₦airaland Forum

mtisTheQubit:
converting jupiter into a star will be very tricky.almost impossible . It's coz of its mass.have read somewhere that In order to turn Jupiter into a star like the Sun, for example, you would have to add about 1,000 times the mass of Jupiter. But, to make a cooler ‘red dwarf’ you would only need to add about 80 Jupiter masses. So it's actually easier to create a new star from scratch than convert jupiter to one

Jupiter is a very successful planet. As you've stated, though with a lil pessimistic stance it is theoretically possible to terraform it into a sun & that extra mass needed isn't that challenging when you think about it.

Quantum/microscopic black holes don't require a lot of energy to create & with time we'll be able to effectively use these blackholes to terraform Jupiter into our second sun.

Also just FYI it's not easier to create a new star from scratch than to convert jupiter into one, for a new star you'll need stellar nurseries that need stellar black holes that need massive collapsing stars compared to Jupiter which is already a stellar nursery Gass giant on its path to becoming star.

mtisTheQubit:
According to the Kardashev Scale the world is currently a type 0.7 civilization..But reading some posts here I think Africa is still a type 0 civilization...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUvGCwtd0yQ

the world would be a type 1 civilization. Planetary civilization.

Human civilization, however is yet to realize any of the spots in the energy based civilization rankings but we'll achieve planetary system type (ii) civilization soon with improvements in fusion tech creating miniature sun's right here on earth.

Africa isn't a type 0 civilization based on any metric but we're indeed the lowest ranked.

Aderr:
Repeated.

Not necessarily true. The areas mentioned aren't new but the pictures are fairly recent.

kikuyu1:
You're a true archaeogeneticist! Have you studied the subject or is it a hobby? To my great lack of surprise we're slightly more Nilotic than Tutsis.

Was banned twice over lol, redone
More of a hobby but I'm close to the field.

Yes different samples yield different results. Some Tutsi score very high Dinka/nilotic while others not so much (pic 4) Kikuyus like most other Kenyan bantus on average tend to greatly shift towards Nilo-saharans with each new generation due to intermarriages. When more random samples are used you can note that Kikuyus in (Pic 1) are predominantly bantu on average unlike the previous samples. The previous sampled Kikuyus are greatly shifting towards Nilo-saharans that they cluster between maasais & Ethiopian Luos(Anuaks) as seen in (pic 2&3)

If you look at the average Kenyan bantu, possibly more kikuyu samples are included here already & Luhyas (pic 2) they're closer to Nilo-saharan Kenyan Luos who're heavily bantu admixed still Kenyans on average irregardless of language affinity like other Nilotes within the region have close genetic ties to horn Africans like the Cushites & ethiosemites hence they'll easily cluster closer to communities like the Somalis & Oromos than to other groups.