Jerrynet's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Jerrynet's Profile › Jerrynet's Posts
Newsgeek24:ALLEGATIONS OF VICTIMISATION OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS IN RIVERS STATE There is growing tension and unrest in Rivers State secondary schools following reports that some Principals, Vice Principals, Head Teachers, and their Deputies are being victimised or punished for allegedly supporting former Governor Nyesom Wike. According to reports, several Principals perceived to be loyal to Wike have been transferred to schools with poor and unconducive working conditions, while others have reportedly been removed from their administrative positions and redeployed to classroom teaching duties after serving for many years as Principals or Vice Principals. A source within the Rivers State Universal Basic Education Board (RSUBEB) alleged that officials were instructed to use any available excuse to demote or redeploy school administrators believed to be loyal to the former governor. This development has generated widespread concern within the education sector, with many stakeholders describing the situation as unprecedented and destabilising. A retired board official who also expressed concern over the development described the action as wrong and harmful to the education system. According to him, it is improper for the Board to remove a duly appointed Principal or Vice Principal and replace them with a staff member from the same school merely because the staff member is senior by grade level, while demoting the former administrator to a classroom teacher. He warned that if such a practice is allowed to stand, it would set a dangerous precedent whereby any school head could be removed simply because a higher-grade officer is transferred into the school. “It would mean that whenever a teacher senior in grade level is posted to a school, the existing head must vacate office and return to the classroom. This will drastically demoralise school heads and make the entire system unstable,” he said. The retired official further noted that the issue may not necessarily be political, but rather lies in the way the new board members and directors are handling the matter. He emphasized that school heads and their deputies are not appointed solely based on grade-level seniority, but on competence, qualifications, and professional training — particularly in education management. He questioned the rationale behind appointing individuals who never formally studied education to head schools, noting that some of them were converted from clerical positions, while others were employed without education qualifications or only obtained a Postgraduate Diploma in Education (PGDE). “How do you overlook someone who actually studied education and education management, and appoint someone who does not even know how to write a proper lesson note, let alone inspect teachers’ lesson notes?” he asked. Recalling past standards, he said that during the tenure of Ven. Fyneface Akah and his predecessors, the criteria for appointing school heads — consistent with global best practices — were competence and qualifications. According to him, this approach contributed significantly to the stability and achievements recorded in the school system during that period. Another source at the Ministry of Education, who spoke on condition of anonymity, suggested that the situation could be handled more professionally without creating unrest. He explained that the standard practice worldwide, where seniority becomes an issue, is to transfer the officer senior in grade level to a school where the head is already senior, while junior officers are posted to schools where vacancies exist, thereby balancing seniority without humiliating or demoting existing heads. He also noted that with the governor’s approval for the immediate deployment of the recently recruited 1,000 teachers, such teachers could be posted to schools where Principals, Vice Principals, or Head Teachers are lower in grade level. According to him, this would prevent unnecessary tension and avoid heating up the already fragile polity. Meanwhile, a teacher from a secondary school in Port Harcourt has appealed to the Nigerian Union of Teachers (NUT) to intervene and prevail on Governor Siminalayi Fubara to reverse the alleged directive. The teacher stressed that not all affected administrators are political loyalists, adding that many are career civil servants who have served diligently without violating any civil service rules. Further investigations revealed that the Board allegedly relied on questionable grade - level justifications to demote some school heads. A source at the Board described the action as improper and contrary to established civil service procedures, noting that it is wrong to remove a duly appointed administrator who has not been found guilty of any misconduct. In view of these developments, stakeholders are calling on Governor Siminalayi Fubara to urgently look into the matter. Reports indicate that several affected administrators have refused to vacate their offices or hand over, insisting that due process must be followed and that the integrity of the education system must be protected. |
Raenae:Just make anyone you know at the Board or find out from School heads at the UBE Secondary schools |
press9jatv:ALLEGATIONS OF VICTIMISATION OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS IN RIVERS STATE There is growing tension and unrest in Rivers State secondary schools following reports that some Principals, Vice Principals, Head Teachers, and their Deputies are being punished for allegedly supporting former Governor Nyesom Wike. According to reports, several Principals perceived to be loyal to Wike have been transferred to schools with poor and unconducive working conditions, while others have reportedly been removed from their administrative positions and redeployed to classroom teaching duties after serving for many years as Principals or Vice Principals. A source within the Rivers State Universal Basic Education Board (RSUBEB) alleged that officials were instructed to use any available excuse to demote or redeploy school administrators believed to be loyal to Wike. This development has generated widespread concern within the education sector. One teacher from a secondary school in Port Harcourt appealed to the Nigerian Union of Teachers (NUT) to intervene and prevail on Governor Siminalayi Fubara to reverse the alleged directive. The teacher emphasized that not all affected administrators are political loyalists, stressing that many of them are career civil servants who have faithfully carried out their duties without violating any civil service rules. Further investigations revealed that the Board allegedly relied on questionable grade-level justifications to demote some school heads. A source at the Board described the action as improper and contrary to civil service procedures, noting that it is wrong to remove a duly appointed school head or vice principal who has not been found guilty of any misconduct or breach of civil service regulations. The source further questioned the rationale of asking a school administrator to vacate office and return to classroom teaching solely on the grounds that there are teachers senior in rank within the same school, despite the individual having been formally appointed to the position. In view of these developments, stakeholders are calling on Governor Siminalayi Fubara to urgently look into the matter. Reports indicate that several affected administrators have refused to vacate their offices or hand over, insisting that due process must be followed. |
press9jatv:ALLEGATIONS OF VICTIMISATION OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS IN RIVERS STATE There is growing tension and unrest in Rivers State secondary schools following reports that some Principals, Vice Principals, Head Teachers, and their Deputies are being punished for allegedly supporting former Governor Nyesom Wike. According to reports, several Principals perceived to be loyal to Wike have been transferred to schools with poor and unconducive working conditions, while others have reportedly been removed from their administrative positions and redeployed to classroom teaching duties after serving for many years as Principals or Vice Principals. A source within the Rivers State Universal Basic Education Board (RSUBEB) alleged that officials were instructed to use any available excuse to demote or redeploy school administrators believed to be loyal to Wike. This development has generated widespread concern within the education sector. One teacher from a secondary school in Port Harcourt appealed to the Nigerian Union of Teachers (NUT) to intervene and prevail on Governor Siminalayi Fubara to reverse the alleged directive. The teacher emphasized that not all affected administrators are political loyalists, stressing that many of them are career civil servants who have faithfully carried out their duties without violating any civil service rules. Further investigations revealed that the Board allegedly relied on questionable grade-level justifications to demote some school heads. A source at the Board described the action as improper and contrary to civil service procedures, noting that it is wrong to remove a duly appointed school head or vice principal who has not been found guilty of any misconduct or breach of civil service regulations. The source further questioned the rationale of asking a school administrator to vacate office and return to classroom teaching solely on the grounds that there are teachers senior in rank within the same school, despite the individual having been formally appointed to the position. In view of these developments, stakeholders are calling on Governor Siminalayi Fubara to urgently look into the matter. Reports indicate that several affected administrators have refused to vacate their offices or hand over, insisting that due process must be followed. |
emekatex:ALLEGATIONS OF VICTIMISATION OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS IN RIVERS STATE There is growing tension and unrest in Rivers State secondary schools following reports that some Principals, Vice Principals, Head Teachers, and their Deputies are being punished for allegedly supporting former Governor Nyesom Wike. According to reports, several Principals perceived to be loyal to Wike have been transferred to schools with poor and unconducive working conditions, while others have reportedly been removed from their administrative positions and redeployed to classroom teaching duties after serving for many years as Principals or Vice Principals. A source within the Rivers State Universal Basic Education Board (RSUBEB) alleged that officials were instructed to use any available excuse to demote or redeploy school administrators believed to be loyal to Wike. This development has generated widespread concern within the education sector. One teacher from a secondary school in Port Harcourt appealed to the Nigerian Union of Teachers (NUT) to intervene and prevail on Governor Siminalayi Fubara to reverse the alleged directive. The teacher emphasized that not all affected administrators are political loyalists, stressing that many of them are career civil servants who have faithfully carried out their duties without violating any civil service rules. Further investigations revealed that the Board allegedly relied on questionable grade-level justifications to demote some school heads. A source at the Board described the action as improper and contrary to civil service procedures, noting that it is wrong to remove a duly appointed school head or vice principal who has not been found guilty of any misconduct or breach of civil service regulations. The source further questioned the rationale of asking a school administrator to vacate office and return to classroom teaching solely on the grounds that there are teachers senior in rank within the same school, despite the individual having been formally appointed to the position. In view of these developments, stakeholders are calling on Governor Siminalayi Fubara to urgently look into the matter. Reports indicate that several affected administrators have refused to vacate their offices or hand over, insisting that due process must be followed. |
BenUmor:ALLEGATIONS OF VICTIMISATION OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS IN RIVERS STATE There is growing tension and unrest in Rivers State secondary schools following reports that some Principals, Vice Principals, Head Teachers, and their Deputies are being punished for allegedly supporting former Governor Nyesom Wike. According to reports, several Principals perceived to be loyal to Wike have been transferred to schools with poor and unconducive working conditions, while others have reportedly been removed from their administrative positions and redeployed to classroom teaching duties after serving for many years as Principals or Vice Principals. A source within the Rivers State Universal Basic Education Board (RSUBEB) alleged that officials were instructed to use any available excuse to demote or redeploy school administrators believed to be loyal to Wike. This development has generated widespread concern within the education sector. One teacher from a secondary school in Port Harcourt appealed to the Nigerian Union of Teachers (NUT) to intervene and prevail on Governor Siminalayi Fubara to reverse the alleged directive. The teacher emphasized that not all affected administrators are political loyalists, stressing that many of them are career civil servants who have faithfully carried out their duties without violating any civil service rules. Further investigations revealed that the Board allegedly relied on questionable grade-level justifications to demote some school heads. A source at the Board described the action as improper and contrary to civil service procedures, noting that it is wrong to remove a duly appointed school head or vice principal who has not been found guilty of any misconduct or breach of civil service regulations. The source further questioned the rationale of asking a school administrator to vacate office and return to classroom teaching solely on the grounds that there are teachers senior in rank within the same school, despite the individual having been formally appointed to the position. In view of these developments, stakeholders are calling on Governor Siminalayi Fubara to urgently look into the matter. Reports indicate that several affected administrators have refused to vacate their offices or hand over, insisting that due process must be followed. |
Raenae:ALLEGATIONS OF VICTIMISATION OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS IN RIVERS STATE There is growing tension and unrest in Rivers State secondary schools following reports that some Principals, Vice Principals, Head Teachers, and their Deputies are being punished for allegedly supporting former Governor Nyesom Wike. According to reports, several Principals perceived to be loyal to Wike have been transferred to schools with poor and unconducive working conditions, while others have reportedly been removed from their administrative positions and redeployed to classroom teaching duties after serving for many years as Principals or Vice Principals. A source within the Rivers State Universal Basic Education Board (RSUBEB) alleged that officials were instructed to use any available excuse to demote or redeploy school administrators believed to be loyal to Wike. This development has generated widespread concern within the education sector. One teacher from a secondary school in Port Harcourt appealed to the Nigerian Union of Teachers (NUT) to intervene and prevail on Governor Siminalayi Fubara to reverse the alleged directive. The teacher emphasized that not all affected administrators are political loyalists, stressing that many of them are career civil servants who have faithfully carried out their duties without violating any civil service rules. Further investigations revealed that the Board allegedly relied on questionable grade-level justifications to demote some school heads. A source at the Board described the action as improper and contrary to civil service procedures, noting that it is wrong to remove a duly appointed school head or vice principal who has not been found guilty of any misconduct or breach of civil service regulations. The source further questioned the rationale of asking a school administrator to vacate office and return to classroom teaching solely on the grounds that there are teachers senior in rank within the same school, despite the individual having been formally appointed to the position. In view of these developments, stakeholders are calling on Governor Siminalayi Fubara to urgently look into the matter. Reports indicate that several affected administrators have refused to vacate their offices or hand over, insisting that due process must be followed. |
BenUmor:ALLEGATIONS OF VICTIMISATION OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS IN RIVERS STATE There is growing tension and unrest in Rivers State secondary schools following reports that some Principals, Vice Principals, Head Teachers, and their Deputies are being punished for allegedly supporting former Governor Nyesom Wike. According to reports, several Principals perceived to be loyal to Wike have been transferred to schools with poor and unconducive working conditions, while others have reportedly been removed from their administrative positions and redeployed to classroom teaching duties after serving for many years as Principals or Vice Principals. A source within the Rivers State Universal Basic Education Board (RSUBEB) alleged that officials were instructed to use any available excuse to demote or redeploy school administrators believed to be loyal to Wike. This development has generated widespread concern within the education sector. One teacher from a secondary school in Port Harcourt appealed to the Nigerian Union of Teachers (NUT) to intervene and prevail on Governor Siminalayi Fubara to reverse the alleged directive. The teacher emphasized that not all affected administrators are political loyalists, stressing that many of them are career civil servants who have faithfully carried out their duties without violating any civil service rules. Further investigations revealed that the Board allegedly relied on questionable grade-level justifications to demote some school heads. A source at the Board described the action as improper and contrary to civil service procedures, noting that it is wrong to remove a duly appointed school head or vice principal who has not been found guilty of any misconduct or breach of civil service regulations. The source further questioned the rationale of asking a school administrator to vacate office and return to classroom teaching solely on the grounds that there are teachers senior in rank within the same school, despite the individual having been formally appointed to the position. In view of these developments, stakeholders are calling on Governor Siminalayi Fubara to urgently look into the matter. Reports indicate that several affected administrators have refused to vacate their offices or hand over, insisting that due process must be followed. |
CyynthiaKiss:ALLEGATIONS OF VICTIMISATION OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS IN RIVERS STATE There is growing tension and unrest in Rivers State secondary schools following reports that some Principals, Vice Principals, Head Teachers, and their Deputies are being punished for allegedly supporting former Governor Nyesom Wike. According to reports, several Principals perceived to be loyal to Wike have been transferred to schools with poor and unconducive working conditions, while others have reportedly been removed from their administrative positions and redeployed to classroom teaching duties after serving for many years as Principals or Vice Principals. A source within the Rivers State Universal Basic Education Board (RSUBEB) alleged that officials were instructed to use any available excuse to demote or redeploy school administrators believed to be loyal to Wike. This development has generated widespread concern within the education sector. One teacher from a secondary school in Port Harcourt appealed to the Nigerian Union of Teachers (NUT) to intervene and prevail on Governor Siminalayi Fubara to reverse the alleged directive. The teacher emphasized that not all affected administrators are political loyalists, stressing that many of them are career civil servants who have faithfully carried out their duties without violating any civil service rules. Further investigations revealed that the Board allegedly relied on questionable grade-level justifications to demote some school heads. A source at the Board described the action as improper and contrary to civil service procedures, noting that it is wrong to remove a duly appointed school head or vice principal who has not been found guilty of any misconduct or breach of civil service regulations. The source further questioned the rationale of asking a school administrator to vacate office and return to classroom teaching solely on the grounds that there are teachers senior in rank within the same school, despite the individual having been formally appointed to the position. In view of these developments, stakeholders are calling on Governor Siminalayi Fubara to urgently look into the matter. Reports indicate that several affected administrators have refused to vacate their offices or hand over, insisting that due process must be followed. |
ogododo:ALLEGATIONS OF VICTIMISATION OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS IN RIVERS STATE There is growing tension and unrest in Rivers State secondary schools following reports that some Principals, Vice Principals, Head Teachers, and their Deputies are being punished for allegedly supporting former Governor Nyesom Wike. According to reports, several Principals perceived to be loyal to Wike have been transferred to schools with poor and unconducive working conditions, while others have reportedly been removed from their administrative positions and redeployed to classroom teaching duties after serving for many years as Principals or Vice Principals. A source within the Rivers State Universal Basic Education Board (RSUBEB) alleged that officials were instructed to use any available excuse to demote or redeploy school administrators believed to be loyal to Wike. This development has generated widespread concern within the education sector. One teacher from a secondary school in Port Harcourt appealed to the Nigerian Union of Teachers (NUT) to intervene and prevail on Governor Siminalayi Fubara to reverse the alleged directive. The teacher emphasized that not all affected administrators are political loyalists, stressing that many of them are career civil servants who have faithfully carried out their duties without violating any civil service rules. Further investigations revealed that the Board allegedly relied on questionable grade-level justifications to demote some school heads. A source at the Board described the action as improper and contrary to civil service procedures, noting that it is wrong to remove a duly appointed school head or vice principal who has not been found guilty of any misconduct or breach of civil service regulations. The source further questioned the rationale of asking a school administrator to vacate office and return to classroom teaching solely on the grounds that there are teachers senior in rank within the same school, despite the individual having been formally appointed to the position. In view of these developments, stakeholders are calling on Governor Siminalayi Fubara to urgently look into the matter. Reports indicate that several affected administrators have refused to vacate their offices or hand over, insisting that due process must be followed. |
Omooba77:ALLEGATIONS OF VICTIMISATION OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS IN RIVERS STATE There is growing tension and unrest in Rivers State secondary schools following reports that some Principals, Vice Principals, Head Teachers, and their Deputies are being punished for allegedly supporting former Governor Nyesom Wike. According to reports, several Principals perceived to be loyal to Wike have been transferred to schools with poor and unconducive working conditions, while others have reportedly been removed from their administrative positions and redeployed to classroom teaching duties after serving for many years as Principals or Vice Principals. A source within the Rivers State Universal Basic Education Board (RSUBEB) alleged that officials were instructed to use any available excuse to demote or redeploy school administrators believed to be loyal to Wike. This development has generated widespread concern within the education sector. One teacher from a secondary school in Port Harcourt appealed to the Nigerian Union of Teachers (NUT) to intervene and prevail on Governor Siminalayi Fubara to reverse the alleged directive. The teacher emphasized that not all affected administrators are political loyalists, stressing that many of them are career civil servants who have faithfully carried out their duties without violating any civil service rules. Further investigations revealed that the Board allegedly relied on questionable grade-level justifications to demote some school heads. A source at the Board described the action as improper and contrary to civil service procedures, noting that it is wrong to remove a duly appointed school head or vice principal who has not been found guilty of any misconduct or breach of civil service regulations. The source further questioned the rationale of asking a school administrator to vacate office and return to classroom teaching solely on the grounds that there are teachers senior in rank within the same school, despite the individual having been formally appointed to the position. In view of these developments, stakeholders are calling on Governor Siminalayi Fubara to urgently look into the matter. Reports indicate that several affected administrators have refused to vacate their offices or hand over, insisting that due process must be followed. |
OLAADEGBU:ALLEGATIONS OF VICTIMISATION OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS IN RIVERS STATE There is growing tension and unrest in Rivers State secondary schools following reports that some Principals, Vice Principals, Head Teachers, and their Deputies are being punished for allegedly supporting former Governor Nyesom Wike. According to reports, several Principals perceived to be loyal to Wike have been transferred to schools with poor and unconducive working conditions, while others have reportedly been removed from their administrative positions and redeployed to classroom teaching duties after serving for many years as Principals or Vice Principals. A source within the Rivers State Universal Basic Education Board (RSUBEB) alleged that officials were instructed to use any available excuse to demote or redeploy school administrators believed to be loyal to Wike. This development has generated widespread concern within the education sector. One teacher from a secondary school in Port Harcourt appealed to the Nigerian Union of Teachers (NUT) to intervene and prevail on Governor Siminalayi Fubara to reverse the alleged directive. The teacher emphasized that not all affected administrators are political loyalists, stressing that many of them are career civil servants who have faithfully carried out their duties without violating any civil service rules. Further investigations revealed that the Board allegedly relied on questionable grade-level justifications to demote some school heads. A source at the Board described the action as improper and contrary to civil service procedures, noting that it is wrong to remove a duly appointed school head or vice principal who has not been found guilty of any misconduct or breach of civil service regulations. The source further questioned the rationale of asking a school administrator to vacate office and return to classroom teaching solely on the grounds that there are teachers senior in rank within the same school, despite the individual having been formally appointed to the position. In view of these developments, stakeholders are calling on Governor Siminalayi Fubara to urgently look into the matter. Reports indicate that several affected administrators have refused to vacate their offices or hand over, insisting that due process must be followed. |
ALLEGATIONS OF VICTIMISATION OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS IN RIVERS STATE There is growing tension and unrest in Rivers State secondary schools following reports that some Principals, Vice Principals, Head Teachers, and their Deputies are being punished for allegedly supporting former Governor Nyesom Wike. According to reports, several Principals perceived to be loyal to Wike have been transferred to schools with poor and unconducive working conditions, while others have reportedly been removed from their administrative positions and redeployed to classroom teaching duties after serving for many years as Principals or Vice Principals. A source within the Rivers State Universal Basic Education Board (RSUBEB) alleged that officials were instructed to use any available excuse to demote or redeploy school administrators believed to be loyal to Wike. This development has generated widespread concern within the education sector. One teacher from a secondary school in Port Harcourt appealed to the Nigerian Union of Teachers (NUT) to intervene and prevail on Governor Siminalayi Fubara to reverse the alleged directive. The teacher emphasized that not all affected administrators are political loyalists, stressing that many of them are career civil servants who have faithfully carried out their duties without violating any civil service rules. Further investigations revealed that the Board allegedly relied on questionable grade-level justifications to demote some school heads. A source at the Board described the action as improper and contrary to civil service procedures, noting that it is wrong to remove a duly appointed school head or vice principal who has not been found guilty of any misconduct or breach of civil service regulations. The source further questioned the rationale of asking a school administrator to vacate office and return to classroom teaching solely on the grounds that there are teachers senior in rank within the same school, despite the individual having been formally appointed to the position. In view of these developments, stakeholders are calling on Governor Siminalayi Fubara to urgently look into the matter. Reports indicate that several affected administrators have refused to vacate their offices or hand over, insisting that due process must be followed. |
Racoon:While the ADC to Former President Jonathan was recently promoted to the same office after he served the then President for five years and also still serving the country after the exist of his former boss. Tinubu is just a disaster who never care about the feelins of others. He has mo regards for protocols and laid down rules |
seunmsg:My take goes with a another question: After writing exam in a programme of five years and 40% percent of the students failed. What will the system gain for failing the students? |
A CALL FOR CLARITY AND CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION: The Rivers State Case Before the Supreme Court I am not a politician, and I have no intention of becoming one at this time - even though I studied Political Science and was actively involved in student politics, at some point, contested and won an election on campus, which led to my emergence as the Speaker of the Students' Union Government Parliament. My decision not to enter politics is not because I am a clergyman or that it is somehow sinful. No. Politics, in itself, is not a sin. As members of society, we are all inevitably affected by political decisions made through the mechanisms of governance, particularly within the framework of the Social Contract Theory. However, my personal decision to avoid politics is based on the unfortunate reality of our present political climate - one that has been marred by partisanship, manipulation, and a troubling lack of accountability. That said, my interest in this matter stems not from partisan loyalty, but from a genuine concern for constitutional order and the future of democratic governance in Nigeria. On March 18, 2025, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu declared a six-month State of Emergency in Rivers State under Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution, suspending the elected Governor, Deputy Governor, and all Members of the State Assembly. He appointed Retired Vice Admiral Ibokette Ibas as the Sole Administrator. In response, seven - and later eleven - PDP Governors filed a suit (SC/CV/329/2025) at the Supreme Court. They argue that the President lacks constitutional authority to suspend elected officials or dissolve state institutions via emergency rule - claiming this violates Sections 1(2), 5(2), 176, 180, 188, 192, and 305. They’re asking the apex court among others to: 1. Nullify the emergency declaration and the suspension of democratic institutions. 2. Prohibit future abuse of such power. 3. Void the appointment of a sole administrator. Since then, many of us are left wondering: Why has the Supreme Court not delivered judgment on this matter? What is delaying the hearing and determination of the case? Is there an intentional stalling of justice to allow the situation to be overtaken by events and, thereby, justify an eventual ruling that favours the presidency? Let me be clear: this is not about Governor Siminalayi Fubara, former Governor Nyesom Wike, or President Bola Tinubu. Frankly, I am not concerned with their individual political ambitions or internal rivalries. Most of our contemporary politicians, regardless of how they try to rebrand themselves or appeal to the public, have historically not demonstrated genuine care for the welfare of the masses. My concern lies with the integrity of our constitutional democracy and the rule of law. We are a federal republic, and in a federal system, governmental powers are constitutionally divided between the national and subnational governments. The 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) makes provision for the autonomy of democratically elected officials at both the state and national levels. Thus, can a sitting President, unilaterally and without due process, suspend a democratically elected governor or dissolve institutions created by the Constitution? If so, where does the Constitution permit such action? If not, what is the constitutional remedy? These are the questions that demand urgent and authoritative interpretation from the Supreme Court. If this issue remains unresolved, it may set a dangerous precedent that future Presidents could exploit. It opens a constitutional vacuum that could lead to executive tyranny - a scenario where elected state officials may be suspended at will by federal authorities under vague claims of "Emergency Rule." Therefore, we respectfully call on the Supreme Court of Nigeria to give this case the attention it urgently deserves. We also appeal to constitutional lawyers, civil society organizations, and all defenders of democracy and justice to speak up and demand clarity and accountability. Let this not be swept under the carpet. For the sake of constitutional governance and the preservation of democratic norms, we ask: Why has this case not been given a speedy hearing? This is not a matter of party politics, but a call for justice, legality, and constitutional fidelity. The future of our democracy may very well depend on how this moment is handled. God bless the Federal Republic of Nigeria. — Pastor Jerry A. H. |
A CALL FOR CLARITY AND CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION: The Rivers State Case Before the Supreme Court I am not a politician, and I have no intention of becoming one at this time - even though I studied Political Science and was actively involved in student politics, at some point, contested and won an election on campus, which led to my emergence as the Speaker of the Students' Union Government Parliament. My decision not to enter politics is not because I am a clergyman or that it is somehow sinful. No. Politics, in itself, is not a sin. As members of society, we are all inevitably affected by political decisions made through the mechanisms of governance, particularly within the framework of the Social Contract Theory. However, my personal decision to avoid politics is based on the unfortunate reality of our present political climate - one that has been marred by partisanship, manipulation, and a troubling lack of accountability. That said, my interest in this matter stems not from partisan loyalty, but from a genuine concern for constitutional order and the future of democratic governance in Nigeria. On March 18, 2025, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu declared a six-month State of Emergency in Rivers State under Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution, suspending the elected Governor, Deputy Governor, and all Members of the State Assembly. He appointed Retired Vice Admiral Ibokette Ibas as the Sole Administrator. In response, seven - and later eleven - PDP Governors filed a suit (SC/CV/329/2025) at the Supreme Court. They argue that the President lacks constitutional authority to suspend elected officials or dissolve state institutions via emergency rule - claiming this violates Sections 1(2), 5(2), 176, 180, 188, 192, and 305. They’re asking the apex court among others to: 1. Nullify the emergency declaration and the suspension of democratic institutions. 2. Prohibit future abuse of such power. 3. Void the appointment of a sole administrator. Since then, many of us are left wondering: Why has the Supreme Court not delivered judgment on this matter? What is delaying the hearing and determination of the case? Is there an intentional stalling of justice to allow the situation to be overtaken by events and, thereby, justify an eventual ruling that favours the presidency? Let me be clear: this is not about Governor Siminalayi Fubara, former Governor Nyesom Wike, or President Bola Tinubu. Frankly, I am not concerned with their individual political ambitions or internal rivalries. Most of our contemporary politicians, regardless of how they try to rebrand themselves or appeal to the public, have historically not demonstrated genuine care for the welfare of the masses. My concern lies with the integrity of our constitutional democracy and the rule of law. We are a federal republic, and in a federal system, governmental powers are constitutionally divided between the national and subnational governments. The 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) makes provision for the autonomy of democratically elected officials at both the state and national levels. Thus, can a sitting President, unilaterally and without due process, suspend a democratically elected governor or dissolve institutions created by the Constitution? If so, where does the Constitution permit such action? If not, what is the constitutional remedy? These are the questions that demand urgent and authoritative interpretation from the Supreme Court. If this issue remains unresolved, it may set a dangerous precedent that future Presidents could exploit. It opens a constitutional vacuum that could lead to executive tyranny - a scenario where elected state officials may be suspended at will by federal authorities under vague claims of "Emergency Rule." Therefore, we respectfully call on the Supreme Court of Nigeria to give this case the attention it urgently deserves. We also appeal to constitutional lawyers, civil society organizations, and all defenders of democracy and justice to speak up and demand clarity and accountability. Let this not be swept under the carpet. For the sake of constitutional governance and the preservation of democratic norms, we ask: Why has this case not been given a speedy hearing? This is not a matter of party politics, but a call for justice, legality, and constitutional fidelity. The future of our democracy may very well depend on how this moment is handled. God bless the Federal Republic of Nigeria. — Pastor Jerry A. H. |
A CALL FOR CLARITY AND CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION: The Rivers State Case Before the Supreme Court I am not a politician, and I have no intention of becoming one at this time - even though I studied Political Science and was actively involved in student politics, at some point, contested and won an election on campus, which led to my emergence as the Speaker of the Students' Union Government Parliament. My decision not to enter politics is not because I am a clergyman or that it is somehow sinful. No. Politics, in itself, is not a sin. As members of society, we are all inevitably affected by political decisions made through the mechanisms of governance, particularly within the framework of the Social Contract Theory. However, my personal decision to avoid politics is based on the unfortunate reality of our present political climate - one that has been marred by partisanship, manipulation, and a troubling lack of accountability. That said, my interest in this matter stems not from partisan loyalty, but from a genuine concern for constitutional order and the future of democratic governance in Nigeria. On March 18, 2025, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu declared a six-month State of Emergency in Rivers State under Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution, suspending the elected Governor, Deputy Governor, and all Members of the State Assembly. He appointed Retired Vice Admiral Ibokette Ibas as the Sole Administrator. In response, seven - and later eleven - PDP Governors filed a suit (SC/CV/329/2025) at the Supreme Court. They argue that the President lacks constitutional authority to suspend elected officials or dissolve state institutions via emergency rule - claiming this violates Sections 1(2), 5(2), 176, 180, 188, 192, and 305. They’re asking the apex court among others to: 1. Nullify the emergency declaration and the suspension of democratic institutions. 2. Prohibit future abuse of such power. 3. Void the appointment of a sole administrator. Since then, many of us are left wondering: Why has the Supreme Court not delivered judgment on this matter? What is delaying the hearing and determination of the case? Is there an intentional stalling of justice to allow the situation to be overtaken by events and, thereby, justify an eventual ruling that favours the presidency? Let me be clear: this is not about Governor Siminalayi Fubara, former Governor Nyesom Wike, or President Bola Tinubu. Frankly, I am not concerned with their individual political ambitions or internal rivalries. Most of our contemporary politicians, regardless of how they try to rebrand themselves or appeal to the public, have historically not demonstrated genuine care for the welfare of the masses. My concern lies with the integrity of our constitutional democracy and the rule of law. We are a federal republic, and in a federal system, governmental powers are constitutionally divided between the national and subnational governments. The 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) makes provision for the autonomy of democratically elected officials at both the state and national levels. Thus, can a sitting President, unilaterally and without due process, suspend a democratically elected governor or dissolve institutions created by the Constitution? If so, where does the Constitution permit such action? If not, what is the constitutional remedy? These are the questions that demand urgent and authoritative interpretation from the Supreme Court. If this issue remains unresolved, it may set a dangerous precedent that future Presidents could exploit. It opens a constitutional vacuum that could lead to executive tyranny - a scenario where elected state officials may be suspended at will by federal authorities under vague claims of "Emergency Rule." Therefore, we respectfully call on the Supreme Court of Nigeria to give this case the attention it urgently deserves. We also appeal to constitutional lawyers, civil society organizations, and all defenders of democracy and justice to speak up and demand clarity and accountability. Let this not be swept under the carpet. For the sake of constitutional governance and the preservation of democratic norms, we ask: Why has this case not been given a speedy hearing? This is not a matter of party politics, but a call for justice, legality, and constitutional fidelity. The future of our democracy may very well depend on how this moment is handled. God bless the Federal Republic of Nigeria. — Pastor Jerry A. H. |
A CALL FOR CLARITY AND CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION: The Rivers State Case Before the Supreme Court I am not a politician, and I have no intention of becoming one at this time - even though I studied Political Science and was actively involved in student politics, at some point, contested and won an election on campus, which led to my emergence as the Speaker of the Students' Union Government Parliament. My decision not to enter politics is not because I am a clergyman or that it is somehow sinful. No. Politics, in itself, is not a sin. As members of society, we are all inevitably affected by political decisions made through the mechanisms of governance, particularly within the framework of the Social Contract Theory. However, my personal decision to avoid politics is based on the unfortunate reality of our present political climate - one that has been marred by partisanship, manipulation, and a troubling lack of accountability. That said, my interest in this matter stems not from partisan loyalty, but from a genuine concern for constitutional order and the future of democratic governance in Nigeria. On March 18, 2025, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu declared a six-month State of Emergency in Rivers State under Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution, suspending the elected Governor, Deputy Governor, and all Members of the State Assembly. He appointed Retired Vice Admiral Ibokette Ibas as the Sole Administrator. In response, seven - and later eleven - PDP Governors filed a suit (SC/CV/329/2025) at the Supreme Court. They argue that the President lacks constitutional authority to suspend elected officials or dissolve state institutions via emergency rule - claiming this violates Sections 1(2), 5(2), 176, 180, 188, 192, and 305. They’re asking the apex court among others to: 1. Nullify the emergency declaration and the suspension of democratic institutions. 2. Prohibit future abuse of such power. 3. Void the appointment of a sole administrator. Since then, many of us are left wondering: Why has the Supreme Court not delivered judgment on this matter? What is delaying the hearing and determination of the case? Is there an intentional stalling of justice to allow the situation to be overtaken by events and, thereby, justify an eventual ruling that favours the presidency? Let me be clear: this is not about Governor Siminalayi Fubara, former Governor Nyesom Wike, or President Bola Tinubu. Frankly, I am not concerned with their individual political ambitions or internal rivalries. Most of our contemporary politicians, regardless of how they try to rebrand themselves or appeal to the public, have historically not demonstrated genuine care for the welfare of the masses. My concern lies with the integrity of our constitutional democracy and the rule of law. We are a federal republic, and in a federal system, governmental powers are constitutionally divided between the national and subnational governments. The 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) makes provision for the autonomy of democratically elected officials at both the state and national levels. Thus, can a sitting President, unilaterally and without due process, suspend a democratically elected governor or dissolve institutions created by the Constitution? If so, where does the Constitution permit such action? If not, what is the constitutional remedy? These are the questions that demand urgent and authoritative interpretation from the Supreme Court. If this issue remains unresolved, it may set a dangerous precedent that future Presidents could exploit. It opens a constitutional vacuum that could lead to executive tyranny - a scenario where elected state officials may be suspended at will by federal authorities under vague claims of "Emergency Rule." Therefore, we respectfully call on the Supreme Court of Nigeria to give this case the attention it urgently deserves. We also appeal to constitutional lawyers, civil society organizations, and all defenders of democracy and justice to speak up and demand clarity and accountability. Let this not be swept under the carpet. For the sake of constitutional governance and the preservation of democratic norms, we ask: Why has this case not been given a speedy hearing? This is not a matter of party politics, but a call for justice, legality, and constitutional fidelity. The future of our democracy may very well depend on how this moment is handled. God bless the Federal Republic of Nigeria. — Pastor Jerry A. H. |
A CALL FOR CLARITY AND CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION: The Rivers State Case Before the Supreme Court I am not a politician, and I have no intention of becoming one at this time - even though I studied Political Science and was actively involved in student politics, at some point, contested and won an election on campus, which led to my emergence as the Speaker of the Students' Union Government Parliament. My decision not to enter politics is not because I am a clergyman or that it is somehow sinful. No. Politics, in itself, is not a sin. As members of society, we are all inevitably affected by political decisions made through the mechanisms of governance, particularly within the framework of the Social Contract Theory. However, my personal decision to avoid politics is based on the unfortunate reality of our present political climate - one that has been marred by partisanship, manipulation, and a troubling lack of accountability. That said, my interest in this matter stems not from partisan loyalty, but from a genuine concern for constitutional order and the future of democratic governance in Nigeria. On March 18, 2025, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu declared a six-month State of Emergency in Rivers State under Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution, suspending the elected Governor, Deputy Governor, and all Members of the State Assembly. He appointed Retired Vice Admiral Ibokette Ibas as the Sole Administrator. In response, seven - and later eleven - PDP Governors filed a suit (SC/CV/329/2025) at the Supreme Court. They argue that the President lacks constitutional authority to suspend elected officials or dissolve state institutions via emergency rule - claiming this violates Sections 1(2), 5(2), 176, 180, 188, 192, and 305. They’re asking the apex court among others to: 1. Nullify the emergency declaration and the suspension of democratic institutions. 2. Prohibit future abuse of such power. 3. Void the appointment of a sole administrator. Since then, many of us are left wondering: Why has the Supreme Court not delivered judgment on this matter? What is delaying the hearing and determination of the case? Is there an intentional stalling of justice to allow the situation to be overtaken by events and, thereby, justify an eventual ruling that favours the presidency? Let me be clear: this is not about Governor Siminalayi Fubara, former Governor Nyesom Wike, or President Bola Tinubu. Frankly, I am not concerned with their individual political ambitions or internal rivalries. Most of our contemporary politicians, regardless of how they try to rebrand themselves or appeal to the public, have historically not demonstrated genuine care for the welfare of the masses. My concern lies with the integrity of our constitutional democracy and the rule of law. We are a federal republic, and in a federal system, governmental powers are constitutionally divided between the national and subnational governments. The 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) makes provision for the autonomy of democratically elected officials at both the state and national levels. Thus, can a sitting President, unilaterally and without due process, suspend a democratically elected governor or dissolve institutions created by the Constitution? If so, where does the Constitution permit such action? If not, what is the constitutional remedy? These are the questions that demand urgent and authoritative interpretation from the Supreme Court. If this issue remains unresolved, it may set a dangerous precedent that future Presidents could exploit. It opens a constitutional vacuum that could lead to executive tyranny - a scenario where elected state officials may be suspended at will by federal authorities under vague claims of "Emergency Rule." Therefore, we respectfully call on the Supreme Court of Nigeria to give this case the attention it urgently deserves. We also appeal to constitutional lawyers, civil society organizations, and all defenders of democracy and justice to speak up and demand clarity and accountability. Let this not be swept under the carpet. For the sake of constitutional governance and the preservation of democratic norms, we ask: Why has this case not been given a speedy hearing? This is not a matter of party politics, but a call for justice, legality, and constitutional fidelity. The future of our democracy may very well depend on how this moment is handled. God bless the Federal Republic of Nigeria. — Pastor Jerry A. H. |
dmercy141983:Where is NLC Rivers State Chapter? Are we going to keep quiet or wait till when the uncertain happens. When it comes to arbitrary deductions, you will see NLC. Now to question the reason behind the delay of salary payment, you won't see them again. I think is high time we rise against labour. |
Misterone:That is why we are where we are. Nigerian government does not priorities education and health. Let me tell my brother if that money was used for renovation of the schools and health centers in Abuja, the resultant effects on the economy of Abuja and the country at large will just surprise you. |
SocialFinance:You should be ashamed of yourself. So you mean pipelines are now more important than human beings that are been killed everyday in other parts of the country. |
akpumping7720:Oga the case is not between Fubara vs Tinubu. The case was filed by some PDP Governors. All what they want is for the Supreme court to interpret the constitutional provisions that empowers the President on the declaration of State of Emergency and the Right to Remove an elected Governor/State Parliamentarians. This is a constitutional matter and not a criminal or civil case. |
What is the Supreme Court of Nigeria Afraid of exactly? As of June 4, 2025, the supreme court of Nigeria has not yet scheduled a hearing date for the case filed by 11 Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governors challenging the federal government's declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State. The case, registered as SC/CV/329/2025, was expected to be addressed after the court's Easter recess, which concluded at the end of April. The lawsuit contests President Bola Tinubu's March 18 declaration of emergency rule in Rivers State, which involved suspending Governor Siminalayi Fubara, Deputy Governor Ngozi Odu, and all members of the State House of Assembly for six months. Retired Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas was appointed as the Sole Administrator during this period. The PDP governors argue that these actions exceed the President's constitutional powers and undermine democratic federalism. Despite the urgency of the matter, the supreme court has yet to fix a hearing date, leading to criticism from civil rights groups like the Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA), which accuses the court of stalling proceedings on this critical constitutional issue. |
What is the Supreme Court of Nigeria Afraid of exactly? As of June 4, 2025, the supreme court of Nigeria has not yet scheduled a hearing date for the case filed by 11 Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governors challenging the federal government's declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State. The case, registered as SC/CV/329/2025, was expected to be addressed after the court's Easter recess, which concluded at the end of April. The lawsuit contests President Bola Tinubu's March 18 declaration of emergency rule in Rivers State, which involved suspending Governor Siminalayi Fubara, Deputy Governor Ngozi Odu, and all members of the State House of Assembly for six months. Retired Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas was appointed as the Sole Administrator during this period. The PDP governors argue that these actions exceed the President's constitutional powers and undermine democratic federalism. Despite the urgency of the matter, the supreme court has yet to fix a hearing date, leading to criticism from civil rights groups like the Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA), which accuses the court of stalling proceedings on this critical constitutional issue. |
What is the Supreme Court of Nigeria Afraid of exactly? As of June 4, 2025, the supreme court of Nigeria has not yet scheduled a hearing date for the case filed by 11 Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governors challenging the federal government's declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State. The case, registered as SC/CV/329/2025, was expected to be addressed after the court's Easter recess, which concluded at the end of April. The lawsuit contests President Bola Tinubu's March 18 declaration of emergency rule in Rivers State, which involved suspending Governor Siminalayi Fubara, Deputy Governor Ngozi Odu, and all members of the State House of Assembly for six months. Retired Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas was appointed as the Sole Administrator during this period. The PDP governors argue that these actions exceed the President's constitutional powers and undermine democratic federalism. Despite the urgency of the matter, the supreme court has yet to fix a hearing date, leading to criticism from civil rights groups like the Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA), which accuses the court of stalling proceedings on this critical constitutional issue. |
What is the Supreme Court of Nigeria Afraid of exactly? As of June 4, 2025, the supreme court of Nigeria has not yet scheduled a hearing date for the case filed by 11 Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governors challenging the federal government's declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State. The case, registered as SC/CV/329/2025, was expected to be addressed after the court's Easter recess, which concluded at the end of April. The lawsuit contests President Bola Tinubu's March 18 declaration of emergency rule in Rivers State, which involved suspending Governor Siminalayi Fubara, Deputy Governor Ngozi Odu, and all members of the State House of Assembly for six months. Retired Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas was appointed as the Sole Administrator during this period. The PDP governors argue that these actions exceed the President's constitutional powers and undermine democratic federalism. Despite the urgency of the matter, the supreme court has yet to fix a hearing date, leading to criticism from civil rights groups like the Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA), which accuses the court of stalling proceedings on this critical constitutional issue. |
What is the Supreme Court of Nigeria Afraid of exactly? As of June 4, 2025, the supreme court of Nigeria has not yet scheduled a hearing date for the case filed by 11 Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governors challenging the federal government's declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State. The case, registered as SC/CV/329/2025, was expected to be addressed after the court's Easter recess, which concluded at the end of April. The lawsuit contests President Bola Tinubu's March 18 declaration of emergency rule in Rivers State, which involved suspending Governor Siminalayi Fubara, Deputy Governor Ngozi Odu, and all members of the State House of Assembly for six months. Retired Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas was appointed as the Sole Administrator during this period. The PDP governors argue that these actions exceed the President's constitutional powers and undermine democratic federalism. Despite the urgency of the matter, the supreme court has yet to fix a hearing date, leading to criticism from civil rights groups like the Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA), which accuses the court of stalling proceedings on this critical constitutional issue. |