₦airaland Forum

h

Adamna:
Hello

what's up

you can apply for urban and regional planning, surveying, quantity surveying, estate surveying in the environmental sciences

...

I rep the better by far University Unilorin

I rep Unilorin secondary school great USS

I would like to join I'm in kwara state

.

The University of Ilorin today 22nd of December, 2016 scrapped it's department of Criminology.
This was disclosed during a meeting with sudents of the department by representatives of the institution such as the HOD's, Dean, Sub-dean and others.
According to a source in the department who disclosed to Lade's signatory the reason why the department was scrapped. He said;

"What happened is that when we were admitted in 2014, NuC came for resource verification (accreditation) and the result was just released few weeks ago. So it was told that the dept didn't meet the required standard so it should be scraped"

"As a result of this they school authority tried to solve the problem so that students won't be left stranded.

"Initially they brought the suggestion that we should be moved to faculty of education but they see that there will be a future negative implication So that plan was jetissoned. Now they brought two options;


"No 1:

"We should be moved to sociology. How would they achieve this.

"As for 100 level students, they are going to be distributed to psychology, social work, geography and sociology but anyone who feels his utme combination fits economics he or she can go

"As for 200 and 300 level, all the soc core courses that should be studied in 100 and 200 level will be streamlined together and study them in 300 level as we are now *(100 level soc courses will be studied in 1st semester we are now while 200 level soc course will be studied in 2nd semester). As for 300 level soc courses we are going to study them during holidays (July to September 2017) instead of being at home we will be in sch studying ( special semester)

No 2:

"Inter-university transfer. If you are not pleased with the sch decision you can make transfer to where the is beeng studied like Unijos, UI, Unilag Lasu and other schools But the problem is
a) the financial constraints
b) it is very risky. once you decide to be transferred, the sch will get you the transcript and go to the school. Then, your studentship is terminated and if the sch you are willing to be transferred to reject you, you will be left with nothing (double loss)
C) as for 300 level who wish to move, the person will start from 200 level not 300 level I

"It was an heart breaking meeting, the Dean of the faculty, Hod of Pol science, psychology, sociology, faculty officer, faculty sub-dean, Mr obasanjo, mrs isiaka and Dr Adekeye were in attendance. Seriously they brainwashed us to extent that they (students) laughed and clapped for the authorities. Initially they were restive and angry, but after the brainwashing, they calm down".

nice concept it's time to take over

.

.

hello I'm New here

square pegs in round holes appointing all these old cargoes

square pegs in round holes

KAYD007:
Kogi state? Every house there get at least one or two Graves for their frontage...there wells must be filled with liquid from their deads..

something dey worry your head

rest in peace

henryadex:
whatever road you're going to embark on make sure you complete the Sango- ijoko to Berger road you have started then we can smile to you

na so jare
the road don turn swimming pool for some points

m

hi

.

The leadership of the All Progressives Congress (APC) might have resolved at the weekend to set up a disciplinary committee to look into the recalcitrant position of Hon. James Faleke, running mate to the late governorship candidate of the party in Kogi State, Alhaji Abubakar Audu, against the stand of the party on the state’s election. This is as Faleke has said his resolve to claim back his mandate as governor-elect was further energised after the continuous threat his life by some politicians, stating that he had reported the threats to the police and other security agencies though he was undeterred. A national officer of the APC, who hinted at the development and pleaded anonymity, said the party was pondering a five-man committee to query Faleke on why he decided to trample on party supremacy and embarrass it by “making a deliberate mess of the Kogi situation, despite all entreaties in collective interest”. Faleke had in the heat of the constitutional crisis occasioned by the death of Audu, insisted that he should be declared winner of the governorship election and in furtherance of his case, approached the courts for an intervention, which however is against the stand of the party. But the APC, following the constitutional impasse created by Audu’s death, had nominated Alhaji Yahaya Bello, the first runner up at the party’s primaries as its replacement for the December 5 supplementary election, which he (Bello) went on to win. But Faleke has not given up on his position, insisting Bello could not inherit the votes he and his late principal-to-be worked for. Against this backdrop, the APC, THISDAY gathered, had come up with a decision to make Faleke face a disciplinary committee as a way for the party to start asserting itself. The source said Faleke, by his disposition, greatly embarrassed the party and could not get away with it because he would have set a bad precedent. “His own nomination as running mate to Audu also created problems for the party because of how he came into the picture but the APC through its supremacy was able to prevail on other tendencies to let him have a smooth run. It is therefore a sign of sheer ingratitude to the party leadership for someone like him who has benefited from the magnanimity of the party leadership to seek to embarrass it", the source said. “The phrase ‘party supremacy’ is not going to exist only in the books; the time has come for us to put it to work. The unfortunate thing is that people, who had benefited immensely from the party at different capacities, are the ones wont to turn up such appalling attitude or disrespect the authorities. But that would have to stop. “We understand his right but constitutionally, that stops at the level of running mate for now. He cannot force anything and the party would not be blackmailed to submission, either in person or by proxy and that is why such disappointing and embarrassing insubordination would not be condoned. Those would be the issues the disciplinary committee would address when they eventually deploy to work,” the national officer of the party said. It is worthy of note that the chairman of the party, Chief John Odigie-Oyegun, had recently said Faleke was not indispensable, adding that the party would replace him, if he held on to his guns on the governorship seat. “On the Faleke issue, it is rather a straightforward and easy issue; we have replaced a governorship candidate. If the need arises and subject to what the law says, we will also get a deputy governorship candidate but we will cross those bridges as they arise but they have not arisen yet. As a political party, we simply understand the frustration that emanated from the death of Abubakar Audu. However, it is normal for us to accommodate the immediate reactions coming from the people involved. “Wielding the big stick in a situation like this might not be appropriate but there will be a time-line to it. Enough will be enough at a certain time…In the next few weeks depending on who goes to court or who doesn’t, we will know the boundaries of the law in respect of these issues. “As at now, we are very glad with the results that we have got and I’m very sure they would be upheld virtually in every tribunal whatsoever because we have adopted simple commonsense solution legally defensible. We cross every bridge as we get to it; we’ll wait and see who does what and work out answers that meet each situation. “We have thought the process through and we have won the election in Kogi. Those who feel aggrieved, it is for them to call to question whatever they feel aggrieved about and we are going to meet them on those grounds. For us in APC, Kogi is a settled issue; if you want to go to the tribunal, we’ll meet you there. If you want to go to court, we’ll meet you there,” he said. According to Faleke’s petition, "It has become necessary to bring this to the public knowledge over the continous threat to my life due to my stand not to compromise #Audu/Faleke mandate for anything. "I have to make this threat to my life public because of the loud silence from the security agencies even after sending petition to them." 'I have sent petition to the IG of Police and DG, DSS on the continuous threat to my life but no response till now' "The Lord is my shield & protector, he alone gives me courage and strength, I fear no one but Him. No weapon formed against me shall prosper" "No amount of intimidation and threat will make me give up the fight for justice and the legal struggle to reclaim #Audu/Faleke mandate. I will ensure that happen", he added. The leadership of the All Progressives Congress (APC) might have resolved at the weekend to set up a disciplinary committee to look into the recalcitrant position of Hon. James Faleke, running mate to the late governorship candidate of the party in Kogi State, Alhaji Abubakar Audu, against the stand of the party on the state’s election. This is as Faleke has said his resolve to claim back his mandate as governor-elect was further energised after the continuous threat his life by some politicians, stating that he had reported the threats to the police and other security agencies though he was undeterred. A national officer of the APC, who hinted at the development and pleaded anonymity, said the party was pondering a five-man committee to query Faleke on why he decided to trample on party supremacy and embarrass it by “making a deliberate mess of the Kogi situation, despite all entreaties in collective interest”. Faleke had in the heat of the constitutional crisis occasioned by the death of Audu, insisted that he should be declared winner of the governorship election and in furtherance of his case, approached the courts for an intervention, which however is against the stand of the party. But the APC, following the constitutional impasse created by Audu’s death, had nominated Alhaji Yahaya Bello, the first runner up at the party’s primaries as its replacement for the December 5 supplementary election, which he (Bello) went on to win. But Faleke has not given up on his position, insisting Bello could not inherit the votes he and his late principal-to-be worked for. Against this backdrop, the APC, THISDAY gathered, had come up with a decision to make Faleke face a disciplinary committee as a way for the party to start asserting itself. The source said Faleke, by his disposition, greatly embarrassed the party and could not get away with it because he would have set a bad precedent. “His own nomination as running mate to Audu also created problems for the party because of how he came into the picture but the APC through its supremacy was able to prevail on other tendencies to let him have a smooth run. It is therefore a sign of sheer ingratitude to the party leadership for someone like him who has benefited from the magnanimity of the party leadership to seek to embarrass it", the source said. “The phrase ‘party supremacy’ is not going to exist only in the books; the time has come for us to put it to work. The unfortunate thing is that people, who had benefited immensely from the party at different capacities, are the ones wont to turn up such appalling attitude or disrespect the authorities. But that would have to stop. “We understand his right but constitutionally, that stops at the level of running mate for now. He cannot force anything and the party would not be blackmailed to submission, either in person or by proxy and that is why such disappointing and embarrassing insubordination would not be condoned. Those would be the issues the disciplinary committee would address when they eventually deploy to work,” the national officer of the party said. It is worthy of note that the chairman of the party, Chief John Odigie-Oyegun, had recently said Faleke was not indispensable, adding that the party would replace him, if he held on to his guns on the governorship seat. “On the Faleke issue, it is rather a straightforward and easy issue; we have replaced a governorship candidate. If the need arises and subject to what the law says, we will also get a deputy governorship candidate but we will cross those bridges as they arise but they have not arisen yet. As a political party, we simply understand the frustration that emanated from the death of Abubakar Audu. However, it is normal for us to accommodate the immediate reactions coming from the people involved. “Wielding the big stick in a situation like this might not be appropriate but there will be a time-line to it. Enough will be enough at a certain time…In the next few weeks depending on who goes to court or who doesn’t, we will know the boundaries of the law in respect of these issues. “As at now, we are very glad with the results that we have got and I’m very sure they would be upheld virtually in every tribunal whatsoever because we have adopted simple commonsense solution legally defensible. We cross every bridge as we get to it; we’ll wait and see who does what and work out answers that meet each situation. “We have thought the process through and we have won the election in Kogi. Those who feel aggrieved, it is for them to call to question whatever they feel aggrieved about and we are going to meet them on those grounds. For us in APC, Kogi is a settled issue; if you want to go to the tribunal, we’ll meet you there. If you want to go to court, we’ll meet you there,” he said. According to Faleke’s petition, "It has become necessary to bring this to the public knowledge over the continous threat to my life due to my stand not to compromise #Audu/Faleke mandate for anything. "I have to make this threat to my life public because of the loud silence from the security agencies even after sending petition to them." 'I have sent petition to the IG of Police and DG, DSS on the continuous threat to my life but no response till now' "The Lord is my shield & protector, he alone gives me courage and strength, I fear no one but Him. No weapon formed against me shall prosper" "No amount of intimidation and threat will make me give up the fight for justice and the legal struggle to reclaim #Audu/Faleke mandate. I will ensure that happen", he added. The leadership of the All Progressives Congress (APC) might have resolved at the weekend to set up a disciplinary committee to look into the recalcitrant position of Hon. James Faleke, running mate to the late governorship candidate of the party in Kogi State, Alhaji Abubakar Audu, against the stand of the party on the state’s election. This is as Faleke has said his resolve to claim back his mandate as governor-elect was further energised after the continuous threat his life by some politicians, stating that he had reported the threats to the police and other security agencies though he was undeterred. A national officer of the APC, who hinted at the development and pleaded anonymity, said the party was pondering a five-man committee to query Faleke on why he decided to trample on party supremacy and embarrass it by “making a deliberate mess of the Kogi situation, despite all entreaties in collective interest”. Faleke had in the heat of the constitutional crisis occasioned by the death of Audu, insisted that he should be declared winner of the governorship election and in furtherance of his case, approached the courts for an intervention, which however is against the stand of the party. But the APC, following the constitutional impasse created by Audu’s death, had nominated Alhaji Yahaya Bello, the first runner up at the party’s primaries as its replacement for the December 5 supplementary election, which he (Bello) went on to win. But Faleke has not given up on his position, insisting Bello could not inherit the votes he and his late principal-to-be worked for. Against this backdrop, the APC, THISDAY gathered, had come up with a decision to make Faleke face a disciplinary committee as a way for the party to start asserting itself. The source said Faleke, by his disposition, greatly embarrassed the party and could not get away with it because he would have set a bad precedent. “His own nomination as running mate to Audu also created problems for the party because of how he came into the picture but the APC through its supremacy was able to prevail on other tendencies to let him have a smooth run. It is therefore a sign of sheer ingratitude to the party leadership for someone like him who has benefited from the magnanimity of the party leadership to seek to embarrass it", the source said. “The phrase ‘party supremacy’ is not going to exist only in the books; the time has come for us to put it to work. The unfortunate thing is that people, who had benefited immensely from the party at different capacities, are the ones wont to turn up such appalling attitude or disrespect the authorities. But that would have to stop. “We understand his right but constitutionally, that stops at the level of running mate for now. He cannot force anything and the party would not be blackmailed to submission, either in person or by proxy and that is why such disappointing and embarrassing insubordination would not be condoned. Those would be the issues the disciplinary committee would address when they eventually deploy to work,” the national officer of the party said. It is worthy of note that the chairman of the party, Chief John Odigie-Oyegun, had recently said Faleke was not indispensable, adding that the party would replace him, if he held on to his guns on the governorship seat. “On the Faleke issue, it is rather a straightforward and easy issue; we have replaced a governorship candidate. If the need arises and subject to what the law says, we will also get a deputy governorship candidate but we will cross those bridges as they arise but they have not arisen yet. As a political party, we simply understand the frustration that emanated from the death of Abubakar Audu. However, it is normal for us to accommodate the immediate reactions coming from the people involved. “Wielding the big stick in a situation like this might not be appropriate but there will be a time-line to it. Enough will be enough at a certain time…In the next few weeks depending on who goes to court or who doesn’t, we will know the boundaries of the law in respect of these issues. “As at now, we are very glad with the results that we have got and I’m very sure they would be upheld virtually in every tribunal whatsoever because we have adopted simple commonsense solution legally defensible. We cross every bridge as we get to it; we’ll wait and see who does what and work out answers that meet each situation. “We have thought the process through and we have won the election in Kogi. Those who feel aggrieved, it is for them to call to question whatever they feel aggrieved about and we are going to meet them on those grounds. For us in APC, Kogi is a settled issue; if you want to go to the tribunal, we’ll meet you there. If you want to go to court, we’ll meet you there,” he said. According to Faleke’s petition, "It has become necessary to bring this to the public knowledge over the continous threat to my life due to my stand not to compromise #Audu/Faleke mandate for anything. "I have to make this threat to my life public because of the loud silence from the security agencies even after sending petition to them." 'I have sent petition to the IG of Police and DG, DSS on the continuous threat to my life but no response till now' "The Lord is my shield & protector, he alone gives me courage and strength, I fear no one but Him. No weapon formed against me shall prosper" "No amount of intimidation and threat will make me give up the fight for justice and the legal struggle to reclaim #Audu/Faleke mandate. I will ensure that happen", he added.

the great okun people