Memesticmeme:


I think i'm more of the second class

okay...I'll have to be as logical as possible...since u still believe in God but not religion....I will try not to quote any scriptures (I don't expect u to take any scriptural quote serious anyway)

when God created man in the universe he created us to operate in four dimensions: length, depth, breath(xyz) and time (t)...in other words at the "beginning" (x,y,z,t)= (0,0,0,0) but mind u...he created it and placed us in it..he doesn't exist in it. that means he is not bounded by those dimensions (I can create a pencil and not give it a "dimension" called living..but living actually exist ). it is because of this that he can exist everywhere OMNIPRESENT ((x,y,z) from zero to infinity) and also be the BEGINNING AND THE END (time t from zero to infinty)

as God is not "detectable" with our senses, spacial orientation and boundaries we have to find other means of getting to know him. It is just natural...since he created us as intelligent beings.
Religions across the world are all for this purpose. Their practice vary from each group's history, environment , culture and most times political goals. but note one common thing ...getting to know God is an IDEAL thing....ways of knowing him are subject to each human's perception and imperfections. That's were ur role comes in....IN WAT WAY WILL U WANT TO KNOW HIM.as it is not always smart to reinvent the wheel..u can still choose from the available religions around and adopt what u term as acceptable in that religion. But mind u are free to create urs.

@op.

please let me know the class ur thoughts are.

1. the class that believe their is NO God anywhere or

2. the class that believe their is A God somewhere but all our religions are fake.

I need to know...to know were my argument begins.

all u doctors spewing trash in defense of ur institutions...God is watching u.

What we could still leave for another day's debate is the technical competence of medical doctors in this country...but what cannot be debated is the appalling customer service they render in most hospitals especially government owned.

This is not the first and will not be the last time our hospitals make"insufficient " diagnosis.
I have had a personal experience of three different hospitals (one private two government)giving different diagnoses on an ailment all due to lackadaisical attitude to service delivery.

ACCORDING TO LUTH's RESPONSE what was being treated "all this while" was "intra abdominal mass". I am sure it wasn't the patient that asked them to treat her for that, they must have "diagnosed" that. the patient tried other places when her situation wasn't improving and got another "diagnoses". Brought it back, luth then called three specialist to "properly" look into the issue. Luth now"tentatively discovered" "abdominal malignancy". well not sure, but both don't sound the same. if things were properly done i believe the right treatment would have been administered long before now with possibly no reason for all this drama.

u are bullying this guy for "assuming" while ur counter arguments are all based on assumptions too.