₦airaland Forum

Desyner:
Job 42:10 God restored Job after he prayed for his friends. Stop typing what's beyond your lean mind. If the church is suppose to embrace poverty why are you using the poor in the church to justify your criticism of those who aren't suppose to be rich.

you missed my point!

9jaArea:
If God hated masturbation he won't create man with long hands

lol so it's God's fault now


did God also make libidos and sex dolls

teekay213:
1.That's why women don't ovulate everyday.

2.was the hand made for stroking the penis till it ejaculate?

dude and it is written 2 shall become 1 one flesh. even paul said your bodies belong to each other. so servicing one's own body is in no way immoral right?


cc sirkelvin

teekay213:
pls can you show me how animals masturbate?
Who created sex?
I'm always ready to learn.

i am not an animal now, go to youtube to show you

who created or started sex? women started sex

bovo:
You obviously haven't spent much time with your bible. Lev 15:16, 1 Cor 6:12. Thank me later.

naoslay pls don't mind this lad, read lev 15:16-18. DONT STOP AT 16

RealGucci:
in ja rules voice If God be one of us one of us would he sin and love to lie ai wanna kno of God be one of us one of us wud he use his name in vain i nidda kno

in dmx's voice sharrap bro turn to the scrolls Jesus is God and was on earth 2000years ago

Kennitrust:
and "replenish" mean... Cultivating or taking care of the earth by the two people that {must have) existence by then.







I think, we're interpreting the Bible beyond (even) God imagination.





Now the fall of man is linked likely to s*x.



Funny

if we were not going to die do we need offsprings?

omooba969:
@bolded,

Can you please shed light on the "operation hit her on the head..."?

More so, @animals masturbating, you'd be shocked at what you'd find on YouTube.

i was just telling the guy sef but that "operation hit her on the head" just bust my head




that flimestones cartoon

doingood:
So if ur wife is far from u and u feel sex gr8ly that u can not bear. Is it advisably to use olosho or self-service?
My dear, jerking off is not a sin. It only take u out from committing sin. If not for the invention of masturbation, the world would have been worst in terms of sexual immorality

only if david had jerked off




he wouldn't have killed a man and provoke God's anger against his household

yeman1:
it's true...
it's true... by fire by force he he he !!!
don't u see how cock use to chase hen like say wetin ??

have you seen cocks on heat without hens they can mount on anything and do their dance

yeman1:
please can you show me where you saw the word masturbation in the Bible ?
I'm living in another state far to my wife... sometimes when I feel like having sex and my wife is not around...and I can't because of that go outside there and look for olosho or any girls out there. The moment I hold my dick with cream then after some few minutes I cum. and my body is calm. I don't even feel like seeing any woman bcoz I'm not interested due to what I just did.
so if not masturbation, what must I do ? hmm? ignorant ppl hiding behind the scripture as if they were there when God created Adam.

speak in tongues for 5hours or say hail mary for 10hours pick the one like

SarcasticMe:
Can you masturbate without creating images of a sexual partner in your head? Anyway, it is lust after the flesh, so it is bad.

can you get married to a woman without skin or face?

Ekejoestar:
MASTURBATION is a SIN that ENTANGLES the human SOUL and when people try to break off from that entanglement by the own power and fail woefully, then they become relaxed and tag it 'NOT A SIN'. Most people who masturbate also watch porn and they are also addicted to porn. Breaking the entanglement of masturbation is a gradual process that must be done in the Power of the Holy Spirit and in the prayer room. God will help you.

what about looking at a woman 'lustfully' does the power of the Holy Ghost prevent a human from having sexual orges

PietraK:
Masturbation is not a sin.

There is no bible verse that calls it a sin. That people chose to be guilty after doing it does not make it a sin. We must all understand the meaning of sin.

Where there is no law, there is no sin. God did not give any law against Masturbation.

Maybe it has its negative effects but so does sugar. Sugar does a lot of damage to the body but that doesn't make consumption of sugar a sin.

masturbation is a sin, simple and short. especially when a man or a woman uses it to deprive their spouse from sex (without both agreeing to such deprivation)

it's even worse when one is an addict to it.

glutony is a sin, like greed is a sin

Nnemuka:
There's a demon behind masturbation.
For women, you'll become aggressive and attract the spirit of incubus/sucubus. Strange men and women will continue to have sexual intercourse in the dream with you. It can hinder spiritual growth and your dream life will become zero.

For men, opens doors for spiritual wife to torment you and consistent sex in the dream if care is not taken. It could lead to delay in marriage, Reasons why some of you are 45 and still single.
Secondly you become unapproachable and aggressive too, no woman will ever appeal to you and the zeal to make any relationships work becomes a difficult task for you. etc
Go for deliverance and be saved as i have been saved.

ps how many men and women that masturbate have you interviewed before you drew your conclusion about demons.

as if people don't end up marry demons as spouses

AishaBuhari:
Sex outside marriage is a sin be it mastubation etc...

so is masturbating one's wife a special sin, going down between her legs with a tongue is it even a far worse sin


tell me lemme know

Dottore:
I don't know why many people loose their sleep because someone chose to self service. It's my organ not yours.

Ladies hate guys that masturbate with passion the reason is not far fetched:

They can't use sex as a weapon to manipulate you into doing their bid.

You can't contract STDs

I've never patronized Prostitutes.

I hav full control when I'm with the opposite sex. If you behave we fvck if u don't I maintain without gushing over your body no matter how sexually attractive you may think you are. There are lots of more beautiful women in porn sites.

Those that say the disadvantage is low performance when with a woman you better go check yourself because you have issues maybe from an infection. I don't. My dick responds whenever I feel like whether with the opposite sex or on self service.

I don't cum quick during sex because of mastery of control of urges...

the problem is you could emotionaless to the opposite sex, like they are not needed

teekay213:
I always think about it also cos it's not easy to hold body.

I think God created sex mainly for re-procreation and added pleasure so that humans will always love to engage.

And I think he created man specially with muscles,power and so much sex drive to over power any woman who does not to have sex,so that humans will not be extinct,look at animals for example and Think of the stone age "operation hit her on the head and carry her to your house.

I think God hate masturbation,the purpose of sperm is not for waste but to meet an egg.

That's why he created everything with his mate,he even created the females more so they can go round and remain so there wouldn't be fight.

Have you seen an animal masturbated before?

operation hit and carry now it is touch and follow

God did not create sex, and animals do masturbate.

abiodunalasa:
Even it is disgusting to some of us humans... Needless to mention God almighty.

i wonder what you would call somethings done during sex

Kennitrust:
how did man intend to multiply because before the fall of man, God said, "BE FRUITFUL".


Could that multiplication come by creating other people or by procreation.

even Jesus said be fruitful, any tear that does not bear fruit will be cut down.

the key word in that genesis is replenish the earth. how does procreating replenish the earth?

God did make man come out of mary didn't he?

and who is to say that man's fall was not in God's plan

if conte wants to start on a front foot, play fast pace football and hope his defenders can recover lose ball. then my formation would be 3-4-3 and my line up would be azi, chris, RUDIGER; moses, kante, drinkwater, alonso; WILLIAM, MORATA, hazard.

i won't start cahill, fabregas and giroud if i were to play fast pace football, with ball to ground, quick passes and fewer long balls and crosses. william can bring what fabregas being less defensive but more pacy.

like i said playing this against barca is a big risk, it could be a liverpool risk.

3 goals in tuesday's game but be sure of conceeding, not something you want to do at home a better approach playing away. on tuesday chelsea should do their best not to conceed a goal and give barca any form of control in the game.

cc lordfalcao

lordfalcao:
giroud is too slow for that game, you spoiled your analysis with the giroud inclusion

1. has morata fully recovered?
2. is morata in a better form and moral than giroud now?
3. is morata match fit? is such a high profile good for him to return in?
4. morata can come in later on.

about giroud's lack of pace, this is not the barca you can do fast counter attack on. does barca hold a high defence high? if yes then morata should start.

they play a double 6 when defending and close space quickly. but with long balls, giroud can battle it and bring others into play. giroud is good as morata in quick one two's.

i want morata the real morata to start ahead of giroud. morata can start united game, city game and the return leg.

giroud has built momentum, likely has more confidence right now. i don't think any chelsea fan would have benched drogba for lack of pace. i like morata but...

FOR THIS TUESDAY MATCH I PICK GIROUD

iamoyindamola:
you can't start giroud alone against big team, it's will be a massacre
This coming from an arsenal fan

i started 10 other players along with him now

you guys writing your formations should consider that barca will play 4-4-2 diamond. the midfield will be thick

suarez 9
messi 10 (free role between ss and am)
iniesta LCM/AM, rakitic RCM, paulinho AM/CM, busquets DM (who can drop deep like a CB and still push up like a CM when either rakitic, paulinho or iniesta burst into the box to create or to score)

at the back: alba lb and semedo/roberto rb (will run the flanks and spread play) leaving pique and umiti cb.

conte should go with a 3-5-2 not to win the midfield battle but limit the space for barca midfielders. 3-4-3 could be use to win the game when the match has become less risky even though losing the midfield.

except conte plans to start on a front foot going with 343 is risky if chelsea doesn't score and start winning early in the game

a midfield trio will give chelsea a bit of control. who does conte trust more a front trio or a midfield tro? for me a 352 azi, chris, cahill; moses, dw, kante, fab, alonso; hazard, giroud. subs morata, willy & pedro

pamcode:
Exactly 3 at the back against Barca would be suicide. More so it seems we are poor at marking and tackling there are times I feel we can't Just get near the opposition.
My line up would be a 4-3-1-2 formation:

Azpi----------Rudiger-----------Christensen--------Alonso

Drinkwater------------Fabregas-----------Kante

----------Hazard---------------

Morata-------------------Giroud

when chelsea defend alonso tracks back even moses goes back to make it 5 at the back. formation changes during the games its not static from start to finish.

conte will not start both giroud and morata this is not the game to start an experiment. maybe later on.

Obere4u:
Courtious
Azi Christen Rud/Cahil
Moses kante Fab Danny Alonso
Hazard morata

OR

Azi Chris Rud/Cahil
Moses Kante Fab Alonso
Morata Hazard
Giroud

OR

Azi Chris Rud/Cahil
Moses Kante Fab Alonso
William Hazard
Morata

First formation is to go deeper and feed on fast counter
Second formation is for Giroud to hold up ball for quick link up play.
Third formation is for for ball retention and quick transition from defence to attack.

conte won't start the game with option 2. option 3 is good but william might not start and conte doesn't play use 343 against top teams 'this season' much except he wants to surprise barca.

option 1 is would be cause barca will have bodies in the midfield and try controlling the game from the midfield. pedro and william can come in later

is morata fit enough to start? he can still start against united on saturday. Giroud should start instead

Griffon:
4-5-1:

Courtois

Azpilicueta Christensen Luiz Alonso

Moses Kante Fabregas Drinkwater Hazard

Morata

i for 1 know this is a 3-5-2 disguised as a 4-5-1

considering barca will likely play 4-4-2 diamond, 3 in the middle for chelsea could balance the midfield battle.

but luiz is out injured, most likely cahill or rudiger

Griffon:
Emenalo left in November for apparently being fed up of mediating between Conte and Marina. That's the news on the street.

As it stands, we don't expect the board to appoint a new TD anytime soon. It's either Conte leaves or Marina leaves. Put it this way, in a straight fight between Conte and Marina, there will be one winner.

Until that happens, we are sure to see inane acquisitions until normalcy is restored.

Marina the power of that woman

Afoife in conclusion to what Hier is saying is sex is sin and God did not create sex or sin.

any form of sex is sin simple

^^^^^

1 john 1:8 no man without sin

james 1:15 sin brings death

psalm 51:5 in sin are men born

hebrews 9:27 all men die

cc tdayoff

and humans without God's command lived in peace and harmony

cc tartar9
you are really a baby

like as if buying shares is not risky, anyway lottery, betting, gambling usually draws a spirit of greed to some (who would have been greedy anyway) but to others a game of luck, lessure activity (they have no hope in it).

remember in the bible it says 'time' and 'chance' happen to all who succeed. it might just be your time and your chance.