₦airaland Forum

That hazard goal na.. As in.... as in..... No words to describe it.

Krasid:
Honestly, Madrid would have scored more if City were interested in playing in a UCL final.Right from the get-go of both games, it was evident that City was content in being in a UCL semi-final.Why would Madrid break a sweat when City had already given up before kick-off when we have tougher games coming up against Valencia and a then possible UCL final with Atletico.

look at the statement people who claim to be intelligent in football are making.

Nihilist:
Its also a fact that Madrid didn't actually need to score more than 1 goal so....

so you are telling me that madrid were comfortable to just have 1 own goal (ronaldo happy nt to score), knowing fully well that 1 goal from city can send them parking?

Nihilist:
Didn't they have 2 goals disallowed?

City were disgraceful on Wednesday mehn....utterly disgraceful.

fact remains that they could only score 1 own goal in 180 minutes of ucl football against city; a first time semi finalist.

raumdeuter:
Give up on the fact that the 4th placed EPL team cant muster a shot on target for 90mins vs Madrid? What other evidence do you need to know the league is useless

i no get time for your mary go round. goodnight.

raumdeuter:
WHy would they expend their energy on a team that gave up before kickoff? They just needed a 1-0 win and City wasnt going to score even if they had given them 2 days vs 5 madrid players That is the 4th placed EPL team go check what the 9th placed Bundesliga team did

just give up on this one. you are not sounding intelligent with this claim.

raumdeuter:
Wolfsburg are not in semi because they played Madrid.

For emphasis vs the same madrid City could only get 2 shot on target in 180mins. I am sure Eibar would have done better than the 4th place EPL team

but mancity were in the semi because they played psg, right?

raumdeuter:
Check both games and see what a 9th placed Wolfsburg played vs what a 4th placed City played

it doesn't back up your claim of Madrid not wanting to take the chance of destroying the easiest opponent they have faced so far.

raumdeuter:
Wolfsburg scored 2 goals in 180 mins City had just 2 shots on target in 180mins

Thats the difference. Wolfsburg for emphasis are 9th in Bundesliga City are 4th in EPL

for emphasis, city are ucl semi finalists while wolfsburg are quarter finalists.

raumdeuter:
Because they didnt need to. if madrid needed to score 10 goals vs that City they would score 11. City is th worst semi finalist this year

are you sure you read what you just posted? mehn, this comment is unlike you. you who claim to so much like facts and numbers.

raumdeuter:
Wolfsburg won a game and had Madrid tensed throughout

City couldnt win a single game and were useless both legs

Which question is Ibime asking?

how was man City useless, and could only concede an own goal against the assumed wonderful team for 120 minutes of football?
wolfsburg had Madrid tensed but shipped in 3 goals against city's 1, how?

not ibime's question. I meant my question of how average epl players are in an European final.

raumdeuter:
madrid vs City was the easiest game for them

When madrid played the 9th placed Bundesliga team Wolfsburg they knew what they saw. Vs City they didnt even need to stretch themselves because the 4th placed EPL team is easier than the 9th placed Bundesliga team. if in doubt ask man Utd about their CL journey this season

but then, why couldn't they score more than one own goal for 120 minutes in their easiest ucl match of the season?

raumdeuter:
agree with ibime that what?

That Wolfsburg a 9th placed team in Bundesliga murdered Man Utd and won vs Madrid which City couldnt?

they won Madrid, yet they could not make it to the next round, but city did. at the end of the day, Madrid won both teams with one goal difference.

if don't agree with ibime, then you didn't answer the question.

raumdeuter:
Maybe because Bundesliga teams have bigger fishes to fry like CL which was why Bayern and Wolfsburg were topping EPL teams in their groups and leave the Europa for the useless EPL

Thats why Wolfsburg 9th in Bundesliga were able to top a group with Man utd, Wolfsburg were able to beat Madrid 2-0 at home while Madrid molested City everywhere home away everywhere without even getting out of second gear

so, a 1-0 aggregate is now a molestation in football? i see.
Madrid that struggle to beat man City 1-0 in 120 minutes. a European power house again first time semi finalist. hmm.

raumdeuter:
Maybe because Bundesliga teams have bigger fishes to fry like CL which was why Bayern and Wolfsburg were topping EPL teams in their groups and leave the Europa for the useless EPL

Thats why Wolfsburg 9th in Bundesliga were able to top a group with Man utd, Wolfsburg were able to beat Madrid 2-0 at home while Madrid molested City everywhere home away everywhere without even getting out of second gear

do you now agree with ibime?

all these things wey una dey talk, i no dey understand self. how average epl players go qualify their team for europa league final, but World class bundesliga players no fit do the same for their team. the worst be say, the average players follow send some of the world class players go house. I don't get it. can someone help in explaining this? even the English and Brazilian hype follow dey mastermind the thing.

that hazard's goal was like the ones goalkeepers clap for on their way in. it was like eternity away from the goalkeeper. mehn!! see goal!!!

dake40:
.....Do not ask me for ANTI VIRUS licence key. If you need that, PM me..... Let the game begin.

What you MUST provide.

The software name and Version.

need activation key for pes 2015

Chelseafan1:
Na me and you dey talk, answer me and leave hensben outta this

watch how he will divert.

What i knw is that hazard is a great player that has everything he needs to be like messi and ronaldo.
Though he scored a brace yesterday, i am nt still happy with him.
Why did he opt to pass the ball when one on one with the keeper instead of taking the shot. This is what has made him not to reach his potential. It is just in his head.
He didn't even play half of what he is known for yesterday, yet some guys are hailing his performance because he just scored two goals.
The hazard i want back is the one that creates a chance from every touch of the ball in the attacking third. Goals are important too, bt with a good finisher, assists will be load. He should stand up for set pieces too.
Nawa for that kind human being o.

Ibime:
He got benched because:

(a.) Willian was signed at the end of August for £32m (not Mourinhos signing but he was expected to make the Willian signing work)

(b.) Mata who had returned late from Confederations cup got up to full fitness - the 2 time club player of the year.

(c.) Schurrle the £18m signing who had had an illness in July reurned to full fitness.


So DeBruyne wasn't dropped. He returned to his rightful place in the pecking order which was always the squad plan for the 'small boy' by Emenalo. These multimillion signings were always planned ahead of him in the pecking order as well as MaZaCar who were already first choice. He had played very well in his first 3 games.

we both know the type of person mourinho is. There is no way Kevin will play very well and mou will go back to bench him, no matter the amount of money that was used to sign his competitor.

raumdeuter:
The EPL has been poor for the past few years who did Hazard compete againstt? rookie Harry Kane and Coutinho

This year who are the contenders? Payet, Mahrez and Kante and Vardy. On a good day those a grade 4 players in the world of football

Players who 2 yrs ago were mainly playing in lower divisions

Thats why when its time for Balon D or you wont see any EPL player there

blundersliga player of the year go stil follow vote the epl average players. The epl average players stil send the world class dortmund players packing from d europa.

Ibime:
De Bruyne played very well in his first 3 games. We scored 2 wins and a draw away at Old Trafford.

After that Willian was signed at the end of August, and Schurrle, Mata and co gained full fitness and took priority over him.

The only match they claim he played rubbish (which I didn't watch) was Swindon match.

For example, below is the aggregate player rating for our 1st match vs Hull (Aggregate of all the British newspapers Player ratings)

how can a player play very well and yet be benched. It does nt add up. Though kevin was hardworking, bt his poor ball retention and his aimless crosses,passes and volleys are what let him down.

Nihilist:
I don't think Willian has ever been better than Schurrle, though I agree that Cuadrado was crap.

But what we're discussing, or rather what I'm discussing here is whether Jose was directly responsible for KDB's departure

I don't think it's a coincidence that we has only 2 artists in our team last season.

willian is beta than schurlle, and wl always be. Schurlle is always busy looking for goals without wanting to do the basics and doing what leads to the goal. He keeps wasting half chances and opportunities in search of personal glories; present ronaldo type of player, though ronaldo has perfected his goal scoring.

Ibime:
In that case Jose should have no problem with De Bruyne because De Bruyne doesn't like to dribble.

DeBruynes game is first time everything - first time pass, first time cross. If he dribbles, its only to create space quickly for pass or cross.

this is exactly kevin's style of play. Bt, it has its shortcomings and you knw them. That kind of football does nt give u possession. Just like trial and error footbal.

bigkesh:
We all saw it,didn't we?
Schurrle was average,Willian was clearly better
Salah was just doing rubbish
Cuadrado that was going down more than the naira
As you already said KDB was playing Shit
For those 6months Oscar was clearly better than Mata,I can recall 3 games which Mata started,played trash,Oscar came in and scored.......

Willian and Azpi weren't starters in the beginning,they fought to earn a place....
KDB didn't want to fight for anything.......

I regret losing him though

exactly! I dont knw why they now talk as if they were nt watching chelsea matches then.

raumdeuter:
Everything Hazard brings to the table KdB brings double

For an attacking midfielder like Hazard nothing matters more than goals and assists. Hazard every day is average at these. I was yelling it on the top of my voice last season even when he was winning PFA award

Dribbling only impresses amateurs, The day Ronaldo realized this is when he became a machine

so you are saying that the more than 400 players that voted for hazard as best player in both the epl and ligue 1 are amateurs in the game? That is, you knw beta than them?

Ibime:
Schurrle, Salah and Cuadrado are actually workhorses.

That has nothing to do with it.

Dont assume because Jose got rid of Mata that he can't carry De Bruyne. Matas own case of laziness and physical deficiency is that of a 12 year old boy playing with grown men.

The same Jose that carried Ozil for 3 years in Spain will carry De Bruyne easily.

The funny thing is De Bruyne is actually hardworking. Don't let the debate in the press deceive you.

The situation at Chelsea then was extraordinary in that Chelsea had a nonexistent midfield and Jose had to get the wingers to cover their part of the job.

Only a foolish manager would play Hazard, Mata and DeBruhne ontop midfield of Lampard and Ramires (our starting DMs at the time). The disbalance in the midfield caused Jose to play Schurrle almost every time at the start.

So there are many political, financial and tactical reasons why De Bruyne would not start matches straightaway.

It is nothing for Jose to play DeBruyne when he plays Ozil and Ronaldo in the same midfield.

i don't knw why u guys keep saying that kevin was nt played straight away. Kevin started mou's first three matches at his return. He simply didn't satisfy mou with those three starts.
The players i remember mou did nt do very well in letting to go are, salah and lukaku.

raumdeuter:
Like Ibime said some of you were short sighted. I didnt wait till this season to call Hazard a fraud and its well documented here. I saw KdBruyne at Bremen I saw him as a guy with potential definitely better than Oscar.

Kevin debriyne won the young player of the year in the bundesliga in the 2012/13 season so claiming no one saw KdB is false maybe among football novices like yourself. But Ibime has been shouting KdB here for like 3years

ibime did nt say hazard is a fraud. Hazard is a fraud, yet he has bn winning individual awards since he started to play professional football.

We no dy use you judge. No be wey talk say boateng beta pass football legend like terry.

Ibime:
This is one Chelsea fan who begs to differ. You can dig up my records. I have never been crazy about Hazard, whilst I have had nothing but praise for De Bruyne.

Did you watch Bundesliga in 2013? How would you know De Bruynes quality then? Your experience of DeBruyne then is watching him 10 mins here and there. Don't label me with your experience of him . I process a whole load of information when watching football, for example I hated Oscar since 2012 years before ninjas clocked how useless he was. The same nonsense you notice now, I noticed as soon as he joined the club. Also I understood how detrimental Mata was to our stability and wanted him out right from 2011 when he was the darling of the club. Also I let niggas know just how limited Ramires was right from time, even when Ramires was the darling of Chelsea. Not to blow my horn, but don't label all fans with the same brush. I've never been crazy about Hazard, though he's OK for me whilst I've been a superfan of KDB since 2013.

KDB epitomises what I like in a midfielder - first time passes, vision, straight making assists and goal attempts without taking too many touches. I don't like attacking midfielders who caress the ball too much before passing. He fits my profile perfectly. Call it the luck of having Bundesliga on ESPN back then, but I was well aware of his talents 3 years ago.

well, let me term it your opinion. You love his style of play doesn't mean he is beta than other players you don't like their style of play.
I know what hazard brings to the table when he plays.
Now i knw why u term iniesta "unproductive".

Dongorgon5:
For me, the following players should stay!!!
Courtois and Begovic
Terry(one year contract)
Zouma
Cahill( Squad player)
Matic(One season to see if he will regain his from)
Fabregas
Hazard(Our best player )
Willian
Pedro( A great proffessional, he was unlucky he sign for us at a bad time)
Costa( A fighter, could play his best football with us)
Azipilicueta
Baba Rahman( we should be patient with this guy)
The following player should leave before conte arrive
Mikel( Crappy Mikel)
Remy(Awful, not a chelsea calibre)
Pato(Emenalo greatest signing)
Falcao(Injury ruined him, china is waiting for you man)
Ivanovic
Oscar(Brazilain fraud)
This is my own list!!!
We need to sign 5 or 6 quality players

exactly what i ask for.

Sometimes, i am surprised by what i read here.
I remember in 2013 when KDB was fighting for a place in chelsea's team. Then, any one who dares to say that kdb is better than hazard will attacked by all chelsea fans. Then hazard was chelsea's messi, the fulcrum of all our attacking play. The player bold enough to drive through defences. I remember a commentator once saying "he has the key to all defenses". I also remember that kdb was started in our first three matches that season and he was busy trying the goal from outside the box without results.
Fast forward to 2016, hazard has lost form and kdb is playing well, someone is now saying that he has always regarded kdb as better than hazard. Look at human beings.

For the records, kdb is simply afraid of competition. That is why he ran away from chelsea. A player who has nt proven himself to the manager, yet he does nt want to stay on the bench.
I remember william starting from the bench when he first came to chelsea, bt look at how the story has changed. He has simply proven himself.

Let me ask, where was kdb when has was busy winning back to back player of the year in ligue 1?