snoopy:

Your statement is highly contradictory sir. You agreed infrastructural development started before the oil boom and they stated that infrastructural development wasn't implemented due to lack of funds....it is also pertinent to note that MOST of the basic infrastructure was built BEFORE the oil boom and NOT after. Our top universities were built and nutured to world class standards with proceeds from agriculture before neglect set in...most of the basic institutions were also built with such proceeds and the same government has failed to maintain these infrastructure with current proceeds from oil so i fail to understand your argument sir.

snoopy:

They don't operate refineries in Nigeria sir plus these oil majors have in recent times been reluctant to pursue new investments in Nigeria due to security concerns

snoopy:

Again what sectors of the economy are these investments coming in? and i will appreciate some examples as well because these claims appear to be vague

snoopy:

in what aspect of the economy are these "investments" because if you are referring to the oil industry, dominant players like shell are actually divesting their assets in Nigeria as a result of the immense corruption that abound in the system.
http://businessdayonline.com/2013/10/oil-blocks-divestment-shell-sends-document-to-prospective-buyers/

snoopy:

these "beautiful" statistics will appear to the ordinary man on the street as a disrespect to his sensibilities, as these are self-serving indices that has only benefited the ruling class and has not translated to a better life for the ordinary citizens, how do you reconcile that ma'am?

snoopy:

1 million? that figure is bogus and highly questionable ma'am, even to the most ignorant Nigerian, do you by any chance have any references to establish the credibility of these figures?

Ayomitide77: I dnt think I have that time cos I hav lectures throughout 2day and 2moro.Maybe finestboi will have to consider me and my partner.

yuzedo:
I was hoping you’d cite the source of this information and provide an immediate link to back up this assertion. Honestly, you didn’t put forth any argument in your opening statement; you only supplied known information.

damoskiy: i disagree ma....if i have access to all your information i can send kidnappers after you and get down with you.

damoskiy: That is the reason every teacher must know their students.Social network serve as a medium of interaction, in which the teacher can give extra classes online to less participating students.

That can lead to something else

damoskiy: We have students who are stubborn,
some are struggling in class while some
are shy to speak up in class and these
sets of students refuse to ask of help. It
becomes so hard for teachers to reach
these students, if teachers are not ban
from interacting with their students via
social networking, those set of students
would be able to reach out to their
teachers and request help on topics they
might not understand. Some student
can be embarrased about asking
questions in front of their peers. how would they grow if they are shy to speak with their teachers

damoskiy: We have students who are stubborn,
some are struggling in class while some
are shy to speak up in class and these
sets of students refuse to ask of help. It
becomes so hard for teachers to reach
these students, if teachers are not ban
from interacting with their students via
social networking, those set of students
would be able to reach out to their
teachers and request help on topics they
might not understand. Some students
can be embarrased about asking
questions in front of their peers. how would they grow if they are shy to speak with their teachers