Unlimited22:

I Do not mean this disrespectfully, but do you know how to read?

Loan someone who scored 14 goals with zero penalties in his first season in England? Who's already scored twice this season? Someone who can be a useful option seeing how many games we have?

Because I've been saying that we have a bigger problem conceding goals than scoring them? That our attacking talent is more than enough to produce goals?

Omo. Na wa

are you just finding out that airmark do not read properly?

andrewbaba44:


Estevao Dey ball sha

this guy if he continues like this will give that RW enough competition

BlewMahn:
Happy with Colwill's solid start to the season. Happy with Viega too. The rest CBs, I cannot vouch for.

viega was dormant in this game. Hardly understood his role.

Infact he and caicedo suffered our mildfield and made us to be playing tum tum tum

At all at all no bad, mk we take this one go home

Sanchooooo assist

Enzo absence was felt in this game

Ibime:
Another foolish cross from Kukuruku. Brainless football

not his game

Caicedo is definitely a blind bat

Ibime:
How these people never scored us na mystery

Na the Maresca ball be dis?

there is no controller in that game.

The two mildfielders are passing mainly back wards

Wetin be all this unnecessary card

This Taylor dy blow rubbish

Jackson bend it well

Disasi too clumsy

Make this half finish

Sanchez mpa

Another defense calamity

See disasi

Another angle

airmark:


You dont want your wasteful Jackson to be replaced by 100m, 40m or 30m striker. You are an enemy of progress. You can't hide under 100m.

if we ask you to produce their goals this season, you will tell us to give them 40 days and 40 nights to adjust

airmark:


We are talking about a 100m stupidly spent. Something that should have been used to buy one or two quality strikers better than your wasteful Jackson.

the club spent it on support cast , because they know strikers do not even get to score 70% of total team goals.

Common sense

airmark:


But it was smart to have spent 100m on KDH, Jorgensen and Felix, who have not started any league match.

Chelsea now in the hands of quacks like you.

the same way you think they are also smart to spend 50-60M on neto

airmark:


You wanted us to stick to your wasteful Jackson, while I wanted his upgrade.



Work rate isonu.

you have no point.

Because I showed I clearly wanted gykores. Chelsea doesn’t have to spend 100M only on him.

airmark:


Despite the fact that Barca had Messi and Neymar, they broke the bank to pay a record fee on a striker, Suarez. They won 5 trophies that season he joined them. He won them 13 trophies in 6 years.

Do you know how much Haaland costs City per week?

Obviously, you and those handling players recruitment at Chelsea are not smart and that's why we are not a title contender again this season with a terrible striker leading the line.




Lordfalcao: Jackson outside the box is top tier too, we don't need to pay big amount for any striker.

The team that scored 77 league goals last season. Knows they don’t need to spend 100M just to get a striker.(one player)

Other big teams looking for strikers how many paid 100M?


There is no HAALAND in the market

airmark:


You are always arguing against buying a top player that would tremendously upgrade our team. That's the same way you were strongly against getting VVD.

Now, you wanted to claim a support for a Gyokeres that you didn't want us to buy. If not that I exposed you, you would have been flying his kite. Shame on you.

We saw how the support cast failed to score more than 1 goal against a Cristal Palace that West Ham netted twice at Selhurst. If it's by support cast, Fraudiola wouldn't have gone all out for Haaland after getting disgraced by Chelsea in the Ucl final.

I know you always don't want Chelsea to upgrade to beast mode, the question is why?

March 18th

lordfalcao:
Chelsea should go for this sporting striker.

We don’t need to spend 100M on one striker or any player again.


We should be smart

airmark:


Shut up. You didn't want us to buy him.



Each time Jackson misses a big chance and cost us a match, all Chelsea fans are supposed to give you a knock on your head.

understanding English is hard for you.

Gykores is a notable option.

Commands a high fee.

We don’t need to spend 100M on a striker. It is not the department on the squad that needs the quickest fix..

We know how much the club spent in trying to get good support cast.

Because they know it’s not the job of a striker to score all the goals for the team

airmark:



Why are you avoiding Gyokeres and Dovbyk? They are the ones I preferred to your wasteful Jackson.

everybody here talks about gyokeres, so don’t sound as if you discovered gold.

How many goals did dovbyk scored in this international break ?

airmark:


Jackson for Senegal

15 matches, No goal.

They cursed him again yesterday when he missed big chances as usual.

Good that you didn't mention Gyokeres, Dovbyk and Guirassy.

belloti for Italy?

Scamaca for Italy?


How many did they score yesterday?

airmark:


I tagged you because you prefer a striker that is wasteful inside the box but can show work rate outside of the box.

I prefer strikers that are better than belotti or scamaca.

Jackson is one of them

airmark:


Lordfalcao: Jackson outside the box is top tier too.

the same airmark..

airmark:
We should not take Osimhen again abeg. He may flop as he didn't even have preseason with us and may not be in good shape to hit the ground running.

Why are you tagging me that Osimhen scored as if I am against his success?

swiz123:


Then why are you gaslighting Osimhen for kicking their stupid offer out of the window?

I hope the reason why Osimhen fired his agent is for him responding to any of Chelsea mails.

pointing out that Osihmen claimed Chelsea arm twisted him that he was looking for 500k

Or that the total offer the club gave him was 130k?


I pointed out his lies finish. Osihmen nobi my relative .

airmark:


The point is, you use little information you have to argue blindly and stupidly.

Same thing you did in Lukaku-Conte's case for years, even in the face of concrete proof.

Point still remains. Osimhen can still be saying the truth with sprinkled lies.

I have pointed it out

BlueRayDick:


What are u even saying? Chelsea is pricing a player bigger than their budget; they should be the one to either increase their budget or walk away.

Why are u pained Osimehn is telling his own side of the story? Are u a lover of one-sided stories?

pained in what way?

I said there is some lies in his interviews.

That Chelsea is trying to arm twist him that he is looking for 500k is one of them.

So why will I be pained ?


I am not emotional like you people. Maybe your response was not meant for me