₦airaland Forum

Happy Birthday Great man..!

FRANCE will win 2 - 1

African Union, AU. Should really come into the issue.

WHERE IS THE AFRICAN UNION (AU)?

The Deafening Silence Over Xenophobic Attacks and the June 30 Deadline in South Africa

By PastorKay

Africa is bleeding, yet the continent's highest political body appears to be watching in silence.

As thousands of African migrants flee for their lives in South Africa, abandoning businesses, homes, families, and dreams because of escalating xenophobic violence and the fear surrounding the June 30 ultimatum issued by anti-migrant groups, one painful question echoes across the continent:

Where is the African Union (AU)?

The African Union was founded on the ideals of unity, solidarity, peace, and the protection of Africans everywhere on the continent. It was built on the belief that an attack on one African should concern every African. Yet today, many Africans are wondering whether those ideals still have meaning when fellow Africans are intimidated, attacked, displaced, and forced to flee another African country in search of safety.

This is no longer just a South African issue.

It is an African issue.

When citizens of Nigeria, Ghana, Malawi, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and several other African nations are forced to abandon their homes, businesses, and livelihoods because they fear for their safety, then the dream of African unity is under serious threat. Families are being separated. Children are watching parents leave. Businesses built through years of sacrifice are disappearing overnight. Human dignity is under attack.

The African Union should not be remembered only for organizing summits, issuing statements, and celebrating Africa Day. It should also be remembered for standing firmly with Africans whenever they are threatened anywhere on the continent.

Silence at a time like this sends the wrong message.

Africans deserve answers.

- Where is the emergency summit?
- Where is the united continental response?
- Where is the strong diplomatic intervention?
- Where is the reassurance that every African life truly matters?

In my opinion, the AU's response has fallen far short of what this moment demands. If a member state repeatedly fails to guarantee the safety and dignity of fellow Africans within its borders, then stronger continental measures should be on the table.

In my view, South Africa should already be facing serious consideration for suspension from certain African Union activities until it demonstrates a sustained commitment to protecting all Africans living within its territory. Unity cannot exist without accountability. Membership in a continental body should carry responsibilities as well as privileges.

South Africa undoubtedly faces serious domestic challenges, including unemployment, crime, inequality, and pressure on public services. Those challenges deserve real solutions. However, they can never justify violence, intimidation, or hatred directed at people simply because they come from another African nation. Every sovereign country has the right to enforce its immigration laws, but it also has the responsibility to protect every person within its borders from violence and unlawful persecution.

Africa cannot build the future envisioned in Agenda 2063 while Africans are living in fear of fellow Africans.

History will remember not only those who carried out acts of violence but also those institutions that remained silent when decisive leadership was required.

The African Union still has an opportunity to prove that African solidarity is more than a slogan. It must speak with courage, act with urgency, and demonstrate that the life of every African—regardless of nationality—is equally valuable.

The hope of millions across this continent is that the AU will rise above diplomatic caution and defend the very principles upon which it was founded.

Because if the African Union cannot stand up for Africans in Africa, then who will?

PastorKay is a Social Activist and Political Commentator based in Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Nigerians are never afraid of paying high tarries. All they are saying... Give us light and Nigerians pay their bills diligently.

5 Reasons Why Stable Electricity Is Very Possible in Nigeria. And How It Can Be Achieved.

By PastorKay

This article is a response to a recent publication which argued that Nigerians' desire for cheap electricity is the major obstacle to achieving stable power supply.

The debate over Nigeria's electricity sector has once again taken center stage. A recent article argued that whether it is Bola Tinubu, Peter Obi, Atiku Abubakar, or any other presidential candidate, none can successfully deliver stable electricity because Nigerians resist the reforms required to make the sector work.

While the article raises some important concerns about tariffs, metering, and electricity theft, it misses one crucial point: stable electricity is not only possible in Nigeria, it is achievable within a reasonable time if the right policies are consistently implemented.

History has already shown us the way.

1. Nigeria Has Already Solved a Bigger Infrastructure Problem Before

Many Nigerians are too young to remember how difficult communication was before GSM.

Before 2001, obtaining a telephone line was almost impossible. People waited years, paid huge sums, and still could not get connected. Communication was a luxury.

Then President Olusegun Obasanjo made one bold policy decision: he liberalized the telecom sector, licensed private operators, encouraged investment, and created an environment where businesses could compete.

Government did not build MTN, Glo, Airtel, or Etisalat. It simply created the right policies.

Today, virtually every Nigerian owns a mobile phone. Nigerians willingly spend thousands of naira every month on airtime and data because the service works.

The lesson is simple:

People do not complain about paying for services that are reliable.

2. Nigerians Already Pay More for Electricity Than They Realize

Many argue that Nigerians cannot afford cost-reflective tariffs.

But the truth is different.

Millions of Nigerians already spend enormous amounts every month on:

- Petrol

- Diesel

- Generator maintenance

- Engine oil

- Inverters

- Batteries

- Solar backup systems

For many households and businesses, these costs are far higher than what a reliable grid electricity supply would cost.

Band A has demonstrated this reality. Many consumers who now enjoy significantly improved supply are paying higher tariffs because they are receiving better service.

The real issue is not paying.

The real issue is paying and still sitting in darkness.

3. Stable Electricity Requires Investment, Not Political Slogans

Campaign promises such as "I will deliver 24-hour electricity" or "I will add 10,000MW" sound attractive.

However, generation alone does not solve Nigeria's electricity crisis.

Power must be:
- Generated

- Transmitted

- Distributed

- Metered

- Paid for

- Protected from theft

Every part of the chain must work together.

That requires long-term investment, transparent regulation, and consistent policies—not campaign slogans.

4. Nigerians Must See Value Before They Accept Higher Tariffs

One mistake governments often make is asking citizens to pay more before service improves.

Trust works the opposite way.

Improve supply.

Install prepaid meters.

Reduce estimated billing.

Fight corruption within the distribution companies.

Once Nigerians consistently receive reliable electricity, resistance to paying appropriate tariffs will naturally reduce.

This is exactly what happened in telecommunications.

Nobody protests against buying data because people receive the service they paid for.

Electricity should follow the same model.

5. Political Will Matters More Than Political Promises

Experts have repeatedly identified what Nigeria needs:

- Massive investment in generation

- Stronger transmission infrastructure

- Better distribution networks

- Universal metering

- Reduced electricity theft

- Cost-reflective pricing implemented fairly

- Independent regulation

- Private-sector participation

None of these ideas are new.
The challenge has never been a lack of solutions. The challenge has always been implementing them consistently across several administrations.

The Bottom Line is that Nigeria's electricity challenge is difficult; but it is not impossible.

The telecom revolution proves that when government creates the right policies, encourages investment, and allows competition to thrive, transformational change can happen.

Stable electricity will not come through speeches alone.

Neither will it come through subsidies that bankrupt government.

It will come through bold reforms, honest regulation, private investment, modern infrastructure, effective metering, and a commitment to ensuring Nigerians receive value for what they pay.

If we could move from waiting years for a telephone line to carrying smartphones in our pockets within two decades, then we can also move from generators and darkness to reliable electricity.

The question is no longer whether Nigeria can achieve stable electricity.

The real question is whether we have the political courage and policy consistency to make it happen.

Conclusion: A One-Year Roadmap to 24/7 Electricity in Nigeria

Achieving uninterrupted electricity within one year is ambitious, but it is possible if a government treats it as a national emergency and implements reforms decisively. The foundation already exists; what is required is leadership, execution, and accountability.

A practical roadmap could look like this:

Month 1–2: Declare a National Power Emergency


- Set clear, measurable targets for generation, transmission, and distribution.

- Establish a high-level Power Delivery Task Force reporting directly to the President.

- Remove bureaucratic bottlenecks delaying critical projects.

Month 2–4: Unlock Private Investment.
- Encourage massive private investment in generation, transmission, and distribution.

- Guarantee investors a transparent regulatory environment and enforce existing contracts.

- Fast-track embedded generation and captive power projects for industries and states.

Month 3–6: Meter Every Paying Customer
- Launch an aggressive nationwide metering programme.

- Eliminate estimated billing.

- Use smart meters to reduce losses, improve billing accuracy, and restore consumer confidence.

Month 4–8: Strengthen the Distribution Network
- Upgrade transformers, feeders, substations, and distribution lines in high-demand areas.

- Replace obsolete equipment causing frequent outages.

- Hold Distribution Companies accountable through strict performance targets.

Month 5–9: Tackle Electricity Theft.

- Establish special courts for electricity-related offences.

- Deploy smart monitoring systems to detect illegal connections.

- Enforce penalties while encouraging voluntary compliance.

Month 6–10: Implement Fair, Cost-Reflective Tariffs

- Ensure consumers pay tariffs that reflect the true cost of electricity, while protecting the poorest households with targeted subsidies rather than blanket subsidies.

- Link tariff adjustments directly to measurable improvements in service delivery.

Month 8–12: Expand Generation and Transmission.

- Complete abandoned power projects.

- Improve gas supply to power plants.

- Integrate renewable energy into underserved rural communities.

- Maximize the use of existing generation capacity by removing transmission bottlenecks.



Finally, government must maintain constant communication with Nigerians. Citizens are more willing to support reforms when they understand the benefits and can see visible improvements in service. The telecom revolution succeeded because policies attracted investment, competition improved quality, and consumers received value for what they paid.

Nigeria's electricity sector can follow the same path. Stable 24/7 power is not beyond our reach. It demands bold policy choices, disciplined execution, private-sector participation, and sustained political commitment. If these steps are pursued with urgency and consistency, Nigeria can move from chronic power shortages to reliable electricity far sooner than many believe.

PastorKay is a Public Analyst and Social Commentator Based in Port Harcourt

IamPatriotic:
My prediction for the 2027 presidential election is that Tinubu will win, but he will not perform as strongly in the North West and North East as he did in 2023. However, he will make up for those losses with stronger performances in the North Central, South South, and South West.
Tinubu will perform better in the North East and North West than Atiku will in the South West and South South. He will also win the North Central.
Obi will, as usual, dominate the South East with about 98% of the vote. He will perform better than Atiku in the South South and the Christian-majority parts of the North Central. Nevertheless, he will still finish third overall.

The assumption that President Tinubu will offset losses in the North West and North East with gains elsewhere underestimates the importance of those regions. Together, they account for Nigeria's largest voting population, and if Atiku consolidates them, Tinubu's path becomes much narrower.

The addition of Rotimi Amaechi as Atiku's running mate could also significantly reshape the race. Amaechi brings strong political influence in the South South, national appeal, and a reputation as a formidable grassroots mobiliser. His presence could weaken Tinubu's expected gains in the South South while making the ticket more attractive across the North Central.

Even if Peter Obi dominates the South East, a strong Atiku–Amaechi ticket could remain competitive nationwide by combining overwhelming support in the North with improved performances in the South South and North Central. In a close election, that combination could prove decisive.

Building a Winning Coalition: Why Atiku and Amaechi Could Become Nigeria's Most Formidable Ticket in 2027

By PastorKay

As Nigeria gradually approaches the 2027 General Elections, political realignments, coalition talks, and strategic consultations have begun to dominate the national conversation. With economic challenges, security concerns, and growing public demand for effective leadership, many Nigerians are already looking ahead to what promises to be one of the most competitive elections in the nation's democratic history.

For former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, the path to victory may depend largely on his ability to build a broad-based coalition capable of attracting support across regional, religious, and political divides. While no election is won by a single individual, the choice of a running mate often sends a powerful message about a campaign's direction, priorities, and capacity for governance.

Among the names that have emerged in political discussions, former Rivers State Governor and former Minister of Transportation, Rotimi Chibuike Amaechi, stands out as a strong and strategic option. An Atiku-Amaechi ticket could potentially unite critical political forces and create one of the most formidable alliances ahead of 2027.

1. A Powerful North-South Partnership

Successful presidential tickets in Nigeria often reflect the country's geopolitical diversity. An alliance between Atiku Abubakar from the North-East and Rotimi Amaechi from the South-South would create a balanced ticket with national appeal and geographical spread.

Such a partnership would send a strong signal of inclusiveness and national unity at a time when many Nigerians are seeking leadership that transcends regional boundaries.

2. Uniting Opposition Forces Under One Banner

One of the greatest challenges facing opposition politics in Nigeria has been fragmentation. Multiple candidates often divide votes that could otherwise be consolidated.

Amaechi's political influence and relationships across different political blocs could help strengthen coalition-building efforts, attract key stakeholders, and unite various groups behind a common objective.

3. Amaechi's Strong Political Base in the South-South

The South-South remains one of Nigeria's most politically significant regions. Having served as Governor of Rivers State for eight years, Amaechi commands considerable influence and possesses a well-established political network that could prove invaluable during a nationwide campaign.

His presence on the ticket could enhance voter mobilization across the Niger Delta and surrounding regions.

4. A Combination of Experience and Competence

Both Atiku and Amaechi possess decades of public service experience. Atiku's background in governance and economic matters complements Amaechi's record in state administration and infrastructure development.

Together, they would present voters with a ticket built on experience, institutional knowledge, and administrative capacity.

5. Strong Grassroots Mobilization Capacity

Elections are not won solely through media campaigns; they are won through grassroots engagement.

Amaechi has demonstrated an ability to connect with local political structures, community leaders, and grassroots supporters. His organizational strength could significantly enhance the effectiveness of a national campaign.

6. Expanding Electoral Reach Beyond Traditional Strongholds

For Atiku to improve his chances in 2027, he must expand beyond his traditional support base.

Amaechi's influence across southern Nigeria and his relationships with political actors nationwide could help broaden the ticket's appeal and attract undecided voters seeking a credible alternative.

7. A Record of Leadership and Public Service

Throughout his political journey, Amaechi has served as Speaker of the Rivers State House of Assembly, Governor, Chairman of the Nigeria Governors' Forum, and Minister of Transportation.

This extensive record provides a foundation upon which voters can evaluate his leadership credentials and governance experience.

8. National Visibility and Political Recognition

One advantage of selecting a nationally recognized running mate is immediate public familiarity.

Amaechi is a household name across Nigeria. His years in public service have given him visibility and recognition that would strengthen the profile of any presidential ticket.

9. The Ability to Energize the Campaign

Political campaigns require energy, resilience, and relentless engagement.

Amaechi has built a reputation as an active and effective campaigner who understands the demands of nationwide political contests. His presence could inject momentum into the campaign and strengthen outreach efforts.

10. Offering Nigerians a Credible Alternative

Ultimately, elections are about choices.

If Nigerians are looking for an alternative vision for governance, an Atiku-Amaechi ticket could present itself as a combination of experience, regional balance, political strength, and administrative competence.

Such a coalition would be positioned to engage voters on issues of economic recovery, job creation, national unity, infrastructure development, and institutional reform.

Conclusion

As political calculations ahead of 2027 continue to evolve, one reality remains clear: victory will likely depend on coalition-building, strategic partnerships, and the ability to unite diverse constituencies under a common vision.

An Atiku-Amaechi ticket would bring together two experienced political figures with extensive networks, governance credentials, and national recognition. Whether such an alliance eventually materializes remains to be seen, but there is little doubt that it would immediately become one of the most formidable political combinations in the race for Nigeria's highest office.

In a country as diverse and complex as Nigeria, building a winning coalition may ultimately be the key to electoral success. The partnership between Atiku Abubakar and Rotimi Amaechi could represent precisely that kind of coalition.

PastorKay is a Public Commentator and Social Analyst

They will file an appeal...

Mourner-in-Chief

I need more words to complete what is needed to make a response

The development was disclosed by the Executive Mayor of the City of Tshwane, Dr. Nasiphi Moya, in a post on X.

The city of Tshwane in South Africa disconnected electricity supply to the High Commission of the Federal Republic of Nigeria over unpaid utility bills, before later restoring power after the debt was settled.

The development was disclosed by the Executive Mayor of the City of Tshwane, Dr. Nasiphi Moya, in a post on X.

https://saharareporters.com/2026/02/02/south-africa-disconnects-power-supply-nigerian-high-commission-over-unpaid-bills

The Looming Catastrophe: Why Millions of Nigerians Risk Losing Their Money, Businesses, Homes, and Lives – Leading to the Worst Humanitarian Crisis in History Over the Next 25 Years

By PastorKay[i][/i]

When I saw this challenge – "Best answer wins 100k" – calling for a deep, honest explanation of why so many Nigerians stand to lose everything in the coming decades, I knew I had to take the time to respond properly. This isn't about quick hot takes or surface-level complaints; it's about connecting the dots between today's harsh realities and the projected trajectory through 2050.
The stakes are existential: widespread financial ruin, mass displacement, business collapse, skyrocketing deaths from hunger and violence, and a humanitarian disaster on a scale that could eclipse any in recorded history due to Nigeria's massive population and interconnected crises. Drawing from the latest 2026 reports, expert projections, and on-the-ground trends, here's a clear-eyed analysis of why this isn't hyperbole—it's a converging storm.

1. The Immediate Hunger and Food Security Cliff in 2026 – A Preview of Worse to Come:

Right now, in early 2026, Nigeria is staring down what the UN World Food Programme (WFP) describes as potentially the country's worst hunger crisis in modern history. Funding shortfalls mean WFP assistance could end by December 2025 levels into 2026, leaving up to 35 million people facing severe food insecurity – the highest number ever recorded. In the northeast (Borno, Adamawa, Yobe), around 15,000 people are already projected to face famine-like conditions (IPC Phase 5), with child malnutrition at critical levels in multiple states.
This isn't isolated: Conflict disrupts farming, kidnappings and banditry force farmers to abandon fields, and climate shocks like 2025 floods destroyed over 1.6 million hectares of farmland. High input costs (fertilizer up 19.5% to ₦52,000 per bag) and fuel prices mean even fewer farmers plant, leading to below-average harvests. The result? Acute food insecurity could hit 34.7 million in 2026 alone, per recent analyses. Families will deplete savings just to eat, small traders and agribusinesses will collapse from lack of supply and demand, and malnutrition will claim lives – especially among children.
This 2026 snapshot foreshadows the longer-term spiral: Without reversal, hunger escalates as population grows and resources shrink.

2. Population Boom Overwhelming Everything – From 230+ Million Today to ~400 Million by 2050

Nigeria's population is exploding faster than almost anywhere else. UN and World Bank projections show it reaching around 400 million by 2050, with urban areas alone swelling to 264 million (70% urbanization). That's an additional 140 million urban dwellers in just 25 years – more than double today's urban population.
This demographic pressure crushes infrastructure: Housing shortages lead to slum expansion and evictions; water and sanitation systems fail, breeding disease; schools and hospitals overflow. Job creation can't keep pace – Nigeria needs millions of new positions yearly for its youth bulge, but unemployment and underemployment stay high. Wealth concentrates in tiny elites (e.g., only ~5% with significant bank balances), starving the broader economy of circulating money. Businesses catering to the masses struggle as purchasing power erodes, while the few rich can't sustain broad demand.
The outcome: Widespread poverty deepens (already projected toward 62% in some scenarios), savings vanish, homes are lost to inability to pay rent or mortgages, and informal enterprises fold. This isn't abstract – it's families selling assets, businesses shuttering, and migration turning desperate.

3. Climate Change as a Multiplier of Destruction:

Rising temperatures (potentially 2.9–5.7°C by 2100 in high-emissions paths), erratic rains, droughts in the north, floods in the south, and sea-level rise (threatening Lagos with meters of water by 2050) will devastate agriculture – the backbone for 70% of jobs. Crop yields could drop sharply, food imports soar (already eating 17% of forex), and prices skyrocket (food inflation lingering high).
Internal climate migration could displace 9.4 million by 2050 in pessimistic scenarios, overwhelming cities and sparking resource fights. Homes wash away in floods, farms turn to desert, businesses reliant on local supply chains fail. Economic losses from inaction could reach billions annually, wiping out household wealth and national growth potential.

4. Insecurity Fueling a Vicious Cycle:

Insurgencies (Boko Haram/ISWAP), banditry, farmer-herder clashes, and emerging threats from Sahel groups displace millions yearly. In 2025–2026, attacks surged, civilian deaths hit highs, and displacement continued in the tens of thousands. This disrupts everything: Farms abandoned, markets unsafe, transport costs explode. By mid-century, population-resource pressures intensify conflicts, potentially leading to far higher fatalities and destruction. Businesses face extortion or raids, properties get looted or burned, lives are lost directly or indirectly through blocked aid and services.

5. Economic Fragility – Oil Dependency, Debt, and Policy Traps:

Despite modest growth projections (4.4–5.5% in 2026 from World Bank/NESG), structural issues persist: Oil reliance exposes Nigeria to global shifts; debt servicing swallows budgets; inflation erodes value. The "borrow to live" cycle mirrors household realities – government and citizens alike trap in debt repayment over investment.
Without massive diversification, job creation, and inclusive growth (as outlined in Agenda 2050 ambitions), poverty entrenches. Small businesses – the economy's spine – collapse under costs, insecurity, and weak demand, leading to mass financial losses.
The Cumulative Horror: Why This Could Be History's Worst Humanitarian Crisis
These aren't separate issues – they feed each other. Hunger weakens bodies and economies → insecurity worsens → climate hits harder → population strains break systems. By 2050, Nigeria could face tens of millions in chronic crisis, mass starvation, disease outbreaks, mega-displacements, and conflict deaths on a scale dwarfing past famines or wars – simply because of sheer numbers (400 million people in fragility).
Absolute numbers matter: Even if percentages aren't the absolute worst, the raw human toll – millions losing homes/businesses/lives – could outstrip historical benchmarks.
This isn't inevitable. Agenda 2050, security reforms, climate adaptation, population policies, and fairer wealth distribution could pivot the path. But time is short, and 2026's hunger cliff shows how fast things deteriorate without action.

Conclusion:

The Path Forward – Act Now or Lose Everything:

Writing this stark warning without solutions would be pointless. The projected losses of money, businesses, homes, and lives are not inevitable. Nigeria has roadmaps: This Government can adopt this and call it Agenda 2050, the Renewed Hope Development Plan (2026–2030),

Don't forget; The difference between catastrophe and turnaround lies in urgent, serious implementation starting in 2026.

Key actions needed immediately:

1. Stop the 2026 Hunger Crisis:

Scale emergency food aid, cash transfers, agricultural inputs, and nutrition programs in the worst-hit states (northeast, northwest, north-central). Reduce post-harvest losses and secure farmer access to land.

2. Diversify the Economy Fast:

Push agriculture, manufacturing, digital services, renewables, and SMEs with affordable credit, infrastructure, and tax/investment reforms to create millions of jobs and reduce oil dependence.

3. Build Climate Resilience:

Accelerate flood defenses, drought-resistant farming, coastal protection (especially Lagos), and renewable energy rollout. Integrate climate-smart practices into agriculture and urban planning.

4. Restore Security:

Strengthen community policing, target banditry and insurgency decisively, address farmer-herder conflicts through dialogue and land access reforms, and link security to resource management.

5. Manage Population & Invest in People:

Expand education (especially for girls), family planning, healthcare, and youth skills training to slow growth pressures and turn the youth bulge into an asset.

6. Mobilize Funding & Accountability:

Improve domestic revenue, attract private and green investment, secure international support, and enforce transparent monitoring so plans don’t remain on paper.

If leaders, citizens, businesses, and partners commit to these priorities with real political will and funding, Nigeria can avoid the worst humanitarian disaster in history. Poverty can fall sharply, hunger can be prevented, businesses can thrive, homes can be protected, and millions of lives can be saved.

The next 25 years do not have to be defined by collapse. They can mark the moment Nigeria finally rises to its potential—but only if decisive action begins right now.

The choice is clear. Nigerians must demand—and leaders must deliver—a future worth living in.

I wrote this not for the 100k prize alone, but because the truth needs saying loudly. Nigerians deserve better than denial. The crisis is building – ignoring it costs everything.

#PastorKay is a Social Activist & Political Commentator.

Mankind2024:
Why Captain Ibrahim Traoré Is Playing with Fire by Detaining Nigerian Soldiers
Many people underestimate the capabilities of the Nigerian military and what it could mean for the government of Burkina Faso under Captain Ibrahim Traoré.

Don't be misled by Nigeria's ongoing internal security challenges—fighting Fulani herdsmen clashes, kidnappers, bandits, and jihadist insurgents in the North, or separatist agitation in the East involving IPOB and unknown gunmen. These are asymmetric insurgencies, complicated by local sympathies and complex socio-political dynamics that make total eradication difficult without massive collateral impact. No advanced military in the world easily wins such protracted internal wars.

In stark contrast, a direct confrontation with Burkina Faso would be conventional (symmetric) warfare. The Nigerian Armed Forces—Africa's largest by personnel, with superior airpower, logistics, and combat experience—have the overwhelming potential to overrun Burkina Faso's smaller military and, if provoked far enough, enforce regime change in Ouagadougou.

Dismiss any notion that Russia's support for Traoré would deter this. Nigeria could establish theater commands in neighboring countries like Ghana, Côte d'Ivoire, Benin, and Togo for a multi-front operation, [color=#006600][/color]leveraging regional alliances and superior resources.

This detention risks escalating a diplomatic incident into something far more dangerous. Traoré's supporters—often vocal online pan-Africanists and certain political factions—may cheer the bravado now, but they would have plenty to lament if things spiral out of control.

So Bukina Faso don't have allies..? And what makes you think those countries you are calling will support Nigeria to fight another African country. Tell your President to drop ego and put a call through to Troure and get this issue sorted out in seconds.

Bandits Boldly Flaunt Bundles Of Naira They Got From Ransom. Pictures

trutharena:
Pastor Kay, you don drop some serious reasoning wey go make Bwala think am over

The man is a mess

WHY DANIEL BWALA MUST RESIGN — NIGERIA CANNOT BE LED BY EXCUSES

Opinion:

By PastorKay

Daniel Bwala’s recent remarks about the government’s inability to track terrorists flaunting ransom money and weapons online is more than a slip of the tongue—it is an indictment of the Tinubu administration’s approach to national security and public accountability. At a time when Nigerians are being kidnapped daily, when families are forced to sell land and property to pay ransoms, and when communities live in fear of bandits and extremists, the least the Presidency owes the nation is a sense of direction. Instead, Bwala delivered a public confession of confusion and helplessness.

In his interview, he boldly claimed that terrorists cannot be tracked because they use Starlink and other foreign network providers that “are not registered in Nigeria.” Yet the same government moves with lightning speed to arrest critics, activists, journalists, and even comedians who speak against its policies. This contradiction is unacceptable. It is shameful. And it is enough reason for Bwala to tender his resignation.

Below are five expanded reasons why Daniel Bwala must step down immediately:


1. He Publicly Admitted Government Helplessness—A Security Disaster

Bwala did not merely explain a challenge; he broadcasted to the entire world that Nigeria is incapable of tracking terrorists.
This is a catastrophic PR failure. Terrorist groups thrive on perception.
When a presidential spokesperson announces that the government is blind and powerless whenever criminals switch to a different internet provider, he strengthens criminal confidence and weakens national morale.
No responsible government official should make such a reckless declaration. This alone is enough reason for him to resign.

2. He Exposed the Double Standard in Law Enforcement

Nigerians have long questioned why the government is quick to arrest peaceful protesters, online critics, and political opponents, yet struggles to apprehend terrorists who openly show their faces while flaunting ransom money. Instead of addressing this hypocrisy, Bwala attempted to justify it with a weak technological excuse.
His explanation confirms what Nigerians already suspect: The government prioritises silencing dissent over dismantling terrorism.
A spokesperson who appears to rationalize injustice cannot occupy such a sensitive position.

3. He Damaged Nigeria’s International Reputation

Countries around the world rely on counter-terror surveillance technologies—satellite tracking, signal interception, cyber-intelligence, cross-border cooperation, and digital footprints. By claiming that Nigeria cannot track terrorists using Starlink because it is “in the space,” Bwala portrayed the country as one lacking even basic intelligence capacity. This kind of statement: discourages foreign investors, embarrasses the security institutions, and makes the nation look weak to both allies and enemies. No modern nation can afford a spokesperson who speaks recklessly about national vulnerabilities on international platforms.

4. He Offered Excuses Instead of Strategies

Leadership requires: solutions, roadmaps, improved intelligence strategies, regional collaboration, cyber-monitoring development, and proactive policy direction. But Bwala provided none. He did not offer a single step the government intends to take to solve the problem he described. All he did was point fingers at an internet provider, as though Starlink were the mastermind of terrorism in Nigeria. A spokesperson who cannot articulate solutions contributes to Nigeria’s insecurity.
He must resign for gross incompetence.

5. He Spread False Information to the Public

This is perhaps the most damaging of all. Starlink is registered and licensed by the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC). The Nigerian government itself announced its approval in 2023. Claiming that Starlink is “not registered in Nigeria” is factually incorrect, misleading, and dangerous—especially when discussing national security. A presidential spokesperson must be informed and accurate.
Providing wrong information on an issue as sensitive as terrorism is enough proof that he is not fit for the job. If a spokesperson misinforms the nation, he becomes a liability, not an asset.

FINAL CONCLUSION: NIGERIA DESERVES BETTER

National security communication requires: intelligence, discipline, accuracy, strategic awareness, and professionalism. Daniel Bwala’s statement failed in all five areas. A presidency that demands respect must first respect the citizens. And one of the first steps toward restoring that respect is removing or accepting the resignation of a spokesperson who has demonstrated: poor judgment, misinformation, carelessness, unpreparedness, and a dangerous disregard for national image.

Daniel Bwala must resign.
Not because of politics, but because Nigeria deserves a spokesperson who understands that every word from that office affects the nation’s security, credibility, and stability. Silence from the Presidency would only mean endorsement of incompetence.

PastorKay is a Social Activist and Political Commentator.

ALLNIGERIANSMAD:
and if you see two senior fuulish police officers parading alongside with the mascurade during arrest taking selfies like they've achieved milestones

See them...

Crinkum crankum 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Crinkum crankum 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Crinkum crankum 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Crinkum crankum 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Flangelo12:
I no talk am?

I said he did nothing wrong.

We say it as it is.

Do some masquerade dance for us, joor.

😁😄😄😄😃😃😁🤣🤣🤣🤣

University of UYO hold it's inaugural lecture on "CANDELABRUM AND CRINKUM-CRANKUM..!"

Iagos:
Wow, the Governor would be embarrased

Sure

greatiyk4u:
Just imagine, of all the problems in Nigeria, masquerade arrest be their problem , however, the costume of the masquerade is not encouraging morality

Na waooooo

festacman:
The fact is that here is no religious persecution in Nigeria. As I write this on Sunday morning, there are Christian worship places in major Northern cities and even rural areas active and bustling with praise and worship of God Almighty in the name of Jesus.

However the truth is that minority ethnic groups in Northern Nigeria who are largely Christians are oppressed by majority Fulani/Hausa ethnic group who are Muslims using their political power, population and religion as tools of oppression. So, Christians in the North are targeted, oppressed and often killed but it is NOT genocide or stictly religious driven. Interestingly, the same highly crafty Fulani also subtly oppress Hausa. So, yes there is majority oppression of the minority in Northern Nigeria and successive governments have avoided discussing it for electoral reasons and fear of being overthrown by Fulani officers.

Interestingly, in the same Benue State all democratically elected former governors have been UNFAIRLY Tiv ethnic group using their population and all cries by Idoma people and other smaller groups have been neglected. Another majority oppressing minority.

Incidentally, Bishop Kukah is a minority from Ikulu (Bakulu) ethnic group in Zagon Kataf local government area of Southern Zaria of Kaduna State. He grew up a Christian and today he is a Bishop of Sokoto all Northern Nigeria.

Quite on point 👉👉

thisisit:
JUDAS ISCARIOT BETRAYED JESUS FOR 25 PIECES OF SILVER

BISHOP KUKAH BETRAYED CHRISTIANS FOR N25 BILLION

FOR A MEAGRE 25B, KUKAH IS ASSERTING THAT CATHOLICS AND CHRISTIANS ARE NOT THE SAME

25 Billion..? From where..? This is serious..!

Mjshexy:
It's shameful for Kukah to have spoken those lies, how can you in clear conscience sell your soul at the expense of your fellow worshippers whom you stand to lead. It's really disappointing

I agree with you

I DISAGREE WITH BISHOP KUKAH: WhY BISHOP KUKAH'S DENIAL OF CHRISTIAN GenocideY/PERSECUTION MUST BE CHALLENGED.

By Prophet Kingsley Asian.

There are moments in a nation’s history when silence becomes complicity, and when downplaying suffering becomes a betrayal. Bishop Matthew Kukah of The Kukah Centre KUKAH is a respected figure, a cleric of deep intellect and national influence. But on the issue of Christian genocide and persecution in Nigeria, his recent remarks demand a strong, unapologetic response — and a public challenge.

Not out of disrespect, but out of loyalty to truth, justice, and the blood of innocent Nigerians whose cries cannot be negotiated away in the interest of diplomacy.

This is not an emotional debate. It is a matter of life, death, and national conscience. And here is why many of us must boldly and publicly disagree with Bishop Kukah — and why I challenge him to an open, public debate to defend his claims if he believes they can stand the weight of evidence.

1. GLOBAL DATA CANNOT ALL BE WRONG AT THE SAME TIME

For over 10 years, international watchdogs like Open Doors, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the Global Terrorism Index have consistently ranked Nigeria among the deadliest nations for Christians. These independent bodies do not collude, do not share ideology, and gain nothing from exaggeration. When multiple global monitors confirm the same reality year after year, dismissing them becomes intellectual dishonesty. This alone is enough reason for Bishop Kukah to meet Nigerians publicly and defend his position.

2. THE MASSACRES IN CHRISTIAN COMMUNITIES ARE TOO FREQUENT TO DENY

From Plateau to Benue, Southern Kaduna to Taraba, the patterns are painfully clear:
Deliberate, sustained attacks targeting Christian-majority regions. Villages burnt. Churches razed. Families slaughtered. Communities emptied. This is not a misunderstanding. It is targeted violence based on identity — and it deserves more than diplomatic downplaying.

3. THE ATTACKERS THEMSELVES CONFESS RELIGIOUS INTENT

Boko Haram, ISWAP, and certain militia groups repeatedly declare their mission openly in videos, manifestos, and interrogations:
Eliminate Christians and non-aligned Muslims.
If the killers themselves boldly state their religious motives, it becomes dangerous for us to pretend otherwise.

Let Bishop Kukah publicly debate this point and show us the evidence that contradicts the perpetrators’ own confessions.

4. PERSECUTION IS NOT MEASURED BY HOW MANY CHRISTIANS ARE RICH OR EDUCATED

Bishop Kukah argues that Christians dominate education and the economy. Even if it were true, prosperity has NEVER neutralized persecutions. The Israelites prospered in Egypt — yet were oppressed. Early Christians were educated — yet were slaughtered. Rwanda was highly educated — yet genocide happened.
Persecution is about vulnerability, not prosperity.

5. ELITE PRIVILEGE SHOULD NOT BE USED TO ERASE GRASSROOTS SUFFERING.

Christians in government or business do not reflect the reality of villagers murdered on their farms. Using elite privilege to dismiss rural pain is morally dangerous. The blood being shed is not the blood of the elite — it is the blood of the forgotten. Come on Bishop, Let’s debate this openly.

6. THE CHURCH HAS BURIED TOO MANY VICTIMS TO BE SILENCED.

We have seen: Mass burials, Pastors beheaded, Churches bombed, Schoolgirls kidnapped, Families exterminated, Children killed for carrying a Bible. These are not rumors. There are graves. No amount of diplomacy can wash that away.

7. FEAR IS ALREADY A FORM OF PERSECUTION.

In parts of Northern Nigeria; Christians cannot openly build churches, Night vigils are dangerous, Pastors operate under threat and Converts hide their faith to survive. Fear itself is persecution — even before the bullets come.

8. THE VATICAN’S DIPLOMATIC SILENCE IS NOT A DENIAL OF REALITY.

The Vatican avoids certain labels for geopolitical reasons. Diplomacy is not evidence. And it must never be weaponized to silence the truth of those who are dying.

9. DENYING PERSECUTION EMPOWERS THE ENEMIES OF PEACE.

When respected voices like that of Bishop Kukah Bishop Mathew Hassan Kukah downplay religious violence; Perpetrators feel protected, Victims feel abandoned, International partners become confused and with this, Silence becomes a shield for aggressors. This is why a public debate is necessary — the nation deserves clarity.

10. WE OWE THE DEAD THE TRUTH

Every slain pastor, every abducted child, every burnt church, every wiped-out village — we owe them acknowledgment. To deny their suffering is to kill them twice: First physically, then morally.

CONCLUSION: I TOTALLY DISAGREE WITH my lord Bishop and this is TO DEFEND THE FUTURE — This disagreement is not rebellion. It is responsibility. Nigeria cannot solve a problem her leaders refuse to name.

Christian persecution and genocide is real.
It is documented.
It is increasing.
And it demands honest confrontation — not diplomatic minimization.

I publicly challenge @theKukah to an open National debate on this issue.
Let him present his facts. I will also present facts backed with verifiable figures
Let Nigerians judge and Let truth prevail.

Until we call things by their true names, peace will remain a dream and justice will remain a rumor.

Prophet Kingsley Asian is a Port Harcourt Based Preacher & Social Activist.

Lumarstone:
Too much AC iin that room might be the course.

Nigeria is in autopilot.

I agree with you on this.

SisterAnn:
The American guy wasted a good opportunity to put Omojuwa in his place.

Exactly 💯

SeverusSnape:
Funny, A "fatherland" that has been cursed from time immemorial.
A "fatherland" where terrorists run amok and is a terrorists' haven. Mtcheeww

Tell him again

simpleseyi:
Cho Cho Cho.

Only a bastard will be happy and laughing when his father’s land is being debased and rubbished

It's not about claiming a fatherland that you can't be alive to be proud of... It's about wasting and opportunity to get the fatherland working and well secured. A dead man doesn't have any fatherland to lay claim on.

When Nigeria Needed a Voice, He Chose Sentiment: A Rebuttal to J J Omojuwa’s Misguided Submission

Opinion:

By Pastor Kay,

I ran into that trending video and decided to sit down and actually listen to the young Nigerian who had the rare opportunity to speak on such a global platform. But instead of using that moment to challenge power, spotlight real insecurity, or confront the Nigerian leaders who have failed this nation, he wasted the opportunity on ethnicity and sentimental rambling — probably because he shares the same region as the President.

Rather than addressing the structural issues destroying Nigeria, he went on a frolic about what Donald Trump called Nigeria and what he didn’t call Nigeria, as though name-calling is the reason our security architecture collapsed. While Nigerians are facing mass abductions, hunger, unemployment, and systemic corruption, he reduced the entire conversation to emotional semantics instead of confronting the government that should be fixing the mess.

And that is exactly why his position must be challenged sharply.

Now Here are 5 REASONS I DISAGREE WITH OMOJUWA’S POSITION

1. He Confuses Correlation With Causation

He tried to link Trump’s comments to the rise in terrorism — a claim with zero evidence. Terrorism in Nigeria has existed for more than a decade. This is the same country where over 200 people were slaughtered in one night and the killers are still free. Was it Trump that caused that? Was it Trump that collapsed our intelligence? Was it Trump that failed to secure our borders?

The real enemy is internal failure, not external statements. On this premise, His argument collapses completely.

2. He Blames Trump for Weapon Restrictions That Started Before Trump

The refusal to sell weapons to Nigeria started long before Trump — during Obama’s administration under the Leahy Law. Ironically, Trump approved the Super Tucano jets Nigeria had spent years requesting. So the timeline, the facts, and the history are against him.
His claim falls flat.

3. He Fixates on Trump’s Language Instead of Nigeria’s Failures

He is angry that Trump insulted Nigeria — but Trump called Nigeria a “shithole” during his first tenure and returned years later to repeat the same insult. As a Nigerian, the real question is: what exactly has changed in our governance, security, or economy to merit any commendation from Trump?
Nothing. Our leaders have not improved anything. And while he fixates on vocabulary, Nigerians live through: Mass poverty, insecurity, Corruption, Collapsing institutions and Endless kidnappings.

4. Focusing on Trump’s wording is emotional misplacement. His point is irrelevant.

America Has the Right to Criticize — and Nigeria Needs Honest Critique International politics is brutally honest. Superpowers speak plainly. If Nigeria does not want to be called failing, Nigeria must stop failing. Diplomacy is good, but truth does not require a permission slip. Expecting America to sugarcoat Nigeria’s crisis is unrealistic. His reasoning does not stand.

5. He Portrays Nigeria as a Helpless Victim Instead of a Sovereign Nation

His narrative paints Nigeria as weak and dependent, waiting for America’s validation. But Nigeria is a sovereign state with manpower, money, and resources.
The failure to utilize them is the fault of Nigerian leaders — not Trump. Blaming America for our internal rot is intellectual laziness. His conclusion is completely misguided.

At a time when Nigerians are being kidnapped daily, when families are grieving, when hunger is rising, when over 200 people were massacred in one night without a single arrest, Nigeria needs strong voices on global platforms — not emotional distractions.

For a Nigerian to climb onto an international stage and waste the moment debating what Trump said or didn’t say is a tragic misuse of a rare opportunity.
It does not help the victims.
It does not hold our leaders accountable.
It does not move the conversation forward.

In a moment when we should be demanding action, policy, justice, and accountability, reducing Nigeria’s crisis to semantics is irresponsible and unproductive.

I completely disagree with his submission, and such a shallow, sentimental argument has no place on an international platform at this critical time in our nation’s history.

PastorKay is a Social Activist and Political Commentator