₦airaland Forum

Let's not argue blindly. Labour leaders of nowadays. What a pity.

RE: FESTUS OSIFO, TUC PRESIDENT, AND THE QUESTION OF SUBSIDY REMOVAL.

By PastorKay

With due respect to the President of the Trade Union Congress, Festus Osifo, his question about funding workers' salaries, the military, the police, roads, hospitals and other public services deserves an answer.

But I have a question for him in return:

Must Nigerians continue to endure unbearable economic hardship simply because successive governments claim that making fuel affordable is too expensive?

Nobody is suggesting that Nigeria should abandon its financial obligations. Nobody is arguing that workers should go unpaid, the military should be starved of funds, or hospitals and roads should be neglected.

The real question is whether Nigeria can design a subsidy policy that protects ordinary citizens, supports domestic production and preserves government revenue.

Atiku Abubakar's proposed production subsidy offers a framework worth examining. Instead of returning to the old system of subsidising imported petroleum products, his proposal would direct support towards qualifying refineries operating in Nigeria, with the aim of lowering production costs and passing the benefits to consumers.

Here are FIVE STRONG WAYS ATIKU'S PROPOSED SUBSIDY POLICY CAN WORK.

1. SUBSIDISE DOMESTIC PRODUCTION, NOT FOREIGN IMPORTATION.

One of the biggest problems with the old subsidy arrangement was the opportunity for fraud, inflated import claims, diversion and abuse.

Atiku's proposed alternative is to shift government support from imported fuel to petroleum products refined in Nigeria.

How can this work?

The government could supply crude oil to qualifying Nigerian refineries at an approved preferential price. In return, those refineries would have to demonstrate how the reduced cost of crude translates into lower production costs and measurable benefits for Nigerian consumers.

The programme would be open to eligible refineries under clear rules, rather than being designed to benefit a single company or politically connected individuals.

This would help Nigeria retain more refining activity within its borders, support domestic investment, create employment and reduce dependence on imported petroleum products.

However, a discounted crude price alone does not guarantee cheaper petrol. The government must require verifiable consumer benefits and ensure that refiners do not simply retain the discount as additional profit.

The objective is simple: Nigerian crude should contribute to Nigerian prosperity, Nigerian jobs and more affordable energy for Nigerians.

That is the central distinction between Atiku's proposed production subsidy and the old import-based arrangement.

2. ESTABLISH A STRICT SUBSIDY BUDGET AND A TRANSPARENT SOURCE OF FUNDING.

This is where Festus Osifo's concern about government finances must be addressed directly.

Yes, the government needs money to pay salaries, finance security, build roads and maintain hospitals. Any responsible subsidy proposal must account for these obligations.

Atiku's proposed model recognises the need for a fixed spending limit, explicit budgetary provision and independent audits.

How can it work?

First, the government should calculate the cost of the proposed intervention before implementation.

Second, the National Assembly should approve an annual subsidy ceiling, supported by a transparent financing plan.

Third, the government should disclose how much support is provided per eligible barrel, how much crude is covered and how much the programme costs each month.

Fourth, the programme should be reviewed periodically to ensure that its cost remains affordable.

Finally, the government must publish the actual expenditure and the benefits delivered to consumers.

If the approved limit is reached, additional support must not be granted secretly or through unauthorised deductions from public revenue.

A subsidy without financial discipline can destroy an economy. But a carefully costed intervention designed to protect consumers need not be treated as an economic impossibility.

The question is not whether government spending has limits. It does. The question is how those limited resources can be deployed to achieve the greatest public benefit.

3. ACCOUNT FOR PUBLIC REVENUE AND CUT WASTEFUL EXPENDITURE.

If the government argues that Nigeria cannot afford targeted fuel relief, Nigerians are entitled to ask how public revenue is being collected, distributed and spent.

According to the Federal Government's own published figures, estimated subsidy savings across the federation amounted to ₦15.8 trillion between June 2023 and December 2025. The government reported that approximately ₦5.43 trillion accrued to the Federal Government, while the states and local governments received their respective shares through the Federation Account. These figures do not represent a single pool of cash sitting in the Federal Government's account.

That distinction matters.

It would be misleading to claim that the entire ₦15.8 trillion is available for the Federal Government to spend on fuel subsidies.

Nevertheless, the figures raise important questions about how the additional resources available to the different tiers of government have improved the lives of citizens.

A responsible administration should publish clear accounts of petroleum-related revenues, deductions, transfers and subsidy-related expenditure.

It should also review wasteful expenditure, improve procurement, tackle revenue leakages, strengthen tax administration and recover public funds established through due process to have been fraudulently diverted.

Savings from these measures could help create fiscal room for targeted relief, although the amount available would have to be independently established.

The Federal Government must also negotiate transparently with states and local governments where a policy affects revenue distributed through the Federation Account.

The argument should not be that every naira saved from subsidy removal must be returned to fuel subsidy. The argument is that every naira of public revenue must be accounted for, and government must demonstrate that its economic policies are delivering tangible benefits.

If a subsidy intervention is affordable after proper costing and expenditure reforms, why should it be rejected before its merits are fully examined?

4. PROTECT ORDINARY CITIZENS THROUGH LOWER FUEL, TRANSPORT AND FOOD COSTS.

Fuel is not just another commodity in Nigeria. Its price affects the cost of moving people, transporting food, operating generators, running businesses and distributing essential goods.

When petrol prices rise sharply, commercial transport operators face higher operating costs. Farmers and traders may pay more to move produce to markets. Manufacturers may face higher logistics and energy expenses.

These costs can eventually be passed on to consumers.

That is why the debate about fuel subsidy is also a debate about the cost of living.

Atiku has argued that his proposed intervention should help reduce energy and transport costs, support domestic production and restore purchasing power.

How can the government ensure that Nigerians actually benefit?

It should establish a transparent formula for calculating the support provided to participating refineries and require evidence that the benefit reaches the domestic market.

It should monitor the prices of refined products, transportation costs and other relevant indicators before and after implementation.

Where necessary, targeted transport support could be considered for public transport operators who agree to verifiable service and fare conditions.

Government should also monitor food distribution costs and ensure that relief programmes reach vulnerable households rather than becoming another channel for political patronage.

The aim is not merely to announce a lower petrol price. It is to achieve measurable reductions in the cost of living.

What is the point of celebrating higher government revenue if ordinary Nigerians cannot afford transportation, food and other basic necessities?

A sound economic policy must consider both the government's financial position and the purchasing power of the people.

5. MAKE THE POLICY TEMPORARY, AUDITABLE AND SUBJECT TO STRICT PERFORMANCE TESTS.

The most serious objection to subsidy is not that government must never intervene in the economy. It is that poorly designed interventions can become expensive, permanent and vulnerable to corruption.

Atiku's proposed production subsidy can only succeed if it avoids these dangers.

How can that be achieved?

Every participating refinery should have its crude allocation, refinery intake, production volumes, inventories and domestic product deliveries independently verified.

The government should publish the quantities covered by the scheme, the cost of the intervention, the identity of participating beneficiaries and the measured benefits delivered to consumers, subject to legitimate commercial and security considerations.

There should be no payment for unverified production, no subsidy for products that do not qualify and no preferential allocation without enforceable conditions.

Independent auditors should examine the programme, while the National Assembly should exercise its oversight responsibilities.

The policy should also have a scheduled review and a clear exit strategy.

If domestic refining becomes more competitive, production costs fall and consumers can obtain fuel at sustainable prices without government assistance, the subsidy should be reduced progressively and eventually phased out.

If the programme fails to lower consumer prices or its fiscal costs become excessive, it should be redesigned or suspended.

The goal must be affordable fuel today without creating another unsustainable financial burden for tomorrow.

That is how a government can protect consumers while maintaining the financial discipline necessary to fund workers' salaries, national security, roads, hospitals and other public services.

---

MY RESPONSE TO FESTUS OSIFO

Festus Osifo is right to ask how government will fund its obligations. That question should never be dismissed.

But the same standard of accountability must apply to every economic policy.

If government says subsidy removal is necessary to finance public services, it must also demonstrate how the resulting fiscal benefits are being used, how public expenditure is being controlled and how the welfare of ordinary citizens is improving.

Equally, Atiku must show Nigerians the precise cost of his proposed intervention, its financing source, its legal framework and the safeguards that will guarantee lower consumer prices.

His proposal must stand on transparent figures and a credible implementation plan, not political promises alone.

There is also an important legal question to resolve: Nigeria's Petroleum Industry Act provides for market-determined petroleum prices, so the administration would need to explain how the proposed support could operate within the law and whether any legal changes would be necessary.

These are legitimate questions. They deserve detailed answers rather than political slogans.

But we must reject the false choice that Nigeria must either allow fuel costs to impose severe hardship on citizens or abandon its responsibility to provide essential public services.

A properly designed, transparently funded and strictly monitored production subsidy is one possible approach. Whether it is the best approach must be determined by the evidence, the actual cost and the benefits it delivers.

MY FINAL POSITION IS THIS:

Nigeria must not return to the corruption and financial indiscipline associated with the old subsidy regime. But neither should Nigerians be told that their suffering is an unavoidable price of economic reform.

We need a system that rewards domestic production, protects consumers, attracts investment, creates jobs and maintains the revenue required to run the country.

Atiku Abubakar has put forward a different approach. Let the figures be examined. Let the costs be independently calculated. Let the legal questions be answered. Let the safeguards be established.

And if the policy can deliver affordable fuel without endangering essential public services, Nigerians deserve a serious debate about its implementation.

Government revenue is important. Economic stability is important. But the welfare of the Nigerian people must remain at the centre of economic policy.

A country cannot measure economic success by government revenue alone. It must also measure success by the ability of its citizens to feed their families, transport their goods, run their businesses and live with dignity.

Nigeria must be able to protect its treasury without abandoning its people. That is the standard by which every government and every economic policy should be judged.

PastorKay is a Social Activist and Political Commentator

🇳🇬 HAPPY INDEPENDENCE ANNIVERSARY, NIGERIA! 🇳🇬

Today, we celebrate our great nation and the strength, resilience, courage, and determination of Nigerians at home and all over the world.

May Nigeria continue to grow in peace, unity, prosperity, and development. May our nation overcome every challenge and may a brighter future rise for generations yet unborn.

Wherever you are in the world, be proud to be Nigerian. Our story is still being written, and we believe in the greatness of Nigeria.

Happy Independence Anniversary to every Nigerian, at home and in the diaspora! 🇳🇬💚🤍💚

Long live the Federal Republic of Nigeria! 🇳🇬

Refer to this thread:
https://www.nairaland.com/8745629/pay-1m-get-federal-job

How Did We Get Here? The Normalization of Bribery in Nigeria

There is something deeply troubling about the way we Nigerians have come to discuss corruption in Nigeria. A man asks whether he should pay ₦1 million to secure a federal government job or use that same money to start a business, and the response from some Nigerians is simple: “Get the job, save up, and open the business as a side hustle.”

That response deserves serious reflection.

Not because starting a business is a bad idea. Not because securing employment is wrong. But because the question exposes a disturbing reality: have we become so accustomed to corruption that we can casually discuss paying ₦1 million for a government job without stopping to ask whether that payment is a bribe?

When corruption becomes normal

Let us be honest with ourselves. If someone demands ₦1 million before giving you a job you are qualified to do, that is not a harmless transaction. It is a serious red flag for bribery, exploitation, or an illegal recruitment scheme, depending on the circumstances.

Yet, instead of condemning the demand, some people advise the man to pay the money, get the job, and recover his investment through salary.

How did we arrive at a point where the first question is no longer, “Is this right?” but “Will I eventually make my money back?”

This is how corruption survives. It survives when wrongdoing becomes an ordinary part of planning. It survives when people begin to measure the profitability of an injustice rather than question the injustice itself.

The dangerous logic of “get the job first”

Imagine a young Nigerian who has studied for years, acquired qualifications, and prepared himself for public service. He applies for a job and discovers that he must pay ₦1 million to secure it.

What happens to the qualified person who cannot afford that money?

What happens to the poor but brilliant graduate who deserves the opportunity just as much as anyone else?

What happens when employment is no longer based on merit, competence, and fairness, but on who can raise the required payment?

The answer is painful: capable people are excluded, public institutions are weakened, and the nation loses the opportunity to benefit from the talents of its citizens.

A government job should not be an auction where the highest bidder wins.

A salary is not a justification for corruption

Some may argue that a federal job provides stability, a monthly salary, and future opportunities. They may say that paying ₦1 million is an investment that will eventually pay off.

But the fact that an illegal or unethical payment might be financially profitable does not make it right.

If a person pays to obtain a position, what happens when another person offers more money for promotion? What happens when public contracts are awarded to those who pay the most? What happens when citizens must pay before receiving services they are already entitled to?

We cannot build a functioning country on the belief that every injustice is acceptable as long as it eventually benefits us.

The real cost is bigger than ₦1 million

The cost of bribery is not only the money paid. It is the damage done to trust, merit, institutions, and the future of the country.

When public jobs are sold, government employment becomes a privilege for the financially connected rather than an opportunity for qualified citizens.

When people normalize the practice, honest individuals are pressured to participate simply to survive.

When silence replaces accountability, those who profit from corruption become more powerful.

And when young Nigerians grow up believing that nothing can be achieved without paying someone, we have already damaged the foundation of the next generation.

We must stop blaming only the corrupt officials

Yes, officials who demand bribes must be held accountable. They abuse public trust and exploit the desperation of citizens.

But society must also examine the attitudes that allow such practices to flourish.

If we condemn corruption when it affects us but defend it when it benefits us, we are not fighting corruption. We are merely waiting for our own opportunity to participate.

The person who refuses to pay a bribe today may be protecting the rights of someone who cannot afford it tomorrow.

That is the kind of Nigeria we should want.

What should the man do?

The sensible response is not to encourage him to pay blindly. He should verify whether the recruitment is genuine, whether any official fee is legally authorized, and whether the demand is being made by an authorized institution.

If someone is demanding ₦1 million privately in exchange for a government appointment, that should be reported to the appropriate authorities where it is safe to do so.

And if the money can genuinely be used to start a viable business, that option deserves serious consideration—not because every business will succeed, but because no one should be forced to buy access to public employment.

How did we get here?

We got here through years of economic hardship, weak accountability, political patronage, unemployment, and the gradual acceptance of practices that should have been rejected.

We got here when people began to say, “That is how Nigeria works,” instead of asking, “Why must Nigeria work this way?”

We got here when corruption became so common that people started giving financial advice about it.

But we do not have to remain here.

Nigeria cannot develop when citizens are forced to pay for opportunities they have earned through their qualifications. We cannot build a just society when public service is treated as a private marketplace.

A government job is not a commodity to be sold to the highest bidder. A bribe is not an investment. And corruption does not become acceptable simply because someone hopes to benefit from it.

The question is not merely whether ₦1 million should be used to secure a job or start a business.

The bigger question is this:

What kind of country are we building when paying for a job has become so normal that people discuss it without outrage?

We must recover our conscience. We must demand transparency. We must reject the normalization of bribery.

Because if we continue to accept corruption as the price of survival, we will eventually discover that we have paid far more than ₦1 million for the destruction of our nation.

PastorKay is a Political Commentator and Social Activist

Lithiumite:
"If Atiku’s proposal can be properly structured with transparency, accountability and strong safeguards against corruption, then it deserves serious national consideration rather than being dismissed as mere populism."

This is quoting you directly, your inference here in itself makes amorphous and manifestly nebulous the campaign rhetoric by atiku which you are backing inherently with just mere hope and nothing more.......but from history of Nigerian politicians, thats not an intelligent way to just merely take the words from any of them without proper rationalisation.

By now we already expect the atiku team to start throwing figures at us,backed with data and facts.......but what we are getting in an amorphous campaign gimmick without structure......assumptions that can never hold water in the real world, totally in abeyance to logic.

I understand where you are coming from. But I think we should be able to hold them accountable to what they say.

5 Strong Reasons IMPI Is Wrong About Atiku’s Plan to Make Fuel Affordable

Opinion

By PastorKay,

The Independent Media and Policy Initiative (IMPI) has raised concerns about former Vice President Atiku Abubakar’s proposal to restore affordable fuel prices through a shift from consumption subsidy to production subsidy. While concerns about fiscal responsibility and investor confidence are legitimate, I strongly believe IMPI is wrong to dismiss the proposal as reckless populism. I'm not a supporter of Atiku Abubakar and I have never met him in my entire life; but I support this idea wholly and I will explain this with just 5 Reasons.

1. The Current System Has Brought Nigerians More Pain Than Relief

Since the removal of fuel subsidy, the prices of petrol, transportation, food and other essential goods have risen dramatically. Economic reforms cannot be judged successful merely because government revenues have increased while millions of Nigerians are struggling to survive. The ultimate purpose of any economic policy must be to improve the lives of the people. But if not, then the entire policy needs not just partial but total review and reversal.

2. Atiku’s Proposal Is Not Simply a Return to the Old Subsidy Regime

There is an important difference between subsidising consumption and supporting production. A policy that helps local refineries obtain crude under properly structured arrangements to reduce production costs deserves serious consideration. Nigeria must encourage local refining and reduce dependence on expensive imported petroleum products. Currently, with Dangote Refinery in operation, Importation figures have gone down. 90% of Subsidy corruption was embedded in fuel imports and if Importation goes away, definitely Subsidy corruption also goes away with it.

3. The Claim That Atiku’s Proposal Will Scare Away Investors Is Not Convincing

The argument that Atiku’s proposal to make fuel more affordable will automatically scare away investors is not convincing. Investors do not invest in a country simply because fuel prices are high or because prices have been completely deregulated. They invest where they can reasonably predict costs, make profits, find customers and operate within a stable business environment. In fact, extremely high fuel prices can themselves discourage investment. In Nigeria, businesses already struggle with unreliable electricity, forcing many companies to spend heavily on generators and alternative energy. When petrol and diesel prices rise sharply, the cost of manufacturing, transportation, logistics and distribution also increases. This makes Nigeria a more expensive place to do business. Investors are equally concerned about the purchasing power of the people. A company may establish a factory, shop or business, but it needs customers who can afford to buy its products. When high fuel and transportation costs push up the prices of food, goods and services, millions of Nigerians lose purchasing power. A population that cannot afford to buy is not necessarily an attractive market for investors.

4. Nigeria Cannot Continue Sacrificing Its Citizens in the Name of Economic Reforms

If subsidy removal and foreign exchange reforms have generated trillions of additional resources for government, Nigerians have every right to ask a simple question: Where is the corresponding improvement in their lives? The people need better roads, hospitals, schools, electricity and security; but they also need to be able to afford transportation and food.

5. Nigeria Needs Nigerian Solutions, Not Blind Deregulation

Deregulation is not automatically successful simply because it is described as a market reform. Nigeria has widespread poverty, weak infrastructure, unreliable electricity and enormous transportation challenges. Any government must design economic policies based on the realities facing its citizens.

My position is simple: Nigerians should not be forced to choose between economic reform and economic survival. If Atiku’s proposal can be properly structured with transparency, accountability and strong safeguards against corruption, then it deserves serious national consideration rather than being dismissed as mere populism.

The real question is not whether Nigeria should blindly return to the past or blindly continue with the present. The real question is: What economic policy will genuinely reduce suffering, promote production, strengthen local industries and improve the lives of Nigerians?

PastorKay, a Social Commentator and Political Activist

spiceadole:
No, I did not and I still do not have a good relationship with them.

My father was tough , abusive and extremely malicious.. made it clear he wasn't my friend or mate. The only time I could stay even 1 minute close to him was either he was beating me or verbally abusing me.

My mother was excessively judgemental and annoyingly over religious. She also believed I was a child and never had a say.

I left home as a teenager to university and stayed away for 3 years.. didn't visit and they didn't bother.
They didn't attend my matriculation, induction and convocation.
I learnt how to celebrate my wins alone.
First picture I took with my parents was during my wedding.
My siblings and I never had one family picture with them.

Today, I just send money when I want to. We still don't relate.
I don't know how to talk to/gist with them especially my father. My children do not know them.

I haven't spoken to my mum in 3 months and my dad in 11 months. I try not to pick his calls because we have nothing to discuss.
It's too late to begin building a relationship.

What a man sow... That he will surely reap. From your story, your parents gave you one of the best strict upbringing. And look at what you are writing against them proudly. I hope when you start reaping what you are sowing and your children start behaving that way to you... You will not complain. Pick up that phone and call that wonderful old man and appreciate him for being there for you and making you who you are today. Do same to that beautiful woman of God that brought you up in a God fearing manner. Call her and tell her that you love her and make a plan on how their grandchildren will meet with them and spend some time with them if possible.
Do that now that you have that opportunity as you may not still have it for long.

Can you imagine..?

5 STRONG REASONS WHY I SUPPORT ATIKU’S POSITION ON FUEL SUBSIDY

Opinion:

By PastorKay

The debate over fuel subsidy has once again taken centre stage in Nigeria’s political and economic conversation. However, before Nigerians dismiss Atiku Abubakar’s proposal simply because of the word “subsidy,” we must carefully examine what he is proposing and the potential impact it could have on the lives of ordinary Nigerians. I support Atiku’s position because Nigeria must begin to put the welfare of its citizens at the centre of economic policies. Economic reforms are important, but reforms that bring unbearable hardship to millions of citizens must be constantly reviewed.

1. NIGERIANS NEED URGENT RELIEF FROM THE HIGH COST OF LIVING

The cost of living in Nigeria has become unbearable for many families. Food prices have risen, transportation has become expensive and businesses are struggling with high energy costs. Fuel is connected to almost every aspect of the Nigerian economy. When the price of fuel rises, transportation costs increase. When transportation costs increase, the prices of food and other essential commodities are affected. A policy that successfully reduces the cost of fuel could therefore bring significant relief to millions of Nigerians. Economic reform must not only look good in government reports and economic statistics. The ordinary Nigerian must be able to feel the benefits.

2. CHEAPER FUEL COULD HELP REDUCE TRANSPORTATION AND FOOD COSTS

The price of fuel does not end at the filling station. It affects the cost of moving people, goods and agricultural products across the country. Farmers need transportation to move their produce from rural communities to the cities. Traders need transportation to move goods. Workers spend a significant part of their income on transportation every day. When transportation becomes expensive, almost everything becomes expensive. If a properly designed policy helps reduce the cost of fuel and energy, it could help reduce transportation costs and ease some of the pressure on food prices and other essential goods. This means the benefits could go beyond motorists and reach ordinary families across Nigeria.

3. NIGERIA SHOULD SUPPORT LOCAL PRODUCTION, NOT ENRICH MIDDLEMEN

One of the strongest reasons I support a new approach to fuel subsidy is the need to move away from a system that benefits middlemen and towards one that strengthens Nigerian production. Nigeria is an oil-producing nation. It is unacceptable for a country blessed with enormous petroleum resources to remain permanently dependent on importing refined petroleum products. Any government intervention should focus on strengthening domestic refining, encouraging local production and ensuring that Nigerians benefit directly from the resources of their country. Nigeria should not spend public money enriching a few individuals. Nigeria should use its resources to strengthen industries, create jobs, increase local production and reduce the cost of living for its people.

4. TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY MUST REPLACE THE OLD SYSTEM

Let me be clear: supporting a new approach to subsidy does not mean supporting corruption. Nigeria cannot afford a return to an open-ended system where public funds disappear without accountability. Any subsidy or government intervention must have a clear structure, a known budget and strict public accountability. Nigerians must know how much money is being spent, who is benefiting and what the country is receiving in return. There must be independent monitoring and auditing. There must be consequences for corruption. There must be transparency at every stage. If public money is being spent in the name of helping Nigerians, then Nigerians must actually see and feel the benefits. The days of using subsidy as a cover for enriching powerful individuals must never return.

5. THE WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE MUST BE THE PURPOSE OF ECONOMIC POLICY

The ultimate purpose of every government is the welfare and security of its people. An economy is not successful simply because certain statistics have improved. Economic growth must translate into better lives for ordinary citizens. Nigeria needs investment. Nigeria needs fiscal discipline. Nigeria needs reforms. But Nigeria also needs leaders who understand the daily struggles of the people. The Nigerian people should not be expected to suffer endlessly in the name of economic reform. Government must find a balance between building a strong economy and protecting citizens from extreme hardship. A good economic policy must not only satisfy economists and international institutions. It must also put food on the table, make transportation affordable, support businesses and give ordinary citizens hope.

MY POSITION

I do not support corruption in the name of subsidy. I do not support enriching middlemen with public funds. I do not support an irresponsible system that will destroy Nigeria’s finances. But I strongly support any transparent and accountable policy that will reduce the suffering of Nigerians, strengthen local production, create jobs and lower the cost of living. The real question is not simply whether government should intervene in the fuel sector. The real question is whether that intervention will genuinely benefit the Nigerian people. Nigeria must move away from policies that enrich a privileged few and embrace policies that put the people first. If Atiku’s proposed approach can genuinely strengthen domestic production, reduce energy costs, lower transportation expenses and bring relief to struggling Nigerians, then it deserves serious national consideration.

Nigeria should not subsidise corruption. Nigeria should not subsidise middlemen. Nigeria should support production. Nigeria should protect its people. And above all, Nigeria must ensure that every naira of public money works for the benefit of the Nigerian people.

PastorKay is a
Public Commentator and Social Activist

Congratulations Adeleke 🎊 👏
Congratulations Adeleke 🎊 👏
Congratulations Adeleke 🎊 👏

Happy Birthday Great man..!

FRANCE will win 2 - 1

African Union, AU. Should really come into the issue.

WHERE IS THE AFRICAN UNION (AU)?

The Deafening Silence Over Xenophobic Attacks and the June 30 Deadline in South Africa

By PastorKay

Africa is bleeding, yet the continent's highest political body appears to be watching in silence.

As thousands of African migrants flee for their lives in South Africa, abandoning businesses, homes, families, and dreams because of escalating xenophobic violence and the fear surrounding the June 30 ultimatum issued by anti-migrant groups, one painful question echoes across the continent:

Where is the African Union (AU)?

The African Union was founded on the ideals of unity, solidarity, peace, and the protection of Africans everywhere on the continent. It was built on the belief that an attack on one African should concern every African. Yet today, many Africans are wondering whether those ideals still have meaning when fellow Africans are intimidated, attacked, displaced, and forced to flee another African country in search of safety.

This is no longer just a South African issue.

It is an African issue.

When citizens of Nigeria, Ghana, Malawi, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and several other African nations are forced to abandon their homes, businesses, and livelihoods because they fear for their safety, then the dream of African unity is under serious threat. Families are being separated. Children are watching parents leave. Businesses built through years of sacrifice are disappearing overnight. Human dignity is under attack.

The African Union should not be remembered only for organizing summits, issuing statements, and celebrating Africa Day. It should also be remembered for standing firmly with Africans whenever they are threatened anywhere on the continent.

Silence at a time like this sends the wrong message.

Africans deserve answers.

- Where is the emergency summit?
- Where is the united continental response?
- Where is the strong diplomatic intervention?
- Where is the reassurance that every African life truly matters?

In my opinion, the AU's response has fallen far short of what this moment demands. If a member state repeatedly fails to guarantee the safety and dignity of fellow Africans within its borders, then stronger continental measures should be on the table.

In my view, South Africa should already be facing serious consideration for suspension from certain African Union activities until it demonstrates a sustained commitment to protecting all Africans living within its territory. Unity cannot exist without accountability. Membership in a continental body should carry responsibilities as well as privileges.

South Africa undoubtedly faces serious domestic challenges, including unemployment, crime, inequality, and pressure on public services. Those challenges deserve real solutions. However, they can never justify violence, intimidation, or hatred directed at people simply because they come from another African nation. Every sovereign country has the right to enforce its immigration laws, but it also has the responsibility to protect every person within its borders from violence and unlawful persecution.

Africa cannot build the future envisioned in Agenda 2063 while Africans are living in fear of fellow Africans.

History will remember not only those who carried out acts of violence but also those institutions that remained silent when decisive leadership was required.

The African Union still has an opportunity to prove that African solidarity is more than a slogan. It must speak with courage, act with urgency, and demonstrate that the life of every African—regardless of nationality—is equally valuable.

The hope of millions across this continent is that the AU will rise above diplomatic caution and defend the very principles upon which it was founded.

Because if the African Union cannot stand up for Africans in Africa, then who will?

PastorKay is a Social Activist and Political Commentator based in Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Nigerians are never afraid of paying high tarries. All they are saying... Give us light and Nigerians pay their bills diligently.

5 Reasons Why Stable Electricity Is Very Possible in Nigeria. And How It Can Be Achieved.

By PastorKay

This article is a response to a recent publication which argued that Nigerians' desire for cheap electricity is the major obstacle to achieving stable power supply.

The debate over Nigeria's electricity sector has once again taken center stage. A recent article argued that whether it is Bola Tinubu, Peter Obi, Atiku Abubakar, or any other presidential candidate, none can successfully deliver stable electricity because Nigerians resist the reforms required to make the sector work.

While the article raises some important concerns about tariffs, metering, and electricity theft, it misses one crucial point: stable electricity is not only possible in Nigeria, it is achievable within a reasonable time if the right policies are consistently implemented.

History has already shown us the way.

1. Nigeria Has Already Solved a Bigger Infrastructure Problem Before

Many Nigerians are too young to remember how difficult communication was before GSM.

Before 2001, obtaining a telephone line was almost impossible. People waited years, paid huge sums, and still could not get connected. Communication was a luxury.

Then President Olusegun Obasanjo made one bold policy decision: he liberalized the telecom sector, licensed private operators, encouraged investment, and created an environment where businesses could compete.

Government did not build MTN, Glo, Airtel, or Etisalat. It simply created the right policies.

Today, virtually every Nigerian owns a mobile phone. Nigerians willingly spend thousands of naira every month on airtime and data because the service works.

The lesson is simple:

People do not complain about paying for services that are reliable.

2. Nigerians Already Pay More for Electricity Than They Realize

Many argue that Nigerians cannot afford cost-reflective tariffs.

But the truth is different.

Millions of Nigerians already spend enormous amounts every month on:

- Petrol

- Diesel

- Generator maintenance

- Engine oil

- Inverters

- Batteries

- Solar backup systems

For many households and businesses, these costs are far higher than what a reliable grid electricity supply would cost.

Band A has demonstrated this reality. Many consumers who now enjoy significantly improved supply are paying higher tariffs because they are receiving better service.

The real issue is not paying.

The real issue is paying and still sitting in darkness.

3. Stable Electricity Requires Investment, Not Political Slogans

Campaign promises such as "I will deliver 24-hour electricity" or "I will add 10,000MW" sound attractive.

However, generation alone does not solve Nigeria's electricity crisis.

Power must be:
- Generated

- Transmitted

- Distributed

- Metered

- Paid for

- Protected from theft

Every part of the chain must work together.

That requires long-term investment, transparent regulation, and consistent policies—not campaign slogans.

4. Nigerians Must See Value Before They Accept Higher Tariffs

One mistake governments often make is asking citizens to pay more before service improves.

Trust works the opposite way.

Improve supply.

Install prepaid meters.

Reduce estimated billing.

Fight corruption within the distribution companies.

Once Nigerians consistently receive reliable electricity, resistance to paying appropriate tariffs will naturally reduce.

This is exactly what happened in telecommunications.

Nobody protests against buying data because people receive the service they paid for.

Electricity should follow the same model.

5. Political Will Matters More Than Political Promises

Experts have repeatedly identified what Nigeria needs:

- Massive investment in generation

- Stronger transmission infrastructure

- Better distribution networks

- Universal metering

- Reduced electricity theft

- Cost-reflective pricing implemented fairly

- Independent regulation

- Private-sector participation

None of these ideas are new.
The challenge has never been a lack of solutions. The challenge has always been implementing them consistently across several administrations.

The Bottom Line is that Nigeria's electricity challenge is difficult; but it is not impossible.

The telecom revolution proves that when government creates the right policies, encourages investment, and allows competition to thrive, transformational change can happen.

Stable electricity will not come through speeches alone.

Neither will it come through subsidies that bankrupt government.

It will come through bold reforms, honest regulation, private investment, modern infrastructure, effective metering, and a commitment to ensuring Nigerians receive value for what they pay.

If we could move from waiting years for a telephone line to carrying smartphones in our pockets within two decades, then we can also move from generators and darkness to reliable electricity.

The question is no longer whether Nigeria can achieve stable electricity.

The real question is whether we have the political courage and policy consistency to make it happen.

Conclusion: A One-Year Roadmap to 24/7 Electricity in Nigeria

Achieving uninterrupted electricity within one year is ambitious, but it is possible if a government treats it as a national emergency and implements reforms decisively. The foundation already exists; what is required is leadership, execution, and accountability.

A practical roadmap could look like this:

Month 1–2: Declare a National Power Emergency


- Set clear, measurable targets for generation, transmission, and distribution.

- Establish a high-level Power Delivery Task Force reporting directly to the President.

- Remove bureaucratic bottlenecks delaying critical projects.

Month 2–4: Unlock Private Investment.
- Encourage massive private investment in generation, transmission, and distribution.

- Guarantee investors a transparent regulatory environment and enforce existing contracts.

- Fast-track embedded generation and captive power projects for industries and states.

Month 3–6: Meter Every Paying Customer
- Launch an aggressive nationwide metering programme.

- Eliminate estimated billing.

- Use smart meters to reduce losses, improve billing accuracy, and restore consumer confidence.

Month 4–8: Strengthen the Distribution Network
- Upgrade transformers, feeders, substations, and distribution lines in high-demand areas.

- Replace obsolete equipment causing frequent outages.

- Hold Distribution Companies accountable through strict performance targets.

Month 5–9: Tackle Electricity Theft.

- Establish special courts for electricity-related offences.

- Deploy smart monitoring systems to detect illegal connections.

- Enforce penalties while encouraging voluntary compliance.

Month 6–10: Implement Fair, Cost-Reflective Tariffs

- Ensure consumers pay tariffs that reflect the true cost of electricity, while protecting the poorest households with targeted subsidies rather than blanket subsidies.

- Link tariff adjustments directly to measurable improvements in service delivery.

Month 8–12: Expand Generation and Transmission.

- Complete abandoned power projects.

- Improve gas supply to power plants.

- Integrate renewable energy into underserved rural communities.

- Maximize the use of existing generation capacity by removing transmission bottlenecks.



Finally, government must maintain constant communication with Nigerians. Citizens are more willing to support reforms when they understand the benefits and can see visible improvements in service. The telecom revolution succeeded because policies attracted investment, competition improved quality, and consumers received value for what they paid.

Nigeria's electricity sector can follow the same path. Stable 24/7 power is not beyond our reach. It demands bold policy choices, disciplined execution, private-sector participation, and sustained political commitment. If these steps are pursued with urgency and consistency, Nigeria can move from chronic power shortages to reliable electricity far sooner than many believe.

PastorKay is a Public Analyst and Social Commentator Based in Port Harcourt

IamPatriotic:
My prediction for the 2027 presidential election is that Tinubu will win, but he will not perform as strongly in the North West and North East as he did in 2023. However, he will make up for those losses with stronger performances in the North Central, South South, and South West.
Tinubu will perform better in the North East and North West than Atiku will in the South West and South South. He will also win the North Central.
Obi will, as usual, dominate the South East with about 98% of the vote. He will perform better than Atiku in the South South and the Christian-majority parts of the North Central. Nevertheless, he will still finish third overall.

The assumption that President Tinubu will offset losses in the North West and North East with gains elsewhere underestimates the importance of those regions. Together, they account for Nigeria's largest voting population, and if Atiku consolidates them, Tinubu's path becomes much narrower.

The addition of Rotimi Amaechi as Atiku's running mate could also significantly reshape the race. Amaechi brings strong political influence in the South South, national appeal, and a reputation as a formidable grassroots mobiliser. His presence could weaken Tinubu's expected gains in the South South while making the ticket more attractive across the North Central.

Even if Peter Obi dominates the South East, a strong Atiku–Amaechi ticket could remain competitive nationwide by combining overwhelming support in the North with improved performances in the South South and North Central. In a close election, that combination could prove decisive.

Building a Winning Coalition: Why Atiku and Amaechi Could Become Nigeria's Most Formidable Ticket in 2027

By PastorKay

As Nigeria gradually approaches the 2027 General Elections, political realignments, coalition talks, and strategic consultations have begun to dominate the national conversation. With economic challenges, security concerns, and growing public demand for effective leadership, many Nigerians are already looking ahead to what promises to be one of the most competitive elections in the nation's democratic history.

For former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, the path to victory may depend largely on his ability to build a broad-based coalition capable of attracting support across regional, religious, and political divides. While no election is won by a single individual, the choice of a running mate often sends a powerful message about a campaign's direction, priorities, and capacity for governance.

Among the names that have emerged in political discussions, former Rivers State Governor and former Minister of Transportation, Rotimi Chibuike Amaechi, stands out as a strong and strategic option. An Atiku-Amaechi ticket could potentially unite critical political forces and create one of the most formidable alliances ahead of 2027.

1. A Powerful North-South Partnership

Successful presidential tickets in Nigeria often reflect the country's geopolitical diversity. An alliance between Atiku Abubakar from the North-East and Rotimi Amaechi from the South-South would create a balanced ticket with national appeal and geographical spread.

Such a partnership would send a strong signal of inclusiveness and national unity at a time when many Nigerians are seeking leadership that transcends regional boundaries.

2. Uniting Opposition Forces Under One Banner

One of the greatest challenges facing opposition politics in Nigeria has been fragmentation. Multiple candidates often divide votes that could otherwise be consolidated.

Amaechi's political influence and relationships across different political blocs could help strengthen coalition-building efforts, attract key stakeholders, and unite various groups behind a common objective.

3. Amaechi's Strong Political Base in the South-South

The South-South remains one of Nigeria's most politically significant regions. Having served as Governor of Rivers State for eight years, Amaechi commands considerable influence and possesses a well-established political network that could prove invaluable during a nationwide campaign.

His presence on the ticket could enhance voter mobilization across the Niger Delta and surrounding regions.

4. A Combination of Experience and Competence

Both Atiku and Amaechi possess decades of public service experience. Atiku's background in governance and economic matters complements Amaechi's record in state administration and infrastructure development.

Together, they would present voters with a ticket built on experience, institutional knowledge, and administrative capacity.

5. Strong Grassroots Mobilization Capacity

Elections are not won solely through media campaigns; they are won through grassroots engagement.

Amaechi has demonstrated an ability to connect with local political structures, community leaders, and grassroots supporters. His organizational strength could significantly enhance the effectiveness of a national campaign.

6. Expanding Electoral Reach Beyond Traditional Strongholds

For Atiku to improve his chances in 2027, he must expand beyond his traditional support base.

Amaechi's influence across southern Nigeria and his relationships with political actors nationwide could help broaden the ticket's appeal and attract undecided voters seeking a credible alternative.

7. A Record of Leadership and Public Service

Throughout his political journey, Amaechi has served as Speaker of the Rivers State House of Assembly, Governor, Chairman of the Nigeria Governors' Forum, and Minister of Transportation.

This extensive record provides a foundation upon which voters can evaluate his leadership credentials and governance experience.

8. National Visibility and Political Recognition

One advantage of selecting a nationally recognized running mate is immediate public familiarity.

Amaechi is a household name across Nigeria. His years in public service have given him visibility and recognition that would strengthen the profile of any presidential ticket.

9. The Ability to Energize the Campaign

Political campaigns require energy, resilience, and relentless engagement.

Amaechi has built a reputation as an active and effective campaigner who understands the demands of nationwide political contests. His presence could inject momentum into the campaign and strengthen outreach efforts.

10. Offering Nigerians a Credible Alternative

Ultimately, elections are about choices.

If Nigerians are looking for an alternative vision for governance, an Atiku-Amaechi ticket could present itself as a combination of experience, regional balance, political strength, and administrative competence.

Such a coalition would be positioned to engage voters on issues of economic recovery, job creation, national unity, infrastructure development, and institutional reform.

Conclusion

As political calculations ahead of 2027 continue to evolve, one reality remains clear: victory will likely depend on coalition-building, strategic partnerships, and the ability to unite diverse constituencies under a common vision.

An Atiku-Amaechi ticket would bring together two experienced political figures with extensive networks, governance credentials, and national recognition. Whether such an alliance eventually materializes remains to be seen, but there is little doubt that it would immediately become one of the most formidable political combinations in the race for Nigeria's highest office.

In a country as diverse and complex as Nigeria, building a winning coalition may ultimately be the key to electoral success. The partnership between Atiku Abubakar and Rotimi Amaechi could represent precisely that kind of coalition.

PastorKay is a Public Commentator and Social Analyst

They will file an appeal...

Mourner-in-Chief

I need more words to complete what is needed to make a response

The development was disclosed by the Executive Mayor of the City of Tshwane, Dr. Nasiphi Moya, in a post on X.

The city of Tshwane in South Africa disconnected electricity supply to the High Commission of the Federal Republic of Nigeria over unpaid utility bills, before later restoring power after the debt was settled.

The development was disclosed by the Executive Mayor of the City of Tshwane, Dr. Nasiphi Moya, in a post on X.

https://saharareporters.com/2026/02/02/south-africa-disconnects-power-supply-nigerian-high-commission-over-unpaid-bills

The Looming Catastrophe: Why Millions of Nigerians Risk Losing Their Money, Businesses, Homes, and Lives – Leading to the Worst Humanitarian Crisis in History Over the Next 25 Years

By PastorKay[i][/i]

When I saw this challenge – "Best answer wins 100k" – calling for a deep, honest explanation of why so many Nigerians stand to lose everything in the coming decades, I knew I had to take the time to respond properly. This isn't about quick hot takes or surface-level complaints; it's about connecting the dots between today's harsh realities and the projected trajectory through 2050.
The stakes are existential: widespread financial ruin, mass displacement, business collapse, skyrocketing deaths from hunger and violence, and a humanitarian disaster on a scale that could eclipse any in recorded history due to Nigeria's massive population and interconnected crises. Drawing from the latest 2026 reports, expert projections, and on-the-ground trends, here's a clear-eyed analysis of why this isn't hyperbole—it's a converging storm.

1. The Immediate Hunger and Food Security Cliff in 2026 – A Preview of Worse to Come:

Right now, in early 2026, Nigeria is staring down what the UN World Food Programme (WFP) describes as potentially the country's worst hunger crisis in modern history. Funding shortfalls mean WFP assistance could end by December 2025 levels into 2026, leaving up to 35 million people facing severe food insecurity – the highest number ever recorded. In the northeast (Borno, Adamawa, Yobe), around 15,000 people are already projected to face famine-like conditions (IPC Phase 5), with child malnutrition at critical levels in multiple states.
This isn't isolated: Conflict disrupts farming, kidnappings and banditry force farmers to abandon fields, and climate shocks like 2025 floods destroyed over 1.6 million hectares of farmland. High input costs (fertilizer up 19.5% to ₦52,000 per bag) and fuel prices mean even fewer farmers plant, leading to below-average harvests. The result? Acute food insecurity could hit 34.7 million in 2026 alone, per recent analyses. Families will deplete savings just to eat, small traders and agribusinesses will collapse from lack of supply and demand, and malnutrition will claim lives – especially among children.
This 2026 snapshot foreshadows the longer-term spiral: Without reversal, hunger escalates as population grows and resources shrink.

2. Population Boom Overwhelming Everything – From 230+ Million Today to ~400 Million by 2050

Nigeria's population is exploding faster than almost anywhere else. UN and World Bank projections show it reaching around 400 million by 2050, with urban areas alone swelling to 264 million (70% urbanization). That's an additional 140 million urban dwellers in just 25 years – more than double today's urban population.
This demographic pressure crushes infrastructure: Housing shortages lead to slum expansion and evictions; water and sanitation systems fail, breeding disease; schools and hospitals overflow. Job creation can't keep pace – Nigeria needs millions of new positions yearly for its youth bulge, but unemployment and underemployment stay high. Wealth concentrates in tiny elites (e.g., only ~5% with significant bank balances), starving the broader economy of circulating money. Businesses catering to the masses struggle as purchasing power erodes, while the few rich can't sustain broad demand.
The outcome: Widespread poverty deepens (already projected toward 62% in some scenarios), savings vanish, homes are lost to inability to pay rent or mortgages, and informal enterprises fold. This isn't abstract – it's families selling assets, businesses shuttering, and migration turning desperate.

3. Climate Change as a Multiplier of Destruction:

Rising temperatures (potentially 2.9–5.7°C by 2100 in high-emissions paths), erratic rains, droughts in the north, floods in the south, and sea-level rise (threatening Lagos with meters of water by 2050) will devastate agriculture – the backbone for 70% of jobs. Crop yields could drop sharply, food imports soar (already eating 17% of forex), and prices skyrocket (food inflation lingering high).
Internal climate migration could displace 9.4 million by 2050 in pessimistic scenarios, overwhelming cities and sparking resource fights. Homes wash away in floods, farms turn to desert, businesses reliant on local supply chains fail. Economic losses from inaction could reach billions annually, wiping out household wealth and national growth potential.

4. Insecurity Fueling a Vicious Cycle:

Insurgencies (Boko Haram/ISWAP), banditry, farmer-herder clashes, and emerging threats from Sahel groups displace millions yearly. In 2025–2026, attacks surged, civilian deaths hit highs, and displacement continued in the tens of thousands. This disrupts everything: Farms abandoned, markets unsafe, transport costs explode. By mid-century, population-resource pressures intensify conflicts, potentially leading to far higher fatalities and destruction. Businesses face extortion or raids, properties get looted or burned, lives are lost directly or indirectly through blocked aid and services.

5. Economic Fragility – Oil Dependency, Debt, and Policy Traps:

Despite modest growth projections (4.4–5.5% in 2026 from World Bank/NESG), structural issues persist: Oil reliance exposes Nigeria to global shifts; debt servicing swallows budgets; inflation erodes value. The "borrow to live" cycle mirrors household realities – government and citizens alike trap in debt repayment over investment.
Without massive diversification, job creation, and inclusive growth (as outlined in Agenda 2050 ambitions), poverty entrenches. Small businesses – the economy's spine – collapse under costs, insecurity, and weak demand, leading to mass financial losses.
The Cumulative Horror: Why This Could Be History's Worst Humanitarian Crisis
These aren't separate issues – they feed each other. Hunger weakens bodies and economies → insecurity worsens → climate hits harder → population strains break systems. By 2050, Nigeria could face tens of millions in chronic crisis, mass starvation, disease outbreaks, mega-displacements, and conflict deaths on a scale dwarfing past famines or wars – simply because of sheer numbers (400 million people in fragility).
Absolute numbers matter: Even if percentages aren't the absolute worst, the raw human toll – millions losing homes/businesses/lives – could outstrip historical benchmarks.
This isn't inevitable. Agenda 2050, security reforms, climate adaptation, population policies, and fairer wealth distribution could pivot the path. But time is short, and 2026's hunger cliff shows how fast things deteriorate without action.

Conclusion:

The Path Forward – Act Now or Lose Everything:

Writing this stark warning without solutions would be pointless. The projected losses of money, businesses, homes, and lives are not inevitable. Nigeria has roadmaps: This Government can adopt this and call it Agenda 2050, the Renewed Hope Development Plan (2026–2030),

Don't forget; The difference between catastrophe and turnaround lies in urgent, serious implementation starting in 2026.

Key actions needed immediately:

1. Stop the 2026 Hunger Crisis:

Scale emergency food aid, cash transfers, agricultural inputs, and nutrition programs in the worst-hit states (northeast, northwest, north-central). Reduce post-harvest losses and secure farmer access to land.

2. Diversify the Economy Fast:

Push agriculture, manufacturing, digital services, renewables, and SMEs with affordable credit, infrastructure, and tax/investment reforms to create millions of jobs and reduce oil dependence.

3. Build Climate Resilience:

Accelerate flood defenses, drought-resistant farming, coastal protection (especially Lagos), and renewable energy rollout. Integrate climate-smart practices into agriculture and urban planning.

4. Restore Security:

Strengthen community policing, target banditry and insurgency decisively, address farmer-herder conflicts through dialogue and land access reforms, and link security to resource management.

5. Manage Population & Invest in People:

Expand education (especially for girls), family planning, healthcare, and youth skills training to slow growth pressures and turn the youth bulge into an asset.

6. Mobilize Funding & Accountability:

Improve domestic revenue, attract private and green investment, secure international support, and enforce transparent monitoring so plans don’t remain on paper.

If leaders, citizens, businesses, and partners commit to these priorities with real political will and funding, Nigeria can avoid the worst humanitarian disaster in history. Poverty can fall sharply, hunger can be prevented, businesses can thrive, homes can be protected, and millions of lives can be saved.

The next 25 years do not have to be defined by collapse. They can mark the moment Nigeria finally rises to its potential—but only if decisive action begins right now.

The choice is clear. Nigerians must demand—and leaders must deliver—a future worth living in.

I wrote this not for the 100k prize alone, but because the truth needs saying loudly. Nigerians deserve better than denial. The crisis is building – ignoring it costs everything.

#PastorKay is a Social Activist & Political Commentator.

Mankind2024:
Why Captain Ibrahim Traoré Is Playing with Fire by Detaining Nigerian Soldiers
Many people underestimate the capabilities of the Nigerian military and what it could mean for the government of Burkina Faso under Captain Ibrahim Traoré.

Don't be misled by Nigeria's ongoing internal security challenges—fighting Fulani herdsmen clashes, kidnappers, bandits, and jihadist insurgents in the North, or separatist agitation in the East involving IPOB and unknown gunmen. These are asymmetric insurgencies, complicated by local sympathies and complex socio-political dynamics that make total eradication difficult without massive collateral impact. No advanced military in the world easily wins such protracted internal wars.

In stark contrast, a direct confrontation with Burkina Faso would be conventional (symmetric) warfare. The Nigerian Armed Forces—Africa's largest by personnel, with superior airpower, logistics, and combat experience—have the overwhelming potential to overrun Burkina Faso's smaller military and, if provoked far enough, enforce regime change in Ouagadougou.

Dismiss any notion that Russia's support for Traoré would deter this. Nigeria could establish theater commands in neighboring countries like Ghana, Côte d'Ivoire, Benin, and Togo for a multi-front operation, [color=#006600][/color]leveraging regional alliances and superior resources.

This detention risks escalating a diplomatic incident into something far more dangerous. Traoré's supporters—often vocal online pan-Africanists and certain political factions—may cheer the bravado now, but they would have plenty to lament if things spiral out of control.

So Bukina Faso don't have allies..? And what makes you think those countries you are calling will support Nigeria to fight another African country. Tell your President to drop ego and put a call through to Troure and get this issue sorted out in seconds.

Bandits Boldly Flaunt Bundles Of Naira They Got From Ransom. Pictures

trutharena:
Pastor Kay, you don drop some serious reasoning wey go make Bwala think am over

The man is a mess

WHY DANIEL BWALA MUST RESIGN — NIGERIA CANNOT BE LED BY EXCUSES

Opinion:

By PastorKay

Daniel Bwala’s recent remarks about the government’s inability to track terrorists flaunting ransom money and weapons online is more than a slip of the tongue—it is an indictment of the Tinubu administration’s approach to national security and public accountability. At a time when Nigerians are being kidnapped daily, when families are forced to sell land and property to pay ransoms, and when communities live in fear of bandits and extremists, the least the Presidency owes the nation is a sense of direction. Instead, Bwala delivered a public confession of confusion and helplessness.

In his interview, he boldly claimed that terrorists cannot be tracked because they use Starlink and other foreign network providers that “are not registered in Nigeria.” Yet the same government moves with lightning speed to arrest critics, activists, journalists, and even comedians who speak against its policies. This contradiction is unacceptable. It is shameful. And it is enough reason for Bwala to tender his resignation.

Below are five expanded reasons why Daniel Bwala must step down immediately:


1. He Publicly Admitted Government Helplessness—A Security Disaster

Bwala did not merely explain a challenge; he broadcasted to the entire world that Nigeria is incapable of tracking terrorists.
This is a catastrophic PR failure. Terrorist groups thrive on perception.
When a presidential spokesperson announces that the government is blind and powerless whenever criminals switch to a different internet provider, he strengthens criminal confidence and weakens national morale.
No responsible government official should make such a reckless declaration. This alone is enough reason for him to resign.

2. He Exposed the Double Standard in Law Enforcement

Nigerians have long questioned why the government is quick to arrest peaceful protesters, online critics, and political opponents, yet struggles to apprehend terrorists who openly show their faces while flaunting ransom money. Instead of addressing this hypocrisy, Bwala attempted to justify it with a weak technological excuse.
His explanation confirms what Nigerians already suspect: The government prioritises silencing dissent over dismantling terrorism.
A spokesperson who appears to rationalize injustice cannot occupy such a sensitive position.

3. He Damaged Nigeria’s International Reputation

Countries around the world rely on counter-terror surveillance technologies—satellite tracking, signal interception, cyber-intelligence, cross-border cooperation, and digital footprints. By claiming that Nigeria cannot track terrorists using Starlink because it is “in the space,” Bwala portrayed the country as one lacking even basic intelligence capacity. This kind of statement: discourages foreign investors, embarrasses the security institutions, and makes the nation look weak to both allies and enemies. No modern nation can afford a spokesperson who speaks recklessly about national vulnerabilities on international platforms.

4. He Offered Excuses Instead of Strategies

Leadership requires: solutions, roadmaps, improved intelligence strategies, regional collaboration, cyber-monitoring development, and proactive policy direction. But Bwala provided none. He did not offer a single step the government intends to take to solve the problem he described. All he did was point fingers at an internet provider, as though Starlink were the mastermind of terrorism in Nigeria. A spokesperson who cannot articulate solutions contributes to Nigeria’s insecurity.
He must resign for gross incompetence.

5. He Spread False Information to the Public

This is perhaps the most damaging of all. Starlink is registered and licensed by the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC). The Nigerian government itself announced its approval in 2023. Claiming that Starlink is “not registered in Nigeria” is factually incorrect, misleading, and dangerous—especially when discussing national security. A presidential spokesperson must be informed and accurate.
Providing wrong information on an issue as sensitive as terrorism is enough proof that he is not fit for the job. If a spokesperson misinforms the nation, he becomes a liability, not an asset.

FINAL CONCLUSION: NIGERIA DESERVES BETTER

National security communication requires: intelligence, discipline, accuracy, strategic awareness, and professionalism. Daniel Bwala’s statement failed in all five areas. A presidency that demands respect must first respect the citizens. And one of the first steps toward restoring that respect is removing or accepting the resignation of a spokesperson who has demonstrated: poor judgment, misinformation, carelessness, unpreparedness, and a dangerous disregard for national image.

Daniel Bwala must resign.
Not because of politics, but because Nigeria deserves a spokesperson who understands that every word from that office affects the nation’s security, credibility, and stability. Silence from the Presidency would only mean endorsement of incompetence.

PastorKay is a Social Activist and Political Commentator.

ALLNIGERIANSMAD:
and if you see two senior fuulish police officers parading alongside with the mascurade during arrest taking selfies like they've achieved milestones

See them...

Crinkum crankum 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Crinkum crankum 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Crinkum crankum 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Crinkum crankum 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Flangelo12:
I no talk am?

I said he did nothing wrong.

We say it as it is.

Do some masquerade dance for us, joor.

😁😄😄😄😃😃😁🤣🤣🤣🤣

University of UYO hold it's inaugural lecture on "CANDELABRUM AND CRINKUM-CRANKUM..!"

Iagos:
Wow, the Governor would be embarrased

Sure