₦airaland Forum

Sodomy the worst of evils

Wake up out your slumber

Wow

Greetings


We know this truth all over America that cave beasts were created by ancient Black gods. These Black gods were Giants until Blacks today we have shrunk in size, height and brain capacity. This was the curse put on us by Allah for mixing with animals and creating hybrids for slaves in mines and launching them against other Africans in war. I keep telling y'all yet you don't listen, there was never a group of Whites attack Blacks without another group of Blacks behind them. This is althoughout Black history everywhere we used the Whites as slaves and mercenaries for thousands of years and this downfall is our karma.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mz5LR7tB320


Wake up out your slumber

MuttleyLaff:
"Then Adam had intercourse with his wife, and she became pregnant.
She bore a son and said,
"By the LORD's help I have gotten a son." So she named him Cain."
- Genesis 4:1

As we can see from Genesis, Eve thinks the promise and prophecy in Genesis 3:15 is fulfilled and so believed she has acquired, when she hasnt In fact that promise and prophecy in Genesis 3:15, wont happen until 4000 years later, lol. Eve so much believed in Cain, that upon Abel's birth, she discounted him off and regarded him as being unworthy of consideration to the extent he was named Abel, indicating that he is moisture, breath, vapor, something shortlived, meaning he is something that is here today and gone tomorrow.

True to nature, true to the power of the tongue, true to the name given to him by his mother, Abel truly became something that is here today and gone tomorrow, all thanks and credit to Cain.

Godhatesodomy, out of curiosity, did you just pull "Cain means cursed" out of your rear back? Just asking ni ooo.

Satan? The Serpent Seed View of Genesis 3:15 By Robert Velarde

Bible Answer ManHank Hanegraaff

“Here is what really happened in the Garden of Eden. The Word says that Eve was beguiled by the serpent. She was actually seduced by the serpent….He was so close to being human that his seed could, and did mingle with that of the woman and cause her to conceive. When this happened, God cursed the serpent.” —William Branham1

Branham (1909–65), a proponent of Oneness theology,2 taught the so-called serpent seed interpretation of Genesis 3, with adherents of this view often citing Genesis 3:15 in support of their position: “And I will put enmity between you [the serpent] and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel” (ESV).

The crux of the serpent seed view is that Eve and Satan engaged in sexual relations. Consequently, sin is viewed as sexual in nature, as opposed to the traditional interpretation of the fall as sin being disobedience to God. In addition to Branham, other serpent seed interpretations of Genesis 3:15 are found in the teachings of the Christian Identity movement, as well as, for instance, in the teachings of Arnold Murray (1929–2014) of Shepherd’s Chapel and also the Unification Church.

The Identity movement’s serpent seed interpretation clearly leads to racism, as one expert explains: “As early as the mid-1940s, Identity preachers were building a new doctrine: the Serpent Seed theory. It is a fairly simple and straightforward belief: Jews are the physical descendants of a sexual union between ‘Mother Eve’ and ‘the serpent’ (Gen. 3). The serpent is variously identified as either Satan, or a demonic representative of Satan. As such, Jews are literally ‘Children of the Devil.’ Most Identity believers claim the serpent was a physical manifestation of Satan himself.”3 Furthermore, Identity teachers add that Cain is the offspring of a union of the serpent and Eve, while Abel is said to be the result of the union of Adam and Eve.4

Even if the serpent seed doctrine does not overtly lead to racism, the interpretation remains problematic and unwarranted. Before exploring responses to the perspective and examining the biblical texts more closely, this article will first present how Genesis 3:15 is interpreted by supporters of the serpent seed teaching.

The Seduction. Branham explains, “He seduced her [Eve] and by her did Satan have a child vicariously. Cain bore the full spiritual characteristics of Satan and the animalistic (sensual, fleshly) characteristic of the serpent.”5

Some proponents of the serpent seed doctrine point to the word “beguiled” in Genesis 3:13 (KJV) as evidence of Eve being sexually seduced by the serpent. This requires the interpreter to suggest that “beguiled” in this context actually means sexually seduced. However, in contemporary translations, the Hebrew word that the King James renders as “beguiled” is often translated as “deceived” (ESV, NIV, HCSB, NLT) or “tricked” (NRSV, NET), while none of these translations render the word as “seduced” or imply sexual seduction. In short, “beguiled” means to charm, enchant, deceive, or trick. In context, Eve is blaming the serpent for tricking her into eating the fruit of the forbidden tree. She is not stating that the serpent seduced her sexually.

Another approach to arriving at the serpent seed interpretation is Branham’s view that the Tree of Life in Genesis refers to Jesus. Branham exposits, “If the Tree Of Life is a person, then the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil is a person ALSO. It can’t be otherwise. Thus the Righteous One and the Wicked One stood side by side there in the midst of the Garden of Eden” (emphasis in original).6 By arguing that Jesus is the Tree of Life, Branham then concludes that the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil is Satan (the serpent). This leads Branham to conclude that the sin in the Garden of Eden involved sexual relations between Eve and Satan.

The Seed of Satan. In the King James Version, the first portion of Genesis 3:15 reads, “And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed.” The view that both seeds are literal has resulted in the serpent seed doctrine sometimes being called the “two seed” interpretation. Most modern translations render “seed” as “offspring,” while granting that the Hebrew word is “seed.” Whether the word is translated as “seed” or “offspring” is not crucial. The question in reference to the serpent seed view is, does this passage mean that Eve and the serpent (Satan) had sexual relations resulting in the birth of a child and, as a result, a line of human beings that are literal descendants of Satan?

This leads to a problematic theological assumption, namely, that it is possible for demons to manifest physical bodies, engage in sexual relations with humans, and produce offspring. However, strong biblical arguments can be made against such claims.7 For instance, in Luke 24:39, Jesus states that “a spirit does not have flesh and bones” (ESV). In any event, even if one believes that demons may engage in sexual intercourse with humans, it does not necessarily follow that the serpent seed interpretation is correct.

Disobedience. What are the hermeneutical errors present in the serpent seed interpretation? The primary error is that of eisegesis—reading into the biblical text what is not actually present within the text. There is nothing in Genesis 3:15 or the surrounding context to indicate the sin of the garden involved sexual relations between Eve and the serpent. In fact, other passages throughout the Bible clearly indicate that the sin in the garden had to do with disobedience to God, not sexual relations: “Scripture is clear that the first sin was not sexual but rather consisted of Adam’s disobedience to God’s command not to eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil ([Gen.] 2:16–17).”8 This point demonstrates at least two other principles of sound hermeneutics: (1) allow Scripture to interpret Scripture and (2) examine the entirety of biblical teaching on a subject rather than interpreting passages in isolation. A third overarching hermeneutical principle is context. Given the context of Genesis 3:15, as well as the context of the whole of Scripture, we learn that the passage in question underscores humanity’s proclivity toward sin and disobedience to God, not sexual relations with the serpent and the rise of a demonic line of humans. Finally, adherents of the serpent seed doctrine ignore more viable and clear interpretations of the passages in question.

Regarding the Christian Identity movement’s racist interpretation of the passage, R. Alan Streett lists several problems with the Identity movement’s serpent seed teaching: “First, Israel traces its origin to Jacob, not Abel, when the former’s name was changed to Israel. Second, Abraham, not Cain, is called the father of the Jews. Third, all must be born again. Fourth, Jesus reminded the woman of Samaria that ‘salvation is from the Jews’ (John 4:22).

Fifth, and most important, Jesus was a Jew from the tribe of Judah; thus, according to this theory, He would be the enemy, not the Son of God.”9

Genesis 3:15 as Protoevangelium. There is good reason for calling Genesis 3:15 the “Protoevangelium,” that is, the “first gospel” or first instance of the gospel in the Bible. Rather than teaching the serpent seed doctrine, the passage encapsulates the centrality of the gospel message: “It has traditionally been understood as pointing forward to the defeat of the serpent by a future descendant of the woman…This defeat is implied by the serpent’s being bruised in the head, which is more serious than the offspring of Eve being bruised in the heel. For this reason, v. 15 has been labeled the ‘Protoevangelium,’ the first announcement of the gospel.”10

The Apologetics Study Bible adds, “The language is figurative, indicating the life-and-death struggle between the adversary and the human family borne by the woman….[The passage refers] to the ongoing opposition to the people of God by their enemies and [predicts] the rise of a particular seed, Jesus Christ, who will destroy the serpent in the end (Rom. 16:20; Rev. 12:9–10).”11 Ultimately, Christ delivered the crushing blow to Satan via His sacrificial atonement and miraculous resurrection.

As to serpent seed interpretations that lead to racism, the Bible is clearly opposed to racist ideas: “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus” (Gal. 3:28 ESV).

Finally, the serpent seed interpretation leads to a severe misunderstanding of the true nature of sin, which is that sin is essentially disobedience to the Holy Lord. The account of humanity’s downfall is tragic enough as plainly stated without having to sensationalize it with the unfounded view that Eve and Satan engaged in sexual relations. It is for these reasons that the serpent seed doctrine should be soundly rejected. —Robert Velarde






You need to read for yourself and stop trying to force others to read for you. There are countless books, articles, lectures on Cain being the seed of Satan. This isn't something I made up. I just explained it according to DNA and African history. That is a group of Blacks called Babylonians created the Cro Magnum Jews by mixing human with animal DNA. Then these Moors taught the cave beast sciences of Egypt, how to make steel and to rule over other Moors.. The original war was always Africans versus Africans in control over the Earth. Ancient Africans were the Giants and Gods of mythology. The ancient Greek gods, Sumerians, Indians, Celts, Vikings and Americas are all of the original race. The devil is the evil African who created the cave beast and whose spirit went into him. When the White man worships Satan he puts on all Black because he knows that the evil Africans created him. Even the satanic Roman Vatican priests wears all Black and he too knows. So does the Rabbi wear all Black the synoguge of Satan. They know they are hybrids and that their father was the pedophile dirty Moors of Babylon.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OvI-tkYHOnM


Wake up out your slumber

johnw47:
i suppose telling a coward to be a man is like telling
a leopard to change it's spots

Troll

johnw47:
a poster said refrencig the bible: "satan didn't father cain"
you said "nonsense"
i also gave bible scriptures showing that adam fathered cain through the YHWH miracle of birth
and not through any agency of satan

be a man and stop trying to squirm your way out of it

Cain is an archetype for Canaan.


The Bible is a poetic book like the Quran its written with heavy metaphors.

Wake up out your slumber

Wow

Wow

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/584311/


So they reporting that Russians are persecuting Jehovah Witnesses who are United States Christians when in actuality they are protecting their society from religious predators. Yes Western Europeans are pedophiles and perverts this includes their mulatto classes of Blacks, Asians and Hispanics. As like the Catholic Church the Jehovah Witnesses will knowingly send pedophile clegy into your country endangering your children.



https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theatlantic.com/amp/article/584311/


Wake up out your slumber

Sodomy is worst than White Supremacy

CaveAdullam:
correct.

He is not correct.

Cain means cursed.

Wow

Wow

Wow

Wow

Misplaced Faith

johnw47:
poor coward


"God hates sodomy"

^^^ very true, and satan of course is the father of sodomy
and he is also the one you claim fathered cain:

We Are Not speaking the same code. I was speaking of genetics and the evil spirit i.e Devil means evil spirit under which created them by wicked mixing.


Wake up out your slumber

johnw47:
poor fearful one, you couldn't give bible verse for your false belief that satan fathered cain
and this below is what you have been reduced to:





run run run run runaway

troll

Wake up out your slumber

johnw47:
so this your switching to mor-on mode is another way for you to run away

changing the subject is what you are good at, yellow streak

Troll

johnw47:
^^^ forever the lying runaway coward, of course

Don't feed the trolls.

Wow

Wow

johnw47:
so you have added cowardice to your trolling bragging and lying






you cannot honestly reply to one simple question from this little christian
your thunda fire must be in hiding









LIAR, you didn't give one bible verse showing satan fathered cain
all you big mouth braggart coward can do is lie and run from the matter raised

Trolling

China is creating more billionaires than anywhere in the Earth because they are putting faith in themselves and their ancestors. It is as simple as that. And the Chinese are banning satanic Western European culture which was invited in centuries ago and nearly caused the extinction of the Chinese until the great general godlike president Mao Tse Tung stood up.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88Qils4J284


Wake up out your slumber

Wake up out your slumber

Wow

Wow

Wow

beresponsible:
Villager. They really asked

“They (his friends) asked what can we do and i said ‘buy me new cars’. The limos here are all antique and dead”

And all you can think of is limo to drive on the dusty roads and oppress your people.

Bunch of backward characters

Life has some living rich and some living poor. This is the will of Allah not the Emir.

You should be happy some of your people live good and wanting to make yourself of service so you would rise.


Wake up out your slumber