₦airaland Forum

schwarzkopf:
Wow!!! The shitstorm going on at the Pennsylvania avenue is mind boggling.

Temple1288:
You're a big fool. It's been a long time since a sitting President's party won the midterms. But here's the Senate gone red.
Get lost fool!

Anduku:
Very funny , and she's the second after Julie swetnick that will be facing FBI investigation for lying against kavanaugh. I won't be surprised if all of them are eventually charged

Anduku:
Very funny , and she's the second after Julie swetnick that will be facing FBI investigation for lying against kavanaugh. I won't be surprised if all of them are eventually charged

Naza25:
That's the sensible thing to do, no sensible government will allow every Tom, dick and harry to just cross their borders into their country whenever they feel like. No country is run like that. They should go and pass through the legal process of coming into the US. If what these guys are doing is encouraged, then terrorists and criminal elements need no longer fear, they just have to join a caravan and barge their way into the country. And what message are you sending to those who are painstakingly passing through the legal procedure for immigration? You're telling them that it's not worth it since illegal immigrants can actually make it to the US faster and easier than they can. This is just common sense

Martinez19:

Naza25:
Where is the outrage from the media? None!!
Where is the outrage from liberals? None!!
Where is the outrage from African Americans? None!!
Where is the outrage from Abbeybailey and co? None!!

There's only one word to describe all these groups of people, HYPOCRITES!!!

stanech:
Hillary Clinton— the woman who offered the black community hot sauce plus a free Jay-Z & Beyoncé concert in exchange for our vote— now says that all black people look alike.

She also believes we all think alike and vote alike.

Democrats are openly racist. #BLEXIT and #VoteRed

Abbeybailey:
You are afflicted with poverty of brain.
10 years from now, you will still be foaming in the mouth about America while still stuck in penury.

Abbeybailey:
Hush your mouth. Americans of note are talking and a junebug is venting too. A guy that couldn't obtain an American visa on his best day is talking about citizenship in America. Who dash monkey banana.

Abbeybailey:
You can tell that Trump is a foool who knows nothing about the American constitution. He's in early stage of dementia. Any knowledgeable American knows about the 14th amendment which is enshrined in the constitution and can't be wiped out by any president. It takes two third of Congress with 33 States ratification to amend any amendment to the constitution. I do not expect less from a White Nationalist president playing to his racist and bigoted base. Nov 6 is a week away and the Blue shellacking will be enormous.

Abbeybailey:
I wish all you losers having no stake in America keep off my mentions.

stanech:
Just to be clear folks, the media and the Left has laid down the new standards today. The new standards are -> any troubled person that acts in a deranged and criminal manner is now the responsibility of any politician or public figure they follow. This will backfire, badly.

stanech:
Germany to invest in US gas imports

wirinet:
You no. 2 definition agrees exactly with what I said. Look up the meaning of chauvinism.

wirinet:
I already explained to you what nationalism connotes. Nationalism connotes a false sense of superiority, that is what differentiates it from patriotism. This false sense of superiority often lead to break up of countries (usually through conflicts), lead to discrimination by such nationalist groups and often lead to dictatorship.
The confederates claim they were nationalists and we're pursuing a nationalist agenda.
Read this link for balanced arguments on nationalism -
[https://blog.oup.com/2018/02/nationalism-ideology-war/

TheShopKeeper:
...Donald Trump's nationalist rhetorics which are divisive in nature against certain individuals, opposition parties and the media is coming to pass through those who believe in a divided USA...try to watch or listen DT's speeches at recent rallies in Ohio, Nevada and Houston...

wirinet:
I already explained the correlation between "nationalism" and violence. Nationalism according to the "reformed republican party" under the leadership of Trump, connotes hate for Obama, Clinton, Democratic Party, media, immigrants, Muslims (poor ones), LGBT and others with different opinions, in that order.

When you listen to an average election campaign speech by republicans it's words like lock him/her up, stops immigrants from coming and such rhetorics that fires up the crowd.

The republicans dont even bother to run on issues anymore. Just anti-Obama, Clinton, and Pelosi advertisements are enough to rally the Base.

TheShopKeeper:
...this is what happens when someone call himself that very good, not so often used word...'a nationalist'...

Secret Service intercepts suspicious packages sent to Obama, Hillary Clinton

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/suspicious-package-found-at-clintons-home-police-say

The Secret Service said Wednesday that officers "intercepted" two suspicious packages identified as "potential explosive devices" sent to former President Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, as reports of other potential threats against political and media targets led to evacuations in a rapidly evolving security scare.

Local reports said the Florida building housing the office of Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, former Democratic Party chairwoman, was evacuated amid reports of a possible suspicious package. Police in the area seemed to confirm the incident in a Twitter alert.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/suspicious-package-found-near-new-york-home-bill-hillary-clinton-n923816

Suspicious packages that appear to be working explosives were sent to Hillary Clinton, former President Barack Obama, and CNN's New York newsroom, triggering a nationwide investigation Wednesday and bi-partisan condemnation.

The first package intercepted was addressed to the former Democratic presidential candidate and discovered on Tuesday near the Clintons' home in Chappaqua, New York, a suburb of New York City. A second was addressed to Obama and intercepted Wednesday in Washington, D.C., the FBI and Secret Service said in a statement.

The third was addressed to former CIA Director John Brennan and discovered Wednesday at CNN's base in Manhattan. The newsroom was immediately evacuated and the NYPD bomb squad was summoned.

coluka:
Our own Nnamdi Azikiwe and obafemi Awolowo also described themselves as nationalists. I guess they were evil then? You liberals are big jokers, You go and cherry pick things and try to pass it off as the standard norm. So you are claiming that because all these bad guys you named up there called themselves nationalists then anyone who describes themselves as nationalist must be evil. Gaddafi, Saddam Hussein and Osama bin laden described themselves as Muslims, does that make anyone who described himself as a Muslim bad? Hitler and mussolini also described themselves as Christian, does that make everyone who says I am a Christian bad? Kim il sung was Buddhist so anyone who describes themselves as Buddhist must be evil then. This your argument is just a fallacy faulty generalization

budaatum:
There's a caravan of migrants approaching America coming to play into Trump's hands and play well for him. I've never seen a president as lucky as him!

Appleyard:
Per the bolded, It is obvious you don't understand a single thing about the workings of law, and the doctrine of legal reasoning that guides the courts on how they interpret cases and arrived at a ruling.

Stormy's case was dead ab initio (from the beginning). Any libel suit that premise on bribery is always 90 percent dead on arrival because the entire burden of proving the guilt of defamation as claimed by the plaintiff against the defendant is almost too heavy a burden to discharged, considering that the alleging party appears to have been consensual at some point in the whole debacle leading to the primary fact in issue.

The element of consent is always a major focus for the courts when drawing inference from various facts surrounding the primary fact in issue. Once they discover any hint of consent at some point in the course of events leading to the fact in issue, especially where the person alleging is of consensual age, the courts innate rule of legal reasoning comes in to play, and the chances of the alleging party succeeding is almost next to zero where the issue of payment is involved. The legal reasoning behind such position is that you cannot profit from your own wrong when the cards starts crumbling.

So as the name implies, Stormy's case was one hell of a case full of storms that's only headed for failure from day one because;

1. She has nothing to proof and buttress her case

2. Even if she does, she can't prove that DT was knowingly and recklessly being false; hence her inability to shift the burden of proof on DT, and

3. There is the issue of consent at some point, giving her nature of job.

From the beginning, her case was a massive failure, a disaster that should be called "hurricane Stormy", the hooker who have to pay to get laid.

At the bolded, what do you mean by her real case isn't dismissed yet? Are you serious? Ask yourself; what were the factors that necessitated the case for the alleged hush payment? Isn't that what the court just dissected and casted away like a fly in a glass of drinking water? So on what premise would her case for the suppose hush payment lies now? You tell me. Or is there a rule or law in the US legal jurisdiction that says you can treat a case without a fact in issue? Liberal democracy is indeed a record breaker.

Face it, with that decision, her case and whatever related to the hush money is lost already. You even stated the obvious on how slim her chance of winning such a case represents, yet you still believe her "realp case" is not lost yet. That's wishful thinking, friend.

But that's not all. The bad news is that these cases are creating a precedent that would have far reaching effects on other cases both now and in the future. As much as DT is concerned, any case that is brought against him in court would most likely be viewed by Judges as "politically weaponized cases", and the likelihood that such cases will be thrown out by the courts is increasing, as Trump keeps winning and the precedent keeps mounting.

From all angles, it's a dead end for desperate liberals. The more they try, the more they keep making Trump famous. The ediots don't even know they are actually aiding his popularity and actively campaigning for him with all these senseless and baseless accusations.

Very pathetic.