke saying she has a VN is not evidence enough for me, that's just conjecture till the vn comes out. As for Natasha's allegations against SP, I did not speak about it because it's still alleged, not proven in anyway and my review was on Prof's video.

creativejagaban:
The headless mob are fighting back.

The movie go long.....


Just because Natasha is on to destroy 'yoruba' government, as she calls it, the useful idiots gang are happy and will go to any length to support the agenda.


But remember, Tinubu till 2031.
Then it goes to the north.
Then it goes to the South South.
Then it goes to the north.
Then it goes to the South West.
Then it goes to the north.
Then it goes to the South South.
Then it goes to the north.
Then it goes to the South West.
...
Till year 3,000

Don't be foolish pls, I couldn't care less who leads you guys. I'll be leaving the country soon anyway and have never voted for presidential election before. I'm comfortable enough that whoever leads the country won't affect me. I don't like the way the current leadership is panning out but I certainly do not wish him ill.

Nice video. MC jollof captures my thoughts that I penned down in the thread below very beautifully, the Prof's conduct is definitely fishy.

https://www.nairaland.com/8415341/review-prof-mgbekes-video

Hello landers.

So I got back from work today to see Prof Mgbeke Sandra Duru's video, while I did not watch everything from start to finish, I did notice some inconsistencies I'll like to point out.

1. Prof Mgbeke claims she does not know SP Akpabio but a review of her live video shows that he's saved in her phone and is actually one of her most recent chats. It's also shown clearly in the video @ 47 mins in, that she was in a voice call with him recently. Don't take my word for it, investigate by yourself.

2. Her failed attempts to pronounce some basic Igbo names in an attempt to seem posh we're easy to see through. This is a lady that lived and worked in the East for many years, some of those years were in the corridors of power in Imo state, how can she not know these pronunciations?

3. She has not explained why Natasha contacted her in the first place. Sounds ridiculous that Natasha will send such messages to someone she does not know (prof Mgbeke claims she didn't know Natasha till Natasha reached out to her via Whatsapp), sending messages that could destroy her if exposed to an untrusted and unvetted third party? How's that make sense??

4. Prof Mgbeke claims she has integrity because she was raised by Whites....(I have personal issues with that line of thought but I am trying to be free of sentiments in my review)...It is a fact that Prof Mgbeke has had dealings in the past with politicians in Nigeria, infact it is stated that she thought about forming a party to contest for imo governorship herself, and many allegations were made against her character, such a person valuing integrity is laughable. Show me a politician who values integrity, they're all the same to me, none of them impresses me (with the exception of one who shall not be named as they're not party to this shit show).

So there you have it, I tried to remain objective and impartial. My final conclusion, I think prof Mgbeke is being malicious and fraudulent in her assertions.

CreativeOrbit:
Professor Mgbeke previously asserted that she did not know Senator Godswill Akpabio.

However, upon presenting her phone call logs as evidence, Senator Akpabio’s contact details appeared prominently, listed as the second entry. Additionally, Senator Ned Nwoko’s number appeared third in the sequence.

This discrepancy raises serious questions about the credibility of her statement and suggests a deliberate attempt to mislead the public.

The person she gave the phone to to search for Natasha's name no help her at all

Sandra claims she does not know Akpabio but she has his number saved and did a voice call with him as seen in her video when she gave it to the second person to search for Natasha's name...her foolish efforts to vilify Natasha are easy to see through.

Obvious rejection, she dey run go another man country without money? You have to have enough money to cover your expenses for a certain period before a country can grant you visa.

taiwolomo1:
Then no de everly do give away for men

Jazzy does giveaway to all genders

Wealthoptulent:
una go jus call MILLIONAIRE jus like dat base on Meter wey dey ACCOUNT BALANCE for a WHILE, the BOY wey WIY GAVE 20meters, the MILLIONAIRE then, where him dey today, now a PAUPER again? this MONEY BAGS TITLES are for ASSETS not LEDGER or AVAIL BAL..

the THING dey VEX ME

You are the one in the wrong. A millionaire is someone who has at 1 million networth, your account balance is part of that. Getting angry at someone while being in the wrong is a crazy thing

Fetula4u:
let them keep deceiving you 😂

Deceiving as in how?

Melagros:
COMRADES are speechless, submission before the camera, abi? After the camera, what next? Fight and quarrel ba?

Context bro, understand context before commenting.

Well Sandra Duru's posts definitely had a lot of holes it it. For one, she was forming so hard not to know how to pronounce some Ibo names (I knew it was most likely an act, the pronunciation part at least). Secondly, she claimed not to know Natasha before she was contacted recently, how in the hell does it make sense for Natasha to expose herself to you, someone she just met? Thirdly, she claims she was raised by whites in USA, and has utmost integrity, now it's clear that she was raised in Nigeria and she dabbled a lot into politics, name one person with integrity in politics.

Let's see how this plays out sha.

ClearFlair:
She's a politician who has always made life easier for her people. Not many politicians in Nigeria do that

With which evidence?

Uche559:
She must be very close to Natasha for Natasha to share all Dis with her. Birds of d same feather they say......... Is Like one is cashing out n d other is not......women

You didn't watch the videos. She stated that she doesn't know Natasha from anywhere, it does seem very farfetched that Natasha will send such damaging information to someone she doesn't know. Whether true or not, politics is truly a dirty game.

ClearFlair:
Senator Natasha is best senator in Nigeria by a longshot

Why?

Angelfrost:
Well, the updated gist is that it's EFCC that took the young man into custody...!

I think it's regarding the statements he made concerning the selective arrest and indictment of Igbo celebs after E-Money was arrested.

I thought as much, no bank will arrest someone like vdm without cause.

Afonja007:
is like your family members are amongst GTB owner .the same GTB bank that refused to pay innoson 20 billion he won against them ,

He won 20bn against GTB and GTB, a bank that's law bound to honour court orders, didn't pay and nothing happened? Did you even follow the case or you're just vomiting what you heard or saw somewhere

Angelfrost:
Nigerian Judiciary is an embarrassment to this nation...! Along with our law enforcement agents.


Why should the wealthy and privileged continue to use them as tools of oppression against the less privileged or average citizens?!!

Well... GTBank has messed up here.

This is terribly poor optics... Practically an admission of guilt.

In these times where banks are already having declining profits and reduction in client investments... Acquiring a negative image from a man of high influence like VDM is deeply unwise.

The bank can't come out looking good from this...! They should just released a statement clarifying the complaint and addressing it, or simply called him privately to sort it out.

I'm confused, vdm himself stated that the bank was complying and working with him, why would GTB arrest him?

mightyhaze:
Them don use Amala politics and Tuwo politics kpai Naira for over 5 decades of rudderless and theiving rulership..

But we're in Nigeria so if you hear billionaire, odds are the person is talking about naira terms.

jmoore:
Billionaire is 1 billion dollars, pounds or euros and above.

Stop bastardizing the word 'billionaire'.

Why not naira?

Unclebayo:
I’m just hearing about it for the first time… I browsed it now but I saw different categories, which do you recommend among all please

Don't bother, it's very expensive and does not whiten the teeth