Lookmun's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Lookmun's Profile › Lookmun's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 (of 11 pages)
kedeojo:We have been conditioned to think that the bigger the project the better but in reality, that might not always be the case. For example while an airport is a good project and can be called a signature project, many times state governments build airports when there are other very pressing needs left unattended to. Good governance is beyond signature projects. It’s about touching people in areas where they need the most intervention. |
Any such weighty allegation from EFCC without corresponding naming and shaming will always end in the thief-catcher obtaining (or stealing) the loot and then a win-win agreement is made between the thief and the thief-catcher so that the thief gets a soft landing. Since the name of the offender is not publicly known, nobody really follows up with the case - whether the thief is duly prosecuted or not and the thief-catcher smiles home with the loot. Is this what you guys want? |
More money available without the right system of accountability only means more money to loot. |
Bluntemperor:You need to understand that Kyari has a boss. If his boss should spotlight his shenanigans, all these will end but if the boss is a beneficiary of the shenanigans, the lies will continue even if Kyari is fired today. |
Flame333:The report says oil bunkering will not stop because there are collaborators in multiple military formations. My problem is that these people have a higher authority above them. There is a chief of army staff for God’s sake. We can’t expect a bloody mechanic or teacher or banker to address the issue. It has to be from the top. When there are complaints of misbehavior in a particular department of an organization, the CEO will ask, “who heads this department?” Once the person is put on spotlight, there will be definite changes for sure. |
@Nairalanda1 was already using the “completed refinery” as proof that removal of subsidies is the problem with functional refineries. I will say it again and again, if you don’t fix the corruption in that sector, all the things that are supposed to work normally and effortlessly in that sector will just somehow “miraculously” fail to work. |
Tflex01:If the government of the day actually fixes the refineries and evidence is clear for all to see that refining is going on, the antagonists will shut up and you will have have converts from some of your critics. What we have today is a government that prefers propaganda and make-believe stories and are not willing to roll their sleeves and get the job done. In this case you cannot expect your critics to suddenly fall in love with the government. Somebody has been arguing on Nairaland that subsidy is the cause of non-functional refineries in Nigeria but I have consistently disagreed with that view and maintained that the secrecy, opaqueness and corruption by government officials is the biggest bottleneck because oil business is the biggest source of money for them. |
Philosophic:I don’t understand what you mean by it should not be prioritized. Both items can be pursued simultaneously. It is a very good policy that would make governance better. A country like Nigeria shouldn’t be having a system where the electoral umpire is in the apron of the executive. We’ve practiced this system forever. The best time to change was yesterday and the next best time is now. If we procrastinate till tomorrow, there will be other excuses why then wouldn’t be the right time. |
Philosophic:Section 143 speaks about how a president can be removed from office I believe. It still boils down to the balance of power between the executive arm and the institutions that are supposed to check its excesses. And so long as the executive is so powerful that the institutions that check it can’t lay a glove on it, then it is going to be difficult to unseat this executive office holder no matter the offense he/she commits. Hence, any call for true independence of the electoral umpire is a very welcome one and anyone who means well for the future of Nigeria should encourage it. |
adamusuleiman3:“Who contributed the VAT” is a more superior metric than “where the VAT came from.” And I think FIRS would have data of the contributors including their states of origin. This is something that a computer system can help to plot the graph and then we would be able to see the states that contributed the most to the VAT purse. This is not excusing bad leadership in the south east though. |
Philosophic:The house is burning because of lack of consequence for bad governance. If governors or presidents can return to office when they fail simply because they control all the systems responsible for choosing leaders, it means that there is little incentive to try to perform. Until we realize that healthy systems and the rule of law are central to progress, we’d be running round in circles. Therefore you underestimated the rat not knowing that the rat is causing the fuel spillage that exacerbates the fire. |
[quote author=Philosophic post=133005598][/quote]There is no way to compare having an electoral body independent of the executive and the way we’ve always had it. If you think elections in Nigeria are the way elections should be with those who control the security machinery and the umpire being involved in elections, just wait till you have very desperate leaders. Paul Biya of Cameroon ruling for 39 years would be child’s play. Yesterday was the best time to do the right thing and today is the next best time to do the right thing. |
Igbos by nature are nomadic people. Though this data is an indictment on the porous level of governance in the south east not so much an indictment on south eastern investors. South eastern investors just like any rational investor would try to cash in on opportunities in Yola, Cameroon or in the North Pole if exists. We all can learn a thing or two from the enterprising spirit of the Igbo man as they are the ones that drive major markets such as Alaba International, Jankara, Ladipo, Oyingbo, Computer village, etc and even the ports. But their governance has to be better. 1. Northern states have proximity to country’s capital Abuja and there is a huge market in the Kardashian states that any investor would likely want to exploit such that even if the government does nothing, the business climate will still thrive 2. South-South states are blessed with natural oil resources such that even if the government is sleeping, there is enough VAT to be generated 3. South West’s proximity to Lagos (former state capital and always the country’s commercial capital coupled with an ever ready market of opportunities for any business man). Even if government sleeps, enough can be generated. South-East is the other hand has no special advantage so the ineptitude of their governance is being exposed seriously. Their sit-at-home stances and migration away to other locations will ensure that they score low on the VAT front. I think we should do a survey on state of origin of the actual contributors (business owners) to the VAT purse per state. E.g. for Lagos State, which states contribute the most VAT, etc. That will give us a better idea. @statisense, take note. |
TheBillyonaire:When we were clamoring and insisting that presidential candidates should honour debates, sone said it doesn’t matter. In a society where people vote for aspiring leaders that evade debates, we can’t expect any better than what we usually get. |
yemmit90:Are you then saying that in western countries, private individuals are not allowed to accumulate properties? I don’t think so. Maybe you should tell me which countries do this. In western countries, so long as you can afford to stack up and accumulate as many properties as you want, you can do so. In the western world you can accumulate properties as Mr Andrew or Andrew Ltd and it doesn’t have to have any connections with the government. This is capitalism guided by enforceable laws. It drives competition and innovation and ultimately grows the economy. Also there are so many micro, small and medium enterprises in the western world. You don’t have to be a limited liability company before you can operate. In fact you may not even need to be in the stock market to operate. The egg produces the chicken but the chicken is the initial source of the egg. In the same vein, the society produces the leaders but leadership enforcement of law and order is the initial factor that influences societal behavior. This means that if a country was good but the administration of law and order (which is a leadership function) breaks down, the society will become more and more lawless as time goes on. Also, when an organization or system is bad and the leaders decide to correct the anomalies and begin to punish wrong behavior and ensure that the right behaviors are enforced, sooner than later, that system or organization begins to change for the better. If a system or organization or society is bad today, it can be better tomorrow. If a society can be good without the intervention of leaders, there would be no real need for leaders. If a country can steer its affairs and maintain law and order without leaders, there would be no need for leaders. But it’s impossible. Even if people are greedy, if laws are effective to punish wrong behavior, whether you are Donald Trump that wanted to be president when he lost the election, they will have to behave rightly by force. Infact most humans are greedy because they think about themselves and their families primarily. The reason why a greedy individual will still behave in an acceptable way in the society is if: a) regulations are effective meaning that if you do wrong (cheat to gain etc), you will likely be caught b) the laws are not selective and are applicable no matter who is involved. Meaning that even if you are Donald Trump, if you mess up, you will face the music. That greedy person will have no choice but to behave in an acceptable manner. But in some other places, because the regulation is not strong, you will likely getaway with wrongdoing and even if you get caught eventually, the laws can be bypassed on your behalf if you have the money or connection. No matter the good idea being suggested, it is the leaders that still need to implement it. But they will never implement it if it favours them. That’s why the people need to come together and look away from those things that divide us and demand good leadership. That’s how it s done everywhere. Nations overcome bad leadership when they come together any where in the world. In the western world you can’t find people arguing about manual collation of votes vs electronic transmission. They will compel the leaders to embrace electronic transmission but if you come here they will tell you that it doesn’t matter. |
Apel147:We were not always like this. As the system of justice and law and order continued to break down, societial values began to diminish. If you hear children today say that they will steal money when they get to power, it was a strange thing to say many years back. When the head is faulty, the body takes the shape of the head. Even if you carry Americans and put them in a place where there is opportunity to do wrong and get away with it, it’s just a matter of time, they will be grossly corrupt. |
yemmit90:To be fair to Africa, industrialization was built on the backs of the black race. Not only were they enslaved for centuries, structures were put by colonizers that make it very difficult to break away from the shackles. It’s called neo-imperialism (a modern form of slavery). However, the right leadership will solve any of these problems. Humans generally have an innate tendency for greed, selfishness and tendency to dominate others. The white man is included if not they will not have enslaved the black race. In Nigeria we have leaders and the people. We have not really had leaders of integrity not because there are no great leaders with integrity in the society but because the SYSTEM that brings in leaders make it difficult for the good ones to come in. If American citizens should live in a society where the executive appoints and pays the electoral umpire and the justices, law and order will break down. They can’t escape it. Chinese people do all manner of things here that they can’t do in their home BECAUSE OUR SYSTEM ALLOWS IT. The solution to this problem is for the people to come together and demand accountability from the leaders but unfortunately when some people say they want to do that, some other people will act as detractors mainly because of tribe, religious leaning and political affiliation. Because the politicians know that people defend them even when they do wrong, it emboldens them to do more wrong with impunity. If a people movement will succeed, it has to have unity, solidarity and cohesion. What you have in Nigeria is that when some people are protesting bad governance, some will say that the government is good so there is no real cohesion. When some people want to push to ensure that the electoral umpire is truly independent, some others will insist that the umpire should remain under the umbrella of the executive. That’s the real problem. You say the solution is to remove private ownership of property? I guess you are advocating for communism system where the government owns the property and government feeds the people. Even if it was the solution, who will implement it when government officials see politics as the highest business in the land. That leads us to the real problem - leadership. So long as leadership is the way it is, you may have 1000 great ideas but they will intentionally frustrate it because the are gaining very much from the status quo. That’s why the people have to compel the leaders to do the right thing. Any where in the world where leadership has a change of behavior, it was the people that pushed for it. But as I highlighted earlier, we are too divided along fault lines of tribal, religious and political affiliation that it becomes very hard for the citizens to have a common front. America and the western world did not overcome their problems through socialism or communism so that’s not really the solution. Their leaders in the past institutionalized the right behaviors and it became a culture to them over the years. Whenever their leaders were doing rubbish, they were not defending their leaders. That’s the difference. |
Apel147:We are not all bad. Many Nigerians are doing great and commendable things home and abroad. Individuals do not have state powers or instruments of coercion to enforce the right behaviors that will correct societal ills. If a people could govern themselves without leaders, there would be no use for leaders. A wise man said “everything rises and falls on leadership.” |
yemmit90:The assertion “no black man/Nigerian is free from corruption” sounds like what a lady whose heart has been broken again and again might say that “all men are scum.” Neither of these hasty generalizations are correct. The fact that society has been getting worse and worse because the administration of justice and the system of law and order has been consistently broken down doesn’t mean that all Nigerians are terrible. Back to your point, nobody is advocating absolute powers to anyone. We are simply saying let there be true separation of powers such that when A’s powers end, B’s powers begin etc etc. What we have today is a situation where the people that are supposed to check the powers of the executive are under his apron. Even if you have that system in the USA for decades, there will be a societal decadence in the USA. If you want to address fundamental issues, these are the issues to look at. If the administration of justice and the system of law and order is non-existent in any place - Canada, Uganda or Mongolia - the effects are the same, it’s just a matter of time. So if someone is recommending that the electoral umpire is truly free from the aprons of the executive BUT STILL SUBJECT TO THE LAWS OF THE LAND, it’s only a fraudulent person that would kick against it. All these things that you mention that government should start doing - free education, care for children and the aged, employment, etc. Why will the government do these things when they know that they have the power to elect themselves even though they failed during their tenure? If it was possible for a people to govern themselves without leadership, then there would be no need for leaders. If leadership is faulty in a society you cannot expect the society to function orderly. It’s just like parents that spend that have young kids but spend time in different ogogoro joints. If the children turn out irresponsible, it’s not going to be a surprise. If you are wondering why those children turn out as riff-rafts without addressing the root cause, it’s similar to expecting a good society from bad leadership. Anywhere in the world, once the MSMEs are given support and an enabling environment, they grow and begin to employ more and more and contribute to the growth of the economy. People steal because of all the following: 1. There is uncertainty about tomorrow 2. The opportunity arises 3. They know that if they are caught, so long as they have the money or connection to cover it up, they will likely get away with it. 4. The first and second points speak to failure of government to provide a economic security to the populace in the midst of abundant God-given wealth and that’s why people try to get wealth at all cost and once the slightest opportunity opens up to be fraudulent, they grab it. The third point speaks to consequence management. People know that it’s who you know or what you have that determines the consequence for your punishment. In a society where enforcement of the law is based on what you have and how connected you are to the powers that be, how will people be motivated to do what is right? In fact some people that do the right thing get punished by the system and there is no reprieve for them. When you obey the law (as a female for example) and you are diligent in civil service but you are stagnant and yet your colleagues who warm the bed of permanent secretary are getting promoted, how do you want to advise such a person to do the right thing. If the leadership system is faulty, the society cannot be good. In summary any attempt for change in society without leadership is a waste of time. Individuals don’t have state powers or instruments of coercion to enforce right behaviors but when the people that have these powers use it to acquire unusual wealth, amass more and more power, then you cannot have a good society. |
I thought I had heard the worst when someone was trying to prove on nairaland that manual collation is better and more full-proof than electronic transmission. Now people are flying the kite that it doesn’t matter if the INEC remains in the apron of the executive. Since I can remember, the INEC has always been in the pocket of the executive and that’s why we see what we see today. Can we first try the system of independence of the umpire guided by the constitution and punishable by law if found wanting before you conclude that it wouldn’t work just because of who you support? The implication of what we have is that the performance of the umpire would be determined by how desperate or tolerant the ruling party is to opposition. If the ruling party is not to keen on winning at all costs, then maybe you can see power being shared by the ruling party and the opposition party but God help you, the moment you have a ruling party that stops at nothing until they win by any means possible, some people need to realize that instititions are being destroyed. Be careful what you wish for because if you think that we have reached our worst in Nigeria, you are not thinking deep enough. How do you think some of all these funny African leaders rule for 39 years straight? They broke down every institution and then it became possible. So if you think you are justifying broad day light wrongdoing because your favourite party - whether APC, PDP or LP is involved - then you have to have a hard look on yourself. |
Philosophic:Let’s stop deceiving ourselves. You claim that the INEC will be no better if they appoint their leadership through a transparent process and if they are remunerated in a clearly defined process totally outside the jurisdiction of the executive. When have we tried it before to see if it will succeed? So you think that executive choosing the INEC head and being heavily involved in their recruitment is better? In what way is it better please? |
yemmit90:I disagree. The reason why things are getting worse in the system that you are familiar to is because the checks and balances that restrains excesses in governance are being destroyed. It’s because for a long time, in the system you are used to, reward and appointment has a lot to do with the executive arm. Why won’t the umpire be getting worse and worse in that situation? If the executive have no business selecting and remunerating them, then there is still some hope that they will do the right thing. If on the other hand the executive appoints and rewards them, there is no hope at all. Don’t justify the wrongdoing of executive meddling with INEC with the excuse that it won’t be better. I expect any responsible Nigerian that desires the best for his or her country to desire independence of the INEC. At least let’s try that since we have tried the other system for so long. |
Ayoefa:The IREV system that was fine for other elections suddenly crashed with presidential? Wow thank you very much. Let’s turn a blind eye to the shenanigans that happen in collation centers where security operatives threaten and ensure that opposition is dealt with right? If you and Tinubu are sure that you will win the next presidential polls, let them push to ensure that electronic transmission is compulsory. Simple! |
Ayoefa:USA is a bit too far. Monies were spent for electronic transmission which worked in other situations but somehow “failed” in the presidential polls so that wuruwuru manual collation could hold sway. Enjoy the presidency of your candidate but we are not fools, your candidate didn’t win that election in actual terms. |
RealityOfReason:So long as the executive has no business with appointing or funding them, there is hope that they will be above board. The reason why the current ones are fantastically corrupt is because they are tied to the aprons of the executive and so resistance to the shenanigans of political actors is non-existent. |
Ken4Christ:I don’t think there’s any such arrangement. At least it has not come to the public knowledge as far as I know and there is no point assuming that’s the case. What I think is that Dangote, as a business man has a target price that would enable him break even at a targeted period bye cause he’s got loans to offset and what not. Any serious government that knows the potential of what a Dangote would do to the economy would support it through waivers and the likes and discourage importation too via tariffs. The argument of monopoly doesn’t really hold water because if Dangote is seamless other investors would take advantage hopefully like telecoms. Or are we saying that importation should continue unabated (with its attendant shadiness and opaqueness) because we want to punish Dangote? |
Delete |
chidiokay: |
chidiokay:Very brilliant post in my opinion. Many seem to have been brainwashed and hoodwinked by constant propaganda spewed by this administration about deregulation. NNPC still fixes prices. And in fairness to Dangote, he can only sell based on his input cost plus a margin to be profitable because he had loans to pay and he hasn’t even broken even. |
chidiokay:Don’t get me wrong as I agree with most of your points. I think the only area where we are not aligned is sympathy for Dangote. If it was the government that was making all this outcry and take action about why 4 refineries aren’t productive after lots of monies spent and empty promises I’d be happy. You make a good point that it’s the duty of government is to protect local industries and this is why I fault not only this clueless APC regime but also their pathetic sympathizers. In fact I think many use this Dangote impasse as a smokescreen to continue their irrational support and if you see anybody on this thread that hasn’t criticized NNPCL and their cronies but they are always asking Dangote to reduce his price, they are the ones. My issue with Dangote is that he is trying to evoke sympathy from the populace so that he can have his way. In other words, he is trying to use social means to achieve a business goal. This is why I won’t be dragged in their fight. All these talk of trying to get importers’ licenses banned and other actions are what I’m talking about. And to be honest, for most Nigerians price is a much bigger issue than quality since we have been buying the so-called lesser quality fuel all our lives. It’s not like the higher quality fuel will do anything much significantly different and so could it be that Dangote erred in presuming quality to be high on Nigerians wishlist as he thought that they wouldn’t mind paying a premium. It’s seems unlikely that Nigerians would be interested in promoting Dangote’s dream at a premium cost to themselves if the benefit they get is “FX savings” which they never get to enjoy from anyway because of the same poor governance. What exactly is Dangote asking for? Is he saying that government should ban all the importers of fuel? That’s government’s call (whether to increase tariffs for imports or introduce outright bans but he insisting on that is not his call. If they were engaging in sharp practices thereby hampering his business, then he can ask the regulator to come hard on the dubious practitioners. But in this case, the importers are also doing business (selfish or not - in fact all business people need some level of good selfishness) and he cannot force the hand of the law or government to cut off their hands. |
chidiokay:Good point but we need to look at all sides. I know these NNPC guys and their co-plotters would rather have the sector and opaque as possible so that their shenanigans will continue but if I must play the devil’s advocate, I’d say that Dangote cannot win this war by smear campaign or going to court or NASS. To put in another way, he is in business and the guys he’s fighting are also in business (like them or hate them). He cannot use a social reason like the need to stop imports and save FX to try and force stoppage of importation. He should do it the business way - by trying to make their fuel uncompetitive and if reducing his price will be detrimental to his refining business, he needs to spell it out clearly by enumerating the cost implications. He is a business man not a public service personnel. Even if he’s able to demonstrate that reducing his price will make him uncompetitive, he still cannot force the arms of competitors to patronize him on his terms and he will need to find other ways. It’s why he’s in business. |
Ken4Christ:They say oil and gas margins are pretty low. What if that price reduction is detrimental to his refining business. |

that is the reality of the market dangote found himsef. except standard is enforced dangote cant compete