Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 10:48am On Apr 29, 2020 |
AkpaMgbor: Lol here goes a white worshipper..what does that even mean in your last paragraph? Does it mean you have no mind and reasoning of your own? You can't even understand how an explosion will start creating things and life but you think it makes sense?? My goodness! You worship the whites also, can’t you see how you worship the god of your fathers? We’re conversing in their language using their technology You’re wearing their clothes Your education Your vehicles houses, roads, electricity, phones, method of cooking, plastic, shoes, medicine... I digress, the only thing you own is the color of your skin. Here you are asking me if I have a my mind of my own while still clinging on to the beliefs your white slave masters beat into your grandfather I understand how an explosion can create life, I have typed this several times. It is you whose increased befuddledment of subject continues to amuse me. |
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 10:39am On Apr 29, 2020 |
AkpaMgbor: In job 40: 15-24 you will see the beast behemoth mentioned there..when God asked job if he can explain the might of the animal(obviously that means Job himself knew the beast).. 1. In that chapter it was said that a behemoth had bones as strong as bars of iron 2. That it's tail was swung like the cedar tree( a very large tree) 3. That it ate grass 4. That even in the Jordan rivers overflowing it does not fear, as it can wade inside and have its drink 5. That it's strength was in the belly, meaning it had a huge torso..read it I will wait..then care to explain any animal you know in modern history with such characteristics... Such a magnificent creature surely must have fossils somewhere. Where are its bones? I thought the book of Job was a parable? |
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 10:35am On Apr 29, 2020 |
Jokerman: This is because the resurrected man, told us things that will happens after his resurrection, and they are still happening and would continue to the end of the word...
Moreover time magazine some years ago actually acknowledged that Jesus was the most significant man that ever walk on the Earth.. So you would believe a man who tells you he will resurrect after dying? Fear ‘God’ and say it with your chest that you will. Time magazine? Really?  |
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 10:29am On Apr 29, 2020 |
AkpaMgbor: I don't even have an instagram account. That being said, if creation is a theory, it is a much more believable and logical theory than the mumbo jumbo of an explosion that has no sentient character being able to create a perfectly balanced universe and life..do you even know what an explosion does?? It destroys..not create. I don’t mean to be rude but do you understand English? HOW WAS THE UNIVERSE CREATED THEN? By God, according to you right? Now that we have established that is what you believe. Can you in your wildest dreams tell me how God did it? No. But science can. Science tells you it is the Big Bang. The Big Bang is the widely accepted thesis as to how the universe was created whether it was created or it was random. Can I tell you how an explosion works? No, because apparently you already know more than white PHD bearing scientists that gave you the word ‘explosion’ which I am pretty sure your language has no name for Creation IS a theory |
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 10:18am On Apr 29, 2020 |
AkpaMgbor: If you bothered to read the Bible then you will know that science itself validates a creator and not the other way..even the subject of the Op being dinosaurs was mentioned on in the Bible way before man 'discovered' their bones in recent history.. I was born a Christian, forced to read the Bible from Genesis to Revelation every year through one program or the other. I did not see any mention of dinosaurs, kindly educate me |
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 10:16am On Apr 29, 2020 |
AkpaMgbor: He saw all the evidence and still doubted, that is to show that all the evidence of God in creation/nature will not change the hardest of hearts..Yet Thomas in his later years proclaimed CHRIST till the day of his execution.. What evidence will make you believe a dead man is now suddenly alive? One man’s doubt has now become an idiom. |
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 10:13am On Apr 29, 2020 |
Jokerman: Scientists already determined the ultimate fate of the universe, to two possible scenarios, however actually they lead to the universe being burned up in a fiery heat..
St Peter stated it before men could study about the universe:
2 Peter 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up. Six possible scenarios, the Big Freeze and Big Rip are the widely accepted hypothesis, none of which you mentioned up there. Most religions believe in the fiery death of the universe Science also tell you there is no god, but you accept one minute hypothesis of the end of the universe which is not even the accepted thesis |
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 9:55am On Apr 29, 2020 |
AkpaMgbor: Their ego is so laughable if it wasn't sad and destructive on its own..they reference Einstein in science discussions when not even he dared to think that there was no intelligence behind the universe..na these new wannabe atheist(not scientists o) strut about with those theories...it gives them a sense of increased Intelligence Quotient. Reading memes on Ig will not educate you the way google will. Einstein was a creationist, creationism is still a theory.
|
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 9:48am On Apr 29, 2020 |
Jokerman: This is because science corroborates everything the Bible specifically talked of even before the Advent of space exploration and it's ilks Example? |
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 9:37am On Apr 29, 2020 |
Jokerman: We want you to believe along with other scientists that the big bang was formed by God.
Scientists states that universe is about 14 billion years i.e when the big bang event occured and then expansion continued from there... We ain't arguing, our argument is that God is the centre of everything Why? |
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 9:14am On Apr 29, 2020 |
AkpaMgbor: And their hypothesis is that a random thoughtless, consciousless, inanimate explosion formed the universe and all that lives in it? Including animate and living beings...beings that have morals, emotions, intelligence and consciences?? That is their hypothesis? What a balooney! This universe and all that's in it was designed and created..none life CANNOT give life..something that has no conscience cannot give conscience. Something that can't think(as in explosion) CANNOT then create what can think on its own...something that has NO morality CANNOT give morality...the universe and man was preconceived, designed and created..by who is a question you can answer for yourself (and is another subject).... What is your bane exactly? You do not understand how the universe came to be by a Big Bang or you do not believe whoever preconceived, designed and created our universe did it by an explosion? Whatever creationist ideas you have are your business, hypothetically since you cannot comprehend the Big Bang being a random act, why can’t you just believe that it was not random but a way for the ‘creator’ to create your universe? Science is based on FACTS, and facts are there is no proof that the universe was created by any being. That is why science calls it ‘RANDOM’. Of course there are creationists in science who ‘believe’ the universe must have been brought about by something but science cannot tell you what it does not know, it tells what it does know. They didn’t just come with the Big Bang, a whole lot of physics and maths accompany what you think is just an explosion, a whole lot of calculations, generations of it. I’m sorry to say you are not qualified to speak on it, because you can not even understand it. How can you refute something you don’t understand in the first place? The Big Bang hypotheses is widely accepted by Astro scientists far more knowledgeable than yourself for a reason, the scientists that dispute it, do so also for a reason. You dispute it because “ITS DOESN’T MAKE SENSE” while not giving a reason. How do you believe the universe was “created”? Mention me when you have something concrete to say. By the way, the chemicals in your brain are responsible for perceived concepts of morality, conscience, emotions. I wouldn’t make too much of those terms if I were you. |
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 5:12am On Apr 29, 2020 |
Jokerman: The Bible has proven to be true in every ramification By the way, where is the proof? |
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 5:06am On Apr 29, 2020 |
AkpaMgbor: The biggest falsehood that I have ever known! To think that this earth that is finely tuned to sustain all manner of life from the ozone layers to the water bodies to the climate and soil...to think that the sun and moon that are placed at the exact distance to sustain life on earth(the slightest placement of the sun closer by a few kilometres will eradicate ALL life on earth)..that all these came together in a finely balanced equilibrium to sustain life, that it happened by a fvcking random explosion! An explosion destroys and doesn't create! An explosion does NOT think! It does not reason YET this explosion SOMEHOW created our solar system down to the beetle that burrows the earth..how did an explosion mix together inanimate materials to create the first living cell?? Tell us what happened then, some people have tried to make sense of it and you reject their hypothesis. What is your hypothesis? How did the universe come to be? You can’t just say something is wrong without inference from your own experiments, because this topic defies human logic and requires actual physics. Not your layman logic. That cannot be it therefore it is not it. You don’t even have a theory that can disproved or proved. Just belief, like the religious. |
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 5:02am On Apr 29, 2020 |
|
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 4:54am On Apr 29, 2020 |
Tetrahedron: If you believe this fantasy of sci- fi then the joke is on you. 100 million years! Did u hear yourself? Go and read about charles darwin and the scam of evolution theory!
6,000 years according to the Bible and I believe it. There was an eye witness vs evolution drawn in cartoons
 Guru Maraji has witnesses right now, so did prophet Mohammed If you knew anything and your school fees were not a waste, you might have understood how carbon dating works Why won’t you believe it? Your ancestors were flogged because they rejected it, you are still feeling the lashes today |
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 4:49am On Apr 29, 2020 |
AdmiralDru: Like I said earlier, science and Tech is a broad field. That you are an expert in aerospace doesn't mean you know much about space science. There are electricians and mechanics who are good in their fields but don't know much about space. Space science is mostly astronomy, astrology and astrophysics. 2. I'm an atheist. 3. I took some networking classes in school and have my Ccna. Radio tech is different from space science. All that billions of years talk has nothing to do with real science, they're there so science have it's own answer to how the world came to be. Christians swallow everything in the Bible and would argue with you based on what's in the Bible even if it makes no sense, that's the same way big bang theorists argue. They tell you scientists said this and that.
know this. The big bang was never observed, neither was Evol. The reason it's popular is cause that's the most accepted theory that makes sense out of all the suggested theories by scientists of that time. I hope you know this before you call anyone stupid for not agreeing with you. Also, you don't believe in theories. You either prove them to be correct or refute their claims.
Cc wirinet Kingxsamz Fucsheetup This guy again, who talks a whole lot of smack but can disprove nothing. I keep hoping you’ll talk about the star that was found to be older than the universe itself or at least something like this - It violates the first law of thermodynamics, which says you can't create or destroy matter or energy. Critics claim that the big bang theory suggests the universe began out of nothing. Proponents of the big bang theory say that such criticism is unwarranted for two reasons. The first is that the big bang doesn't address the creation of the universe, but rather the evolution of it. The other reason is that since the laws of science break down as you approach the creation of the universe, there's no reason to believe the first law of thermodynamics would apply. Some critics say that the formation of stars and galaxies violates the law of entropy, which suggests systems of change become less organized over time. But if you view the early universe as completely homogeneous and isotropic, then the current universe shows signs of obeying the law of entropy. Some astrophysicists and cosmologists argue that scientists have misinterpreted evidence like the redshift of celestial bodies and the cosmic microwave background radiation. Some cite the absence of exotic cosmic bodies that should have been the product of the big bang according to the theory. The early inflationary period of the big bang appears to violate the rule that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. Proponents have a few different responses to this criticism. One is that at the start of the big bang, the theory of relativity didn't apply. As a result, there was no issue with traveling faster than the speed of light. Another related response is that space itself can expand faster than the speed of light, as space falls outside the domain of the theory of gravity Or at least speak about the other theories like plasma cosmology or the big bounce BUT HE KNOWS NOTHING ABOUT ANY OF THIS, HE JUST KNOWS IT IS A THEORY Even the rejectors of the Big Bang know why they rejected it, and have their own theories to supplement.. I gave you several chances to tell me why you feel the Big Bang theory did not happen but you know nothing. |
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 4:32am On Apr 29, 2020 |
Jokerman: Lol... It's not a matter of religion. Even scientists agree that God created all things...
Nothing in this world was a result of explosion of some gases ...
God created the Nebula (whatever name scientists decided to call it) and all things. No wonder we have this song
"All things bright and beautiful, all things great and small, all things bright and wonderful, the Lord God made them all" K |
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 9:15pm On Apr 28, 2020 |
Fucsheetup: Thats your inference due to your religion which I could care less about. I’m just making it clear to you that stars and the planets that orbit them (Solar systems) come from nebulae.
P.S again.. The sun is a star
|
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 9:13pm On Apr 28, 2020 |
Jokerman: Some dying stars form their own nebula. However from your explanation, we have come to agree the God created all things nebula (the suppose birthplace of stars and the sun too)? Thats your inference due to your religion which I could care less about. I’m just making it clear to you that stars and the planets that orbit them (Solar systems) come from nebulae. P.S again.. The sun is a star |
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 9:04pm On Apr 28, 2020 |
Jokerman: So you ridicule the marvelous works of God to a mere explosion of dying planetary bodies i.e stars etc or some "pillars of creation"? Science though 
Can you see the solar system is perfectly designed by some intelligent being billion and trillion of light years ahead??
Think lady. Think. Oh my word. Nebulae are not explosion from dying planetery bodies. Can’t God have created the nebulae from which your solar system was born? How do you believe in a solar system but not believe in the birthplace of one? How dumb can you be? |
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 8:41pm On Apr 28, 2020 |
GodSaklek: If he doesn't believe in theory, evolution, science etc, then why he believe in technology, how did he believe that if he buy Recharge cards, he can talk to people he doesn't know their whereabouts, he can use smart phones, watch live events on TV in his house, travel to abroad with flying plane.. Our earth is 4.5billion years old,and our solar system is also 4.5billion years old, definitely everything in our solar system exist at the same time, scientists have machines that calculate the existence or age of anything on earth, don't believe in nonsense u red in Bible, even those people that wrote it are the same whites.. He is a hypocrite who doesn’t even know what he’s talking about. The fact that all that does not amaze him has left me befuddled. |
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 8:22pm On Apr 28, 2020 |
Jokerman: I know what Nebula is i.e Orion etc...
Our bone of discussion is that God created everything, and not some supernova bullshit What created the supernova then? Are you saying you don’t believe our solar system came out of a nebula? Do you know how many nebulae there are currently spitting out solar systems like ours? You definitely do not know what a nebula is. A supernova is not a nebula |
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 6:18pm On Apr 28, 2020 |
Jokerman: Lies. God created all things.... Stars, the sun, micro organisms etc Do you understand English? Your god created you but your mom did the reproduction on Earth, the same way a nebula is just like a womb pushing out stars. P.S The sun is a star. |
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 5:09pm On Apr 28, 2020 |
m140: Na you go school na, me ke... na you get sense pass na, and na you to first gi school or live abroad 8f you ain't staying here . I guess you still watching CNN and BBC to see how less dangerous covid is. Huh.  |
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 5:08pm On Apr 28, 2020 |
Jokerman: Lol... Nebula got me laughing sis. 
Pseudo science though  A nebula is the birthplace of all stars, eg Your sun. The Hubble telescope is out in space taking pictures of these wonderments for your pleasure and you call it pseudo science? For your information, the same technology that allows invisible waves carry your voice across the world to your relative abroad is the same that enables us to see these pictures taken light years away. Or do you think the stars you see at night are a hologram? Even if you do, you cannot refute the sun. |
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 5:02pm On Apr 28, 2020 |
Jokerman: Sorry I don't do religion. I'm only a follower of the Lord Jesus Christ.
Well acknowledging God does that disprove science, you are right...
My only problem with evolutionary science is the continuos lies You don’t do religion but follow Jesus Christ, What is Christianity to you? What continuous lies? Educate me |
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 4:59pm On Apr 28, 2020 |
ABINTUK: Whites so much hate Africa... Everything bad must be attributed to Africa... They hate Africa? Or Africa hates itself? |
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 4:59pm On Apr 28, 2020 |
wirinet: Most South Americans are catholics, because the continent was invaded and colonised by Spain. Yhe number of traditionalists are very small. These are the few tribes in North America that was not completely conquered. The were allowed to live is small isolated reserves. I disproved your earlier claim. That is not always the case? Why exactly are you telling me this? |
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 4:57pm On Apr 28, 2020 |
Jokerman: How great scientists like Newton, Einstein Charles Presley etc can acknowledge God, I wonder why someone who use a dilapidated twisted little laboratory to conduct simple pendulum and titration experiment would think otherwise Acknowledging God does not disprove science. Every man with their own belief of how the universe works and was created. I wonder though, if you were born in the north you would be somewhere arguing on a different thread for Allah’s sake because your parents and your environment helped shape what you believe is anything and everything. Forever worship the white man for bringing you the true god and forcing your ancestors to rubbish their beliefs a hundred years ago. I guess you were lucky to be born into the right religion with the most authentic god. |
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 4:50pm On Apr 28, 2020 |
AdmiralDru: Ever heard about the military industrial complex. It's one of the reasons America is in debts in trillions of dollars cause there are people profiting off the war. It's the same thing with NASA and space science. Basically, astronauts have helped us understand our world better, but when you start mentioning shit and saying something happened 13 billion years ago, you don't need a fortune teller to tell you it's a hoax.
These theories have been disapproved by fellow scientists over time, but they never go mainstream. You keep speaking of theories you cannot disprove yourself so I’ll take this off your hands. You seem to have access to underground space information, kindly point me to a source. |
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 4:47pm On Apr 28, 2020 |
wirinet: You forgot to add that we are a conquered people. A conquered people have no choice but to worship the gods of their conqueror. Red Indians are a conquered people. They still worship their own gods. |
Science/Technology › Re: Africa’s Sahara ‘Most Dangerous Place On Earth’ 100 Million Years Ago (Photo) by Fucsheetup(f): 4:46pm On Apr 28, 2020 |
|