₦airaland Forum

ruggedtimi:
I keep wondering what they mean by igbo's marginalized, I havnt been to any bank in southsouth where there is no igbo man working as a staff, today if you mention top10 oil magnates in nigeria igbo men takes 50%. Igbo men controls all the major markets in nigeria from onitsha to mile 1 ph to oil mill ph to alaba market lagos and am sure markets in kano and kaduna. 50% of nnpc staffs are igbos. Nollywood is dominated by the igbos, igbo has produced more senate president than any other tribe.

Pls, maybe u shud start sayin some truth.
Why not build a seaport @niger river in onitsha. Why not include SE in d rail project,
Pls gv us names of the 50%nnpc igbo staffs, & past senate presidents, then also name past heads of states n presidents since 1960, lets reach somewhere. Lol.

okum1:
Is Nigerian army trying to justify military action in the southeast? I got this massage this morning from a friend of mine who is an army officer. and I reply him: #I am a #Nigerian and i do not support #military actions in the #East. how about you? read below.


In DOKUBO-ASARI V. FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA (2007) ALL FWLR (PT 375) 588, The Supreme Court per Muhammed JSC (CJN Rtd.) had this to say:

"Where national security is threatened or there is real likelihood of its being threatened, human rights or individual rights of those responsible take second place. Human Rights or individual rights must be suspended until national security can be protected or taken care of. This is not anything new. The corporate existence of Nigeria as a united, harmonious, indivisible and indissoluble sovereign nation is certainly greater than any citizen's liberty or right. Once the security of this nation is in jeopardy and it survives in pieces rather than in peace, the individual liberty or right may not even exist"

@Page 585-586.

From the above holding of the Supreme Court, the action of the Nigerian military in the Southeast is justifiable. That's my take and you...?

Please, i dnt understand this country ooo, when did ipob play d kind of activities that boko haram & Herdsmen played that dey are labelling them terrorist? [b]

okum1:
Is Nigerian army trying to justify military action in the southeast? I got this massage this morning from a friend of mine who is an army officer. and I reply him: #I am a #Nigerian and i do not support #military actions in the #East. how about you? read below.


In DOKUBO-ASARI V. FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA (2007) ALL FWLR (PT 375) 588, The Supreme Court per Muhammed JSC (CJN Rtd.) had this to say:

"Where national security is threatened or there is real likelihood of its being threatened, human rights or individual rights of those responsible take second place. Human Rights or individual rights must be suspended until national security can be protected or taken care of. This is not anything new. The corporate existence of Nigeria as a united, harmonious, indivisible and indissoluble sovereign nation is certainly greater than any citizen's liberty or right. Once the security of this nation is in jeopardy and it survives in pieces rather than in peace, the individual liberty or right may not even exist"

@Page 585-586.

From the above holding of the Supreme Court, the action of the Nigerian military in the Southeast is justifiable. That's my take and you...?

Please, i dnt understand this country ooo, when did ipob play d kind of activities that boko haram & Herdsmen played that dey are labelling them terrorist? [/b]

okum1:
Is Nigerian army trying to justify military action in the southeast? I got this massage this morning from a friend of mine who is an army officer. and I reply him: #I am a #Nigerian and i do not support #military actions in the #East. how about you? read below.


In DOKUBO-ASARI V. FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA (2007) ALL FWLR (PT 375) 588, The Supreme Court per Muhammed JSC (CJN Rtd.) had this to say:

"Where national security is threatened or there is real likelihood of its being threatened, human rights or individual rights of those responsible take second place. Human Rights or individual rights must be suspended until national security can be protected or taken care of. This is not anything new. The corporate existence of Nigeria as a united, harmonious, indivisible and indissoluble sovereign nation is certainly greater than any citizen's liberty or right. Once the security of this nation is in jeopardy and it survives in pieces rather than in peace, the individual liberty or right may not even exist"

@Page 585-586.

From the above holding of the Supreme Court, the action of the Nigerian military in the Southeast is justifiable. That's my take and you...?

Please, i dnt understand this country ooo, when did ipob play d kind of activities that boko haram & Herdsmen played that dey are labelling them terrorist?