ShyNeptune:

haha. hilarious.



good to know the Klee.k moniker has finally been confined.

see monkey oooooooooo

yhemsy62:
alright. But tell me did I get it?

The answer is 3.

The stripes were correct but it should have been a rectangle not a triangle

yhemsy62:
4

close.

PassingShot:

Kleek/makten or whatever other moniker you bear, you have been roundly whipped by people with higher level of intelligence and better capacity for logical reasoning.

Shut up and hide your face in shame!

bla bla bla. I went 1 vs 50 and annihilated every single one of you.

PassingShot:

Perhaps you meant to type 13.0 or 30. You've not proved you're intelligent. You've only made us know you're educated, pompous, uncultured and generally ill-mannered.

I have zero respect for you guys, if that isnt obvious. It means nothing to me if you think im intelligent or not.

Get over it, i don't care.

To me i am in an online zoo talking to orangutans. What the orangutans think means nothing to me

If anyone wants to know why Africa is in the condition it is in this thread displays why. Finally i understand why the world hates blacks

This is why i have absolutely zero respect for you guys. The only things you guys have done on this thread is make blind brainless assumptions

cola:


Make up your mind, fella. You in one breath said those set of questions were 100X more difficult than the first two picture patterns questions and that you didn't expect anyone to get them right. Now guys here have made light work of your 'big deal' you turn round and say they are only general knowledge questions and don' t show IQ.

Swallow your pride and admit you overrate yourself.

Good job, Passingshot and clique.

This is what makes you guys so stupid, you make assumptions blindly and then argue for them like they are a divine revelation

The reason why i didn't expect you guys to know those questions is because they are only representative of people who grew up in western society. Millers Analogy test was developed for American Students, that is what makes them 100X harder monkey. Learn to follow what someone is actually saying and if you are unsure or it is ambiguous ask for clarification. Brainless assumptions are the mark of a dumb person.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_Analogies_Test

If you want an actual difficult culture fair IQ question look at the picture in my last post.

ShyNeptune:

lol. obviously.....

munkieboi

Since the dawn of history the negro has owned the continent of Africa

- rich beyond the dream of poet's fancy, crunching acres of diamonds beneath his bare black feet. Yet he never picked one up from the dust until a white man showed to him its glittering light.

His land swarmed with powerful and docile animals, yet he never dreamed a harness, cart, or sled. A hunter by necessity, he never made an axe, spear, or arrowhead worth preserving beyond the moment of its use. He lived as an ox, content to graze for an hour. In a land of stone and timber he never sawed a foot of lumber, carved a block, or built a house save of broken sticks and mud.

With league on league of ocean strand and miles of inland seas, for four thousand years he watched their surface ripple under the wind, heard the thunder of the surf on his beach, the howl of the storm over his head, gazed on the dim blue horizon calling him to worlds that lie beyond, and yet he never dreamed a sail!

imhotep:
you forgot to include the projections for ebola

lucky for you the white man can cure Ebola.

Kinda shatters your narrative doesn't it. Whites aren't scared of your black ass.

AAinEqGuinea:
The author is extremely malleable; one year she's a soul sistah on fire for everything black, the next year she's a proud mammy on the front page of ghetto gaggers... Raven Symone is the latest diva to grace their presence as well

Don't get me wrong, we black people have certain peculiarities about us. So do white people, not everything about them is supercilious. It seems logical to the author to suddenly jump in whitey's parade as a result of reading conservative-leaning retorts and experiencing social ills of Nigeria.

Who knows what will guide her world proposition next... maybe master race aliens with master retort will transform her into a 'astronomical realist' next year

Being malleable is good, it means you are able to absorb information and are willing to admit you were wrong about something.

I share her sentiment in someways, i used to be an afrocentric but at a certain point i realized it was nothing more than insecure self delusion. As for her, she swung too far in the opposite direction and needs to kill herself. A black white nationalist is the most pathetic thing imaginable.

emperorgoke:
OP, what a nonsense write up, have you studied how India, China and Japan developed, they made their language number one priority, even in schools their lecturers teaches with their local language, what abt their native attire, the most expensive attire in the world is India attire cuz of the material. Subscribe to every stupid western policies e. g SAP, Austerity measure to facilitate development? Go nd read the consequences of these two western policies then come bk and argue with me. Economy is the superstructure of societal development not culture according to Carl Marx. If economy is good society will be fine nd develop and civilisation will penetrate, Society can develop with altering culture. Culture itself can facilitate development except genital mutilation or circumcision

Interesting! Now how will the economy develop when the people fight each other every few years and elect leaders based on ethnicity instead of competence?

Btw are you aware that Japan only speaks one major language family ( and actually had a policy of conflating its dialects into mainstream Japanese) while Nigeria speaks 250 very different languages and is making no attempt to homogenize them? did this basic difference escape you? As for India 40% of the population speaks Hindi, no other language carries more than 10% of the population. Despite their situation being a little better than Africas its still an impediment to their development and only works because many tribes and castes are completely marginalized

Africa needs to keep its large lingua francas (including English) and conflate is small oral languages into something that is more manageable, every successful country has done this. They recognize that excess linguistic diversity makes a country weaker

mzilakazi:


3

And why?

pkjag:


Good luck selling your ideas, I've also noticed that you generally have little to no understanding about how/what the general population thinks, feels and cares about, you are so removed from reality that it's hopeless trying to argue with you.

And yes you do make good arguments because I've been trying to advocate for more Swahili usage in my country and your ideas kind of almost rhyme with mine, but your attitude towards your fellow black man is rotten and is even infecting how you think and eventually how you will be making decisions, you are generally bitter and frustrated, it screams in your posts, be careful man not everybody is as accommodating and understanding as I am.

You think I don't understand what regular people think and care about, rest assured I do. I just don't care, they are stupid and i'm not really trying to convince a stupid person into my way of thinking. Low IQ people are convinced by rhetoric, not by logic. There is a time and place for rhetoric and it isn't here. What is done here is meaningless, If i decide to make a difference it will be in real life not on the internet.

Stop trying to diagnose a stranger on the internet, you don't know me. This is a whole lot more complicated than just being "bitter and angry,"If it was actually angry I wouldn't be able to shut it on and off like i do. The fact of the matter is; if you want to talk to the real me then give me a reasonable and logical reply and if you want to talk to my online alter ego you get the drill. I think that's fair. The people who deserve respect get respected and I get to save myself the torment of trying to reason with someone who doesn't respond to logic.

A big problem in this society is that low intelligence/knowledge people do not acknowledge their limitations or know their place. They think they can go from filling their brain with Nollywood, Kardashians and gossip and then go on to argue about linguistics. I respond to these types people in the way I feel is appropriate.

As for my opinion about blacks, they are not as extreme as I am portraying them with the "monkey" stuff but the situation is serious. I want to insult people and I want them to be offended. Their comfortable world of ineptitude, low IQ, scapegoating and ignorance needs to be shattered. No African has the right to be racially comfortable and secure while their race is in the condition that its in. I will stop calling blacks monkeys when blacks stop behaving like monkeys all over the world.

pkjag:

That is what I'm talking about, learn how to structure your argument so that they're fool proof, you do make good arguments, but these small mistakes are what brings about small misunderstandings and unnecessary criticisms. However even the smart people in Africa will have a hard time selling these ideas to the general masses who barely have a clue how these changes will directly benefit them.

You are only saying i make good arguments because I think that Swahili is a good language. If I had said Swahili was a regressive language you would be saying my arguments are "terrible racist bla bla bla"

I have no illusions about you people and your ability for critical unbiased thought. It is zero.

And no, I will not waste my time making my wording full-proof because the logic already is. I would be a fool would worry about the precise wording of my posts when I already know the audience will be a bunch of idiots who will not believe anything that hurts their feelings. I will continue to be blunt and generalize until I notice I am speaking to someone who deserves a higher level of consideration.

If you had come to me asking for clarification of what i meant i would have respected your post. However this is not what you did.

My consistency on this policy is water-tight. If your response is logical it will be respected, if it is emotional and illogical you will be insulted.

pkjag:


Intellectual honesty Dude don't make me laugh, you write that African languages are primitive, then in the same fucking paragraph you start advocating for Swahili, Lingala, etc to be the major languages in their regions. Where the Bleep did you go to school, because that in philosophy and argumentative logic is called a contradiction so go learn how to argue intelligently before you expect people like me who know their stuff to take you seriously.

You know what your problem is: It's not that you make invalid arguments, but that you make them and think that they are not falsifiable and when somebody points out a small blip you flip, call them morons and declare yourself more intelligent. No man, that isn't how people present their arguments and expect critical feedback.

Word of advice, you have massively unchecked behavioural issues, listen to what everybody is saying around you before you dig a hole too deep to jump out by yourself.

I did not say that all African languages are primitive and i did not say that some african languages primitive. I said "African languages are primitive" it can be inferred that this was a generalization. Generalizations are things that are generally true.

African languages are generally primitive and pointless to exist, there are some exceptions, which are the ones I listed.

bump

pkjag:

Yeah i can see why nobody takes you seriously, do you feel happy when you insult other people, do you feel special when you think you are more intelligent than the rest, we have a name for you where i come from.
Remember you were the first to note that African languages are regressive and primitive, if you are so intelligent you should know how to present your arguments logically without contradicting yourself, the fact that you can barely string together a logical argument tells a lot about how you think, probably why it's so hard to sell your ideas here to people who know their stuff.

I insult you because you act like morons. Act like a monkey and you will be treated like a monkey.

Is it so hard to actually read the thread before you post a response

Is this too much to ask?

Why do you expect to be treated with respect when you cant even read the title post of a thread before you respond to it? You people are completely braindead and i don't have to time to treat you nicely. You have to first respect intellectual honesty before i respect you.

pkjag:
Whoever stated that African languages do not have a word for yellow, should get off his high horse and travel around the continent. Swahili has almost every colour described, yellow is njano or manjano, a word that is derived from the name of a yellowish plant. In fact I don't think apart from Arabic there's any other African language as widely published and spoken as is Swahili. There are political, scientific, technical, etc dictionaries being published and developed every year by Kenyan and Tanzanian universities. So before you make your points do the proper research!!

It must be hard being a mental retard.

Read the original thread again

pleep:
Black people need to learn how to take pride in things because they are good, not just because they are old.

African languages are regressive, primitive and backwards. They serve no purpose but to divide African nations and cause hostility between peoples who are essentially the same. This is 2015 what the hell is the value of a language that doesn't even have a word for yellow, or have any measure of degree or even a vocabulary beyond a 10 year old level? Language is the fabric of thoughts and one who has a primitive, backwards language will have primitive and backwards thoughts.

This is why all pointless African tribes on this maps should be eliminated and formed into a few major groups; Lingala, Hausa, [size=18pt]Swahili[/size], Amharic, Somali, Arabic, Yoruba and Igbo. The only other language used in Africa should be English.

What the hell is so good about these "African cultures and traditions" anyway? Where these not the same cultures and traditions that left us 600 years behind the rest of the world? Wake the hell up and cut away this silly degenerate nonsense. It is only a hindrance to our development. We can start new cultures and new traditions, this trash doesn't have value just because its old.

learn to read you fucking idiot. sick of all these damn black morons all over this site

McSquishi:
. IQ is generally measured by tests developed in western nations and doesn't measure true intelligence.

I meant to say conscientiousness btw. This is a heritable trait that measures thoroughness, honesty and precision. It seems to be high in Japanese and German people and low in Africans. See "African Time."

Anyway, if IQ tests were developed in western nations and are thus "biased" why do the Asians outperform the whites who created the tests? Why does Mongolia, a country with the same GDP/capita as Nigeria, score 15 points higher than African Americans in the United States?

Intelligence is cognitive ability, the capacity for abstract thought and problem solving. The IQ test measures this pretty well and there is no reasonable way you could argue otherwise.

McSquishi:
It's clear you don't know what you're talking about. So funny. mtDNA does not and cannot denote a racial group. It will only give you information on what haplogroups your mitochondrial lineages belong to. That isn't race, that's simply ancestry. As I stated, there isn't an SNP, no gene that White ppl have that you can't find in an Asian or Black population. Meaning there is too much overlap between populations for the concept of race to hold water. If I'm wrong please share what mitochondrial lineage denotes White or Black or Asian or whatever racial groups u believe in.

Ethnicity cannot be traced. Ancestry can be traced. I belabored the Hispanic ethnicity example but you didn't get it apparently. When ppl have their matrilineal or patrilineal Dna examined, for accuracy certain SNP's have to be searched for. Certain populations have SNP's that are specific to them, so if someone is tested and that SNP shows up in their dna, it's likely they share a common ancestor with whatever population that polymorphism is associated with. Again, this is not race. Not even close. It's population genetics, which you seem to have no understanding of.

You have created a strawman argument against the validity of race as a characterization of human diversity.

Listen, no one ever said there is a "black gene" or a "white gene" or an "asian gene." Race is simply a measure of the relative frequencies of characteristics (mainly phenotypes) inside a population. And as such is a reasonable way to measure other heritable traits like IQ and conscientiousness in populations.

Human populations are indeed very genetically similar but this doesn't really mean much. For example we have 98% of the same DNA as a chimpanzee, next are you gunna say that species doesn't exist? The African Agama lizard and the Laudakia lizard in Eurasia are genetically very similar, but they still have an obvious biological reason for being separate. Likewise the African negro human and the Eurasian Caucasoid human are very genetically similar and also have obvious biological reasons for being classified as separate.

Politically correct anthropologists love to tell negros that race doesn't exist, but when they are in the forensics lab analyzing a skeleton race and gender are the first things they look for.

HugoChavezJr:


Yes, she's right that white people and Asians have higher IQs than blacks on average, but then again, an IQ test isn't a sole factor in determining intelligence. And I laugh when she says that the Obama administration has been anti white. I mean is she that dull? Obama has catered to every single demographic except for black folks, so I don't know how Obama has been anti-white. Also, many blacks have made great intellectual strides without "affirmative action" or help from the "superior" white man, so I don't see where she's getting at.

I agree, when i spoke to her i told her to kill herself.

All that white people victimhood crap made me nauseous. She is wayward, i told her she should be fighting for eugenics in Africa not trying to be a pet to white racists.

orunto27:
The Bible Job was patiently stimulating his own economy and life when Satan threw spanner into his wheels. Nigeria was making good progress before Obama established ISIS(Bokoharam) in Nigeria. He used South Africa and Israel to thwart every effort of GEJ to fight bokoharam. He played on the greed of the Ibo youths to scatter Nigeria. He tried Buhari until he knew the difference between Kenya and Nigeria. The whites in the U.S., Donald Trump and his cotravellers are cruel scorns. D.T is derogating B.O to disgrace him out of office. Nothing concerns Africa about the bleeding mouth s of these white scoffers.

What is the answer to this question and why?

McSquishi:


1. I've never heard of the term "blood ethnicity"... Do you mean blood types and the prevalence of certain blood type by ethnicity? Minus the blood part, though, yes ethnicity exists but also yes, it is a social construction. For example, in America we recognize a "Hispanic" ethnicity. Hispanic nations come from the Caribbean, South & Central America. There were different indigenous populations inhabiting these lands before Western colonization, different African populations in different frequencies were brought to and mixed with these indigenous ones as well as Spaniard & Portuguese populations mixing. Average Dominican "blood"/dna will look different from the average Mexican dna (Mexican having larger indigenous snp's, Dominican having larger African snp's). Nonetheless, they both are of the Hispanic ethnicity.

Ethnicity can't be quantified genetically. Doesn't mean it isn't real, just not biologically meaningful.

2.)http://m.jhered.oxfordjournals.org/content/94/1/81.full
looks like breeds are man made as well, lol. There was a process of (un)natural selection in order to select for various traits. Read the study, or just the abstract. Educate yourself instead of tasking me to do so

My understanding the fact that race doesn't exist has nothing to do with security, lol. If anything, the concept is perpetuated by those who feel the most insecure. Race was created in order to promote White Anglo-Saxon superiority. The insecure folks are the ones who cling to a handful of genetic skin mutations to explain the state of the world.

Anyone who would claim that the difference between the two dogs here is nothing more than "social construct" is either incredibly insecure about being black, just an idiot or both.

There is a time when you have to stop self selecting biased research to support your views and start looking at the world objectively. There are obvious biological differences between the races. When blacks talk about genetic diversity it just makes me cringe, you insecure afrocentrics don't even know how to pretend to be proud without making yourself look inferior. I have included an image of the founder population effect.

Basically when you make that claim you are asserting that other races evolved from blacks. In your insecure mind this sounds like a good thing, but to any learned individual the implications of such a truth are obvious. Imagine the black race is the founder population with the highest genetic diversity, lets say those red dots included genes for IQ and those blue dots included genes for conscientiousness.

Other races would then have higher frequencies of intelligence and consciousness than the black race, which they do of course.

McSquishi:


1. I've never heard of the term "blood ethnicity"... Do you mean blood types and the prevalence of certain blood type by ethnicity? Minus the blood part, though, yes ethnicity exists but also yes, it is a social construction. For example, in America we recognize a "Hispanic" ethnicity. Hispanic nations come from the Caribbean, South & Central America. There were different indigenous populations inhabiting these lands before Western colonization, different African populations in different frequencies were brought to and mixed with these indigenous ones as well as Spaniard & Portuguese populations mixing. Average Dominican "blood"/dna will look different from the average Mexican dna (Mexican having larger indigenous snp's, Dominican having larger African snp's). Nonetheless, they both are of the Hispanic ethnicity.

Ethnicity can't be quantified genetically. Doesn't mean it isn't real, just not biologically meaningful.

2.)http://m.jhered.oxfordjournals.org/content/94/1/81.full
looks like breeds are man made as well, lol. There was a process of (un)natural selection in order to select for various traits. Read the study, or just the abstract. Educate yourself instead of tasking me to do so

My understanding the fact that race doesn't exist has nothing to do with security, lol. If anything, the concept is perpetuated by those who feel the most insecure. Race was created in order to promote White Anglo-Saxon superiority. The insecure folks are the ones who cling to a handful of genetic skin mutations to explain the state of the world.

Well if ethnicity has no biological basis then why can it be determined to the tribe/nation by mitochondrial DNA? Basically this is checkmate, science can determine a persons ethnicity and science can determine a persons race without even looking at them. You need to reeducate yourself on modern genetics.

These are mitochondrial DNA reports from people who are white, Asian and black. In many cases DNA can pinpoint a persons origin to the state and identify any mixture to the decimal point. Race is very very real, even though it makes you upset.

johnmartus:
OH INDEED YOU ARE CURSED. NOW YOU WILL BE PROUD OF YOURSELF THAT YOU ARE A GRADUATE? THOU BE A GRADUATE DOES NOT MAKE ONE INTELLIGENT OR DILIGENT.WHITE ARE CALLOUS THIS USELESS GUY HE ALWAYS CREAT THREAD IN ORDER TO GET ATTENTION.WHITE ROBBED AFRIKA WITH THEIR TRICK AND FORCED THEM TO DISOBEYING THEIR LEADER IN ORDER TO GET WHAT THEY NEED EASELIY BECAUSE THEY KNEW WITHOUT THAT THEY CANNOT ARCHEVED THEIR MISSION IN AFRIKA,WHITE DISORGANISED AFRICA POLITICAL SETTING THEY LATER TAKEN FULL CONTROLLED OF IT.THE EMERGENCY OF WHITE IN AFRIKA COULD BE CLASSIFIED AS A BITTER EXPERENCES IN THE LIFE OF AFRIKA WHITE LEFT AFRIKA WITHOUT A TANGIBLE LEGACY I DONT KNOW MAYBE YOU CAN POINT TO WHITE LEGACY IN AFRICA?

What is the answer to this question and why?

HugoChavezJr:
Not surprised. Most Yoruba people are uncle Toms and coons anyways.

Is there anything she said that was false?

McSquishi:


I understand she isn't White, I said she's racist. To be racist one needn't be White, correct?

As for the fact that race doesn't exist, this is old news that geneticists revealed in the '90's. There is more genetic differentiation within "races" than their is between "races. The greatest genetic and phenotypic diversity lies within Africa. Many African villages alone contain more diversity within than found in any Asian or European population. But I digress...

You will find there is no clear delineation between races if you do just a smidge of research. The race scientists of the late 1800's early 1900's tried with all their might to define race and failed. Science disproves the notion more and more each day. What genes do White ppl have that no Black or Asian person has? There isn't one.

Race is a social construct. It's real in the sense that it's construction affects us. But not real on a biological or genetic level... Thus, again, intelligence, behavior, etc cannot be linked to it in any meaningful way. Sorry to disappoint you.

Interesting! So now i have two questions for you:

1. Does ethnicity (blood ethnicity) exist, or is it also a social construct like race is?

2. Is breed of dog (or cat) also a social construct or does this logic you used here only apply when the truth makes you insecure?

McSquishi:


Is it low Iq that makes this not worth reading? I could only suffer a few paragraphs before scrolling through for the gist. When racists write their diatribes it's usually written poorly, long winded, and babbling. I think the authors inability to make a cogent & concise argument for "race realism" is the reason it reads as long and strained... thusly unpalatable.

In any case, the author and those that think like that are the epitome of irony. They think of themselves as so enlightened on this issue yet by believing in the concept of biological "race" is in and of itself an admission of one's ignorance. Race simply doesn't exist under a microscope. Therefore any attempts to link evolution, IQ, behavior, etc to "race" is futile & idiotic.

You think race doesnt exist because someone told you it doesn't exist, not because you expended any drop of critical thought on the issue. If you had you would be able to explain to me how/why race doesn't exist. Which you cannot do.

Secondly, she is not a white racist, she is a black Yoruba girl of 25 years.