₦airaland Forum

Thanks please more signature

Thanks guys plesse we need 100 we have 92 already

Thanks please we need more

Please help sign this plssss

Please help we need signatures

Hello

Please a Nigerian needs your help in help in Germany over an unlawful judge who perverted justice. Please help sign and share the petition. It's free and from a credible website change.org. Thank you for your support. Please remember to confirm your signature in your email or it will be deleted.

https://chng.it/fPDhPbbDjT

Sad story please let's help support him by signing and sharing this petition Very sad story





I am a severely disabled migrant in Germany who is currently facing deportation because of the action of an unlawful judge and the German judiciary protects him.

My name is ]withheld due to threat of life]. I was prosecuted in Tübingen, Germany, accused of resisting the police — in the public prosecutor's office in Tübingen. I successfully defended myself against all but one charge. I appealed the last conviction, and together with my lawyer, we submitted a detailed legal challenge.

At the appeal hearing in the Tübingen Regional Court, Judge Dr. Allmendinger heard our case. We presented evidence, questioned witnesses, and made our legal arguments in full. But to our shock, I was convicted again — and the reason given in court seemed legally insufficient.

We immediately filed another appeal to the higher regional court. But when we received the written judgment, we were horrified.

Judge Dr. Allmendinger had altered, omitted, and misrepresented major parts of the witness statements. He even changed my own testimony. The reason he gave in court for my conviction was different from what appeared in the written decision. It was as if my lawyer had never been present. The record was falsified.

I was devastated. I called the judge's office the very next day. He told me that my lawyer should write to him and he will respond. We submitted an 8-page letter, clearly documenting the discrepancies between the hearing and the written judgment. We never received any response.

In Germany, there are no transcripts or audio recordings in higher courts. Nothing was recorded. And because of this, there is no legal way to prove what really happened in court. The judiciary assumes judges act with integrity and summarize facts correctly. But what if they don’t? In revision, higher courts must accept the lower court’s findings unless a legal error is clearly apparent. Judge Allmendinger’s actions destroyed our ability to challenge the verdict.

We later learned that this judge previously worked as a public prosecutor in the same Tübingen office where the alleged crime occurred — a clear conflict of interest.

In desperation, I went to the district court to peacefully protest. Because of my severe disability, I was slow to walk down the stairs when asked to leave. A court security officer pushed me down the stairs. I fell, hit my head, and almost lost my life. I have a recording of this.

I almost attempted suicide. If not for the actions of a close friend, I might not be here today. I don’t want to relive the trauma or the chronic depression that forces me to rely on medication just to sleep. But I have to speak out—because I fear that Dr. Allmendinger could do the same to others.

My final appeal was rejected for “no legal error.” The case is now before the German Federal Constitutional Court. Germany’s Basic Law contains many protections for individual rights—but how can migrants, minorities, and vulnerable people defend those rights when they can’t prove what was said? The Federal Constitutional Court says everyone has rights, regardless of race or status. They must also be given a real opportunity to fight for them.

I am not the only one. Many lawyers I have spoken with confirm that this often happens — where judges can do whatever they want, and defendants have no meaningful way to challenge them. There are no records. No accountability. No remedies.

It is important to reference a statement by former Stuttgart Regional Court judge, Frank Fahsel, who said:

"I was a judge at the Stuttgart Regional Court from 1973 to 2004, and during that time I experienced unbelievable and countless violations of the law and perversions of justice organized by the system, which could not be challenged because they conformed to the system. I have encountered countless judges and public prosecutors who could simply be called 'criminal.' Yet, they were, and in some cases still are, sacrosanct—untouchable—because they acted 'per Ordre de Mufti' (i.e., on orders from above) or were covered by the system for the sake of their reputation... It is not possible to take action against such colleagues in the justice system because the system protects itself from being exposed."

The German judiciary protects judges — not the public.

If a judge is biased, racist, or dishonest, you are powerless. The system makes sure of it.

Why are the United Nations Human Rights Council, the European Court of Human Rights, and all international watchdogs not speaking out about this? Is it because it's Germany? Why are major international media silent?

I am calling on the United Nations Human Rights Council, the European Court of Human Rights, and all international watchdogs to act. These institutions often speak out against injustice in smaller countries — but remain silent when a major Western democracy like Germany systematically denies minorities and disabled individuals the right to a fair trial.

This petition is not just about me. It is about the many others — especially migrants and minorities — who are silenced, discredited, and convicted in a system that refuses to record the truth.

The right to a fair trial is not optional. It's not cultural. It is universal. It must apply to everyone.

Please sign and share this petition.

This has to stop.



(These are not unfounded as there are lots of evidence and witnesses, you can reach me at kelvinonue@gmail.com)


https://chng.it/zB8RFkW5dv

The German judiciary is really flawed...

BlackViper:
How do you know that the judge altered witness statements if as you said there is:

no official transcript of proceedings. No verbatim record, no written evidence of what was said.

The defendant’s and his lawyers took notes...and the lawyer called the public prosecutor who confirmed this

Judicial Independence or Impunity? The Dark Side of the German Judiciary

Germany is known for having one of the best judicial systems in the world. But beneath this reputation lies a deeply flawed system that fails to protect individuals from bias, corruption, and injustice—with no real remedies for those affected.
Here’s something shocking: In the higher courts of Germany, there is no official transcript of proceedings. No verbatim record, no written evidence of what was said. This loophole is exploited by corrupt and biased judges to manipulate justice, with zero accountability—and the system protects them.

This is the story of a severely disabled migrant in Tübingen, Germany who is currently facing deportation and fighting for his right to a fair trial. He has done everything possible within the legal system, yet he has been met with obstruction, silence, and injustice at every turn.

He was convicted by a panel of judges at the Landgericht, Tübingen —one presiding judge and two lay judges (Schöffen) who have no legal background. In theory, these lay judges represent the public. In reality, they completely rely on the presiding judge for legal interpretation.

Here’s the problem: Judicial deliberations are entirely secret. If a biased presiding judge misapplies the law or manipulates the lay judges, it can never be discovered or corrected.

In this case, the presiding judge exploited this flaw. After deliberations, he publicly stated his reasons for the verdict. But in his legally binding written judgment, he:
• Altered witness statements
• Misrepresented key facts
• Omitted crucial testimony

One of the most shocking aspects was that the judge completely erased a key legal argument presented by the defense. The defense had cited past rulings and asked critical questions, yet in the official written judgment, this entire discussion was omitted, creating a different perspective. What the judge said in court in his oral reasoning was completely different from what he wrote down.
By distorting the facts, he crippled the defendant’s ability to challenge the verdict in the Oberlandesgericht.

In Germany, a revision is extremely limited—no witnesses are heard. The review only focuses on legal and procedural errors, not factual disputes, as every fact the presiding judge writes is termed correct. But here’s where it gets worse:
The higher courts (Landgericht) do not keep official transcripts of proceedings.
Without detailed trial records, it becomes impossible to contest manipulated facts. If a corrupt judge distorts a verdict, the defense is powerless. The system protects judges, not justice.

The defense fought to get answers. They repeatedly asked the judge to explain why he had changed the facts, or at least clarify the issue to the Oberlandesgericht. But he refused.
• Calls were made to the judge. He promised to explain; he did not.
• A Gegenvorstellung (formal objection) was filed with the court. No response.
• Judges in Germany are not legally required to explain why they omitted key facts or altered witness statements in their written judgments.

Even more disturbing: The defense lawyer contacted the public prosecutor, who had been a witness to the trial and knew what was actually said in court. He admitted to the correct statements. But when asked to act, he said: "I cannot do anything."
This is like witnessing a crime and being unable to intervene.

A formal complaint was filed against the judge, but the Vice President of the Landgericht Tübingen refused to take action. He dismissed the complaint, stating that it did not fall under supervisory authority and that the actions of the judge fall under judicial independence. Does altering, misrepresenting, and omitting key witness statements fall under such law? His response probably mean the judge was not even asked to issue a statement. Further complaints were forwarded to the president of the Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart and later to the Ministry of Justice, yet nothing was done.

The defendant, a severely disabled migrant, went to court in person to demand justice. He was told to leave. However, as he exited the building, his severe disability hindered his ability to descend the stairs quickly; a security officer pushed him down the stairs because he "wasn’t moving fast enough."
He fell and hit his head on the floor.
What if he had lost his life?
This is the German justice system. A man fighting for his legal rights is physically assaulted inside a courthouse.

The Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Stuttgart, whose role includes ensuring lawful proceedings and representing the state in revision (appeal) cases, has been contacted but has chosen not to act. They have the opportunity to intervene in the public interest, especially in cases involving systemic failures.
The fact that a public prosecutor was a witness to the actual statements made in court is deeply concerning. Why don’t they ask him for clarification? Why don’t they question the two Schöffen?
Instead, they will likely support a judgment that was highly flawed and manipulated. Does that truly serve the public interest? This raises a serious question: Would a judge ever do the same against the prosecution in court? I believe we all know the answer. The fact that the Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart will uphold a judgment about which there are complaints without asking the judge for clarification is highly alarming. Is that even justice?

This issue has long existed within the German judiciary, and the blame should not rest solely on the system itself. The Bar Association (Rechtsanwaltskammer) has failed defendants by not upholding their right to a fair trial. They should have played a stronger role in advocating for a fair and transparent legal system, ensuring that judicial misconduct does not go unchecked. One cannot forget the highly publicized YSL RICO trial in the United States. If this case had taken place in Germany, would the defendants have had a fair chance at justice? I leave the answer to you.

Criminal investigations should not be the primary remedy for unlawful actions by biased and criminally minded judges, as they are unlikely to succeed. Multiple reports show German prosecutors refusing to charge police officers and judges, even with profound evidence of misconduct to court.

An Open Question to the German Judiciary, Ministries of Justice, and Decision-Makers:

When a biased or corrupt judge manipulates the facts in a Landgericht ruling, how can this be remedied to protect the individual’s rights? Since the revision process cannot address such deficiencies, what other mechanisms are in place to ensure justice and protect the rights of the individual?

Please do not say filing a constitutional complaint (Verfassungsbeschwerde) to the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht, BVerfG), as how can one even prove what was said in court without a transcript or detailed protocol? Let’s not forget the extremely low success rate of around 5%, notwithstanding the extremely high cost of hiring a specialized constitutional lawyer.

Why is there a detailed transcript or protocol at the Amtsgericht, which is a less significant court, but not at the Landgericht? Many lawyers claim that any attempt to request verbatim statements would likely be denied by the judge, leaving the lawyer at risk of antagonizing the court.

Does serving as a judge mean they are beyond reproach, with no laws in place to enforce better accountability and transparency? Judges are human beings, capable of bias or criminal intentions, and should be held to a higher standard of responsibility.

It seems the German judiciary believes that when a judge is employed, they automatically become "saintly" and "christlike," as there are no remedies to fix certain criminal behaviors.

The Basic Law of Germany is fundamentally undermined in this case.

Article 103 – Right to be Heard:
"In the course of any judicial proceedings, the parties to the case must be given an opportunity to present their case and be heard."
Was the severely disabled migrant heard in this case? Was it a fair trial? Clearly not.

Article 92 – Judiciary and Judicial Independence:
"Judges shall be independent and subject only to the law."
But if judges do not abide by the law, what can possibly protect an individual's rights?

It is important to reference a statement by former Stuttgart Regional Court judge, Frank Fahsel, who said:
"I was a judge at the Stuttgart Regional Court from 1973 to 2004, and during that time I experienced unbelievable and countless violations of the law and perversions of justice organized by the system, which could not be challenged because they conformed to the system. I have encountered countless judges and public prosecutors who could simply be called 'criminal.' Yet, they were, and in some cases still are, sacrosanct—untouchable—because they acted 'per Ordre de Mufti' (i.e., on orders from above) or were covered by the system for the sake of their reputation... It is not possible to take action against such colleagues in the justice system because the system protects itself from being exposed."

This statement corroborates the issues faced by the severely disabled migrant. For over 20 years, such unlawful actions have been observed by the noble ex-judge, Frank Fahsel, and it is tragic that even today, no effective remedy has been implemented to address these injustices.

Interview with the Defendant in the Case (Name withheld due to security reasons)

Q: What was your experience like during and after the trial?
A: In court, everything seemed fine, to be honest. The reasons he gave in court didn’t make sense, so we were waiting for the written judgment so the Oberlandesgericht could review it. When it arrived, my lawyer and I were shocked. The judge ignored key evidence, altered statements, and completely erased my lawyer’s arguments from the final judgment. It felt like the verdict had been decided before the trial even started."

Q: Did you try to challenge the verdict?
A: "Yes, but there was no way to prove what was actually said in court. Without transcripts, how do you fight back? The system protects itself."

Q: How has this affected your life?
A: "My life has been tough—I’ve been highly suicidal and incredibly depressed. I am devastated and praying to God for strength. I am searching for support, but it’s really tough to find someone to help. It has been traumatic."

Q: Why did you not report the individual who pushed you down the staircase to the police?
A: "If a judge could do this to me, will you trust anyone involved in the judiciary? I know there are good individuals, but this incident creates doubt in me."

Q: Why are you speaking out? Aren’t you afraid of any repercussions?
A: "Well, I have already said I can die for the truth. Yes, it might sound extreme, but I only feel for my mother (laughs). If a judge can do this in front of my lawyer, what about those who cannot even afford legal fees? What about refugees? Other migrants? He would never do this to the prosecution."

Q: What’s next for you?
A: "We are waiting for the outcome of the revision, though there is little hope because of the judge’s actions. I just hope that someone remembers the oath they swore and upholds justice."

Q: I want to tell you that you are one brave man. Your strength is exemplary, and I wish you the best.
A: "Thank you very much."

The German judiciary is undermining human rights to protect its reputation. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) and the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) must intervene. This issue has persisted for too long and must be addressed. Individuals’ rights should be upheld by law, not left to the discretion of judges. Reforms, such as mandatory court transcripts or audio recordings at all levels, should be implemented. Additionally, judges must be held accountable and promptly address any irregularities that undermine the right to a fair trial, as identified by either the defense or prosecution.

https://medium.com/@stanleonx/judicial-independence-or-impunity-the-dark-side-of-the-german-judiciary-98e4115f3e58

It's hard for you guys to understand that so.e persons are born different.

Kobojunkie:
First question, one of God's instructions to Christians is that they do not fight against their enemies, but here you admit to fighting against yours, so how does that make you a Christian?
Maybe you should drop the Christian act as that might help you better along your journey to figuring out who you are.

As for your "ability" to fight spirits, exactly why do you need to fight against these spirits when you were born with powers that you claim protect you and guard you from harm?

You claim you speak in languages and fire fills the room. What exactly is the benefit this "ability" offers you?

Only the like minds can believe or understand.

MufasaLion:
If you can do something paranormal to me positively, I will believe you.

The thing is in nairaland you meet people who joke with everything.

MufasaLion:
Can you visit me in Mars?

Do you have idea what this is about, can you connect with my spirit?

donbachi:
We plenty

I am not joking.

KnownUnknown:
I am like you.
To confirm that you are among the initiated, tell me what I am doing at the moment.

After that, meet me in the spirit realm tonight.

I have to open this account because I really don't want to be known, I am currently based outside the country and doing quite well, but currently I am trying to find my spiritual being.

I am one of this guys who is blessed with tremendous spiritual powers from birth who protects me and guards me from harm, i also can heal certain spiritual sicknesses too. One thing I know I have is the power of words, whoever I do curse struggles and may eventually die(story for another day). I am termed level 1 in the spiritual realm, I mean I am top of the charts. I am Christian and I pray with the name of God I do not have connections with the devil as I am always fighting against them, but I do not understand myself to be honest, who am I? I interact with the dead, sometimes I can invoke the dead, all this happen in my dreams, my spirit leaves my body fights my enemies and come back in, when I speak in languages fire fills the room (only the spiritual can see this). I can change situations singlehandedly. Spirit's dare not look me in the eyes.



Is there someone who is like me? Is there someone who understands what this is? What is going on? Who am I? I need someone who understands this, someone stronger. No jokes


Lalasticlala