₦airaland Forum

Lawag3:
Did I say I won't show you my findings if only you specify I can't just can't start spilling facts I want it to be a direct answer to your claims that isn't so hard

Amujale:
Right, since by your own admission, the noah story is fake, then that suggests that it's without merit and as such cannot be used as a point of reference nor a as any type of source.

Furthermore, that renders the chart you posted null and void.

Amujale:
Prove the rhetoric that you're peddling.

Provide us with the proof of these fictional characters of yours.

Amujale:
Prove it.

The Noah story is fake, false and counterintuitive.

Try again, this time kindly provide us with the proof of these fictional characters of yours.

Amujale:
In its original form, the term that would later be Romanised into Africa, predates Rome in itself.

That is to say, the name Africa was coined by the African.

Furthermore, it's the great people of Africa who own the Hieratic script and not anyone else.

Lawag3:
Now my friend what made me call out those facts it was because your said the new testament is false you disprove the bible isn't it? So now I'm telling you to show me where in the new testament was doctored what it was changed from it makes it easier for me because I will know what I'm dealing with .if you can show me where the new testament got it wrong and what it is supposed to be I will be able to say no this is where you got it wrong and here is proof. You get it right?

Amujale:
The Hebrew Isrealite doctrine is toxic.

A doctrine that tells you to hate on Africans for no justified reason, based on a flawed and malicious premise.

My question to our Brothers and Sisters who subscribe to these type of foreign extremist ideologies is this, are you African?

If the answer is No, then we have nothing for you, the exit is that way ➡️

Assuming the answer is Yes, then kindly explain to logic behind subscribing to a foreign extremist ideology that tells you to hate on yourself

Lawag3:
I'm getting there my friend I just want you to tell me what part of the new testament was changed and from what it was changed from. Then I will show you facts that proves everything on the new testament is actually accurate. you made claim that the new testament was doctored I'm only trying to disprove that.

Amujale:
First off, you will have to prove the credibility of the Noah story before peddling these false narratives.

Noah is a fictional character.

The Noah story is fake, false and counterintuitive.

Secondly, kindly point us towards these original scripts, what y'all peddle as paleo-Hebrew, isn't its an African language that was operational amongst the African communities that existed in and around the Levant during the periods Before the Common Era and the early parts of the first millennium CE.

The Hieratic script is an African script and has nothing to does with any foreign extremist ideologically based narratives, whatsoever.

Amujale:
Arabic is older than the Hebrew Language, and the Arabic language isn't even considered to be ancient.

In other words, the Hebrew language is relatively new , accredited to one Eliezee Ben-Yehuda, this was a language that had its written form invented in the 1800's.

Amujale:
Christ comes from the Greek word Kristos which was adopted from the African conception known as KRST.

triplechoice:
The fact that harmatia is used in church theology doesn't make it an idealogy. Hamartiology is an idealogy, while Hamartia is not.

This is the difference you're yet to grasp

Lawag3:
You believe the new testament is a lie? Tell me what you think is wrong with the new testament . Tell me what they changed let me know stop showing only screen shots

Amujale:
The terms 'Christ predates "Christianity".

The first followers to be known as "Chresteans" were the followers of the church of Serapis during the Greco-romans occupation of Alexandria.

triplechoice:
It doesn't matter. The meaning is the same as the first

triplechoice:
There's danger in knowing just a single story.. Chimamanda Adichie

You know a part of the 'story"; harmatia, but not everything, so don't rest until you know what others know that you don't know .

Ignorance is certainly not bliss. I agree with that, but take your own medicine first before offering it to others


The op is dealing not on word origin but on church theology
The focus should be on that. The thread has been badly derailed by you.

Amujale:
Precisely, the first people to be known as Christeans were the followers of the church of Serapis Christus.

There are various concepts that the foreign extremist ideologies make use of today that they adopted from the followers of the church of Serapis i.e Harmatiaology, Soterism e.t.c

triplechoice:
You asked how it's tragic flaw. Britannica is not literature site. See below

Amujale:
Precisely

triplechoice:
You asked how it's tragic flaw

triplechoice:
There are things you are also ignorant of like everyone else

triplechoice:
See below. No need for the quarrel. Nobody knows everything. I have also learnt from you concerning the issue at hand.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/literaryterms.net/hamartia/amp/

triplechoice:
Yes, but the difference is that hamartiology is an ideology ( theology) while harmatia is not even if connected to the latter

triplechoice:
Sorry, I wanted to say they may share the same origin.

The op deals with the ideology of hamartiology and not Just the origin of the word alone

I thought you should have focused on that, instead of making it seem as if he is focused on the etymology of the word. This quarrel on the thread would not have happened.

If you do your research very well you cannot fail not to see that those terms share the same idea behind them.

Fatal flaw is the weakness of the tragic hero which leads to downfall, while sin in hamartiology is also regarded has weakness in Christianity

Amujale:
…..

triplechoice:
Lol
In drama, one of the genres of literature, harmatia means the fatal flaw which leads to the downfall of the hero or heroine in the play, while hamartiology is part of the church theology which deals with the doctrine of sin.

Even though both terms share the same etymology, don't mean the same thing at all. A lion and a tiger are from the same cat family but not the same kind of wild animal.

Harmatia is one of the major feature of drama, while hamartiology which is the subject matter of the op is part of church ideology that has to do with sin.

The op is certainly on the right track No need for the confusion

Amujale:
….

Amujale:
…..