₦airaland Forum

victorjoe:
SCOTUS kor, SCROTUM ni.

You guys can edit, analyse, dissect, formulate theories as long as you want. Bring out documentaries, no wahala. Come 20th January, 12 noon. If Trump does not leave the White house he will be bundled out!.

He is a bad looser! He is now challenging the same system that put him there in the first place cos it did not go on his favor.

As far as I am concerned, he has done what God wanted him to do in his first term.

trump will be swear in in January 20, 2021, and you will be ashamed of your self.


SUPREME COURT PUTS TEXAS CASE ONTO ITS DOCKET AS
ELECTION DEADLINES APPROACH
by Kevin Ryan
Multiple states have begun issuing statements of support for
the lawsuit filed by Texas that seeks to stop electors from
being appointed in four states. The lawsuit — filed directly with
the U.S. Supreme Court — alleges that election procedures in
Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin violated the
Constitution, tainting the integrity of votes in those states and
debasing votes in states that did not violate the Constitution.
Realizing that several deadlines are approaching for states to
commit electors, Texas says that the court has the power to
delay such dates, and “the only date that is mandated under
the Constitution is January 20, 2021,” referring to inauguration
day.
The lawsuit contends that the defendants:
• Violated the Electors Clause by improperly changing their
voting procedures through judicial or executive action, NOT
through legislation.
• Violated the Equal Protection Clause by effectively allowing
different election rules and procedures in different counties
within the states.
According to the lawsuit:
“Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the
pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding
absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded
their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and
ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are
lawfully received, evaluated, and counted.
“Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts
had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election
less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are
inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-
legislative entities, without any consent by the state
legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated
the Constitution.
“By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only
tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their
actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff
State and other States that remained loyal to the
Constitution.”
Texas is asking the Supreme Court for an injunction to halt the
appointment of electors, and to allow the results to be
reviewed by state legislators, who under the Constitution have
the power to appoint electors themselves. Republicans control
all four state legislatures.
The court “can delay the [December 14] deadline for the
appointment of presidential electors… The only date that is
mandated under the Constitution is January 20, 2021,” the
Texas lawsuit says.
The attorneys-general of Arkansas, Alabama, and Louisiana
have issued statements of support for Texas case today.
The Supreme Court has placed the motion on the docket, but
has yet to adjudicate.


SOURCES:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/
162953/20201207234611533_TX-v-State-Motion-2020-12-07
%20FINAL.pdf
https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-election-lawsuit-texas/
texas-asks-u-s-supreme-court-to-help-trump-upend-election-
idUSKBN28I27I
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/
docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html

DarkJeddi:
Bla Bla Bla Bla Bla!
Anybody that doesn't agree your trash conspiracy theories is a BUHARIST and a Zombie.
After they throw out this trash,you will still be here to tell us on how they are all working for dimentia Biden..

your nairaland username has really tells you who you are. dark and chronic jeddi is destroying your brain. supreme court will do needful on Thursday and other days.

hermesprogidy:
Sorry. You go dey alright.

you dey well before niii.

hermesprogidy:
Newsmax! Jesus!!! No wonder you are hopeful Trump will get anything out of this. Sorry.

newsmax is beaten down foxnews in the media rating. newsmax is doing the needful by broadcasting facts and truths to the general public. check Google on that. stop been deluded here. be well inform.

Bluntemperor:
Yinmu!
It's better for you to relocate to Trump Mara-lego!
What is bad is bad- condemn it so that we have Peace!

kikiki, read this post for better understanding. you are not inform yet. get updated. stop living in your deluded state of mind.


SUPREME COURT PUTS TEXAS CASE ONTO ITS DOCKET AS
ELECTION DEADLINES APPROACH
by Kevin Ryan
Multiple states have begun issuing statements of support for
the lawsuit filed by Texas that seeks to stop electors from
being appointed in four states. The lawsuit — filed directly with
the U.S. Supreme Court — alleges that election procedures in
Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin violated the
Constitution, tainting the integrity of votes in those states and
debasing votes in states that did not violate the Constitution.
Realizing that several deadlines are approaching for states to
commit electors, Texas says that the court has the power to
delay such dates, and “the only date that is mandated under
the Constitution is January 20, 2021,” referring to inauguration
day.
The lawsuit contends that the defendants:
• Violated the Electors Clause by improperly changing their
voting procedures through judicial or executive action, NOT
through legislation.
• Violated the Equal Protection Clause by effectively allowing
different election rules and procedures in different counties
within the states.
According to the lawsuit:
“Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the
pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding
absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded
their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and
ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are
lawfully received, evaluated, and counted.
“Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts
had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election
less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are
inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-
legislative entities, without any consent by the state
legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated
the Constitution.
“By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only
tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their
actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff
State and other States that remained loyal to the
Constitution.”
Texas is asking the Supreme Court for an injunction to halt the
appointment of electors, and to allow the results to be
reviewed by state legislators, who under the Constitution have
the power to appoint electors themselves. Republicans control
all four state legislatures.
The court “can delay the [December 14] deadline for the
appointment of presidential electors… The only date that is
mandated under the Constitution is January 20, 2021,” the
Texas lawsuit says.
The attorneys-general of Arkansas, Alabama, and Louisiana
have issued statements of support for Texas case today.
The Supreme Court has placed the motion on the docket, but
has yet to adjudicate.



SOURCES:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/
162953/20201207234611533_TX-v-State-Motion-2020-12-07
%20FINAL.pdf
https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-election-lawsuit-texas/
texas-asks-u-s-supreme-court-to-help-trump-upend-election-
idUSKBN28I27I
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/
docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html

hermesprogidy:
Dream on. So Texas challenges the validity of votes in other States, and you think any sensible Court will let that pass? How about California challenging the validity of votes on Texas and other States Trump won? Don't you see the anarchy that will infold?
Trump is like a fish on land, flailing on its last breath. The whole thing is comical.

SUPREME COURT PUTS TEXAS CASE ONTO ITS DOCKET AS
ELECTION DEADLINES APPROACH
by Kevin Ryan
Multiple states have begun issuing statements of support for
the lawsuit filed by Texas that seeks to stop electors from
being appointed in four states. The lawsuit — filed directly with
the U.S. Supreme Court — alleges that election procedures in
Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin violated the
Constitution, tainting the integrity of votes in those states and
debasing votes in states that did not violate the Constitution.
Realizing that several deadlines are approaching for states to
commit electors, Texas says that the court has the power to
delay such dates, and “the only date that is mandated under
the Constitution is January 20, 2021,” referring to inauguration
day.
The lawsuit contends that the defendants:
• Violated the Electors Clause by improperly changing their
voting procedures through judicial or executive action, NOT
through legislation.
• Violated the Equal Protection Clause by effectively allowing
different election rules and procedures in different counties
within the states.
According to the lawsuit:
“Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the
pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding
absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded
their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and
ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are
lawfully received, evaluated, and counted.
“Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts
had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election
less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are
inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-
legislative entities, without any consent by the state
legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated
the Constitution.
“By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only
tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their
actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff
State and other States that remained loyal to the
Constitution.”
Texas is asking the Supreme Court for an injunction to halt the
appointment of electors, and to allow the results to be
reviewed by state legislators, who under the Constitution have
the power to appoint electors themselves. Republicans control
all four state legislatures.
The court “can delay the [December 14] deadline for the
appointment of presidential electors… The only date that is
mandated under the Constitution is January 20, 2021,” the
Texas lawsuit says.
The attorneys-general of Arkansas, Alabama, and Louisiana
have issued statements of support for Texas case today.
The Supreme Court has placed the motion on the docket, but
has yet to adjudicate.



SOURCES:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/
162953/20201207234611533_TX-v-State-Motion-2020-12-07
%20FINAL.pdf
https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-election-lawsuit-texas/
texas-asks-u-s-supreme-court-to-help-trump-upend-election-
idUSKBN28I27I
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/
docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html

DarkJeddi:
I don't need to read YOUR POST,..
If I need news on the American elections,I know where to go to..
The lame Texas petition is another trash petition,..
Like many trash before,it is going to the shithole..

and that's why you are not updated at all. an illiterate buharist thinking. Bleep off joor. read the article and understand.

ceejayluv:
So you recommend alternative media that's full of crap with no reputation to sustain.

watch newsmax, theblazetv and newspaper, thegatewaypundit.com, theepoch times too

DarkJeddi:
Lol,
Thursday is tomorrow and you will be back to spine another tales by moonlight after the supreme Court throws out the useless petition..

so you are part of justice of the USA supreme court. keep on living in your deluded state of mind. rubbish thinking. buharist and zombie are not difficult to identify.

Rebelutionary:
There was a time when the silly line was stop watching CNN and watch fox cos they bought into the Trump B.S but now that they were the first to call some states for Biden, they have all of sudden become Lamestream like how do you folks reason abeg!

stop watching and reading main stream media. they are fake news outlets created by leftists Democrats party to caused conflicts and confusion in the media.

DarkJeddi:
Bla Bla Bla,Bla..
Another useless petition to be thrown into the Cesspool..

novice buharist, you read the article at all. keep on living in your deluded state of mind.

Rebelutionary:
If your senior colleague righteousness89 has left this matter as we say in Nigeria "for God hand", usef go soon learn! Goodmorning o

lol you are tired already. fuvk off from here. read this article and stop watching and reading main stream media. they are fake news outlets created by leftists Democrats party.

SUPREME COURT PUTS TEXAS CASE ONTO ITS DOCKET AS
ELECTION DEADLINES APPROACH
by Kevin Ryan
Multiple states have begun issuing statements of support for
the lawsuit filed by Texas that seeks to stop electors from
being appointed in four states. The lawsuit — filed directly with
the U.S. Supreme Court — alleges that election procedures in
Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin violated the
Constitution, tainting the integrity of votes in those states and
debasing votes in states that did not violate the Constitution.
Realizing that several deadlines are approaching for states to
commit electors, Texas says that the court has the power to
delay such dates, and “the only date that is mandated under
the Constitution is January 20, 2021,” referring to inauguration
day.
The lawsuit contends that the defendants:
• Violated the Electors Clause by improperly changing their
voting procedures through judicial or executive action, NOT
through legislation.
• Violated the Equal Protection Clause by effectively allowing
different election rules and procedures in different counties
within the states.
According to the lawsuit:
“Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the
pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding
absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded
their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and
ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are
lawfully received, evaluated, and counted.
“Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts
had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election
less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are
inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-
legislative entities, without any consent by the state
legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated
the Constitution.
“By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only
tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their
actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff
State and other States that remained loyal to the
Constitution.”
Texas is asking the Supreme Court for an injunction to halt the
appointment of electors, and to allow the results to be
reviewed by state legislators, who under the Constitution have
the power to appoint electors themselves. Republicans control
all four state legislatures.
The court “can delay the [December 14] deadline for the
appointment of presidential electors… The only date that is
mandated under the Constitution is January 20, 2021,” the
Texas lawsuit says.
The attorneys-general of Arkansas, Alabama, and Louisiana
have issued statements of support for Texas case today.
The Supreme Court has placed the motion on the docket, but
has yet to adjudicate.



SOURCES:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/
162953/20201207234611533_TX-v-State-Motion-2020-12-07
%20FINAL.pdf
https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-election-lawsuit-texas/
texas-asks-u-s-supreme-court-to-help-trump-upend-election-
idUSKBN28I27I
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/
docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html

SUPREME COURT PUTS TEXAS CASE ONTO ITS DOCKET AS ELECTION DEADLINES APPROACH by Kevin Ryan Multiple states have begun issuing statements of support for the lawsuit filed by Texas that seeks to stop electors from being appointed in four states. The lawsuit — filed directly with the U.S. Supreme Court — alleges that election procedures in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin violated the Constitution, tainting the integrity of votes in those states and debasing votes in states that did not violate the Constitution. Realizing that several deadlines are approaching for states to commit electors, Texas says that the court has the power to delay such dates, and “the only date that is mandated under the Constitution is January 20, 2021,” referring to inauguration day. The lawsuit contends that the defendants: • Violated the Electors Clause by improperly changing their voting procedures through judicial or executive action, NOT through legislation. • Violated the Equal Protection Clause by effectively allowing different election rules and procedures in different counties within the states. According to the lawsuit: “Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. “Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non- legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution. “By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.” Texas is asking the Supreme Court for an injunction to halt the appointment of electors, and to allow the results to be reviewed by state legislators, who under the Constitution have the power to appoint electors themselves. Republicans control all four state legislatures. The court “can delay the [December 14] deadline for the appointment of presidential electors… The only date that is mandated under the Constitution is January 20, 2021,” the Texas lawsuit says. The attorneys-general of Arkansas, Alabama, and Louisiana have issued statements of support for Texas case today. The Supreme Court has placed the motion on the docket, but has yet to adjudicate. SOURCES: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/ 162953/20201207234611533_TX-v-State-Motion-2020-12-07 %20FINAL.pdf https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-election-lawsuit-texas/ texas-asks-u-s-supreme-court-to-help-trump-upend-election- idUSKBN28I27I https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/ docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html

Openbusiness:
https://www.newsweek.com/texas-election-lawsuit-georgia-michigan-wisconsin-pennsylvania-supreme-court-1553191

SUPREME COURT.⚖️ BREAKING: "Response to the motion [is] due Thursday, December 10, by 3 pm." SCOTUS issues
*deadline* to Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin & Georgia to respond to Texas lawsuit charging states with violating the U.S. Constitution with unlawful state elections.

DarkJeddi:
The date is January 20th 2021,after dementia Biden is sworn in,you can go cry on a pair of Dumps knickers..

that's in your deluded state of mind. funny novice buharist.

sandland:
After the safe harbor day, Dec. 8th, no court in Us can overturn a certified result.

nope you are wrong. update yourself OK. stop watching and reading main stream media. they are fake news outlets.

SUPREME COURT.⚖️ BREAKING: "Response to the motion [is] due Thursday, December 10, by 3 pm." SCOTUS issues
*deadline* to Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin & Georgia to respond to Texas lawsuit charging states with violating the U.S. Constitution with unlawful state elections.

Bigchristo:
stop wasting your time writing full episodes,Trump has lost the election it’s so difficult for him and the republicans to concede defeats he is only trying to make gullible people like you to believe his illegal claims about electoral fraud, he doesn’t have any tangible evidence to backup this claim that’s why his entire lawsuit are being tossed out of court room

stupid and clueless thinking from a novice buharist.

ponziponzi:
That’s not true. The US Supreme Court just acknowledged that they received the filings.

stop watching and reading main stream media. they are fake news outlets.

SUPREME COURT.⚖️ BREAKING: "Response to the motion [is] due Thursday, December 10, by 3 pm." SCOTUS issues
*deadline* to Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin & Georgia to respond to Texas lawsuit charging states with violating the U.S. Constitution with unlawful state elections.

NdigboWorldwide:
Are you with us?

I'm with the truths and justice.

DarkJeddi:
Name one court case your Hero have won since he has been bleating like a castrated ram?
Whether the Rebulicans like it or not, Biden is incoming..
Court cases are not won on Twitter..
Let them continue pandering to Dump,.
The date is January 20 2021 and we from the Shithole will witness a new American president..

go and swear in dementia biden now. besides the inaugural committee doesn't recognized dementia and electoral fraudster biden as the President elect.

Sultannayef:
Johnnyessence, stop dreaming.
Put this time into productive venture.

keep on deceiving yourself why trump winning big in the court of law. update yourself on USA poll and its litigations in the court.
stop watching and reading main stream media. they are fake news outlets.


SUPREME COURT.⚖️ BREAKING: "Response to the motion [is] due Thursday, December 10, by 3 pm." SCOTUS issues
*deadline* to Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin & Georgia to respond to Texas lawsuit charging states with violating the U.S. Constitution with unlawful state elections.

Obrigardo:
They are not hearing the case, slow learner. They are calling for the defendants to state why Texas case should not come up the courts.

they are hearing it. stop living in your deluded state of mind. update yourself OK.

SUPREME COURT.⚖️ BREAKING: "Response to the motion [is] due Thursday, December 10, by 3 pm." SCOTUS issues
*deadline* to Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin & Georgia to respond to Texas lawsuit charging states with violating the U.S. Constitution with unlawful state elections.

nelsonoba:
Get your facts right! The court only rejected the emergency Injunctive bid, to stop certification, not the case itself. Trump's Lawyer clarified that. Besides, Texas and 9 other states have filed a new case with the Supreme Court yesterday to throw out Joe Biden's fraudulent win in Wisconson, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Georgia

you are very right, abeg tell them ooo.

SUPREME COURT.⚖️ BREAKING: "Response to the motion [is] due Thursday, December 10, by 3 pm." SCOTUS issues
*deadline* to Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin & Georgia to respond to Texas lawsuit charging states with violating the U.S. Constitution with unlawful state elections.

kingxsamz:
Omo, it must really be hard for you being a Nigerian Trump supporter.
You're only going through the 5 stages of grief.
Soon, all this your long epistles would be irrelevant like the ones you've been posting before.
No dey give yourself false hope.

keep on living in your deluded state of mind. leave trump alone and focus on your clueless nepotistic buhari.

Obrigardo:
They are not hearing the case, slow learner. They are calling for the defendants to state why Texas case should not come up the courts.

they are hearing the case, you are now updating yourself on USA poll and its litigations in the court.

SUPREME COURT.⚖️ BREAKING: "Response to the motion [is] due Thursday, December 10, by 3 pm." SCOTUS issues
*deadline* to Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin & Georgia to respond to Texas lawsuit charging states with violating the U.S. Constitution with unlawful state elections.

ekestic1976:
Won ti fi se e o. Claiming to know America more than Americans. Bet you've never stepped into a foreign embassy all your life.

oponu ode ofun gbemu. you aren't God OK. the lord that started his works will finish it. keep on living in your deluded state of mind. I will post my travelling details when I'm through. oponu Ayirada, OMA pe ko to ye ooo.

ceejayluv:
Lol, electoral fraud without evidence,.... Make we see

electoral frauds evidence is much abundant. you are not current at all. stop watching and reading main stream media.

Bigchristo:
stop wasting your time writing full episodes,Trump has lost the election it’s so difficult for him and the republicans to concede defeats he is only trying to make gullible people like you to believe his illegal claims about electoral fraud, he doesn’t have any tangible evidence to backup this claim that’s why his entire lawsuit are being tossed out of court room

low thinking here. funny reply.

The US Supreme Court has just accepted and will hear the lawsuit that the State of Texas is taking against Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin for electoral fraud !! GREAT DAY !!

Senate resolution to recognize Joe Biden as the real president-elect failed to pass. The Inaugural Committee voted down a resolution by House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) on Tuesday naming Democrat presidential nominee Joe Biden president-elect, with all three Republican members voting against it.

vixpal:
The US Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected a bid by Pennsylvania Republicans to nullify President-elect Joe Biden's victory in the Keystone State, dealing another blow to the long-shot legal effort by President Trump and his allies to overturn the election in the courts.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9W-ZNqQB1pY

The Tuesday order, which was unsigned and included no noted dissents, came ahead of the midnight “safe harbor” deadline, which provides states a kind of immunity from congressional oversight into election results that are certified in time.
The justices’ move leaves intact Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf’s (D) late November certification of Biden’s victory in a state he won by more than 81,000 votes.
It also represents the latest in a lengthy string of defeats for Trump and his allies amid their increasingly implausible legal campaign, which is largely premised on unsupported claims that the election results are invalid due to widespread fraud.

Among the plaintiffs in the Supreme Court petition were Trump ally Rep. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.).

The challengers’ original complaint, filed in Pennsylvania state court late last month, sought to strike down an expanded mail-in ballot policy that Pennsylvania put in place in 2019 after it was passed by the state's GOP-held legislature.



Biden won three of every four mail-in ballots cast in the state, according to an analysis of Pennsylvania Department of State data by The Philadelphia Inquirer.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court tossed the case late last month, citing the litigants' undue delay in bringing the challenge, prompting the petition to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Attorneys for Kelly and the other Pennsylvania Republicans argued that the top state court had violated their due process and other constitutional guarantees.
Lawyers representing the state of Pennsylvania countered that the lawsuit was meritless and cautioned the justices against granting relief.

“No court has ever issued an order nullifying a governor's certification of presidential election results,” they argued in a brief. “The loss of public trust in our constitutional order resulting in this kind of judicial power would be incalculable.”

The emergency application was addressed to Justice Samuel Alito, who handles emergency petitions from Pennsylvania and the surrounding region. Alito could have acted on the request alone, but instead referred the matter to the full court. The court’s denial means that fewer than five justices supported the GOP bid.


The court’s denial came just hours after Trump expressed hope that the Supreme Court would embrace his dubious claims of having won the election.

“Let’s see whether or not somebody has the courage, whether it’s a legislator or legislatures, or whether it’s a justice of the Supreme Court or a number of justices of the Supreme Court,” Trump said during a coronavirus vaccine summit. “Let’s see if they have the courage to do what everybody in this country knows is right.”

Earlier Tuesday the state of Texas filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court against four battleground states in an effort to overturn Biden’s win.

Election law experts who predicted Kelly’s case would be dismissed by the court offered a similar prognostication in the Texas lawsuit.

“I may need to take back what I said about Rep. Kelly’s [Pennsylvania] suit being the dumbest case I’ve ever seen filed on an emergency basis at the Supreme Court,” Rick Hasen, a law professor at the University of California Irvine, wrote on the Election Law Blog. “This new one from the indicted Texas AG Ken Paxton probably should win that prize


https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/529334-supreme-court-rejects-gop-bid-to-nullify-biden-win-in-pennsylvania

Rushing To Judgement And Media Gaslighitng.
Guys, do not let the mainstream media gaslight you concerning
the SCOTUS case filed by some Republicans in Pennsylvania.
Note that this is separate from the one filed by Texas now
joined by other States (more on that later).
The media is now GASLIGHTING people that the SCOTUS has
thrown out the case of these Republicans. They are
desperately doing their best to dampen the spirit of
Republicans.
That is simply not true. The case is still alive and well before
SCOTUS.
Yes, the SCOTUS has DENIED a big ask made by the
Republicans to "overturn" the election result in the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
The Apex Court denied the "emergency injunctive relief"
because it was too radical and would be unprecedented for a
Court to "overturn" the result of an election. But you need to
know that the substantive case is STILL PENDING before the
Court because it has not been heard on the merit.
The injunctive relief was denied by Justice Alito (and not by
the Full Court). Justice Alito denied the injunctive relief to
pave way for a determination of the case on the merit.
See photos 1 and 2 attached below.
Photo 2 is the injunctive relief denied.
In other words, for emphasis, the substantive case has not
been thrown out. Senator Ted Crus will still get to argue before
SCOTUS.
See this link to show that it is still on the Court's schedule;
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=
%2Fdocket%2Fdocketfiles%2Fhtml%2Fpublic%2F20a98.html
Interestingly, the Republican Plaintiffs in their Appeal have
also asked the SCOTUS to ADVISE THEM ON OTHER RELIEFS
THAT MAY BE AVAILABLE TO THEM.
That general prayer or ask is what we should watch out for.
What reliefs would the SCOTUS be willing to grant if their case
succeeds on the merit?
SCOTUS could rule that the case succeeds on the merit and
then restore power to appoint Pennsylvania Electors back to
the Pennsylvania Legislature as per the US Constitution under
the Electors Clause instead of the Pennsylvania Secretary of
State.
Guys, this case is not over!
Immediately the news broke that SCOTUS has thrown out the
case in its entirety, I knew something wasn't right.
Why would SCOTUS accept to hear the case on the merit,
docket it and then dismiss it without a hearing?
It just didn't make any sense.
It didn't make sense because it never happened.
The case is still pending. The Court merely denied one radical
injunctive relief preliminarily. Period.
More information to come on the new States that joined Texas
in their lawsuit at the SCOTUS.